(See catholicfamilypodcast.podbean.com/e/waldorf-schools-and-occultism).
(See also introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2018/06/an-education-in-evil.html).
I was a middle school science teacher here in New York City prior to becoming a lawyer. However, my research into Waldorf Schools was recent and not from my studies in education. Both as an undergraduate and graduate student, my classes centered on traditional public school education. Only a brief and shallow overview was given regarding Waldorf and Montessori methods of learning, and we were never tested on it. I therefore took at face value what my professors claimed as true of these alternate methods of imparting knowledge.
One of my readers suggested that if I looked deeper into Montessori Schools, I would find disturbing truths there as well. Dr. Maria Tecla Artemisia Montessori (1870-1952) was born in Italy, and became the first Italian woman to earn a medical degree from the University of Rome. As a doctor, Montessori became involved in the treatment of children with disabilities and devised a special method of treating and educating them. Her method soon proved suitable for more general application and became known as the Montessori Method. I was a bit skeptical that I would find something wrong, as Dr. Montessori had always been presented as a devout Catholic and she wrote a book explaining the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass to children.
Nevertheless, I've come to expect the unexpected, and when I dug beneath the surface, Maria Montessori proved to be deceptive, and her pedagogy is rife with problems. This post will deal with Montessori and the educational system that bears her name.
What is Montessori Education?
According to one Montessori website, the conventional method is explained thus:
Montessori is a scientifically based education approach that emphasizes independence, freedom within limits, and respect for a child’s natural psychological, physical, and social development. It was developed by Italian physician and educator Maria Montessori.
Montessori education is based on the belief that all children are unique individuals, that they all have immense potential, that they want to learn and be busy. Therefore the teacher needs to guide each child through the learning process by using materials that fit their specific needs and pace.
A Montessori education is based on the seven principles:
FREE CHOICE
Learning and well-being are improved when children have a sense of control over their lives. Although Montessori programs impose definite limits on this freedom, children are free to make many more decisions than are children in traditional classrooms: what to work on, how long to work on it, with whom to work on it, and so on.
ORDER
Recent research in psychology has proven that order in the environment is indeed very helpful to learning and development. Montessori classrooms are very organized, both physically (in terms of lay-out) and conceptually (in terms of how the use of materials progresses).
INTEREST
Your gut feeling is right: Research has shown that when people learn with the goal of doing well on a test, their learning is superficial and quickly forgotten. Children (and yes, adults, too) learn better when they are interested in what they are learning.
LEARNING FROM PEERS
Children in Montessori classrooms learn by imitation models, through peer tutoring, and in collaboration. In mixed age classes, younger children learn from older ones by asking them questions while watching them work. Older children who are teaching younger children repeat and consolidate their knowledge and skills and obtain social skills.
MOVEMENT
Our brains evolved in a world in which we move and do, not a world in which we sit at desks. Movement and cognition are closely entwined. Education, therefore, would involve movement to enhance learning.
CONTEXT
Rather than learning largely from what teachers and texts say to them, children in Montessori programs learn largely by doing. Because they are doing things, rather than merely hearing and writing, their learning is situated in the context of actions and objects. For example, children go out of the classroom and into the world to research their interests.
TEACHER GUIDANCE
Montessori teachers provide clear limits but set children free within these boundaries. They sensitively respond to children’s needs while maintaining high expectations. This kind of ‘authoritative parenting’ seeks a middle ground between a traditional, authoritarian attitude (“Do it because we say so”) and an overly permissive, child-centered approach of other progressive schools.
(See montessorimallorca.org/montessori-seven-principles).
This is what is commonly sold to parents. However, there is no proof that Montessori education is in any way superior to traditional methods. In Nature, a peer-reviewed article entitled Montessori education: a review of the evidence base [2017] by Chloe Marshall, had this to say:
There are few peer-reviewed evaluations of Montessori education, and the majority have been carried out in the USA. Some have evaluated children’s outcomes while those children were in Montessori settings, and others have evaluated Montessori-educated children after a period of subsequent conventional schooling. As a whole this body of research suffers from several methodological limitations. (See nature.com/articles/s41539-017-0012-7; Emphasis mine).
