tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post4790005262431282458..comments2024-03-29T04:51:09.098-07:00Comments on Introibo Ad Altare Dei: The Real Change You Can Believe InIntroibo Ad Altare Deihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comBlogger51125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-22157121798739930992017-08-01T12:52:24.886-07:002017-08-01T12:52:24.886-07:00The Dimonds make EVERYTHING look foolish. They are...The Dimonds make EVERYTHING look foolish. They are not real Benedictines, and while I agree some UFO activity is demonic, the fact they are talking about it makes people less likely to believe them. With all that's wrong in the world, UFOs are not at the top of the list, and if not spoken of correctly makes you appear strange.<br /><br />---Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-85021670867971275612017-08-01T10:51:55.471-07:002017-08-01T10:51:55.471-07:00Once I learned about St.Victor & St.Emmerentia...Once I learned about St.Victor & St.Emmerentiana,the Dimond Bros look foolish.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-56640350840523076882017-08-01T00:46:19.734-07:002017-08-01T00:46:19.734-07:00Hi, I made this comment earlier but either you did...Hi, I made this comment earlier but either you did not approve of it or it never got through.<br /><br />[Modified:]<br /><br />You should stop criticize the Dimonds on their UFO research, since it makes you look like a fool -- and you may perhaps even be committing a mortal sin. Have you even read the material they produced on the topic? If I recall correctly, you said you have not in another post/comment (but I may be mistaken). If true, Do you not fear God?<br /><br />Also, why you compare or lump together MHFM's UFO research with individuals as those you listed in this post -- that spoke in favor of them (as if UFOs are something else than demonic) -- is also impossible to understand. MHFM exposes the UFO/Alien phenomenon as demonic, and they do it in a very good way. That you actually complain about this, when tens of millions believe in UFOs -- and perhaps billions more in other civilizations in our universe (which is also refuted by them) -- only makes you look like a fool, since you obviously have no understanding of this issue or the real ramifications of it.<br /><br />To learn that the UFO/Alien phenomenon is demonic (and nothing but demonic without exception) is very important to know about today -- and especially more so since the media indoctrinates people into believing in other civilizations in our universe; and unless people actually are taught this (that Aliens/UFOs are demonic and that only Earth is habitable, or created as God's purpose for humankind to live on before the judgment), people -- even those calling themselves christian -- may instead get the impression that they could be some advanced civilization, or something more “mysterious”, which may make them fascinated into learning of the “secrets” behind this phenomenon and delve into the occult, so to speak. Since most non-christians probably will not want to believe this phenomenon is demonic, people like Eric Von Daniken and even Francis (whom you criticized) is to be excepted.<br /><br />The only part about their UFO book I did not like was the second part* -- but that was only because they made many bold assumptions about the motives of why people did this or that (such as they lied etc.) but which, of course, they cannot know is true. But overlooking this, part 2 also refuted some of the more well known “proofs” of the existence of ufos and aliens and debunked them.<br /><br />*Part 1 was actually really good at exposing ufos as a completely non-physical manifestation (demonic) in the cases it could be determined the phenomenon was not natural (aircraft, weather balloon, secret technology etc.) with the observations from the top ufo experts in the world themselves. Examples demonstrating this: a physical object can't make a 180 degree turn in a split second, but these ufos are known to make such movies frequently; neither can a physical object fly through objects, or merge together or separate themselves again into several ufos.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-75443175491806018362017-07-26T14:24:19.598-07:002017-07-26T14:24:19.598-07:00Thank you! I will run a first installment next mon...Thank you! I will run a first installment next month. If the reaction is positive in both feedback and traffic to this blog, I will continue it as a once per month series!<br /><br />---Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-89259443488284189032017-07-26T14:14:05.486-07:002017-07-26T14:14:05.486-07:00I too would benefit from your study on rock and po...I too would benefit from your study on rock and pop music. Charles Martelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03959181517711730173noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-31571536322969414322017-07-25T18:35:54.153-07:002017-07-25T18:35:54.153-07:00Thanks David! I think I'll put out the first p...Thanks David! I think I'll put out the first post next month, and if the reception is positive, I will keep it as a series of posts (one per month).<br /><br />---Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-71259299413585632842017-07-25T18:29:25.955-07:002017-07-25T18:29:25.955-07:00Yes, that would a great monthly rotating post topi...Yes, that would a great monthly rotating post topic. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10128691219846641150noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-57061951206502881112017-07-25T17:43:05.863-07:002017-07-25T17:43:05.863-07:00George,
