Monday, June 17, 2019

Somewhere Under The Rainbow


 Traditionalists celebrate the month of June by dedicating it to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus. Secular society now "celebrates" sexual perversion and mental illness by making June "Gay Pride Month." Every time I see the rainbow flag, I'm reminded of how we are living in a time of oppression, in some ways similar to those in Europe who lived for a time under the Swastika. We must accept that homosexuality is just as normal as heterosexuality. So too is "transgenderism," bisexuality, and every other aberration deemed "normal." In fact, it is so "normal" that any suggestion to the contrary must be suppressed, ridiculed, attacked, and eventually made subject to civil fines and imprisonment as a "hate crime." This is the result of the forces of evil in society.

In the days before the Great Apostasy, the Roman Catholic Church stood as a bulwark against perversion. Then the infiltration began. Bella Dodd told of thousands of Communists that were placed in seminaries to subvert the Church beginning in the first half of the twentieth century. A friend of mine asked me, "Don't you think that exposure to the True Faith in the seminary would have converted at least some of them and they would have 'blown the whistle'"? Based on several reasons (which I will not elaborate upon in this post), I believe that the infiltrators were not rank and file ideological Communists. They sent in men who were known to be sodomites. They would get to associate with men and (at that time) have easy access to boys, all the while using the prestige of the priesthood to deflect any accusations of impropriety. In rebellion against both God and nature itself, sodomites are most hateful towards God, and least likely to be moved by grace.

The plot worked. With the last obstacle removed in 1958 (the papacy, by the "election" of Roncalli), the perverts came out in full force. The Vatican II sect is run by sexual deviants, and since 2002, the scandals keep growing. As a young teenager, prior to my conversion to the True Church at age 16, I attended a Vatican II sect high school on a scholarship. One of the brothers (Society of Mary), told jokes to 14 year old boys and girls that were so vile, I can't write them in this post. I was shocked and scandalized. I repeated one of his filthy "jokes" to my father (God rest his soul), a former World War II U.S. Army Sergeant. His jaw nearly hit the ground and he was visibly uncomfortable. He knew that such jokes were sinful, and when told to teenage girls and boys, their malice was incalculable. "Are you going to complain about this Dad?" I asked him. After a long pause, he said, "Well, no, he is a brother..." Using the heightened respect accorded to clerics and religious, these fiends were able to get away with things no layman ever could.

Later in my freshman year, it was announced that the renowned priest, Fr. Bruce Ritter (ordained 1956), who had started Covenant House (an organization dedicated to helping runaway and homeless youths in New York City), would be coming to give a talk to the Freshman Class. As we were waiting for him to arrive for the talk, I needed to go to the bathroom. On my way out of the door I (literally) bumped into Fr. Ritter, who was hailed as a "model Franciscan and priest." I looked up into his eyes, and a shiver ran up and down my spine. I can't explain it, but I knew I had just looked at someone who was pure evil. He must have seen my expression, because he grimaced at me, said nothing, and went to give his talk. After going to the bathroom, and trying to calm myself down, I returned to where he was speaking.

When I told some of my friends what I experienced, they laughed it off. My parents were incredulous; just "a meaningless reaction." In 1990, Ritter was forced to resign from Covenant House and the Franciscan Order after several young men had reported that he had engaged in sexual relations with them as young boys in the care of the charity, and that he had embezzled funds. He was never charged with a crime despite all the accusations, and got himself incardinated into a Diocese in India, continuing to function as a Vatican II sect priest in upstate New York until his death in 1999--- three years before the widespread abuse scandal began to be reporte. I had a glimpse into the sodomite/pervert infestation--and I believe that for some reason, God let me know this priest was bad news.

The Vatican II sect is now doing the exact opposite of the True Church; defending sodomites and denying the indisputable connection between homosexuality and pedophilia. This is especially true in the wake of the study underwritten by the Vatican II sect "bishops" in the United States and performed by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City. The report is entitled The Nature and Scope of the Problem of Sexual Abuse of Minors by Catholic Priests and Deacons in the United States, commonly known as the John Jay Report. It was published in 2004, and is available online (See http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/child-and-youth-protection/upload/the-nature-and-scope-of-sexual-abuse-of-minors-by-catholic-priests-and-deacons-in-the-united-states-1950-2002.pdf).

