Governor Andrew Cuomo (b.1957) of New York State, is a pro-baby killing, pro-sodomite, adulterous apostate. Those are his good qualities.The egotistical bully is the son of notorious former NY Governor Mario Cuomo (1983-1995), infamous for his insistence that as a "Catholic" he was "personally opposed" to abortion, but he "wouldn't impose his views on others." He was also against the death penalty for reasons of conscience. When a reporter brought this internal inconsistency to his attention he responded that "capital punishment is taking a life, but abortion is giving you a choice."
The fact that pseudo-educated dolts like the Cuomo family can hold high positions in the government makes me fear for our future. Mario Cuomo was actually considered for an appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court by President Bill Clinton, and Andrew's name has been mentioned as a possible presidential candidate for the Democratic Party in 2020. Let it be known that the Vatican II sect, allowed both father and son to receive "communion." Andrew doesn't even pretend to have an "annulment" from his wife (he never even applied for one), yet he and his concubine are both given the Novus Bogus "mass" cracker.
Now, Mr. Cuomo has made one of his priorities the legalization of marijuana for recreational use in New York. As of this writing, ten states have legalized the use of so-called "recreational pot." The first states to do so were Colorado and Washington in 2012. They were followed by Alaska, California, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont, and the District of Columbia ("Washington DC"). We are told by advocates of legalized marijuana that it is no different from drinking alcohol, it's hard to enforce laws against pot, and legal marijuana will bring economic benefits. The purpose of this post is to give the Church's teaching on the use of so-called recreational drugs, and to demonstrate why the legalization of marijuana is so insidious; what the powers-that-be don't want you to know and why. This issue has serious theological implications which will be discussed below.
The Teaching of the Church
According to theologian Jone, "Since morphine, opium, chloroform and similar drugs can also deprive one of the use of his reason temporarily, that which was said of intoxicating drinks holds also for narcotics. To use narcotics in small quantities and only occasionally, is a venial sin if done without a sufficient reason. Any proportionately good reason justifies their use, e.g., to calm the nerves, dispel insomnia, etc. Such use becomes gravely sinful if it creates an habitual craving for 'dope' which is more difficult to overcome than dipsomania and more injurious to health. To use drugs in greater quantities so as to lose the use of one's reason is itself a mortal sin; but for a good reason it is permissible. Such a good reason is had in case of an operation, i.e., that the patient be rendered insensible to intense pain, or that one might remain calm under the knife. In like manner one may administer opiates to one who is suffering greatly in order to alleviate his pain." (See Moral Theology, Newman Press, [1961], pgs. 57-58; Emphasis mine).
Since narcotics are under the same general rule as alcohol, here's what moral theologian O'Connell has to say about the loss of reason: "It is not requisite...[to] be rendered utterly stupid and helpless...[rather] that one would do things inordinate which otherwise he would not do...The malice of drunkenness consists in the fact that, without a sufficient reason, a person in a violent way deprives himself of the use of the noblest of his faculties." (See Outlines of Moral Theology, CUA [1958], pg. 168; Emphasis mine).
As you keep in mind these principles of Church teaching, also consider that we know so much more about the effects of drugs today than when theologians O'Connell and Jone were writing in the late 1950s-early 1960s. Then came the Great Apostasy and the drug culture of the late 1960s. I can only imagine how Church teaching would have further developed on this issue in light of all we now understand. Marijuana, or cannabis, will have enormously deleterious effects upon the human brain, the family and society.
Cannabis and the Family
We now know that the legalization of recreational marijuana promotes the drug’s usage among the very young, where it causes the greatest harm. After recreational cannabis was legalized in Colorado, their youth’s past-month cannabis usage 2013-2014 "was 74 percent higher than the national average." According to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health:"Coloradoans of all age groups (12-17, 18-25, 26 and older) rank first in the nation for past-month marijuana use. Before legalization they ranked fourth, third and seventh, respectively."(See https://cdapress.com/archive/article-6dac5ea8-7beb-546e-84fd-83deb36340f7.html)
Think about that for a moment. Twelve year olds will have ready access to legalized cannabis. Since 2016, a mere four years after Colorado legalized it, cannabis became easy to obtain. With sophisticated ways to take it such as vaping, it makes it harder to detect. Vaping refers to the inhalation of an aerosol produced by heating a liquid/oil or substance in a compact electronic portable vaporizer. Youth can vaporize marijuana – either the ground plant itself, waxes often referred to as dabs, or THC and CBD oils. (THC is the drug in cannabis that produces the effect of getting high).
