tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post7803687231027492475..comments2024-03-28T16:36:47.245-07:00Comments on Introibo Ad Altare Dei: The Ordinary Magisterium Of The PapacyIntroibo Ad Altare Deihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comBlogger112125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-84766523207748354362024-03-02T06:39:36.521-08:002024-03-02T06:39:36.521-08:00Yes, bit what about papal declarations "order...Yes, bit what about papal declarations "ordering" Catholics to commit sin? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-10161773237014046692018-03-25T17:04:57.898-07:002018-03-25T17:04:57.898-07:00Anon @ 3:37-Thank you for the information. I'm...Anon @ 3:37-Thank you for the information. I'm not surprised they get material from an off-the-wall man who is now a cult leader. <br /><br />Anon@ 4:45--Sad but very true.<br /><br />God Bless you both,<br /><br />---IntroiboIntroibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-72474722279115295702018-03-25T16:45:10.511-07:002018-03-25T16:45:10.511-07:00The Dimonds are so very quick to judge Frank as co...The Dimonds are so very quick to judge Frank as committing a “mortally sinful act of bearing false witness”. They also told me I was committing a mortally sinful act of smoking cigarettes. They are so busy condemning others that they won’t take a good look at themselves. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-9611472436407238702018-03-25T15:37:49.966-07:002018-03-25T15:37:49.966-07:00Introibo you are correct to suspect them of "...Introibo you are correct to suspect them of "lifting the material" from others. I believe they stole their first book from Richard Ibranyi (I believe they sued for the rights to the material because Ibranyi wrote it while in the "monastery"). Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-30872928948746199752018-03-25T14:45:02.188-07:002018-03-25T14:45:02.188-07:00Hi Fred! (Or is it Bobby)?,
Your syntax is immedi...Hi Fred! (Or is it Bobby)?,<br /><br />Your syntax is immediately clear, unless Your sycophants are starting to imitate that as well! In any case, I’m sure Frank was unaware of anything done by the Dimonds prior to his post. Of course you immediately ascribe bad motivation and call names (“liar”) like good Feeneyites do. The malevolent, misfit, wannabe “monks” have proven themselves dishonest time and time again. It wouldn’t surprise me if the material was lifted from others prior to when they wrote it. <br /><br />“A careful study of the issue”? I nearly fell on the floor laughing!! Perhaps they should do a careful study of how the Church teaches us. However, that would mean giving up the entire Feeneyite error—and an end to their role as the greatest proponents of this denial of Church teaching. I’m afraid they have neither the intellect or honesty necessary. They need prayers desperately.<br /><br />—-Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-61259532709582012052018-03-25T14:25:05.163-07:002018-03-25T14:25:05.163-07:00Anonymous @ 1:35 pm
You give off a creepy, cultis...Anonymous @ 1:35 pm<br /><br />You give off a creepy, cultish vibe. I'm not trying to be rude. I'm just being honest. <br /><br />The Dimonds have many "slavish" followers, and this tendency is a common fault among humans. Some people *need* to have heroes to which they can cling. It's called an "inordinate attachment to creatures."<br /><br />As for Frank Rega: Seems like an intelligent, articulate fellow to me? Wrote a good article which importantly wasn't long and boring. Can't say the same for the Dimonds. <br /><br />That's my 2 cents worth.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-59398009680762939542018-03-25T13:35:45.501-07:002018-03-25T13:35:45.501-07:00Frank Rega:
Your statement that the Dimonds did n...Frank Rega:<br /><br />Your statement that the Dimonds did not come up with anything original on the Gal. 2 issue is a lie, and perhaps a mortally sinful act of bearing false witness. Your attempt to take credit for their video or their work is pathetic, dishonest and disgraceful. Perhaps you are jealous that MHFM’s treatment of the matter is, as far as I’ve seen, by far the best that has been done: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxDvhDIiVc0 <br /><br />Bro. Peter Dimond mentioned the possibility that St. Paul did not rebuke St. Peter in an audio in 2009 (six years before your blog post), and he believed it was a possibility for years before that (perhaps seven years or more before that), when he read Clement of Alexandria’s quote in Eusebius’ ecclesiastical history. Since he mentioned the possibility that it was not St. Peter years before your blog post, should we conclude that you got the idea from him? Bro. Peter certainly did not get the idea from your 2015 post, which is inaccurate in various ways, by the way. For instance, you quote something that says St. Jerome thought it was not St. Peter in Galatians 2, whereas Bro. Peter’s video (which reflects a careful study of the issue) correctly points out that St. Jerome held that it was St. Peter but that the event was simulated by Peter and Paul. So, his video covers the issue more accurately and in much more depth. There are perhaps 100 things in Bro. Peter’s video (or more) that are not covered in your post. They include: a detailed discussion of the Greek manuscript evidence and the relevant words and concepts; a detailed look at the chronology between Acts and Galatians; the connections between Acts 11 and Galatians 2 and their relevance to the issue; an examination of the contextual evidence in Galatians 2; and much more. Anyone who actually watches Bro. Peter’s video can see the kind of work, thought and study that went into it, which far surpasses what you have written. