In St. Jude 1:3, we read, "Dearly beloved, taking all care to write unto you concerning your common salvation, I was under a necessity to write unto you: to beseech you to contend earnestly for the faith once delivered to the saints." [Emphasis mine]. Contending For The Faith is a series of posts dedicated to apologetics (i.e., the intellectual defense of the truth of the Traditional Catholic Faith) to be published the first Monday of each month. This is the next installment.
Sadly, in this time of Great Apostasy, the faith is under attack like never before, and many Traditionalists don't know their faith well enough to defend it. Remember the words of our first pope, "But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect..." (1Peter 3:16). There are five (5) categories of attacks that will be dealt with in these posts. Attacks against:
- The existence and attributes of God
- The truth of the One True Church established by Christ for the salvation of all
- The truth of a particular dogma or doctrine of the Church
- The truth of Catholic moral teaching
- The truth of the sedevacantist position as the only Catholic solution to what has happened since Vatican II
In addition, controversial topics touching on the Faith will sometimes be featured, so that the problem and possible solutions may be better understood. If anyone had suggestions for topics that would fall into any of these categories, you may post them in the comments. I cannot guarantee a post on each one, but each will be carefully considered.
Digital Occultism
As I've written about many times, the "Occult Invasion" began in the wake of Vatican II. With the advent of AI and technology, occultism is spreading error and evil faster than ever. This post will serve as a warning of the new dangers that arise with new tech. (N.B. I have collected information from multiple sources, both online and in print. I take no credit for the information herein. All I did was condense the material into a terse and readable post, and adding some commentary.---Introibo).
AI Meets Tarot Cards and Astrology
From an occult-friendly website:
AI Tarot Decks → Neural networks generating entirely new symbolic decks, trained on thousands of illustrated archetypes.
Algorithmic Astrology → Platforms mapping planetary alignments with predictive analytics, some even gamifying daily horoscopes.
Occult Chatbots → Digital familiars trained on magical texts, offering guidance, affirmations, and spell recipes in real time.
Skeptics roll their eyes—what can a machine know of spirit? But the occult has always evolved with tools of the age. Astrology once used clay tablets, later telescopes. Tarot’s evolution has included woodcuts, photography, even VR. Why not AI?
The digital cauldron is bubbling, and witches, seekers, and the simply curious are stirring it. Neural nets become oracles. Algorithms become star charts. Spellcraft meets system design.
The question isn’t whether AI can be mystical—it’s how we choose to enchant the machine
(See honeysucklemag.com/ai-tarot-algorithmic-astrology-mystic-tech; Emphasis mine).
There are astrology apps where you can access your charts online for free — you no longer need to call the Psychic Friends Network. There are dating apps that check to see if your stars align with potential mates. You can even download personalized Spotify playlists based on your astrological sign. The occult is alive and well online. TicTok, the most popular social media platform among pre-teens and teenagers, has easy accessibility to Wicca (witchcraft). Magic and witchcraft are featured prominently on TikTok. Whether you’re looking at #witchtok or #newage, you’ll find help with crystals, guided meditation, manifesting, Tarot cards, and hexing (i.e., casting spells on people).
This type of behavior is not benign; it is dangerous. Viewers are also learning how to cast spells, create their own Tarot decks, charge their crystals, and write their own book of shadows and instruction manual for magick rituals. There are even those claiming to be "Christian Witches" to entice those who would normally stay away from the occult due to their religious beliefs. One TikToker, Stephanie (@thecelticsbrew), was asked if someone could love Jesus and witchcraft, and she said:
Witchcraft is using nature and other tools to manifest your desires by working with a higher power or deity. I personally believe someone that wants to use a higher power, say words, incantations, or prayers to manifest their desires, then that’s okay….The Bible now today says that witchcraft is a sin after hundreds of years of it being translated by man — not by God. So yes, you can love Jesus and witchcraft. If God really did make all the world, I don’t think that He would be against you using nature with metaphysical properties to help manifest or help things in your life. God and Jesus are just deities.
Why It Stands Condemned
Tarot cards and astrology, whether by using a physical deck, or an AI algorithm, is an attempt to know the future. Divination has existed in all cultures throughout history. Its basic idea involves foretelling the future or accessing occult information by various means. Traditionally, the person who practiced divination was regarded as having supernatural powers. Despite its frequent modern reformulation in psychological or parapsychological terms (e.g., receiving information from “the unconscious” or “higher” mind), historically, divination has always been an attempt to communicate with the supernatural or “divine” realm in order to secure information from the “gods.” Its fundamentally pagan and spiritistic nature has never changed, regardless of how “modern” its practices have become today.
The reason that divination is forbidden is quite simple: Almighty God forbids it and finds it detestable. Some people claiming to be "Christian" or "Catholic" will (similar to Satan in the desert with Christ) quote from Scripture to justify their divination practices. They reject and/or purposely misinterpret Church teaching and the Bible's clear prohibitions on such wickedness. In the Old Testament, there were times when God had to communicate His will for specific reasons, and He chose particular methods. Thus, in the Bible, certain exceptional methods were used to discover God’s specific will, such as the Urim and Thummim, dreams, through the Old Testament prophets, and casting lots (See Exodus 28:30; Acts 1:24-26). These methods are replaced by other means (See Hebrews 1:1-2). We now have everything we need to know via the Deposit of Revelation and the Magisterium.
As Traditionalist Catholics, we are to trust in Christ's Church and in His sovereignty over future events, both in our own lives and in the final outcome of human affairs. For very good reasons, God has not and does not reveal our specific, individual futures. For example, no one likes pain, and if we knew the future, most of us would try to avoid unpleasant situations, suffering, and tragedy. These things may be God’s will for us, and we are avoiding what God has wisely determined is best for us from the eternal perspective. People grow in their faith and in their ability to endure things. God’s Will that cannot be endured at one point in life, may be able to be endured or accepted at another.
The condemnation of divination comes to us from the passages of the Bible (as rightly interpreted by the Magisterium) and the Church of Her own authority. According to theologian Slater:
On Divination. We here suppose that the devil, a wicked spirit of great intelligence and power, but subject to God, exists and continually interferes in the affairs of men in order to ruin them. This truth belongs to the Catholic Faith and cannot be denied without sin. The sin of divination is committed when the devil is invoked expressly or tacitly in order to discover what is secret and hidden. There is express invocation of the devil when his aid is expressly implored. The devil is tacitly invoked when altogether inadequate means are used to find out what is occult [hidden], means which are not sufficient for the purpose naturally, and which have not been ordained by God for that purpose. The devil is eager to be appealed to in order the more easily to attain his own ends, and anyone who uses such inadequate means to find out hidden secrets virtually appeals to the devil to help him. A great variety of such means of divination has been in use from the earliest times among all nations; and periods which have witnessed a decay of faith have also witnessed a recrudescence [recurrence] of these superstitions...The devil sometimes takes possession of the body of a human being and manifests what is secret through it; this was called pythonism. The devil had his prophets as God had. In necromancy the devil answers through the dead called to life again...Divination is mortally sinful, for it is a great insult to God to hold intercourse with and seek aid from the devil, His bitter enemy; and besides, it is most dangerous to the parties concerned. He is wont gradually to insinuate himself until he has his victim within his power, and then he works on him his evil will. (See A Manual of Moral Theology, [1925], 1:141-142; Emphasis mine).
The method of divination (e.g. a deck of cards or virtual cards by AI) matters not; it is sinful in the very intention. According to theologian Jone, "Spiritism claims to be able to communicate with the spirit world and endeavors to establish such commerce with it. Although spiritism is for the most part fraud, still the intention alone to enter into communication with spirits is gravely sinful. Therefore, it is mortally sinful to conduct a spiritistic seance or to act as a medium." (See Moral Theology, pg. 100; Emphasis mine). Furthermore, as theologian Slater reminds us, the intention to invoke the devil may be tacit. (op. cit.).
As to the rant of Stephanie the Witch, she makes several glaring errors about being a witch and "loving Jesus."
