Monday, July 8, 2024

The Four Temperaments---Melancholic (Part II)

 

To My Readers: I have received several requests for posts on the subject of The Four Temperaments. This week's post is the third installment to this most important and interesting topic. I will follow-up with other posts so that by the end of 2024, I will have done some justice to presenting the Four Temperaments. 

I want to acknowledge that I take no credit for the posts on this topic. My primary sources will be from theologian Schagemann and his work entitled Manual of Self-Knowledge and Christian Perfection (1913).  Also, the work of theologian Hock The Four Temperaments (1934) will be used throughout this series of posts, with various other sources. I take absolutely no credit whatsoever for the content of this post (or the ones on this topic to follow). All I did was condense the material of these theologians into a terse post that hopefully will be advantageous for  those looking for information, but without time to read an entire book or two from the pre-Vatican II era on the subject. 

God bless you all, my dear readers---Introibo

The Melancholic Temperament--Part II

This post will finish the examination of the melancholic temperament by looking at its "dark side" and how one with this temperament should self-train for spiritual advancement.

Dark Side of the Melancholic Temperament 

1. The melancholic by committing sin falls into the most terrible distress of mind, because in the depth of his heart he is, more than those of other temperaments, filled with a longing desire for God, with a keen perception of the malice and consequences of sin. The consciousness of being separated from God by mortal sin has a crushing effect upon him. If be falls into grievous sin, it is hard for him to rise again, because confession, in which he is bound to humiliate himself deeply. is so hard for him. 

He is also in great danger of falling back into sin; because by his continual brooding over the sins committed he causes new temptations to arise. When tempted he indulges in sentimental moods, thus increasing the danger and the strength of temptations. To remain in a state of sin or even occasionally to relapse into sin may cause him a profound and lasting sadness, and rob him gradually of confidence in God and in himself. He says to himself: "I have not the strength to rise again and God does not help me either by His grace, for He does not love me but wants to damn me." This fatal condition can easily assume the proportion of despair.

2. A melancholic person who has no confidence in God and love for the cross falls into great despondency, inactivity, and even into despair. If he has confidence in God and love for the Crucified, he is led to God and sanctified more quickly by suffering mishaps, calumniation, unfair treatment, etc. But if these two virtues are lacking, his condition is very dangerous and pitiable. If sufferings, although little in themselves, befall him, the melancholic person, who has no confidence in God and love for Christ, becomes downcast and depressed, ill-humored and sensitive. He does not speak, or he speaks very little, is peevish and disconsolate and keeps apart from his fellow men. Soon he loses courage to continue his work, and interest even in his professiona1 occupation. He feels that he has nothing but sorrow and grief. finally this disposition may culminate in actua1 despondency and despair.

3. The melancholic who gives way to sad moods, falls into many faults against charity and becomes a real burden to his fellow men:

a) He easily loses confidence in his fellow men, (especially Superiors, Confessors), because of slight defects which he discovers in them, or on account of corrections in small matters.

 b) He is vehemently exasperated and provoked by disorder or injustice. The cause of his exasperation is often justifiable, but rarely to the degree felt.

 c) He can hardly forgive offenses. The first offense he ignores quite easily. But renewed offenses penetrate deeply into the soul and can hardly be forgotten. Strong aversion easily takes root in his heart against persons from whom he has suffered, or in whom be finds this or that fault. This aversion becomes so strong that he can hardly see these persons without new excitement, that he does not want to speak to them and is exasperated by the very thought of them. Usually this aversion is abandoned only after the melancholic is separated from persons who incurred his displeasure and at times only after months or even years.

d) He is very suspicious. He rarely trusts people and is always afraid that others have a grudge against him. Thus he often and without cause entertains uncharitable and unjust suspicion suspicion about his neighbor, conjectures evil intentions, and fears dangers which do not exist at all. 

e) He sees everything from the dark side. He is peevish, always draws attention to the serious side of affairs, complains regularly about the perversion of people, bad times, downfall of morals, etc. His motto is: Things grow worse all along. Offenses, mishaps, obstacles he always considers much worse than they really are. The consequence is often excessive sadness, unfounded vexation about others, brooding for weeks and weeks on account of real or imaginary insults. 