According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), cannabis use may have long-lasting or permanent effects on the developing adolescent brain. Negative effects include:
- Difficulty with critical thinking skills like attention, problem solving and memory
- Impaired reaction time and coordination, especially as it relates to driving
- Decline in school performance
- Increased risk of mental health issues including depression or anxiety and in some cases, psychosis where there is a family history of it
- Research also shows that about one in six teens who repeatedly use marijuana can become addicted, as compared to one in nine adults
How easy would it be for 18 year olds to supply young kids with cannabis and vaping paraphernalia? One out of every three Denver high school juniors and seniors surveyed identified as cannabis users; demonstrating a sharp increase of 20 percent from 2013 to 2015. (See https://www.idahostatejournal.com/opinion/columns/the-problem-with-pot/article_d9e0a8c1-41e4-5165-838f-6da2bcd0e6bb.html). According to former "Drug Czar" William J. Bennett, "We know we have a problem, and we have not managed to keep those things from kids. Colorado was supposed to eliminate the marijuana black market, but it did not." (See https://www.newsweek.com/problem-pot-306634).
Candi CdeBaca, an education and community activist who lives next to a commercial marijuana growing operation in Elyria-Swansea, CO., told Politico Magazine:
"One of the things that we thought was going to happen when [recreational] marijuana was legalized was that drugs would be taken out of our community. What happened was that the drugs stayed—and the drug dealers changed." (See https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/what-works-colorado-denver-marijuana-pot-industry-legalization-neighborhoods-dispensaries-negative-213906).
What we see here is the spirit of rebellion against authority. It's hard enough to raise kids in these perilous times without pressure (and the ability) to use a substance that will make them do poorly in school, open the doorway to other drugs, make them sin against God, and less likely to understand right from wrong (or the precepts of the Church) with the acquired impaired critical thinking skills.
Cannabis and Society
Several studies have also concluded that driving while intoxicated with both pot and alcohol is far worse than driving drunk. Since millions of people get high with both alcohol and marijuana, the synergistic effect of these two drugs will prove to be a dangerous devil’s brew for drivers. The Democratic governor of Colorado, John Hickenlooper, said that legalizing marijuana in Colorado was "reckless." In 2014, the left-wing rag, the Washington Post published an op-ed by pro-marijuana author Radley Balko headlined, "Since Marijuana Legalization, Highway Fatalities in Colorado Are at Near-Historic Lows."
In typical Communist propaganda style, the article leaves the reader with the impression that legalizing marijuana might have something to do with less traffic fatalities in Colorado. Balko admits that the fatality figures "don’t suggest that pot had anything to do with" the lower numbers, but then says that if fatalities were going up, "supporters [of making pot illegal again] would be blaming it on legal marijuana." According to one author, "Colorado traffic fatalities have gone down since 2007, but they went up in 2012. More to the point, Colorado traffic fatalities between 2007 and 2012 involving operators testing positive for marijuana use increased 100 percent over that period—from 39 in 2007 up to 78 in 2012." (See https://www.dailysignal.com/2014/11/30/why-legalizing-pot-is-a-bad-idea/).
According to The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), 2006-2013; CDOT, 2014, cannabis-related emergency room visits increased from 8,197 in 2011 to 18,255 in 2014 and the percentage of Colorado vehicle operators who were found positive for marijuana increased from 7.88 percent in 2006 to 24.03 percent in 2014. Furthermore, we are promoting other drug usage, as cannabis is a "gateway drug."
According to a peer-reviewed study: "Exposing adolescent rats to THC (the active ingredient in marijuana) can lead to molecular and behavioral alterations in the next generation of offspring, even though progeny were not directly exposed to the drug. Male offspring showed stronger motivation to self-administer heroin during their adulthood. Damage in the glutamate pathway, which regulates synaptic plasticity, has been linked to disturbances in goal-directed behavior and habit formation." (See Henrietta Szutorisz, PhD, et al., Neurophychopharmacology, January 2014---https://www.nature.com/articles/npp2013352).
Society will become more drugged-out, leading to fatalities, and fostering addicts to stronger drugs, thereby driving up the crime rate.
