Monday, February 10, 2020

There's Only One Race


It was the First Saturday Mass in January at the Ave Maria Chapel, twenty-four years ago. Father DePauw, my spiritual father who led me to the One True Church, would always have the first pews reserved for the children so he could quiz them on their monthly catechism lessons. It was also the Feast of the Epiphany. There was a beautiful and large manger outside the Chapel. Inside all could see an equally beautiful (yet decidedly smaller) one, on the Epistle side of the altar, just outside the Sanctuary. After his quiz, Father would deliver an approximately 10 minute sermon aimed at teaching the kids.

From the pulpit Father pointed to the indoor manger. "Do you see the Three Wise Men? They were blessed to be among the very first to see the Infant Savior. I want you to notice that one of the three has decidedly black skin, and the others have white skin. In life, you will meet some people with white skin who will tell you to hate people with black skin. You will also meet people with black skin who will tell you to hate people with white skin. These people who hate other people with different skin color would like everyone to live apart according to their color, and they also want you to believe that one skin color is better than others. This is stupid and not Catholic. Jesus Christ did not die on Good Friday for the black race, the white race, or the yellow race. He only died for one race--the human race to which all skin colors belong." (Written from my memory as best I remember. Father used that same sermon for the children virtually every First Saturday in January).

There is a disturbing trend among Millennials to take extreme positions. As a Generation Xer, I believe it is the effect of growing up in a world where all remaining vestiges of Catholicism were eliminated in the Great Apostasy by the Vatican II sect. If you look at the supporters of Communist Senator Bernie Sanders, there are overwhelming numbers of 23-38 year olds. There is a tendency among this generation to take extreme right-wing positions as well, such as Fascism/Neo-Nazism. Add to the mix the fact that four in ten millennials now say they are religiously unaffiliated, according to the Pew Research Center; therefore large numbers of young people are left without any thought of God and remain feeling empty. The extreme positions give the definitive answers regarding right and wrong/good and bad that the Church used to give before Vatican II created a new sect falsely claiming the title "Roman Catholic Church." (See https://www.pewforum.org/2019/10/17/in-u-s-decline-of-christianity-continues-at-rapid-pace/).

As a result of these sad circumstances, a new racism is being touted among some young people calling themselves "Traditionalist." Many of them are attracted to the fact that sedevacantism "sounds extreme" and are not really searching for the Truth. Their knowledge of the Faith is very superficial. Adding fuel to the fire, the media and political climate cause distrust among races. The liberals are making non-whites "victims" and want job quotas (think Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ), while conservatives are claiming racial superiority in the form of "White Nationalism." Both are causing a new and real hatred based on skin color. Some of these racists also think they can be Traditionalists simultaneously without contradiction in their beliefs. This post will explore Church teaching on racism, and the correct type of nationalism we need today.


Essential Unity of Humanity
In his first encyclical, Ad Beatissimi Apostolorum (1914), Pope Benedict XV declares that the relations between people should be one of brothers and sisters, i.e., of those who are one in nature because they are of the same family created by God. Discussing the ravages of the First World War (1914-1918), His Holiness writes, "Who would imagine as we see them thus filled with hatred of one another, that they are all of one common stock, all of the same nature, all members of the same human family?" (para. #3; Emphasis mine). 

In Mortalium Animos (1928), Pope Pius XI teaches, "... it is easily understood, and the more so because none now dispute the unity of the human race, why many desire that the various nations, inspired by this universal kinship, should daily be more closely united one to another." (para. #1; Emphasis mine). The same holy pontiff ordered the Sacred Congregation for Seminaries and Universities to compose a letter refuting and condemning racism and Nazi "Aryan race" ideology in order to prevent it from infecting Catholic educational institutions. The result was a privately circulated document entitled Instruction Concerning Racism, Its Doctrinal Errors and the Measures to be Employed Against Their Spread (hereinafter "Instruction"). The Instruction was dated April 13, 1938 and a complete English translation was made by canonist Bouscaren in the Canon Law Digest-Supplement 1941 (pgs. 165-167). The Congregation's Instruction condemns no less than eight (8) propositions as being both "pernicious" and "absurd:"

I. The human races, by their natural and immutable characters, are so different from each other that, the humblest of them is further from the highest race than of the highest animal species.

