As I am writing these words, we
are on the eve of the last full week of Advent. Our minds and bodies have
started to grow weary with penance while the post-Christian or rather
anti-Christian world around us has been indulging in a full-blown celebration
of the “holiday season” for weeks now. Stacks of Christmas decorations lay
disorderly in our stores, having been thoroughly searched through by countless
customers already, though the most frantic shopping days are probably yet to
come. Ember Friday has been substituted by the so-called Black Friday where you
go on an online hunt in pursuit of the best bargain. It certainly takes a lot
of perseverance for Catholics today not to get swayed by the worldly idea that
the “magic” of Christmastime lies in going on shopping sprees and humming “Christmas”
tunes along the way.
As the bulk of Christmas
preparations rest with the wife and mother, or the woman in general, it seems
to me that it is also the ladies
who must decide whether Christmas is celebrated in our homes according to the
wishes of Our Lord and of His One True Church – and act accordingly. We simply owe it to Our Lord and with this
post I would like to share with you some of the reasons that could inspire that
gratitude towards God in us this coming Christmas.
There has been much talk of the so-called female liberation in the past decades. The Vatican II sect has been in the process of feminizing their false religion for years now and Bergoglio has certainly pushed things ahead when he officially allowed women to act as lectors and acolytes with his Motu (Ina)Proprio Spiritus Domini issued January 11, 2021. Obviously, the practice of having “altar girls” goofing around the table and female “Eucharistic ministers” has already been well-established in the Novus Ordo. All of this is naturally abominable to anyone who still retains even the remnants of Catholic sense, and does not mistake equality for equity.
One of the most prominent figures of the Novus Ordo who failed to grasp that distinction in terms was John Paul II. In his Letter to Women, issued in relation to the Fourth World Conference on Women, sponsored by the United Nations, and held in Beijing in 1995, having first expressed his deep appreciation to the UN for the organization of this “very significant event,” he states that “as far as personal rights [of women] are concerned, there is an urgent need to achieve real equality [emphasis in the original text] in every area," adding that this is “a matter of justice."
(See: https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/letters/1995/documents/hf_jp-ii_let_29061995_women.html)
Just to give you a short overview
of what that very significant event heartily
endorsed by the then chief apostate in the Vatican aimed to accomplish, here’s
an excerpt taken from one of the UN-run websites:
The 1995 Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing
marked a significant turning point for the global agenda for gender equality.
The Beijing Declaration and the Platform for Action, adopted unanimously by 189
countries, is an agenda for women’s empowerment and considered the key global
policy document on gender equality.
A section of that declaration
says the following with regards to the “Human Rights of Women”:
Try squaring that with the true
Magisterium of the Church expressed in the encyclical on marriage, divorce, and
birth control “Casti Connubii” by Pope Pius XI (which, at the time of its
release in 1931, was re-printed in full by… the New York Times! Times
certainly have changed…).
As we are (hopefully) preparing
ourselves spiritually for the joyous and thankful celebration of the Nativity
of Our Lord, let us first consider the state of the world before the first
coming of Christ, and – in particular – the position of the woman in the
pre-Christian society.
Arguing that the restoration of
the world through Christianity proves its divine origin, Fr. Stanislaw
Bartynowski S.J. in his textbook on Catholic apologetics (1939 Imprimatur)
gives an apt description of the world and society before Christ:
Errors with regards to the most basic philosophical
and moral issues were dominant everywhere, except for the people of Israel.
Only the Israelites worshipped the true God – all of the other nations
venerated nature and prostrated before stones and trees, made by their own hands.
The entire earth was a vast temple of idols, in which, according to Bossuet’s
words: all was God, except for God Himself. Even the most civilized and
mentally-developed nations were no less backward in terms of religion than the
savage ones. People lost their sense of morality to such an extent that they
would adore iniquity in public: each passion and every kind of cruelty had its
guardian deity that was venerated by the practice of the corresponding
iniquity; thus, pagan temples became places of utmost scandal. Whereas, real
virtue, such as charity was regarded as a vice by Seneca or Plautus; honest
labor was the object of scorn – according to Aristotle and Plato, an occupation
unbecoming of a man since “everyone who has respect for himself” should lead an
idle life, as Terence wrote.