Melancholic persons who give way to this disposition to look at everything through a dark glass, gradually become pessimists, that is, persons who always expect a bad result; hypochondriacs, that is, persons who complain continually of insignificant ailments and constantly fear grave sickness; misanthropes, that is, persons who suffer from fear and hatred of men.

f) He finds peculiar difficulties in correcting people. As said above he is vehemently excited at the slightest disorder or injustice and feels obliged to correct such disorders, but at the same time he has very little skill or courage in making corrections. He deliberates long on how to express the correction; but when he is about to make it, the words fail him, or he goes about it so carefully, so tenderly and reluctantly that it can hardly be called a correction. 

If the melancholic tries to master his timidity, he easily falls into the opposite fault of shouting his correction excitedly, angrily, in unsuited or scolding words, so that again his reproach loses its effect. This difficulty is the besetting cross of melancholic superiors. They are unable to discuss things with others, therefore, they swallow their grief and permit many disorders to creep in, although their conscience recognizes the duty to interfere. 

Melancholic educators, too, often commit the fault of keeping silent too long about a fault of their charges and when at last they are forced to speak, they do it in such an tuliortunate and harsh manner, that the pupils become discouraged and frightened by such admonitions, instead of being encouraged and directed.

Spiritual Self-Training for the Melancholic Person

1. The melancholic must cultivate great confidence in God and love for suffering, for his spiritual and temporal welfare depend on these two virtues. Confidence in God and love of the Crucified are the two pillars on which he will rest so firmly, that he will not succumb to the most severe trials arising from his temperament. The misfortune of the melancholic consists in refusing to carry his cross; his salvation will be found in the voluntary and joyful bearing of that cross.

 Therefore, he should meditate often on the Providence of God, and the goodness of the Heavenly Father, who sends sufferings only for our spiritual welfare, and he must practice a fervent devotion to the Passion of Christ and His Sorrowful Mother Mary.

2. He should always, especially during attacks of melancholy, say to himself: "It is not so bad as I imagine. I see things too darkly," or "I am a pessimist."

 3. He must from the very beginning resist every feeling of aversion, diffidence, discouragement, or despondency. so that these evil impressions can take no root in the soul. 

4. He must keep himself continually occupied, so that he finds no time for brooding. Persevering work will master all. 

5. He is bound to cultivate the good side of his temperament and especially his inclination to interior life and his sympathy for suffering fellow men. He must struggle continually against his weaknesses.

6. St. Theresa devotes an entire chapter to the treatment of malicious melancholies. She writes: ''Upon close observation you will notice that melancholic persons are especially inclined to have their own way, to say everything that comes into their mind, to watch for the faults of others in order to hide their own and to find peace in that which is according to their own liking." 

St. Theresa, in this chapter touches upon two points to which the melancholic person must pay special attention. He frequently is much excited, full of disgust and bitterness, because he occupies himself too much with the faults of others, and again because he would like to have everything according to his own will and notion. He can get into bad humor and discouragement on account of the most insignificant things.

 If be feels very downcast be should ask himself whether be concerned himself too much about the faults of others. Let other people have their own way! Or whether perhaps things do not go according to his own will. Let him learn the truth of the words of the Imitation (1,22), "Who is there that has all things according to his will? Neither I nor you, nor any man on earth. There is no man in the world without some trouble or affliction be he king or pope. Who then is the best off? Truly he that is able to suffer something for the love of God."


Important Training Points to Remember

In the treatment of the melancholic special attention must be given to the following points: 1. It is necessary to have a sympathetic understanding of the melancholic. In his entire deportment he presents many riddles to those who do not understand the peculiarities of the melancholic temperament. It is necessary, therefore, to study it and at the same time to find out how this temperament manifests itself in each individual. Without this knowledge great mistakes cannot be avoided. 

2. It is necessary to gain the confidence of the melancholic person. This is not at all easy and can be done only by giving him a good example in everything and by manifesting an unselfish and sincere love for him. Like an unfolding bud opens to the sun, so the heart of the melancholic person opens to the sunshine of kindness and love. 