II. We must by all means, preserve and cultivate strong race and purity of blood, so that all which leads to this result is therefore honest and permitted.

III. It is blood, seat of the characteristics of the race, that all the intellectual and moral qualities of man derive as their main source.

IV. The basic purpose of education is to develop the characters of the race and inflame the minds of a burning love of their own race as the supreme good.

V. Religion is subject to the law of race and must be adapted to it.

VI. The first source and the supreme rule of law and order is racial instinct.

VII. There exists only the Cosmos or living universe; all things, including humans, are only various forms growing over the ages of universal life.

VIII. Each man exists only by the State and for the State. All that he rightly possesses derives exclusively from a concession to the State.

It shouldn't be too hard to understand that racism is inexorably linked to the damnable doctrine of Social Darwinism. It is taken from the false teaching of Charles Darwin (d. 1882) regarding evolution. The term "evolution" is used to refer to the general theory that all life on earth has evolved from non-living matter and progressed to more complex forms with time; humans are not special in any way--both body and soul (or "consciousness")-- comes from brute matter. This stands condemned by the Church.

As the late leading evolutionist George Gaylord Simpson observed:

"In the world of Darwin, man has no special status other than his definition as a distinct species of animal. He is in the fullest sense a part of nature and not apart from it. He is akin, not figuratively, but literally, to every living thing, be it an amoeba, a tapeworm, a seaweed, an oak tree, or a monkey—even though the degrees of relationship are different and we may feel less empathy for forty-second cousins like the tapeworm than for, comparatively speaking, brothers like the monkeys…." (See George Gaylord Simpson, "The World into Which Darwin Led Us," Science, Vol. 131 (1960), p. 970).

As a consequence of this error, when Darwinism is applied to society ("Social" aspect), you will get one of two malevolent results:

(a)  All higher forms of life are to be considered equal. Hence, there was a case here in New York, where a lawyer argued to give legal rights (and constitutional protections) to chimpanzees.
(See https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/do-apes-deserve-personhood-rights-lawyer-heads-n-y-supreme-n731431).

While we must be good stewards of all God has given us, and not abuse the animals God gave to Earth, it is insanity to assert (as some "animal rights activists" have done) that eating meat is "murder." According to the "People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals" (PETA), "We are taught the Golden Rule as young children, and all major religions teach principles of nonviolence and kindness. The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Ethical treatment—the Golden Rule—must be extended to all living beings: reptiles, mammals, fish, insects, birds, amphibians, and crustaceans." To include animals in the Golden Rule, which was given to humans by Christ, is blasphemous.(See https://www.peta.org/features/what-peta-really-stands-for/).

(b) As a consequence of the Darwinian principle of the "survival of the fittest," the superior have the right to dominate the inferior. Humans are animals and each race is different, insofar as it is alleged that certain races are inherently superior to others (Hitler's "Master Race"). According to the National Socialist Movement's (Neo-Nazi) website:

National Socialism is a worldview that is based upon the application of Natural Law to the individual, the family, the economy, and the nation. Natural Law is the organic expression of Truth found within all of nature. The nation within National Socialism is made up of a people who share the same language, heritage, culture, customs, and blood. (This is a perverted definition of "Natural Law" and there is no mention of God or religion; Emphasis mine) We seek to preserve and advance our culture, traditions, and our genetic inheritance based upon the principles of love and duty for our Faith, Family, and Folk. This can be summed up in the famous Fourteen Words "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children."( See https://www.nsm88.org/; Emphasis mine)

You also can't get more blunt than "King Shamir Shabazz" the leader of the New Black Panther Party's Philadelphia chapter, who said in a National Geographic documentary (January 2009), "I hate white people. All of them." The Panthers believe that the "superior race" is "Afro-centric."