As a result of such a revolution in concepts and
degeneration of morals, the holiest of man’s affections disappeared – justice
and honesty were unheard of and the dignity of man trampled upon. Thus,
contempt for human nature was formed. For instance, the father as the master of
life and death in his family, could either acknowledge a child as his own or
reject it, nay, even kill it with impunity. Seneca regarded this as a just
thing to do and, according to Quintilian, the killing of one’s own child was supposed
to be a beautiful deed!... [Quintilian was
a Roman educator or pedagogue, living in 35-100 A.D. – so much for the rights
of children in pagan Rome] Woman was
deprived of her honor and regarded as something lower than man. Thus, the wife
was the first among her husband’s female slaves, whom he could dispose of at
any moment. The family was abused amidst such relations, and the hearth and
home shattered by polygamy.
The society became such as were its members: criminal
and unhappy. The lust for living it up and the egoism of the mighty caused
abject poverty of the poorer classes, which was conducive to all kinds of crime.
Major part of the population found themselves in the most pitiful conditions of
all, being deprived of their civil rights, nay, even, their human rights… Those
were the unfortunate slaves, used for the hardest labor, treated like animals
by their masters to be sold or killed on a whim. They could at any time be thrust
into the amphitheater to be devoured by lions and tigers… such spectacles would take a heavy toll of
about thirty thousand victims each year!
Liberty in the state was known only by its name, the
citizen had no freedom – he was regarded as nothing in the face of the
god-state, that could at any moment demand the sacrifice of the citizen’s
property, liberty, and life. State orders, though inhumane, were thought to be
good and just. The tyranny of the mighty was a substitute for all law – as a
consequence, all respect for authority vanished, and those in power could never
be sure whether they would live or not… In a word, the law of the fist was the
only norm of conduct.
Generally speaking: overabundance and the violation of
all that is law at the top, with debasement and slavery of the lowest classes –
such is the image of the pagan society before the coming of Christ.
In particular, people were so much accustomed to the
corruption and bloody lawlessness which would outrage any honest man today,
that neither the lawgivers, nor the philosophers and poets cared at all to
raise the world from this moral abyss.
How different is this description
of the world immersed in sin and blinded by paganism from the alleged glorious
image of ancient civilizations peddled by the media today.
Such was the miserable state of
humanity more than 2,000 years ago. Without becoming overly apocalyptic, we can
safely assume that the modern world bears a striking resemblance to the one in
which the Incarnate Word was to be made flesh and born of the Blessed Virgin
Mary in the cold stable of Bethlehem. The general falling away from the
Catholic Faith in the aftermath of Vatican II has led many to adopt the pagan
ideas of old – if not in theory, then certainly in deed. Nature abhors a
vacuum, and human nature is no exception to that rule. Most people who consider
themselves educated and intelligent sincerely believe that it is imperative
that we stop burning fossil fuels so as to “save the planet” but shrug their
shoulders at the thought of innocent babies being murdered in their mothers’
wombs at an unprecedented rate.
If human dignity as such was utterly
destroyed in the pre-Christian era, the position of the woman was particularly
pitiful. Fr. Jozef Stanislaw Adamski thus outlines the lot of the weaker sex in
the pagan world in his book The Dignity
and Mission of the Christian Woman (1922):
The originally beautiful and noble creature of God –
the woman – was basically devastated. God has, since the dawn of time, clearly
defined the position and the mission of women. He provided the first couple in
Paradise with mutual unity and love. The woman was no stranger to the man, much
less was she lower than him or insignificant. (…) Therefore, the very means of
creating her should inspire in her husband the love for her, should make him sacrifice
himself for her, and respect her. God set His goal for the woman clearly: she
was to be the man’s helper, being similar to him, having the same nature and
value as he has – the alike helper (adjutorium simile). God demanded of him
limitless sacrifice for her: “wherefore a man shall leave father and mother,
and shall cleave to his wife” (Gen. 2: 24). Such was the original work of God:
kind, gentle, harmonious, fertile, and powerful.