3. One must always encourage him. Rude reproach, harsh treatment, hardness of heart cast him down and paralyze his efforts. Friendly advice and patience with his slow actions give him courage and vigor. He will show himself very grateful for such kindness. 

4. It is well to keep him always busy, but do not overburden him with work. 

5. Since melancholies take everything to heart and are very sensitive, they are in great danger of weakening their nerves. It is necessary, therefore, to watch nervous troubles of those entrusted to one's care. Melancholies who suffer a nervous breakdown are in a very bad state and cannot recover very easily.

 6. In the training of a melancholic child, special care must be taken to be always kind and friendly, to encourage and keep him busy. The child, moreover, must be taught always to pronounce words properly, to use his five senses, and to cultivate piety. Special care must be observed in the punishment of the melancholic child, otherwise obstinacy and excessive reserve may result. Necessary punishment must be given with precaution and great kindness and the slightest appearance of injustice must be carefully avoided.

Conclusion

This concludes what theologians Schagemann and Hock had written about the melancholic temperament. Once more, all of the content is theirs and none comes from me. I hope this post and the last gave you insight to the melancholic person--especially if you happen to be one. These were the major points the theologians made. When the fourth post in this series comes out, it will deal with the phlegmatic temperament.

32 comments:

  1. Love these! I have been trying to figure myself out for a long time!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. John,
      Thank you! Many people requested a series of posts on the Four Temperaments so they can "figure themselves out," so to speak!

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. Thank you Introibo! It is a tragedy for a child to grow up in a family where he is continuously misunderstood and falsely judged. This can really help parents be more effective in raising their children properly.

      Delete
    3. John,
      I agree! Traditionalist parents should be most aware of the four temperaments.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  2. I have read this before, but thank you for the reminder. I am strongly melancholic (last assessment I took put me at 80-90%). One of the most difficult things for me is to maintain an attitude of cheerful resignation. Perhaps that is why I have prayed for many years that a certain suffering in my life would be removed and yet it remains. Perhaps I have a great need to develop the habit of cheerful resignation, and my suffering is the means God has chosen. Please pray for me. I will pray to our Lady for all of you who read this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon2:06
      I will pray for you and I ask all my readers to do the same! Don't despair, God will not fail you. Pray for grace and final perseverance (as we all should).

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. @anon2:06
      I, too, am of a melancholic temperament, and I believe I understand your suffering. Your resolution of cheerful resignation is truly edifying and and in my view, a good path.

      I have a strong devotion to St. Therese of Lisieux who is also my Confirmation saint. Many spiritual masters have surmised that she was of a melancholic temperament. I recommend her autobiography “the Story of a Soul,” her “Last Conversations”and letters. Her doctrine of spiritual childhood has inspired millions to aspire to sainthood.

      @Introibo, I have a book on the 4 Temperaments, and find this series quite helpful. Thank you. In my case, the recommendation to focus on Christ Crucified and total confidence in God have been life changing. Also, the spiritual classic “the Spiritual Combat”is one of the best and most helpful books I’ve read.

      I will pray for you, Anon!

      Alanna

      Delete
    3. Alanna,
      I'm glad you find this series helpful. Fr. Scupoli's "Spiritual Combat" was a huge help to me and one of my favorite Catholic books. I recommend it to all without reservation.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  3. Introibo

    May I ask what would be the best books you would suggest to someone who is interested to know more about what has happened to the Church after Vatican Two ?

    God bless

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon3:06
      In my opinion, the Radecki brother (both priests) have the three best books to begin. "What Has Happened To The Catholic Church," Vatican II Exposed As Counterfeit Catholicism," and "Tumultuous Times." I also recommend the pamphlet (available at traditionalmass.org for free) by Fr. Cekada (RIP), "Traditionalists, Infallibility, and the Pope."

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  4. This temperament probably best describes me. Someone mentioned St. Therese of Lisieux and her "Little Way" is something which has been growing on my mind lately.

    God Bless and thanks for this!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. cairsahr__stjoseph,
      Glad you find it helpful, my friend!

