Monday, April 14, 2025

The Holiness Of The Church And The Unholiness Of Speaking Against Our Neighbor

 

To My Readers: This week's post, by John Gregory, explains what it means when we say the One True Church is Holy. John also puts into perspective the Eighth Commandment of Almighty God. 

Feel free to comment as usual. If you have  a specific comment or question for me, I will respond as always, but it may take me a bit longer to do so this Holy Week. A Blessed Holy Week and Happy Easter to every one of you who reads my blog! 

God bless you all, my dear readers---Introibo

The Holiness Of The Church And The Unholiness Of Speaking Against Our Neighbor
By John Gregory

Fifth Sunday after Epiphany 

 

  1. Dogmatic Subject: The Holiness of the Church.Put ye on therefore, as the elect of God, holy, and beloved, the bowels of mercy (Colossians 3: 12).The kingdom of heaven is likened to a man that sowed good seed in his field (St. Matthew 13: 24) 

 

  1.  Moral Subject: The Eighth Commandment. Evilspeaking against Our Neighbor.Above all things have charity, which is the bond of perfection; and let the peace of Christ rejoice in your hearts, wherein also you are called in one body (Colossians 3: 14, 15).While men were asleep his enemy came and oversowed cockle among the wheat, and went his way (Matthew 13: 25).  (Catechism of Trent [COT])Page xlii  

 

“HOLY”

 

The second mark of the Church is holiness, as we learn from these words of the Prince of the Apostles: You are a chosen generation, a holy nation(1 Peter 2: 9) 

 

The Church is called holy because she is consecrated and dedicated to God; for so other things when set apart and dedicated to the worship of God were wont to be called holy, even though they were materialExamples of this in the Old Law were vessels, vestments and altarsIn the same sense the first-born who were dedicated to the Most High God were also called holy. Catechism of Trent (COT - p. 104) 

 

It should not be deemed a matter of surprise that the Church, although numbering among her children many sinners, is called holy. For as those who profess any art, even though they depart from its rules, are still called artists, so in like manner the faithful, although offending in many things and violating the engagements to which they had pledged themselves, are still called holy, because they have been made the people of God and have consecrated themselves to Christ by faith and Baptism.  Hence, Saint Paul calls the Corinthians sanctified and holy, although it is certain that among them there were some whom he severely rebuked as carnal, and also charged with grosser crimes. (1 Corinthians 1: 2; 3: 41) 

 

The Church is also to be called holy because she is united to her holy Head, as His body; that is, to Christ the Lord, (Ephesians 4: 15, 16) the fountain of all holiness, from whom flow the graces of the Holy Spirit and the riches of the divine bounty.  Saint Augustine, interpreting these words of the Prophet: Preserve my soul, for I am holy, (Psalm 85: 2) thus admirably expresses himself: Let the body of Christ boldly say, let also that one man, exclaiming from the ends of the earth, boldly say, with his Head, and under his Head, I am holy; for he received the grace of holiness, the grace of Baptism and of remission of sins.  And a little further on: If all Christians and all the faithful, having been baptized in Christ, have put Him on, according to these words of the Apostle: “As many of you as have been baptized in Christ, have put on Christ” (Galatians 3: 27); if they are made members of his body, and yet say they are not holy, they do an injury to their Head, whose members are holy. 

 

Moreover, the Church alone has the legitimate worship of sacrifice, and the salutary use of the Sacraments, which are the efficacious instruments of divine grace, used by God to produce true holiness.  Hence, to possess true holiness, we must belong to this ChurchThe Church therefore it is clear, is holy, and holy because she is the body of Christ, by whom she is sanctified, and in whose blood she is washed. 

 

THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT 

 

“Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor (Exodus 20: 16) 

 

IMPORTANCE OF INSTRUCTION ON THIS COMMANDMENT 

 

The great utility, nay the necessity, of carefully explaining this Commandment, and of emphasizing its obligation, we learn from these words of Saint James: If any man offend not in word, the same is a perfect man; and again, The tongue is indeed a little member, and boasteth great thingsBehold how small a fire, what a great wood it kindleth; (St. James 3: 2, 5) and so on, to the same effect. 