True Nationalism and National Unity Can Only Be Built Upon The One True Church
As Pope Pius XI taught in his 1937 encyclical Mit Brennender Sorge, "Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the State, or a particular form of State, or the depositories of power, or any other fundamental value of the human community - however necessary and honorable be their function in worldly things - whoever raises these notions above their standard value and divinizes them to an idolatrous level, distorts and perverts an order of the world planned and created by God; he is far from the true faith in God and from the concept of life which that faith upholds." (para. #8). 

The Teachings of the Popes
1. In the absence of a restraining principle by which individual passions are controlled, moral unity of a nation becomes impossible.

Pope Pius XI, Divini Redemptoris, para. # 21: Nor can it be said that these atrocities are a transitory phenomenon, the usual accompaniment of all great revolutions, the isolated excesses common to every war. No, they are the natural fruit of a system which lacks all inner restraint. Some restraint is necessary for man considered either as an individual or in society. Even the barbaric peoples had this inner check in the natural law written by God in the heart of every man. And where this natural law was held in higher esteem, ancient nations rose to a grandeur that still fascinates - more than it should - certain superficial students of human history. But tear the very idea of God from the hearts of men, and they are necessarily urged by their passions to the most atrocious barbarity. (Emphasis mine)

2. People can choose the form of government they want, as long as it is not opposed to the Church and Her teachings.

Pope St. Pius X: Notre Charge Apostolique,  In the Encyclical on political government which We have already quoted, they could have read this: 'Justice being preserved, it is not forbidden to the people to choose for themselves the form of government which best corresponds with their character or with the institutions and customs handed down by their forefathers.' (Emphasis mine)

3. The State has an obligation to be a Catholic State, and the Church will bring blessings upon the people.

Pope Leo XIII: Immortale Dei: As a consequence, the State, constituted as it is, is clearly bound to act up to the manifold and weighty duties linking it to God, by the public profession of religion...Now, it cannot be difficult to find out which is the true religion, if only it be sought with an earnest and unbiased mind; for proofs are abundant and striking. We have, for example, the fulfillment of prophecies, miracles in great numbers, the rapid spread of the faith in the midst of enemies and in face of overwhelming obstacles, the witness of the martyrs, and the like. From all these it is evident that the only true religion is the one established by Jesus Christ Himself, and which He committed to His Church to protect and to propagate...the abundant benefits with which the Christian religion, of its very nature, endows even the mortal life of man are acquired for the community and civil society. And this to such an extent that it may be said in sober truth: "The condition of the commonwealth depends on the religion with which God is worshiped; and between one and the other there exists an intimate and abiding connection." (para. #6, 7, 19; Emphasis mine). 

4. Errors Concerning The One True Church and the State

Pope Pius IX, Syllabus of Errors, CONDEMNED PROPOSITIONS:

27. The sacred ministers of the Church and the Roman pontiff are to be absolutely excluded from every charge and dominion over temporal affairs.

40. The teaching of the Catholic Church is hostile to the well- being and interests of society.

42. In the case of conflicting laws enacted by the two powers, the civil law prevails.

48. Catholics may approve of the system of educating youth unconnected with Catholic faith and the power of the Church, and which regards the knowledge of merely natural things, and only, or at least primarily, the ends of earthly social life.

55. The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church.

Conclusion
Father DePauw's Chapel is approximately 30% non-white, and always was that way. It showed me the true "universal" (i.e., "Catholic") Nature of the Church. I remember one Sunday sitting between an Hispanic man and a Haitian woman. Neither spoke English other than a few simple phrases. Yet here we were at the same Mass. I looked over and saw one hand Missal was in French and English and the other in Spanish and English. Christ came to all three of us in Holy Communion that day regardless of race, language, or other worldly consideration.