However, man destroyed this wondrous work, and put his
own monstrosity in its place. In the place of union and love, he introduced
tyranny – the woman was supposed to cater to his base lust like a slave. Having
humiliated the woman, man started to despise her; deprived her of the due
honor, denied the position assigned to her by God, devised laws against her –
wicked and cruel ones – which deprived the woman of the dignity of a human
being which left her to fall prey to all kinds of injustice. The man, instead
of putting his own strength and the energy of his sacrifice at the service of
her weakness, took advantage of her feebleness in order to subjugate her
completely and destroy her. God called her the mother of the living, gave her
the right to bear and educate her children, but the man took away even this
most crucial right from her! In the most enlightened Rome in the full bloom of
civilization under the emperor Augustus only the free women were defended from
violence by the law – [a man] was free to do with his female slaves whatever
he pleased. The woman was denied her civic laws; she was held in custody her
entire life. As a daughter, she was her father’s possession who could kill her
or sell her and offer her hand in marriage without her consent. The woman was
underage her entire life – from her father’s slavery she was passed under the
hand (sub manum) of her husband as his daughter (filiae loco), for her husband
to regard her as an object. According to the Lex Voconia [the Roman law of
inheritance passed in 169 B.C.], she was
denied her father’s inheritance even if she was a single child. In relation to
her husband, the woman was a servant, a slave, allocated to the lowest works.
The role of the slave was so eagerly accepted by the disgraced woman that,
after having served her entire life, she would commit suicide on her husband’s
grave as it was the case in India or among the Gaul tribes, not because she
wanted to be happy in the life to come (paganism did not regard women as being
worthy of happiness), not because she wished to accompany her husband – but in
order to serve him still in the afterlife!
Not very different was the fate of the woman among the
Slavonic peoples, in Poland. In order to understand the sad lot of the woman,
suffice to say that polygamy was a common practice. Once introduced into the
house and handed over under the authority of her husband, the woman awaited a
most painful fate. Only yesterday [that
is, before she was married] was she so
respected that if any man should come into contact with her, it was regarded as
her being defiled. She was believed to be a creature so pure and exalted that she
would be called a diva, a kind of a goddess who could at any moment take the
honorific place of a priestess and a seer in the pagan temple of ancient Slavs
– now she is called names such as the one who does not know, cast into the
cabin of the savage master of her life and death. The husband, dissatisfied with
a daughter being born, would (many times before the mother’s eyes) grab an ax
and kill the baby – woe to the mother if she dared weep or complain! (…) Such
is the fate [of the woman] today in
places where the rays of the Gospel have not reached yet or the warmth of which
cannot be felt any longer.
Indeed, the paragraphs quoted
above express to some degree the present condition of the woman in today’s
world which had known Christ and His One True Church yet rejected Him, and fell
once again into the pits of sin. Isn’t the so-called “liberated” woman a slave
to her own wicked passions when she is willing to walk the streets with lewd
banners in support of her “right” to kill her own unborn baby? Isn’t she
complacent with her own enslavement when, working all week as a clerk in the
supermarket, grumbles at the prospect of having a free Sunday due to the state
legislation on restricting public commerce on that day?
Let us now consider, Fr. Adamski continues, how Our Savior raises the woman up from her debasement and ennobles
her. (…) Christ Our Lord elevates the woman in Holy maternity. Oh, how
wondrous, how lovely is the scene that begins the work of our redemption! The
angel – sent to the woman - descends from heaven; he comes to arrange with her
the greatest work of God destined to regenerate and save the human race. He
solemnly declares that she is full of grace; at her feet homage is paid; heaven
and earth awaits her consent for the work in which she is to play the most
crucial part. What an amazing and most marvelous turn of events this is! What
glory; what a wonderful restoration of the woman! At once, the woman who
groaned under the weight of most shameful slavery, stands at the unparalleled
heights, at the highest throne of heaven right next to God-Man. “The queen stood on thy right hand, in gilded clothing; surrounded with
variety” (Ps. 44:10).