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  5. Thank you, Intro.

    I happened to see this just when I can use
    the information, being a melancholic who is in a bit of a rough patch right now.
    You said your final post on this series will be on the phlegmatic.
    I read your post on the choleric but I think I may have missed the one on the sanguine.
    Do you have a link, please?
    You do such good work!

    Thanks again, and God bless!

    -Jannie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jannie,
      Not to worry, I have more posts in this series! My first post was a general overview and introduction to the temperaments. My second and third posts were about the melancholic. The next two will be the phlegmatic, then two on the choleric, and finally two on the sanguine!

      This is post #3 in the series. Posts #1 and two links are below:
      Introduction: https://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2024/02/the-four-temperaments-introduction.html

      Melancholic Part I:
      https://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2024/03/the-four-temperaments-melancholic-part-i.html

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  6. I also want to let your readers know I keep them in my prayers regularly, too.
    Thank you, again!

    -Jannie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jannie,
      As I keep you and all my readers in my prayers as well; and I remember you all especially every Sunday at the Most Holy sacrifice of the Mass!

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  7. Introibo,

    thank you so much for this post! I most probably wouldn't have found the manuals you used by Schagemann and Hock were it not for your writing.

    Getting to grips with being a melancholic is a tough realization to make. A sanguine person will be considered a good sport and a party animal, popular with people and likeable; a choleric is a natural leader, ambitious, and efficient but a melancholic? A slacker and a grouch by natural inclinations - not the kind of man anyone would like to have for a friend.

    In a world where there is so much to complain about it'll surely take a lot of God's graces for a melancholic person if he wishes to maintain some level of sanity. If his parents failed in their parenthood, it'll take nothing short of a miracle of God's grace for a melancholic child to lead some kind of a balanced and useful life as an adult (not to mention finding the True Faith in an age of universal apostasy).
    All in all, it's possible - I've seen that myself. Can't thank you enough for your work!

    God Bless You,
    Joanna

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joanna, thank you for this post and for your guest blogs. Your analysis of the melancholic temperament is so true, and can lead to lifelong struggles. Parents have a huge influence here. I was blessed with a mother who understood me and provided necessary guidance such as introducing me at a very young age to St. Therese’s autobiography and a book on saints for girls.

      Now I consider myself a penitent, finding cultural pressure and influence too much to withstand, and making mistakes fatal to my temperament, “following my heart..”I still foster my devotion to St. Therese but also to St. Mary Magdalene and St. Margaret of Cortona.

      I feel so fortunate to have discovered Introibo’s blog, learning so much from him and his readers.

      Alanna

      Delete
    2. Joanna and Alanna,
      Thank you so much for your kind words! Comments like yours keep me writing.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  8. Joanna and Alanna
    Thank you both for your terrific comments; what you said is very insightful and helpful for working through the tendency to pessimism that is a trademark of this temperament!
    So I really like your idea of taking the "mistake-making" saints as patrons for the melancholic.
    My favorites have always been St Bernadette and St Teresa of Avila because of the great things they accomplished for God. But they are sanguines, so for those of the melancholic temperament to try to emulate their style in striving for holiness could be self-defeating and too much pressure.

    -Jannie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jannie, thank you for the kind words. I believe St. Teresa of Avila emphasized the importance of self-knowledge for growth in the spiritual life. I love and admire St. Ignatius Loyola, often considered to be choleric, the total opposite to my melancholic temperament. Yet I found that his Exercises daunting.

      It’s only due to my loving and wise mother that I found my lifetime devotion to St. Therese of Lisieux and her way of total confidence, although it doesn’t come naturally. I do believe in the merit of having heavenly guides similar to us in temperament and understanding of our earthly struggles.

      Looking forward to the remainder of Introibo’s series on the temperaments.

      Delete
  9. It is so nice to hear from Joanna Introibo . Prayers for all .