God created one race, the human race. While we are composed of different skin colors, it should neither unite us like the Nazis or divide us like so-called "separatists." Let the One True Church unite us all in He Who is Truth Itself. "There is neither Jew nor Greek: there is neither bond nor free: there is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus." (Galatians 3:28). 



178 comments:

  1. Great topic! There is so much for exploration in your post that it's hard to know where to begin, Intro.
    When you described Social Darwinism, you nailed it. It seems to run two ways: the outright persecution of "undesirables" or calls for fake tolerance. How ironic that the Social Darwinists themselves cause divisions due to their overactive, malignant race-consciousness, then castigate those who disagree with their demand for quotas, special treatment for grievance groups, and lack of regulation of immigration, etc., as "racists".
    For them any natural difference in the races, sexes, and abilities (or lack thereof), of individuals is not God's great plan but a problem that must be solved by legislating group-think and homogenization of human beings, the easier to manage them. Those who resist the program or do not fit in might be then be eliminated.

    I wish I had known Fr. De Pauw. I have seen his video talks and he looked to be the soul of courage in speaking the truth about the Catholic faith in a time when few understood the real problem and fewer were willing to hear about it. If his words that you paraphrased were to be sent out to all Americans including our legislators, executives and judiciary, and taken seriously, what a beautiful conversion of hearts and souls there would be.
    - Jannie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jannie,
      Yes, the irony of Social Darwinism was not lost on you! It was a blessing from God to have had Fr DePauw as my spiritual father. He embodied, in my opinion, the best of the Church. Had people listened to his message, we would be in a better world.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  2. There are certain aspects that drive the racial paradigms of the younger generations which I can hopefully attest to as a Millennial myself.

    1) At least as far as America is concerned, racial tension is driven by hypocrisy and politics in some measure.

    I say "hypocrisy" because ever since childhood, equality was pushed as one of the highest social goods. However, in practice, certain racial or ethnic groups have social privileges that others do not, particularly because of political correctness. The racial paradigm from a prior era is perceived as reversed, where being a white, heterosexual man is now the lowest rung on the social ladder (especially in urban or cosmopolitan areas where liberal thought dominates). Even when the empirical data suggests that young white men are experiencing greater hardship as a whole compared to other groups (when comparing joblessness rates, education levels, suicide rates, and so on), they still are castigated in the wider popular culture as the source of all society's ills, and likewise blind to their own "privilege" (a recent infamous example of this came from Bernie Sanders, who stated at a Democratic debate that white people don't know what it's like to be poor, which is patently absurd). Popular culture, academia, and media still push this message relentlessly, and as such creates resentment.

    In terms of politics, there is the cynical exploitation of ethnic groups along racial and sexual lines to drive votes, mostly concentrated on the Left (since racial politics is their bread and butter compared to the mainstream Right in this day and age, which is more individualistic). This too engenders tension, and again contradicts the social value of "equality of all". (I would argue that the Obama Administration was especially culpable on this matter, as public opinion polls reflected a downgrade in race relations over the course of 2009-2017, as far as I recall).

    There are certainly more factors driving that tension at play than just those two, but those are the biggest off the top of my head.

    Ultimately, because of manifest contradictions between the social values they were taught and what's actually manifested in their lives, many Millenials and GenZ'ers have a more racial view of the world than GenX'ers did as a whole. (To be continued, because apparently a character limit)

    ReplyDelete
  3. (Continuing)

    2) Population Statistics

    Now, as far as the Right is concerned, a particularly large element of the new racism is driven by conflating population statistics with inherent value.

    There have been many empirical studies regarding IQ distributions and physical characteristics across national and ethnic lines, and there has been a trend to emphasize these stats as a means for discrimination by nation-states when it comes to immigration (since one's job prospects shrink the lower you go on the IQ scale). This particular form of argumentation has been advanced from self-described Skeptics on the Internet (one particular example being the atheist libertarian Stefan Molyneux, whose philosophical worldview has admittedly become more friendly to Christianity in light of its nature as a historical bulwark against totalitarianism, socialism, and Communism).

