In St. Jude 1:3, we read, "Dearly beloved, taking all care to write unto you concerning your common salvation, I was under a necessity to write unto you: to beseech you to contend earnestly for the faith once delivered to the saints." [Emphasis mine]. Contending For The Faith is a series of posts dedicated to apologetics (i.e., the intellectual defense of the truth of the Traditional Catholic Faith) to be published the first Monday of each month. This is the next installment.
Sadly, in this time of Great Apostasy, the faith is under attack like never before, and many Traditionalists don't know their faith well enough to defend it. Remember the words of our first pope, "But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect..." (1Peter 3:16). There are five (5) categories of attacks that will be dealt with in these posts. Attacks against:
- The existence and attributes of God
- The truth of the One True Church established by Christ for the salvation of all
- The truth of a particular dogma or doctrine of the Church
- The truth of Catholic moral teaching
- The truth of the sedevacantist position as the only Catholic solution to what has happened since Vatican II
In addition, controversial topics touching on the Faith will sometimes be featured, so that the problem and possible solutions may be better understood. If anyone had suggestions for topics that would fall into any of these categories, you may post them in the comments. I cannot guarantee a post on each one, but each will be carefully considered.
Trans-ing Children to Death
On August 27, 2025, Robert Westman went to Annunciation School's church in Minneapolis (Vatican II sect) and shot through the windows. Two children aged eight and ten were killed in the attack and at least 17 other victims -- 14 children and 3 adults -- were injured before Westman turned the gun on himself, according to authorities. Robert had his name changed to Robin and "identified as female." This was done with permission of his mother, Mary, who signed to allow it when Westman was 17 years old.
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said during a press conference Wednesday, “anybody who is using this as an opportunity to villainize our trans community or any other community out there has lost their sense of common humanity” and urged people to instead honor the children who were harmed.
The Westmans appear to have had close ties to Annunciation. O’Hara said in an interview on CNN Thursday morning that Westman both attended school at Annunciation and was a parishioner there.
(See https://www.mprnews.org/story/2025/08/28/annunciation-shooter-appeared-to-have-fascination-with-mass-killings).
Mayor Frey has it all wrong. Anyone who doesn't stop "transgender" insanity has lost their faith (if they ever had it) and their marbles--just like the "trans-people" themselves. If we want to honor the children harmed, we will begin by stopping the brainwashing of children and enabling perverse mental illness.
This post will show just how dangerous the LGBTQIA+ perversion is as it threatens us all.
WARNING! This post contains some discussion of abuse and sensitive matters that some may find disturbing. Reader discretion is advised---Introibo
(N.B. This post is a compilation of all the resources, both online and print, which I used in my research. I take no credit for any of the information herein. All I did was condense the information into a terse and readable post---Introibo).
What is "Gender Theory"?
Gender dysphoria is defined as the condition of feeling one's emotional and psychological identity as male or female to be opposite to one's biological sex. It is a mental disorder which we are being asked to accept as normal, while those who oppose it are to be considered bigoted (at best) or having a neurosis or "phobia" (at worst). Children and adults who suffer from gender dysphoria deserve our sympathy and professional help to get better. Now, gender dysphoria has morphed into something to be encouraged and celebrated as "transgenderism."
To understand trans-insanity," one must first understand gender theory. It is the false and unscientific idea that each person is made up of different aspects of each gender. It is broken down as follows:
- Sex has to do with the body/biology (genitals, chromosomes, etc.)
- Gender Identity concerns the "self-awareness" of who you are "in your head"
- Gender Expression is how someone presents themselves to others in terms of clothes, actions, mannerisms, etc.
- Attraction is who or what someone is attracted to sexually; men, women, even animals (beastiality)
Allegedly, everyone has a gender identity which may or may not conform with their biological sex.
The Four Falsehoods of Gender Theory
1. Binary is bad.
The claim: There are more than two genders.
The truth: God created male and female--period. It is the very basis of the sodomites' "LGBT" label. Lesbians are women attracted to other women. "Gays" are men attracted to other men. Bisexuals are men or women attracted to both men and women. Transgenders are men or women who want to live as the opposite sex.
2. Gender is a spectrum.
The claim: There are many different genders on a whole spectrum of identity.
The truth: There are many different ways we express masculinity and femininity because we are all different people. That doesn't imply there are roughly seven billion different genders. The reality remains that we are male or female. According to ABC News, there are 58 genders (See eroscoaching.com/2017/06/58-gender-options/). Does anyone even know what "Two-Spirit" means and how it differs from being "Genderqueer" or "Neutrois"? Sheer insanity.
3. Man and Woman are merely "social constructs"
The claim: The social roles of men and women differ according to time, place, and culture. There is nothing objective about those terms.
The truth: Social roles may change, but sexual differentiation is based on biological facts, not social constructs.
4. Gender identity is separate from biological sex.
The claim: How we live our lives is independent from our genitalia.
The truth: A comprehensive survey of the scientific evidence was published in 2016 in The New Atlantis. It discussed over 200 peer-reviewed studies in the biological, psychological, and social sciences. It concluded:
The hypothesis that gender identity is an innate, fixed property of human beings that is independent of biological sex--that a person might be "a man trapped in a woman's body," or a "woman trapped in a man's body"---is not supported by scientific evidence. (See Meyer and McHugh, "Sexuality and Gender: Findings from the Biological, Psychological, and Social Sciences," The New Atlantic: A Journal of Technology & Society, 50, Fall 2016, pg. 8; Emphasis mine).
The Invented Vocabulary of a Warped Ideology
The following words and phrases are made up by gender theorists to make them sound as if what they are peddling is real instead of jabberwocky.
Assigned at Birth: This made up phrase refers to the sex given on a person's birth certificate. It's as if some nurse puts a label in an arbitrary and capricious manner on a baby. The obvious attempt is to, once more, dissociate biological sex from gender. To label a child with male genitalia as a boy and female genitalia as a girl is biologically factual regardless of what that child may "feel like" in the future. Only in rare instances of a child born with a true intersex condition, having genitals of an ambiguous nature, would the term really apply.