So there is no definitive evidence that Montessori Schools will better educate children. Some religious parents send their children to such a school because if Dr. Montessori developed the methods, they must be based on Catholic principles. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Maria Montessori: Modernist and Occultist
Maria Montessori was raised in a devout Catholic home. She received a papal blessing from Pope Benedict XV (r. 1914-1922) and published The Mass Explained to Children in 1933. In accordance with Italian law, her first schools taught the One True Faith (Catholicism was the State religion). These are the parts of her life that get touted, and the appearance of a "good Catholic" served her well. What she really believed and did tell another story.
Montessori joined Theosophy, the occult sect of Madame Helena Blavatsky, founded in 1875. Theosophy, among other tenets, teaches that knowledge of God may be achieved through spiritual ecstasy, or direct intuition, known as vital immanence, a teaching of Modernism. Theosophy also teaches reincarnation and incorporates many pagan Hindu ideas. According to Joy Dixon, Divine Feminine: Theosophy and Feminism in England, [2001], pgs. 3-4, Theosophy has as its goal "to form a nucleus of the Universal Brotherhood of Humanity without distinction of race, creed, sex, caste or color." (Emphasis mine).
According to The Theosophical Society in America:
MARIA MONTESSORI had her first acquaintance with Theosophy, early in the twentieth century, when she went to hear Annie Besant speak in London in 1907 after Montessori had established her first Casa dei Bambini (i.e., Children's House). Annie Besant spoke in praise of Montessori's work in education which pleased Montessori, and thus sealed their friendship...
My own acquaintance with Montessori began through the Theosophical Society and reading her writings. In 1940, when I was seven years old, my family moved to a farm northeast of Ann Arbor, Michigan. My father's dream was to make it a Theosophical community and, for a while, it was. In 1956 my former sister-in-law, Barbara Bailey, and I started the first Montessori school in Michigan. In 1970, I took the Montessori Elementary training course for teachers in Bergamo, Italy and while there learned that some of the Montessori Elementary educational materials had been designed while Montessori was in India. (Hindu/Theosophy influence; See theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/42-publications/quest-magazine/1409-montessori-and-the-theosophical-society; Emphasis mine).
Following her death in 1952, the [Theosophical] Society President, C. Jinarajadasa, reported that Maria Montessori did in fact join the Theosophical Society on May 23, 1899. Her original application had been found by the Recording Secretary's Office at Adyar. There being no Italian Section the time, Montessori joined the European Section and was admitted by the General Secretary, Mr Otway Cuffe. Her membership was later dropped...
It is now clear, however, that Montessori's connection with Theosophy was older than the Method. The Dottoressa [i.e., female medical doctor] thus may have been influenced by early Theosophical literature on education. Indeed, in 1889 one of the Society's founders, the Russian mystic Madame Blavatsky, seemed almost to prophesy the future Montessori Children's Houses in the slums of Rome: I quite agree that there is a great advantage to a small child bred in the slums, having the gutter for playground, and living amid continued coarseness of gesture and word, in being placed daily in a bright, clean school-room hung with pictures, and often gay with flowers. There it is taught to be clean, gentle, orderly; there it learns to sing and play; has toys that awaken its intelligence; learns to use its fingers deftly; is spoken to with a smile instead of a frown; is gently rebuked or coaxed instead of cursed. All this humanizes the children, arouses their brains, and renders them susceptible, to intellectual and moral influences.
