Since sodomites cannot reproduce normally ("breeders" is the pejorative term they use for heterosexuals), they need to indoctrinate children directly or indirectly into either acceptance or joining in their sin. They do this primarily through "gay adoption." To ignore the gender component of marriage is to violate God's design of marriage. While it is true the Church has always allowed those who are sterile (through no fault of their own) and the elderly to marry, the fact they cannot procreate does not change the gender component of what a marriage must be like. They still reflect God's design and some can adopt children providing them a father and mother; something sodomites cannot do.
"Alternative families" is the made-up term for perverts making a mockery of God's design for humanity. When children grow up thinking having two women or two men as parents is "normal," they will embrace the sodomite lifestyle as something good. The brainwashing began in the late 1980s. Heather Has Two Mommies, a children's book originally published in 1989, was written by Leslea Newman and tells a story about a young girl who has lesbian "mothers." At Heather's playgroup, her family situation is discussed simply and positively, as are those of other children in normal families. Of course, sodomites can only have children by adopting from an agency, by a sperm donor for sapphists, or by a surrogate for men. Artificial insemination, contrary to both Natural and Divine Positive Law, is looked upon as a "gift." When artificial means are used, at least one person in the relationship is not biologically connected, but an "adoptive parent."
To be clear, artificial insemination is the evil and opposite practice of artificial contraception. God ordained that procreation should take place through natural intercourse in a valid marriage. Artificial contraception removes procreation from the sex act, and artificial insemination removes the act of sex from procreation. This idea must be seen as "good" if sodomites are to gain control of society. Next came Daddy's Roommate is another children's book written by Michael Willhoite and published in 1990, tells the tale of a young boy whose divorced father now lives with his sodomite lover. When the boy asks his mother about his father and his "roommate," the mother explains that they are "gay" and it's just "another wonderful form of love."
It's apparent that children are being brainwashed into accepting unnatural vice, ungodly "families," and the asinine "LGBTQIA+" slogan that "love is love." That idiotic slogan is manifestly false and sick. I love my wife, I loved my parents, I love my best friend, and I love God. The love I have for each is both felt and expressed very differently. If you apply romantic love to your parents, it's not "love is love," it's called "incest" and is morally wrong and mentally sick. Applied to animals, romantic love is beastiality. Applied to children it's pedophilia (which the clergy of the Vatican II sect know all too well--both those in and out of jail). Applied to persons of the same sex, it's homosexuality; which is just as morally depraved, unnatural, sinful, and sick as the other perversions.
A few months back, a new potential client came in to my law firm. He brought his ten year-old son with him. A polite, nice young boy, he seemed rather effeminate in his speech and mannerisms, not at all like his father. The boy went outside my office for some refreshments by the office help, while I interviewed the father. As I opened the door, walking out with the man at the end of our conversation, the boy ran to hug him. "Let's go home, daddy!" I asked him, "Do you want to be an engineer, like your dad, when you grow up?" He responded, "My dad is an architect; my daddy is an engineer!" The man turned to me and said, "He calls me "daddy" and my husband "dad." I nodded my head, and said I had to go. I went straight to the managing partner and told him to give my case to someone else, which he did. It was the first time I had personally met a child being raised by sodomites, and my heart went out to that poor kid.
The damage being done to children and society as a whole is inestimable. The time has come to speak out against "gay adoption" in all its evil forms. Write your legislators about a Constitutional amendment to ban it. God will not ask if we succeeded, only if we sincerely tried.
There are several major talking points; "gay adoption" is to be rejected because :
- same-sex parents have inherently worse relationships than normal parents
- pedophilia significantly increases
- they have problems that make them unfit per se
Each will be examined in turn.
The Unstable Relationships of Unstable People
Homosexuality is a mental disorder. The sodomites claimed a great victory when they prevailed upon the American Psychiatric Association to remove homosexuality from the DSM-II -- its listing of psychological disorders. However, here are the facts regarding homosexual "relationships/marriages." They are both short-lived and full of promiscuity. Even in 2003, studies showed this to be the case:
A recent study on homosexual relationships finds they last 1-1/2 years on average — even as homosexual groups are pushing nationwide to legalize same-sex “marriages.”
The study of young Dutch homosexual men by Dr. Maria Xiridou of the Amsterdam Municipal Health Service, published in May in the journal AIDS, mirrors findings of past research.Among heterosexuals, by contrast, 67 percent of first marriages in the United States last at least 10 years, and researchers report that more than three-quarters of married people say they have been faithful to their vows.
Same-sex “marriage” has gained new attention since a Supreme Court decision last month struck down state laws against homosexual behavior. Conservative activists say they expect the state Supreme Court in Massachusetts to rule this weekend on whether to recognize homosexual “marriages.”
The Dutch study — which focused on transmission of HIV — found that men in homosexual relationships on average have eight partners a year outside those relationships.
Earlier studies also indicated that homosexual men are not monogamous, even when they are involved in long-term relationships. In “The Male Couple,” published in 1984, authors David P. McWhirter and Andrew M. Mattison report that in a study of 156 males in homosexual relationships lasting anywhere from one to 37 years, all couples with relationships more than five years had incorporated some provision for outside sexual activity.