- Stephanie argues that witchcraft is communicating with a higher power, and because God is a higher power, witchcraft is fine. She demeans God as being on par with other so-called gods. Witches use God at their own whims through demonic means, and frankly, many could take Him or leave Him, willingly swapping Him for any other "deity." Sheer blasphemy
- Stephanie doesn’t trust the Bible — Scripture is a translation of a translation passed down by men over time. She doesn't know the Church as the Guardian of Scripture and the massive amount of evidence the Catholic translations today are accurate
- Stephanie argues that God made everything, so He wouldn’t be against us using witchcraft. By that logic, all evil actions are okay with God, too, since they proceed from people who God made, ergo we shouldn’t punish murderers, abusers, or rapists.
AI and Necromancy
Now we are told that we can use AI to alleviate the pain of death and separation. “AI ghosts (also called deathbots, griefbots, AI clones, death avatars, and postmortem avatars) are large language models built on available information about the deceased, such as social media, letters, photos, diaries, and videos,” which are created and marshalled to interact with interested parties for a fee.
(See thehastingscenter.org/griefbots-are-here-raising-questions-of-privacy-and-well-being).
This new AI technology allows for video of a person to be stored then redeployed after that person’s death through an avatar that speaks for the dead person. It is a deep fake that is known to be fake but is supposed to provide advice and solace, nonetheless. Both the Church and Bible strongly condemn necromancy: "Let no one be found among you who sacrifices their son or daughter in the fire, who practices divination or sorcery, interprets omens, engages in witchcraft, or casts spells, or who is a medium or spiritist or who consults the dead. Anyone who does these things is detestable to the LORD; because of these same detestable practices the LORD your God will drive out those nations before you." (See Deuteronomy 18:10-12; Emphasis mine.)
The same prohibition would rest upon digital necromancy. I offer four (4) reasons:
- Digital necromancy takes us to the wrong place to find counsel and fellowship. It is a world of pseudo-enchantment, the digital masquerade of the dead appearing to be alive for the sake of the living. If these griefbots offer advice, it may be acted upon. You are relying on technologically produced "spirits" instead of seeking solace in prayer and the sacraments.
- We must face death in Traditionalist Catholic terms. It is faith in the living Christ that lessens this sting of death, not AI impersonations.
- Digital necromancy assigns to an impersonal computer program the challenging human work of memory, appreciation, judgment, and imagination. We should prayerfully reflect and not simulate.
- To assign this work of reflection and judgment to an AI avatar is to cheapen the memory of our loved ones, and to reduce them to algorithms.
Texting with "Jesus" and..."Satan"?
According to one source:
The app Text With Jesus uses artificial intelligence and chatbots to offer spiritual guidance to users who are looking to connect with a higher power.,,
Text With Jesus offers users an interactive experience with a religious deity. In other words, users can text questions to Jesus and get a response. (Premium users can also converse with Satan.)...
"Who am I really texting with when I text with Jesus?" Thomson asked.
"Well obviously you're talking to an AI chatbot," the app's creator said, adding that the bots are "pretending to be Jesus or any of the apostles."...
(See today.com/news/religious-chatbot-apps-rcna243671; Emphasis mine).
The problems should be obvious:
- We lift our minds and hearts to God in prayer. It is blasphemous to take time away from God and treat an algorithm as Our Lord
- Do you act upon advice given by a machine as coming from God? More blasphemy
- Texting with Satan? The mere intent to enter into communication with the devil is seriously sinful; why would anyone one do that? Vain curiosity, or far worse. Play with fire, you'll get burned. Invite evil into your life, you can be sure it will take you up on your offer.
Conclusion
The days are evil. The Occult Invasion continues unabated. The rise of new technology makes the occult ever more accessible, and will draw in the curious. Be aware and warn people you know of its dangers. Don't "text with (so-called) Jesus," pray to the real Jesus Christ and His Blessed Mother. Respect the deceased and do not attempt "digitalized communication" with computerized versions of them. Finally, as to divination, let us leave the future in God's Hands, Who Alone knows what it will bring. Be content with facing each day in Faith and hope being in sanctifying grace. God will take care of the rest. "Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." (St. Matthew 6:34).

Dear Introibo,
ReplyDeleteI wish you a happy feast of Our Lady of Good Success of Quito.
I remember one time I read from a Protestant who refuted AI necromancy. It was about a mother talking to the AI avatar of her dead daughter in South Korea. She said it was so demonic. The year I read that was 2022.
Ryan,
DeleteYes, any one of good will can see the occult is bad news, and now AI disseminates it even more. Very demonic.
God Bless,
---Introibo
AI is a tool that can be useful but can also be dangerous when misused, for example in occultism or pornography. We do not need to know what is reserved for God alone, such as when the world will end, but we must remain vigilant and keep the faith in this dark period.
ReplyDeleteSimon,
DeleteWell stated, my friend!
God Bless,
---Introibo
What do you think of SSPX consecrating new bishops?
ReplyDeleteArchbishop Lefebvre declared that the See of Rome and positions of authority in the Church were occupied by antichrists, but the SSPX collaborates with them, whereas the normal reflex for a traditionalist Catholic should be to denounce modernist apostates and flee from them. What agreement can there be with people whom Pope Saint Pius X called “the worst enemies of the Church” ?
DeleteExcellent reply Simon. What is wrong with the SSPX . Just read the reason why it will be in July is to give Rome time to change their ways and come back to Tradition. They are in fantasy land.
DeleteIf Rome has lost the faith, it is not the FSSPX that will bring it back, because it professes errors regarding submission to the Pope and many others. Sedevacantists are the true traditionalist Catholics because they profess the integral faith.
DeleteElon Musk, one of the new world order agents, even admits AI is summoning the devil. I had never heard of the necromancy! This world is a freak show and the novus ordo is the worst show of all. It is beyond baffling that so many, over a billion, are still fooled when you can now see all the NO freak shows online. TiA sends out the photos almost daily yet even they remain R&R. Scary! I heard Bp Pivarunas say they he showed these photos to their school children, who were never exposed to the NO, and the children could not believe that adults thought this was a Mass! Someone said to me that if novus ordites cannot see that the Vicar of Christ would not bless sodomite unions then they will never see.
ReplyDelete@anon10:53
DeleteI agree with that person. If "blessing" sodomites--committing one of the Four Sins That Scream To Heaven For Vengeance--doesn't wake them up, only an incredible grace of God could ever do so.
God Bless,
---Introibo
God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah because of the homosexuality of its inhabitants, and the V2 sect asks God to “bless” these unnatural unions. What appalling blasphemy ! The V2 sect comes from hell !
DeleteI certainly enjoy your expose of the occult. Most even in the Trad World seem to be blind.
ReplyDeleteI have in recent months had a woman working in my work place who is devout hindu . I sense when ever she is around ,there is a strange and bad presence. I have a very strong Faith and always ask our Lady and St Michael for protection.
Someone asked last week about country and western music. I thought you did a great expose in your music series.
God bless Introibo
@anon11:46
DeleteThank you for the kind words, my friend! Beware of Hindus. They are pagan, and their "gods" are demons. I hope you also wear a scapular and a St. Benedict medal.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Anon 8.16 AM
ReplyDeleteYes, just read the news about the SSPX new bishops to be consecrated on 1st July. It will be interesting to see how many and which priests are chosen ? Do any of you people think some could be doubtful Novus Ordo "clerics" who have not been conditionally reordained . What about having the same mindset of bishop Fellay. Interesting times
@anon12:02
DeleteVery interesting times. I'll elaborate more in response to a comment below.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Introibo
ReplyDeleteRegarding the new SSPX bishops. They are still hoping to meet with Prevost before 1st July to explain their decision and get his "blessing" They are on another planet thinking this. Why can't they be bold like the Saints and yell from the rooftops , he is an apostate and his sect is not the Church.