Cisgender: "Cis" means "on the same side" implying that your gender lines up with your biological sex and plays into the lie that they can be separated. If anyone asks me if I'm cisgender, I always reply, "No, I'm a man."
Preferred Gender Pronouns (PGPs) and Gender Neutral Pronouns (GNPs): This allows men who consider themselves women to call themselves "she" and "her" while women who think they are men can call themselves "he" and "his." Gender neutral pronouns such as "they" and "them" are also used. About a year ago, I was reading an article in the New York Times. A trans-pervert was stopped from going somewhere and it read, "They were refused entry." As someone who reads English it was confusing because I thought several people were prevented from going some place when it was just one person. There are also made up pronouns like ze (pronounced "ZEE") and hir (pronounced "HEAR.").
Transphobic: A fictitious mental disorder by which people who don't believe there are 58 genders and you can "pick your pronouns" are thereby psychologically unsound, hateful, and bigoted. It is a way to bully Christians and those with traditional values not to speak out or else they will face consequences.
Some Inherent Contradictions in Gender Theory:
- Gender Theorists want gender dysphoria not regarded as a mental illness, but as something to be celebrated. This includes "transition surgery" at a time when insurance and health professionals should concentrate on cancer, heart disease, COVID, and never on unnecessary surgery to further the cause of mental and/or moral problems
- Gender Theorists insist that "gender is fluid," yet once you have surgery the damage is done permanently--there is no "going back." How is this "fluid"?
- The idea of "gender fluidity" being natural, goes contrary to surgical intervention. It doesn't "just happen naturally" as is claimed
Gender Theory's Origin: Perversion and Marxism
There are ten (10) individuals who made Gender Theory a force in modern society. I want to cite E.S. Williams, Lessons in Depravity, [2003],for much of the information in this section.
1. Karl Ulrichs (1825-1895)
A nineteenth century German jurist and sodomite who campaigned for "homosexual rights." He advanced an esoteric and occult idea that homosexuality was innate because there was a female soul trapped in a man's body and vice-versa for lesbians. The term “Uranian” had been coined in the 1860s by the German Karl Heinrich Ulrichs, who used “Uranian” (frequently Germanised as Urning) to signify those who experienced “a congenital reversal of sexual feeling”. “Uranian” was also a term much used in astrological and esoteric circles – usually in reference to the planet Uranus, which was associated with “awakening the soul from lethargy, and bringing it into strange conditions and hazardous enterprises”. Esoterically, at the time, the influence of Uranus was very much bound up with the idea that human culture was entering a New Age.(See http://enfolding.org/occult-gender-regimes-reincarnation-and-uranian-souls-in-the-nineteenth-century/; Emphasis mine).
2. Sigmund Freud (1856-1939)
The so-called "Father of Psychoanalysis," was an Austrian atheist who denied children had a latency period but were sexual from birth. God was a projection for the need of a father-figure, and shame regarding sex acts of any persuasion were not healthy. Freud's Projection Theory commits the genetic fallacy in logic. This occurs when you try to discredit an idea based on its origin. Even if belief in God came from an unconscious desire for a father-figure, this doesn't prove God non-existent. Perhaps the very reason we have such a desire is because Our Creator made it innate within us to seek Him out. But was Freud a man who "had it all together" and was a convinced atheist? Dr. Paul Vitz, a former professor of psychology at New York University, and a former atheist himself, gives us some insight into Freud in his book Sigmund Freud's Christian Unconscious. [1988]
Here are some interesting facts on the "Father of Psychotherapy:"
- Freud was very interested in occult phenomena such as telepathy and poltergeists
- On Saturday evenings, he would frequently play tarock - a form of a tarot card game associated with the Jewish Kabbala
- In 1937, when he was urged to flee Nazism, he responded that his real enemy was the Roman Catholic Church
- Was a cocaine addict and his excuse was "I was making frequent use of cocaine to reduce some troublesome nasal swellings."
- The Catholic psychiatrist Gregory Zilboorg concluded: "Religion was, for Freud, a field of which he knew very little and which moreover seems to have been the very center of his inner conflicts, conflicts that were never resolved."
(See also The Freudian Fallacy: Freud and Cocaine by E M Thornton [1986]).
3. Magnus Hirschfeld (1894-1956)
Hirschfeld was a sodomite doctor and activist. He founded the Institute for Sexual Science at Berlin in 1919. He oversaw the first "sex reassignment surgeries." The most famous was that of Einar Wegener portrayed in the 2015 movie The Danish Girl. Hirschfeld believed all people were a mixture of male and female. In 1930, he gave the first scientific lecture on "transsexualism."
4. Alfred Kinsey (1894-1956)
Alfred Charles Kinsey, was raised the son of a strict Methodist Sunday School teacher. He went to Bowdoin College where he majored in zoology, and developed a fascination with insects. He continued his studies at Harvard after graduation. He eventually severed all ties with his parents, and declared himself an atheist. Some of his biographers portray him as shy and disinterested in sex, but later biographers unearthed Kinsey's personal correspondence, wherein it was revealed he was a bisexual with a strong sexual desire for young boys.
His career as a "sexpert" began when the Association of Women Students at Indiana University (where he taught zoology/biology) asked him to teach a marriage course on human sexuality for engaged and married students. Kinsey went to great lengths to keep his personal dark predilections a secret. When Ralph Voris, one of his best friends, died, Kinsey drove from Indiana to Ohio with his wife Clara. He had a wife and kids as a "cover" for his deviance. Once in Ohio, he removed correspondence from Voris' office in which Kinsey brags to Voris about his collection of "gorgeous" photos of homosexual men.