“Fidelity is not defined in terms of sexual behavior but rather by their emotional commitment to each other,” the authors said. “Ninety-five percent of the couples have an arrangement whereby the partners may have sexual activity with others.”
Such findings show how recognition of same-sex unions would “erode the ideal” of traditional marriage, Pete LaBarbara, senior policy analyst at Concerned Women for America’s Culture and Family Institute.
“They’re redefining what it means to be monogamous,” Mr. LaBarbara said. “It’s just preposterous to claim that these relationships even approximate normal, steady relationships.”
(See washingtontimes.com/news/2003/jul/11/20030711-121254-3711r).
More alarming facts:
- 28% of homosexual men had more than 1000 partners: "Bell and Weinberg reported evidence of widespread sexual compulsion among homosexual men. 83% of the homosexual men surveyed estimated they had had sex with 50 or more partners in their lifetime, 43% estimated they had sex with 500 or more partners; 28% with 1,000 or more partners. Bell and Weinberg p 308."
(See exodusglobalalliance.org/ishomosexualityhealthyp60.php)
- 79% of homosexual men say over half of sex partners are strangers: "The survey showed 79% of the respondents saying that over half of their sexual partners were strangers. Seventy percent said that over half of their sexual partners were people with whom they had sex only once. Bell and Weinberg pp.308-309."
(See exodusglobalalliance.org/ishomosexualityhealthyp60.php)
- Modal range for homosexual sex partners 101-500: "In their study of the sexual profiles of 2,583 older homosexuals published in Journal of Sex Research, Paul Van de Ven et al. found that "the modal range for number of sexual partners ever [of homosexuals] was 101–500." In addition, 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent had between 501 and 1000 partners. A further 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent reported having had more than 1000 lifetime sexual partners. Paul Van de Ven et al., "A Comparative Demographic and Sexual Profile of Older Homosexually Active Men," Journal of Sex Research 34 (1997): 354."
(See exodusglobalalliance.org/ishomosexualityhealthyp60.php)
Does anyone with any sense of decency want a child living with such a "couple"?
Homosexuality and Pedophilia
- Over 90% of child molesters are male
- 25-40% of molestations are same-sex, far in excess of the percentage of homosexuals
- 43% of sex between teachers and pupils is homosexual
- 50% of sex between foster parents and foster children is homosexual
- In a study of 21 "group home" sex scandals — 71% were homosexual
- Of those who commit incest: Homosexual parents — 18%; Heterosexual parents — 0.6%
(See Freund K, Watson RJ (1992) "The proportions of heterosexual and homosexual pedophiles among sex offenders against children: an exploratory study." Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 18:34-43).
In the U.S. and Canada, the North American Man-Boy Love Association marches proudly in many "gay pride parades" with the stated goal of removing the barriers to man-boy sex. Note the phrases they use are removal of “oppression towards pedophilia” and gaining the “liberation of pedophilia.” It is clear that those who advocate the legalization of sex between adults and children intend to argue that such conduct is a “civil right,” deserving of the same legal protections afforded to racial and ethnic minorities. The Vatican II sect is complicit in this goal, and covers up the obvious connection between homosexuality and molestation.
Even as I write this post, "transgenders" are breaking down the last rationale society holds for rejecting pedophilia, i.e., the child cannot consent. However, children who think they are members of the opposite sex are now being allowed by parents to dress, act, and even mutilate themselves with drugs and surgery to become "who they really are" because it's allegedly "in their best interests." So who needs consent? We make children eat healthy food and get vaccinated without consent, so if my child feels attracted to a man at 7 or 8 years old, it might be in his "best interest" to have a sexual relationship with that man; even if the man is "dad" or "daddy" in a sodomite relationship.
God help us.
Homosexuality and Mental/Physical Problems
Sodomites have a multitude of mental and physically problems that are disproportionately higher than any other group.
Even the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association (GLMA) has noted these problems. For example, among men who identify as homosexual:
- Problems with body image are more common among gay men, and gay men are much more likely to experience an eating disorder such as bulimia or anorexia nervosa.
- Gay men use substances at a higher rate than the general population, and not just in larger cities. These include a number of substances ranging from amyl nitrate ("poppers"), to marijuana, Ecstasy, and amphetamines.
- Depression and anxiety appear to affect gay men at a higher rate than in the general population. . . Adolescents and young adults may be at particularly high risk of suicide . . .
- Gay men use tobacco at much higher rates than straight men, reaching nearly 50 percent in several studies.
(See Robert J. Winn, “Ten Things Gay Men Should discuss with Their Healthcare Provider,” GLMA, May 2012).
The federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration has reported the following distressing facts concerning women who identify themselves as practicing lesbians:
- Among adults, a study that examined the risk of psychiatric disorders among individuals with same-sex partners found that, during the previous 12 months, women with same-sex partners experienced more mental health disorders—such as major depression, phobia, and post-traumatic stress disorder—than did women with opposite sex partners
- Another study “found that lesbian and bisexual women who were ‘out’ experienced more emotional stress as teenagers and were 2 to 2.5 times more likely to experience suicidal ideation in the past 12 months than heterosexual women. Meanwhile, lesbian and bisexual women who were not ‘out’ were more likely to have attempted suicide than heterosexual women.”