 Last October, the Jesuit-run heretical rag, America magazine, published an essay entitled No, Homosexuality is Not a Risk Factor for the Sexual Abuse of Children, authored by one Dr. Thomas Plante, a psychiatrist and residing scholar at Santa Clara University who is also an adjunct professor at the Stanford University School of Medicine. Plante and the Vatican II sect are trying even harder to normalize the sexual deviants and one of the Four Sins That Cry To Heaven For Vengeance. (See https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2018/10/22/no-homosexuality-not-risk-factor-sexual-abuse-children).


Plante vs. The Truth About Sodomites and Pedophilia

 In his error-laden tract, Plante makes several startling assertions:

  • banning homosexual men from the priesthood would not prevent victimization
  • it is a false belief that men with homosexual orientations cannot be trusted around male children and that their sexual impulse control is poor
  • that “sexual orientation is not a risk factor at all," for sexually abusing children
  • more boys are molested by V2 sect "priests" than girls because they are "more available"
What does the empirical evidence show? (Much of the section below is from research complied by Dr. Paul Cameron).

1. Sodomites have more overall serious problems than heterosexuals
According to a 2015 federal survey (See Medley G, Lipan RN, et al (2016) Sexual orientation and estimates of adult substance use and mental health: results from the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. SAMHSA Data Review, October), homosexuals have higher proportional rates of :

  • criminality, including sex offenses
  • illegal drug use
  • driving under the influence
Please note the higher incidence of sex offences, yet Plante would have us believe sexual orientation is "not at all" a risk factor for sex crimes.

2. Sodomite V2 Sect "Priests" are not predators due to a lack of females
 There are not only "altar boys" ("table servers" would be the more apt appellation in the Novus Bogus "mass") but just as many (and in some cases more) altar girls. Moreover, according to the John Jay Report, nearly 4% of U.S. Vatican II "priests" were documented to have molested at least one minor, and nearly 80% of the molestations by these so-called priests involved boys. Plante claims that "most of the clergy sex offenders during the last half of the 20th century… viewed themselves as more likely to be heterosexual than as homosexual."

I'm still shaking my head over the statement that these predators "viewed themselves" as more likely heterosexual than homosexual. Is this guy serious? I'm sure Stalin and Hitler didn't "view themselves" as mass murderers, but that's objectively what they were, and it is based on what they did.  A murderer is one who commits murder. Likewise, a homosexual is one who commits homosexual acts.

3. The disproportionate number of homosexual predator-"priests" is indicative that they cannot be trusted around male children, and banning them would drastically reduce the number of victims
Plante suggests between "22% to 45%" of U.S. "priests" are "gay." Let's take the low end of the range and assume 22%. Based on the John Jay Report 3.06% of the documented sex abusers engaged in homosexuality, that translates to an estimate of nearly 14% of homosexual priests being caught for sexual abuse of a minor. Given that less than one percent of priests were caught molesting girls (0.87%), barely 1% of the heterosexual priests (comprising 78% of the total) would have been caught. Unless heterosexual priest offenders are much better than homosexual priests at not getting caught, something that seems quite unlikely since it is known that boys are less apt than girls to report being molested (See Hall RC & Hall RCW (2007) A profile of pedophilia: definition, characteristics of offenders, recidivism, treatment outcomes, and forensic issues. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 82(4), 457–71), homosexuality is a very significant risk factor for child sexual abuse.

The Wisdom of the True Church
St. Bernadine of Sienna:
"No sin has greater power over the soul than the one of cursed sodomy, which was always detested by all those who lived according to God's law. ... "

St. Jerome
"And Sodom and Gomorrah might have appeased it [God’s wrath], had they been willing to repent, and through the aid of fasting gain for themselves tears of repentance." (See http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/30092.htm).