Kinsey revolutionized the world with the publication of his books Sexual Behavior in the Human Male and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (published in 1948 and 1953, respectively). It was based on 350 questions on a questionnaire that asked such things as when (not if ) the interviewees had participated in sado-masochism, homosexual acts, pedophilia, and bestiality. His assistants, Clyde Martin, Paul Gebhard, and Wardell Pomeroy, were all required to be filmed performing sex acts with others either at the university or in the attic of the Kinsey home. The questions were so sick, that most of the respondents were either those who engaged in unnatural sex acts or were incarcerated sex offenders. The peer-reviewed medical journal The Lancet decried the research as having "questioned an unrepresentative proportion of prison inmates and sex offenders in a survey of normal sexual behavior." In a 1992 telephone interview, Paul Gebhard, one of Kinsey's assistants, admitted that some of the men interviewed were convicted pedophiles.
As a result of his pseudo-scientific research, the American public began to see homosexuality and pornography as normal. Kinsey believed no sex act was unnatural, nothing was off-limits, and you could define your sexuality any way you wanted. He even approved of beastiality.
5. Harry Benjamin (1885-1986)
Benjamin was an associate of Kinsey. In 1966, he wrote the first textbook on transsexualism. In the book, he argued that Darwinian evolution proved gender fluidity, and pioneered the idea that if someone thought they were the wrong sex, the body should be made to align to the thoughts rather than helping them mentally so their mind would conform to objective biological reality. Benjamin (like Kinsey) endorsed a book by their friend Rene Guyon, The Ethics of Sexual Acts, [1948], which advocated pedophilia and its decriminalization.
6. Wilhelm Reich (1897-1957)
An Austrian medical doctor and psychoanalyst, Reich taught that suffering and cruelty in society are due to Christian morality. In his 1933 book, The Mass Psychology of Fascism, he argued that fascism arose from sexual oppression. He was pressured to leave Catholic Austria and came to the United States where he promoted sex education for children, so they could become sexually active and "liberated." In the 1940s he promoted divorce, contraception, abortion, and promiscuity. He eventually settled in Arizona where he came to believe that the planet was under attack by UFOs and his father was an extraterrestrial.
7. John Money (1921-2006)
A psychiatry professor, Money campaigned to legalize pedophilia and the "freedom to change gender." He co-founded the Johns Hopkins Gender Identity Clinic. His most famous case involved David Reimer, whose circumcision had gone wrong. Money pressured the boy's parents to agree to an experimental surgery in order to "change the little boy into a girl." Money wanted to prove gender is all about socialization and not biology. Since David had a twin brother named Brian, if David (now called Brenda) could be successfully raised as a girl, while twin brother Brian would be a boy, his theory would be vindicated.
It would be later revealed that Money forced the two children to engage in incestuous acts with each other while he photographed them. When David found out the truth about being a boy, he wanted to transition back. Not being able to do so, he tragically committed suicide at age 38. As a result of the abuse, Brian became a drug addict and died from an overdose at age 36. (See David van Gend, Stealing from a Child: The Injustice of "Marriage Equality."[2016], pgs. 152-153).
8. Robert Stoller (1924-1991)
A Professor of Psychiatry at UCLA, Stoller presented his ideas that gender and biological sex are distinct and separate in his influential book Sex and Gender (1968). He denied that there was any distinction between normal and perverted sex; the only thing that is wrong is to infringe on the rights of other people.
9. Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937)
An Italian Marxist, Gramsci believed in the complete overthrow of Christian morals in society. Complete license to act as you wish (especially in sexual matters) was of paramount importance, and must only be curtailed when absolutely necessary by the State. You achieve this by distancing youself from the label of Marxism, and use the language of "equality" and "freedom."
10. Herbert Marcuse (1898-1979)
Marcuse was a Marxist philosopher and sociologist. His lasting and destructive legacy was destroying any confidence in objective truth. He achieved this by claiming words don't actually mean anything; they are just tools to achieve what the writer or speaker wants. It is often called "critical theory" and has had great success.
The evil influence of these characters, exacerbated by the Great Apostasy of Vatican II, has brought society to a place where one can say with a straight face, "A man can be a woman and a woman can be a man."
Transgenderism is Based on the Heresy of Gnosticism
Gnosticism flourished during the second century and taught that the material world is bad and dominated by evil and ignorance, but the spirit world is good. Since a good God could not have created an evil world, Gnostics taught that the world must have been created by a flawed "God." Yet within this corrupt world remains a spiritual component, fragments of the true and good God.
In the Gnostic view, there is a true, ultimate and transcendent God, who is beyond all created universes and who never created anything in the sense in which the word "create" is ordinarily understood. While this True God did not fashion or create anything, He (or, It) "emanated" or brought forth from within Himself the substance of all there is in all the worlds, visible and invisible. In a certain sense, it may therefore be true to say that all is God, for all consists of the substance of God. By the same token, it must also be recognized that many portions of the original divine essence have been projected so far from their source that they underwent unwholesome changes in the process. To worship the cosmos, or nature, or embodied creatures is thus tantamount to worshiping alienated and corrupt portions of the emanated divine essence. (See http://gnosis.org/gnintro.htm).
This distorted worldview had a profound impact on how Gnostics perceived the human person. They believed most people possess a "divine spark," a piece of the true God, within them. However, this spark is trapped within a corrupt body, which few people recognize, and as a result, live in ignorance and attachment to the material world. A person can achieve salvation, however, by attaining secret knowledge of his or her true self and eventually leaving the prison of the body at death (If a person fails to become sufficiently enlightened, this spark again becomes imprisoned in another body.)
Some Gnostics were pagan, but many others combined it with Christianity and considered themselves to be higher and more enlightened Catholics. These "Gnostic Catholics" denied the Incarnation of Christ. After all, how could a good God possess an evil body? Instead of salvation coming through Christ's death on the cross, they taught it came through attaining secret spiritual knowledge, or "gnosis." Gnostics, therefore, would agree that what you think and feel is more real and important than your material body, and determines what's "real."
