Mediatrix Of All Grace

 

During the days of the last true pope, His Holiness Pope Pius XII, the pontiff had requested some theologians to become part of a commission to survey the world's bishops regarding their opinion on a dogmatic definition of the Blessed Virgin Mary as Mediatrix of All Grace. Anticipating a positive outcome of the poll, the Holy Father also instructed them to prepare a draft of an Apostolic Constitution defining the dogma. Fr. DePauw knew at least two theologians appointed to that commission, and he too, believed that Mary's role as Mediatrix could (and should) be formally defined ex cathedra as a dogma of Divine and Catholic Faith.

Less than a year later, Pope Pius XII died, and Roncalli ("Pope" John XXIII) scrapped the entire project as being "offensive to Protestants." Then there was to be an entire document on the Mother of God at Vatican II. The orthodox theologians in the Preparatory Commission drew up the schemata to be named  DOGMATIC CONSTITUTION ON THE BLESSED VIRGIN MARY, MOTHER OF GOD, AND MOTHER OF MEN. Within it, Mary was defined as Mediatrix of All Grace. It, too, was relegated to the trash bin by a slim majority of  stalwart Modernist bishops. The final vote to retain the Constitution failed; 1,097  bishops voted to keep the Constitution on the Blessed Virgin Mary, and 1,114 bishops voted to completely eliminate the Constitution altogether. 

The Modernists at the Robber Council had a particular hatred for Mary's prerogative and title as Mediatrix of All Grace. In his Theological Highlights of Vatican II, Joseph Ratzinger ("Pope Benedict XVI") discussed the decision on the separate schema, as well as the content of the text on Our Lady (Ratzinger was a peritus or "theological expert" who helped and advised the ringleader of the Modernists at the Council--Joseph Cardinal Frings):

It was without doubt an explicitly ecumenical decision when the Council decided in the fall of 1964 to incorporate the schema on Mary as a chapter in the schema on the Church. . . . In the text, which replaced an earlier draft, the old systematic Mariology was to a considerable extent (though not completely) supplanted by a positive and scriptural Mariology. Speculation was replaced by inquiry about the events of salvation history and these have been interpreted in the light of faith. The idea of Mary as ‘co-redemptrix’ is gone now, as is the idea of Mary as ‘mediatrix of all graces.’ The text still retains a vestige of the latter title when it says that the custom has developed in the Church of addressing Mary as mediatrix as well as with other titles, but this undoubtedly is very different from saying that she is mediatrix of all graces. (Emphasis mine).

The Modernists wanted to go even further in their quest to belittle Mary into obscurity, but being as wise as the Serpent of Old (their Infernal Father), they knew better, or they would jeopardize everything they sought to do. As arch-heretic Fr. Yves Congar, another peritus, wrote:

I saw there a drama which I have experienced all my life. The need to fight, in the name of the Gospel and of apostolic faith, against a development, a Mediterranean and Irish proliferation, of a mariology which does not come from Revelation, but is backed up by pontifical texts. . . . We tell each other we must not be too antagonistic, for fear of bringing about worse than what we are anxious to avoid.

(See My Journal of the Council, entry for September 22, 1961). Note well, that the despicable Congar thinks pontifical texts are in no way a development and explanation of the Deposit of Revelation, but something alien to it and even opposed to it. 

Title and Prerogative of "Co-Redemptrix" NOT as Hated by Modernists

While the proposed schema also included a definition of Mary as Co-Redemptrix, it was not as opposed or hated by the Modernists as Mediatrix of All Grace. The reason was because the Modernists believed that those who are not learned could easily misconstrue the teaching on Mary's Co-Redemption, and be led into heresy. (Fred and Bobby Dimond reject the title Co-Redemptrix altogether due to their culpable ignorance in all things theological). If Mary is Co-Redemptrix, then could she not be said to have "offered her Divine Son" and therefore be considered a priest? (This would open the path to "priestesses" and would be radically ecumenical). 

Around 1870, the idea of living as a victim began to gain popularity among a number of generous souls, especially women religious, who proposed to assist the priests through their prayers and sacrifices. They thought naturally of Mary praying and offering herself for and with her son, and they loved to consider her as their sacerdotal virgin or the virgin Priest. This devotion aroused great enthusiasm, and was at times expressed in formulas scarcely theological.

In 1873, Pope Pius IX approved a book written by Msgr. van den Berghe entitled Mary and the Priesthood. In it, the author employs the term "Virgin Priest." The Pope justified its use by the fact of Mary's role in the sacrifice of Jesus as divini sacrificii socia (or "an associate of the Divine Sacrifice").  In 1906, Pope St. Pius X granted an indulgence for a prayer containing the invocation, "Mary, Virgin Priest, pray for us." Pope St. Pius X explained this designation by stating, with St. Antonius of Florence, that, although Mary had never received the sacrament of Holy Orders, she nevertheless possesses as much dignity and grace as are found in the priesthood.  

During the reign of Pope Benedict XV, the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the  Holy Office issued a decree stating:

After mature examination the Eminent Cardinals, general inquisitors of the Holy Office, have decided that images of the Blessed Virgin Mary wearing priestly vestments are not approved. (April 8,1916)

In reality, the representation in question was that of an orante (i.e., a female figure in the posture of prayer in ancient Greek art) which some persons mistook for Mary vested as a priest. 

In 1927, the Holy Office opposed the propagation of devotion to the "Virgin Priest." Even though only the picture and the spread of this devotion have been forbidden, the Holy Office was unfavorable to this title, since it might lead poorly-instructed Catholics to believe that Mary had received the sacrament of Holy Orders or is to be considered a "female priest." Yet these decrees of the Holy Office in no way affected the pronouncements of Popes Pius IX and St. Pius X that Mary was "an associate of the Divine Sacrifice," and that she was enriched with "as much dignity and grace as are found in the priesthood." 

One can see how, if not precisely defined, this doctrine of Co-Redemptrix could be the subject of aversion to those who fear Mary leading the way to female priests, or manipulated to make other simple people believe that women can be priestesses. Realizing this double danger, the Holy Office acted. At the Robber Council, the Modernists were well aware how they could sell a false interpretation of this doctrine to the detriment of the Blessed Mother and the faithful. 

(See historian Samaha, Priestly Dimension of Mary, University of Dayton, [2000], for historical information I used above). 

Mediatrix of All Grace

In this section, the prerogative and title Mediatrix of All Grace, given to the Most Immaculate Virgin Mary shall be explained so that all might understand it, appreciate it, and realize why the Modernists hate it so much. I have compiled and condensed the Mariology works of theologians Garrigou-Lagrange, Pohle, O'Connell, Neubert, and Carol. I take credit only for condensing the information from these sources. Furthermore, I have avoided, as much as possible, technical theological terminology that would need elaboration. In this way, I hope to make the explanations as easy to understand as possible for the average Traditionalist who has no advanced study in philosophy or theology.

---Introibo

1.  The Meaning of the Prerogative

Mary is the one through whom all graces are bestowed upon humanity. Just as no one goes to the Father, except through Jesus Christ, so too, no one goes to Jesus except through His Immaculate Mother. By the term "all grace" it is meant just that: all sanctifying grace, actual grace, infused virtues, the Gifts of the Holy Ghost, and all favors in the natural order (insofar as they may help attain eternal life) come to us through Mary. Why do all graces come through Mary? Primarily, because she gave us the author of grace, the God-Man Jesus Christ through her virginal womb. Secondarily, through her participation in her Divine Son's Passion as Co-Redemptrix, she subordinately to Christ and in virtue of His power, cooperated in His redemptive work, and she should therefore have a certain right to cooperate with Him in the distribution of the graces He so merited. 

Protestants will object that the Bible teaches there is but one Mediator between God and humanity; Jesus Christ (See, e.g., 1 Timothy 2:5).  However, while this is true, Mary, as Mother of God and Mother of Men, serves as a bond between people and her Son. Her mediation, far from diminishing or replacing that of Christ, results from His mediation and seems to complete it: it is carried out under Christ and in union with Christ from Whom it receives all its efficacy. 

Mary, by her intersession, allows all graces to flow to humanity throughout all space and time. Those prior to Mary's Assumption received grace in view of the future merits of Our Lady, and since her Assumption, all receive grace through her intercession. This does not mean we must ask for God's grace in Mary's name, but rather, whether she is invoked or not, we get the graces through her intercession. 

2. Holy Scripture indicates this prerogative

In Genesis 3:15 we read, "I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; They will strike at your head, while you strike at their heel." Our Lady is shown as intimately united with Christ in the whole process of redemption. Since the actual dispensation of grace is but an aspect of that whole process, it follows that Mary should be part of it. Mary's intercessory power is seen at the first miracle of Christ wrought at Cana (St. John 2:1-11), and in the sanctification of St. John the Baptist while in the womb of St. Elizabeth (St. Luke 1:41). 

3. Sacred Tradition indicates this prerogative 

There is no exact explicit mention of Mary as the "Mediatrix" in the first few centuries. but the root of the teaching was definitely with the Church Fathers:

St. Ambrose of Milan (c. 339-397) wrote:

Mary was alone when the Holy Spirit came upon her and overshadowed her. She was alone when she saved the world — operata est mundi salutem – and when she conceived the redemption of all — concepit redemptionem universorum.

St. Ephraem of Syria (c. 306-373) called Mary the “dispensatrix of all goods.”

St. Cyril of Alexandria (d. 444) wrote:

Hail, Mary, Mother of God, by whom all faithful souls are saved.

Mary, as Mediatrix of All Grace, is implicitly revealed in the different titles which Tradition gives Mary—that of Mother of God, most powerful in intercession with her Son, that of the new Eve intimately associated with the Redeemer, that of Mother of all men. Besides, it is a doctrine explicitly and formally affirmed by the morally unanimous consent of Fathers and Doctors of the Church, of preaching throughout the Church, and of the Liturgy. 

4. The Magisterium positively teaches the prerogative through papal pronouncements

We judge nothing more powerful and better for this purpose than by religion and devotion to deserve well of the great Mother of God, the Virgin Mary, who is the treasurer of our peace with God, and the mediatrix  of graces....(Pope Leo XIII, Supremi Apostolatus officio; Emphasis mine).

... it is right to say, that nothing at all of that very great treasury of all grace which the Lord brought us--for 'grace and truth came through Jesus Christ' (Jn 1.17)--nothing is imparted to us except through Mary, since God so wills, so that just as no one can come to the Father except through the Son, so in general, no one can come to Christ except through His Mother. (Pope Leo XIII,  Octobri mense; Emphasis mine).