The Pontifical Biblical Commission was ask...George,<br />The Pontifical Biblical Commission was asked the following:<br /><br />"Whether in the designation and distinction of six days with which the account of the first chapter of Genesis deals, the word 'DAY' can be assumed either in its proper sense of a natural day, or in the improper sense of a certain space of time; and whether with regard to such a question there can be free disagreement among the exegetes?"<br /><br />On June 30, 1909, the Commission (with full approval from His Holiness Pope St. Pius X) responded:<br /><br />"IN THE AFFIRMATIVE." This means that the "days" of creation need not be actual periods of twenty-four hours each. This also comports with the Commission's decision of June 23, 1905 (also approved by Pope St. Pius X) that Scripture gives historical accounts except "...where without opposing the sense of the Church and preserving its judgement, it is proved with strong arguments that the sacred writer did not wish to put down true history, and history properly so-called, but to set forth, under the appearance and form of history a parable, an allegory, or some meaning removed from the properly literal or historical significance of the words."<br /><br />---Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-29801886815261281162017-07-25T17:20:40.885-07:002017-07-25T17:20:40.885-07:00Introibo, you wrote: "Pope St Pius X taught t...Introibo, you wrote: "Pope St Pius X taught that the universe might be very old and that it does not contradict the Bible." When and where did Pius X teach this?George R.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-12691640646914387442017-07-25T15:57:03.081-07:002017-07-25T15:57:03.081-07:00I assume the commenter above, although anonymous i...I assume the commenter above, although anonymous is Emil !<br /><br />---Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-12941699042848325392017-07-25T15:55:33.117-07:002017-07-25T15:55:33.117-07:00You interpret those Councils to YOUR LIKING EMIL! ...You interpret those Councils to YOUR LIKING EMIL! St Augustine is not the only theologian and the Church must decide what Her teaching means through the unanimous consent of Her theologians. There were many that disagreed with St. Augustine. You repeat yourself because you have nothing to say in response to my pointing out how you have repeatedly twisted the meaning of the Gospel of St John regarding water Baptism, etc. <br /><br />Emil has set himself up, in typical Feeneyite fashion, as his own Magisterium. That places you outside the Church where there is no salvation.<br /><br />I'll be praying for your conversion Emil.<br /><br />---Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-61288596031114391962017-07-25T15:48:50.963-07:002017-07-25T15:48:50.963-07:00You don't understand what I was writing, i.e. ...You don't understand what I was writing, i.e. you don't understand st.Augustine teaching about predestination, God's grace and the original sin.<br />Man's will after original sin is to be voluntary slave to Satan, and original sin is real sin, not something imaginary sin. Church in Council in Carthage anathemize anyone who is saying that unbaptised infants go to some middle place between Heaven and Hell. So punishemnts for original sin is Hell, it is real sin. How can it be, if it is sin of Adam? It is traducianism, but that is another subject.<br />I know that modernist theologians teach that God wills salvation of all mankind, but that is not teaching of st.Augustine and some other Church's fathers regarding st.Paul sentence to Timothy.<br />Human's free will is not same as before Adam's sin. We are slave of Satan, and without God's grace we can not do any good. Please read canons of Council in Orange (A.D.529).<br /><br />I will not write anymore as I repeat myself.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-61604348846492282732017-07-25T15:05:29.180-07:002017-07-25T15:05:29.180-07:00The part where you say, "In my interpretation...The part where you say, "In my interpretation" says it all! Not the Church, but Emil. God knows who's going to reject and accept Grace because he knows the future. Mary could have rejected God's grace but she chose not to, and God foresaw this about her. In similar fashion, if I were on the roof and observe two cars speeding towards each other I would know they will crash beforehand, but it was the free will of the drivers that caused the accident not me.<br /> All the pre-Vatican II theologians agree that God sincerely desires the salvation of all people and does not positively predestine anyone to Hell. Anyone who is damned stands condemned by the misuse of their free will. The decision of Christ at the Last Judgement manifestly supposes that the reprobate are to be condemned only because of their evil works, not because of the arbitrary Will of God or because of Original Sin. For thus will Christ address the damned, "Depart from Me, you cursed, into everlasting fire...for I was hungry and you gave me not to eat...(St. Matthew 25). God's salvific will is seen in 1 Timothy 2: 3-4, "For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, Who will have all men to be saved, and to come to the knowledge of the truth." <br /><br />---Introibo <br />Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-81482282453451846132017-07-25T14:30:02.771-07:002017-07-25T14:30:02.771-07:00No, it is not calvinism, but the teaching of st.Au...No, it is not calvinism, but the teaching of st.Augustine which is accepted as Church's teaching (but which was rejected in modern times from jesuits as jansenism or calvinism since they have not guts to condemn great Church's father st.Augustine).