Ryan
Ireland
Ryan,
DeleteTheir R&R theology is keeping them from doing what's right. Sedevacantism is their only hope.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Dear Introibo and readers, I wanted to follow-up on my post from December 22nd where I shared my feelings of abandonment and separation from God. The weeks since that post have been difficult. but today I admitted to someone that the sense of loneliness and isolation were killing me. I mentioned to my boss and supervisor last week that I feel like there's a monster just beneath the surface trying to get out. I struggle not to be overcome with despair, despondency, depression, and an overwhelming anxiety. Any prayers would be greatly appreciated.
ReplyDeleteI recommend physical exercise and talking to someone. I pray for blessings and guidance to you in your situation.
DeleteCyrus,
DeleteAlways praying for you, my friend. I ask my readers to continue to pray for you in your depression. Be assured God is with you even when He seems far away and He loves you. He and his Blessed Mother will see you through.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Cyrus,
DeleteIn addition to what I and others on this blog have mentioned to help you in terms of spiritual help, there is one other VERY important thing that needs mentioning, not just for you, but for all readers that read Introibo’s blog. And this is devotion to St. Joseph. St. Joseph’s power before God is enormous and he is way too much of a forgotten saint. St. Teresa of Avila (herself a mystic and miracle worker) said that never did St. Joseph fail her when she was in need of help. Jesus and Mary were under his dominion when they were on Earth. He had charge over them as Head of the Holy Family. I have mentioned several things on this blog to different readers for spiritual help including receiving the sacraments, praying the daily rosary, the Chaplet of St. Michael, wearing the Brown Scapular, wearing a St. Benedict Medal (to ward off the demons), and much more! But the intercession of St. Joseph needs to be up there too. He supersedes Ss. Peter and Paul. He supersedes St. John the Baptist (the greatest of the prophets). He supersedes St. Michael the Archangel (the leader of the holy angels). He is only surpassed by The Blessed Virgin Mary in heavenly rank. Go to St. Joseph and go to him often. His powerful intercession is neglected and forgotten by so many and that is unfortunate. He will help you.
Stay strong my friend.
-TradWarrior
That is a beautiful tribute to Saint Joseph. Thank you.
DeleteThanks Introibo and TradWarrior. I plan on doing a devotion to St. Joseph for the month of March and will him to my daily prayers.
Delete@anon7:08pm,
DeleteYou’re very welcome!
God Bless,
-TradWarrior
Cyrus,
DeleteYou’re welcome.
God bless,
-TradWarrior
I am devoted to St Joseph, pretty sure he just helped me again in a huge way. But is he really on the ladder higher than St John the Baptist whom Jesus said no man was higher?
Delete@anon7:18pm,
DeleteYou cite Jesus saying that no man was higher than John the Baptist, yet this could have meant among the prophets only. St. Paul says in Romans 3:23 that all have sinned. Have all sinned? No, The Blessed Virgin Mary never did, so “all” does not mean “ALL” here.
When we weigh all of the evidence I think that the chips clearly fall on the scale of St. Joseph over St. John the Baptist.
1 – St. Joseph’s name is not mentioned in the Confiteor, but it does not have to be, just as Our Lady’s Immaculate Conception and Assumption are not explicitly stated in Scripture. His silence in Scripture only shows his humility. There is not a single word uttered by St. Joseph in Sacred Scripture. There was no need. This silent warrior led by example.
2 – St. Joseph, in the natural order was the Head of the Holy Family. Mary and Jesus were both subject to him. He was the King of the King of Kings. Jesus was subject to St. Joseph for roughly 30 years and was obedient to him. The Son of God, the 2nd Person of the Blessed Trinity, the creator of the universe, was subject to a mere creature – His foster father. This goes to a whole other level that St. John the Baptist could not possibly touch. God said to St. Bridget, “My Son was so obedient that when Joseph said do this or that, immediately He did it.”
3 – St. Joseph is the “Terror of the demons”. St. John the Baptist does not yield this type of intercessory power over the devils, as St. Joseph does, whom they fear VERY much.
4 – St. Joseph is included in the decree of the Incarnation. He, though to a lesser degree, is a part of the Incarnation of the Son of God.
5 – St. Joseph is included in the order of the Hypostatic Union. God the Son had a human nature and His earthly father had charge over this God Man by being subject to His human father. St. John the Baptist cannot touch this level of closeness that Jesus and Joseph had.
6 – St. Joseph had royal blood. He was of the tribe of Judah and the House of David. Of this lineage, a King would be born.
7 – Many theologians taught that St. Joseph when contracting original sin had it immediately cancelled and purged by the grace of the future Savior. At the sound of Mary’s greeting to Elizabeth, The Holy Ghost cleansed St. John the Baptist of original sin. According to many theologians, St. Joseph had his original sin cleansed much quicker.
8 - According to many theologians, St. Joseph was freed from all concupiscence, which was necessary as the future father of the Redeemer.
CONTINUED...
Delete9 – The saints and theologians taught that when St. Joseph was born, all of the angels in Heaven rejoiced, for the earthly father of the Son of God had been born on earth and it was only a matter of time that he would take dominion over the Savior of the world. Likewise, the souls in the Limbo of the Fathers also rejoiced when St. Joseph was born for their angels in Limbo revealed to them that this signified that it would not be long until St. Joseph’s Divine Son would free them and usher them into Heaven.
10 – St. Joseph’s marriage to Mary was a TRUE marriage. Though they remained perfectly chaste, it was a marriage and the graces that the Mediatrix of All Graces dispensed (along with Her Divine Son) would have exponentially increased St. Joseph’s holiness (which already was enormous before being a part of The Holy Family). By St. Joseph being surrounded every day for roughly 30 years by Jesus and Mary, his holiness would have accelerated and exponentially increased very quickly to a rate that no human can fathom. St. John the Baptist was not around Jesus and Mary for 30 years. The graces of St. Joseph would FAR EXCEED those of The Baptist.
11 – Angels came to St. Joseph to warn him numerous times of the dangers that threatened The Holy Family.
12 – The honor and veneration given to The Blessed Virgin Mary (Hyperdulia) is next followed by that of St. Joseph (Protodulia). All others follow after that. This would include St. John the Baptist.
13 – It is the firm belief of many theologians including Gerson, St. Francis de Sales, St. Bernardine of Siena, St. Vincent Ferrer, Suarez, and many others, that St. Joseph is BOTH soul AND body in Heaven, because it would be unfathomable that Jesus could take His mother but not His father wholly into Heaven, body and soul.
14 – Pope Pius IX proclaimed St. Joseph “Patron of the Universal Church,” quite possibly the most glorified title the church bestowed on him. St. John the Baptist does not have this most prestigious honor.
15 – Pope Leo XIII in his encyclical “Quamquam Pluries,” made it very clear that after The Blessed Virgin Mary, St. Joseph ranks next among those in glory in Heaven.
16 – Many theologians, such as Fr. Garrigou-Lagrange, clearly taught that after The Blessed Virgin Mary, St. Joseph is pre-eminent over all the celestial court, due to his unique role as the earthly father of Jesus Christ.
17 – St. Joseph raised the Son of God. Jesus was subject to him. St. Joseph would have fed him, bathed him, put him to bed, taught him his craft as a master carpenter, and so much more! St. John the Baptist (great as he was) was nowhere near this level in the divine or natural order.
The case is quite clear that St. Joseph supersedes St. John the Baptist.
-TradWarrior
Dear TradWarrior, do you recommend the Chaplet of Saint Joseph? I also found a copy of "A Manual of Practical Devotion to St. Joseph" by Fr. Patrignani, SJ. Are you familiar with this book or do you recommend another one? I did have a daily meditation book that I can't seem to find ( I have a lot of books!) in my collection, but don't remember the exact title and author.
DeleteOhhhhhh THANK YOU TW FOR St Joseph information. Amazing because St J helping me right now. He is so tender in who he sends to help me, and they are always named Joseph!