It is unlikely that the fiercely independent Dottoressa would have enabled Theosophists to claim her as their own by admitting that she had once been a member of their Society, or that she had been inspired by the writings of Madame Blavatsky. Montessori had also returned to Catholicism and Theosophy, with its belief in Karma and reincarnation, 'has been categorized "as being at heart Hindu" and hence antithetical to Catholic orthodoxy'. Indeed Jinarajadasa presumed that Montessori failed to acknowledge the efforts of the Theosophical Society in furthering her work, particularly in India, 'because she was a Roman Catholic, and to have mentioned the work of 'The Theosophical Society', would have drawn upon her the wrath of the Catholic hierarchy'.
(See kelpin.nl/fred/download/montessori/english/theosophist.pdf; History of Education Society Bulletin (1985) Vol. 36 pp 52 -54 "Montessori was a Theosophist;" Emphasis mine).
During the reign of Pope St. Pius X (1903-1914), many theologians suspect of Modernism held Montessori in high esteem. She was a leading proponent of feminism, and denigrated marriage and motherhood. In an article entitled Dr. Maria Montessori, Feminist, the doctor is quoted as saying:
...the woman of the future will have equal rights as well as equal duties…Family life as we know it may change, but it is absurd to think the feminism will destroy maternal feelings. The new woman will marry and have children out of choice, not because matrimony and maternity are imposed on her.(See thenewinquiry.com/blog/dr-maria-montessori-feminist).
The idea that marriage and family are "imposed" by society, and is not a vocation from God, can only be described as repugnant. The 1917 Code of Canon Law, Canon 1013, section 1 states: "The primary end of marriage is the procreation and education of children. Its secondary end is mutual help and the allaying of concupiscence." It's easier to understand her position when you know she conceived a son with a fellow doctor via fornication. They agreed not to marry, and Montessori put her son Mario into foster care to continue her career. Later, he would work with her when he was an adult.
Montessori spent time in India, and let her occultism show full force. In an age without computers and easy communication, Montessori felt safe in the pagan country. (I have seen pictures of her sporting the Hindu "bindi"—-a red dot in the middle of the forehead that symbolizes the pagan/occult "third eye"). She wrote for the Theosophy Journal in India, and became convinced of Indifferentism (i.e., one religion is as good as another as they all contain some truth--Vatican II anyone?).
Montessori stated: Just as language has many expressions: English, Swedish, Swahili, and so forth, so does elevation express itself by way of different creeds: Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism and many different belief systems in order to communicate with and about God.
(See lifesongmontessori.com/montessori-philosophy.html).
Also, she believed in the Modernist doctrine of vital immanence: We must remember that religion is a universal sentiment which is inside everybody and has been inside every person since the beginning of the world. It is not something which we must give to the child. (See The Child, Society and the World: Unpublished Speeches and Writings by Montessori; Emphasis mine).
Vital immanence is a doctrine of the Modernists forcefully condemned by Pope St. Pius X:
However, this Agnosticism is only the negative part of the system of the Modernist: the positive side of it consists in what they call vital immanence. This is how they advance from one to the other. Religion, whether natural or supernatural, must, like every other fact, admit of some explanation. But when Natural theology has been destroyed, the road to revelation closed through the rejection of the arguments of credibility, and all external revelation absolutely denied, it is clear that this explanation will be sought in vain outside man himself. It must, therefore, be looked for in man; and since religion is a form of life, the explanation must certainly be found in the life of man. Hence the principle of religious immanence is formulated. Moreover, the first actuation, so to say, of every vital phenomenon, and religion, as has been said, belongs to this category, is due to a certain necessity or impulsion; but it has its origin, speaking more particularly of life, in a movement of the heart, which movement is called a sentiment. Therefore, since God is the object of religion, we must conclude that faith, which is the basis and the foundation of all religion, consists in a sentiment which originates from a need of the divine. This need of the divine, which is experienced only in special and favorable circumstances, cannot, of itself, appertain to the domain of consciousness; it is at first latent within the consciousness, or, to borrow a term from modern philosophy, in the subconsciousness, where also its roots lies hidden and undetected. (See Pascendi Dominici Gregis, para. #7; Emphasis mine).