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-80809144014737541112018-03-24T14:53:00.930-07:002018-03-24T14:53:00.930-07:00In response to anon @ 3:49:
I don’t believe after...In response to anon @ 3:49:<br /><br />I don’t believe after a cursory reading that there is enough (based on that information alone) to conclude Roncalli defected. I’m still looking into all angles and will let my readers know what I come up with by writing a post. I know Roncalli defected, but I cannot used information I learned from another to prove it to anyone else. <br /><br />Thanks for the information my friend!<br /><br />God Bless,<br /><br />—-Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-72069030912649359692018-03-24T12:41:55.841-07:002018-03-24T12:41:55.841-07:00Anonymous @ 11:12 am
Sure. I completely understand...Anonymous @ 11:12 am<br />Sure. I completely understand, and I'm completely unconcerned. I'm sure you realize I wasn't posting for your eyes only. In this environment it goes without saying that anyone may pass comment on any post they like, so I've not broken any blog protocols, as it were.<br /><br />Anyway, God bless and have a super<br />weekend! :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-41628810836084937592018-03-24T11:12:48.007-07:002018-03-24T11:12:48.007-07:00Anon @8:37 - In my original post I was addressing ...Anon @8:37 - In my original post I was addressing Introibo. I don’t know who you are, but unless your name is Introibo, I am putting everything you say in the wash and you can “sniff” that.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-6621130873156937552018-03-24T09:59:17.782-07:002018-03-24T09:59:17.782-07:00I’m sure I’m on their list of those “damned to Hel...I’m sure I’m on their list of those “damned to Hell” as well, Frank! Lol!<br /><br />God Bless,<br /><br />—-Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-73287593508305060072018-03-24T09:58:01.767-07:002018-03-24T09:58:01.767-07:00Jerome,
Please keep in mind that Protestants “do s...Jerome,<br />Please keep in mind that Protestants “do some good things too.” While I recognize their works, e.g., against atheism, as good and useful, Protestantism leads souls to Hell. This is reminiscent of V2 ecclesiology whereby there are “elements of truth” in false religions making them more or less praiseworthy and a “means of salvation.” <br /><br />The fact remains that the Dimonds are Feeneyites who keep people away from the Sacraments. They lead souls in into error and deprive them of grace. This outweighs any good they otherwise do.<br /><br />—-Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-66473817900481597782018-03-24T08:37:57.046-07:002018-03-24T08:37:57.046-07:00Your interpretation that I'm being condescendi...Your interpretation that I'm being condescending is false. It's amazing how you ascertained that from mere text which carries no tone or inflection? You must be a genius! Seriously now, I'm asking questions to stimulate critical thinking. If you find that condescending that's your problem. If you feel inferior - not my problem. I'd like to say "thanks" for your contribution to the conversation but it's impossible to do so honestly. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-20958517005779663292018-03-24T08:01:43.205-07:002018-03-24T08:01:43.205-07:00Anon @7:40 - Must you be so condescending?? I gue...Anon @7:40 - Must you be so condescending?? I guess it reflects your insecurity in trying to prove not every is as smart as you.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-88193603557692763092018-03-24T07:40:21.044-07:002018-03-24T07:40:21.044-07:00Anonymous @ 3:49 am