 St. Augustine
"Those offences which be contrary to nature are everywhere and at all times to be held in detestation and punished; such were those of the Sodomites, which should all nations commit, they should all be held guilty of the same crime by the divine law, which hath not so made men that they should in that way abuse one another. For even that fellowship which should be between God and us is violated, when that same nature of which He is author is polluted by the perversity of lust." (See http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/110103.htm).

Didache, A.D. 80 - 130 (Teaching of the Twelve Apostles)
"Commit no murder, adultery, sodomy, fornication, or theft."

Conclusion
There is an incontrovertible connection between sodomites and pedophilia. The secular pseudo-science of researchers with an agenda, using small samplings to reach predetermined outcomes, fuels societal acceptance of homosexuality. They ignore both the body of reputable research, and the disproportionate numbers of homosexual child molesters, which show the danger sodomites pose to society in general and children in particular. The Vatican II sect, having been infiltrated and driven by sodomites, leads innumerable souls to Hell. They join the world in trying to normalize perversion. If you should dare oppose the sodomite agenda, be prepared for persecution.

The Rainbow Flag is slowly but surely becoming the modern day Sickle and Hammer of oppression. Maybe we need a counter-manifesto against them: "Decent people of the World Unite--You Have EVERYTHING to lose if the sodomites are not stopped now."

34 comments:

  1. Introibo, thank you again for another fine article. God bless.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That these men abuse the respect, deference, and benefit-of-the-doubt we SHOULD give to priest, is especially evil.

    ReplyDelete
  3. When homosexuality and pedophilia is referred to the majority think of men. Women are perps as well and their pedophilia is neglected and underreported. Women who report abuse, molestation and rape by other women are mostly discounted as society has not accepted or acknowledged the devastation to women's lives by women pedophiles/homosexuals. Pedophilia is seen mostly as a male perversion. Often women perps are given suspended sentences by the Courts. However, if it was a male perp the sentencing would be much harsher.

    The below link is a recounting of a woman's molestation by a "Nun".
    https://nypost.com/2019/02/16/inside-the-horrifying-unspoken-world-of-sexually-abusive-nuns/

    "For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature". Romans 1:26

    JoAnn

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joann,
      You’re right on! Lesbians somehow get a “pass.” They SHOULD NOT!! Female homosexuals are every bit perverted as their male counterparts.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  4. The Rainbow Flag is also the symbol for Noahides.
    You should do an article on this blasphemous abominable group known as the Noahides.
    -Andrew
    P.S. Europa officially lived under the Hammer and Sickle for over 45 years and it destroyed over 1,000 years of Catholic culture.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Andrew,
      I’ll consider the Noahides. Your statement on Communism is on the mark!

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. Introibo and Andrew,

      Unfortunately before I found the Traditional Church, I was approached by Noahides and was so fed up with the New Mass and what was supposedly Christian that I seriously was considering joining the Noahides. Fortunately and by God's Grace, I found the True Traditional Church and left any thought of the Noahides behind.

      Today, especially, with the Novus Ordo mess and Frankie the Fake, people become desperate in searching for the truth and these groups such as Noahides are right there to lure people astray.

      Introibo, I personally think an article warning people of the Noahides is a very timely and good idea. Just my 2 cents.

      JoAnn

      Delete
    3. Joann,
      I will research and write such a post this summer!

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    4. Noahide
      http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2017/06/noachidae-or-sons-of-noah-first-name-of.html?m=1

      Delete
  5. Sodomy is truly a sin crying out for vengeance against Heaven. The rainbow was a sign that meant God would not flood the world again because of its wickedness. Now it's being used as a sign to flood the world with its wickedness. Devils are so clever to inspire people to use symbols to mock God.

    Lee

    Lee

    Lee

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry for wearing my name out. I don't know how it got typed three times, but oh well.