Cannabis and the Human Brain
Drug expert Dr. CC. Nuckols stated, "The marijuana we have today is so much more potent, we’re seeing a new range of psychiatric problems and psychotic episodes. It’s really a new game." (See https://www.oxfordtreatment.com/blog/the-problem-with-pot/) The Oxford Treatment Center goes on to state, "At double-digit percentages, the standard THC content in marijuana today many times what it was in the 1960s." This results in lower IQs and an inability to function in society.
According to Drs. Ruby Grewal and Tony P. George, "Reports have shown a staggering increase in cannabis-related emergency department (ED) visits in recent years. In 2011, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) estimated a total of 1.25 million illicit-drug–related ED visits across the US, of which 455,668 were marijuana related. A similar report published in 2015 by the Washington Poison Center Toxic Trends Report showed a dramatic increase in cannabis-related ED visits. In states with recent legalization of recreational cannabis, similar trends were seen.
States with medicinal marijuana have also shown a dramatic rise in cannabis-related ED visits. Moreover, states where marijuana is still illegal also showed increases. This widespread increase is postulated to be in part due to the easy accessibility of the drug, which contributes to over-intoxication and subsequent symptoms. Overall, from 2005 to 2011, there has been a dramatic rise in cannabis-related ED visits among all age groups and genders." (Emphasis mine).
Cannabis and the End Times?
Drugs, cannabis being no exception, put people into an altered state of consciousness. Those of you who read my ongoing series of posts called "Singing For Satan," (based on my research on rock, pop, and rap music) know that almost all of the musicians were drug users, and most claimed contact/inspiration from "spirits"--Eminem, The Eagles, etc. They used drugs and entered into an altered state of consciousness which makes one susceptible (like hypnosis) to demonic forces. So-called "shamans" (pagan "witch-doctors") take drugs for this very reason; it enables them to make "contact with the spirits."
In the Apocalypse 22:15, we read, "Outside are the dogs and the sorcerers and the immoral persons and the murderers and the idolaters, and everyone who loves and practices lying." According to theologian Haydock, "the dogs" refer to unbelievers (See The New Testament of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ with a Comprehensive Catholic Commentary, reprint from 1859, pg. 1656), and "sorcerers" comes from the Greek word pharmakeia from which we get the word "pharmacy." The word does not only mean the sorcery that comes from idolatry, but can also refer to the use or administration of drugs. We see that pagans often used drugs to call on their "gods" (demons), so it's not surprising that Holy Scripture seems to link the two.
Aldous Huxley (d. 1963), the famous author of Brave New World, and philosopher, was known to experiment with LSD and mescaline. He was deeply involved in the occult. On his deathbed, he asked his wife to shoot him up with LSD so he could "trip" into the afterlife. She complied, and I cannot imagine what horrors he found that never end, unless he somehow repented by a miracle of grace. In a speech he delivered to a California medical school, two years before his death, he made the following chilling prediction:
"There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution." (Emphasis mine).
In the Apocalypse 22:15, we read, "Outside are the dogs and the sorcerers and the immoral persons and the murderers and the idolaters, and everyone who loves and practices lying." According to theologian Haydock, "the dogs" refer to unbelievers (See The New Testament of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ with a Comprehensive Catholic Commentary, reprint from 1859, pg. 1656), and "sorcerers" comes from the Greek word pharmakeia from which we get the word "pharmacy." The word does not only mean the sorcery that comes from idolatry, but can also refer to the use or administration of drugs. We see that pagans often used drugs to call on their "gods" (demons), so it's not surprising that Holy Scripture seems to link the two.
Aldous Huxley (d. 1963), the famous author of Brave New World, and philosopher, was known to experiment with LSD and mescaline. He was deeply involved in the occult. On his deathbed, he asked his wife to shoot him up with LSD so he could "trip" into the afterlife. She complied, and I cannot imagine what horrors he found that never end, unless he somehow repented by a miracle of grace. In a speech he delivered to a California medical school, two years before his death, he made the following chilling prediction:
"There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution." (Emphasis mine).
Conclusion
Recreational marijuana, or cannabis, is yet another step towards the final breakdown of Christian civilization as it once was on Earth. The forces of evil are peddling it, and people are going for it. According to The Pew Research Center, as of October 2018, 62% of Americans support legalized cannabis. (See http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/10/08/americans-support-marijuana-legalization/)
The facts show that it will damage families, and the upbringing of children. It will have harmful effects upon society, with more deaths from auto accidents and people having psychotic episodes--even as it induces people to take more dangerous drugs. It causes such psychotic episodes even in adults and lowers IQs, making one more gullible (and therefore more dependent upon) the government. Finally, it opens users up to demonic influences. A One World Church and a One World Government. Could legalized cannabis be taking us there faster? It seems so. Time will tell.