DeleteI just re read the article and Joseph list and it made me weep. Thank you! It was so beautiful. It makes me angry that the novus ordo kept teaching me nonsense which had me confused and searching for years! And it is very hard to figure out where the truth lies in that awful web. NO told me Joseph had a previous family and children! That never made sense at all to me as they were basically saying a Saint abandoned his first family for the Holy Family. I am so disgusted by novus ordo evils! Thanks again Trad Warrior...I am going to copy this so I have forever! God bless all!
DeleteHi Cyrus,
DeleteI think the Chaplet of St. Joseph would probably be fine. I have that chaplet also. I just don’t know where I put it at the moment. Meditation on the 7 Sorrows and the 7 Joys of St. Joseph are good to do too for meditation. I am not familiar with the book you mentioned, but it does look interesting. I think the book “The Life and Glories of St. Joseph” by Edward Healy Thompson is very good too.
God bless you,
-TradWarrior
@anon5:06pm,
DeleteYou’re welcome. I am glad that my comment helped you.
God Bless,
-TradWarrior
@anon5:20pm,
DeleteYou’re welcome. I am glad that my comment was helpful to you.
God bless you,
-TradWarrior
I agree with you Ryan. Let us pray for the SSPX. There are good priests and people there who are blind. I am sure there are sedes who attend there.
ReplyDelete@anon3:17
DeleteYes, I'm sure there are sedes who go there who have no other choice for the Mass and sacraments.
God Bless,
---Introibo
TradWarrior
ReplyDeleteWhat was the name of the book that you said you read years ago on the Endtimes or Marian messages? Thanks and God bless
@anon3:19pm,
DeleteThank you for your question. The book was called “Trial, Tribulation, & Triumph: Before, During, and After Antichrist” by Desmond A. Birch. It is the most informative and extensive book on eschatology that I have ever seen. I will give you a lengthy response here and hopefully it is helpful to you and others (you made me dig out my book and go through a lot of this. It has been a while!)
There are pros and cons to the book. In my opinion, the pros far outweigh the cons.
CONS:
Birch is a Novus Ordo. His acceptance of the V2 “popes” and the conciliar church will naturally be a deterrent. These are about the only cons that I would include; however, they cannot be minimized as he is looking at some of this through the lens of a false religion that appears to be the True Religion. This is not a personal knock on the man because his research was quite fantastic. It took him 23 years to put this work together, by his own admission.
PROS:
The extensive research that went into the book itself and the vast amount of resources that he pulled from to put this large volume of work together. I would love to see something of this magnitude written by a Sedevacantist. To date, I know of none, but perhaps there is something out there. He cites works such as “Catholic Prophecy” by Yves Dupont, as well as many quotes taken from saints and mystics throughout the centuries.
I will delve into his work as a whole. His eschatological timeline (and the timeline that I personally believe is the most probable) follows from Ven. Bartholomew Holzhauser (and many other saints/mystics) timeline of The 7 Ages (Epochs) of the Church. In it, Birch says that we are in the 5th Age – The Minor Chastisement. It is an era which has immorality, heresy, and wickedness everywhere (no argument there!). It culminates with God chastising the world in many different ways and there are many who perish on the Earth. This is then followed by the 6th Age – The Era (Period) of Peace. A Holy Pope and a Great Monarch (Catholic king) restore order in the Catholic Church and the world and a glorious (Marian) era of peace envelops nearly the entire world. This then is followed by the 7th Age – The Major Chastisement of The Antichrist. The Antichrist (the most wicked man to ever walk the Earth) wreaks havoc on the Earth for 3.5 years, until he is eventually defeated and shortly thereafter, The General Judgment takes place when Christ returns and judges the world.
Birch does a nice job laying out the framework of the 5th, 6th, and 7th ages with events that are supposed to occur in each age. For example, the 5th Age (which we are living through now, if Birch is correct) has many signs that will correspond with it. One event that is mentioned quite often in his book is that civil war will break out in France and Italy almost simultaneously. This will then follow in England. Much of Europe will be thrown into chaos by the Muslims. The Great Monarch is the force that drives them back and starts to win the war for Christ.
CONTINUED…
DeleteThere are other eschatological timelines out there. Introibo, for example, believes the most probable opinion is that Pope Pius XII was the last pope and we will never again have another pope. Things progressively get worse until the Man of Sin (Antichrist) makes his appearance on the Earth and is eventually defeated and Christ then returns. It is similar to Birch’s timeline, minus the Era of Peace. Antichrist is still a wicked man, and the very strong consensus among saints, popes, and approved theologians throughout the centuries is that the Antichrist will be an individual near the end of the world. This timeline could certainly be correct. I personally believe we will see a glorious era through supernatural (not natural) means of a true pope one day coming on the scene; however, Introibo’s opinion could very well be accurate here, as things seem so dismal and a miraculous resurrection of a true papal elect on the horizon does not seem likely from a realistic standpoint. But who knows?
Another scenario is Steve Speray’s eschatological belief that this godless age in which we are living is Antichrist and it will not be an evil man at the end of time. This differs from Birch and Introibo’s view and is the minority opinion, though interesting nonetheless. ***A slight sidebar – I personally found Steve’s work on Guadalupe absolutely fascinating and I know he has mentioned on his blog that he sees Fatima in a less favorable light now. I would be very interested to see him write a work against Fatima. I personally believe in Fatima. I just mean that a work on this particular apparition would be absolutely fascinating. I should mention (to sound redundant): All we need is PUBLIC revelation. Private revelation is not binding and like Introibo, I agree that way too many people (particularly R & R’s) get bogged down by what a particular apparition meant when it could be taken different ways and we should not waste our time trying to decipher (and make others believe) what a particular message meant e.g. “In Portugal, the dogma of the Faith will always be preserved.”***
Back to Birch’s work. He cites many saints and mystics that deserve some mention here.
Before I do that, one thing that Birch mentions is the 3 Days of Darkness prophecy. There are those who disagree that such an event will occur. These people include Introibo, Steve Speray, Fr. Dominic Radecki, etc. I am inclined to agree with these people who believe that such an event will most likely not occur. Their arguments have been quite convincing.
CONTINUED…
DeleteBirch quotes many saints and mystics in his book. There are way too many to name and I could divide them by the 5th, 6th, and 7th Age but that would take too long. I will just cite some here.
*St. Hildegard of Bingen foretold of a comet that would strike the Earth in the far future.
*Ven. Holzhauser said that the 5th Age of the church would begin around 1520 (around Luther) and would end with the arrival of a Holy Pope and a powerful Monarch, who would work with the pope. The Latin Church would be weakened due to it being afflicted with many heresies.
*Sister Jeanne le Royer spoke about how a bunch of wars and disasters would occur on the Earth LONG BEFORE Antichrist makes his appearance at the end of the world. Many other saints corroborate this with them also talking about many calamities occurring on the Earth long before it is time for Antichrist to come on the scene.
*Sr. Emmerick spoke about how towards the end of the world, there would be few fighters for the just cause (Sedevacantism perhaps) because the world would be plunged into heresy and darkness until a great emperor (Monarch) comes on the scene to restore order.
*Anna-Maria Taigi spoke about horrendous chastisements striking the Earth until God intervenes and Peter and Paul miraculously elect a new pope.
*Isabel (Elizabeth) Canori-Mora had nearly identical visions as Taigi, one of which she saw St. Peter miraculous elect a new pope. I think the only difference here is Taigi mentions Ss. Peter and Paul and Canori-Mora mentions just St. Peter, but their visions were nearly identical of what they saw in the future.
Again, I need to mention that some of these saints/mystics mention The 3 Days of Darkness and I have been swayed by Introibo, Speray, and Fr. Radecki that this event will most likely not occur. It is very difficult piecing a lot of this together though. It is like a jigsaw puzzle.
I should mention that many of these mystics were held in VERY high esteem by several popes. Both Taigi and Canori-Mora were held in high regard by several popes, including Leo XII, Pius IX and others. It has been reported in many circles (though some have discredited it) that Canori-Mora was responsible for the cure of Pius IX of his epilepsy in his younger years. Even if not true, he held her in high esteem, as did several popes. Canori-Mora said that she saw Pope Pius VI in Purgatory and he needed prayers to be released. Pope Innocent III and Pope Pius VI are two popes (according to private revelations) that were in Purgatory and needed prayers for their release. I know of no others, but there probably were some. Both Taigi and Canori-Mora foresaw many interesting futuristic events.