    Paul

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Paul,
      Yes, I love Joanna's comments and I hope she will guest post again sometime soon! Our prayers for you as well, my friend.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  10. Greetings, I am the young man from Spain. Weeks ago I left a few questions on the blog, but for personal reasons I haven't logged in much and I didn't visit the blog, so I couldn't see if anyone had answered me, and I don't know where I left my questions either. From here I apologize for this, and I promise to read the responses of those who respond to the following, be it Introibo or any other friendly reader.

    My questions would be the following, I know that for many I ask the obvious but my ignorance is enormous:

    - On many occasions I read sedevacantist authors stating the following: "theologians and saints like Saint Robert Bellarmine have spoken out: if a pope or supposed pope falls into heresy, he automatically stops being pope." Why then did a pope prior to the VII not establish mechanisms or legislate so that this could be put into practice? Thus, the entire Church would assume, starting with the cardinals, that if a pope is a heretic - for example, Roncalli or John XXIII - he should not be obeyed and the mechanisms planned by a previous pope for his deposition would begin. Since this has not been the case, we have multiple popes or supposed popes spreading error and heresy and false doctrines without anyone being able to do anything. Until we get to Francis. And when you quote the theologians and saints that I mentioned at the beginning, they answer: "they were other times."

    If I say something stupid, please warn me.

    - - When I went to mass, in part of it we said: "I have sinned a lot in thought, word, deed and omission." I would like to focus on thinking and omission:

    - If a person with obsessive problems has frequent sinful thoughts, how can he avoid it so as not to sin? I feel sorry for people who suffer from problems like OCD, and ugly images come to their heads that they can't avoid. It's like, for example, that catchy music that takes a while to get out of your head without intending to, and the song has lyrics that induce sin, but they have played it on the street, you listen to it and it takes a while to go away. It is very difficult not to err on the side of thinking for many people at times.

    - To what extent does sin by omission go? That is to say, if I find a hungry person on the street and I don't feed him or her immediately, am I sinning by omission? I don't know if I understand it.

    Thank you very much.

    Young reader from Spain

    ReplyDelete
  11. Young Reader From Spain,
    1. Many of the theologians and popes thought that a false pope scenario was not likely. Nevertheless, Pope Paul IV DID legislate for such a possibility--in Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio.
    It reads in pertinent part:
    "Adding that if at any time it will be found that some bishop, even conducting himself as an archbishop or
    patriarch or already mentioned cardinal of the Roman Church, even, as shown, a legate, or even a Roman Pontiff,
    before his promotion or assumption as cardinal or as Roman Pontiff had deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen
    into some heresy, before his promotion or assumption as Cardinal or as Roman Pontiff, that promotion or
    assumption concerning him, even if made in concord and from the unanimous assent of all the cardinals, is null,
    void and worthless; not by the reception of consecration, not by the ensuing possession of the office and
    administration, or as if, either the enthronement or homage of the Roman Pontiff, or the obedience given to him by
    all, and the length of whatever time in the future, can be said to have recovered power or to be able to recover
    power, nor can (the assumption or promotion) be considered as legitimate in any part of it, and for those who are
    promoted as bishops or archbishops or patriarchs or assumed as primates, or as cardinals or even as Roman Pontiff,
    no faculty of administration in spiritual or temporal matters may be thought to have been attributed or to attribute,
    but may all things and each thing in any way said, done, effected and administered and then followed up in any way
    through them lack power and they are not able to attribute any further power nor right to anyone; and they
    themselves who are thus promoted and assumed by that very fact, without any further declaration to be made, are
    deprived of every dignity, place, honor, title, authority, function and power; and yet it is permitted to all and each so
    promoted and assumed, if they have not deviated from the Faith before nor have been heretics, nor have incurred or
    excited or committed schism."

    2. Abnormal or pathological brain states such as OCD lessen the voluntariness of the act, and therefore, the malice/severity of the sin. As long as the person is getting treatment and doing all they can (as instructed by their Confessor) those sins would not be mortal. (See e.g., theologians Mc Hugh and Callan, Moral Theology, [1929], 1:15-29).