Our Savior raises the woman up illuminating her with
innocence and grace. The Virgin Mother, the Mother of God inaugurated the
liberation and elevation of the woman with unsurpassed charm and light. Still,
in order to lift the woman up something more was needed since the long ages of
pain and ruin had deprived her of the freshness of her original innocence and
the strength of her native virtue. Lo! At Christ’s feet there kneels a woman,
representing the degradation of the female, shedding profuse tears of
contrition at the feet of God-Man, Who, before the spectators’ eyes, restores
her good name, and, to some degree, illuminates her with the original
innocence. Jesus not only says to her: “thy sins are forgiven thee” but also
praises her fervent faith, extols her magnanimous charity, and the service of
her boundless sacrifice. The purified and sanctified woman is led by the Holy
Savior to the heights of heroism. During the horrifying passion of Christ, when
His flock was scattered, when men – the Apostles, except for St. John – desert
Jesus, the woman takes their place at Calvary, fearlessly facing the rage of
the murderers of God and gathers in a way the last drops of His Blood!
(…)
Our Savior dignifies the woman with the honors of the
hearth and home. Those rays of God in which Christ clothed the woman who became
His spouse in the religious life, are shining also beyond the cloister, and are
spread throughout the entire world. From that time on the mother of the family has
occupied a prominent and wide place in the home, guaranteed her by the
Christian right of sacramental marriage. The woman is a spouse inseparably
joined with her husband. Here does she reign – and if the Apostle reminds her
of her duty to be obedient to her husband (Col 3:18), then it is the obedience
full of glory which does not violate any of her rights. Now, she is the one who
educates her children who acknowledge in her the most tender and sacred authority
and prestige.
Our Savior consecrates and dedicates the woman to
great works in the society. (…) From the early centuries of Christianity, where
events of great importance have been taking place, there have been found a
Christian woman. Constantine is aided by [his mother] Helena;
Theodosius had [his daughter] Eudoxia and [sister] Pulcheria; Clotilde [a Catholic princess who remained Catholic
despite the Arianism of her court] converts
Clovis [the first king of the Franks whose baptism in 496 unified the
Frankish tribes; he is regarded by the French as the founder of France]; Blanche transforms her son into St. Louis;
Doubravka [a Bohemian princess] brings
the light of the Faith into Poland [with her husband, Mieszko I, being
baptized in 966 thus consolidating the once-pagan tribes and giving rise to the
first independent and Christian Polish state, the Duchy of Poland], and Hedwig [or Jadwiga of Poland, the
first woman to be crowned as monarch of the Kingdom of Poland in 1384] brings the Faith into Lithuania. On the throne as well as on the lowest steps
of the social ladder, the woman, lifted up by Christ, becomes a heroic
creature, eager for the highest sacrifice, a fearless aide, whether she is
called “the good duchess” Elizabeth of Hungary or Genevieve, the humble
Parisian shepherdess, or the Maid of Orleans, Joan, sent by God to free France
(…). Fr. Ventura rightly states that “popes,
apostolic men, founders of religious congregations, saintly priests and lay
people, even kings who were not saints, would have accomplished nothing sacred,
great, beautiful, useful in the interest of the faith or morals, nay, even the
material prosperity of peoples without the cooperation in this or that way of a
Catholic woman: if that woman – for her part - was thoroughly Catholic and – apart
from her lofty virtues - she would have a profound and extensive knowledge of
religion; if she would shine with impeccability”. (…)
May the women craving for unhealthy emancipation
remember just what they owe to Christianity, without which the slavery and
shame of old awaits them!...
Conclusion
Although people like Karol Wojtyla may have envisaged that the great process of women’s liberation (…) is still unfinished, true Catholics surely know better than that. Ladies, we’ve already been liberated! Let us give thanks this Christmas to the One who truly liberated us, male and female alike, having broken the chains of our pagan captivity, snatching us with His own Precious Blood from the shadow of death, and having illumined the entire world with the light of the True Catholic Faith which we must preserve and spread according to our abilities in these trying times of near universal apostasy. May our gratitude to Jesus Christ, our greatest Heavenly Benefactor be ever renewed in our hearts, especially as we kneel in our churches, our chapels, and our homes before the crib of Our Redeemer in the midst of the world which “knew him not.” Merry Christmas!