- “Studies have found that lesbians are between 1.5 and 2 times more likely to smoke than heterosexual women.”
- “A number of studies have also suggested that lesbians are significantly more likely to drink heavily than heterosexual women.”
(See Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Top Health Issues for LGBT Populations Information & Resource Kit. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 12-4684. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2012, C1-2).
Homosexuality and the Mortality Rate:
A study was conducted in Vancouver British Columbia and published in 1997 in the International Journal of Epidemiology (Vol. 26, 657-61: http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/26/3/657).
Pro-sodomite researchers actually tried to debunk the assertion that homosexuality is infested with disease and shortens the life expectancy of both male sodomites and lesbians. Despite their attempts to downplay the practical consequences of their research, it is difficult to ignore that the study concluded with the statement that "under even the most liberal assumptions, gay and bisexual men in this urban center [Vancouver, BC] are now experiencing a life expectancy similar to that experienced by all men in Canada in the year 1871." Much to their chagrin, the study revealed "life expectancy at age 20 years for gay and bisexual men is 8 to 20 years less than for all men."
In addition to all these problems, what sodomites do in private is so contrary to nature, there can be no doubt they are seriously mentally disturbed and should never be left alone with children.
Warning! The following section contains graphic descriptions of perverted behavior, and may be found too disturbing for some to read. Reader discretion is strongly advised.
Homosexual Practices:
- Anal sex (sodomy properly so-called) is practiced by 80% of homosexuals. Tearing or bruising of the anal wall is common, and opens the body to reception of germs through the rectum. According to J.R. Daling, et. al, "Correlates of Homosexual Behavior and the Incidence of Anal Cancer," Journal of the American Medical Association 247, no. 14 (April 9, 1982) the risk of anal cancer soars by 4000% among those who engage in anal intercourse. Anal sex also raises the risk of rectal prolapse, perforation that can go septic, chlamydia, cryptosporidiosis, genital herpes, gonorrhea, viral hepatitis B and C, as well as syphilis
- Rimming is the practice of licking and stimulating the anus of another. The amount of fecal matter consumed, and exposure to disease is significant over time
- Golden showers is the practice of urinating on the other person. About 20% of sodomites regularly drink and bathe in their partner's urine
- Fisting is the practice of inserting the hand (and sometimes the arm up to the elbow, or further) into the partner's rectum. Many sodomites have the sphincter muscles so weakened they soil themselves. (See Darling cited above)
- Scat Sports involves ingesting your partner's feces and/or rubbing it all over the face and body
- Toys is the term used for inserting objects into the rectum. Most commonly used are gerbils, placed in plastic and inserted in the rectum until the animal suffocates and dies. The thrashing of the poor creature gives the sodomite his perverse pleasure.
Normal behavior? Not prone to hurt others (or themselves)? Think again. Can you imagine a child walking in on his adoptive parents performing one of these acts? Lord, have mercy.
Objections
Pro-sodomite adoption advocates point to certain studies that seem to justify letting homosexuals be adoptive parents. Cornell University has this published:
Overview: We identified 79 scholarly studies that met our criteria for adding to knowledge about the well-being of children with gay or lesbian parents. Of those studies, 75 concluded that children of gay or lesbian parents fare no worse than other children. While many of the sample sizes were small, and some studies lacked a control group, researchers regard such studies as providing the best available knowledge about child adjustment, and do not view large, representative samples as essential. We identified four studies concluding that children of gay or lesbian parents face added disadvantages. Since all four took their samples from children who endured family break-ups, a cohort known to face added risks, these studies have been criticized by many scholars as unreliable assessments of the well-being of LGB-headed households. Taken together, this research forms an overwhelming scholarly consensus, based on over three decades of peer-reviewed research, that having a gay or lesbian parent does not harm children. (See whatweknow.inequality.cornell.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-wellbeing-of-children-with-gay-or-lesbian-parents. Emphasis mine).
As one can see, I put this nonsense in the same category as the lies about COVID and the alleged efficacy about COVID vaccines. What genuine researchers/scientists do not consider "...large, representative samples as essential"? On this basis we are supposed to consider "children of gay or lesbian parents fare no worse than other children"?
Many governments of the world have condemned human cloning, by comparison, because of, among other things, potentially detrimental emotional and psychological consequences for those who would be cloned. If we can prohibit cloning with no prior studies conducted on clone subjects, based simply on common sense and fear of what might happen, how much more should we refrain from experimenting on our children, for fear of similar consequences? No run of inadequate studies will make up for the lives that would be damaged if we are wrong.
Some people may raise the objection that because the tests are inconclusive, reliable studies need to be conducted as soon as possible. One then can counter by inquiring as to whose children we are to use as guinea pigs. We are dealing with a group in which gross promiscuity, pedophilia, AIDS, suicide, and instability are known factors. The suggestion appears to be one more likely entertained in a barbarous rather than a civilized culture.