Hence that never dissociated manner of life and labors of the Mother and the Son... . there stood by the Cross of Jesus His Mother, not merely occupied in looking at the dreadful sight, but even rejoicing that 'her only Son was being offered for the salvation of the human race; and so did she suffer, with Him, that if it had been possible, she would have much more gladly suffered herself all the torments that her Son underwent' (St. Bonaventure I. Sent. d, 48, ad Litt. dub. 4). Now from this common sharing of will and suffering between Christ and Mary, she 'merited to become most worthily the Reparatrix of the lost world' (Eadmer, De Excellentia Virginis Mariae, 9) and therefore Dispensatrix of all the gifts which Jesus gained for us by His Death and by His Blood.... But Mary as St. Bernard fittingly remarks (De Aquaeductu 4) is the 'channel' or, even, the neck, through which the body is joined to the head, and likewise through which the head exerts its power and strength on the body. 'For she is the neck of our Head, by which all spiritual gifts are communicated to His Mystical Body.' (Pope St. Pius X, Ad diem illum; Emphasis mine). 

For he [St. Dominic] knew well that Mary ... has such influence with her divine Son, that He confers whatever of graces He confers on humans, does so always with her as minister and decision-maker. (Pope Benedict XV, Fausto appetente die; Emphasis mine).

... we know also that all things are imparted to us from God the Greatest and Best, through the hands of the Mother of God. (Pope Pius XI, Ingravescentibus malis; Emphasis mine).

... having been associated, as Mother and Minister, with the King of martyrs in the ineffable work of human Redemption, she is always associated, with a practically measureless power, in the distribution of the graces that derive from the Redemption.... And her kingdom is as vast as that of her Son and God, since nothing is excluded from her dominion. (Pope Pius XII, Radio Address to Fatima, May 13, 1946; Emphasis mine). 

Objection: Sacramental graces are effectuated ex opere operato ("by the work worked [done]"). As long as the proper administer uses the correct matter and form, with the intention to do what the Church does, the sacrament will confer grace to any recipient who does not place an obstacle (obex) in the way. Therefore, Mary is not needed, and does not dispense sacramental graces.  

Reply: Mary mediates sacramental grace in two ways. Remotely, she gave us Christ, Who as True God and True Man instituted the sacraments; and sacramental grace was merited by her together with, and subordinately to, Jesus Christ as Co-Redemptrix.  Proximately, to have the very desire to receive the sacraments, and the proper dispositions to do so worthily, are the effects of actual graces which come about only through the intercession of Mary Immaculate. 

Conclusion

It is of utmost importance that we understand, value, and defend the dignity of Mary, Mother of God. The Vatican II sect downplays or denies her prerogatives. It destroys her Holy Rosary by adding "Luminous (Illuminati) Mysteries" that are man-centered and Modernist. How can you pray the Rosary at all during the bantering back and forth that goes on at the Novus Bogus bread and wine service that makes a mockery of her Divine Son? Some Vatican II sect "theologians" even dare to call into question her perpetual virginity. 

A Traditionalist will recite thousands upon thousands of times during his life the hallowed phrase: "Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us, sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen." If you want Mary praying for you at "the hour of your death," I can think of no better way to ensure that than by defending her prerogatives and honor now. 

Singing For Satan---Special Edition

 

From August 2017 to August 2019, I ran a series of posts exposing the evil in rock, pop, and rap music, and I called the series of posts "Singing For Satan." Although that "first Monday of the month" series ended four years ago, I reserved the right to bring up another post on the topic if I thought any artist(s) not previously covered needed to be exposed. I feel the necessity to present the facts on three of the most popular (and most wicked) singers since I ended my coverage. I will reproduce the brief overview that accompanied the Singing For Satan series before exposing the artists. Due to the visibility of these singers, I did research into their music recently; it did not come from prior research as was the case in my other Singing For Satan posts. God bless you all, my dear readers---Introibo

The Introduction to the original series of posts:

This week I continue my series of posts regarding an informal study I undertook in the early 1990s regarding rock and pop music. The purpose of my study (and the background to it) can be read in the first installment of August 7, 2017. If you have not read that post, I strongly encourage you to do so before reading this installment. I will only repeat here the seven (7) evil elements that pervade today's music:

1. Violence/Murder/Suicide

2. Nihilism/Despair

3. Drug and alcohol glorification

4. Adultery/ Fornication and sexual perversion

5. The occult

6. Rebellion against lawful superiors

7. Blasphemy against God, Jesus Christ in particular, and the Church

 The exposing of the bands/artists continues.

WARNING!! This post contains material that is extremely graphic, and may be found very disturbing. Reader discretion is advised.

Taylor Swift, P!nk, and Demi Lovato

Arguably the most popular performing artist today, Taylor Swift (b. 1989) has a veritable army of devoted young fans (primarily--but by no means exclusively--10 to 25 years old) known as "Swifties." She has sold approximately 114 million albums to date and is worth an estimated $740 million dollars according to Forbes magazine. Her short biography runs thus:

Taylor Alison Swift is a multi-Grammy award-winning American singer-songwriter. As one of the most popular contemporary female recording artists, she is known for narrative songs about her personal life, which has received much media attention. In 2010 at the age of 20, became the youngest artist in history to win the Grammy Award for Album of the Year. In 2011 Swift was named Billboard’s Woman of the Year.

Born in Pennsylvania, she grew up in the suburban Philadelphia area. Her eponymous debut album in 2006 peaked at number five on Billboard 200 and spent the most weeks on the chart in the 2000s. As a songwriter, Swift has received awards from the Nashville Songwriters Association and the Songwriters Hall of Fame. She is also the recipient of ten Grammy Awards, five Guinness World Records, one Emmy Award, 23 Billboard Music Awards, 11 Country Music Association Awards, eight Academy of Country Music Awards, and one Brit Award. Swift is one of the best-selling artists of all time, having sold more than 40 million albums—including 27.1 million in the US—and 130 million single downloads. She has appeared in Time’s 100 most influential people in the world (2010 and 2015), Forbes’ top-earning women in music (2011–2015), Forbes‘ 100 most powerful women (2015) and Forbes Celebrity 100 (2016). She was the youngest woman to be included in the third of these and ranked first in Celebrity 100. (See short-biography.com/taylor-swift.htm). Swift "identifies" as Christian, but there is no mention of her denomination.

In 2011, Vatican II sect "Archbishop" John Clayton Nienstedt (b. 1947) of the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis in Minnesota, had this to say about Taylor Swift:

And here is the best part[about Swift]: her lyrics are pro-parent and pro-family. She speaks about her relationship with Mom and Dad, on being nice, putting bullies in their place and backing up friends...It is refreshing to find a popular, musical role model who is focused on friends, friendship and family values. 

(See thecatholicspirit.com/only-jesus/bringing-a-musical-role-model-to-my-attention).

This is the common view of Swift that many still hold. However, the claim does not hold up under inspection. (N.B. "Archbishop" Nienstedt resigned his bishopric in 2015 after the County Prosecutor announced he was bringing criminal charges and initiating a civil suit against the archdiocese for failing to protect children from sexual abuse. Nienstedt was also accused of sexual misconduct against seminarians and other young men). 

Taylor Swift: Promoting Sodomites

Swift's song You Need To Calm Down (2019), is about the alleged "overreaction" of Christianity to sexual perversion. In the music video for You Need to Calm Down, Swift features nearly a whole parade of  sodomites and homo-activists. She even wears a wig with the same colors as the bisexual flag. Spin magazine quotes her as saying, "Rights are being stripped from basically everyone who isn’t a straight white cisgender male."

You are somebody that I don't know

But you're taking shots at me like it's Patrón

And I'm just like "Damn, it's 7:00 a.m."

Say it in the street, that's a knock-out

But you say it in a Tweet, that's a cop-out

And I'm just like, "Hey, are you okay?"

And I ain't trying to mess with your self-expression

But I've learned the lesson that stressin'

And obsessin' 'bout somebody else is no fun

And snakes and stones never broke my bones so

So, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh

You need to calm down

You're being too loud

And I'm just like oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh (oh)

You need to just stop

Like, can you just not step on my gown?

You need to calm down

You are somebody that we don't know

But you're coming at my friends like a missile

Why are you mad?

When you could be GLAAD? (You could be GLAAD)

Sunshine on the street at the parade

But you would rather be in the dark ages

Making that sign, must've taken all night

You just need to take several seats and then try to restore the peace

And control your urges to scream about all the people you hate

'Cause shade never made anybody less gay so

So, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh

You need to calm down

You're being too loud

And I'm just like oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh (oh)

You need to just stop

Like, can you just not step on his gown?

You need to calm down

And we see you over there on the internet

Comparing all the girls who are killing it

But we figured you out

We all know now, we all got crowns

You need to calm down

Oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh

You need to calm down (you need to calm down)

You're being too loud (you're being too loud)

And I'm just like oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh (oh)

You need to just stop (can you stop?)

Like, can you just not step on our gowns?

You need to calm down (Emphasis mine).

In the lyrics, GLAAD is an acronym for Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation. She claims those opposed to sodomites "hate them." In reality, telling someone their morally wrong and need to repent is pure charity. This song is not an isolated event in Swift's career. According to one institution of higher education:

Taylor Swift has been a longtime ally and advocate for the LGBTQ+ community — a fact she makes clear in her hit song, “You Need to Calm Down.”

Swift, a donor and supporter of groups such as GLAAD and others; her “The Eras Tour” is among the most inclusive LGBTQ+ concerts.

Craig Loftin, lecturer in American studies at Cal State Fullerton, said Swift is part of several 21st-century artists unafraid to stand up for the LGBTQ+ community.

Loftin mentioned other famous pop stars, such as Madonna, as celebrities who were open about supporting the queer community in the 1980s and 1990s when it was unpopular and uncommon.

Loftin said: “Taylor Swift is one of several 21st-century pop music stars who openly cultivate an LGBTQ following in a much more direct and open manner than pop stars in the past, even flamboyant gay pop stars like Boy George who felt tremendous pressure to lie about their sexuality in order to have their big-time careers in the 1980s.” 

“There is tremendous progress in the acceptance of LGBTQ people in American culture and society (despite the current backlash against transgender visibility in many states).”

(See fullerton.edu/press-release/taylor-swifts-popularity-with-the-lgbtq-community; Emphasis mine).

Taylor Swift: Promoting the murder of unborn children

On the joyous occasion of the United States Supreme Court overruling the murderous 1973 decision Roe v. Wade which declared a "constitutional right" to murder unborn babies, Swift denounced the June 24, 2022 pro-life decision Dobbs v. Jackson:

Taylor Swift has denounced the Supreme Court’s decision to roll back the rights of American women, by overturning of Roe v Wade...“I’m absolutely terrified that this is where we are – that after so many decades of people fighting for women’s rights to their own bodies, today’s decision has stripped us of that,” Swift wrote on Twitter.

She also re-tweeted a lengthy post by Michelle Obama, who shared her “heartbreak” over the decision.

(See independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/taylor-swift-abortion-rights-b2109009.html;Emphasis mine). Clearly Swift does not recognize the biological fact of the humanity of unborn children.

Taylor Swift: Promoting promiscuity

Swift, the "promoter of family values," shacked-up with her then boyfriend Joe Alwyn. She wrote a song celebrating their sin, and how proud she was that no one could tell her differently.