I have never known anyone who was addicted to Pot to ever give it up. It seems that there is something more insidious behind the addiction than just a physical craving.
ReplyDeleteJoAnn
Joann,
DeleteNor have I ever known anyone who gave up smoking pot without medical help. There’s more going on than some cravings.
God Bless,
—-Introibo
I gave it up with prayer, penance, the true sacraments, and a special grace from God through Mary. In my experience, it maximizes sensory pleasure. I had given myself over to all the evils of the flesh so it was the drug of choice. It leads to the grossest sins of impurity for both sexes. If the life of the senses is it as the modern world preaches, then It makes perfect sense for worldlings to become a slave to it. Without God, it is logical to give yourself over to vice and wickedness. I thank Mother Mary and Our Lord for the true freedom give. Me.
ReplyDelete@anon9:41
DeleteWhat a beautiful and powerful testimony to the power of Christ and His Mother! You pinpoint the problem of Cannabis and how it enslaved people. Congratulations on your freedom in Christ and Mary! You’re in my prayers!
God Bless,
—-Introibo
I was a heavy user of pot as a youth and adult until into my . It eventually led me to hard drugs. I don't know about long term effects, but it helped ruin a marriage and just made me self centered. It made me very strange socially, and paranoid. I could have been doing more productive things.
ReplyDeleteBut I don't think it effected my thinking long term. I am a Sede after all! But maybe I could have been even smarter!
I think you ought to do something on smart phones and texting and stuff like that! Keep it up!
Thank you for the testimony my friend, and congratulations on getting right with God! I will be doing a post on the dangers of technology in 2019!
DeleteGod Bless,
—-Introibo
Pot is absolutely fine to use. In fact it cures cancer when used correctly. Well, the government version is suspect but real pot has fantastic medicinal properties. Do your own research. See anything to do with Rick Simpson: http://phoenixtears.ca/
ReplyDeleteI have done my research, and the claim that cannabis "cures" cancer is unsupported in the medical literature. I lost both parents to cancer and took care of them when they were dying. I have (unfortunately) a long history of dealing with cancer patients.
Deletet can be argued that THC has been effective as an Cannabis proponents claim it is an antiemetic in dealing with nausea from chemotherapy or intraocular pressure associated with glaucoma. However, studies have shown that one who takes THC for glaucoma must be “high” 24/7 to derive relief from the drug. Other studies have shown that up to 81 percent of those who took TCH for nausea reported negative side effects. (See Sallan SE, et al, “Antiemetics in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer: a randomized comparison of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and prochlorperazine.” N. Engl. J. Med., January 17, 1980, 302(3):135-138. National Center for Biotechnology Information: PubMed)
Thank God we have far more effective antiemetic drugs that utilize Serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists that do not come with the psychoactive effects of THC, and no one dealing with nausea or glaucoma needs to resort to marijauna for relief.
Mr. Simpson is not a doctor or medical researcher. I'm sure there are people who will swear his oil saved them. There are no medical studies to support their claims, or to show if it was a cause and effect of the oil. Many people have claimed "secret cures" for cancer, yet all have proven scams.
---Introibo
And Happy New Year to you as well. I’m glad you know exactly how this world works. (You and Mr. Simpson, of course). Big pharmaceutical companies are in it for money for sure, but can you imagine the money they would make off a genuine cure? There will always be something else to plague us.
DeleteDo you remember laetrile ? It was also promoted as a cure for cancer that gave people false hope and has been conclusively proven ineffective against cancer.
You also claim pot is fine, while the manifest weight of the credibile evidence shows otherwise. At the risk of sounding uncharitable, you’re a prime example of how marijuana damages the brain and impairs thinking.
—-Introibo
Hey, sorry for jumping on you man. I'm just passionate about helping people. My wife and I take Laetrile (B17) every day. Neither of us have had cancer yet and we are approaching 50. Not bad in this day and age. Happy New year to you too.
Delete1: Many say drugs should be legalized so we can avoid drug dealing. But then, who is going to punish the drug dealers?. Because they are going to hide everything they did before the legalization, and it would be very very suspicious that the first thing someone did after that "freedom triumph" was opening a pot store.
Delete2: Many say we should legalize drugs in order to avoid drug overdose, moonshine production and to help stoners. Now the question may be who is going to do this "control".