Dr. Deanna Adkins, a professor at Duke University School of Medicine and the director of the Duke Center for Child and Adolescent Gender Care (which opened in 2015), has stated, "From a medical perspective, the appropriate determinant of sex is gender identity." Does this rule apply to all mammalian species? Why should sex be determined differently in humans than in other mammals? If medical science holds that gender identity determines sex in humans, what does this mean for the use of medicinal agents that have different effects on males and females? Does the proper dosage of medicine depend on the patient’s sex or gender identity?
The American Psychological Association (APA) defines "gender identity" as “a person's internal sense of being male, female, or something else." This clearly indicates there is more than just "male and female." There are (literally) bathroom signs which read "Whichever" and show a half-male, half-female body as shown at the top of this post. The APA still classifies Gender Dysphoria (or "GD")---formerly Gender Identity Disorder (or "GID")--- as a mental disorder. Yet they tow the line of the "LGBT" activists and promote it. These LGBT perverts used massive PR and political pressure to have the APA remove homosexuality as a mental disorder. Can the removal of GID/GD as disorders be far behind? We've come a long way---away from sanity, morality, and the One True Faith.
Transgnders are Prone to Violence
Transgender Mental Problems
- People with gender dysphoria or transgender identities are more likely than the general public to engage in high-risk behaviors, which may result from or contribute to psychological disorders (or both). Some of the high-risk behavior is directly related to their desire to change sex. For example, some people who identify as transgender self-mutilate or undergo procedures in non-medical settings. (See Janice Raymond, The Transgender Empire: The Making of the She-Male, [1979], pgs. 34-35).
- High rates of suicide exist even among those who have already received gender reassignment surgery, which suggests that suicidal tendencies result from an underlying pathology. Ironically, some argue suicide is a reason for reassignment surgery.
According to the pro-sodomite
Human Rights Campaign:More than half of transgender male teens who participated in the survey reported attempting suicide in their lifetime, while 29.9 percent of transgender female teens said they attempted suicide. Among non-binary youth, 41.8 percent of respondents stated that they had attempted suicide at some point in their lives. (See https://www.hrc.org/news/new-study-reveals-shocking-rates-of-attempted-suicide-among-trans-adolescen).
A psychologically healthy person accepts the reality of his or her sexual identity. Grief and anger over one’s genetic makeup signal mental health problems that can and should be addressed through psychological counseling. The academic literature includes some clinical accounts of successful efforts to overcome gender identity problems. Decades ago, there were already findings pointing “to the possibility of psychosocial intervention as an alternative to surgery in the treatment of transsexualism.” (See David H. Barlow, Gene G. Abel, Edward B. Blanchard, “Gender Identity Change in Transsexuals,” Archives of General Psychiatry 36 [1979]).
Trans-Mass Shooters
The Westman mass shooting is the fifth such crime perpetrated by a “transgender” since 2018.
- On March 27, 2023, 28-year-old “trans man” Aiden Hale, who was born Audrey Elizabeth, murdered three nine-year-olds and three adults at the Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee.
- On November 19-20, 2022, 22-year-old Anderson Lee Aldrich, who called himself “non-binary,” murdered five and wounded 25 others at a mass shooting at the Club Q bar for homosexuals in Colorado Springs, Colorado.
- On May 7, 2019, 16-year-old “trans boy” Alec McKinney and an accomplice murdered one and wounded eight students at the STEM School Highlands Ranch in Douglas County, Colorado.
- On September 20, 2018, “trans woman” Snochia Moseley, 26, murdered four and wounded three people at the Rite Aid Distribution Center in Aberdeen, Maryland, before killing himself.
- Police stopped a massacre by a “trans man” in 2024 when they arrested Alex Ye, given name Andrea, who planned mass shootings at a high school and elementary school in Montgomery County, Maryland. Ye, 18, had written a 129-page manifesto that included the tale of a fictional “transgender” bullied into a mass shooting. In May, she was sentenced to 10 years in prison but will serve only one.
Public Schools: Promoting Mental Illness and the Violence That Follows
Students—especially young ones—look up to their teachers. Teachers know everything and are never mistaken. When classrooms are decorated with trans posters, rainbow flags, and slogans,6 it shapes students’ attitudes. One California teacher packed up the American flag in her classroom; it made her feel uncomfortable. After a student asked to which flag he should pledge allegiance, she suggested the gay pride and trans flag. (See nypost.com/2021/08/30/ca-teacher-encouraged-students-to-pledge-gay-pride-flag-video)
When an elementary school teacher displays a “pride library” in his class, with rainbow banners and books about changing pronouns, students perceive his wishes, what he hopes they’ll believe Speaking of books, entire sections of school libraries feature transgender content. The Los Angeles Unified School District received “an enormous donation of LGBTQIA-themed books” from Open Books (previously called Gender nation), an organization that celebrates transgender identities in children.
Haim Ginott, a famed child psychologist, said, “Children are like wet cement. Whatever falls on them makes an impression.” Parents should know that everything your child sees and hears shapes his/her heart, mind, and soul. Activist “educators” know that. From the youngest age, children absorb beliefs about transgenderism in their classrooms, their books, from the Disney Channel, even from their Legos.
(See cnn.com/style/article/lego-lgbtq-set-pride-intl-scli).
The bombardment of falsehoods without opportunity to question is called indoctrination.
The Vatican II Sect Supports Trans-Insanity
Bergoglio (Francis) began the full promotion of perversion, and now Prevost (Leo XIV) continues his legacy. Prevost will not rescind one iota from the "blessing" of same-sex couples and has not renounced anything his predecessor in the Vatican II sect began. To remind everyone how bad Bergoglio really was, consider:
The Vatican has announced sweeping new policies welcoming transgender people in the church’s sacramental life, further reflecting Pope Francis’ pastoral focus on LGBTQ people.