 

From these words we learn two truthsThe first is that sins of the tongue are very prevalent, which is confirmed by these words of the Prophet: Every man is a liar, (Psalm 115: 2) so that it would almost seem as if this were the only sin which extends to all mankindThe other truth is that the tongue is the source of innumerable evils Through the fault of the evil-speaker are often lost the property, the reputation, the life, and the salvation of the injured person, or of him who inflicts the injuryThe injured person, unable to bear patiently the contumely, avenges it without restraintThe offender, on the other hand, deterred by a perverse shame and a false idea of what is called honor, cannot be induced to make reparation to him whom he has offended.  

 

TWO PARTS OF THIS COMMANDMENT 

 

The first forbids us to bear false witnessThe other commands us to lay aside all dissimulation and deceit, and to measure our words and actions by the standard of truth, a duty of which the Apostle admonishes the Ephesians in these words: Doing the truth in charity, let us grow up in all things in him. (Ephesians 4: 15) 

 

Negative Part of this Commandment 

 

With regard to the prohibitory part of this Commandment, although by false testimony is understood whatever is positively but falsely affirmed of anyone, be it for or against him, be it in a public court or elsewhere; yet the Commandment specially prohibits that species of false testimony which is given on oath in a court of justice.  For a witness swears by the Deity, because the words of a man thus giving evidence and using the divine name have very great weight and possess the strongest claim to creditSuch testimony, therefore, because it is dangerous, is specially prohibited; for even the judge himself cannot reject the testimony of sworn witnesses, unless they be excluded by exceptions made in the law, or unless their dishonesty and malice are notoriousThis is especially true since it is commanded by divine authority that in the mouth of two or three every word shall stand. (Matthew 18: 16; Deuteronomy 19: 15) 

 

“AGAINST THY NEIGHBOUR” 

 

In order that the faithful may have a clear comprehension of this Commandment it should be explained who is our neighbor, against whom it is unlawful to bear false witnessAccording to the interpretation of Christ the Lord, our neighbor is he who needs our assistance, whether bound to us by ties of kindred or not, whether a fellow-citizen or a stranger, a friend or an enemyIt is wrong to think that one may give false evidence against an enemy, since by the command of God and of our Lord we are bound to love him. 

 

Moreover, as every man is bound to love himself, and is thus, in some sense, his own neighbor, it is unlawful for anyone to bear false witness against himselfHe who does so brands himself with infamy and disgrace, and injures both himself and the Church of which he is a member, much as the suicide, by his act, does a wrong to the stateThis is the doctrine of Saint Augustine, who says: To those who do not understand (the precept) properly, it might seem lawful to give false testimony against one's self, because the words “against thy neighbour” are subjoined in the CommandmentBut let no one who bears false testimony against himself think that he has not violated this Commandment, for the standard of loving our neighbour is the love which we cherish towards ourselves. 

 

FALSE TESTIMONY IN FAVOR OF A NEIGHBOR IS ALSO FORBIDDEN 

 

But if we are forbidden to injure our neighbor by false testimony, let it not be inferred that the contrary is lawful, and that we may help by perjury those who are bound to us by ties of kinship or religionIt is never allowed to have recourse to lies or deception, much less to perjuryHence Saint Augustine in his book to Crescentius On Lying teaches from the words of the Apostle that a lie, although uttered in false praise of anyone, is to be numbered among false testimoniesTreating of that passage, Yea, and we are found false witnesses of God, because we have given testimony against God, that he hath raised up Christ whom he hath not raised, if the dead rise not again, (1 Corinthians 15: 15) he says: The Apostle calls it false testimony to utter a lie with regard to Christ, even though it should seem to redound to His praise. 

 

It also not infrequently happens, that by favoring one party we injure the otherFalse testimony is certainly the occasion of misleading the judge, who, yielding to such evidence, is sometimes obliged to decide against justice, to the injury of the innocent. 

 

Sometimes, too, it happens that the successful party, who by means of perjured witnesses, has gained his case and escaped with impunity, exulting in his iniquitous victory, soon becomes accustomed to the work of corrupting and suborning false witnesses, by whose aid he hopes to obtain whatever he wishes. 