    It carries a lot of weight because of its inherent empiricism, but data is always morally neutral; how one interprets that data depends on your worldview. As such, this data regarding differences between IQ and physiology in the aggregate is interpreted to be fundamental differences between races by many Millennials and GenZ'ers who have not been educated in true philosophy (insert tirade against public education here), particular with regards to accidents and essence.

    IQ distributions and physiological differences are merely accidents; they are not intrinsic to human nature. Just because the average Kenyan tends to be a better runner and of lower intelligence than the average American does not mean they are of different races.

    3) Rebellion against Multiculturalism

    In parallel with points 1 and 2 above, these younger folks wish to preserve their own culture from what they perceive to be a political and social zeitgeist that wants the Third World to migrate to the First World. Notwithstanding the issues with regards to importing lower IQ individuals into a nation with a statistically higher IQ on average (since the majority of the job market will be out of their reach, they either tend to go on welfare or price the low-IQ natives out of their own jobs due to differences in living standards), the overall cultural differences are the greatest source of tension, as assimilation is not only no longer emphasized, but even discouraged (particularly by leftwing politicians). These differences manifest themselves in a variety of ways, even in personal hygiene.

    The most recent large-scale manifestation of this was Brexit, driven by a desire of the United Kingdom to regain its national sovereignty from the European Union (which has a policy in place of importing economic migrants in larger numbers, despite the protests of many citizens of its own member nations). Likewise, in America, you had a sufficient number of Republicans who were tired of the GOP ignoring their concerns about immigration, trade policy, and blue collar jobs, so they bucked the establishment politicians and turned to the one guy actually **talking** about the concerns in a non-derogatory manner: a billionaire real estate mogul, reality show star, and WWE Hall of Famer by the name of Donald Trump.

    In like manner, many of these younger generations perceive that their concerns are not being addressed by respectable groups, and so they have turned to unrespectable groups. That these unrespectable groups will naturally influence their own views seems to have escaped many. (To be continued...)

    ReplyDelete
  4. (Cotinuing)

    Long story short: when it comes to the Left, their racial worldview is a byproduct of the racialized politics of the Left, where diversity and multiculturalism are pushed as the highest goods. When it comes to the Right, at least as far as young white people in America are concerned, they're tired of being the whipping boy, of being treated as the original sin of society, and of being denied social privileges that other ethnic groups have that they don't (this again goes back to hypocrisy; to use an example, a lot of universities and colleges have clubs or groups for African-Americans, Hispanics, LGBTQinsert-letters-here, and so on; try creating one exclusively for white people and see how quickly you get shut down and denigrated as racist; the inherent contradiction seems to escape them). A recent meme demonstrates this divide, where a morally neutral statement like "It's OK to be white" is considered divisive: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/It%27s_OK_to_be_white

    However, both Left and Right confuse accidents for essence (albeit in different ways), and as such develop worldviews that exalt race at the expense of true diversity: the consecration and conversion of all cultures and nations to the merciful arms of Holy Mother Church, in service to the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the King of Kings and Lord of Lords.

    Sincerely,

    A Simple Man

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Simple Man,
      What an incredible analysis! Thank you!

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. There's one more point I'd like to elaborate on, with regards to Traditionalists in particular:

      It's been a common facet of American youth to rebel against and counter the mainstream culture of their day (the Sexual Revolution of the 60s being the most notorious example in the minds of most); this is no less true today, for a number of Millenials and GenZ'ers love to "troll" the liberal mainstream by espousing racial humor or racist worldviews, precisely because it gets under the skin of the modern-day Puritans of the Left. The degree to which these trolls actually subscribe to those views varies from person to person, as some actually believe in the racist presuppositions underlying their words, while others merely view the racist language as a means to an end, without necessarily being racist themselves.