<br />And there is no unjustice if God elects some people for salvation, and others rejects. <br />Because every man is sinner before God, even infants. <br />It is similar as King could give mercy for someone who deserve capital punishment, and does not give mercy to other criminals.<br />I repeat, if God's grace is not irresistible them Mary could reject to be Mother of God, Jesus human will could refuse to go on Cross, and angels and saints will for sure rebel against God, because eternity is big enough that every little possibility for rebelion will take place.<br />That is impossible, because God is God, nobody can resist Him, or resist His grace.<br />How could God even made the world if there is possibility that every angel and man will rebel against Him?<br />God is not playing with probabilities, He is almighty God.<br />And st.Augustine answer to pelagian's objection to God's supreme grace and will is: if you are looking for rewards, you will find only punishments.<br />Yes, pelagians like to say that they could resist God's grace, so they want have rewards from God for not rejecting His grace.<br />St.Augustine answered them (in my interpretation) - you will have punishments because you don't know and don't have faith in true God who is Almighty.<br />St.Paul said that God is not only make us capable to do good, but also to will us to do good.<br />So, nobody is good by himself, but by God's grace which change the heart of sinner to the heart of saint. Mary is not by herself the most blesses creature, but by plentitude of God's grace.<br />And I repeat, if Mary could reject God's grace, there will be no Jesus Christ and our salvation.<br />And you think that God will take that risk and throw the dice?Emil Brusićhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17424655176261939468noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-60412918832898162082017-07-25T13:55:01.706-07:002017-07-25T13:55:01.706-07:00You did not read the post with the teaching of the...You did not read the post with the teaching of the Church. If God's grace is only acting on some and not on others, the fault would lie with God, not the free will of people. The Irresistible grace doctrine is Calvinist not Catholic. <br />Read the theologians who explain Church teaching.<br /><br />---Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-21888773173167481512017-07-25T13:44:49.577-07:002017-07-25T13:44:49.577-07:00No, it is nor calvinism or jansenism, it is offici...No, it is nor calvinism or jansenism, it is official doctrine of the Church promulgated on Councils in Carthage and Orange.<br />God is not imposing by force his will on man, but His grace is acting on human as the most desirable good which is more atractive then any creature for which man has concupiscence.<br />Man's heart is always turning where he see greater good for him, and nobody will turns to less good.<br />If that is not true, then Mary could resist to God's proposal, and even Jesus human nature and His human will could oppose God's will and there will be no salvation at all.<br />That god whose grace is not stronger than man's concupiscence can not be true God.<br />Also, if God's grace is not superior to everything else, then angels and saints could rebel against God in eternity.<br />And that is impossible as it was impossible for Mary to reject to be Theotokos, and as it was impossible for Jesus human nature and will to reject God's will to go on the Cross.<br />Most of modern catholics are in this in pelagian's error.Emil Brusićhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17424655176261939468noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-88405938287663205352017-07-25T13:22:48.147-07:002017-07-25T13:22:48.147-07:00So noted! Thank you my friend.
---Introibo So noted! Thank you my friend.<br /><br />---Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-51116656775215337722017-07-25T13:21:47.641-07:002017-07-25T13:21:47.641-07:00I'd enjoy reading your study on pop music.I'd enjoy reading your study on pop music.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-74962631995970408622017-07-25T13:20:46.873-07:002017-07-25T13:20:46.873-07:00Wow. That is loaded with misconceptions. Evolution...Wow. That is loaded with misconceptions. Evolution of the body is not about "monkeys." See my post "Monkey Business About Creation"<br />http://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2017/02/monkey-business-about-creation.html?m=1.<br /><br />For the Church's teaching on predestination read my post "The Elect"<br />http://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2017/04/the-elect.html?m=1<br /><br />You ask, "How can God desire something that will not happen?"<br />Easy answer: "Free Will." You desire that your children grow up and become God fearing adults; however they have free will and might not. God will not desire something so as to override our free will. That is Calvinism. <br /><br />I urge you to learn the faith. May I suggest "Fundamentals if Catholic Dogma" by theologian Ott. You can by it used off Amazon.com. Once you understand the Faith properly you will reject your errors.<br /><br />God bless,<br /><br />---Introibo <br />Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-17359247372199404452017-07-25T12:58:29.408-07:002017-07-25T12:58:29.408-07:00What is evolution of the body?