3: Don´t want to sound negative, but seems to me that the drug dealer-stoner trouble is not going to be solved. We did not control the problem since it started - now it is sadly too late. However it´s just my opinion.
4: If you are a lower-class or middle-class stoner, you go to jail. But if you are a rock´n´roller who just wants to be stoned and sings about it, they will dedicate you a movie, a song, an a concert when you overdose with any substance.
5: Even if pot worked with cancer that does not mean it may cure you from secondary effects.
For Greater Glory of God,
Long Life Christ the KIng and Our Lady of Guadalupe.
@poni
DeleteGood points!
God Bless,
—-Introibo
When a woman that depraved gives up pot, you can imagine the bad effects it must have!
ReplyDeleteGod Bless,
—-Introibo
Introibo --- I guess some people need things spelled out for them.
ReplyDeleteBut isn't it a case that most Catholics with a properly formed conscience would realize that taking mind altering substances "just for fun" is sinful? And then knowing that it's sinful, wouldn't curiosity compel them to find out just how sinful under varying circumstances?
Just saying...
@anon9:12
DeleteA properly formed conscience is about as rare as a True Mass these days. The Vatican II sect does not form proper consciences. Not to mention the ravages Of Modernism. Bergoglio grew up in the True Church. Do you you think HE has a properly formed conscience? Where is the outrage from “Cardinal” Dolan of NYC?
If the V2 clergy think it’s no big deal, then most of their followers will feel the same. As for Traditionalists, I write to inform my readers about the dangers that face us and the facts to “Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect,” (1Peter 3:15)
God Bless,
—-Introibo
“Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect,” (1Peter 3:15)
ReplyDeleteI understand. So, treat people/retaliate like you treated/retaliated against anon @ 8:08 pm?
@anon10:42
DeleteMany people have a false idea of “gentleness and respect.” The Modernists would have us believe Christ was the ultimate wimp. That “turn the other cheek” and “love thy enemy” is an open invitation to be a walking mat whom people can abuse.
Let me say that I try to be fair to everyone who comments here—even those with whom I disagree. I don’t mind engaging in civil discourse with anyone. However, that anonymous commenter attacks my intelligence and tells my readers there is nothing wrong with marijuana. That is defending evil. What did Christ say of those who defend evil?
“O generation of vipers, how can you speak good things, whereas you are evil? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.” (St Matthew 12:24).
Notice he calls them a “brood of vipers”—very strong language for the time. Christ also used a whip and cleansed the Temple in righteous anger:
“And making a whip of cords, he drove them all out of the temple, with the sheep and oxen. And he poured out the coins of the money-changers and overturned their tables. And he told those who sold the pigeons, "Take these things away; do not make my Father's house a house of trade." (St John 2:13-16).
Given the circumstances, I believe I was gentle in rebuking him. To be gentle and respectful does not entail allowing people to mistreat you and defend evil; harsh words at times can wake people up. As he came back to apologize it had its intended effect. I forgive him and pray for him—with true gentleness and respect.
God Bless,
—-Introibo
Introibo --- Thanks, you made some good points, and in context I don't disagree with those points. However, everything you claim you achieved could have been done without being sarcastic and insulting. No offense, but you seem like a bit of a reactive "counter puncher" whose first instinct is to put people in their place via sarcasm and insults. I've seen you do this numerous times. However, I do accept that it's entirely your business how you wish to come across to others. But I'll just point out that it's actually a mark of manliness to turn the other cheek, while nonetheless correcting people in a kind but firm manner. Nothing "wimpy" about that method. Nothing that involves letting evils slide using that method. And, finally, this is not a den of vipers; rather, it's a little blog mostly read by Catholics whom are sedevaxantists. No need for excessively harsh words here, although I will applaud you when you use some well warranted words to attempt to snap R&R devotees back to reality. But one size doesn't fit all. That's the thing to keep in mind.
ReplyDeleteWell put , and noted for the record! Consider me fraternally corrected! I will try to come across better as you suggest.
DeleteGod Bless,
—-Introibo
It was not Introibo's fault. I jumped all over him and called him an idiot. I would react the same way. One of the dangers with being able to write anonymously is that we can behave badly and not worry about consequences to our own character. Again, sorry Intro and everybody here.
Delete@anon8:20
DeleteApology accepted. We are all imperfect. I often tell people the reason I follow Christ is not because I’m so good, but because I’m so bad and don’t want to get worse. I want to strive to be good even as Our Lord exemplified what we should be like.