He did this in 1944 when he w...Anonymous @ 3:49 am<br /><br />He did this in 1944 when he was Apostolic Delegate to Turkey. Long after a file was opened up on him in 1925 for being "suspected of Modernism." If Roncalli had publicly defected from the Faith in 1944 surely the Vatican and Pope Pius XII were aware of their Bishop's offensive homily which brought about his defection? Surely he was cautioned over his errors? Or was it heresy that he was censured over? If he was censured, surely he recanted, because I somehow don't recall Bishop Roncalli being put on trial for heresy? Let's cut to the chase: Is there any official record of Roncalli being censured over those public statements/homily, because if he were it'd have been BIG NEWS, and something that would've been impossible to hide? Has anyone previously thought this was an issue or identified the errors/heresy contained therein his homily? (Has anyone even clearly demonstrated beyond all doubt that he was speaking about *false* ecumenism?) Do you honestly think that the Vatican in 1944 would have let him get away with publicly preaching false ecumenism, considering they already suspected him of Modernism? Do you honestly think what he said made him unpapabile, bearing in mind he was never publicly censured, he was never compelled to publicly recant his errors? Do you honestly think he fell into the category of Pius XII's teachings about whom is ineligible to take part in papal elections?<br /><br />This doesn't pass the sniff test, and neither does the above objection, unless it can be shown that the intended purpose went beyond wishing to invite protestant observers to Vatican II. If he's guilty of heresy for merely inviting observers I guess it means that the Prime Minister of England is guilty of High Treason for inviting observers to their elections. <br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-50155039828944014322018-03-24T07:05:47.258-07:002018-03-24T07:05:47.258-07:00Watch out! MHFM has called me an Apostate, and th...Watch out! MHFM has called me an Apostate, and they might call you one too! Then how would you feel about them?Frank Regahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16899023221249548349noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-16997129481212148122018-03-24T06:47:01.911-07:002018-03-24T06:47:01.911-07:00Translation: “I never understood how the Church el...Translation: “I never understood how the Church elects popes.”<br /><br />Clearly, St Joan of Arc didn’t claim anyone to be “mystically crowned pope.” Not even close. <br /><br />Michael Colin was a seriously disturbed individual who claimed to be “Consecrated a bishop” and crowned “Pope” Clement XV by Christ Himself. Colin was excommunicated by Pope Pius XII in 1951. Colin “ordained” female “priests” who can only “offer mass (sic)” for other women while kneeling. <br /><br />This is apparitionism in the extreme. Private revelations supplant Church doctrine. Mystical coronations, supernatural episcopal consecrations, female “priests” —-what a bunch of demonic inspired insanity!<br /><br />You write, “after Christ rejected Pacelli in 1950.”<br />Are you claiming Pope Pius XII lost the papal office? Careful, “Pope” Bawden recognizes Pope Pius! You might be excommunicated as he reads his decree from the papal pig sty in Kansas! <br /><br />Compared to you, Bawden seems sane.<br /><br />—-Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-65326721657046155942018-03-24T05:51:40.521-07:002018-03-24T05:51:40.521-07:00Frank Rega & Anonymous who argued that MHFM di...Frank Rega & Anonymous who argued that MHFM did not come up with this theory -- what exactly has that to do with the point? Unless one makes up a completely new theory or invention, everything will already have been looked into before by others, since there is nothing new under the sun. Yes, even early saints spoke of this theory, as MHFM also acknowledges on their website and video.<br /><br />What MHFM usually does is to make very good articles and videos on the subjects they are dealing with, and usually with a lot of good and better information than what is already published, or that is made by others. For example, in the blogpost of Frank Rega, no information is available at all of the distinction Peter Dimond made in the video about the name used by this Peter (that was rebuked by Paul) in the original manuscript or Greek, which is different from what is used in naming the Apostle Peter.<br /><br />And by the way, one don't have to give credit to others when writing articles or making videos that are largely in part almost completely one's own work. That one may learn from others is normal and we all do, but to claim one have to attribute everything to others, when one may have been familiar with the arguments for years and not even know from where one first learned about this possibility, is ridiculous.<br /><br />Also, MHFM have held the opinion that St. Paul did not rebuke the Apostle St. Peter for many years, and long before even Frank Rega posted the article.<br /><br />To me, it seems that many anti-MFHM adherents have a bad tendency to complain and find fault with almost any thing when it comes to what they do, even if they do good things. One might not agree with everything they do and even dislike them, but to me it just looks ridiculous to complain about and make arguments out of things like this.Jeromehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04543113751246097671noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-74667551788266270262018-03-24T03:49:03.587-07:002018-03-24T03:49:03.587-07:00Introibo - I came up with following regarding Ronc...Introibo - I came up with following regarding Roncalli:<br /><br />His stance on the ecumenical movement stretched back to the years he was apostolic delegate to Turkey. He gave a Homily in 1944 setting forth his commitment to ecumenism.