We could leave the Christmas lights up 'til January

And this is our place, we make the rules

And there's a dazzling haze, a mysterious way about you dear

Have I known you 20 seconds or 20 years?

Can I go where you go?

Can we always be this close forever and ever?

And ah, take me out, and take me home

You're my, my, my, my

Lover (Emphasis mine)

Taylor ("Not Very") Swift found out the hard way that shacking up with a "lover" gives you a less likely chance of staying together than when you have a spouse. The research tells us, for instance, that most fornicating couples who shack-up today end up like Swift and Alwyn, not even making it to the altar. One recent study found that 54% of first-time live-in fornicators saw their relationship end in a breakup within six years of moving in together, whereas only 33% had gotten married in the same time frame. (See also ifstudies.org/blog/is-cohabitation-still-linked-to-greater-odds-of-divorce). 

It's no wonder the "archbishop" sees Swift in a positive light:

According to Pew Research: 55% of Vatican II sect members (called "Catholics") see shacking-up as good as any other way of life. Most Vatican II sect members also say it is acceptable for a "same-sex couple" committing acts against nature to live together, including 46% who say this is as good as any other way of life. 

(See pewresearch.org/religion/2015/09/02/chapter-3-family-matters).

To the best of my knowledge and belief, Taylor Swift has never molested any children (or helped molesters evade the law), so by Vatican II sect clergy standards, she's a candidate for canonization.

Taylor Swift: Going "Every Witch" Way

In the video for her song "Willow" [2019], Swift inserts an unnecessary scene about witchcraft. As one viewer on the Internet stated: In Taylor Swift’s “Willow” music video, she includes occult worship, a troubling practice being normalized in culture across numerous forms of media. 

The “Willow” music video follows Swift as she tries to connect with her lover. Something always stands in their way, and they are forced to escape to different time periods where they attempt to connect again. The scenes for the first two verses find Swift in a forest and a 1920s bar before the third scene takes place during cult worship around a campfire.

This cult worship scene has no relevance to the song, nor does it tie into the scenes from the previous verses. Swift observes the occult ritual taking it in for a few moments before taking her place and joining the dance for the second half of the verse. After, she leaves to travel through time again and continue looking for her lover, whom she eventually convenes with during the final chorus of the song.

The inclusion of the campfire witchcraft scene is confusing, as it was unnecessarily added onto lyrics it has zero relevance to. Nonetheless, it provides another worrying example of the way witchcraft and pagan worship are being pushed into pop culture and becoming normalized. 

Swift has continued to tie witchcraft to this song during her Eras Tour, donning ritualistic garb while performing the song, and having her backup dancers wear capes. 

Despite her defenders saying, "it was a publicity stunt" and "people who think she's a witch (or promoting witchcraft) are crazy," it is not the first time Swift sings about the occult or dresses like a witch. In her video for the song "..Ready For It" (2017), she dresses in a witch-like cape. Her 2017 song I Did Something Bad  references witches:

They're burning all the witches, even if you aren't one

They got their pitchforks and proof

Their receipts and reasons

They're burning all the witches, even if you aren't one

So light me up (light me up), light me up (light me up)

Light me up, go ahead and light me up (light me up)

Light me up (light me up), light me up (light me up)

Light me up (light me up), light me up (light me up)

They say I did something bad

Then why's it feel so good?

They say I did something bad

But why's it feel so good?

Most fun I ever had

And I'd do it over and over and over again if I could

It just felt so good, good

Oh, you say I did something bad

Then why's it feel so good, good?

So bad, why's it feel so good?

Why's it feel, why's it feel so good? (Bad)

It just felt so good, good (Emphasis mine).

Once more, her defenders claim she's singing about a "witch-hunt" not actual witches. In the 2020 song Mad Woman, Swift again references witches:

Now I breathe flames each time I talk

My cannons all firin' at your yacht

They say, "Move on", but you know, I won't

And women like hunting witches, too

Doing your dirtiest work for you

It's obvious that wanting me dead

Has really brought you two together (Emphasis mine). 

Combine this with her pervasive use of witch imagery (even when it has no relevance to the lyrics), Swift is (at the very least) trying to normalize witchcraft and the occult. Her positions on sodomites, abortion, and promiscuity certainly don't help her case, as occultists hold the same views as she does. Note well, that Swift is constantly angry at men and seeking revenge on them (the "villains") in many of her song lyrics. This misandrist-style feminism is inherent in witchcraft.

Tickled P!ink Over Paganism

Like Taylor Swift, "Pink" (written as "P!nk") is another moral abomination. Her short bio runs as follows:

Alecia Beth Moore, known professionally as Pink (frequently stylized as P!nk), is an American singer, songwriter, dancer and actress. Alecia Beth Moore was born on September 8, 1981, in Doylestown, Pennsylvania, to nurse Judy and insurance salesman Jim Moore, a Vietnam War veteran. She is mainly an R&B and pop singer whose collaborative rendition of “Lady Marmalade” rose to #1 on the Billboard Hot 100 and earned her a Grammy Award.

She dreamed of being an Olympic athlete but developed asthma, which made singing difficult. She released her first single, “There You Go,” in 2000, after leaving the group Choice.

In 2010, she appeared on Forbes‘ “The Celebrity 100” list at #27, with earnings of $44 million. In 2011, she appeared on Forbes‘ The Top-Earning Women in Music list at #6 with earnings of $22 million, with an average of $1 million per show on the road. In 2009, Billboard put her at the 6th place on their “Money Makers” list, listing her earnings as $36,347,658. In 2013, she appeared on Forbes‘ list of “Highest Paid Musicians”, with the earnings of $32 million. (See short-biography.com/pink-singer.htm). 

Moore revealed the vile way she got her stage name. Unlike most reports that said she liked the character "Pink" in the smash 1992 movie Reservoir Dogs, the singer told how she really got her name:

Pink has admitted she was given the nickname pink because of her genitals.

The 'What About Us' singer - whose real name is Alecia Moore -famously took her nickname from Steve Buscemi's character Mr. Pink in 'Reservoir Dogs' but has admitted the origin of why that became her moniker is very raunchy.

Asked if people complained about the reference to Quentin Tarantino's violent movie, she said: "I've been receiving complaints for a very long time. I'm OK with it and for the other reason my name is Pink. That's inappropriate too. 

"My best friend had never seen a white girl's vagina before so he asked me if I could see it, so I showed it to him and he said 'It's pink!' Then my friends started calling me Mr. Pink."

(See iol.co.za/entertainment/celebrity-news/international/pnk-reveals-story-behind-her-stage-name-11874322). 

Pink and Sodomites:

Moore is very butch, having short hair and manly features. It was long rumored that she was bisexual. Here's what she had to say:

The singer, who is currently on her Truth About Love world tour, says her LGBT fans have been 'the most loyal part' of what she does.

'They've been my most loyal friends, to be honest,' she told Anderson-Minshall.

'I've had a lot of my gay boys around, but my gay girls are my rootstalk. They're my honesty in an ocean of bulls**t.

'I should be gay by the way that I look and the way that I am. I just happen to not be. But it just makes perfect and complete sense.'

Still, she's no fan of labels.

'I loved my little girlfriends and we kissed and we had a great time and we held hands,' Pink said.

'When I first moved to Los Angeles, I was an honourary lesbian of Los Angeles.

'I wasn't gay, but all my girlfriends were. So no, it wasn't a big deal for me, but when (a tabloid) comes out and says, I just said I was bisexual, it's like what? That wasn't my truth, and I like truth. I like absolute truth.' (See dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2212836/Pink-opens-sexuality-marriage-motherhood-The-Advocate.html; Emphasis mine).

 Apparently, Pink doesn't like God's absolute truth that homosexuality is one of the Four Sins That Scream to Heaven for Vengeance. 

Her lurid 2010 song Raise Your Glass, has a video featuring a sodomite "wedding" with two men kissing. According to one source:

Pink explained the gay wedding scene by saying, “I threw my best friend’s wedding in my backyard. She is gay and it was a beautiful ceremony. At the end of it, her mom said, ‘Why can’t that be legal?’ and started crying. It was the most heartbreaking thing I’ve ever seen and that’s why I’m doing it in my video.” This was five years before sodomite "marriage" was declared a "right" by the U.S. Supreme Court. 

When it comes to purity, Moore leaves nothing to the imagination as to what she believes in her obscenity-laced song Slut Like You (2012):

I'm not a slut, I just love love

Tell me something new

'Cause I've heard this

Okay, I'll f**k you

A little taste test

You'll be my little friend

You'll be my little friend

You'll be my little friend

And they think we fall in love

But that's not it

Just want to get some

Ain't that some sh*t?

You'll be my little friend

You'll be my little friend

You'll be my little friend

Yeah, yeah, yeah!

I got a little piece of you-hoo

And it's just like woo-hoo

Wham bam, thank you ma'am

Woo-hoo!

I'm a slut like you

You say you're looking for a foo-ool

And I'm just like me too

I'm gonna let ya know the truth

I'm a slut like you

Sitting with my friends

And we're picking who we might let in

Them boys are starving

They're just our little friend

They're just our little friend

They're just our little friend

Listen, you little fu**er

You think you call the shots

I just bought you some

Drink up your rides gone

This might be fun

You're now my little friend

You're now my little friend

You're now my little friend

Yeah, yeah, yeah

I got a little piece of you-hoo

And it's just like woo-hoo

Wham bam, thank you ma'am

Woo-hoo!

I'm a slut like you, I'm a slut like you

You say you're looking for a foo-ool

And I'm just like me too

I'm gonna let ya know the truth

I'm a slut like you

You don't win a prize with your googly eyes

I'm not a cracker jack

You can't go inside

Unless I let you Jack or Sam

F**k, what's your name again?

You male come now

You caveman sit down

You shh, don't ruin it, wow

Check, please

I, I've got a little piece of you

And it's just like woo-hoo

Wham bam, thank you ma'am

Boo hoo

I'm a slut like you

Woo-hoo!

Looks like the joke's on you-hoo

So go home and cry like boo-hoo

I'm a slut like you

I got a little piece of you-hoo

And it's just like woo-hoo

Wham bam, thank you ma'am

Woo-hoo!

I'm a slut like you

You say you're looking for a foo-ood

And I'm just like me too

I'm gonna let ya know the truth

I'm a slut like you, slut like you (Emphasis mine; obscenities censored by me).  

This comes from a married woman with two children. God help those little ones!

Pink: Promoter of Abortion---and Proud

When the Supreme Court overruled Roe v. Wade, here is what Pink said and did:

Pink is giving a piece of her mind to people who support the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

After Roe v. Wade, the landmark case which protected one's choice to have an abortion in every state, was overturned, the "So What" singer went on a Twitter rampage and delivered a message for its supporters: Don't listen to her music.