 

To the witness himself it must be most grievous that his falsehood and perjury are known to him whom he has aided and abetted by his perjury; whilst encouraged by the success that follows his crime, he becomes every day more accustomed to wickedness and audacity. 

 

“THOU SHALT NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS” 

 

ALL FALSEHOODS IN LAWSUITS ARE FORBIDDEN 

 

This precept then prohibits deceit, lying and perjury on the part of witnessesThe prohibition extends also to plaintiffs, defendants, promoters, representatives, procurators and advocates; in a word, to all who take any part in lawsuits. 

 

FALSE TESTIMONY OUT OF COURT IS FORBIDDEN 

 

Finally, God prohibits all testimony which may inflict injury or injustice, whether it be a matter of legal evidence or not.  In the passage of Leviticus where the Commandments are repeated, we read: Thou shalt not steal; thou shalt not lie, neither shall any man deceive his neighbour. (Leviticus 19: 2) To none, therefore can it be a matter of doubt, that this Commandment condemns lies of every sort, as these words of David explicitly declare: Thou wilt destroy all that speak a lie. (Psalm 5: 7) 

 

THIS COMMANDMENT FORBIDS DETRACTION 

 

This Commandment forbids not only false testimony, but also the detestable vice and practice of detraction,—a pestilence, which is the source of innumerable and calamitous evils.  This vicious habit of secretly reviling and calumniating character is frequently reprobated in the Sacred Scriptures.  With him, says David, I would not eat; (Psalm 100: 5) and Saint James: Detract not one another, my brethren. (James 4: 2) 

 

Holy Writ abounds not only with precepts on the subject, but also with examples which reveal the enormity of the crime.  Aman, by a crime of his own invention, had so incensed Assuerus against the Jews that he ordered the destruction of the entire race. (Esther 13: 6) Sacred history contains many other examples of the same kind, which priests would recall in order to deter the people from such iniquity. 

 

VARIOUS KINDS OF DETRACTION 

 

But, to understand well the nature of this sin of detraction, we must know that reputation is injured not only by calumniating the character, but also by exaggerating the faults of others.  He who gives publicity to the secret sin of any man, in an unnecessary place or time, or before persons who have no right to know, is also rightly regarded as a detractor and evil-speaker, if his revelation seriously injures the other’s reputation. 

 

But of all sorts of calumnies the worst is that which is directed against Catholic doctrine and its teachers.  Persons who extol the propagators of error and of unsound doctrine are guilty of a like crime. 

 

Nor are those to be dissociated from the ranks of evil-speakers, or from their guilt, who, instead of reproving, lend a willing ear and a cheerful assent to the calumniator and reviler.  As we read in Saint Jerome and Saint Bernard, it is not so easy to decide which is more guilty, the detractor, or the listener; for if there were no listeners, there would be no detractors. 

 

To the same category belong those who cunningly foment divisions and excite quarrels; who feel a malignant pleasure in sowing discord, dissevering by fiction and false hood the closest friendships and the dearest social ties, impelling to endless hatred and deadly combat the fondest friends.  Of such pestilent characters the Lord expresses His detestation in these words: Thou shalt not be a detractor nor a whisperer among the people. (Leviticus 19: 16) Of this description were many of the advisers of Saul, who strove to alienate the king’s affection from David and to arouse his enmity against him. (1 Kings 24 and 26)  

 

THIS COMMANDMENT FORBIDS FLATTERY 

 

Among the transgressors of this Commandment are to be numbered those fawners and sycophants who, by flattery and insincere praise, gain the hearing and good will of those whose favor, money, and honors they seek, calling good evil, and evil good, as the Prophet says. (Isaias 5: 20) This class of persons do not, it is true, speak ill of their neighbor; but they greatly injure him, since by praising his sins they cause him to continue in vice to the end of his life. 