<br />ncregister.com/daily-news/christian-unity-a-goal-shared-by-John-XXIII-and-John-Paul-II<br /><br />The following article shows the origin of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity is linked with Roncalli’s Secretariat for Promoting Christian Unity and was the beginning of the Church’s formal commitment to the ecumenical movement.<br />vatican.va/roman curia/pontifical council/chrstuni/document/ rc pc chrstuni pro 2005 1996 chrstuni pro en.html<br /><br />Are either of the above citations of significance in showing Roncalli lost the Papal Office, or never attained the Papal Office??<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-10552628602344732632018-03-23T14:58:32.144-07:002018-03-23T14:58:32.144-07:00Thanks for the information Frank! You’re a good ma...Thanks for the information Frank! You’re a good man—please don’t give any more of your work to those malevolent “monks”!<br /><br />God Bless,<br /><br />—-Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-11322703472537965592018-03-23T14:54:54.230-07:002018-03-23T14:54:54.230-07:00Brilliant minds think alike! I have to see the sta...Brilliant minds think alike! I have to see the stated purpose and what was actually done during Roncalli’s alleged reign. Many Traditionalists reject the Pope Pius XII changes because they became noxious in a way the legislator could not have foreseen. Could the same hold true regarding the Secretariat AT THE TIME? In others words, it had no overtly heretical intention until AFTER Roncalli died? If not, and there was an expressed heretical intent—that indeed may be proof he defected!<br /><br />—-Introibo Introibo Ad Altare Deihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11377479441601352059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-81850132176051130412018-03-23T14:24:31.403-07:002018-03-23T14:24:31.403-07:00Frank, interesting. I would be interested in knowi...Frank, interesting. I would be interested in knowing how much of your material Fred "borrowed" and whether due credit was given. In my experience, the Dimonds are plagiarizers and rarely, if ever give credit to their sources. They would like their audience to believe all of their material is original. I will give them credit however for coming up with the theory that demons are flying space ships.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-78750541523003966322018-03-23T09:43:22.747-07:002018-03-23T09:43:22.747-07:00Getting back to St. Paul 'rebuking' St. Pe...Getting back to St. Paul 'rebuking' St. Peter for a moment, anonymous is right is saying that the Dimonds did not come up with anything original on this. Over two years ago I wrote a blog article questioning this 'rebuke,' and it has some links that might be useful. Anyway, I think I might have even sent a copy to the Dimonds (mea culpa). http://divinefiat.blogspot.com/2015/07/did-st-paul-withstand-st-peter-to-his.html<br /><br />Frank Regahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16899023221249548349noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-20984191024441635602018-03-23T03:33:38.103-07:002018-03-23T03:33:38.103-07:00Wouldn’t the fact that Roncalli created the Secret...Wouldn’t the fact that Roncalli created the Secretariat for Promoting Christian Unity be enough for him to lose the papal office?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6466183320330735196.post-27234890635752010842018-03-23T02:04:31.137-07:002018-03-23T02:04:31.137-07:00"I notice that you haven't responded to m...<i>"I notice that you haven't responded to me regading your assertion that **I** don't understand the way the Church chooses popes. You accepted "Gregory XVII" as "pope" because he was "mystically crowned" by Christ. Since you understand how the Church chooses popes, this must be a valid way of doing it. Please cite where the Church chooses popes via 'mystical coronation by Christ.'"</i><br /><br />It could pass for a strawman, since I have since then accepted Pope Michael who at least opines, last time I checked, like you, mystical coronations are impossible.<br /><br />I can get only near precedents, namely, as mentioned, St Joan of Arc mediating Christ's dispositions for the kingdom of France, and Sts Bridget and Catherine telling Popes to return and then that the Roman Pope rather than the Avignon Pope was the true one.<br /><br />However, since a mystical coronation of Michel Colin after Christ rejected Pacelli in 1950 would solve a few problems and not interfere with Pope Michael being Pope (Gaston Tremblay forced an adbication in 1968, which therefore is not a valid one and Clement XV, if such, died in 1974, 16 years before conclave convoked as emergency conclave by Bawden, this still leaves Bawden as not interfering with a non-vacancy in the conclave where he was elected and took the name Pope Michael).Hans Georg Lundahlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01055583255516264955noreply@blogger.com