In October, Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández signed a statement, with the approval of Pope Francis, affirming that transgender people can be baptized, become official godparents, and act as a witness for weddings in the Catholic faith. That statement was made public this week, by the Vatican’s Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith and can be found here. In the last year alone, the Pope has taken many steps towards the inclusion of the LGBTQ+ community in opposition to the Catholic community of the U.S which has continually rejected such progression.
The response came as a result of what’s known as a Catholic dubia on the matter, questions brought before the pope and the appropriate Vatican office that seek a simple “yes” or “no” response in order to clarify disputed matters of Catholic teaching and practice.
GLAAD President & CEO, Sarah Kate Ellis, expressed GLAAD’s support for such inclusive steps forward: “Pope Francis’ latest LGBTQ affirmation sends an unequivocal message to political and cultural leaders around the world to end their persecution and exclusion of transgender people. Pope Francis is continuing to break down barriers that have kept LGBTQ Catholics away from full participation as members of the Roman Catholic Church and is instead calling on global leaders to create welcoming spaces for LGBTQ people.” (See GLAAD [Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Deformation] glaad.org/pope-francis-calls-for-the-inclusion-of-trans-people-in-catholic-practices).
Conclusion
Transgender children are in need of mental help, not surgical mutilation or affirmation of their illness. Education and the Vatican II sect embrace trans-insanity and promote it. Westman was failed by both (and his mother). The result was a Vatican II sect school shooting. Until gender theory is banned universally, and "transgender" children are treated for their gender dysphoria, we can expect more tragedies like Minneapolis. May God and the Blessed Virgin Mary help us.
I think one of the fundamental errors underlying transgenderism and the support it receives is the Cartesian argument “I think, therefore I am.” This leads to: “I think I am a man/woman, therefore I am a man/woman,” regardless of the biological reality of individuals. If you are a man and you think you are a woman, you are mentally ill, period ! There are no women with male genitals, nor are there any men with a uterus. And if a man has his genitals cut off and takes chemicals to look like a woman, he will not be a woman. The world has lost its faith and its reason! It asks us to listen to science about the climate but not about the reality of biological identity. And, of course, it doesn't listen to God either, who created us according to our biological identity. And the V2 sect is following the world in its march toward the abyss. These are truly dark times we are living in...
ReplyDeleteSimon
DeleteYou said it well, " The world has lost its faith and its reason!"
God Bless,
---Introibo
This mental sickness has been around for a long while but not everyone who says they are transgender are suffering from this clinical mental illness called “gender dysphoria”, many are just extreme narcissists, anti social, searching for an identity in all the wrong places, and have other mental illnesses that contribute to them becoming transgender, but where they aren’t actually “gender dysphoric”. We know this because the society has much more of them now. They weren’t just in the closet years ago and now we just have an explosion of kids being transgender. It’s because their horrible parents groom them, evil doctors encourage them, there is an industry behind it, and society isolates people, and so you have adolescents sitting in their rooms searching for an identity and craving attention and they go to very dark places. This society celebrates people embracing and living out their most debased impulses. This killer, like many others, was an extreme nihilist. The Transgenderism is sick, and there are some who have gender dysphoria, but most are just looking for a violent outlet and suffer from diabolical narcissism and it manifests with Transgenderism. We have had many pyschopathic killers in the last 25 years, most were not transgender. Transmaniacs need to be locked up, along with the loony doctors and parents, and institutions and people that cultivate and foster this insanity. Transgenderism is the symptom of a atheistic, nihilistic, consumption/production, atomized society. Who is going to give them mental help? People like the CEO of Cracker Barrel who spent tens of millions to change their logo into a sterile empty sign? This is a societal problem, and more importantly a SPIRITUAL problem!
ReplyDelete@anon0:07
DeleteExcellent comment; I agree with you. It is a spiritual battle. The spike in being "trans" is due not only to gender dysphoria, but jettisoning God and His law. God created two genders, Period. Now feelings trump biology and God's plan. Mental illness is encouraged. If a girl is a tomboy "she must be a boy in a girls body."
Although most psychopathic killers were not trans, a disproportionately high number is "LGBTQ"---mentally ill and spiritually evil.
God Bless,
---Introibo
When the narrative derides those who believe the truth as having some kind of mental condition or 'phobia', one can tell even more truth right back and refer to 'homomania' or 'transmania' as some kind of 'wanton obsession and promotion of technically incorrect ideas regarding identity, etc'.
ReplyDeletecairsahr_stjoseph
DeleteInteresting as the moral and sane are labeled with mental problems, while those with genuine mental illness and spiritual bankruptcy are encouraged and celebrated.
A sick world, my friend!
God Bless,
---Introibo
Hello Introibo
ReplyDeleteI agree with your great readers comments above.
This writing was long overdue.Thank you Introibo for all you do for us.Our world is falling apart and it's only going to get worse.I have learned some new things that I did not know but have a few books on this subject which also expose this Demonic force on souls.I could write pages on the filth of the former NZ Labour Government under the diabolical Jacinta Ahern who pushed all this LGBTQ nonsence.What a crime to brainwash everyone especially the young.
On a different note,what are your thoughts and those of your readers of a family who attends the SSPX on Sunday but send their children to a Novus Ordo school.I can't see how you could reconcile this.
God bless you Introibo and all your dear readers
TradSedeCath,NZ
It's quite simple: SSPX followers falsely believe that the Novus Ordo sect is the Catholic Church. Why shouldn't they send their children to a "Catholic" (in fact Vatican 2 sect) school when they believe it to be "Catholic"?
DeleteIt all boils down to the fact that they heretically believe the Church can defect (sic!) and still be the same Church our Lord founded. Of course, it is irreconcilable if one actually has the Catholic faith. Thanks be to God we have been given that grace and acted accordingly (perseverance is still another thing so let us never take the Faith for granted). I'm sick and tired of the SSPX playing the "we-are-the-Tradition" game when they've been in fact denying the indefectibility of the Church by their words and actions.