"Let's be clear: if you believe the government belongs in a woman's uterus, a gay persons business or marriage, or that racism is okay- THEN PLEASE IN THE NAME OF YOUR LORD NEVER F---ING LISTEN TO MY MUSIC AGAIN. AND ALSO F--- RIGHT OFF. We good?" the singer, 42, wrote on Saturday night. (See people.com/music/pink-tells-fans-who-oppose-roe-v-wade-to-never-listen-to-my-music).  

I wouldn't listen to her garbage if you paid me. No rant necessary. The singer has no use for God in her life. Her father was an apostate Catholic, and her mother a Jew. She sometimes claims to be Jewish, but admits she studied Buddhism, and practices "Native American spirituality" (paganism). 

On July 14, 2022, Pink released the song Irrelevant in response to the pro-life decision which, she claims, makes women "irrelevant." She attacks Christ ('does He know I'm innocent?"), and declares herself proud to be a "heretic." The song is blasphemous and contains obscenities.  There is nothing innocent about Pink and her drive to murder the unborn. 

I think it might rain today, ash on the ground

Took all the heat we could take, and then burned it down

Now it's a real parade, we're all welcome now

As long as you feel afraid, that's what it's about

You can call me irrelevant, insignificant

You can try to make me small

I'll be your heretic, you f**king hypocrite

I won't think of you at all

Sticks and stones and all that shit

Does Jesus love the ignorant?

I like to think he'd gladly take us all

The kids are not alright, none of us are right

I'm tired, but I won't sleep tonight

'Cause I still feel alive

The kids are not alright (not alright)

None of us are right (none of us are right)

I'm tired, but I won't sleep tonight

'Cause I still feel alive

I can't tell the difference between fight or flight

I guess I'm indifferent, since I don't have the right

I stay under covers now, I'm afraid to go out

I wait for tornadoes to come take me out

You can say that I'm ignorant, insignificant

But I've been here all along

I'll be your heretic, you f**kin' hypocrite

You can't ever catch us all

Sticks and stones and all that shit

Does Jesus know I'm innocent?

I like to think he'd gladly take us all

The kids are not alright, no (not alright)

None of us are right (none of us are right)

I'm tired, but I won't sleep tonight

'Cause I still feel alive

The kids are not alright (the kids are not alright)

None of us are right (none of us are right)

I'm tired, but I won't sleep tonight

'Cause I still feel alive, oh, yeah

Girls just wanna have rights

So why do we have to fight?

Girls just wanna have rights

So why do we have to fight?

Girls just wanna have rights

So why do we have to fight? (Oh, yeah)

Girls just wanna have rights (oh, yeah)

So why do we still have to fight?

The kids are not alright, no

'Cause none of us are right

I'm tired, but I won't sleep tonight

'Cause I still feel alive

These kids are not alright, none of us are right

I'm tired, but I won't sleep tonight

I still feel alive

You can call me irrelevant, insignificant

I won't call on you at all (Emphasis and censoring of obscenities mine). 

Demi Lovato: Satan's Best Friend

Her short bio says the following:

Demetria Devonne Lovato was born on August 20, 1992, in Albuquerque, New Mexico to engineer and musician Patrick Martin Lovato (1960 — June 22, 2013) and former Dallas Cowboys cheerleader, Dianna Lee Hart (born Dianna Lee Smith; August 8, 1962). Lovato has an older sister, Dallas (born February 4, 1988); a younger maternal half-sister, actress Madison De La Garza, and an older paternal half-sister, Amber, to whom she first spoke when she was 20.

Demi Lovato started out as a child actor on Barney & Friends. In 2007, Demi Lovato got a part on a short Disney Channel show called As the Bell Rings, and then she landed the starring role of the movie Camp Rock. While filming Camp Rock, Demi Lovato began also recording three songs for the film’s soundtrack and has had several solo releases since. In 2009, Lovato got the lead in the series Sonny with a Chance, another Disney Channel show. She later became a judge on the television competition show The X Factor from 2012 to 2013. In 2015, Lovato put out a new single entitled “Cool for the Summer.” She has also tackled a variety of TV projects recently. Lovato appeared as a guest judge on RuPaul’s Drag Race that year. (See short-biography.com/demi-lovato.htm). 

Demi Lovato: The Ultimate Pervert

According to many sources, Lovato describes her sexuality as "fluid," and has said she is open to finding love with someone of any gender. In July 2020, she labeled herself "queer" in a social media statement. In March 2021, Lovato came out as pansexual a term which really means bisexual, but was hijacked by the "alphabet mafia" (LGBTQIA++ madness) and means "all genders"--as if there were more than just two. 

After declaring herself "pansexual," Lovato said she was "just too queer" to date men at the time.(Whatever that means). On May 19, 2021, Lovato publicly came out as "non-binary" and announced the decision to change her gender pronouns to they/them, stating that "this has come after a lot of healing and self-reflective work. I'm still learning and coming into myself; I don't claim to be an expert or a spokesperson. Sharing this with you now opens another level of vulnerability for me." 

(See bbc.com/news/newsbeat-57169541).

 Interestingly, "they/them" or speaking of oneself in the plural for ordinary discourse, appears but once in the Bible--with a demoniac. 

And they came over the strait of the sea into the country of the Gerasens.

And as He went out of the ship, immediately there met Him out of the monuments a man with an unclean spirit, Who had his dwelling in the tombs, and no man now could bind him, not even with chains. For having been often bound with fetters and chains, he had burst the chains, and broken the fetters in pieces, and no one could tame him. And he was always day and night in the monuments and in the mountains, crying and cutting himself with stones. And seeing Jesus afar off, he ran and adored Him. And crying with a loud voice, he said: What have I to do with Thee, Jesus the Son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God that thou torment me not." For He said unto him: Go out of the man, thou unclean spirit.

And He asked him: What is thy name? And he saith to Him: My name is Legion, for we are many. And he besought Him much, that He would not drive him away out of the country. And there was there near the mountain a great herd of swine, feeding. And the spirits besought Him, saying: Send us into the swine, that we may enter into them. And Jesus immediately gave them leave. And the unclean spirits going out, entered into the swine: and the herd with great violence was carried headlong into the sea, being about two thousand, and were stifled in the sea. (St. Mark 5:1-13; Emphasis mine).  True popes and Kings of old used the royal "We" because kings speak for their people and the pope speaks for Christ. The idea of ordinary people speaking in that way was unthinkable and unheard of until now. 

Lovato is back to using "she/her," but is "still comfortable" with using "they/them." The singer has numerous mental issues, such as bulimia, self-harm, and bipolar disorder. She is a recovering alcoholic and drug-addict. While all of this was given medical and psychiatric help, nothing is seen as seriously wrong with her "pansexuality," and "changing pronouns" gender dysphoria. 

Demi Lovato: Encountering Aliens or Demons?

Lovato came out with they/them pronouns after having "an encounter with aliens on a UFO." Here is one source (I edited "they/them" to the correct "she/her"):

One night in October of 2020, pop sensation Demi Lovato was abducted by aliens in her sleep. At least, that’s what she believes happened to her. In the premiere episode of her new Peacock series Unidentified with Demi Lovato, the pop star unpacks her fascination with the great unknown and tries to connect with beings from another realm.

Accompanied by her best friend Matthew Scott Montgomery and her sister Dallas Lovato, Lovato—who came out as non-binary earlier this year and uses they/them pronouns—rides around California in an RV meeting other UFO enthusiasts, alien abductees, and therapists that specialize in all things extraterrestrial. As with many things UFO-related, much of Unidentified with Demi Lovato must be seen to be believed...Demi describes her experience of being contacted by aliens... "I was in my room that night and these beings were just like, ‘Do you want to come back to our planet?’ And I’m like ‘Hell yeah.’ So [laughs] I’m sucked out of my room and I’m floating over the planet. Then I woke up and that’s all I remember.”(See vanityfair.com/hollywood/2021/10/all-the-questions-i-had-while-watching-unidentified-with-demi-lovato; Emphasis mine). She claims it's "offensive" to call intelligent life forms from other planets "aliens," and they should be called "extraterrestrials." How she "knows" this is not entirely clear. 

Was this more mental instability? Quite possibly. However, after reading the next section, you might think that she made contact with Hell.

Demi Lovato: Pure Evil From Hell

In my Singing for Satan series, I covered many very wicked music performers. None of them, in my opinion, go to the depths of Lovato. Last year, she released a record called "Holy Fvck." The sheer hatred of Christ on this album, and the unabashed promotion of all that is wicked, could only come from one given over to Satan himself. It was released on August 19, 2022. 

The above poster and album cover was banned in England for the following reason:

[she is]bound up in a bondage-style outfit whilst lying on a mattress shaped like a crucifix, in a position with her legs bound to one side which was reminiscent of Christ on the cross, together with the reference to 'holy fvck', which in that context was likely to be viewed as linking sexuality to the sacred symbol of the crucifix and the crucifixion, was likely to cause serious offence to Christians.

The fact that ANY modern day country would ban something "offensive to Christians," shows you how far into depravity it goes. The title track gives Lovato the appellation "Holy F*ck" because doing what you want sexually is "holy." She even most blasphemously compares her body to the Holy Eucharist:

Like a serpent in the garden

I am truth and I am darkness

I'm an angel, I'm a demon

Just depends on what you're feeling

I'm the fruit that was forbidden

But don't keep my evil hidden

I'm the one she was afraid of

Now I'm what your dreams are made of

I'll show you the light with all the lights off

With all the lights off

I'll bring you to life, I'm a holy f**k

I'm a holy f**k (f**k)

You see me begging for permission

Let me free you from a prison

She's a novice, a beginner

I'm the sexorcist, the sinner

I can guide you, I can teach you

Honey, this is just a preview

'Cause my body's the communion

Take a bite of what I'm doing

I'll show you the light with all the lights off

With all the lights off

I'll bring you to life, I'm a holy f**k

I'm a holy f**k (f**k)

F**k

I'll show you the light with all the lights off

With all the lights off

I'll bring you to life, I'm a holy f**k

I'm a holy f**k (f**k) (Emphasis and censoring of obscenities mine). 

The song Heaven is about masturbation. According to Lovato herself "Matthew 5:30 says, 'If your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off; [for] it's better to lose one part of your body than your entire body to hell.' That was a Bible verse I heard since I was young—too young to know what masturbation was," Lovato said in an interview with the Los Angeles Times. "And now, I have my own [line of] sex toys. Masturbation can be a form of self-care, it's not something to be ashamed of at all" She says self-abuse is like Heaven and the chorus makes fun of Christ's admonition by singing "cut it off, cut it off." 