      With this in mind, an observation I've noticed among a number of young Traditionalists is that the traditional Catholic faith is followed not necessarily for its own sake - namely, because it is the true religion, proclaiming the proper way of worshiping God - but because it is a means by which they can counter the degeneracy of modern culture. In other words, Catholicism is not an end in and of itself, but a tool.

      I can only relate personal observations (as I doubt there exists actual hard data or surveys regarding Traditionalist youths, so take this for what it's worth), but one particular example that's stuck with me was a young woman I met while visiting a Traditional chapel (I believe it was during last year's Feast of the Assumption). We struck up a conversation, and seemed to have a lot in common politically (we also had a common background in terms of being converts, except I had been raised Protestant, winding my way through the Novus Ordo, to the Indult, and finally to sedevacantism; she had been raised in an atheistic/agnostic household, and had converted straight to traditional Catholicism), and continued to talk in person and by text. I did harbor thoughts of eventual romance and courtship, but a few weeks afterwards, our particular topic of conversation at that time (I don't quite recall) resulted in a very casual display of racism that left me rather dumbstruck. After some additional questioning, I discovered she had some rather colorful opinions about black people, modern African-American culture, and miscegenation.

      We eventually drifted apart due to differences in our ultimate life goals, but what I recall quite clearly is how she described the Catholic Faith as the means by which we would combat the evils plaguing Western culture, modern democracy, and so on.

      Now, it is true that the Catholic Church stands against the errors and evils of any earthly society; however, that is merely a **byproduct** of the Church's actual mission, which is the salvation of souls, and the conversion of the world to Christ. To treat the Church as merely a tool to accomplish some temporal end or political end (whatever it may be) is to invert the ends and the means.

      I may be overthinking this, but has anyone else had this observation regarding younger Traditionalists treating the Catholic Faith (consciously or otherwise) as though it were not primarily about their own salvation, but about something lesser and more earthly?

      Sincerely,

      A Simple Man

      Delete
    3. Simple Man,
      Most interesting observation! I wonder if my other readers have anything to say about this.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    4. Truthfully, I may have converted, or been lead to my conversion, for this reason, as a resistance to the broken modern world. But the deeper I got into my faith, the more I became supernaturally aware rather than naturally and this was no longer a priority.
      I, too, have seen the data for racial disparities and while I acknowledge the differences between the races, a belief that can get you labelled as a racist and therefore "un-personned" in today's society, I do not take the view that this leads to superior and inferior races. I do think that as we are of different races we have different natures, and as we know mans natural state is flawed, therefore some races are more flawed in some ways than others. But as Simple Man points out these are merely ones accidents and not their essence, something that I must admit I had not thought of in those terms before, until reading your comment and for that I thank you. We also know that one can only overcome ones fallen nature by the grace of God.
      This is all the more reason to preach and convert those of other races and in this increasingly mixed West, so that the negative natures be overcome, but the salvation of souls should always be at the heart. Moreover, even if plans of completely homogenous ethnostates are realised this would not lead to lasting peace and harmony amongst the populace. All states, whether diverse or not, must first acknowledge Christ as King.

      Delete
    5. @anon2:22
      Thank you for your interesting and thoughtful comment!

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    6. A Simple Man,

      You are not supposed to talk to a woman as if she were a man and to see her viewpoints through such a lens. If you wanted to be romantically involved with her and marry and start a family, nothing of her beliefs should have stopped you because women always adopt the beliefs of their guardian and steward--their father in their early life and their husband later on.

      In other words, you could have easily convinced her of your position over time if you two planned on marrying and she planned on submitting to you. However, you treated her views as if they were steadfast and unmoving, and in doing so you lost a potential partner for life. This is a very sad story. How many holy, devout young women exist today? That you rejected the pursuit of one because you viewed her positions on a few subjects as verboten and did so in a mistaken manner is sad, very sad.