 

Of this species of flattery the most pernicious is that which proposes to itself for object the injury and the ruin of others.  Thus Saul, when he sought to expose David to the sword and fury of the Philistines, in order to bring about his death, addressed him in these soothing words: Behold my eldest daughter Merob, her will I give thee to wife; only be a valiant man and fight the battles of the Lord. (1 Kings 18: 17) In the same way the Jews thus insidiously addressed our Lord: Master, we know that thou art a true speaker, and teachest the way of God in truth. (Matthew 22: 16) 

 

Still more pernicious is the language addressed sometimes by friends and relations to a person suffering with a mortal disease, and on the point of death, when they assure him that there is no danger of dying, telling him to be of good spirits, dissuading him from confession, as though the very thought should fill him with melancholy, and finally withdrawing his attention from all care and thought of the dangers which beset him in the last perilous hour. 

 

THIS COMMANDMENT FORBIDS LIES OF ALL KINDS 

 

In a word, lies of every sort are prohibited, especially those that cause grave injury to anyone, while most impious of all is a lie uttered against or regarding religion. 

 

God is also grievously offended by those attacks and slanders which are termed lampoons, and other defamatory publications of this kind. 

 

To deceive by a jocose or officious lie, even though it helps or harms no one, is, notwithstanding, altogether unworthy; for thus the Apostle admonishes us: Putting away lying, speak ye the truth. (Ephesians 4: 25) This practice begets a strong tendency to frequent and serious lying, and from jocose lying men contract the habit of lying, lose all reputation for truth, and ultimately find it necessary, in order to gain belief, to have recourse to continual swearing. 

 

THIS COMMANDMENT FORBIDS HYPOCRISY 

 

Finally, the first part of this Commandment prohibits dissimulation.  It is sinful not only to speak, but to act deceitfully.  Actions, as well as words, are signs of what is in our mind; and hence our Lord, rebuking the Pharisees, frequently calls them hypocrites.  So far with regard to the negative, which is the first part of this Commandment. 

 

Positive Part of this Commandment 

 

JUDGES MUST PASS SENTENCE ACCORDING TO LAW AND JUSTICE 

 

We now come to explain what the Lord commands in the second part.  Its nature and purpose require that trials be conducted on principles of strict justice and according to law.  It requires that no one usurp judicial powers or authority, for as the Apostle writes, it were unjust to judge another man’s servant. (Romans 14: 4) 

 

Again it requires that no one pass sentence without a sufficient knowledge of the case.  This was the sin of the priests and scribes who passed judgment on Saint Stephen. (Acts 7: 59) The magistrates of Philippi furnish another example.  They have beaten us publicly, says the Apostle, uncondemned, men that are Romans, and have cast us into prison; and now do they thrust us out privately. (Acts 16: 37) 

 

This Commandment also requires that the innocent be not condemned, nor the guilty acquitted; and that (the decision) be not influenced by money, or favor, hatred or love.  For so Moses admonished the elders whom he had constituted judges of the people: Judge that which is just, whether he be one of your country or a stranger.  There shall be no difference of persons, you shall hear the little as well as the great; neither shall you respect any man’s person, because it is the judgment of God. (Deuteronomy 1: 16) 

 

WITNESSES MUST GIVE TESTIMONY TRUTHFULLY 

 

With regard to an accused person who is conscious of his own guilt, God commands him to confess the truth, if he is interrogated judicially. [This decision is conditional, as the judicial forms vary in different countries] By that confession he, in some sort, bears witness to, and proclaims the praise and glory of God; and of this we have a proof in these words of Josue, when exhorting Achan to confess the truth: My son, give glory to the Lord the God of Israel. (Josue 7: 19) 

 

But as this Commandment chiefly concerns witnesses, the pastor should give them special attention.  The spirit of the precept not only prohibits false testimony, but also commands the truth to be told.  In human affairs, to bear testimony to the truth is a matter of the highest importance, because there are innumerable things of which we must be ignorant unless we arrive at a knowledge of them on the faith of witnesses.  In matters with which we are not personally acquainted and which we need to know, there is nothing so important as true evidence.  Hence the words of Saint Augustine: He who conceals the truth and he who utters falsehood are both guilty; the one, because he is unwilling to render a service; the other, because he has the will to do an injury. 

 

We are not, however, at all times, obliged to disclose the truth; but when, in a court of justice, a witness is legally interrogated by the judge, he is emphatically bound to tell the whole truth.  Here, however, witnesses should be most circumspect, lest, trusting too much to memory, they affirm for certain what they have not fully ascertained. 