God Bless!
Hello
DeleteI agree with you 100 %.The SSPX have become worse then the FSSP by their complete dishonesty.Behind this great facade is a rotten corpse full of complete lies and twisted theology.I look forward to the future program on What Catholics Believe with Father Jenkins when he will take to pieces the the wacky ideas of Father Paul Robinson defense of Novus Ordo "orders".He spoke a little last week on the Truth on what happened in 1983 with himself and the other priests who were expelled.
I have no doubt that the priests who expelled in 1983 have been blessed in their work for souls.Look at all the Mass centers and missions.There is three seminaries and between the CMRI,SSPV and the sisters of Bishop Sanborn , over 200 nuns.
God bless
TradSedeCath,NZ
TradSedeCath
DeleteI agree with @anon2:50. However, it is interesting that they say to "stay away from the Novus Ordo" and their children will be exposed to it, be made to attend it, and get heretical religious instruction. Pity those poor confused children!
God Bless,
---Introibo
In every age of the church, the saints thought that they were living in the imminent end times. In the apostolic age, the apostles and disciples truly believed that Christ would return in their day, especially as the persecutions of the Jews and the Romans intensified against them. In the post-apostolic age, the persecutions that followed in the next three centuries were horrendous, causing many martyrs to shed their blood for Christ, not to mention that the Faith was being attacked from so many different sides by Nestorianism, Monophysitism, Monothelitism, Docetism, Donatism, Sabellianism, Apollinarism, Manichaeism, Patripassianism, Gnosticism, Collyridianism, and worst of all Arianism (not to mention many other heresies). In the medieval age, Islam and Albigensianism were causing massive destruction and many Christians wondered if this was indeed the end? St. Vincent Ferrer, probably the greatest miracle worker in the Catholic Church’s 2,000 year history, was nicknamed “The Angel of the Apocalypse” because he believed the end of the world was very near. Protestantism led many saints to believe that they were living in the end times as heretical groups calling themselves “Christian” split off from the Catholic Church and each other. The chaos that ensued was maddening. The Freemasonic French Revolution brought so much bloodshed that many in that day believed the end was nigh. The 20th century saw Nazism, and then even worse, Communism massacre millions and millions of innocent people, causing uncountable bloodshed. The horrors of the past century were unlike anything seen before in all of human history.
ReplyDeleteThen we come to the last several decades. We have a council that directly taught heresy and ambiguity all throughout its 16 documents. Putative popes fully embraced this council and the confusion that it brought. It was like the Catholic Church was attacking itself (at least that’s how it seemed). Along with this has been the increase of the occult and Satanism, which is now prevalent everywhere in society.
This brings us to the many horrific sins of today. Abortion, contraception, euthanasia, homosexual “marriage”, and so many other dastardly sins are “the law of the land” in many countries around the world. Transgenderism, now a normal part of society, would have horrified ALL of the saints living in the previous centuries. If they all could have taken a time machine and been transported to this time now in which we live, they wouldn’t believe what they were seeing as they walked around the streets of the world and observed a world so alien compared to their respective times in which they all lived. They would all in unison probably utter “These are the end times in which Our Lord foretold would one day come!” It would be such a culture shock to them with how the world has spiraled lower and lower to absolute hell compared to their previous times in which they all lived, which were hellish enough for them. Many of them would probably be looking intently at cemeteries, thinking that at any moment the Earth will quake, tombstones will be knocked over, and all the dead will rise from their graves, while others would be intently looking up at the sky constantly thinking that any moment The Eternal Judge would be descending from the clouds in all His Power and Glory. It certainly seems like these times, long ago foretold, are the end times in which Our Lord spoke of and that the imminent end is not that far off.
-TradWarrior
TradWarrior
DeleteIt certainly does seem like it's nearing the end. Pray hard.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Don’t like the word victim, but it applies with children. Because they are innocent. Anecdotally, I was born into the very new Post V2 church. Sent to school at a brand new Jesuit school who brought sex education classes taught, in all likelihood, by gay Jesuits. At the same time the priest who formed me was gay (later sent away due to molestation allegations , but never charged) and post-mortum indicted in the sex abuse debacle in PA. He brought up sexual issues with me in private settings. I was generally a dorky, but innocent kid. I mentioned things to my parents, but they trusted priests at that time. Because our culture promotes sexuality, it took decades and a traditional SV priest to basically call it spiritual molestation. After a wretched life, my coping skills became so warped and disordered, I was able to managed in the “world”. V2 did not change to fit the world, it changed the world because, even those who weren’t Catholic used the (true) popes as a beacon for morality. Is it end times? I don’t know, but I do know that the true Catholic Church is minuscule compared to what people believe. By God’s grace, Bp Sandborn was so kind and charitable to me and the remnant of the Church exists.
ReplyDelete@11:49
DeleteMy friend, I'm so sorry for what happened to you. I'm glad to see you're doing better and that Bp. Sanborn was able to help you. The Vatican II sect is evil in all it does.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Introibo:
ReplyDelete1. Do you think that most traditionalist priests(other than Fr. M. E. Morrison), will tell you who ordained them?
2. Do you think that SSPV(where you attend) is good at welcoming people who are new to them?
@anon1:33
Delete1. Yes. Any Traditionalist priest who will not tell you that should be avoided completely; they have something to hide. Fr. DePauw would always answer that question when asked.
2. Yes. The SSPV (like most Traditionalist churches/chapels is not "warm and fuzzy," but their are many nice people who attend. There are also opportunities to socialize.
God Bless,
---Introibo
I thought the last Leo Watch with Bishop Sanborn was very good.Poor SSPX folk,where are you going.It's time they stopped fooling themselves and holf fast to the True Catholic position of sedevacantism.God bless you Introibo
ReplyDelete@anon2:16
DeleteThank you my friend! Yes, the SSPX is going to self-destruct if they don't change course.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Great writing as always.