I had a secret, it killed me to keep it

Someone's to blame, but you can't blame Jesus

Huh (huh, huh)

Huh (huh, huh)

Singing hymns all alone in my basement

So close I could almost taste it

Huh (huh, huh)

Huh (huh, huh)

Cut it off, cut it off

Cut it off, cut it off

Crucified for the life I'm living

Oh my God, hope I'm forgiven

Going to hell 'cause it feels like heaven

Speaking in tongues to release my demons

I can't help it, guess I'm a heathen

Going to hell 'cause it feels like heaven

If pleasure's wrong, cast me out like a sinner

I found myself with my two little fingers

Huh (huh, huh)

Huh (huh, huh)

My right hand's got me singing my praises

Holy water and my spirit awakens

Huh (huh, huh)

Huh (huh, huh)

Cut it off, cut it off

Cut it off, cut it off

Crucified for the life I'm living

Oh my God, hope I'm forgiven

Going to hell 'cause it feels like heaven (yeah)

Speaking in tongues to release my demons

I can't help it, guess I'm a heathen

Going to hell 'cause it feels like heaven (like heaven, yeah)

la-la-la, la-la, la-la, la-la

La-la-la, la-la, la-la, la-la

La-la-la, la-la, la-la, la-la (like heaven, yeah)

Speaking in tongues to release my demons (demons)

I can't help it, guess I'm a heathen (I'm a heathen)

Going to hell 'cause it feels like heaven (like heaven, yeah) (Emphasis mine).

The song Happy Ending (also a reference to masturbation) is about how God does not accept her because of her sexuality, and she cannot find a "happy ending" of her life with God. She's also sober but misses her vices.  More blasphemy. God accepts her, not her sins.

I met god (sic)

Just for a minute

Sat in his house

Took a look around

And saw I didn't fit in

I tried love (I tried love)

Gave me something to believe in (gave me something to believe in)

Planning futures from the start, giving pieces of my heart

Just to end up leaving (just to end up leaving)

Am I gonna die trying to find my happy ending?

And will I ever know what it's like to be fine without pretending

That my skin isn't crawling

My demons aren't calling and tearing me to shreds?

Am I gonna die trying to find my happy ending?

I got high (I got high)

You name it, I've tried it (you name it, I've tried it)

Sure, I'm sober now and everybody's proud

But I miss my vices (vices)

And I tried to be your hero (and I tried to be your hero)

I lent you my voice (I lent you my voice)

I was your poster child, it was working for a while

But it didn't fill the void

Am I gonna die trying to find my happy ending?

And will I ever know what it's like to be fine without pretending

That my skin isn't crawling

My demons aren't calling and tearing me to shreds?

Am I gonna die trying to find my happy, find my happy ending?

Find my happy ending

(Whoa, whoa, whoa)

Trying to find my happy ending (Emphasis mine).

Although not on the Holy Fvck album, Lovato has a song Swine, the title track to her album this year. Remember that Christ sent the demons of the demoniac possessed by a legion of evil spirits into the pigs. In this song (2023) Lovato claims she is "swine" because she cannot "f*ck" whoever she wants, "suck" whoever she wants, and if she gets pregnant, those horrible pro-lifers "force" her to keep the baby instead of getting an abortion. It uses the "f-bomb" no less than eight times. Does this even need any commentary?

God forbid, I wanna suck whatever the f**k I wanna

God forbid, I wanna f**k whoever the f**k I want

And if he cums, I guess I gotta be a mother

F**k what I think, I don't know a thing, the government knows my body

No, it's okay, it's better this way, I'm only a carbon copy

Even if I'm dying, they'll still try to stop me

Do we even hear ourselves?

My life, my voice

My rights, my choice (oh)

It's mine

Or I'm just swine

My blood, my loins

My lungs, my noise (oh)

It's mine

Or I'm just swine

Picture your faith, imagine your God and even your Holy Bible

Is suddenly banned, do you understand? Now, doesn't that sound entitled?

It's your book, but it's my survival

We gotta grow 'em, we gotta raise 'em, we gotta feed, and bathe 'em

And if you won't, they call you a witch to burn at the stake in Salem

Thought by now they'd change, but we're still waiting

Give these motherf**kers hell

My life, my voice

My rights, my choice (oh)

It's mine

Or I'm just swine

My blood, my loins

My lungs, my noise (oh)

It's mine

Or I'm just swine

Under-compensated, too domesticated (the f**k?)

Underestimated, overregulated (the f**k?)

Under-celebrated, hate-dominated (the f**k?)

We're infuriated, got us activated (get up)

Ever-dedicated, newly motivated (get up)

And if you're awake, then I'm so glad you made it

Ah-ah-ah-ah

My life, my voice

My rights, my choice (oh)

It's mine (it's mine)

Or I'm just swine (or I'm just swine)

My blood, my loins (oh, no)

My lungs, my noise (oh)

It's mine

Or I'm just swine (Emphasis mine). 

Conclusion

These three female pop artists are singing for Satan, loud and clear. I hear a lot of Millennial women, and young daughters of people I know, listening to them and (God help us) admiring them. I remember when Fr. DePauw shared with me a letter he had received from Archbishop Richard Cushing of Boston. Cushing was made "Cardinal" by Roncalli in December of 1958. He was no friend of Tradition, being a Modernist sympathizer, and joining the Modernists at Vatican II. His Modernist-leaning ways were the proverbial "final straw" that sent Leonard Feeney into the heresy bearing his name. 

As a canonist who got around, Father knew (literally) hundreds of prelates. The letter discussed many things, but the pertinent part was a rather bold statement. Abp. Cushing said that whether the world gets better or worse, it will be based on the lives of women. A woman convinced the fist Man to sin. A woman brought forth the Savior. The saying is well known: "Behind every great man stands a good woman," be she his mother or his wife. If women choose to live like the Blessed Virgin Mary, many girls growing up, and many men, will be inspired to be good and do great things. If women act like Eve, the inspiration goes the other way--to the destruction of all.

Father smiled at me and said, "That's one time I think the archbishop got it right!" I think he was right too. With role models like these wicked three, may God save us. 

Planned Perversion

 

The year was 2002. Most of my readers will have memories that go back at least that far. In the United States, sodomy was outlawed in several States. Marriage was between one man and one woman. Pairs of homosexuals couldn't adopt children. Women were biological females and men were biological males. There were but two genders recognized by the federal government and by all State governments. Pronouns were something used without thought in correspondence to a person's sex; you didn't get to "pick" which pronouns you used or have invented pronouns like "zhe" and "hir." This was only 21 years ago.

How did things get so dystopian so quickly? Just as the creation of the Vatican II sect was a concerted effort by the enemies of Christ's One True Church, so too was the acceptance (and even celebration) of perversion. Like an Alta Vendita for sodomites, 1989 saw the publication of After The Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90s by Marshall Kirk and Dr. Hunter Madsen. A perusal of its contents will reveal that its plan to have society accept homosexuality as "normal" and as worthy of "rights" has indeed won. That victory paved the way for the "transgender" insanity that overturns objective realities for fictitious ideas. The transgenders followed the same strategy. 

This post will expose the work of Kirk and Madsen, and hopefully raise awareness of  the sodomite strategy and give the means to expose/counteract it.

WARNING!! This post contains material that is extremely graphic, and may be found very disturbing. Reader discretion is advised.

Who were Kirk and Madsen?

Dr. Marshall Kenneth Kirk (1957-2005) was a writer and a researcher in neuropsychiatry, having graduated from Harvard University with a Bachelors degree in psychology. Kirk became enamored with genealogy and was internationally known as one of the few major American authorities on medieval and ancient genealogy. He was plagued with both physical and psychological problems his whole life. A sodomite who hated Christianity, he partnered with Dr. Hunter Madsen, an advertising executive, to make homosexuality acceptable by the year 2000. 

They began by writing an essay in 1987 entitled The Overhauling of Straight America, with Madsen using the pseudonym of Erastes Pill. In that essay, the despicable duo hatched a plan to "...desensitize the public to help it view homosexuality with indifference instead of with keen emotion. Ideally, we would have straights register differences in sexual preference the way they register different tastes for ice cream or sports games: she likes strawberry and I like vanilla; he follows baseball and I follow football. No big deal." (See library.gayhomeland.org/0018/EN/EN_Overhauling_Straight.htm). Isn't that exactly how it's viewed today by the vast majority of our society?

Kirk and Madsen then expanded their plan in great detail two years later in their book After The Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90s. ("ATB"). With a well thought out plan, and sodomites in high places to put it into practice, we arrived where we are today; where a woman is given the circular definition as someone who identifies as a woman. Pure insanity.

After ATB was published, Kirk became a sodomite celebrity, appearing in Newsweek magazine, Time magazine, and the left-wing rag The Washington Post. He was found dead inside his apartment in July of 2005, approximately four and one-half months prior to what would have been his 48th birthday. No cause of death was ever given. There was speculation that he had died from AIDS due to his unnatural lifestyle, but the "powers that be" wouldn't allow that information to be made public.

If their agenda was made public, why did it work?

There are several reasons:

• people rarely pay attention to what really matters. Consider how many men can tell you every statistic on every athlete in all or most sports, but know little or nothing about the things of God

• many laughed it off as a "pipedream"

• those involved in the occult see perversion as "normal" anyway, and many occultists have societal influence. They wanted it to work. 

• the Vatican II sect had become infiltrated with sodomites and Modernists, neither of whom wanted to stop it, but wanted the plan to succeed. They put up no resistance, nor warned the people

• some well-meaning "conservative" Vatican II sect members, and Protestants who maintained traditional moral teachings on sexuality made the fatal mistake of labeling it as a "Gay Agenda Conspiracy." Conspiracies can and do happen, but with so many using the word to justify every whacky idea, many shrug it off as nonsense. 

• the lack of a true pope and the Catholic Church in Her former glory to stop it. 

Kirk and Madsen didn't want to effect mere political/legal change, rather they wanted to produce cultural change, which comes about by changing what people believe about something; changing what and how they talk about it; changing what people accept and what they value. The power of such change is that, unlike political change, it is not easily overturned because it's not dependent upon or sacrificed to the whims of elected leaders. 

The Plan Exposed

In this section, I will be quoting from ATB (as well as Kirk and Madsen's prior essay) and (a) show the step-by-step plan to normalize the abnormal and unnatural; (b) give concrete examples that demonstrate how it was actually carried out, and (c) a reality check--the facts vs. their propaganda.

Step 1:

TALK ABOUT GAYS AND GAYNESS AS LOUDLY AND AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE.

The principle behind this advice is simple: almost any behavior begins to look normal if you are exposed to enough of it at close quarters and among your acquaintances. The acceptability of the new behavior will ultimately hinge on the number of one's fellows doing it or accepting it. One may be offended by its novelty at first--many, in times past, were momentarily scandalized by "streaking,'' eating goldfish, and premarital sex. But as long as Joe Six-pack (i.e., "the average American") feels little pressure to perform likewise, and as long as the behavior in question presents little threat to his physical and financial security, he soon gets used to it and life goes on. The skeptic may still shake his head and think "people are crazy these days," but over time his objections are likely to become more reflective, more philosophical, less emotional...Constant talk builds the impression that public opinion is at least divided on the subject, and that a sizable segment accepts or even practices homosexuality. 