      Delete
    2. Lee,
      Yes, Satan seeks to twist things once used in a godly way to represent all that is ungodly. What a wicked world in which we live.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  6. Very timely article. I live in the most liberal part of America -- modern day Sodom and Gomorrah. I was indoctrinated into accepting homosexuality in middle school, although the brainwashing techniques were rudimentary at that time and became more deceptive and crafty by high school. Although people ridicule my area for being exceptionally liberal, the fact is that most of America has now accepted the same shallow arguments in favor of homosexuality. Most "conservatives" in Middle America now defend homosexuality as a civil right. Republican politicians champion the LGBT agenda; Donald Trump being a clear example with his promotion of homosexuality in Botswana on June 11th, 2019.

    When I converted to Catholicism, the last liberal idea I jettisoned was my support of homosexuality. I couldn't see why it was bad. Now I understand that the act frustrates the inherent end, the purpose, the "telos" of procreation. The very act of homosexuality is in itself a perversion of the human body, one that is a crime against the very notion of purpose in and of itself.

    Obviously, I now find myself in the extreme minority, especially during "Pride Month." But we must hold strong to the faith and sanctify our souls by following the commandments and living a life of prayer. God bless you Introibo and keep up the glorious intellectual crusade against vice and the forces of naturalism.

    -- Anon from California

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anonCalifornia,
      Thank you for the kind words and the great comment, my friend! I live in the Sodom of the East, i.e., New York.

      Great people like you give me hope that all is not lost, and people are still responding to God’s grace! We have quite a battle ahead.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  7. Why don't we hear hardly anything about HIV and Aids any more? Is it apart of the news media trying to normalize" the sodomite's perversion?

    JoAnn

    ReplyDelete
  8. The two most dangerous movements to emerge from the 1960's were the feminist and sodomite revolutions. Both were and still are spearheaded by jews. Including the late Betty Frieden who unleashed her hatred against Christian marriage and morals. As well as Democrat, Harvey Milk. The slain "hero" of the Democrat left who was a assassinaed by a fellow Democrat.

    To this day, the Democrat party has officially become the incubator for fostering sin and mainstreaming it as a noble cause. Which its most avowed champion, Barack Hussein Obama glorified. WThis racial parasite used the Oval Office to legislate on behalf of sodomites and sexual deviancy.

    Now we have a good majority of Americans who see nothing wrong with the so-called "LGBT" agenda and are even lending their support in enable these sexual perverts to destroy our children. Through their diabolical "transgender" indoctrination!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Renee,
      Isn’t it interesting that we are supposed to consider gender “fluid” and not objective. However, transgenderism MUST BE CONSIDERED OBJECTIVE AND UNALTERABLE. Hence, the government bans conversion therapy aimed at helping the person and punishes those who don’t subscribe to their wicked insanity.

      Thank you for commenting!

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  9. Personal story I went to Biship O'Dowd a novus ordo high school in the SF bay area, I graduated in 2005, which was somewhat before the sodomy movement really picked up steam. We had 5 priests one of whom made the claim that all religions are in fact the same religion. We had a very active LGBTQ club on campus, And had 4 or 5 lesbian teachers, one of which had a sex change operation. It didn't make sense to me at the time how a Catholic school could support such things that are so clearly condemned in the Bible. The funny thing was that this school was where all the rich parents in the area sent their kids, as if they were going to get some sort of great education.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ryan,
      All too often going to a particular school is simply a matter of status, tradition ("my parents went there"), or culture (i.e., "Cultural Catholics"). These schools are just for show. I know so many Vatican II sect parents who never set foot in a Church, but have the kids baptized, have huge parties for First Cracker ("Communion"), and so-called Confirmation. The Vatican II sect clergy have no problem giving them these "sacraments" with no family support or preparation. In their schools they get to indoctrinate them with all manner of heresy and evil, while the parents just go along without a care, much like modern day Jews who eat ham sandwiches. Neither cares about God, only going through the motions. They are de facto pagans, giving their children even lower values. They will have much for which they must account for one day. By God's grace, you saw your way out.

      Deo gratias!