Conclusion
When discussing "gays" having children by artificial means or adopting a child outright, it is important to recognize that the highest good, or the child’s best interest, is not necessarily having parents, but having well-being itself. The two do not necessarily amount to the same thing. We would be loathe, for example, to grant a child to a known pedophile simply for the sake of supplying a parent figure. In light of the aforementioned data, we must face the very real possibility that having children growing up in same-sex homes will lead to incalculable harm both to the children and society.
The governments of the world must ban sodomites from adopting or raising children conceived by unnatural means. It may already be too late, as those who commit the vilest sins against God and nature have begun raising the next generation. Pity those children who will grow up mentally, physically, and spiritually damaged having been turned against God from the beginning of their lives, and will bring down what's left of Christian society even faster.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteSimon,
DeleteI understand what you meant but I don't think you explained it quite right in the first paragraph. It would be the heresy of Monophysitism to say the Son of God was ONLY a divine person and not human. He had two natures. He was human and divine.
Lee
Okay, Lee. I deleted my comment and will repost it without the first paragraph. I'm not as theologically knowledgeable as Introibo so I don't want to post errors against the faith.
DeleteWe see the terrible effects of apostasy: what was once considered evil has become good. The world has driven God out of public life and taken His place, and the V2 sect, which is reconciled to the world, approves of sodomite relationships and "gay adoption". We live in a time of great moral and spiritual darkness, and the punishment of Sodom and Gomorrah is likely to be mild compared to the plagues that will descend on this wicked world ! May God have mercy on us !
DeleteSimon,
DeleteYou are a very humble man and it is appreciated. Many people can learn from that including myself. Continue making solid comments.
Lee
Simon,
DeleteSaying he is a divine person is correct. What would be incorrect would be to say that Jesus only has one Divine nature when He had two. Very sorry for the confusion.
Lee
Truly God and truly Man, that's the way to put it.
DeleteThis is a much needed article! Thank you!!!
ReplyDeleteJohn,
DeleteThank you, my friend and guest poster!
God Bless,
---Introibo
I love your comments Simon. As you know, Saint Joseph was more of a true father to Jesus, than the typical "stepfather" in that our Lord was born into a family with married parents where no other man was involved in His conception. There was not another man who was His biological Father.
ReplyDeleteYour point is well taken. It is apples and oranges. Our Lord's earthly parents were a married couple, legitimately, i.e. male and female.
Fathers (good fathers) aré essential to the upbringing of a child. It doesnt matter how nice your lesbian "mums" aré, they can not give you what a good father can
ReplyDeletePoni,
DeleteAbsolutely correct! Also two "dads" deprive a child of a good mother.
God Bless,
---Introibo
To justify "homoparenting", we're often told that children need love. That's true, but a father doesn't love his child in the same way as a mother. The child needs the sexual difference of both parents, as well as psychological differences.
DeleteSimon,
DeleteYou understand the situation. Unfortunately, most don't, and many who do are not on God's side of the issue!
Thank you for your always great comments. They keep me writing!
God Bless,
---Introibo
Keep writing ! Your work is indispensable in exposing the true Faith and combating the heresies of the V2 sect and the errors of the modern world. God bless you !
DeleteSimon,
DeleteThank you, my friend!
God Bless,
---Introibo
Introibo,
ReplyDeleteThank you for presenting this information. Fake conservatives cheer this on.
If anyone reads about the sexual behaviors listed above and is not shocked, I have another one for you – “shrimping”. I will not describe it here. Perhaps you want to shock someone that needs shocking. Have them look it up. It is so disgusting that when I first heard about it years ago, it got seared into my memory. So, don’t look it up unless you feel you need to. I am sure there are many other deviant behaviors, limited only by the imagination and demonic influence.
Do people remember the “We’re coming for your children” song from the San Francisco gay men’s choir a few years ago? Disturbing. I think it did get some coverage, but how many have forgotten?
Today, even the Mayo clinic concedes the additional mental health problems they have, as well as increased rates of partner violence. Yet another reason to protect children from them.
God Bless,
-S.T.
Seeking Truth,
DeleteYes, that's yet another deviant behavior. You also make the good point that some "conservatives" see them as "normal." No child should be left around a sodomite--Period.
God Bless,
---Introibo
I believe it is correct to say that Jesus is a Divine Person with two natures. Divine and human.
ReplyDeleteOur Lady is the Mother of God, not because She gave birth to a nature, but because She gave birth to a Person. A Divine Person.
Hopefully Intriobo will come on and clarify. It is extremely easy to err on these issues and I will gladly be corrected if what I state above is wrong.
John,
DeleteSee my response to you below--you're correct as per usual!
God Bless,
---Introibo
Thank you for all do Intriobo.
DeleteVampires, in legend/myth, are demonic entities that feed off their victims lifeblood, promising freedom and power, but presenting, instead, thralldom and insatiable hunger. Vampires cannot, in legend, feed upon anyone who does not invite them in, generally the weak and needy. They cannot reproduce on their own, so they need "converts", a constant supply of fresh blood.