ReplyDeleteAs far as the SSPX is concern,they are a sinking ship.In all the years I attended them,it was double speak and standards.They would always say the errors of Vatican Two,not heresies.I could write a list of other troubles.These are indeed frighting times.God bless
C.T
Brisbane,Australia
C.T.
DeleteI agree. They need to do mental gymnastics to try and maintain their position. They will self-destruct if they don't change and accept sedevacantism.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Does anyone know if Father Christopher Leith of the SSPX. Was he validly ordained. I know he was ordained in 1992.
ReplyDeleteThis former sspx group maintains a list on their website. They are still R&R and do not recognize Thuc line fyi.
Deletehttps://catholiccandle.neocities.org/#gsc.tab=0
RE Fr Leith they wrote:
Ordained in 1992 in Winona. Sources: Identified as a new deacon in the Summer 1991 Verbum.
Stated on 11-22-07 that he was ordained in Winona with Fr. Steven Stanich.
Thank you very much. I'm interested in WHO ordained him. Was it a valid bishop?
DeleteI understand. Perhaps email the priest or the site which generated list above. They must think he is valid as they call others on the list...so called Fr ........but I know they do not always update their list.
DeleteIntroibo,
ReplyDeleteI read this on a R&R blog. Can you shed some light on this outrageous statement?
"The pontificates of homosexual Popes Leo X and Julius III led millions of Catholics to leave the Church in the sixteenth century."
@anon6:03
Delete"Millions of Catholics" did not leave the Church in the 1500s over the alleged homosexuality of two popes. As to Pope Leo X, there is no substantial evidence. As one source puts it "There are suggestions – mainly on the basis of a 1525 comment by Guicciardini and a later anonymous pamphlet – that Leo had male lovers. (He makes the Routledge Who’s Who in Gay and Lesbian History.)" (See https://historymatters.sites.sheffield.ac.uk/blog-archive/2013/leo-x-the-unfortunate-pope-500-years-on).
Hence, on the basis of a single allegation and an anonymous pamphlet, Pope Leo X was supposedly a sodomite. He was hated for many reasons, by Catholic clergy and Protestants alike, for many reasons--homosexuality not being one of those reasons. Even most secular historians today admit there is no definitive evidence, and the pamphlet was written by his enemies to calumniate him.
As to Pope Julius III, the allegation comes from his relationship to Innocenzo Ciocchi del Monte, a scandalous and wretched young man to whom Julius gave great favors. There were rumors that they were lovers and Protestants helped the rumors fly. del Monte would later murder two men for insulting him and was accused of raping two women. Was the allegation of homosexuality true? Possibly, but the evidence is not incontrovertible. However, it did not cause a mass exodus from the Church. I'd like to see the writer's source for that allegation.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Thank you.
ReplyDeleteSurely Divine Law would prohibit a pope from being a sodomite, yes?
@anon10:20
DeleteUnfortunately, no. There is nothing that prevents a pope from committing any type of sin.
There have been morally depraved popes. The sin of heresy alone deposes the pope.
God Bless,
—-Introibo
Thank you.
DeleteIntroibo, was the Borgia pope Alexander VI as lecherous as is commonly held?
ReplyDeleteI understand that, theologically, he was wholly orthodox (as noted subsequently by the Freemasons) and that most of what we know of him personally comes via his rivals / enemies.
Was he as lecherous and corrupt, personally, as is typically understood?
I ask because I watched the tele-vision serial, featuring Jeremy Irons, which was, well, bawdy to say the very least.
Mr. Irons is married to a Catholic (NO presumably) and, of course, featured in the seminal production of Brideshead Revisited from the early 1980s. There is a very interesting interview with Evelyn Waugh, in which he discusses Roman Catholicism and why he converted to it, to be found on he link below:
https://youtu.be/UvtjUt0GzKg?si=UTii8zUWmWJXZWZ8
@anon3:57
DeleteYes, Pope Alexander VI was evil. This much is admitted by nearly all historians:
*he murdered at least one person
*he had several concubines
*he had many illegitimate children with them
*he made appointments based on nepotism
Bad pope. No getting around this one.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Thank you.
DeleteIt is noted in the above post that "Bergoglio (Francis) began the full promotion of perversion, and now Prevost (Leo XIV) continues his legacy." But even so, as perverse as they are, references to Bergoglio as being "Poop Francis" or to Prevost as being "Poop Leo" presumably will not be published here. Yet, is it possible that Introibo might find it OK to refer to the alleged body double impostor of Montini as being "Poop Paul" (?!?!). Surely one deserves to be called a "poop", or nincompoop, who never even received one vote in a conclave.
ReplyDelete@anon2:12
DeleteI don't buy into the body double theory. Hence, I refrain from "poop" appellations.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Introibo: .
ReplyDelete1. Do you think that the SSPV CLERGY are good at welcoming people that are new to them?
2. If somebody is attending SSPX out of "necessity", what should they say to the SSPX PRIEST who might have questions for the person?
@anon12:23
Delete1. Yes. Before receiving the sacraments, you must talk with a priest. I know almost all of them, and they are Christian gentlemen.
2. You should answer sincerely. You need not divulge you're a sede (mental reservation) unless directly asked. Hopefully, that priest would permit you to attend as long as you don't talk about it in church.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Introibo,
ReplyDeleteThroughout the years, you have written many articles against the Feeneyites and their errors. Many times, this dealt with defending Baptism of Blood and Baptism of Desire against a very strict Baptism of Water only teaching. This led me to thinking about several things and perhaps this could also be a future post that you could write on.