 

LAWYERS AND PLAINTIFFS MUST BE GUIDED BY LOVE OF JUSTICE 

 

Attorneys and counsel, plaintiffs and prosecutors, remain still to be treated of.  The two former should not refuse to contribute their services and legal assistance, when the necessities of others call for their aid.  They should deal generously with the poor.  They should not defend an unjust cause, prolong lawsuits by trickery, nor encourage them for the sake of gain.  As to remuneration for their services and labors, let them be guided by the principles of justice and of equity. 

 

ALL MUST SPEAK TRUTHFULLY AND WITH CHARITY 

 

To all conscientious persons is addressed the divine command that in all their intercourse with society, in every conversation, they should speak the truth at all times from the sincerity of their hearts; that they should utter nothing injurious to the reputation of another, not even of those by whom they know they have been injured and persecuted.  For they should always remember that between them and others there exists such a close social bond that they are all members of the same body.  

 

INDUCEMENTS TO TRUTHFULNESS 

 

In order that the faithful may be more disposed to avoid the vice of lying, the pastor should place before them the extreme lowness and disgrace of this sin.  In the Sacred Scriptures the devil is called the father of lies; for as, he stood not in the truth, he is a liar and the father thereof. (John 8: 44) 

 

To banish so great a sin, (the pastor) should add the mischievous consequences of lying; but since they are innumerable, he must be content with pointing out the chief kinds of these evils and calamities. 

 

In the first place, he should show how grievously lies and deceit offend God and how deeply they are hated by God.  This he should prove from the words of Solomon: Six things there are which the Lord hateth, and the seventh his soul detesteth; haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that deviseth wicked plots, feet that are swift to run into mischief, a deceitful witness that uttereth lies, etc. (Proverbs 6: 16) Who, then, can protect or save from severest chastisements the man who is thus the object of God’s special hate? 

 

Again, what more wicked, what more base than, as Saint James says, with the same tongue, by which we bless God and the Father, to curse men, who are made after the image and likeness of God, so that out of the same fountain flows sweet and bitter water. (James 3: 9, 11) The tongue, which was before employed in giving praise and glory to ‘God, afterwards, as far as it is able, by lying treat Him with ignominy and dishonor.  Hence liars are excluded from a participation in the bliss of heaven.  To David asking, “Lord! who shall dwell in thy tabernacle? The Holy Spirit answers: He that speaketh truth in his heart, who hath not used deceit in his tongue. (Psalm 14: 1, 3) 

 

Lying is also attended with this very great evil that it is an almost incurable disease.  For since the guilt of the calumniator cannot be pardoned, unless satisfaction be made to the calumniated person, and since, as we have already observed, this duty is difficult for those who are deterred from its performance by false shame and a foolish idea of dignity, we cannot doubt that he who continues in this sin is destined to the unending punishments of hell.  Let no one indulge the hope of obtaining the pardon of his calumnies or detractions, until he has repaired the injury which they have inflicted on the honor or fame of another, whether this was done in a court of justice, or in private and familiar conversation. 

 

But the evil consequences of lying are widespread and extend to society at large.  By duplicity and lying, good faith and truth, which form the closest links of human society, are dissolved, confusion ensues, and men seem to differ in nothing from demons. 

 

HOW TO AVOID LYING 

 

The pastor should also teach that loquacity is to be avoided.  By avoiding loquacity (talkativeness) other evils will be obviated, and a great preventive opposed to lying, from which loquacious persons can scarcely abstain. 

 

Excuses for Lying Refuted 

 

THE PLEA OF PRUDENCE 

 

There are those who seek to justify their duplicity either by the unimportance of what they say, or by the example of the worldly wise who, they claim, lie at the proper time.  The pastor should correct such erroneous ideas by answering what is most true, namely, that the wisdom of the flesh is death. (Romans 8: 6) He should exhort his listeners in all their difficulties and dangers to trust in God, not in the artifice of lying; for those who have recourse to subterfuge (deceit), plainly show that they trust more to their own prudence than to the providence of God. 

