Monday, February 29, 2016

A Queer Thing Happened


 Since 2004, no less than eleven Vatican II dioceses have filed for bankruptcy due to the rampant sodomite/pedophiles in their ranks. The problem is not (and never was) celibacy, but homosexuality. According to researcher Muir ("Homosexuality and the 10% Fallacy" The Wall Street Journal, 3/31/93), research from several countries places homosexual men at about 1% to  3% of the population. That's a 2% average, yet they commit an incredibly disproportionate 20% to 40% of child molestation. According to the Family Research Institute, "If 2% of the population is responsible for 20% to 40% of something as socially and personally troubling as child molestation, something must be desperately wrong with that 2%. Not every homosexual is a child molester. But enough gays do molest children so that the risk of a homosexual molesting a child is 10 to 20 times greater than that of a heterosexual."

 How did the so-called "Gay Mafia" take root in the Vatican? The short answer: Giovanni Montini ("Pope" Paul VI) was an apostate and a raging sodomite. The evidence is as great as it is disturbing.


  • Openly sodomite Irish writer, Robin Bryans, claimed in his 1992 autobiography The Dust Never Settles,that his personal friend (one Hugh Montgomery) told him that he and Montini had been "gay lovers" since his appointment as a diplomat at the Vatican
  • French writer and ambassador Roger Peyrefitte (also a sodomite) stated that while Archbishop of Milan, Montini would go to a secluded house for the purpose of "hooking up" with homosexual men
  • Montini decried "slanderous allegations made against me," but never once mention what they were, nor did he even attempt to defend himself.
  • Fr. Georges de Nantes, one of the first Traditionalist priests openly denounced Montini for his alleged homosexuality, even bringing it to the attention of "Pope" John Paul II so as to prevent his "beatification" and "canonization"
  • According to the New York Times, the Italian actor Paolo Carlini was a frequent visitor of Paul VI and was alleged to be his lover
The "Lavender-ing" of America
Paul VI began to promote notorious sodomites in positions of authority. He single-handedly corrupted the hierarchy across the world. In his book, Goodbye Good Men, by Michael S. Rose, the author relates how any man in America wanting to become a Vatican II "priest," and who is not open to homosexuality, is either not accepted or kicked out of the seminaries. The seminaries that are still open have become breeding grounds of unnatural vice. My spiritual father, Fr. Gommar A.DePauw, told me how he was in charge of admissions to the Archdiocesan seminary (Mount St Mary) in Baltimore prior to Vatican II (where he also taught Canon Law and Moral Theology). He related how he rejected large numbers of applicants based on his doubts concerning their sexual orientation. After the good archbishop died in 1961 (Archbishop Francis Keough), he was replaced--on orders from Roncalli--by "gay friendly" Bp. (later "Cardinal") Lawrence Sheehan, who was also a Modernist. Sheehan's first order of business was to remove Fr. DePauw from his position as Dean of Admissions and replace him with a newly ordained priest who was both "compassionate" towards homosexuals, and not as "rigid" on dogma. Need I tell you the result?

 Here are but a few examples of the sodomites given high places in America by Paul VI. 

  1. Archbishop Rembert Weakland
A friend of Montini since at least 1956, Paul VI appointed this Benedictine as a consultant to the Commission on the Sacred Liturgy of Vatican II. In 1977, he was "consecrated" as "Abp." of Milwaukee. In 1980 Weakland created and financed the "Milwaukee AIDS Project," which not only distributed condoms for sodomites, but promoted masturbation, sadomasochism, and "gay masses." One month after turning 75 in 2002, it was revealed he had given (read: "stolen") over $400,000 to pay off a former "gay lover." Now at age 88, he has not paid for his crime, nor has he suffered any penalties from the Vatican II sect.

     2. Cardinal John Wright
 A sodomite/pederast, Bill Burnett came forward to accuse Wright formally. Wright had been known to have a predilection for boys going back to his days as a priest in Boston. Burnett's uncle (Fr. Raymond Page) would take Burnett out to a holiday home in Massachusetts, where Wright would come and sodomize the boy with help from Page. Wright gave the young Burnett $20 for each time he ravaged him.  At Vatican II, Wright was a strong advocate for the Modernists, especially concerning ecumenism and religious freedom.


     3. Howard Hubbard
Made "bishop" of Albany, NY in 1977, Hubbard advocated for "priestesses," gave "communion" to pro-sodomite, pro-abotion Gov. Andrew Cuomo who lives in open adultery. Hubbard told the New York Times that he would always give "communion" to Cuomo because it's a "private matter." (A public figure who openly flaunts Church teaching is a grave scandal and communion--thank God it's not valid---must be denied).  He was a strong supporter of the sodomite group "Dignity," and was besieged with allegations of male lovers within and without the clergy. He had been complicit in numerous cases of sex abuse cover-ups and was accused of paying a 16 year old boy for sex.  