ReplyDeleteSodomites and usurers are like vampires. They both make some pretty intense promises, but the reality is thralldom and insatiable hunger. They prey upon the weak and needy, and are constantly in need of "fresh meat" because they cannot reproduce. Perhaps the myth of vampires is based on sodomites...
@anon3:33
DeleteSodomites are surely parasitic, to be certain! As to vampires, they also fear the Crucifix and all things holy.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Sodomites (specially those who are predatory) are like the xenomorphs from alien franchise
Delete@anon9:35
DeleteExcept the sodomites are more ugly in their sin-filled souls.
God Bless,
---Introibo
To be perfectly clear I believe it would be incorrect to say Jesus is a human Person. He is a Divine Person only, with a Divine and human nature. He is God and man, but He is not a human person. Please correct me if I am wrong intriobo.
ReplyDeleteJohn,
DeleteYou are correct. According to theologian Ott:
"The dogma asserts that there is in Christ a Person, who is the Divine Person of the Logos, and two natures, which belong to the One Divine Person." (See "Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma, [1955], pg. 144).
Therefore your statement: " believe it would be incorrect to say Jesus is a human Person. He is a Divine Person only, with a Divine and human nature. He is God and man, but He is not a human person." is spot on correct!
God Bless,
---Introibo
So to say that Jesus had two fathers, as those who want to justify "homoparentality" do, is a mistake ?
DeleteSimon,
DeleteAbsolutely! The First Person of the Blessed Trinity is His Father from eternity. St. Joseph was his Foster Father. In no way does this compare to sodomite "families."
God Bless,
---Introibo
Sorry I brought it up earlier in the comments. I don't think I explained myself quite right either. Somebody could misunderstand that Jesus was a divine human person without making the distinction that he is one person with two natures. Bergoglio taught that Jesus was a divine human person some time ago and it made me think to bring it up. Therefore the correct way to put it is Jesus is a divine person with TWO natures (human and divine).
DeleteLee
Lee,
DeleteI love your posts whether here or Novus Ordo Watch, I only wish you posted more.
Your friend in Christ and
His Most Holy Mother,
John
Thank you John. That was a nice compliment. Lately I haven't been able to think of anything.
DeleteLee
Thank You , Thank You very much for another outstanding writing on this subject .
ReplyDeleteI have noticed in recent years how all the gay agenda is pushed on public tv in childrens programs . Even the ads have two men or two women with children going to the park for a picnic ,etc
I have no doubt we are in the End Times .How much more Lord will you take.
One True Faith
Brisbane, Australia
One True Faith,
DeleteI can't say it enough:
The two greatest perils in the Great Apostasy (aside from the Church driven underground) are 1. sodomites and 2. the occult.
Both grow stronger by the day. God help us!
God Bless,
---Introibo
Introibo:
DeleteDo you believe that abortion is a great peril?
@anon4:47
DeleteNot in the same sense. Abortion is the murder of an innocent unborn human being and is also one of the Four Sins that Scream to Heaven for Vengeance.
As such, abortion is a great evil, but not a great peril (danger). The occult and sodomites recruit and are tremendously successful. Planned Parenthood (Banned Parenthood) cannot claim such to nearly the same degree. Furthermore, the occult and sodomites are a driving force behind abortion. I have NEVER once known a sodomite or occultist who was pro-life.
God Bless,
---Introibo
The present time looks like the End Times, indeed ! Sometimes I think the days of the Antichrist are near, and there are unmistakable signs that we're almost there. The world and the V2 sect are active in preparing for his coming. May God have mercy on us !
DeleteSimon,
DeletePraying for mercy everyday in this wicked world is a necessity--esp. the Rosary!
God Bless,
---Introibo
Introibo
ReplyDeleteWhat books do you suggest one read concerning the dangers of the occult?
@anon12:11
DeleteTwo indispensable works that should be read to begin are
"Occult Phenomena in the Light of Theology" by theologian Wiesinger, and "The Devil: Does He Exist and What Does He Do?" by theologian Delaporte.
God Bless,
---Introibo
This is purely anecdotal, but I recall someone once making the point that the sheer amount of intestinal parasites present in homosexuals as a result of their fornication had an influence on the utter promiscuity and degeneracy within their sub-population (similar to how certain parasites rewire insects to behave in ways harmful to the host that would enable the parasites to spread).
ReplyDeletePart of this anecdote referred to how a gay family member of the person who made the above hypothesis took Ivermectin during the days of the Covid pandemic, which (being an anti-parasitic drug among other things) resulted in them passing an enormous amount of dead parasites in their stool. After this, their homosexual inclinations all but vanished.
Would be an interesting reason as to why the mass media was so desperate to suppress Ivermectin back in 2020!
This is very interesting. Thanks for commenting.
Delete@anon6:13
DeleteI have never heard of this nor have I researched it. While it may be true (as I have not looked into it), I seriously caution you to get solid sources showing this to be the case. All you have is anecdotal evidence which is always weak evidence. If it is true, please let me know with citations, I'd love to post on it.
Until you vet this, please don't discuss it. We have enough on sodomites to show them to be dangerous. Telling something that may be false will only make our position look foolish and incredulous.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Introibo:
ReplyDeleteYou have said that an intersex person can participate at a traditional Catholic chapel as much as any lay person.