Thanks Joanna for another great writing.All the best for 2023.God bless and our Lady watch over you.Steven
ReplyDeleteThank you, Steven!
ReplyDeleteMay God bless You ad Yours abundantly in 2023,
Joanna S.
Hello Introibo or Joanna or Lee:
ReplyDelete1. Do you know if the SSPV in upstate New York is okay? I think that a lot of the storm is in Buffalo, but the SSPV I believe does have locations and people outside of Long Island.
2. I understand that some traditionalists(Bishop Sanborn, Bishop Dolan(deceased), and Father Cekada(deceased)) thought that it was fine for Terri Schiavo to be taken off of her feeding tube(this was in the mid-2000s). Others, SSPV, possibly CMRI, were of the opinion that her feeding tube should have been kept in.
Do you know if these groups still have the same opinions today, and does it affect who they will give sacraments to?
Thank you. Anonymous
@anon3:30
Delete1. The SSPV is fine anywhere you go.
2. The SSPV and CMRI hold the correct opinion and still do. I don't know about Bp. Sanborn. I don't remember him taking a position, but I could be wrong. It is not an "issue" with the SSPV or CMRI, unless you declare openly that ORDINARY means to preserve life should not be maintained. That is pro-euthanasia and a priest would be right to withhold Communion from a public sinner causing scandal.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Hello Introibo:
ReplyDelete1. I meant to ask about the big storm in Buffalo. Are the SSPV members in upstate New York okay in the storm?
2. I know about the positions of SSPV on the Terri Schiavo case. If somebody AGREES with the SSPV position on the case, what should that person do about approaching a different group for the sacraments? Not ask about the Schiavo case? If the group has the wrong position on the Schiavo case, should that group be avoided for the sacraments? Thank you. Anonymous
@anon8:09
Delete1. I have not heard of anything bad (Deo gratias!). However, I'm not privy to everything that goes on. I'm in NYC.
2. You will never be asked about Terri Schiavo, so it's a moot point. The problem lies, not really in the Catholic principles, but how they were applied. Hence, you need not avoid anyone. Only if (God forbid) a priest or bishop said that ordinary means need not be given to someone serious ill or dying would they be condoning murder. I would then avoid them just as if they said abortion is acceptable.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Hello Introibo and Joanna from Brisbane,Australia.
ReplyDeleteAll the best for 2023.Keep up the fine writings.
Bishop Sanborn is sending down another priest to help with our growing missions here and over in New Zealand.We hope to in the near future to have some of the sisters of Saint Thomas Aquinas start a school here.God bless you
@anon4:14
DeleteWonderful news! Praying that 2023 will be a great year for you all!
God Bless,
---Introibo
Hello I have a question for introibo or anyone else. If a baptized Catholic marries a non baptized person with approval from the novus ordo bishop, would that be considered valid even though he is not a Catholic bishop? What is your opinion? Thank you.
ReplyDeletePatrick,
DeleteIn my opinion, a "Catholic" (I'm assuming V2 sect) marries a non-V2 sect member, it would be valid as they are not bound to the canonical form and the approval of the "bishop" makes no difference. That's my opinion, nothing more.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Okay thank you sir
DeleteGood post Joanna ! The modern world is polluted by feminism and its errors like the "right to abortion", contraception, gender equality. And the V2 sect, like the Great Prostitute of the Apocalypse, fornicates with the powers of this world and approves of its false doctrines. We have to thank God for opening our eyes to this false church that came out from hell !
ReplyDeleteHappy New Year 2023, Introibo and all readers !
Simon,
DeleteYes, Joanna has written another fantastic post!
Happy New Year, my friend!
God Bless,
---Introibo
Thank you, Simon and Introibo!
DeleteThe Vatican II sect is on its path for even more feminism and heresy in 2023. Deo Gratias indeed we're no longer part of it!