Happy New Year and God Bless you my friend!
—-Introibo
I'll add what St. Phillip Neri used to say "Lord keep Thy hand over Phillip, or Phillip will betray Thee."
DeleteAnonymous @ 8:20 am
ReplyDeleteYou are solely responsible for your words and actions, and "Introibo" is solely responsible for his. That needs to be clearly understood and accepted.
Did you provoke him by your aggressive posting? You most assuredly did! But
your provocation
was one act, and Introibo's response was another. Separate and distinct acts but nonetheless linked. If blame were to be apportioned, who's more to blame? Why you, of course, sir! You (advertently or inadvertently) provoked his response.
I'm glad you apologized. It's fitting and just and speaks well of you.
Why did I bother to address this situation with Introibo?
Because - and please don't take this the wrong way - he is the "bigger man" in this by default. This is his blog and as such he *is the example* of how one should conduct themselves here. I'm sure he doesn't want to encourage a situation where he ends up receiving numerous unprintable comments each week.
I've already acknowledged that there is a place, at times, in debate for ad hominem. introibo has used it to good effect at times when responding to the illogical ravings of pestiferous R&R sectarians whom invade his blog every now and then.
It was pretty obvious to me that you were harmless - just a bit steamed up, not malicious.
Honestly, I was just trying to help Introibo. I cringed a bit on his behalf when I read the insult near the end of his first post to you. And don't get me wrong - Introibo is probably a saint compared to me.
Introibo has a nice, informative blog. The last thing he needs is people saying things like, "He writes some good articles, but he let's himself down by engaging in juvenile squabbles in the comments section." And if anyone thinks people don't gossip they're deluded.
A happy and blessed new year to you, Introibo and readership!
@anon11:27
DeleteHappy New Year to your family and you, my friend!
God Bless,
—-Introibo
Don’t know why all the criticisms. Introibo does an excellent job.
ReplyDeleteThank you my friend!
DeleteGod Bless,
—-Introibo
Introibo --
ReplyDeleteI have been reading your blog for several months, but this article was so good that I am compelled to thank you. I used to be a regular slave of the modern world. I was an atheist who dabbled in New Age witticisms about "consciousness", I was a pot-head, I was addicted to impure vices, the whole nine yards. On the outside, I kept up the "cool" facade. But on the inside, I was disgusted with myself. I was enslaved to nihilistic despair, bad habits.... I lost the respect of many of my peers, my girlfriend (which might have been a blessing, in hindsight?) and I lost a lot of my motivation in life.
Over the past two years, I have been unplugging from the modern world and doing research to its ills. I eventually became a traditional Catholic. However, I did not know marijuana use was inherently sinful; I thought it was in the same species of inebriant as alcohol. This was the last vestige of false belief from years of pro-drug, pro-sex programming from public schools. When I found out several months ago I was still indulging in sin, I vowed to give marijuana up COMPLETELY. I haven't touched it since, and with God's grace I can persist in sobriety.
So this is a very timely article for me. The traditional Catholic teaching is that reason is God's greatest gift to man, so we should guard it carefully and not attack it with inebriation to "take the edge off life." You hit all the major points regarding increased drug dependency, impaired driving, usage that comes with widening availability, etc. And you hit a home run with that Huxley quote. I am convinced Huxley was no prophet -- he was cluing us into the plot!
You have a great blog, and it's clear that you put in a lot of time and research to producing well-reasoned and well-argued articles. Thank you for your work: please keep it up!
God bless.
I’m humbled by your words and so happy for your conversion! Your comment made my day! Your testimony and those of others is proof that God is reaching people through my posts. It keeps me writing. All glory be to God!
DeleteGod Bless,
—-Introibo
Introibo,
ReplyDeleteA special thank you in this New Year for all you do!! You do a wonderful job and this blog is much appreciated!!
JoAnn
Thank you Joann! Your comments keep me writing! I thank you and all my readers who let me know they profit from what is written.
DeleteGod Bless,
—-Introibo
Your post reminded me of a Cathinfo topic where folks were discussing the use o pot and for my surprise a lot of them were regular users.