Even rancorous debates between opponents and defenders serve the purpose of desensitization so long as "respectable" gays are front and center to make their own pitch. The main thing is to talk about gayness until the issue becomes thoroughly tiresome...The visual media, film and television, are plainly the most powerful image-makers in Western civilization. The average American household watches over seven hours of TV daily. Those hours open up a gateway into the private world of straights, through which a Trojan horse might be passed. As far as desensitization is concerned, the medium is the message--of normalcy. So far, gay Hollywood has provided our best covert weapon in the battle to desensitize the mainstream. Bit by bit over the past ten years, gay characters and gay themes have been introduced into TV programs and films (though often this has been done to achieve comedic and ridiculous affects). On the whole the impact has been encouraging. The prime-time presentation of Consenting Adults on a major network in 1985 is but one high-water mark in favorable media exposure of gay issues. But this should be just the beginning of a major publicity blitz by gay America. (Emphasis mine).

How it worked:

Once upon a time, television looked like I Love Lucy. Ricky and Lucy, although married (both in the show and real life), they did not sleep in the same bed. When Lucy was pregnant, they could not show her bulge nor could they use the word "pregnant." Euphemisms like "expecting," "with child," and "in a family way," were substituted. To publicly acknowledge Lucy as having had sex with her husband was avoided.

Jump to 1969 and  The Brady Bunch. Mike and Carol Brady may have slept in the same bed, but even the most difficult topics, laughable by today's standards, saw resolution in thirty minutes with a return to domestic bliss. In 1975, One Day At A Time premiered. The show depicted things heretofore taboo. It centered around the character of Ann Romano, a Catholic woman who decides to divorce her caring husband of 18 years to "find herself." She drags her 17 and 16 year old daughters with her to a shabby apartment building where they meet Schneider, a lewd building superintendent always trying to seduce the women who live there. The show dealt sympathetically with divorce and remarriage, premarital sex, contraception, feminism, and a host of other sins portrayed as desirable. Over this time, standards gradually sank regarding sexuality, violence, and profanity, and along the way people shrugged their shoulders.

Today, we find no shortage of  homosexual television characters. Beginning with the 2001-2002 television season, NBC featured seven homosexual characters on Providence, ER, Friends, and Will and Grace. The latter show centers on a heterosexual woman and her sodomite best friend, Will. An actor on Will and Grace, Eric McCormack, revealed the show's mission: "When old ladies out there say, 'Oh, I hope he meets a nice man,' that's when we'll know the show has succeeded."

ABC featured two sodomite characters on Spin City and NYPD Blue. CBS included two sodomite characters on The Ellen Show and The Education of Max Bickford. The latter show also featured the first transgendered character.

While premium cable networks operate with greater content freedom, Showtime broke new ground with the demonic show Queer as Folk, featuring many sodomite characters and graphic perverted sex.

Here is a list of 39 (yes thirty-nine) "LGBTQIA+" shows: See: mashable.com/article/best-lgbtq-tv-shows. 

In the movies we see "positive gay characters" more and more after 1989. Here is just a partial list:

• Paris Is Burning (1991)
• Late Bloomers (1996)
• But I'm a Cheerleader (1999)
• Brokeback Mountain (2005)
• Jennifer's Body (2009)
• Pariah (2011)
• The Way He Looks (2014)
• Tangerine (2015)

Superheroes are portrayed in film as "gay" such as LEGO Batman, and Power Rangers (2017).

In pop music:

• Degenerate pop singer Katy Perry had a hit song in 2008 entitled I Kissed A Girl, about a lesbian encounter. It is sickening beyond description to see the parents of young girls (aged 10-15) at Perry's concerts singing along to that perverted garbage with their kids; I have to wonder about their fitness as parents

• The equally degenerate pop star Lady Gaga has two songs dedicated to sodomites; Alejandro (2010), and Born This Way (2011)

• Arguably the most popular singer in the world today, Taylor Swift, is an "ally" of perverts. In the music video for You Need to Calm Down, Swift features nearly a whole parade of  sodomites and homo-activists. She even wears a wig with the same colors as the bisexual flag. Spin magazine quotes her as saying, "Rights are being stripped from basically everyone who isn’t a straight white cisgender male." Yeah. Right. Sure. 

Reality Check:

So, is being homosexual "no big deal"?  It's OK because we must "live and let live"? Homosexuals and transgenders "aren't hurting anyone"? Until 1973, when political pressure changed it, homosexuality was considered a mental disorder by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. It was considered a mental disorder with good reason.

Homosexuality and Psychotic Violence

The top six American male serial killers were all homosexual:

• Donald Harvey claimed 37 victims in Kentucky
• John Wayne Gacy raped and killed 33 boys in Chicago, burying them under his house and in his yard
• Patrick Kearney accounted for 32, cutting his victims into small pieces after sex and leaving them in trash bags along the Los Angeles freeways
• Bruce Davis molested and killed 27 young men and boys in Illinois
• A gay sex-murder-torture ring (Corll-Henley-Brooks) sent 27 Texas men and boys to their grave; and Juan Corona was convicted of murdering 25 migrant workers (he had sex with their corpses--"necrophilia").

The pathology of eating one’s sexual victims also characterized Milwaukee’s Jeffrey Dahmer in 1992. He not only killed 17 young men and boys, but cooked and ate their body parts. The association between serial murder and homosexuality isn’t recent. Two gays compete for the spot of “world’s worst murderer.” During the Nazi reign of terror, Auschwitz executioner Ludwig Tiene strangled, crushed, and gnawed boys and young men to death while he raped them. Though his grand total is uncertain, he often murdered as many as 100 a day. Gilles de Rais (Bluebeard) brutally destroyed the lives of 800 boys. Each lad was lured to his home, bathed and fed. Just as the poor boy thought "this is my lucky day," he was raped, then killed by being ripped or cut apart and either burned or eaten. Even if the "10% of the population" is homosexual/bisexual were true, murder is disproportionately high among sodomites. 

A study of 518 sexually-tinged mass murders in the U.S. from 1966 to 1983 determined that 350 (68%) of the victims were killed by those who practiced homosexuality and that 19 (44%) of the 43 murderers were bisexuals or homosexuals (See Cameron, Dr. Paul,  [1983] "Is homosexuality disproportionately associated with murder?" Paper presented at Midwestern Psychological Assn Chicago.)

 Lesbian Aileen Wuornos laid claim in 1992 to "worst female killer" with at least 7 middle-aged male victims. She single-handedly topped the lesbian nurse team of Catherine Wood and Gwen Graham, who had killed 6 convalescent patients in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Jim Warren, who worked as a counselor at the Washington State Corrections Center, did the intake interview for almost all the younger murderers (i.e., under age 36) in the state of Washington from 1971-82 (during the growth of the so-called "gay rights movement"). He was "probably the only one who examined the entirety of each of their case files." Warren testified that he was struck with how frequently homosexuality turned up in the cases (See Warren, J,  [1989] Testimony before the Law and Justice Committee of the Washington State Senate December 15).

The data supports that most violence comes from within the sodomite lifestyle and gets exported. It does not come mostly from the outside against them. Homosexuals are a danger to society, not the other way around. The FBI reported 431 hate crimes against homosexuals for the U.S. in all of 1991. Only one was "confirmed" for Washington, D.C. — yet D.C. "gay" activists claimed 397 incidents! When pressed, they admitted that at least 366 of these "crimes" consisted of "verbal harassment." (See Washington Blade (1993) "FBI releases stats on hate crimes." January 1, pg.1). 

Objection: These are "outliers." Sure, some homosexuals are evil. Can't we say this of every group of individuals?

Objection Overruled

First, the number of homosexuals being violent is disproportionately high. There's good and bad in all people, but those who act upon homosexual desires make violence prevalent among sodomites and not a rarity that can be ascribed to "outliers." Second, most people don't realize that what sodomites do in private. Here are the facts below. Ask yourself, "Would anyone who is not seriously disturbed do these things?"

Homosexual Practices:

• Anal sex (sodomy properly so-called) is practiced by 80% of homosexuals. Tearing or bruising of the anal wall is common, and opens the body to reception of germs through the rectum.  According to J.R. Daling, et. al, "Correlates of Homosexual Behavior and the Incidence of Anal Cancer," Journal of the American Medical Association 247, no. 14 (April 9, 1982) the risk of anal cancer soars by 4000% among those who engage in anal intercourse. Anal sex also raises the risk of rectal prolapse, perforation that can go septic, chlamydia, cryptosporidiosis, genital herpes, gonorrhea, viral hepatitis B and C, as well as syphilis

• Rimming is the practice of licking and stimulating the anus of another. The amount of fecal matter consumed, and exposure to disease is significant over time 

• Golden showers is the practice of urinating on the other person. About 20% of sodomites regularly drink and bathe in their partner's urine

• Fisting is the practice of inserting the hand (and sometimes the arm up to the elbow, or further) into the partner's rectum. Many sodomites have the sphincter muscles so weakened they soil themselves. (See Darling cited above)

• Scat Sports involves ingesting your partner's feces and/or rubbing it all over the face and body

• Toys is the term used for inserting objects into the rectum. Most commonly used are gerbils, placed in plastic and inserted in the rectum until the animal suffocates and dies. The thrashing of the poor creature gives the sodomite his perverse pleasure. 

Normal behavior? Not prone to hurt others (or themselves)? Think again.

Step 2:

PORTRAY GAYS AS VICTIMS, NOT AS AGGRESSIVE CHALLENGERS

A media campaign to promote the Gay Victim image should make use of symbols which reduce the mainstream's sense of threat, which lower it's guard, and which enhance the plausibility of victimization. In practical terms, this means that jaunty mustachioed musclemen would keep very low profile in gay commercials and other public presentations, while sympathetic figures of nice young people, old people, and attractive women would be featured. (It almost goes without saying that groups on the farthest margin of acceptability such as NAMBLA, ("North American Man-Boy Love Association") must play no part at all in such a campaign: suspected child-molesters will never look like victims.)

Now, there are two different messages about the Gay Victim that are worth communicating. First, the mainstream should be told that gays are victims of fate, in the sense that most never had a choice to accept or reject their sexual preference. The message must read: "As far as gays can tell, they were born gay, just as you were born heterosexual or white or black or bright or athletic. Nobody ever tricked or seduced them; they never made a choice, and are not morally blameworthy. What they do isn't willfully contrary - it's only natural for them. This twist of fate could as easily have happened to you!"(Emphasis mine). 

How it worked:

One of the most stark examples came after the death of Matthew Shepard. Homo-activists and sympathetic media exploited (and continue to exploit) this terrible incident, attempting to create a victimization mentality around homosexuality. Television and print media covered the story far longer than the normal news cycle, and the made-for-TV movie, The Matthew Shepard Story, created a spirit of martyrdom.

Yet, when homosexuals aggressively victimize someone else, the story goes unreported. Take, for instance, the case of young Jesse Dirkhising, who was brutally raped and murdered by two homosexuals. Matthew Shepard's case was no more brutal than this young boy's, but Jesse went unacknowledged by gay activists, civil rights groups, and the mainstream media. (See americansfortruth.com/issues/jesse-dirkhising). 