 

THE PLEA OF REVENGE

 

Those who lay the blame of their own falsehood on others, who first deceived them by lies, are to be taught the unlawfulness of avenging their own wrongs, and that evil is not to be rendered for evil, but rather that evil is to be overcome by good.  (Romans 12: 17, 21) Even if it were lawful to return evil for evil, it would not be to our interest to harm ourselves in order to get revenge.  The man who seeks revenge by uttering falsehood inflicts very serious injury on himself. 

 

THE PLEAS OF FRAILTY, HABIT, AND BAD EXAMPLE 

 

Those who plead human frailty are to be taught that it is a duty of religion to implore the divine assistance, and not to yield to human infirmity. 

 

Those who excuse themselves by habit are to be admonished to endeavor to acquire the contrary habit of speaking the truth; particularly as those who sin habitually are more guilty than others. 

 

There are some who adduce in their own justification the example of others, who, they contend, constantly indulge in falsehood and perjury.  Such persons should be undeceived by reminding them that bad men are not to be imitated, but reproved and corrected; and that, when we ourselves are addicted to the same vice, our admonitions have less influence in reprehending and correcting it in others. 

 

THE PLEAS OF CONVENIENCE, AMUSEMENT, AND ADVANTAGE 

 

With regard to those who defend their conduct by saying that to speak the truth is often attended with inconvenience, priests should answer that (such an excuse) is an accusation, not a defence, since it is the duty of a Christian to suffer any inconvenience rather than utter a falsehood. There remain two other classes of persons who seek to justify lying: those who say that they tell lies for the sake of amusement, and those who plead motives of interest, claiming that without recourse to lies, they can neither buy nor sell to advantage.  The pastor should endeavor to reform both these kinds of liars.   He should correct the former by showing how strong a habit of sinning is contracted by their practice, and by strongly impressing upon them the truth that for every idle word they shall render an account. (Matthew 12: 36) As for the second class, he should upbraid them with greater severity, because their very excuse is a most serious accusation against themselves, since they show thereby that they yield no faith or confidence to these words of God: Seek first the kingdom of God and his justice, and all these things shall be added unto you. (Matthew 6: 33) (COT p. 454 – 465) 


Conclusion

We must strive to be holy, as we are members of the One True Church which bears the Mark of Holiness. In order to be holy, we must be ever mindful of the duties we have imposed on us by the Eighth Commandment.

40 comments:

  1. Dear Introibo,
    I want to tell you that today is the anniversary of the Christianization of the Philippines in 1521 when the chaplain of the Magellan expedition baptized the Cebuano queen Juana and was given an image of the Child Jesus. The statue of the child Jesus is venerated in our town of Cebu City. Also, this April 15 will be the anniversary of the Titanic sinking. Please pray for the victims on that ship.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ryan,
      Interesting anniversaries! Thank you for sharing!

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  2. John Gregory,

    This is a much needed article. I hope people take time to read it carefully and benefit from it as much as I did. Thank you for the guest post.

    I do have a question though. Say you are put in a situation where somebody innocently asks you something that you cannot reveal, whether it be on behalf of another person who wants to keep it secret, or something you personally want to be kept secret; What are you to do?

    Lee

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lee,

      Not a direct answer to your question but maybe you'll find it a bit helpful; this is from Fr. Leo Trese's book "The Faith Explained" (pp. 254-255; first ed. published in 1959 but the one available online has sadly suffered a Vatican 2 "update" in certain areas:

      "There are certain conventional phrases, too, which on the face of them might appear to be lies but which are not lies because all intelligent people understand what they mean. “I don’t know” is an example of such a phrase. An intelligent person understands that “I don’t know” may mean either of two things: I really don’t know” or I am not at liberty to tell. This is the answer that a priest—or a doctor or lawyer or parent — might give to someone seeking information which is confidential.
      (...)
      Another possible sin against the eighth commandment is the revealing of a secret which has been entrusted to me. My obligation to secrecy may arise from a promise made, or from my profession (doctor, lawyer, newsman, etc.), or simply because charity forbids that I make known what would offend or hurt another. The only times I might reveal such a secret without sin would be when it was necessary in order to prevent grave harm — to the community, to an innocent third party, or to the holder of the secret himself.
      (...) In all these instances, the gravity of the sin will be proportionate to the harm done or the offense given."