*Melanie Calvat (the seeress of La Salette) said, “After a frightful war a Great King will arise and his reign will be marked by a wonderful peace and a great religious revival.”
CONTINUED…
Delete*St. John Bosco sees a pope being mortally wounded in the future, only to be replaced by another holy pope who steers the ship (the Catholic Church) through its many storms with the Eucharist and The Blessed Virgin Mary being the two columns that guide the ship to safety through its many storms. He also foresaw Vatican II causing much chaos in a quote attributed to him 100 years before Vatican II opened.
*Pope St. Pius X said he saw one of his successors taking flight over the bodies of his brethren. He had two visions of a pope (who he feared could have been him) leaving Rome, going into hiding, passing over bodies of dead priests, and finally being killed. (Some could see this as literal or perhaps metaphorical with the damage caused by Vatican II.) It seemed to be a literal vision of a future event and it was not St. Pius X in this vision, but some other future pope. rriorrrior
Then there are also many, many saints quotes as to what Antichrist will be like and what he will do when he arrives on Earth and causes massive destruction.
Birch’s book is very interesting. It is packed with information and the saints and mystics quotes should not be discounted simply because we “need not believe in private revelation”. If these visions/prophecies are legitimate, then certainly God gave them to these individuals as a warning sign to be aware of “the signs of the times” like a good Father would do for his children in warning them of what was to come. Our Lady has also appeared and given messages throughout time to warn The Catholic Church of what would come. Authentic Marian apparitions are rare as Introibo has mentioned on his blog several times (citing only 10 officially approved apparitions by Rome and 7 other apparitions that have implicit approval). They too are intriguing to look into. La Salette, Quito, and Fatima certainly warn of things that were to come in the future. We have to of course put all of this in its proper place. Public Revelation is what we must follow – The Magisterium, Tradition, Scripture, the popes, the ecumenical councils, Canon Law, the unanimous teachings of the Early Church Fathers, the approved theologians, etc. Private revelation (while VERY interesting) can lead one down the wrong path, if one allows it to. But as long as one is strong in the Faith, certainly studying these things can be very beneficial as we are living through incredibly tumultuous times (as we all know).
We should look at the approved theologians who clearly spoke about (some of whom foretold) a lengthy interregnum could (or would) occur – O’Reilly, Dorsch, Cajetan, Bellarmine, Billot, Van Noort, etc.
We should receive the sacraments (those of us near a True Church), pray the rosary daily, wear the Brown Scapular, read the popes, saints and theologians writings, stay close to The Sacred Heart of Jesus and The Immaculate Heart of Mary, and try and be as holy as we can be and stay in a state of sanctifying grace. As long as we do this, we need not fear what tomorrow will bring or what *could* happen because we already know what *is* happening – we are being led down the right path by Jesus and Mary as their faithful Remnant, being guided by the heavenly help that protects His little flock in these dark times.
-TradWarrior
Dear TradWarrior,
DeleteSpeaking for myself, I gave up looking too closely into private revelations a while ago. A lot of them were contradictory, which didn't help one's equilibrium. The closer I looked at Fatima, the less I liked. What was unsettling was to learn that spiritualists/occultists in Portugal itself took out advertisements in at least one major newspaper there, seemingly predicting the Fatima occurrences IN ADVANCE. This has been documented. There are several aspects to Fatima that don't ring true, but I'll leave it at that.
Many years ago, I remember going to a TLM where I knew that many in the congregation were apparitionists. The elderly priest there was aware of that too, so in his sermon he said that too many people were having an unhealthy fixation with the end of the world. He pointed out that the world ends for us when we die, and we should be concentrating on preparing for a happy and holy death above all else. That "pep talk" went down like the proverbial lead balloon.You should have heard how Father S was criticised afterwards!
God bless you
Leo
Dear Leo,
DeleteThank you for your comment. There are a couple of things I want to mention here. In terms of predicting the end of the world, that would be foolish, as only God knows the day and hour. There are some people who go to all sorts of lengths to make date predictions and they always end up being wrong. This can lead people away from God and it is very unhealthy to do and it leads one down a bad path with unnecessary and excessive worry and anxiety, something that God certainly does not want for us. With that being said, God does tell us to be aware of the times in which we live and eschatology, like all branches of theology, is something that is good to study, especially in these times in which we are presently living.
Public revelation is what we are bound to follow, but when the Magisterium says (after careful examination of study) that a private revelation is free from error and safe to follow, there is nothing wrong with that. Again, God allows these types of mystical phenomena to occur for a reason and if it is a warning through His Immaculate Mother, an angel, a saint, etc. then it would be wise to follow them. If private revelation were completely useless, God would never allow such a mystical occurrence to occur. No, He does this because there is a point to all of this in His grand scheme of things.
There are many saints and mystics who were given visions of the future so that mankind would be warned. If anything, it should lead one to want to receive the sacraments more, increase their prayer life, express greater sorrow for their sins and want to atone for them, etc. We cannot map out if Scenario A or Scenario B is completely correct because we do not know, but we do have a partial roadmap that God has given to us, when we try and put the whole picture together.
CONTINUED…I have met Trad priests and Novus Ordo “priests” alike who dismissed all types of talk completely of eschatology and they said, “Let’s just trust in God and not worry about this.” Yes, of course we should trust in God, but eschatology is a branch of theology and it exists for a reason (like all branches of theology – ecclesiology, soteriology, etc.). We should be aware of the “signs of the times” and take notice of what is going on around us. If we just said, “Let’s just trust the Church,” nobody would be a Sedevacantist today and would ignore their God given use of reason when they see the post-conciliar “popes” were teaching something different than the pre-conciliar popes. This is what allowed people to say, “The Novus Ordo religion is a novel religion, and it has broken from Traditional Catholicism.” Without using reason, no one would have used their brains and seen that Roncalli, Montini, et al. were not Catholics and were indeed professing a NEW religion. Again, I have met some clergy and religious (both Sede and Novus Ordo alike) who were so unaware of what was going on in society, it was kind of appalling! When they had no clue that this state law was going to drastically increase the amount of abortions or that this state law was going to push the transgender issue even farther and was going to be horrendous as perverts would share bathrooms with children of both sexes, it was pretty bad. I just came across an itemized checklist where a person has to be listed by their sex. Their choices are A) Male, B) Female, C) Undetermined, or D) Neutral. This is insanity of course, but there are some clergy and religious who are so oblivious to what is going on in society on SO MANY levels that they cannot possibly warn their parishioners because they do not have a clue what is going on themselves in many regards. Seriously, how can they warn their congregation when they themselves are so incredibly clueless as to what is coming? They cannot! I am just reiterating my point here that we need to be aware of the “signs of the times” and look ahead at the bigger picture of where this is all going. Again, I am not trying to equate private revelation here with public revelation. I am just making a point to further illustrate all of this.
DeleteThere are some conservative Novus Ordo’s and R & R’s I know who are definitely apparitionists and they have an unhealthy attachment to private revelation. When I was making the transition to Sedevacantism and I was showing them how this position was the only logical position and the only True position and I was using the various means of public revelation to do so, they would hear none of it. I even used a bit of approved Marian apparitions that supplemented the public revelation sources that I was quoting to show them that Sedevacantism was true. They would hear none of it. They are still R & R’s. I completely and thoroughly demolished them in discussions and debates that I had with them. They no longer talk to me. They still hold to their R & R position, a complete house of cards, because they refuse to come to the True position. They try and find some private revelation to justify why they must be right and I must be wrong, though they cannot do this. It has also led them to become more paranoid, anxious, worrisome, and other things that God does not will for anybody. Private revelation can never be a starting point like public revelation is, but when authentic private revelation is used as a supplement along with public revelation, it can do an incredible amount of good.