This morning, a thought crossed my mind: Have any theologians in the history of the church ever spoken about a Confirmation of Desire? Or to take it even further, a Confirmation of Blood? Sticking with the Desire topic, there are traditional Catholics all around the world that do not have access to true priests and true sacraments. There are many people who desire to have a traditional confirmation but they may never receive traditional confirmation for one reason or another due to their circumstances. Can one be Confirmed by Desire? I have never heard of this but this thought crossed my mind today.
Let’s take this further. Other than baptism, could another sacrament be received by desire? I don’t think someone could be Married by Desire or Ordained by Desire. What about the Sacrament of Penance by Desire? Or Last Rites by Desire for those who have no access to Extreme Unction? The Eucharist by Desire? For a sacrament to be valid, we know that there can be no impediment from 1 of 5 things (as you have mentioned several times in previous posts): 1) Form, 2) Matter, 3) Intention, 4) Administer 5) No Obex. If any 1 of these 5 (or more than 1 of these 5 are lacking), the sacrament is invalid.
Now, God acts through His Catholic Church and the sacraments are the ordinary manner of receiving channels of grace. But He could act outside the normal means, extraordinarily, if He so desired. For example, the Novus Ordo Eucharist is invalid. If a line of communicants came up to receive (what they wrongly believed to be) Our Lord in ‘Holy Communion’, if He desired 1 of the 50 people in the line to truly receive His Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity, then He could make the bread transubstantiate for the 1 person alone (for reasons known to Him alone, if He so chose). I am not saying that He does this but that He COULD do it if He chose since He is not bound by the sacraments, like His Church is bound by them. Out of the 20 people in the line of a Novus Ordo confession line, 2 of them could, for example, receive absolution by God if He so chose since the Novus Ordo clergyman is not a real priest. Or potentially maybe they all would be validly absolved by God since He knows they are truly contrite and they want the sacrament. The obstacle in this case to receiving absolution is nothing on the part of the penitent, rather, the obstacle is a man in the confessional who (sincerely) believes that he is a priest, though he is not.
CONTINUED…The sacraments are very mysterious because there could be something lacking that would invalidate it, though the person receiving the sacrament could have a defect that he or she is not aware of and goes on believing the sacrament is perfectly valid. This could be true of normal traditional sacraments by a Sedevacantist priest. For example, a penitent may fulfill every step to a proper confession to be absolved, but could be lacking in one thing. He could not have an intention of avoiding the sin again in the future. This would invalidate the sacrament. The priest administers the words of absolution, thinking the penitent is absolved, when in actuality, he is not. “Whose sins you shall retain, they are retained”, yet the priest would not be aware that the person did not receive absolution, only God would, and perhaps the penitent who does not fulfill the one prescription of receiving proper absolution: an avoidance of this sin (and all sins) in the future.
ReplyDeleteThere are many people in the world (most people probably) who believe that they have valid marriages, yet there is no doubt many have invalid marriages due to 1 of those 5 defects. They believe they are receiving a valid sacrament (the sacrament is the couple itself with the priest as the witness). In the minority of cases where there truly was a defect in a traditional marriage and an annulment would be warranted (in ordinary times if we had a pope), in this case, the couple, or rather the individual, is just stuck in what truly is “a marriage that never was.”
Many people believe they are receiving a valid Eucharist, yet if their SSPX priest was not validly ordained (unbeknownst to them), they are in fact receiving ordinary bread and wine, not Our Lord, again, unless He acts extraordinarily in granting an exception to the rule here and administering Himself in the sacrament, because the priest is invalid, though everyone believes he is valid.
It seems like internally, there may be no sure way of knowing if one is receiving a valid sacrament or not, at least in SOME situations, though not all.
Perhaps Our Lord is mystically administering many people around the world His sacraments extraordinarily in this Great Apostasy because with so few valid bishops and priests, He knows there is no other way people would have the means to properly receive them. I am not saying this is the case. I am just posing a theoretical possibility, and even if it was the case, how would we possibly know? We couldn’t.
-TradWarrior
TradWarrior
DeleteYes, theologians have taught that only the Sacraments necessary for salvation can be received by desire (common teaching). For those with the use of reason there are three: Baptism, Penance, and the Eucharist. An implicit intention suffices.
There is "Penance by desire"--an act of perfect contrition, which expresses sorrow for sin, a firm resolve never to mortally sin again, and TO GO TO CONFESSION as soon as possible should the occasion present itself.
There is "the Eucharist by desire"---an act of spiritual communion--highly recommended by numerous saints and popes.
The other four sacraments cannot be received by desire. You cannot be confirmed, anointed, married, or ordained by desire.
Can God produce a miracle such that He changes an invalidly consecrated host into His Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity? Possible, as I know of no reason He could not do that. The question is DOES He so operate. I answer in the negative. God gave us spiritual communion for this reason. Can God give grace to someone well disposed who believes he is receiving Holy Communion but it is not? Certainly. That could definitely happen.
The penitent who is not properly disposed does not get absolved, e.g., has no firm resolve to amend his life. The penitent has only himself to blame for that one.
What of one who confesses sincerely to an invalid priest? God could give him the grace to make a sincere act of perfect contrition to receive remission of sin.
Those living in invalid marriages, but believing them valid in all sincerity (e.g. a bogus "annulment" from a prior marriage), would be living in sin in the external forum, but no guilt would be imputed in the internal forum.
The fact remains we NEVER know with absolute (apodictic) certainty if ANY particular sacrament is valid. Even before V2, what if a priest was rushing through Mass and left out a necessary word of Consecration? Maybe even the priest himself was unaware. Nevertheless, no one would commit sin for missing Mass, and God can give the graces of spiritual communion.
All we have (apart from a special revelation from God) is MORAL certainty. That's good enough.
Your theory on God directly administering sacraments is an interesting one. Perhaps on a rare occasion, God does change an invalid host into the true Eucharist in a miracle for reasons known but to Him. As you correctly state "We couldn't" know for sure, outside a special revelation from God.
God Bless,
---Introibo