ReplyDeleteCath(dis)info. That's the site owned by the "Bp. Williamson Resistance" stooge and SSPX seminary dropout, Matthew. Matthew used to support (maybe he still does?), via his toleration, an unabashed pothead who went by the name of "Roscoe." It was insane - Roscoe was left completely unchecked to constantly spruik the beauty and wonders of pot smoking. It wouldn't surprise me if Matthew was a "midnight toker," too. The site (Cathinfo) has a value equal to about 1% of this site (Introibo Ad Altare De), if that!
DeleteCathinfo seems to be quite disreputable.
Delete—-Introibo
To Anonymous January 2, 1:41 pm: You have received great graces from God. Thank you for sharing your inspiring story!
ReplyDeleteHaving also been deeply involved in the pot lifestyle in my past I have a couple of comments based on personal experience.
ReplyDelete1. Pot is addictive in a much sneakier way than something dramatic like heroin or cocaine. People think it's no big deal because it just makes them more laid back, more relaxed. Thus, we have a culture full of people who are literally "slouching towards Gomorrah" because, "Hey, it's all good, dude. No worries, man. You do what you want and I'll do what I want." They don't worry about the sinful lifestyles of others as long as they're free to get stoned.
They aren't going to overdose on it and be forced to go to rehab and turn their lives around, like with harder drugs. It's just a pot. No big deal. So people use it and become lazier and lazier and farther away from God. I remember in college my gal-pals complaining about how their pot-smoking boyfriends did nothing but smoke pot, sleep, and watch TV. Now that's a winning lifestyle!
2. It keeps men from growing up. (See 1.) I don't know how many full-grown adult men I know who are STILL smoking pot, and of course, they are divorced with "girlfriends," living the lives of teenagers. It is absolutely pathetic to see men in their 40s, 50s and older who live to get high. They feel absolutely no guilt about it. They even brag about getting high. And now there are no limitations since it's being legalized everywhere! They are so immature and irresponsible, and their teenage children are following in their footsteps.
3. You open yourself up to the Satanic side with pot. You really do. I have had "bad trips" just with pot. Some strains are stronger than others and I have had experiences of feeling like evil forces were "messing with my mind."
4. And NOBODY out there is talking about the influence it has on kids. Do they really want their children getting high? Kids are hearing that marijuana is a wonderful thing that should be legalized. How do you think that is going to play out? Nobody seems bothered by the thought of seeing their children high on pot!!
On a side note, I used to listen to several "health" podcasts but I have given them up due to the fact that they talk so much about how great marijuana is for your health. There are, in fact, many natural cures for disease. (Yes, even cancer.) However, there are no medical benefits from pot that you can't get from some other safe sources. (BTW FYI -- Red palm oil, frankincense essential oil, and black salve are all known to be cancer fighting. I have used the first two on sun-damaged skin lesions on myself, and have seen those lesions disappear. I don't know much about the black salve, but I read some very interesting info on it.)
Anyway, I am really disgusted by how many seemingly sane, healthy people are promoting the legalization of pot these days. It was only a few years ago that all self-respecting politicians, journalists etc. would distance themselves from the issue because it was an embarrassment. Not only can you see people becoming stunted in their maturation process, but actually reverting to a mindset lacking in wisdom and maturity. It really is an indication of how low our culture has fallen.
La gallina,
DeleteThank you for yet another powerful testimony this week! God is so merciful to so many of us! Congratulations on your conversion and thank you for commenting!
God Bless,
—-Introibo
La gallina, you are the second ex-stoner appearing in the comments section who's exceptionally articulate. Would you say that you managed to escape the marijuana trap with no permanent cognitive impairment?
ReplyDeleteWishing you all the very best for the new year!
I'm not sure if my sometimes less than crystal clear mental state is due to the years of marijuana and other mind-altering drugs, or the "baby brain fog" from bearing seven wonderful children;)
DeleteI do know that it is only by God's grace that I am not worse off mentally than I could be. And by HIs grace that I finally listened to His gentle knocking on the door of my heart, and was blessed with a wonderful family and the Catholic Faith despite my years of rebellion!
La gallina @ 9:00 pm
DeleteI thank you for sharing this important story. Truly inspirational! You are amazing!
Deo gratias!
It is well known that Hassan ibn Sabbah, the Old Man of the Mountain, leader of the sect of the Ishmaelite of Alamut in the eleventh century, drugged his murderous minions with hashish, and this made them obedient fanatics of him.
ReplyDeleteStop giving me ideas, Junior. :O
ReplyDeleteNo offense but I disagree with this article.