      https://where-you-are.net/ebooks/faith-explained-leo-trese.pdf

      I hope John Gregory won't mind my barging in ;-)

      God Bless,
      Joanna

      Delete
    2. Joanna,
      Thank you! Yes, that is the use of a "broad mental reservation." It is not lying and necessary under serious circumstances. Real life case: Fr. DePauw, prior to entering the seminary, fought the Nazis and was taken prisoner of war. He and his best friend escaped. Father was shot in the foot and had pain there for the rest of his life that got worse with age. He and his friend were being chased by Nazi soldiers who would shoot escaped prisoners in the head and leave their body to rot where it lie.

      Father and his friend came to the house of an old German woman and begged for help. She told them to hide under her kitchen floorboards. The Nazis arrived minutes later, and knocked at the door. She greeted them, and they asked her if she had seen escaped prisoners. She said "No" and told them to look around the yard. They did so and left. The next day, she helped them to leave and they made it to safety in an Allied camp. That woman saved Father DePauw's life. Did she lie? Absolutely NOT.

      The Nazis had no right to the information which would allow them to murder the soldiers. Her "No" meant "No information I can transmit to you." She told the truth via a necessary broad mental reservation.

      For an in-depth explanation of mental reservations see theologians McHugh and Callan, "Moral Theology," [1930], 2:436-440.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    3. Joanna and Introibo,

      That is good stuff you share. Thank you.

      Lee

      Delete
    4. Thank you Lee. I defer to Joanna who gave a wonderful response.

      Delete
    5. Joanna, I don't mind you barging in at all. In fact I am quite grateful. You prevented me from looking stupid :o) Seriously, thank you very much for your input. I enjoy reading your comments in all the posts.

      Delete
    6. Thank you for your response Introibo!!!

      Delete
    7. Great information! Thank you.
      -S.T.

      Delete
  3. Greetings to Introibo, John Gregory, and the other readers. I wanted to thank the author for his article, but I have an unrelated question.

    I know the question is stupid, but as you well know, in the official Church—the Novus Ordo, according to you—more and more people are arguing that it's obvious to anyone who isn't Catholic—even to me, who isn't particularly educated. For example, recently a theologian named Andrea Grilo, a great enemy of the Traditional Mass and one of the initiators of the motu proprio "Traditionis custodes," stated that it can't be said that the female priesthood cannot come. We also know that many support or excuse sodomite relationships, be they faithful, priests, bishops, etc. To give another example, a German bishop stated that "sexual morality must change." My question would be: beyond the fact that many of us might say "well, these people are projecting what they want to happen." Okay, but aside from that, I wonder how they can sell this as "Catholic"? It's not supported by the Bible, nor by what the Church teaches—if the Seventh Day Adventist Church doesn't support any of the things I just mentioned—nor does it have any basis to hold on to.

    Suppose I'm a priest and I tell you I want women to have the "right" to be ordained priests. Regardless of my preference, I couldn't give you any argument that this is Catholic or Christian. You could give me an argument that my position isn't Catholic. How can so many people believe this has anything to do with Catholicism?

    Thank you!

    Young reader from Spain

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Correction, problems with the translator: where it says "Adventist Church" I meant to say "nor does the VII support any of the things I just cited."

      Delete
    2. A woman "priest" is a motherfather.

      Delete
    3. I'm sorry for bothering you. I understand my questions are inappropriate and that I'm not at your level. I didn't mean to bother you, Introibo. Thanks.

      Delete
    4. Young Reader from Spain,
      You are never a bother. I always welcome sincere questions. How people accept the non-Catholic as Catholic? Some out of ignorance of the Faith (culpable or otherwise), some out of trying to justify what they want.

      Just remember that what's important is not why others believe, but know and defend the true Faith which you must believe.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  4. John Gregory,

    This is a good topic for all to consider.

    A Blessed Holy Week and Happy Easter to everyone.

    -TradWarrior

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TradWarrior,
      A Blessed Holy Week and Happy Easter to you as well, my friend!

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. Thank you TradWarior! Love your comments, keep them up!!!