Reality Check: Homosexuals are overwhelmingly more predatory than victims.

Homosexuality and Child Molestation:

• Over 90% of child molesters are male

• 25-40% of molestations are same-sex, far in excess of the percentage of homosexuals

• 43% of sex between teachers and pupils is homosexual

• 50% of sex between foster parents and foster children is homosexual

• In a study of 21 "group home" sex scandals — 71% were homosexual

• Of those who commit incest: Homosexual parents — 18%; Heterosexual parents — 0.6%

(See Freund K, Watson RJ (1992) "The proportions of heterosexual and homosexual pedophiles among sex offenders against children: an exploratory study." Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 18:34-43). 

Are Homosexuals "Born That Way"? The Myth of the "Gay Gene"

There is no "Gay Gene:"

1. Correlation is not causation. In the morning if you hear a rooster crow in the countryside, it means the sun will rise. Only the ignorant and superstitious would believe that the crowing of the rooster caused the sun to rise. One action (crowing) came before the other (sun rising) on multiple occasions, but that is mere correlation.  Some genetic and biological factors correlate with a higher incidence of homosexuality among select populations. However, there are no genetic or biological factors that have been shown to cause homosexuality. There is a long and extensive body of research that shows a strong and consistent correlation between smoking and various diseases, such as lung cancer. The correlation is so strong, you could reasonably say smoking cigarettes causes a great risk of developing lung cancer. No factor(s) have been linked anywhere near to the necessary degree needed to make the same claim about causation and homosexuality. (See scientificamerican.com/article/massive-study-finds-no-single-genetic-cause-of-same-sex-sexual-behavior/). 

There may be factors that cause a predisposition to homosexuality, but that doesn't make it a desirable trait. There is some evidence that there is a predisposition to alcoholism. Does being a lush and driving drunk suddenly become morally acceptable? Theologically, since the Fall, humanity is in an imperfect state and we are at war with our three enemies--the world, the flesh, and the devil. Even normal desires become wrong and must be resisted and altogether avoided, such as adultery and heterosexual promiscuity. That there are bad predispositions is not at all surprising from a theological viewpoint. 

2. The "Gay Gene" is a myth. 

Contrary to what sodomites would like you to think, scientific research has yet to find a so-called "gay gene." There is no region of the human genome that conclusively links homosexuality to any specific gene sequence. Claims by researchers that Xq28 is an "area of interest" in the genetic make-up of homosexual males has never been successfully verified. To date, there is no area of the DNA even remotely associated to lesbianism, and that surely weakens the "gay gene theory" even more. 

Studies of twins indicate a genetic contributing factor correlating to a higher occurrence of homosexuality. However, the earlier twin studies which claimed a much stronger correspondence for homosexuality among twins has now been refuted. Among homosexuals with an identical twin, in only approximately 20% of cases was their twin also homosexual. If homosexuality was a genetically predetermined trait, then the correspondence would be 100% and prove causation.  (See Cheryl L. Weill, Nature's Choice: What Science Reveals about the Biological Origins of Sexual Orientation NY:Routledge [2009], pgs. 65-68). 

3. "Prenatal Hormone Theory" proves nothing. 

There is not one iota of evidence, as of this writing, that when an unborn child is exposed to hormones in the womb atypical for their gender the male brain is "feminized" and the female brain is made "masculine." A careful study of children with Disorders of Sexual Development shows this theory lacks verification. The idea of homosexual brains differing from heterosexual brains finds its genesis in overstated assertions about the differences between male and female brains. (See e.g., Weill cited above). 

Step 3:

GIVE PROTECTORS A JUST CAUSE

A media campaign that casts gays as society's victims and encourages straights to be their protectors must make it easier for those to respond to assert and explain their new protectiveness...It is especially important for the gay movement to hitch its cause to accepted standards of law and justice because its straight supporters must have at hand a cogent reply to the moral arguments of its enemies. The homophobes clothe their emotional revulsion in the daunting robes of religious dogma, so defenders of gay rights must be ready to counter dogma with principle. (Emphasis mine). 

How it worked:

With the Masonic principle of "Separation of Church and State," there was an appeal to "the rights of Man." The infiltration into society by sodomites and their acceptance has lead to full "celebration." Even false sects, like Protestantism, denounced perversion in the not too distant past. The lunacy is apparent. Take the slogan "love is love;"--- no, it is not. I remember a satirical cartoon, in which a woman was about to kiss a cow, and the caption read: "Love is love." Even the ancient, pagan Greeks understood three kinds of love; eros (romantic love), philia (love of relatives and friends), and agape (love that directed to God and to others for the love of God. As Christ said, "Greater love than this no man hath, that a man lay down his life for his friends." (St. John 15:13). 

I love my wife, I loved my parents, I love my best friend, and I love God. The love I have for each is both felt and expressed very differently. If you apply romantic love to your parents, it's not "love is love," it's called "incest" and is morally wrong and mentally sick. Applied to animals, romantic love is beastiality. Applied to children it's pedophilia (which the clergy of the Vatican II sect know all too well--both those in and out of jail). Applied to persons of the same sex, it's homosexuality; which is just as morally depraved, unnatural, sinful, and sick as the other perversions. An immediate objection I hear is, "If homosexuality is a mental illness, then it can't be sinful." 

While it's true that "Whoever has not the use of reason does not sin formally by transgressing the moral law because of ignorance..." (See theologian Jone, Moral Theology, [1961], pg. 20), the person who is not habitually insane is morally responsible for those acts done while in possession of reason. Hence, a person who is a kleptomaniac has a mental illness to steal. Knowing that stealing is wrong, they have a moral obligation to seek professional help and do all they can to stop themselves. Failure to do so, or "celebrating thieves pride" would constitute grave sin. The Vatican II sect encourages this "sin of pride" among sexual perverts. 

Reality Check:

By "protecting" perverts, we endanger society's children, who are being actively recruited by sodomites. 

• Pro-sodomite books such as Daddy's Roommate, and Heather has Two Mommies are part of many curricula and attempt to portray unnatural relationships as "normal"

• The pro-sodomite/pro-transgender curricula in  The Safe Space Kit advises that, during casual conversations and classroom time, one should “make sure the language you are using is inclusive of all people. When referring to people in general, try using words like ‘partner’ instead of ‘boyfriend/girlfriend’ or ‘husband/wife’, and avoid gendered pronouns, using ‘they’ instead of ‘he/she’. What’s wrong with referring to a man as “he” and to a woman as “she”? Well, the glossary helps us to understand the definition of gender as “a social construct based on a group of emotional, behavioral and cultural characteristics attached to a person’s assigned biological sex” (See catholicexchange.com/the-new-school-homosexual-propaganda-and-your-kids)

The sodomites themselves know that they can pervert others to their sinful and depraved "lifestyle." In 1987, "gay activist" Michael Swift had this to say:

We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress,… Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.… The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence —will be abolished.… Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory.… All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only gods are handsome young men.… We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions.… Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks. (See Gay Community News, Feb. 15–21, 1987; Emphasis mine). 

Step 4:

MAKE GAYS LOOK GOOD

In order to make a Gay Victim sympathetic to straights you have to portray him as Everyman. But an additional theme of the campaign should be more aggressive and upbeat: to offset the increasingly bad press that these times have brought to homosexual men and women, the campaign should paint gays as superior pillars of society. Yes, yes, we know--this trick is so old it creaks. Other minorities use it all the time in ads that announce proudly, "Did you know that this Great Man (or Woman) was _________?" But the message is vital for all those straights who still picture gays as "queer" people-- shadowy, lonesome, fail, drunken, suicidal, child-snatching misfits. (Emphasis mine). 

How it worked:

Homosexuals are portrayed in the light most favorable to them in all facets of society. Even laws favor them. Transgender madness is a "civil right."

Reality Check:

Are "Gays" really "Good"? 

Besides the violence, mentally ill behaviors, and child molestations being disproportionately high, they also spread diseases and are a danger to themselves thereby burdening the healthcare system.

Even the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association (GLMA) has noted these problems. For example, among men who identify as homosexual:

• Problems with body image are more common among gay men, and gay men are much more likely to experience an eating disorder such as bulimia or anorexia nervosa.

• Gay men use substances at a higher rate than the general population, and not just in larger cities. These include a number of substances ranging from amyl nitrate ("poppers"), to marijuana, Ecstasy, and amphetamines.

• Depression and anxiety appear to affect gay men at a higher rate than in the general population. . . Adolescents and young adults may be at particularly high risk of suicide . . .

• Gay men use tobacco at much higher rates than straight men, reaching nearly 50 percent in several studies.

(See Robert J. Winn, “Ten Things Gay Men Should discuss with Their Healthcare Provider,” GLMA, May 2012). 

The federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration has reported the following distressing facts concerning women who identify themselves as practicing lesbians:

• Among adults, a study that examined the risk of psychiatric disorders among individuals with same-sex partners found that, during the previous 12 months, women with same-sex partners experienced more mental health disorders—such as major depression, phobia, and post-traumatic stress disorder—than did women with opposite sex partners

• Another study “found that lesbian and bisexual women who were ‘out’ experienced more emotional stress as teenagers and were 2 to 2.5 times more likely to experience suicidal ideation in the past 12 months than heterosexual women. Meanwhile, lesbian and bisexual women who were not ‘out’ were more likely to have attempted suicide than heterosexual women.”

• “Studies have found that lesbians are between 1.5 and 2 times more likely to smoke than heterosexual women.”

• “A number of studies have also suggested that lesbians are significantly more likely to drink heavily than heterosexual women.”

(See Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Top Health Issues for LGBT Populations Information & Resource Kit. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 12-4684. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2012, C1-2). 

Homosexuality and promiscuity:

• 28% of homosexual men had more than 1000 partners:  "Bell and Weinberg reported evidence of widespread sexual compulsion among homosexual men. 83% of the homosexual men surveyed estimated they had had sex with 50 or more partners in their lifetime, 43% estimated they had sex with 500 or more partners; 28% with 1,000 or more partners. Bell and Weinberg p 308." 

(See exodusglobalalliance.org/ishomosexualityhealthyp60.php)

• 79% of homosexual men say over half of sex partners are strangers: "The survey showed 79% of the respondents saying that over half of their sexual partners were strangers. Seventy percent said that over half of their sexual partners were people with whom they had sex only once. Bell and Weinberg pp.308-309."  

(See exodusglobalalliance.org/ishomosexualityhealthyp60.php)

• Modal range for homosexual sex partners 101-500: "In their study of the sexual profiles of 2,583 older homosexuals published in Journal of Sex Research, Paul Van de Ven et al. found that "the modal range for number of sexual partners ever [of homosexuals] was 101–500." In addition, 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent had between 501 and 1000 partners. A further 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent reported having had more than 1000 lifetime sexual partners. Paul Van de Ven et al., "A Comparative Demographic and Sexual Profile of Older Homosexually Active Men," Journal of Sex Research 34 (1997): 354."  