"Blessed" Paul VI (or as my friend at the wonderful website DailyCatholic.org calls him, Paul the Sick) was made the object of veneration by Frankie. And why shouldn't he do so? Montini had no Faith or Morals, just like the rest of the Vatican II wrecking crew. He's a perfect example of why the Vatican II sect is not, and never was, the Roman Catholic Church--and why they will never be "straightened" out.

19 comments:

  1. I believe I read somewhere about Bella Dodd stating that the USSR had homosexuals infiltrate seminaries back in the 30s (?) in order to bring down the Church. That would seem very plausible in that that would establish a foundation for what happened after Vatican 2. I apologize in advance for any erroneous information. And thank you for a very informative article. May Our Lord continue to Bless your hard work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have heard the same exact info.

      Delete
    2. I've heard that as well. Thank you for your kind words my friend.

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  2. Here are 12 quotes which show how great a sin sodomy is and how greatly the homosexual movement must be resisted.
    http://www.tfpstudentaction.org/politically-incorrect/homosexuality/12-quotes-against-sodomy-that-every-catholic-should-know.html?utm_source=sm-tfpsa&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Signup620150620170004.065&utm_campaign=tfpsa_signup

    ReplyDelete

  3. Bishop Williamson is correct. Rome must come back to the Faith before there can be an agreement

    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/03/bishop-williamson-is-correct-rome-must.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To my readers,
      Catholic Mission is the pseudonym for Lionel Andrades and his inane blog "eucharistandmission." I never spoke about Bp. Williamson in this post. Andrades is a Vatican II Feeneyite. He believes Frankie is "pope"--yet also believes in the Feeneyite heresy denying Baptism of Desire and Baptism of Blood (BOD and BOB respectively). Instead of accepting the Catholic truth that Baptism by water is the ordinary way to enter the Church and BOD/BOB extraordinary ways, he makes a crazy distinction between "visible and invisible." The heresy contained in Vatican II is only hypothetical and known to God since we can't see the dead. I've answered this individual before. I'll just repeat what I said and be done with him.

      OK, now instead of the real distinction of "ordinary/extraordinary" he replaces it with his bizarre "visible/invisible."

      Here's what's wrong:
      1. Hypothetical statements can be heretical.
      To say, "God COULD lie" is heresy because it attributes a moral defect in God Who is all-perfect and cannot act against His Own Divine Essence. To posit the ability of God to lie is contrary to the Faith.

      Therefore, when Vatican II says Protestant SECTS are a "means of salvation" it is heresy because it is against the Nature of Christ's One True Church. It admits of no exceptions.

      2. His "visible/invisible" nonsense reduces Dogmas to matters of empirical verification.

      It is a dogma that Mary was conceived without Original Sin (The Immaculate Conception defined in 1854 by Pope Pius IX).

      This is by nature "invisible and implicit." How did Pope Pius IX know this about Mary? Did he see it happen in the womb of St. Anne? The Bible doesn't mention it. Most, but not all theologians taught Mary was Immaculately Conceived. How could they know? Could they see the state of Mary's soul when she was conceived? This is not a science experiment. We know it's truth on the authority of GOD THE HOLY GHOST who does not permit the pope or the Universal and Ordinary Magisterium to teach error.

      If, however, I point out that the UOM teaches St. Victor died as a catechumen and went to Heaven without BOW because of BOB, Lionel thinks we need to "see the dead" to confirm it. For Lionel, the Holy Ghost can teach us only the things with which he agrees. So we can know about Mary's soul being without Original Sin without empirical verification, but not the soul of St. Victor. Why? His version of the "Church" is one wherein the UOM is fallible, and popes can be heretics.

      He actually says Frankie is a heretic, then claims he remains pope, because he doesn't understand "visible/invisible" Hmmm....did John Paul II (with a doctorate in theology) understand it's wrong to worship false gods when he made an offering to the snake gods in Africa, or kissed the Koran in "respect and reverence?" Were those "innocent mistakes"? Or maybe it's not apostasy because the snake gods are "invisible and implicit" (!)
      (continued below)

      Delete
    2. 3. His dichotomy distorts his already distorted view of "Outside the Church No Salvation" (EENS)

      Lionel thinks EENS is achieved only by BOW. All must enter the Church as members with BOW. He claims (wrongly) that this is infallible. Let's placate him and say this is correct. BOD and BOB cannot save without BOW IF this was true (I'm not saying it is), "visible/invisible" destroys the dogma in one of two ways.

      If it's a hypothetical capable of being fulfilled (there are people saved without BOW known only to God) it makes it false that there is only one baptism--and one by water! People don't really need BOW because there could be invisible exceptions to the dogma. The dogma is thereby rendered as "BOW is absolutely necessary for salvation---unless it's not because there are invisible exceptions."