How can the Pope wr...What is evolution of the body?<br />How can the Pope wrote that Book of Genesis could be wrong, and perhaps God put soul of Adam to the body of some monkey?<br />It is heresy and I don't doubt that every true Pope would condemned Pio XII.<br />And of course it is heresy that all mankind are children of God.<br />Don't you know that adoption of God's children is the true effect and the meaning of baptism? <br />If someone is God's son or daughter he can not end in the Hell, because God will not allow it.<br />Bur we again by sin lost that sanctifying grace and become again God's children by the sacrament of confession.<br />If every man is God's child there is no need for baptism, confession and the Church.<br />You mentioned that God desire is to save all mankind. That is root for rejecting dogma of predestination, and st.Augustine teach us that God wills that all people, from all races and nations, from both sexes and from all positions within society be saved who are His chosen for salvation.<br />How can God desire something which will not happened - heresy of universal salvation?<br />I did not mention without reason that you, and many traditional catholics and sedevacantists should find out Church's dogma of predestination and many things will become clear then.<br /><br />God bless.Emil Brusićhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17424655176261939468noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-78433757364491752942017-07-25T12:23:48.220-07:002017-07-25T12:23:48.220-07:00No, I don't believe that a pope can teach here...No, I don't believe that a pope can teach heresy. The problem (with your thesis) is that what they wrote ISN'T heresy. Evolution of the body is possible. Pope St Pius X taught that the universe might be very old and that it does not contradict the Bible. Of course, he's not really a Saint for you because Pope Pius XII canonized him. The Assumption is not dogma either because Pius XII proclaimed it. There's nothing wrong with NFP when used in accordance with Church teaching and not simply to avoid children in marriage. <br /><br />We are "all God's children" taken in the context written simply means we are all created by God and He desires our salvation. However, you do not read what the Church teaches through Her approved theologians. Was Pope Pius X (not a Saint for you) a real pope, or did your private reading of something he wrote push the last pope back to Leo XIII? Again, this is private interpretation run amok not Catholicism.<br /><br />---Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-81639672799728304052017-07-25T12:07:03.095-07:002017-07-25T12:07:03.095-07:00Of course Pio XII was not pope, because he wrote i...Of course Pio XII was not pope, because he wrote in 'Humani Generis' that theory of evolution could be true. He also said to Italian's midwifes that NFP could be justified.<br />And Benedict XV in 'Ad Beatissimi Apostolorum' wrote heresy that all men are God's children.<br />http://krugzemaljski.blogspot.hr/2016/11/ad-beatissimi-apostolorum.html<br />Do you Introibo believe that the Pope could write document which containes heresy, and still to remaine as the Pope?Emil Brusićhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17424655176261939468noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-60128136330926330702017-07-25T12:04:07.679-07:002017-07-25T12:04:07.679-07:00Please cite the pre-1917 papal decree that forbade...Please cite the pre-1917 papal decree that forbade the granting of Christian burial to catechumens. If what the Code declared was novel teaching St Victor wouldn't be venerated as a Saint for centuries before the 1917 Code.<br /><br />Roncalli wasn't the first antipope? You might want to join Richard Ibranyi and his cult in New Mexico. According to him there hasn't been a pope since 1130 AD. What you propose is lunacy not Catholicism.<br /><br />---Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-64742128144355712402017-07-25T11:54:04.221-07:002017-07-25T11:54:04.221-07:00So you are citing Code od Canon Low from 1917. as ...So you are citing Code od Canon Low from 1917. as something it should be dogmatic and the truth of the all times.<br />Don't you know that Church before that forbade to said the Holy Mass from any man, adult or infant, who died without baptism, and the same could not be burried in catholic cemetery?<br />That what you have cited is new teaching, and there is no such novel teaching in the Church.<br />For sure, John XXIII was not the first antipope in the modern times.<br /><br />God bless.Emil Brusićhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17424655176261939468noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-68174528978954085492017-07-25T11:44:13.034-07:002017-07-25T11:44:13.034-07:00Indeed it does Joann! Thanks for your input also r...Indeed it does Joann! Thanks for your input also re: posts on music groups.<br /><br />---Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.com