(See exodusglobalalliance.org/ishomosexualityhealthyp60.php)

Homosexuality and the Mortality Rate:

A study was conducted in Vancouver British Columbia and published in 1997 in the International Journal of Epidemiology (Vol. 26, 657-61: http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/26/3/657).

 Pro-sodomite researchers actually tried to debunk the assertion that homosexuality is infested with disease and shortens the life expectancy of both male sodomites and lesbians. Despite their attempts to downplay the practical consequences of their research, it is difficult to ignore that the study concluded with the statement that "under even the most liberal assumptions, gay and bisexual men in this urban centre [Vancouver, BC] are now experiencing a life expectancy similar to that experienced by all men in Canada in the year 1871." Much to their chagrin, the study revealed "life expectancy at age 20 years for gay and bisexual men is 8 to 20 years less than for all men." 

Transgenderism is Child Abuse:

We are told that children who "come out" to their parents as a "boy trapped in a girl's body" (or vice-versa) are brave  kids, and should be affirmed as the "gender with which they identify." Parents should allow them to change their name, clothes, and get surgery to mutilate their bodies. Those parents who abuse their children are "heroes," while parents who want them to get real help to fight gender dysphoria are portrayed as "bigots," and even (ironically) "tyrannical child abusers." The FACTS tell tell us who the real "good guys" are--and it's not those who get "gender-affirming care" for their confused children.

 

The American College of Pediatricians issued an incredibly brave statement in 2017. Daring to oppose the new pagans and the PC crowd, they stated the following salient points:

• The American College of Pediatricians urges healthcare professionals, educators and legislators to reject all policies that condition children to accept as normal a life of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex. Facts – not ideology – determine reality.

• Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of male and female, respectively – not genetic markers of a disorder.

• No one is born with a gender. Everyone is born with a biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or female) is a sociological and psychological concept; not an objective biological one.

• A person’s belief that he or she is something they are not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking. Gender Dysphoria (GD), formerly listed as Gender Identity Disorder (GID), is a recognized mental disorder in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-5). The psycho-dynamic and social learning theories of GD/GID have never been disproved.

•  Puberty is not a disease and puberty-blocking hormones can be dangerous.

•  According to the DSM-5, as many as 98% of gender confused boys and 88% of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty.

• Rates of suicide are nearly twenty times greater among adults who use cross-sex hormones and undergo sex reassignment surgery, even in Sweden which is among the most LGBTQ – affirming countries.

• Conditioning children into believing a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse. Endorsing gender discordance as normal via public education and legal policies will confuse children and parents, leading more children to present to “gender clinics” where they will be given puberty-blocking drugs. This, in turn, virtually ensures they will “choose” a lifetime of carcinogenic and otherwise toxic cross-sex hormones, and likely consider unnecessary surgical mutilation of their healthy body parts as young adults.

(signed) Dr. Michelle A. Cretella, M.D.

President of the American College of Pediatricians

Dr. Cretella has since been subjected to endless criticism, ostracization, and bullying-tactics. This brave doctor continues to speak the truth. She no longer holds her position as President of the American College of Pediatricians. As she herself stated in 2016, "...professionals who dare to question the unscientific party line of supporting gender transition therapy will find themselves maligned and out of a job." (See dailysignal.com/2017/07/03/im-pediatrician-transgender-ideology-infiltrated-field-produced-large-scale-child-abuse). 

Step 5: 

MAKE THE VICTIMIZERS LOOK BAD

At a later stage of the media campaign for gay rights-long after other gay ads have become commonplace-it will be time to get tough with remaining opponents. To be blunt, they must be vilified. (This will be all the more necessary because, by that time, the entrenched enemy will have quadrupled its output of vitriol and disinformation.) Our goal is here is twofold. First, we seek to replace the mainstream's self-righteous pride about its homophobia with shame and guilt. Second, we intend to make the antigays look so nasty that average Americans will want to dissociate themselves from such types.

The public should be shown images of ranting homophobes whose secondary traits and beliefs disgust middle America. These images might include: the Ku Klux Klan demanding that gays be burned alive or castrated; bigoted southern ministers drooling with hysterical hatred to a degree that looks both comical and deranged; menacing punks, thugs, and convicts speaking coolly about the "fags" they have killed or would like to kill; a tour of Nazi concentration camps where homosexuals were tortured and gassed. (Emphasis mine). 

How it worked:

By the logic of Kirk and Madsen, bigotry, hate, and phobia are the only possible motives for opposing "LGBTQIA++" beliefs and demands. Such vilification is not only a bullying tactic to stigmatize and silence detractors; it also happens to be false. You are "homophobic" and "transphobic"--i.e., YOU have a mental disorder if you disagree with their morally degenerate lifestyle. WOKE cancel culture will try to destroy you. Consider the occultist J.K. Rowling, author of the Harry Potter franchise. When she had the courage to mock the "inclusive" language of the transgender madness (even a broken clock is right twice every 24 hours) she was removed from the Museum of Pop Culture for "transphobic remarks."

Reality Check:

Homosexuality is a moral disorder leading to mental, physical, and spiritual destruction. Transgenderism is a mental illness to be cured, not a reality to be celebrated. We are not evil for wanting them converted and cured by speaking the truth. Those who stand up for God and truth are not evil, and sodomites are not poor victims who are "born that way."

Perhaps, worst of all, "born this way" advocates will take away all impetus to do good. After all, if our behaviors are genetically determined, not only are bad acts acceptable, but a life of virtue, such as that lived by St. Francis of Assisi, can be equally dismissed because he was "born that way." Virtue, like sin, is a matter of choice. Sodomites seek acceptance so as to better destroy what's left of the family and the members of the One True Church. 

Turning the Tide

Without reference to God's Law (or even Natural Law), the homosexual lifestyle has been shown by empirical evidence to be unhealthy physically and emotionally. Homosexuals are disproportionately violent, child molesters, disease-ridden with shortened life spans, and counterproductive to society. Furthermore, they want your children to join in their wicked ways. Those who oppose them are "homophobic" (implying a mental disorder for being moral and/or Christian) and are subjected to harassment, social ostracism, loss of job, and discrimination charges. Here is my proposed antidote to Kirk and Madsen: How America Will Conquer Its Acceptance of Immoral Perverts:

First, do not use their "preferred pronouns" or terminology. Never say "gay, " "queer, " or any appellation other than sodomite--it refers to their sick behavior and reminds them of how God destroyed Sodom for the sin named after it. For transgenders, use the name but not the pronoun. It is a violation of your First Amendment right to the Free Exercise of Religion to demand you affirm a lie; that a person of one gender can be another or "gender-fluid." Frame it as a violation of YOUR rights. YOU are the victim because of your religious beliefs. Tell anyone who opposes you they are bigoted and "Christophobic." 

Second, refuse to "celebrate" so-called "gay pride" and boycott any business that does--and let them know it.

Third, we need a Constitutional amendment declaring marriage to be a union of one man and one woman, and declaring homosexual conduct as criminal conduct that may be proscribed by law. (This would overturn all U. S. Supreme Court decisions to the contrary, beginning in 2003). 

Fourth, after the amendment, criminalize homosexual acts by statute as it used to be. Define and proscribe all homosexual activity. 

As in Uganda (which criminalizes homosexuality), there should be two classes of criminal acts, both felonies; "the offence of homosexuality" and "the offense of  aggravated homosexuality."  "Aggravated homosexuality" is defined to include a homosexual act committed (1) with a person under the age of 18 by a person over the age of 18; (2) committed by a person who is HIV-positive; (3) committed by a parent or guardian of the person with whom the act is committed; (4) committed by a person in authority over the person with whom the act is committed; (5) committed with a disabled person;(6) committed by a serial offender; or (7) committed by a person who administers any drug, matter, or thing with the intent to stupefy or overpower another person to enable a same-sex act to be committed. A person charged with "aggravated homosexuality" is forced to undergo an HIV test and if convicted will be imprisoned for life without possibility of parole, or executed, depending on the circumstances to be decided by the jury. 

All other homosexual acts constitute "the offense of homosexuality," and if convicted will bring a mandatory seven years in prison. The APA will once more recognize homosexuality as a personality disorder, and conversion therapy will not only be permitted, but mandated for those who profess same sex attraction.

Lastly, all public promotion of homosexuality by a corporation or educational institution shall be subjected to large fines. Sound draconian? Not if you realize the very foundation of our civilization is at stake. The Vatican II sect aids and abets the sodomite agenda. Of course, the ultimate answer is the restoration of the Church and Catholic countries as existed prior to Vatican II. While we pray and try to convert others, we must use whatever secular means we have at our disposal to sway public opinion and elect anti-sodomite, pro-family politicians. I'm not overstating the case when I tell people that one of the greatest threats to the human race--mentally, physically, and spiritually---is the acceptance and active support of LGBTQIAA+ sexual perversion. That and the Occult Explosion are the greatest threats humanity now faces.

Conclusion

 The agenda of Kirk and Madsen worked. It continues to work for transgender madness. A look at the facts shows that LGBTQIAA+ people have serious mental health issues as well as moral problems that go against both nature and God. To oppose sodomites and attempt to get them both mental and spiritual help is what they desperately need. The lavender lobby is going beyond the usual hackneyed argument "you can't impose your religious beliefs on others." Instead, they are beginning to attack religious teachings about homosexuality, arguing that such doctrine “harms the LGBTQIA+ community” and people who believe that sexual perversion is immoral, unnatural, and a mental illness are themselves mentally ill as well as hateful bigots that need to be banned from public discourse.

The Vatican II sect is part of the problem. "Fr" James Martin said in 2017, at Fordham University, "I have a hard time imagining how even the most traditionalist, homophobic, closed-minded Catholic cannot look at my friend [in a same-sex "marriage"] and say, ‘That is a loving act, and that is a form of love that I don’t understand but that I have to reverence." (See news.fordham.edu/inside-fordham-category/lectures-and-events/building-bridge-catholic-church-lgbt-community/).   

According to the book The Changing Face of the Priesthood by Vatican II sect "priest" Donald  Cozzens (published by The Liturgical Press in the year 2000), sociologist James G. Wolf's research concludes 48.5% of priests and 55.1% of seminarians were homosexuals. The percentage is highest among "priests" under age 40, which in Wolf's research (published in 1989), would mean those born in and after 1950, with "ordinations" taking place in/after 1974 after the Modernists opened the floodgates to admit sodomites. Cozzens reports the number of sexually active homosexuals in the Vatican II "priesthood" was a full-fledged "network" of perverts. This is all the more alarming, as Cozzens is sympathetic to the sodomites.

We must stand up and be prepared for persecution. God has this to say of sodomites and their supporters:

Wherefore God gave them up to the desires of their heart, unto uncleanness, to dishonor their own bodies among themselves. Who changed the truth of God into a lie; and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error. And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers, detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy. Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them. (Romans 1:24-32; Emphasis mine).