God Bless You,
Joanna S.
Joanna, there will probably be women priests and bishops in the V2 sect, as there is in Anglicans. This is the logical consequence of the false doctrine of gender equality, as we see in civil society.
DeleteI agee with you, Simon. Novus Ordo women ordination is probably just a matter of time. People are so accustomed to seeing females taking the lead in Novus Ordo parishes that the only logical step for that false religion is to have women preside at the novus bogus table, and have it legalized in their false magisterium. I hope at least some fence-sitting people will flee the V2 sect then!
DeleteGod Bless,
Joanna S.
Joanna,
ReplyDeleteWonderful, enlightening post! Thank you. God bless you.
-Seeking Truth
Seeking Truth,
Deletethank you so much, my friend!
God Bless You,
Joanna S.
Introibo
ReplyDeleteI have a question for you please.
Which pre-vatican two books on moral,pastoral,dogmatic,mystical and ascetical theology do you recommend?
A recent convert to the Traditional Faith(was Anglican) who is looking at building up a good library.I have thrown in the garbage all my Novus Ordo books.
Thank you and God bless
Anthony
Anthony,
DeleteBooks I recommend for someone starting out:
Moral Theology: Theologian Jone "Moral Theology"
Dogmatic Theology: Theologian Ott "Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma"
Pastoral Theology: Theologian Schulze "Manual of Pastoral Theology"
Mystical Theology: Theologian Tanquerey "The Spiritual Life"
God Bless,
---Introibo
Thank you Introibo
DeleteI have those books.Can you suggest anymore.
What carmelite writings do you suggest?
God bless
Anthony
Anthony,
DeleteFor more advanced study
Dogmatic theology: Theologian Van Noort (3 vol), theologian Pohle (12 vol)
Moral Theology: Theologian Prummer (1 vol), theologian Slater (2 vol)
Pastoral Theology: Theologian Davis (4 vol)
Mystical Theology: theologian Garrigou Lagrange "Three Ages of the Interior Life" (2 vol).
Carmelite writings: Anything by St. John of the Cross
God Bless,
---Introibo
A blessed and grace-filled new year to you introibo my friend and to all readers.I made the comment last week about how I was misled by a woman at work.Thank you for praying for me.Thanks be to God she has resigned(we think she has been told to go for being a toxic manager)More info about her has been told to me.A child from her previous marriage she has just sent back to India with her brother so it can be brought up by the grandparents.She now has the time to play around with her new boyfriend.What mom would do that to their own child.I have not had much experence with dating so you can imagine how hurt I am.This is so typical of Novus Ordo women.As I said she had a rosary hanging in her automobile and a small crucifix next to her computer.Even at Traditional chapels I find many young women outside so worldly.To try and find a decent woman to date and marry is like finding a needle in a hay barn.It has been a wake up call.
ReplyDeleteGod bless
Dave
Dave,
DeleteBe glad you're out. The pain will ease with time, don't rush into anything. Everything happens in God's time, not ours. It is hard to find decent marriage partners these days (it's not just the ladies who are worldly). Nevertheless, I refused to settle and married in my 40s. My wife was well worth the wait!!
Continuing to pray for you.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Don't you think that is sick introibo a woman getting her parents to bring up her only child so she can play around with another man in ease.What evil times we are in.Don't despair Dave.God will bring someone decent in his time.Also praying for you.
ReplyDeleteThomas
Europe
Joanna S.,
ReplyDeleteThis is a very important blog post. Unfortunately I have met many nice and kind women in my life who have turned out to be leftist materialists, hedonists and practical atheists. Of course, young men in Poland are no better, although statistically at least declaratively they are more conservative and right-wing - which does not mean Catholic....
In this battle for "women's rights" in 2020, it has become clear who is who. I, unfortunately, also found out who my friends from school are.... Discussions with them were pointless. There were no reasoned arguments, purely emotional shouting and name-calling. All these brawls are the dialogue that the left demands? Where is their tolerance? Where is their pluralism? Where is their subjectivism and relativism? It has suddenly disappeared. There is the "one true" dogma of the left: "Abortion is good if the woman so wishes". All those who disagree deserve anathema and thunders of condemnation. As Bishop Sanborn once put it: 'No one is more dogmatic, more condemning, more intolerant than a leftist. The leftists make the Inquisition look like an ecumenical service'.