Montessori's Indifferentism is Inherent in the Curriculum
Once Catholic countries were destroyed by Vatican II, Montessori Schools wasted no time implementing their founder's poison:
As you would expect of an Italian woman at the turn of the twentieth century, Dr. Montessori grew up in the Catholic faith and its influence can be clearly observed throughout her life: threaded throughout all of her work are the unshakeable beliefs in the sanctity of the human spirit, the fraternity of all humankind, and the pursuit of peace as the noblest effort we must undertake.
Already during her studies and especially after the success of her early work, Dr. Montessori began to travel extensively. During her lifetime she met with leaders in all areas of human accomplishments: scientists, artists, political and religious leaders, and those encounters and relationships deeply influenced her work and thinking. It is unclear how exactly Dr. Montessori’s religious beliefs continued to develop as she kept this part of her life private, but there is evidence she came to a principal dissent with the Catholic church, and also that she had meaningful ties to non-European religions and even esoteric philosophies, particularly through the Theosophic Society.
Ultimately though, as they say, the proof is in the pudding, and the legacy Dr. Montessori left us is one of profound humanism. Now, as a century ago, her work encourages and empowers children and adults alike to celebrate, develop and uphold our shared humanity.
In Montessori theory, spirituality is listed as of the the five fundamental human tendencies: alongside and interconnected with the other four (work, exploration, group behavior and the mathematical mind) it is understood as one of the universal drives shaping our shared human experience. The four chief aspects of Spirituality, usually given as Art, Music, Dance and Religion (including its secular, atheist or humanistic manifestations), are considered as present and innate to every human culture throughout the history of our existence. Dr. Montessori thus explicitly named religious and spiritual life as something that connects us rather than divides us.
Most Montessori schools choose to present religion as a part of our cultural curriculum, both in the set materials and resources present in the classroom, and through actively involving the student body. As we encourage children from different language, ethnic or national backgrounds to study, share and celebrate each others heritage, so do we invite them to share their faiths, if they wish to: students are invited to bring photographs, artifacts, special clothing or stories and songs to the classrooms and learn to share their unique identity with pride.
Some schools (especially international schools with a diverse student body) organize cultural fairs when students act as ambassadors of their nations and cultures and teach attendees about them, including their faith backgrounds. Festivals and events are held as a way to honor and explore each other’s heritage. The same school might thus have special activities to celebrate Diwali, Mawlid, Hanukkah, Christmas and Chinese New Year in quick succession, allowing its students to experience wonder and beauty in each. (See montessoriparenting.org/montessori-and-religion: Emphasis mine).
Conclusion
Dr. Maria Montessori was a Modernist and occultist posing as a Catholic. Her teaching methodology is based on the false ideas that one religion is as good as another, and all children have a universal sentiment inside that lets them experience God. There is no body of research to prove Montessori education is in any way superior to traditional education. Save your money and your child's soul by keeping them out of these learning institutions. Warn other parents who send their children to a Montessori School. After learning about Dr. Maria Montessori, I'll be putting my copy of The Mass Explained to Children next to my Fulton Sheen Missal, in my library section "Know Thy Enemy."
This Dr. Montessori would be held in high esteem in the V2 sect and by the champion of indifferentism and modernism, Mr. Bergoglio himself. The seeds of modernism have given poisonous fruits !
ReplyDeleteMerry Christmas to you, Introibo and to all readers !
Simon,
DeleteA very Merry Christmas to your family and you, my friend!
To all my loyal readers--Merry Christmas!
---Introibo
Thanks for this valuable information as always. The madness is everywhere.
DeleteA very Merry Christmas to all.
Vendee Victores,
DeleteThe madness is everywhere and is getting worse. Pray much!
Merry Christmas and God Bless,
---Introibo
Maybe the inquisition wasn’t so bad?
ReplyDelete@anon7:11
DeleteI agree! Bring it back! See my post
https://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2020/09/inquisition-apologetics.html
God Bless,
---Introibo
I know what I’m asking for this Christmas in that case! -Ryan
DeleteRyan,
DeleteLol! May we all get that glorious present!