ReplyDeleteBig Pharma wants people addicted to Pharmaceuticals as where marijuana has natural healing properties & and doesn't cause people to become addicted and go into severe opiate withdrawal.
I knew someone who had cancer and the Cannabis helped her with nausea various pains appetite etc...
However the Pharmaceuticals she was prescribed destroyed her life and others around her.
-Andrew
Andrew,
DeleteThe facts above (and the teaching of the Church) is strictly against recreational cannabis. See my response below to medicinal use. Did you not read the testimonies here of the good people who were slaves to cannabis before God freed them?
God Bless,
---Introibo
Hello Andrew,
ReplyDeleteI'm curious as to your point of disagreement with the main post. The correct Church teaching has been presented relating to the proscription of drugs for recreational purposes. Introibo's main thrust was the danger to society presented by the legalisation of marijuana for recreational purposes. It goes without saying that opiates when incorrectly used carry the same proscription. They are also as equally dangerous in all other respects.
I know that cannabis for the treatment of some types of epilepsy is being investigated by the medical industry. Cannabis, that is, containing virtually no THC. The treatment for epilepsy and other disorders using marijuana goes back to ancient times. I don't think that Introibo would say that the use of cannabis/marijuana on patients under strict medical supervision for purely medical reasons is necessarily immoral.
But only Introibo can confirm or deny
the truth
of my assumption.
@anon9:21
DeleteYou're assumption is correct. If--as you clearly stated--the cannabis contains virtually no THC, and is used under very strict medical supervision, it would not be sinful.
However, as I pointed out in an earlier comment, "we have far more effective antiemetic drugs that utilize Serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists that do not come with the psychoactive effects of THC, and no one dealing with nausea or glaucoma needs to resort to marijuauna for relief."
I don't believe that medicinal cannabis is necessary in almost all cases. If, however, there is such a need as you describe, and no alternative can be used, it would NOT be sinful to use cannabis according to the teaching of the Church.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Introibo - Paper which you and your readership may be interested in.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767492/
Thank you for the information!
Delete—-Introibo
Introibo: I'm very strict in my views about drugs. For example, my instinct tells me that N2O ("laughing gas") should be avoided when visiting the dentist. What do you think about the legitimacy/illegitimacy of nitreous oxide in dental treatment where other totally non-controversial pain control methods are clearly available?
ReplyDeleteI think that other methods should be employed and laughing gas is no laughing matter. Dentists are using it less themselves as even a small leak in the office can have effects—such as headaches, and they’re doing research on whether it can render someone sterile!
DeleteGod Bless,
—-Introibo
Yes, Introibo, agreed - it's no laughing matter! After reading this, you won't even be tempted to chuckle at catastrophe. haha
ReplyDeletehttps://adf.org.au/drug-facts/nitrous-oxide/
So tomorrow is the continuation of the singing for Satan series. I'm gonna take a shot in the dark and say the artist will be Bon Jovi. I don't know them very well but I'm sure their song living on a prayer is anti-capitalist.
ReplyDeleteYou’re certainly correct that Mr. Bonjiovi is not a good guy. However, the subject of tomorrow’s post will probably surprise most of my readers! In the conclusion section of the post, I’m asking readers to comment on whether they want the series to continue or not—and the reason. My “Singing For Satan” posts only get about half as many viewers as my other posts. I’m wondering if that’s for a lack of interest. I don’t mind going through my notes from the 1990s and updating/ posting the research—but it is a lot of work, and if I’m to continue, I must feel that it’s beneficial to people. I hope you will comment there tomorrow!
DeleteGod Bless,
—-Introibo
Cannabis is a plant, which means it was created by God. Because it was created by God it cannot be intrinsically evil. God created everything for a purpose which means that our use of cannabis cannot be evil so long as we use it towards its proper ends.
ReplyDeleteRyan,
DeleteNo argument there. Recreational use of cannabis is wrong and sinful.
---Introibo
I would judge Cannabis by the same standard which we judge alcohol where the loss of reason is what makes it sinful.
DeleteI don't think there is anything wrong with substituting a joint for a beer if your object is to engage in deserved leisure.
I think the problem with cannabis is that it is so easy to get carried away since the immediate physical consequences are so minute and for that reason I think it should be generally avoided.
Ryan,
DeleteWhat you say is generally true, but as you can see from the evidence above cannabis is BY FAR worse than alcohol, and works towards the destruction of society. When recreational marijuana users have babies, I’m afraid of the results in the long term!
God help us.
—-Introibo