Could an intersex person participate at a traditional Catholic chapel in gender specific activities?
For example a male as an altar server, or a female at a women's event?
@anon7:56
DeleteI have not found anything pre-Vatican II which deals with this topic (it is very rare). An intersex child is usually given genetic tests to determine which gender they would be most comfortable with growing up.
Personally, I see nothing against an intersex person who tested genetically male from being an altar boy, or tested female from attending a women's event.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Can one say that a single Y chromosome means a male, that would obviously show that there is no such thing as truly intersex people, and even if one has xxxxxxxxxxxxxy chromosomes they would still be a man, also it would definitely seem that an “intersex” (I hate that word as it implicitly denies that there are only 2 sexes) male would be barred from the priesthood as it would cause grave scandal
DeleteObviously klinefelter shouldn’t cause grave scandal though as most of them look like regular men
Delete@anon9:53
DeleteIn my opinion as a layman, I think you are correct.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Introibo:
DeleteIt would seem that the catechism of Trent says that they would be barred:
“Finally, those who are notably maimed or deformed should not be admitted. A defect or deformity of this kind cannot but offend the eye and stand in the way of the due administration of the Sacraments.”
(http://www.catholicapologetics.info/thechurch/catechism/Holy7Sacraments-Orders.shtml)
I think this would fall under the category of “notably deformed
@anon11:00
DeleteThat citation deals specifically with Holy Orders. Not all intersex are "notably deformed." I maintain that intersex are barred from Holy Orders as ordination could be invalid. Would the Catechism apply to anything else/more? Perhaps. Without Magisterial guidance, I cannot say for sure!
God Bless,
---Introibo
We know that the V2 sect approves of sodomy, so much so that some Novus Ordo prelates, probably sodomites themselves, call those who condemn this unnatural sin mentally ill ! How crazy ! Rome has lost its faith and become the new Sodom !
ReplyDeletehttps://novusordowatch.org/2013/08/v2-bishop-homophobes-sick/
Simon,
DeleteIntroibo's article is in perfect timing with the one you posted. The blasphemy and affronts to God these days are building up high like the tower of Babel. It's no wonder everybody is so confused. May His mercy be upon us.
Lee
Another post I read this morning on Novus Ordo Watch. This man has the audacity to compare sodomite relations with the Eucharist... What blasphemy !
Deletehttps://novusordowatch.org/2024/09/radcliffe-homosexual-desire-is-god-given/
When you think that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed because their inhabitants indulged in unnatural acts, you can't help but find it frightening to hear the V2 sect endorse sodomy ! God's wrath hangs over this wicked world !
Simon,
DeleteBlasphemous in the extreme.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Hi Introibo,
ReplyDeleteI would suggest not using the term homosexual when discussing topics like this as it is term coined by a sodomite activist who was trying to build a scientific foundation on which to build activism for a rights-based movement which did eventuate. He also coined the term heterosexual against which the concept of homosexual was to be juxtaposed. As you can imagine, it was not a scientific exercise but a linguistic one and as the science has subsequently shown there is no biological basis for the existence of these invented categories.
In regards to HIV the available scientific evidence doesn't favour the existence of HIV as a distinct entity and certainly not one that is transmissible as shown by studies conducted over a the period of decade that showed zero "transmission" amongst a large cohort of natural (non-sodomitic) monogomous couples.
AIDS is also not a disease, but a group of diseases that are associated with the use of amyl nitrite inhalers, needle use and sodomitic activities. There is no scientific evidence (evidence obtained using the scientific method with properly controlled experiments) for the existence of highly contagious virus called HIV being the cause of health problems in sodomites, or any other population. Like the term homosexual itself, it is a branding exercise. To learn see Dr Sam Bailey's narrated version of "the Ying & Yan of HIV" by the Perth group which can still be found through brave search or on her odysee channel. The treatments and cures for HIV/AIDS are as deadly as those for COVID-19. Indeed the latter followed a similar playbook when it comes to the pseudoscience behind it.
Studies have shown much higher rates of domestic partner abuse in sodomitic relationships including higher levels of physical violence. People simply aren't meant to live this way. God certainly withdraws his grace from those who fall into this trap of Satan.
It is important to note that many of the people who are trapped in this sin have come from backgrounds of childhood sexual abuse themselves. Others were raised by narcissistic parents who didn't show them unconditional love as children and whose unmet emotional needs became sexualised when they hit puberty, often in the wrong direction. These people aren't to blame for their feelings but they need to understand the root of them and reframe what they actually mean rather than the false interpretation Satan is trying to give them.
The same thing happens with "gender identity" during puberty. Most adolescents go through difficult times and well over 90% resolve any incongruence by the time they reach adulthood. But Satan wants the child to believe that their feelings are their identity, that this is stable and have them mutilate their bodies in order to render them infertile and permanently broken. As with all problems, the right kind of early intervention will lead to better outcomes, but satanists are determined that the opposite must happen.
The third group of people who end up engaging in sodomitic activity are those who engaged in repeated wicked behaviour and were left by God to their depravity. It is a punishment for their sins.