Merry Christmas and God Bless,
---Introibo
It seems some kind of common thread links errors such as reincarnation, evolutionism, the "all-is-one" or "god and the universe are the same" kind of thing. In all of them, there is no intrinsic value in objective truth; in all of them, what is true does not matter. All subjectivism is related to this. They believe in no external God to tell them things; so they look within and, in the darkness of original sin, mistake quasi-religious sentiments for some kind of spiritual experience. Turns out to be related to a kind of daydreaming I guess. Just my 2-cents on what appears to be the two main and opposing schools of thought (generally speaking) regarding, well, everything.
ReplyDeletecairsahr__stjoseph,
DeleteYou are correct. If you listened to my podcast on the occult with Mr. Kevin Davis at Catholic Family Podcast, I talk about the occult having as one of its major elements pantheism and panentheism. This idea of "God (sic) and the universe are the same" is at the heart of pagan religions formerly almost non-existent in Western Countries (Hinduism, Buddhism, etc.). It is also a driving force in the occult revival.
The Christian and occult worldviews are heading for a showdown soon. Most will be on the side of occult pantheism.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Introibo,
ReplyDeleteA question on matrimony: suppose one was married in the Novus Ordo, by a priest most certainly in the N.O. with invalid new orders, and that the couple remember some sort of "catholic" prep and perhaps a confession (again, N.O., and perhaps even a bad one at that, as they can't recall). The couple has since converted and made a good general confession. Does the couple need to do anything more, since their memories on a pre-nuptial confession are doubtful? It is my understanding that everything is now "valid", but recent study has confused me.
Thank you,
-S.T.
Seeking Truth,
DeleteA marriage between two validly baptized non-Catholics (V2 sect included) witnessed and not having any impediments (e.g., phony "annulments") is Sacramental. They are not bound by the canonical form of the Church. The bride and groom administer the Sacrament to each other--no priest (valid or invalid) is necessary. Also, it is not necessary for validity to have a premarital "course" on Matrimony, nor is validity affected by mortal sin (it would be a sin of sacrilege to receive Matrimony not in the state of Grace).
Therefore, the couple was valid even prior to conversion. (See e.g., theologian Ott "Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma" [1955], pgs. 460-469).
God Bless,
---Introibo
Introibo,
DeleteThank you for the response. That clears things up. I believe missing the distinction on whether or not a marriage is bound by the canonical form is what confused me. If I understand the section from Ott's work, sacramental Grace will return to said couple after conversion and being in a state of Grace. Since it is almost certain the couple was not in a state of Grace at the time of matrimony, and the ceremony was sacrilegious, would they need to confess specifically for that, or not, as they most likely sinned materially (as good recollection is lacking)?
Thank you for your post, a reminder that we often need to question things we’ve heard, such as that Montessori schools are “good”.
Merry Christmas!
-S.T.
Seeking Truth,
DeleteThey can confess specifically or if uncertain about it, and sincerely believing it need not be specifically confessed, it would be forgiven as the person confessing was in good faith. The sacramental grace of Holy Matrimony will then revive.
God Bless and Merry Christmas, my friend!
---Introibo
Hello Introibo:
ReplyDeleteI am the person who asked about Robert Kennedy's funeral Mass in 1967 being valid. You said that it was invalid because of the new canon being used.
I am also the person who asked about John F. Kennedy's funeral Mass in 1963 being valid. I assume that the 1962 Mass was used and that you might think that it's valid? It can be seen on YouTube.