I have a question for you: according to you, every time a Catholic truth is attacked in company, am I obliged to stand up for it even if I have the moral certainty that it will amount to nothing? How do you do?
What do you think of the book 'One Hundred Years of Modernism. Sources of the Second Vatican Council" by Fr. Dominique Bourmaud SSPX? Recently Fr. Szymon Bańka SSPX on his famous youtube channel recommended it.
May the Saints Three Kings pray for you!
God Bless,
Paweł
Paweł,
DeleteI'm very sorry for the long delay in replying to your question.
I've recently come across a short article in one of the mainstream newspapers in Poland which said that nearly 70% of Polish women did not want to have children AT ALL, I believe it was some sort of a public opinion poll. Words fail me.
Regarding your first question, here's what theologian Connell writes ("Outlines of moral theology", 1953) on the subject of the profession of Faith:
"As an affirmative precept the obligation to profess the true faith binds a person (by God's law) as often as silence or ambiguity or his manner of acting would suggest an implicit denial of the faith, contempt of religion, an insult to God or scandal to one's neighbor. Thus, if a Catholic is present at a gathering in which the Catholic religion is being derided, he should ordinarily profess his faith and make some manner of protest. However, a person is not ALWAYS [emphasis in the original] bound to profess his faith, since there are times when silence, or even an ambiguous manner of acting would not involve any of the consequences just enumerated. In fact, at times a Catholic could perform an action which IN ITSELF [emphasis in the original] is lawful, even though forbidden by Church law, with the realization that others will thus conclude that he is not a Catholic. For example, in time of persecution a Catholic could eat meat on Friday if otherwise he might be the object of suspicion. Again, a young person who enters the Church without the knowledge of his parents could stay away from Mass on Sundays when it would lead them to judge that he had become a Catholic and to punish him severely in consequence. It should be noted, however, that to abstain from professing the faith is not the same as denying the faith or professing a false religion, for such things are intrinsically evil. Thus, the young person in question would never be allowed to take active part in a false religion, however grave the inconveniences might be that the parents would inflict. Ordinarily ambiguities are to be avoided, and a Catholic must be willing to declare himself such. This is particularly true of a public personage. It is well to remember, however, that our American law does not require a statement of one's religious affiliation as a qualification for office - e.g., schoolteacher. hence, if a person applying for such a job were asked his religion, he could refuse to answer."
Now, our situation today is different with regards to declaring oneself a Catholic inasmuch as the "Catholic" label has been hijacked by the false Novus Ordo religion, so I believe it is wise to declare oneself a traditional Catholic, a Traditionalist (as Introibo does), or make it clear in some way that one does not belong to the post-Vatican II religion.
cont.
DeleteI've been working for two weeks now in a place where I'm surrounded by many "modern" women, who take the Lord's name in vain, dress like hobos, are emotionally unstable, leftists, feminists, vegans, and the like. Not all of them, for sure. To make matters worse, I've been so engrossed in my new duties that I didn't realize I had been cheated by the all-women HR department.
Personally, I'm willing to talk to anyone who's of good will and asks for advice or opinion but when I see a hardcore leftist, I don't waste my energy on trying to reason with him (or her). If we go by the teaching of pre-Vatican II approved theologians, such as Fr. Connell's, we'll be fine.
Regarding your second question:
I'd stay away from anything published by the SSPX clergy. There's so many great, pre-Vatican II books with all the necessary Church approbations, and so much stuff is being published by good sedevacantist clergy. I don't trust the SSPX clergy at all, especially after my brief exchange of e-mails with one of their priests in Poland, where he declared that they have their own theologians (sic!). The SSPX today are a bunch of hypocrites, dressed in old vestments, and many of them mere laymen (invalidly ordained Novus Ordo presbyters, which is true esp. in our own country).
God Bless You,
Joanna S.