      Delete
  5. To keep giving "minorities" freebies and special treatment due to the color of their skin is unequal in my opinion!
    JoAnn

    ReplyDelete
  6. Joann,
    I agree! The left-wing fuels racism and resentment with quotas and the like, as I wrote above!

    God Bless,

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  7. You are happy to go live in the ghetto? You can go there and convert them. They are savages too.

    I am not out on a mission to convert. I am raising a family.

    ReplyDelete
  8. @Smocko,
    So every place African-Americans live is a “ghetto”? Not too stereotypical! They are “savages.” Not too hateful!

    You are not on a mission to convert. Query: Who said, “Go forth and teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost”?

    Who said, “Proselytizing is solemn nonsense” ?

    I have a family too. This post was meant for people like yourself to understand Church teaching on the subject. I can only hope God will reach at least some.

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  9. Just about every ethnic group that has come to America has encountered racism. My Grandparents were from Italy. They encountered racism in the early 1900's. Because they were from Italy and Catholic they encountered slurs alluding that they were in the Mafia. People would throw tomatoes at them and call them crazy Papists. They had 12 children, but were were not looking for hand outs or to live off the Government. They worked hard and didn't become bitter or resentful over the racism they experienced. They didn't use racism/discrimination as a reason not to work nor did they spout "poor me" as a result of the treatment they encountered. They weren't looking for special treatment as some are today and unfortunately getting it. Until the Government quits babying these "minorities" and giving into them every time they cry "racism" and "poor me" will they ever be made to take responsibility and quit their whining.
    Tuff love is what they need, not cuddled and given whatever they want because they scream racism! My 2 cents.
    JoAnn

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joann,
      I agree that the answer is NOT special treatment or a victim mentality. We need less government interference and more of the True Faith—like your grandparents had when they came over from Europe!

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. Introibo, My Grandparents from Italy did possess the True Faith! My Grandmother would walk 1 mile each way everyday to go to Mass. The Church was the center of their life. Their home had holy water in every room, crucifixes and statutes of the Lord and the Blessed Mother. Scapulars and medals were worn. Confession was on at least a monthly basis. Oh, how I miss those pre-Vatican II days!
      JoAnn

      Delete
  10. Introibo, All your idealistic platitudes sound good, but until you have become a victim of multiple violent crimes perpetrated upon your person by these so called human beings, you have no right to disparage others viewpoints based upon their experiences.

    ReplyDelete
  11. @anon8:16
    According to the statistics compiled at prisonpolicy.org:

    Overall murder rates have been declining since 1980, when the total rate for murder and non-negligent manslaughter was 10.2 per 100,000 people. But the disproportionately high rate at which Black Americans are murdered should still concern lawmakers, reporters, and the public.

    Unfortunately, conversations about about this problem often fall back on the assumption that violence in Black communities has cultural — or even biological — roots. But these assumptions aren’t supported by data.

    For instance, Krivo and Peterson’s analysis of crime data in Columbus, Ohio shows that economic disadvantage, not race, is the strongest predictor of violence in a particular neighborhood. “In fact,” they conclude, “violent crime rates for extremely disadvantaged white neighborhoods are more similar to rates for extremely disadvantaged black areas than to rates for other types of white neighborhoods.”

    This has been borne out by my experience with neighborhoods here in NYC as well.

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  12. @anon1:41
    So called human beings? What if you’re victimized by someone who is white and of the same ethnicity as yourself? On what basis do you hate them? Can’t be racial or ethnic without necessarily condemning yourself.

    Evil people come in all colors, ethnicities, etc. Was it a mere platitude when Our Lord said,
    “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven.” (St. Matt. 5: 43-45).

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  13. @anon4:46
    Then you had better be prepared to avoid white neighborhoods of low socio-economic status like the one in which I grew up. Drugs, alcohol, and violent crimes were rampant. Such neighborhoods are statistically as dangerous as non-white neighborhoods that are dangerous. It has more to do with educational level and socio-economic status.