Thank you. Anonymous
@anon5:12
DeleteJFK's Mass was unquestionably VALID. In 1963 the 1962 Missal was in use and all priests and bishops were valid. JFK was the first--and probably last--true Roman Catholic President. Biden (assuming he even knows who he is) is neither Catholic nor President.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Hello Introibo:
ReplyDelete1. I believe that in some places a couple can marry legally with no witnesses. For example, a non Catholic couple gets a marriage license, and then has their wedding ceremony with only themselves and the judge/clerk/minister present. Of course afterwards they file the license and get a marriage certificate as proof of their wedding. The couple later wants to convert to Catholicism. Because of their wedding having no witnesses, do they have to have a Catholic ceremony?
2. You said above that Biden is not Catholic. Do you mean that he is an apostate, but was probably validly baptized?
3. You have mentioned that you are an attorney. What do you think of the TV show Perry Mason, and is it accurate?
4. What would you suggest to a woman who is interested in a traditional Catholic religious vocation, but so far it is not happening, and she does not want to get married, although she does not have any impediments to marriage?
@anon7:22
Delete1. They are Sacramentally married as long as there is a witness--which can be the justice of the peace, or whomsoever they exchanged vows before; additional witnesses are not necessary since they are not bound by the canonical form.
2. I have no doubt Biden was validly baptized pre-Vatican II. He apostatized to the V2 sect from the beginning. So, yes, he is an apostate. Moreover, he stands for things ostensibly against even his own sect, e.g., abortion on demand, sodomite "marriage," etc. He gave up the Catholic Faith long ago.
3. Perry Mason is not at all accurate! We used to make fun of it in law school (along with "Matlock" and a few others). Here is the plot of every episode:
a) Mason, a dedicated criminal defense attorney, gets a client who is a pillar of the community. The poor guy was framed for a murder that he didn't commit.
b) Mason never asks the DA for a plea bargain, nor does he get his client off on reasonable doubt.
c) With the help of his PI friend, and the lady who works in his office, he deduces who the real murderer is and where to find him
d) He gets the murderer into court, on the stand, and questions him until he breaks down and cries--admitting in front of judge and jury that he is the real killer.
Yeah. OK.
The best show that is very accurate on criminal law is the smash comedy movie "My Cousin Vinny."
4. Why is the religious vocation "not happening"? Has she been rejected? If she is not accepted, and does not desire marriage, she can live a holy and pleasing life in the single vocation. See my post:
https://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2020/12/single-minded-devotion.html
God Bless,
---Introibo
Hello Introibo:
DeleteAbout question #4:
What do you think of consecrated virginity in the Novus Ordo?
Where a woman(it's only for women) actually has a ceremony where she becomes a consecrated virgin, often wearing a white dress and veil, and often lying prostrate on the floor at the local cathedral, usually with the local bishop and sometimes hundreds of people present?
There is information on the Internet about this.
Thank you. Anonymous.
@anon4:07
DeletePersonally, I think consecrated virginity should go with the religious life. A single person should make a private promise that can be revoked at a later time if they decide to seek marriage
God Bless,
---Introibo.
Hello Introibo:
ReplyDeleteI realized that I said that Robert Kennedy's funeral was in 1967. It was actually in 1968. Sorry!
Thank you. Anonymous
@anon1:15
DeleteNo problem, as the all-English "Canon" with the bastardized Words of Consecration was introduced in 1967. It would be invalid in 1967 as much as it would 1968.
Merry Christmas and God Bless,
---Introibo
Hello Introibo and dear readers
ReplyDeleteMay you all have a very blessed,holy and grace filled Christmas.
I was ask for your prayers for me.I had been interested in courting a Novus Ordo Indian woman for many months whom I had met at work.I found out several weeks ago that she has just been leading me on.She had been spreading false gossip about me and had try to block advancement in employment for me.She had been "married" before to a non Christian (Hindu)with a child but got a divorce.I thought she had some Faith as she had a rosary in her automobile.It comes to light that she goes out at the weekends to nightclubs,etc.I feel quite sad because I thought she was a decent person whom I could convert to the Traditional Faith.It also comes out she is a gold digger.I am very heartbroken.
I now realise that I have to trust God that someone ellse whom I can have a decent courtship and whom I can trust will come along.