      If Lionel is claiming it's a hypothetical NOT capable of being fulfilled (like making a "square circle") the hypothetical is superfluous. Why even mention a case that can't happen? It would also be heretical, because if everyone really needs BOW to be saved, then to posit BOB/BOD alone as sufficient (even as an hypothesis) it would be heretical--no different from saying "God COULD lie."

      He also has no explanation as to the promulgation of invalid sacraments by changing matter/form/intention. What does that have to do with EENS? Bottom line: Stay away from Andrades and his ilk.

      Delete
  4. I think the writings of Fr. Luigi Villa are essential reading for Catholics today. Fr. Villa might be called the "Apostle of Catholics", as Saint Paul was the "Apostle of the Gentiles". Saint Paul encountered the Lord on the road to Damascus, was converted and commissioned to convert the Gentiles; Padre Pio encountered the Lord in a vision, was instructed to send Fr. Luigi to Pope Pius XII, who commissioned him to ferret out judeo-masons in the Church.
    Father Villa has unveiled, exposed, reported and explained the origin; the genesis; the strategy and the goals of the judeo-masonic, New World Order Church of Man. How is it possible for any Catholic, who has read Fr. Luigi's report, not to understand, beyond a shadow of a doubt, what is going on, or where the Truth lies? Only the obdurate; the willfully blind; those without eyes to see, or ears to hear; those with hardened hearts, or ulterior motives could fail to discern the Truth about the conciliar popes, VII and the NWO church.
    "Paul VI Beatified?" may be read here:
    http://padrepioandchiesaviva.com/uploads/Paul_VI.._beatified_english.pdf
    and a newer version here:
    http://padrepioandchiesaviva.com/uploads/Chiesa_viva_441_S_en_New_Corrected.pdf
    Actually, all we sedes have to do is tell people: "Go read Fr. Luigi, then you will understand that the NWO church is the enemy of the Catholic Church which we sedes cling to."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Thank you for your good citations and insightful comments, Dr. Lamb!

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  5. Pius XI was elected Pope when he was Archbishop of Milan.
    Ironic how Pius XII promoted Paul VI to Archbishop of Milan.Pius XII knew that it was very possible Paul VI would have a good chance of becoming Pope.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True. Pope Pius XII certainly made many serious errors in judgement. However, almost all of them (including promoting Montini) came about in or after 1954, when he was sick with stomach cancer. May God have mercy on his soul.

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. I still hold the position of all Pius XII changes from 1951-1958 being heretical,in hindsight.
      With that said,I have seen literal videos of him from 1951-1958 (when he was on rampage of change & destruction) where he is very active,alert,mobile,and lively.
      I know and accept he was sick but the speech days before his death from his balcony hardly conveys the image of a sickly,feeble,deranged,dying man.
      He was well aware of reality from 1951-1958.
      Check out the clips of him from 1954-1958.He was very alert and far from a bed ridden sickly invalid with dementia.

      Delete
    3. Either something is heretical or it is not. Something cannot be heretical in retrospect. The burden is on you to show how the changes were heretical. The changes gave rise to the acceptance of change. The future changes were heretical. Pope Pius XII was a good pontiff who defined the Assumption, canonized Pope St Pius X, calling it the most important act of his papacy. Were there some non-heretical errors I. Judgement? Yes, to be sure. You must explain how the Holy Week changes constitue heresy. They don't.


      ---Introibo

      Delete
    4. I wouldn't be surprised, given all of the infiltration the Vatican had undergone in the previous 50 years before Pius XII's pontificate, if certain changes were the work of the fifth column, perhaps without the knowledge and/or approval of Pius XII. Bella Dodd affirmed that the Communists had placed over one thousand Communists (among them sodomites, I'm sure) in the seminaries in the 1920s.

      Delete
  6. According to Fr. Luigi, Pope Pius XII deposed Montini immediately upon the discovery of Montini's betrayal of Priests sent clandestinely behind the iron curtain to the KGB. According to General Laconte of the French Secret Service, Cardinal Pizzardo had more to do with Montini's removal to Milan than Pius XII did. Milan was a Cardinal's Seat, but Pope Pius refused to make Montini a Cardinal, thus precluding Montini from being able to participate in the conclave after Pope Pius' death. Pope Pius never allowed Montini to step over the Vatican's threshold again during his lifetime.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for this important information Dr. Lamb. Too bad Pope Pius hadn't excommunicated him "Vitandus"

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. Do you have any information as to why Pius XII would've allowed (chosen) Montini as Secy of State? Montini was suspected of 'modernism' early on in his career.

      Delete
  7. Pius XII was more modern & progressive than John XXIII.
    Yet,time after time,people will defend Pius XII.Its a very bizarre circumstance that exists.

    ReplyDelete