God bless you,
-TradWarrior
Interesting commentary. Leo, would you mind mentioning your other doubts re Fatima? I have many as well. If not here, perhaps I can send you an email via Introibo?
DeleteDear Anonymous at 5:25 PM,
DeleteI wish all those doubts could be itemised for you, but my memory has let me down. They should have been committed to writing. Here's one:
Our Lady supposedly said that a greater war than the one then taking place (WW1) would begin during the pontificate of Pius XI. WW2, in fact, broke out during the reign of Pope Pius XII. Another: At the site of the apparitions during the so-called "Miracle of the Sun" some of those present didn't see anything out of the ordinary occur. How come? Then there is the "Fatima Prayer" appended to the Rosary. Why was it inserted, and by whom? The Church did not prescribe it. Then there is the issue of its wording, with various versions floating around. Which, if any, is the correct one? Don't get me going about the "Third Secret"! That is a whole new can of worms in itself. What about: "In Portugal the dogma of the Faith will always be kept". Why the inclusion of "dogma" in that phrase, as opposed to "the Faith" unqualified? What does it actually mean? In any case, Portugal is hardly a stellar example of a Catholic country. It accepted the Novus Bogus revolution with barely a whimper and has become very secularised as well. To my mind, the most telling mystery is how occultists "knew" about Fatima before it even took place. I hope that Steven Speray tells us about his misgivings with Fatima - I'm all ears. Something happened at Fatima, but I don't know exactly what...and I'm not delving into the "Two Lucys" controversy which muddies the waters even further. What a shemozzle! If Introibo allows it, I would be very interested in reading your take on it all.
God bless you,
Leo
Thank you so much Leo! My doubts are all over the place and I too am all ears if Steve Speray writes about it. Just the fact there are "secrets"...why? If BVM wants to warn us, then why need for secrets. Especially since BVM would know what would happen? Freemasons are obsessed with numbers, especially 13. What about the missed apparition in August? Wouldn't BVM know that too?? The children died of the "Spanish flu"...most deaths occurred because of vaccinations, not any flu. Did BVM give any other young children tours of hell? I have read much on that prayer too. Bp Sanborn also said recently not to pray it. If Church approved Fatima, why would we have priests telling us not to pray it? Many things seem off. The NO sect has industries surrounding Fatima and have canonized the young seers. They also canonized the young boy who played Pokémon and is buried in a Nike sweat suit? So much seems suspicious. Many seem obsessed with this apparition so perhaps it just keeps people from learning the true Faith? It is hard to trust news footage etc too as freemasons have controlled media for a long time too. Those are just a few of my unorganized thoughts and doubts. I tend to think things are much worse than we know; such as the evils flowing forth from the Novus Ordo church.
DeleteI'm not an expert on the Fatima apparitions though I find your lack of faith in them disquieting; you stand shoulder to shoulder with the Modernists of the last century who sought to bury these events and to sow doubt in the minds & hearts of the faithful. Speray attacks it does he? What a surprise.
DeleteThe blitzkrieg and Hitler's annexing of neighbouring countries - the inexorable pre-cursor and underwriting of WWII - commenced under Pius XI.
The 'so called' Miracle of the Sun was witnessed by tens of thousands. Yes, some present saw nothing though the vast majority saw a very good deal.
These apparitions could be characterised as 'the return of OL of Good Success (of the Purification, of the Temple)' and in just a short period of time you will have a better understanding of the Third Secret and the 'need for secrets' and why they were deigned to be made public at specified times.
A warning to all you who follow Mr. Speray down the stair-case of doubt: you are on the journey to apostasy.
Dear Anonymous at 11:45 AM,
DeleteYou failed to provide a satisfactory explanation clearing up the doubts I outlined concerning Fatima - they still stand. Maybe someone else can try. I would be grateful. Please don't associate legitimate misgivings regarding Fatima with Modernism. How can having them possibly equate with "the journey to apostasy"? Are we to pretend that the anomalies don't exist, thus doing violence to our intelligence and logic?
The Second World War is regarded as having started when Hitler (and Stalin some time later) invaded Poland in September 1939, Pius XII being on the Chair of Peter at that time. There was no blitzkrieg until said invasion. The precursors were not the War itself.
There was no need to attack Steven Speray. I made reference to him only because TradWarrior said that Mr. Speray had issues concerning Fatima. Any case he has would only be as good as the evidence he proffers in favour of it. As for being a follower, I am hardly that, having read only a very small portion of his output.
How can we be in a position "to have a better understanding of the Third Secret" when we don't even know what the text of the actual Secret is? If you possess this information, please pass it on.
Our Lady of Good Success, pray for us.
Leo
Thanks Leo for replying above. I also don't understand half that note above. How can we be on road to apostasy when we don't even have to believe apparitions to get to Heaven. I wish more people would doubt the Novus Ordo and escape. Glad I doubted it. I now just saw a Novus Ordite on YouTube saying Traditionalism is a heresy. God bless.
DeleteWhat do people think of this person? At around 1 hrs 15 min he mentions Paul 6 freemasonic speech at UN.
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/mOJUhtP7uUM?si=HLDJ1gr32ccI83gr
@anon3:34
DeleteHe makes some good points, but he is a proponent of the Siri Thesis which I think is false.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Something happened in that conclave, and likely the 1963 as well. Siri Thesis or not, something extraordinary happened which established a line of false popes and the Siri Thesis gives a reasonable explanation of how such may have occurred. There's a lot more to it than smoke anomalies (hence the complete interview is over 4 hours long!).
DeleteI am Anon8:16 from earlier. Introibo, do you have any comments about the SSPX consecrations?
ReplyDelete@anon5:37
DeleteIt makes sense that they do. To keep their Apostolic Succession alive, they should consecrate younger bishops. Of the original four Bishops consecrated in 1988, the two oldest went to Judgement within the last two years; Bishop Williamson (d. 2025 just a few weeks shy of 85) and Bishop Tissier de Mallerais (d. 2024 at age 79). That leaves Bishop de Galarreta (who turns 69 this year) and Bishop Fellay (who turns 68 this year).
It is hopeful **IF**
1. They chose priests who are validly ordained and not Vatican II sect "priests" who were not conditionally ordained in the Traditional Rite.
2. They see the truth and (finally) proclaim sedevacantism
Do I think the odds of both coming true is high? No. Then again, all things are possible with God! Pray hard.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Occultism is everywhere. In stores, you can find astrology magazines, even though it has been scientifically proven that there is no connection between the stars and everyday events.
ReplyDelete@anon6:31
DeleteIt is ubiquitous. Hence, the "Occult Invasion" or "Occult Explosion" or "Occult Revival" as I have called it. The more digging I do, the more occult I find. God help us!
God Bless,
---Introibo
Texting with Jesus? What a joke! (Lol)
ReplyDelete-TradWarrior
TradWarrior,
DeleteEven more disturbing--"Texting with Satan"!
God Bless you, my friend,
---Introibo
Two recent posts of (Novus Ordite) Steven O'Reilly are:
ReplyDeletehttp://romalocutaest.com/2025/12/27/the-inevitable-descent-into-schism-and-madness/
https://romalocutaest.com/2026/02/03/sspx-to-consecrate-new-bishops-enough-of-the-nonsense/
The Dec. 27 post deals with all three of the brand new "Snopes Popes" of 2025. There is "Pope" Hildebrand (= so far, an Anonymous); and "Pope" Leo of Mary (= Minutella). Introibo's point of view, made known in his own Sept. 22, 2025 blog post "Holy Orders and Sedevacantism", is that "Pope" Prevost still needs valid episcopal consecration. And so, Fellay and Galarreta could (conditionally) ordain all three as priests (if such needed to be done). And then they could (conditionally or unconditionally) consecrate all three as bishops. The SSPX would get three new bishops. At which point there would also be three SSPX popes. A "triple play".