Thank you Introibo and dear readers.May God bless you all
Dave
Dave,
DeleteMy prayers for you and I ask all my readers to do the same. Follow Christ and it will all work out, even as you go through great hurt now. As a word of advice, try dating a woman in no way connected to the V2 sect--like my wife. Most V2 sect women are not sincerely religious or care about religion (in my experience).
Merry Christmas and God Bless,
---Introibo
Prayers for you Dave.God has saved you from a unhappy life.That woman would drag you and your possible children to hell.
ReplyDeleteJames
James,
DeleteVery true. Thank you for your charity and prayers for Dave.
Merry Christmas and God Bless,
---Introibo
Introibo
ReplyDeleteWhat is your thoughts about converting a woman who was raised a hindu but does not really believe in it and has no problem eating beef(a no no in the false hindu religion)Do you know any success stories?
I will be praying for you Dave and will remember you in the Christmas day Masses tomorrow.Trust Christ and our Blessed Mother.
Merry Christmas and God bless
@anon1:22
DeleteFr. DePauw's sister. Mother Marie, converted many pagans in the Belgian Congo. It's always possible to convert them and we must try. See my post:
https://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2020/05/when-strangers-come-knocking-part-9_4.html
May God work through you to effectuate this conversion!
I'll be remembering you at the Holy Sacrifice as well.
Merry Christmas and God Bless,
---Introibo
I would be interested to know Introibo what qualities should a woman should have before courtship.What red flags should a man watch out for?The Sacrament of Marriage is very serious and in these evil times one has to be very careful.Merry Christmas and God bless.
ReplyDelete@anon2:25
DeleteI gave the following advice to a young man who wrote to me via these comments, and I replied privately to him. It is still good advice. Do not date women who:
*lie during courtship. What else could they be hiding?
* have children out of wedlock. Indicative of loose morals
*Make it clear they do not want children or "only want one"
* are into occult practices (use of Ouija boards, yoga before statues of Hindu "gods"," Reiki, etc.)
Those are big RED FLAGS. Other tips:
*Never date anyone in the V2 sect, or anyone who is not genuinely open to Traditionalists and conversion.
* Never date anyone if you find out they cheated on a past boyfriend. Cheaters rarely stop.
*Don't compromise on things that are VERY important to you. It's something many will seriously regret. Discuss what's important early in the relationship. If they don't give an enthusiastic answer you want, end it. Otherwise, you waste your time.
* You can find someone who has almost everything that would make a good spouse, but your personalities clash. She may be right for marriage BUT NOT RIGHT FOR YOU!
Hope this helped!
Merry Christmas and God Bless,
---Introibo
*
Introibo.
ReplyDeleteDo you have any idea how many folk attend the SSPV in the State of New York?What about the SSPX?
@anon2:55
DeleteI have no statistics, but the SSPV is definitely growing. On Long Island, they have a Church and a newly opened Chapel in the school made open to the public. The SSPX Chapel lost members over the antics of Bergoglio. That's awesome!
Merry Christmas and God Bless,
---Introibo
Above is an interesting question.What do you think of woman who go to nightclubs and bars.
ReplyDeleteIntroibo.We have are having Christmas Mass offered for you and your family.Thank you so much for all you do for us.Keep up the writing.
A blessed and grace-filled Christmas you and all readers.God bless
@anon3:20
DeleteWomen and men who go to nightclubs and bars are not people I would associate with or consider friends. I am very anti-liquor (I don't drink), and those places are occasions of sin. Many women here in NYC have had their drinks drugged and have gotten raped. That's my opinion on bars and clubs--more evil than anything good will come from them.
Thank you for the Holy Mass being offered! I need all the grace I can get! It's for people like you that I keep writing.
Merry Christmas and God Bless,
---Introibo
Introbio and all readers,
ReplyDeleteMerry Christmas! May the newborn Divine Redeemer bless you and your families!
God Bless,
Paweł