      Delete
  5. Thank you for comments everyone. I hope to respond in more detail tomorrow. Love to all during this most holy time of the year!

    ReplyDelete
  6. A great writing John.Thank you.

    May everyone have a very blessed and grace filled Holy Week.

    TradSedeCath,NZ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you very much TradSedeCath,NZ! Nice user name!

      Delete
  7. John and Introibo

    Over on One Peter Five,Eric Simmons has stated the following on his recent writing


    "The on the question of a Heretical Pope has not been definitively Resolved.And that is a fact.I challenge every Sede right now to produce a manifestly definitive act of any Pope or Council which has bound all the faithful to any opinion about this disputed question.They cannot produce such a text so therefore they make themselves Pope!"

    He also makes a comment from Peter Kwasniewski that the folk at Novus Ordo Watch have effectively founded a new Catholicism without the Pope.

    James

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It has been resolved that a public heretic cannot be pope. As bishop Sanborn has said "you do the math". The Novus Ordo watch professes a different religion than the v2 religion. It may be of some surprise to bad willed idiots that NOW did not found any religion, but follow the One founded by Christ in 33 AD.

      Delete
    2. James,
      I want to add something: R&R are like Feeneyites because both do not understand the Magisterium. When 1P5 says the question of a heretical pope has not been "definitively resolved," they are looking for an ex cathedra decision, e.g., "If anyone saith a manifest heretic can be the pope, anathema sit." If there is no such pronouncement, they think it is open to discussion and unresolved.

      Certain dogmas preclude other things being the case without needing an ex cathedra pronouncement. For example, it is dogmatically defined that Jesus Christ is True God and True Man. If someone were to claim "Jesus Christ is an angel" that [roposition stands condemned and cannot be true for it contradicts Him being True God and True Man. You do not need an ex cathedra decree, "If anyone saith Jesus Christ is an angel and not True God and True Man, let him be anathema."

      Likewise, it is of Faith that the Church is Indefectible. She cannot give that which is evil or erroneous to Her members. However, Bergoglio gives evil and error to members, therefore it did not come from the Church. If it did not come from the Church, Bergoglio cannot be head of the Church. Welcome to sedevacantism!

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  8. John
    According to a recent research project:Sometime around 2075,Islam will be the dominant religion.Muslim fertility rate-2.9 children per woman on average.I am sure it is higher then that.Going down to my local store,I have seen a woman with 9 children.Frighting times.God bless

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some Muslims make people who claim to be Christian look bad by comparison. Like with all religions, this is a wide variety of adherents, some worse than others. It least they do not hate Jesus as those who follow the Talmud do. They are being persecuted by the powers that be in their own land with the help of the U.S.

      We must help institute the social reign of Christ the King and Mary our Immaculate Queen!!!

      Delete
    2. That can happen, but also many of them eventually leave Islam (apostatize). Furthermore, there are Moslem modernists, just as there are "Catholic" modernists.

      Delete
  9. Hi Introibo, sorry off-topic (to the article); could you please give a quick appraisal of the post-1955 Holy Week liturgy? You may have written a post on this. If so, could you please dir ct me to it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://cmri.org/articles-on-the-traditional-catholic-faith/cmri-and-the-liturgy-of-pope-pius-xii/



      Delete
    2. @anon12:34
      Please see my post:

      https://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2021/03/a-bugnini-free-holy-week.html

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  10. Bearing false witness seems to be the official policy of the media and the 'woke'. And they think they are doing good.

    ReplyDelete
  11. John Gregory,

    Thank you for a very interesting post on an important topic.

    A blessed Easter to all!
    -S.T.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seeking Truth,

      Happy Easter, my friend!

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. Seeking Truth,

      Joyous Easter to you and yours, my friend, and to all who visit this blog!

      God Bless You All,
      Joanna

      Delete
    3. Blessed holy Easter to all!
      I really need help in finding the Truth! I find much here but I see many still fooled by the world...if you fooled by virus, or other scams it is hard to believe you...the Church fathers don’t seem to approach these topics! God help me/us!

      Delete
    4. I understand to a small degree! I still have nightmares re deceased parents.

      Delete