The first webpage of 9:58 should start https , not http . To copy and paste it won't work without the additional ' s ' . Typos, typos! ... The idea of a "trinity" of SSPX (S)nopes sounds like it would involve some "madness" and "nonsense", to quote from S. O'Reilly's own concluding webpage title words above.
Delete@anon9:58
DeleteThere is way more to do to get a pope than valid orders!
God Bless,
---Introibo
Lefebvre and Fellay arguably were (de facto) SSPX popes. The Wikipedia article "Marcel Lefebvre" has all of his subsequent "Episcopal lineage(s)" listed. The Wiki article "Snopes" shows that Snopes is basically devoted to debunking hoaxes and crazy conspiracy theories. For example:
Deletehttps://www.snopes.com/tag/pope/
has, among many other articles, one devoted to an Impostor Nope Ain't JP2; and another one covering the story about how Donald Trump deliberately publicly posed in early May 2025 as a white-robed USAntipope, thus correctly (!) "predicting" (?!) the real result that happened just days later! This involved some use of "AI" too, which subject is dealt with in the above blog post. I wholeheartedly agree with you, Introibo (and no doubt Steve O'Reilly does too) that "there is way more to do to get a pope than valid orders!"
@anon10:26
DeleteYou're right; SSPX "de facto popes."
God Bless,
---Introibo
You should listen to the latest What Catholics Believe aired several hours ago. Father Jenkins makes great points about the SSPX and the up and coming new bishops, God bless
ReplyDelete@anon10:03
DeleteThank you for the information!
God Bless,
---Introibo
https://youtu.be/TWSYRbM049Y?si=bQJqtPzrwGVmSdug
ReplyDeleteThis was in my feed today...a girl raised in SSPV who left for the Novus Disordo. Sounds like her parents refused to sign document sspv requires not allowing them to go to other sede churches in Cincinnati. Of course, she seems to be ruled by her feelings. So sad so many are which makes the NO so cozy for them.
@anon2:01
DeleteThese kinds of reports are heartbreaking.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Dear Anonymous at 2:01 PM,
DeleteRegarding the link you provided, I decided to read all the comments accompanying the video before watching it. It was noted that those making posts, while undoubtedly quite sincere, sounded so Protestant, giving vent to emotionalism, rather than anything else. Forgetting about the aesthetics of the TLM versus the Bogus Ordo, aren't these people aware of (or have they conveniently forgotten?) the many heresies and errors of the anti-Catholic cult that provides their beloved New Mess? Needless to say, I couldn't be bothered with looking at the actual "testimony" afterwards. It would have been a waste of time, and, to quote Introibo, heart-breaking.
I was reminded of a piece I read many, many years ago of a woman who entered the Catholic Church in England at a time when the Faith was still proscribed. She made it clear that nothing Catholic appealed to her; in fact, she found the Mass and various ceremonies rather off-putting, and as for confessing one's sins to a man - well, the very idea was appalling. Not only that, but many teachings of the Church were very hard to accept. In desperation, the Catholic she was speaking to, asked the lady why she had joined the Church if she was so negative about it. Her reply: "I had no choice, because it was true." Contrast that attitude with what was said in those comments, and presumably on the video itself. Who sounded/sounds more Catholic?
Yours in the Faith,
Leo
Thanks for that comment Leo! I watched most of the testimony and I really could not believe what I was hearing. Her grandparents hosted the catacomb Masses from the onset. It was shocking how little she knew of the True Faith and the host of the podcast did a lot of ooooohhhing and awwwwwwing as this woman was led slowly but surely away from Truth into the feel good religion. I had never heard such a testimony so was interested. I may finish listening today. Whether a novus ordite who escapes the NO or someone like this poor woman, it seems to come down to knowledge of the True Faith, which so few seek.
DeleteOn the issue of the SSPX, from all accounts there is going to be a meeting of the superior general next week with "cardinal" Fernandez to see if things can be worked out. The SSPX are in lala land and is becoming a laughing joke. They have said they will have new bishops by July but they are still trying to see what the Vatican will offer. What a pack of weak, gutless effeminate individuals. Even the resistance group still call Leo their holy father. You must feel sick Introibo when you read this utter garbage.
ReplyDeletePrevost could appoint Card. Orgasm to head the SSPX.
DeleteBreaking news: In response (?!?) to the above word "orgasm", NOW's Mario Derksen just chimed in today in his Feb. 6 blog post "Is It 1988 All Over Again?" as follows:
Delete"The idea of the Vatican's blasphemous porn author... ["Cardinal"] Fernandez being the Unholy See's front man to discuss doctrinal differences and negotiate a way forward with the Lefebvrists is utterly grotesque... If 'Pope' Leo is smart, he will quickly appoint a special envoy to deal with this crisis, someone who understands traditionalism, is not from Argentina, and does not have a career in erotic pseudo-spirituality. Unless, of course, the choice of Fernandez was quite a deliberate one and is to be understood as a provocation..."
https://radicalfidelity.substack.com/p/the-other-lefebvre-and-the-ctm-manifesto
ReplyDeleteDifferent topic, just wondering if you ever came across this article?
Tom,
DeleteNo, I haven't! Thank you for sending it along. I wrote about Bp. Kurz ten years ago:
https://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2016/06/a-forgotten-hero.html
God Bless,
---Introibo
Hi Introibo
ReplyDeleteI agree with the above comment about the SSPX. Going to Rome is going to do nothing. The superior general is indeed in dreamland if he thinks things are going to be worked out. I would love the thoughts of the great TradWarrior. God's blessings
@anon5:02pm,
DeleteThank you for wanting to hear my thoughts. Your title “the great TradWarrior” is very kind, but in actuality, I am no better or worse than anybody else that writes on this blog. But I do appreciate your kindness.
To answer your question, I believe (as I have stated several times before) that the majority of the SSPX will go along with the Novus Ordo religion. If you believe that you can recognize somebody as your leader and then resist him whenever you want, then you are your own authority and will do whatever you please. If you are faced with a decision where you either recognize this man in white and want your group to be recognized by him or you can reject the entire religion altogether and say that there has been no head of the church for decades, more than likely, you will choose the former not the latter, because the latter is “too difficult” for many to do. Those that join the Sedevacantist ranks will certainly be in the minority, not the majority. It is human nature to want to “go along to get along” and this is not a good thing. The SSPX (on the whole) will be absorbed into the “One World Church/Religion” that Pope St. Pius X foresaw over 100 years ago.
God bless you,
-TradWarrior
This is crazy...a NO priest dies suddenly. I suggest looking up the picture of this bizarre incident. I believe these NO deaths are from vaxx and God's wrath. Many of these NOers are dying suddenly. Text from FB below.
ReplyDeleteA Priest Collapses After Returning the Consecrated Host to the Tabernacle
Last Sunday, a profound tragedy unfolded during Holy Mass in Wiesmath, in the district of Wiener Neustadt. The much-loved parish priest, Fr. Raimund Beisteiner, collapsed suddenly while reverently returning the consecrated Hosts to the tabernacle. Despite immediate assistance, he passed away shortly afterward within the church.
This sorrowful moment has deeply shaken the parish community and all who were present. Fr. Raimund was a devoted shepherd, and his sudden passing leaves a great void in the hearts of his faithful, his family, and all who knew him.
We entrust his soul to the infinite mercy of God and humbly ask for prayers for his eternal rest, for comfort for his grieving family and parish, and for all who witnessed this heartbreaking event.
Eternal rest grant unto him, O Lord,
and let perpetual light shine upon him.
I'll have you and everyone else on this blog - including the great Introibo - that the NOers, for whom most here have little else than contempt - are like the Samaritans of old; quite literally. Like the Samaritans, they are the discombobulated and poor bastard children of the Diaspora, the unhappy heirs of the 10 northern tribes.
DeleteAnd yet, our divine Lord, though referring to them as 'dogs' and 'strangers' performed miracles on them, in their midst and, indeed, for them.
The unhappy Samaritans are a pre-shadowing of the Novusordites and God has not forgotten or abandoned them and, as will we all, those here of hardness on heart will will be rewarded in like manner.