    3. A sin of omission is an act of the will whereby a person chooses not to do something that he is obliged to do. For example, we have a positive duty to attend Mass on Sunday and Holy Days of Obligation, when such is possible. To fail to do it, would be mortally sinful. In your hypothetical, there is an obligation to help the less fortunate. Whether or not you sin is dependent upon such factors as e.g., (a) having the means to help him; (b) thinking he may be mentally ill and dangerous, so afraid to approach him; (c) seeing him frequently and having good reason to suspect it to be a scam, etc.

    If you have the means to provide him with a meal and refer him to a homeless shelter in safety, you are obliged to do so.

    (See e.g., theologian Connell, Outlines of Moral Theology, [1958], pg. 14 for a brief definition).

    God Bless,

    ---Introibo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Introibo, although unfortunately Paul IV's decision did not seem to have any practical effect when Roncalli was elected and began promoting heresies like John XXIII. How did cardinals like Ottaviani not appeal to Paul IV's legislation? How did no cardinal or bishop in general do it, and allow him to do everything he did?

      Thank you immensely.

      Young reader from Spain.

      Delete
    2. Young Reader From Spain,
      Many people did not want to believe it was happening. Paul IV simply legislated what is already true by Divine Law; a heretic cannot become the pope. He feared the one of his Cardinals might be a secret Lutheran, and wanted to forewarn all.

      Some did adopt sedevacantism from at least 1964, such as theologian (later Bishop) Guerard des Laurier. Add to the problem the infiltration of the Modernists, who wanted a false Modernist "pope," and you can begin to see the problem.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    3. Greetings Introibo, thank you very much again. Can I ask something related to the topic in question? It turns out that Bishop Schneider has published a book in which he states the following:

      "Bishop Schneider believes that already "Pius X was not always vigilant enough in the selection of the candidates for the cardinalate."

      He refers to the appointment of Archbishop Giacomo della Chiesa just three months before Pius X's death. It proved to be fateful: "A disciple of the well-known liberal Cardinal Rampolla, he became, as Pope Benedict XV, the successor of Pius X."

      Archbishop Giacomo della Chiesa did not agree with the policies of Pius X:

      "During the pontificate of Benedict , where the vast majority of the episcopate was already infected with uncritical sympathies for theological liberalism."

      https://gloria.tv/post/6hpqi7gnAg2AAGkudPbAebZB3

      I would like to ask if it is true or not, since Schneider has become a reference figure for a sector of the traditionalists of the Church that I call "official" - Catholic for the majority - and if it is false, it deceives many people. Thank you!

      Young reader from Spain

      Delete
    4. Young Reader from Spain,
      No pope is protected by the Holy Ghost from making bad appointments. There are always machinations going on with clerics whose ambitions get the better of them. To blame one of the greatest pope-saints in the history of the Church (St. Pius X) of "not being vigilant enough" is disingenuous at best.

      Pope Benedict XV (reigned 1914-1922) was a good and holy Pontiff. He was in no way heretical or "liberal." His mistake was not realizing the extent of the Modernist threat, thinking it was mostly over.

      If Schneider knew what he was talking about, he'd be a Traditionalist.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    5. Thank you very much! Your answers help me a lot!

      Young reader from Spain

      Delete
  12. I recently reread this quote by St. Alphonsus de Liguori: "God is displeased at the diffidence of souls who love Him sincerely and whom He Himself loves."

    Introibo, thank you for putting all of this information together in your post. You’ve given us lots to ponder. I’ve certainly taken some notes, as I am at least a bit melancholic.

    “He is very suspicious. He rarely trusts people…” I feel like I’ve had enough experiences to warrant my generally suspicious nature, although I call it being cautious. ;-D

    A friend reminded me recently that the particular sufferings we endure, are given to us by God as the unique means of our salvation, as He knows what is best for each one of us. I must remind myself more often of this.

    Great commentary by everyone. Looking forward to the post on the phlegmatic temperament. I’ve enjoyed the recent posts here, as well as the CFP interview.

    Could anyone recommend a good online temperament test?

    God Bless you and your readers,
    -Seeking Truth

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seeking Truth,
      The test linked below seems OK. I do not **endorse** any such online tests however.
      https://bestpersonalitytests.com/four-temperaments-test/

      God Bless, my friend

      ---Introibo

      Delete