The devil traps people in these sins by tricking them into believing that their feelings and behaviours are part of their core identity and that they cannot change. Feelings can be reinterpreted and behaviour are malleable in the long term. It might not be easy in the short term, but continuing on that path is a ticket to eternal and physical death.
@anon7:21
Delete1. You are correct that the word "homosexual" was coined by Karl Ulrichs (a sodomite) and Karl Kertbeny (also a sodomite). They were among the first to advance "rights" for perverts. I do use the word sodomite. However, the word homosexual is firmly established in the modern lexicon and cannot be avoided in polite company and in the workplace. I will not use the term "gay" or other politically correct monikers.
When addressing clients or presenting papers to a court of law, if the subject needs to be mentioned, my use of sodomite would get me held in contempt of court. I could also lose my law license.
In common discourse, people who may be open to the Christian view will quickly shut you out and refuse to listen if the word sodomite is used. Homosexual is an acceptable term to try and win a convert against sodomite rights.
In my blog, I use it for reasons of word choice and that we still need to utilize it. Most people are unaware of the origin of the word, and actually think it's crass not to use "gay."
2. I am not convinced by the minority scientific view that HIV does not cause AIDS, or that AIDS does not exist. The most prominent voice for such was Dr. Peter Duesberg, a molecular biologist, now in his late 80s. He wrote the book "Inventing the AIDS Virus" in 1996.
I remain open to the view, but as of this writing, I am not convinced of it.
3. I also believe that acts against nature are learned and not genetic. It wouldn't make a difference, however. If it was discovered that some people are genetically predisposed to violence or alcoholism, it doesn't make the behavior morally good or excuse one from having to abstain from their desires.
I will not venture as to exactly how to get out of the sodomite lifestyle--but it begins and ends with God's grace and quality professional help from Christians.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Introibo:
DeleteHIV/AIDS can be transmitted by heterosexual activity, as well as by non-sexual means, such as by infected blood transfusions.
@anon7:30
DeleteThat is correct. However, AIDS is disproportionally high among sodomites and spread by them more than other means. The "innocent victim" was used by sodomites to push their agenda of funding AIDS as opposed to cancer and other more dangerous diseases that affect far more people.
I'm thinking of Ryan White, the young boy hemophiliac who contracted AIDS via blood given him. He died at 18 in 1990, and was used shamelessly by sodomites to fundraise. Who wouldn't want to help these poor innocent victims? Two sodomites engaging in unnatural acts would not get any sympathy at that time.
Notorious sodomite Elton John, used the boy to "raise awareness of AIDS" John dedicated his song "Skyline Pidgeon" to Ryan White after his death.
Sodomites will promote their cause at all cost and use others shamelessly to get what they want.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Hi Introibo,
DeleteYou hold beliefs in this area that have been placed in your mind by longstanding media propaganda campaigns that are reminiscent of those used with COVID-19 but decades earlier, and "science" education. It is only when you critically look at the "science" that one realises that a) it doesn't follow the scientific method and b) it isn't even logically consistent.
For example, antibodies are supposed to protect someone from disease. This is the entire basis of the idea of vaccination in which the injection of a foreign substances, including an "antigen" is supposed to generate specific antibodies that protect you from a disease. But with HIV antibodies are a determinant of whether you are infected with an infectious agent and are not protective. Furthermore antibodies for HIV cross-react with antibodies for many other substances. It turns out so-called antibody are promiscuous reacting with an indeterminate number of different proteins. And with COVID-19 you still need to get the jab even if you are shown to have "protective" and "specific" antibodies in your bloodstream - it doesn't count this time.
The reality is antibodies have never been directly observed by scientists. Rather their existence was thought up to explain non-specific chemical reactions and these same reactions are then used to infer the presence of antibodies. It is circular reasoning at its worst. The existence of antibodies was actually disproven in 1942, and yet the theory was kept in play because it is a foundation of the vaccination raquet https://mikestone.substack.com/p/merrill-chase-inadvertently-disproved
Indeed neither antibody theory nor the field of virology follow the scientific method in their experiments, which by definition makes them pseudoscientific.
https://mikestone.substack.com/p/viroliegy-101-the-scientific-method
https://mikestone.substack.com/p/viroliegy-101-logical-fallacies
When you learn that Pasteur developed germ theory after reading the Talmud https://www.jewishpress.com/sections/features/features-on-jewish-world/louis-pasteur-the-jewish-connection/2020/07/29/
And then learn that it was also divorced from the scientific method a long time ago and was falsified as a hypothesis then you begin to see the state of play. https://mikestone.substack.com/p/the-germ-hypothesis-part-1 https://mikestone.substack.com/p/the-germ-hypothesis-part-2
It would be prudent for you to look into these matters, because everyone is being sold deadly snake oil that kills. There are many spiritual threats in this world, but the real threats are bad ideas backed by billionaire philanthropists who just happen to also be eugenicists.
House of Numbers is an award-winning documentary (it won people's choice awards at many prominent US film festivals) exposing the inconsistencies of the HIV-AIDS story. I would encourage you to watch it. Those who label it a "denial" film should recognize that it is the big lies that hide in plain sight.