Dear Anonymous at 5:56 PM,
DeleteAren't you being a tad uncharitable in claiming that a certain unidentified "you", and most of those who contribute to this blog, treat the "Novusordites" with contempt? Where is the proof? Speaking for myself, I am not conscious of doing anything of the sort and pray to God that I am never guilty of such an offence. As I have stated elsewhere, I know quite a few victims of The Great Apostasy and regard them as much better people than myself. I strongly disagree with the position they are in, but leave judgment of them to Our Lord. At the same time, some are in a state of VINCIBLE ignorance, but, once again, I leave them to God. As for the poor man I label Nope Leo 14 and his fellow disseminators of anti-Catholicism, my prayer is that they die in the state of grace. I certainly do not hate them. An Anglican bishop said it would be a miracle of grace if English Catholics did not harbour ill will to the Church of England (and Anglicans - former Catholics) for having taken their cathedrals and churches from them. I am sure very few would feel that way - likewise "Traddies" vis-à-vis "Novusordites". By the way, I don't intend telling Our Divine Lord any time soon where He should, or should not, be working His miracles.
Oremus pro invicem,
Leo
Thanks for commenting Leo. Very well said. I don't think we have contempt for novus ordites but are just so sad and baffled by them, at least those of us who escaped the NO. I pray daily more eyes are opened. I know many NOers who don't want the Truth on this matter and even a NO priest who knows the NOM is masonic evil and stays. I thought the miracles in the NO are tricks of the devil? To keep them there....and many novus ordites I know confirm this idea.
DeleteMario did a very good article at NOW.
https://novusordowatch.org/2023/11/signs-and-wonders-sedevacantism-no-miracles-objection/
I have contempt for the NO itself, not the poor people fooled in the NO. I send these sermons out to NOers who are open to learning.
DeleteBishop Daniel Dolan: Have Nothing to do with the Novus Ordo Religion
https://youtube.com/watch?v=vPHCBda-YoA&si=OK-cyN2m5jKtJu0X
The Novus Ordo Religion by Rev. Michael DeSaye
https://youtu.be/AllGyUpukVo?si=fK7WthQdHLZeVU3V
Anon @ 5:56
DeleteYou are not correct in your comment when you say the Samaritans are a pre figuration or foreshadowing of the present day Novus Ordites. You state this idea as if it’s unquestionably true, and that if traditional Catholics are justifiably critical of obstinate Novus Ordite heretics and liberal modernists that belong to that ridiculous and phony apostate religion, they are somehow “uncharitable”. The Novus Ordites are similar to the Jews/Pharisees who were once The Chosen people but who killed the prophets and committed Deicide and rejected The Truth, just like the modern day Novus Ordites who have completely rejected The Commandments of God and the dogmatic truths of The Faith. There will be Justice in these final days for The Novus Ordites who stubbornly and pridefully go along with the most horrifying false doctrines and sinful practices of the Vatican II sect. There will be no excuses for not knowing that sodomy is a sin, celebrating and worshipping with demonic false religions, attending sacrilegious masses, thinking divorce, contraception, abortion, and living as a total wordling are fine. It’s not fine. It’s an abomination. All Catholics have a responsibility to uphold and live The Faith no matter what the devil tries to use to tell them otherwise. What happened to those who worshipped the golden calf? Ever hear of Sodom and Gomorrah? How about Noah and the Flood?. Yes, let’s talk about prefiguration and what is to come. So many former Catholics who are now Novus Ordites and Modernists are going to be punished harshly for their rejection of Jesus Christ and His Church if they don’t accept The Truth. They were given the Faith and they became The Chosen People as The Catholic Faithful and they did the same thing as the Jews, and rejected The Truth. The Jews chose worldly power, influence, money, vengeance, subversion, and The Novus Ordites have chosen comfort, Liberalism, human respect, naturalism, going along to get along, French Revolution style “freedom”, and Freemasonic ideals. This is very wicked indeed. Read Matthew chapter 23. “Behold your houses shall be left to you desolate”. No sacraments, fake priests, empty humanistic doctrine, clownish antipopes, and a septic tank of immorality. The Novus Ordites have nothing, and many will be left in their culpable ignorance as divine retribution. The Samaritan to Novus Ordite typology does not work. Yes, we can and should pray for Novus Ordites, but they are willfully rejecting the Truth after they become aware of what this apostate Vatican II sect is all about. It doesn’t take long to come to that conclusion either. It should be almost automatic, intrinsic, since the Novus Ordo Fake Church hatched in the recesses of Hell is beyond repulsive. No more virtue signaling, and talking about blind mercy without Justice. Let’s talk about The End Days and the consequences for apostasy and pertinacious rejection of The Truth and what that brings in the end.
This is the most excellent response! Thank you.
DeleteDear Leo: In response to your intently inquisitive Jan. 31 (at 1:33 & 8:49) comments to me, please allow me to summarize matters by noting that I have never FULLY accepted or endorsed sedeprivationism or Cassiciacum-Related Theses (= CRT). CRT can be utilized and/or interpreted in different ways, some of which I think are correct, and others of which I think are incorrect. From your own CRT Introibo blog comments, it seems to me that you have reduced CRT into merely being either "An elected Nope (much) later morphing into a Pope", or a "Nope = Pope" , thesis. If that is all it could or did amount to, then I would totally reject it, just like you and TradWarrior and others do. In fact, I already did so, in my comment of Nov. 29, 2025 at 11:59PM found under Introibo's "The Gates of Hell..." Nov. 24 post. What is noted there would be much too problematic simply on account of canon and conclave law considerations. I would start out explaining CRT with Sacred Scripture (= in re Samson, and related biblical texts), and then my gut-level suspicion -- as I have no living HUMINT "insider" type of source(s) (yet) -- is that the "lawyerly sounding follow-up" would probably revolve around the subject of supplied jurisdiction on the basis of common error, associated with colored title. Divine intervention (in certain ways) needs to and will precede, whatever be the "lawyer-ese" type of follow-up, to satisfactorily explain the outcome. That said, may God bless you all of Introibo's readers. 777333.
ReplyDeleteDear "777333",
DeleteOh dear, then it's back to the drawing board for yours truly - still no look-in as far as Variant Number One of The Thesis (Guérardian) or Variant Number Two (Sanbornian) are concerned. We have been waiting sixty-seven years now (or is it sixty?), and how many more to come? Bishop Roy, where are you?
God bless,
Leo
So Bishop Roy will resolve our pope problem?
DeleteDear Anonymous at 12:06 AM,
DeleteBishop Roy was mentioned, sort of tongue-in-cheek, with reference to a few comments accompanying the article "Recognizing And Resisting The Errors Of R&R".
Leo
Can someone please advise?! Someone just contacted me asking how to get a prayer card for her family member, whose son committed suicide. I think she is asking for something like you see in the NO where you send cards registering the name of the deceased with some religious group who promises to pray or have masses offered. What traditional route at all is appropriate in this situation? I have no idea what to send this person. This person doesn't understand the NO counterfeit Church at all. They just think I am a Catholic.
ReplyDelete@anon1:56
DeleteThose who commit suicide cannot have the Most Holy Sacrifice offered for them PUBLICLY. Suggestion: Call a Traditionalist priest and ask him if he would be so kind as to offer a Mass PRIVATELY for such individual. You could also ask Traditionalist nuns and/or brothers to offer prayers and sacrifices privately. You can offer a stipend.
Then get a Sympathy Card and let them know that Father X will be offering a private mass or Sister Y will be praying an extra Rosary privately for the repose of the victim's soul.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Thank you so much!
DeleteThe Saints will defeat the Cardinals in the SB tonight.
ReplyDeleteCatholic Saints versus Novus Ordo Cardinals.
DeleteNothing to do with New Orleans and Phoenix.
NFL SB LX result = Seahawks 29, Patriots 13.
Are those teams really playing? Haha
ReplyDeleteAll is predetermined when bread and circuses involved...the globalists set the stage.