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  10. My uncle was an active member of St. Charles Borromeo parish in Drexel Hill, PA. In the spring of 1961 he scheduled a number of prominent speakers to lecture the parish on the dangers of Communism...Bela Dodd was one of those speakers. I was selected to meet Mrs. Dodd and escort her to the parish hall. I arrived at her suite at the Benjamin Franklin Hotel about thirty minutes early at her request. She wanted to go over her prepared remarks with me before delivering her speech to the members of the parish. Not only did she tell me that she had recruited over eleven hundred "very progressive" young men (she denied that they were Communists) to enter Catholic seminaries, but claimed that "...we have Bishops and Cardinals under our control (she used the term "we" which I found chilling) and that "you will not recognize the Church after the Council" referring, of course, to Vatican II. Until your article, no one else has ever stated that these "progressive young men" were not members of the Communist Party. Have you come across some other documentation to support your contention? Up to now, I've been the only voice to the contrary...it's lonely out here!
    James

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. James,
      I've read several old articles about the infiltration, and certain words would pop up--"soft men" would enter the seminary. Those "most opposed to the Church." I got the idea after my friend asked me about Communist conversion, that this might not be Communism, but homosexuality. Those engaged in immoral, unnatural vice, are in open rebellion against God and least likely to be moved by grace. They are "soft" (effeminate) and most opposed to the Church that tells them where they will end up if they don't cease and repent.

      Your story is fascinating and seems to validate my belief.

      Many thanks and God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  11. What is the difference between High Mass and Low Mass, apart from the leonine prayers, the use of incense and the recitation of the Asperges Me?
    Where are they said?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You should check your Missal, they usually have good explanations in detail. To get to the point, this sums it up very briefly from one source:
      In a Sung Mass (High or Solemn), certain parts of the Mass must be sung, at least recto tono;
      otherwise, it would not be a Sung Mass. From the prayers at the foot of the altar to the Last
      Gospel, all hymns sung by the choir or faithful are to be in Latin. A vernacular hymn is allowed
      during the procession in and recession out, but during the Mass proper, Latin is the sole
      language.
      All other Masses during the day are normally Low Masses. Vernacular hymns are allowed during Low Mass.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. Thank you.
      God Bless,
      Long Life Christ the King and Our Lady of Guadalupe

      Delete
  12. I am beyond disgusted. Restaurants in my area are advertising "Drag Brunches". These are not typical LGBT restaurants but regular restaurants. I had never heard of "Drag Brunches", but they are popping up at restaurants all over the Country. This is abdominal. I am making a note of the restaurants that are hosting these "Drag Brunches" to make sure I never give them my business.

    "Drag Brunch is where drag kings and drag queens perform for an audience while the audience feasts on typical brunch foods and drinks. Although it is typically held at LGBTQ bars and nightclubs, restaurants have also become a popular site for drag brunches".

    https//beta.washingtonpost.com
    lifestyle/style/dcs-drag-brunches-have-booze-bottomless-bites-and-beyonce-here-are-our-favorites/2018/07/31/5afd6dec-8380-11e8-9e80-403a221946a7_storyhtml?outputType=amp

    JoAnn

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joann,
      Sick. Thanks for the information. Any business that promotes perversion should be boycotted--and let the owner know why.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  13. Introibo, I don't know if the below linked article sheds any light on the Communist/Homosexual infiltration of the Church, but came across it recently.

    https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/news-episcopal-sodomy-communist-homosexual-infiltrators

    Also, Baseball has become infested with LGBT's Pride Night. Where is the outage, where is the backlash?? "Evil prevails when good men do nothing".

    https://www.mlb.com/news/orioles-host-first-pride-night-c283217860

    JoAnn

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joann,
      Too many are doing nothing and evil is having a field day.
      Thank you for the information!

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  14. Replies
    1. Poni,
      Here is a concise yet accurate definition I found:
      http://www.rapidshift.net/what-is-distributism-distributionism-or-distributivism/

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  15. I plan reading Quadragesimo Anno and Rerum Novarum, to understand it better. It has been criticized by the TIA peoples which claim it is "socialist". But if it came from a Pope i don´t believe them.
    Thank you again;
    Long Life Christ the King and Our Lady of Guadalupe.

    ReplyDelete