PS: HIV-AIDS is complex because they've grouped a number of diseases as a syndrome.
DeleteIf you'd like a simple understanding of the quality of the science and who is funding it, this short and entertaining 20-minute video on West-Nile Virus is characteristic of the widespread practices in use in virology:
https://youtu.be/WoARDRCwo5Y
I'd encourage you to look into this issue because pseudoscience is being used to control and harm populations around the world and it needs to be called out for the bunk that it is. It may not be of the faith, but it could keep the faithful safe from physical harm.
It seems Dr Sam also has a short video summary on antibodies and immune theory: https://youtu.be/xm0FAqKbWGA that may be helpful to you.
DeleteYou are wasting your time. Intro doesn't care
Delete@anon1:35 to @9:28
DeleteThank you for the information. It's not that I don't care, it's that this blog will remain dedicated to matters of faith and morals not controversial issues that have, in my opinion, no immediate impact on Traditionalists, such as 9/11, the moon landing, Bigfoot, etc. Everyone can do the research and make up their own minds. My focus is exposing the Vatican II sect first and foremost.
God Bless,
---Introibo
@anon - thank you for supplying this information.
Delete2 things - although I think most would agree that there are many evil things going on in medicine and science and that we are lied to about a great many things, what are we to do with this information, as in what is the point? Is the solution from Dr. Sam and others just terrain theory and take care of your body? Be wary of drugs and treatments you may not need? 2nd point. Although this is a big deal, the most important thing is in fact spiritual threats. The safety of our souls comes first, not our bodies, which is not to say that we need to take care of our bodily health.
@anon6:58
DeleteYou're spot on with your comment.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Thank you. I was in a rush and forgot to sign.
DeleteI sincerely would like @anon1:45's input. We must constantly appraise the value of things. What you write may all be true, but if there is no practical value for us, then we shouldn't spend too much time on it.
God Bless,
-S.T.
We are body and soul. We should know about risks to both, especially in relation to those who are dependent upon us and whose welfare we are responsible for. The soul must always come first but it is dependent on the body and Satan wants to destroy both.
DeleteFrom a theological point of view it is also important to look at these things. Satan’s forces promise a world free of disease with their interventions. It is a false promise because disease and illness are a consequence of original sin. The practical consequences of believing their false promise is actually more disease and premature death which is exactly what you’d expect from a devil’s bargain.
DeleteVery good, thank you.
Delete-S.T.
Introibo why did you stop the when strangers come knocking series, you never touched on the NO sect, and it’s clear you were not avoiding to talk sbout false “catholic” religions since you did conclavism
ReplyDelete@anon1:26
DeleteThe "When Strangers Come Knocking" series of posts required a lot of research. I can also cover a false religion in my current "Contending For The Faith" series (which replaced it) and discusses all things pertaining to apologetics.
As this blog is all about exposing the Vatican II sect, I didn't think a specific post about it could do the subject justice. In a sense EVERY post is against the Vatican II sect!
God Bless,
---Introibo
HIV is also a scam by Fauci. Virus is a theory never proven.
ReplyDeletehttps://thebigvirushoax.com/the-great-aids-hoax
Some resources above. The Rockefeller/ globalist clans redesigned the medical "industry" long ago, vaxxing (poisoning) the masses as they do today. They controlled the schools of course. The Novus Ordo (black coats) and the Medicine Men (white coats) are both deceptions, among others. They both remind me of that quote...where seemingly good people do the devil's work...because deceived of course.
@anon3:18
DeleteYou can certainly believe that but I'm skeptical and not ruling out anything at this point. As this topic does not concern the Traditionalist Catholic Faith, I will not debate it, but will allow my readers to research and decide for themselves.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Thanks for posting! It is worth looking at on many levels. Here is the quote I could not recall...God bless you too!
Delete"We must remember that if all the manifestly good men were on one side and all the manifestly bad men on the other, there would be no danger of anyone, least of all the elect, being deceived by lying wonders. It is the good men, good once, we must hope good still, who are to do the work of Anti-Christ and so sadly to crucify the Lord afresh…. Bear in mind this feature of the last days, that this deceitfulness arises from good men being on the wrong side."
--Fr. Frederick Faber, Sermon for Pentecost Sunday, 1861
Introibo
ReplyDeleteA SSPX priest today preached about the recent statements from "Pope" Francis when he was in Asia . He said that he did something bad but he is still our Father in God . We must pray for him and the suffering Church. Why do they hide the truth . My experience has been it depends on the SSPX priest . Some preach hard and others soft .
Listening to a recent sermon of Bp Pierre Roy of Canada was refreshing . He spoke the truth about this Apostate and how the Vatican Two Sect is poison.
@anon4:46
DeleteThat's one of the many serious problems with the R&R. We should have more Traditionalist clerics like Bp. Roy.
God Bless,
---Introibo
Please consider removing the graphic content. St. Paul Ephesians 5:11-12 taught, "11
ReplyDeleteTake no part in the fruitless works of darkness; rather expose them,
12
for it is shameful even to mention the things done by them in secret;"
You can make your argument just as strongly by not describing their sins.