    There are different types of love. I don’t love my wife the same as I did my mother, or love my friends like I love God. To love one who does wrong to you means to forgive them the wrong they did and wish them no evil.

    Look to St Maria Goretti. Alessandro Serenelli tried you rape the 12 year old. She refused to give in and in frustration he stabbed her 14 times. On the way to the hospital SHE FORGAVE HIM. Serenelli was convicted of attempted rape and murder.

    While in prison, the soul of St Maria appeared to him, asking him to repent because she wanted him to go to Heaven. He became a model Catholic and prisoner, and testified as to St Maria’s sanctity. After 27 years in prison, he was released and went to St Maria’s mother to beg forgiveness, which she gave to him.

    On June 24, 1950, Pope Pius XII canonized Maria Goretti, with her mother sitting upfront with her attempted rapist and murderer sitting next to her. Serenelli died in 1970 at age 87, having given all his possessions to the poor and living as a Gardner for a group of Capuchin friars—he was repentant to the end and most likely saved because of the love of his victim.

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  14. There was also a time where African-Americans had higher marital rates than white households (this rate plummeted after LBJ's Great Society was instituted, which incentivized single mother households); in like manner, you can find monstrous behavior from any particular ethnic group (given that the common factor is humanity). To treat accidental characteristics (like culture or statistics) as intrinsic to black people as a group is erroneous, since accidents are subject to change.

    There's a difference between discriminating based on behavior and probabilities (also known as exercising one's own judgment) and discriminating solely based on race. Otherwise, you lump criminals from the ghetto together with Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Candace Owens, and so on, simply because of their melanin concentration.

    Sincerely,

    A Simple Man

    ReplyDelete
  15. I am not a Saint, however, I would not repay their evil, but want justice which is my right. To try to say that someone is obligated to forgive such an horrendous crime without the perp repenting and asking for forgiveness, is not right. God doesn't forgive unless we repent and ask for forgiveness. This forgiveness of others without their repentance is something the Protestants are always preaching.

    ReplyDelete
  16. "Whosoever does the will of my Father, that is in heaven, he is my brother, and sister, and mother". Hardly anyone quotes this Bible verse.
    It is much more politically correct to quote the scripture about "loving your enemies". How nobel one sounds who quotes it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Did you ever stop to think that they are disadvantaged because they are criminals??

    ReplyDelete
  18. Pardoning enemies is a Catholic doctrine. Difficult but you can do it.

    ReplyDelete
  19. @anon7:52
    The two verse are complimentary not contradictory.

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  20. @anon7:59
    I grew up indigent. My father suffered life long PTSD from WW2, and the government did almost nothing to help (also much less was known at that time). He made slightly above minimum wage, and my mother suffered from numerous medical ailments most of her adult life. We lived in a section 8, rent controlled apartment and were on public assistance.

    None of us ever broke the law. Many who were disadvantaged broke the law, but I’m living proof such is not the case for all.

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  21. My last comment was to Anon 7:59; but i think it also fits with Anon 7:52. Nobody tells you to live with the blacks.

    ReplyDelete
  22. @anon 7:46
    To want justice is your right. You can forgive the wrong done while praying for their conversion. St Maria didn’t wait for her murderer’s conversion when she forgave him.

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  23. Poni,
    You are so right!!

    God Bless,

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  24. The government helped, but the only One that could do something actually fruitful was God.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Simple Man,
    Well written! I agree!

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  26. Show me the Catholic doctrine that you need to forgive someone who is not repentant? God does not forgive unless we are repentant - how are we who are human expected to do more than God? I can understand praying for them though.
    It is easy for some to spout platitudes when they haven't been on the receiving end of a very violent crime.
    Where is your empathy for victims of violent crimes? All you seem do is stick up for and make excuses for perpetrators and criminals.

    ReplyDelete
  27. St. Martin of Porres was an exception not the majority.

    ReplyDelete
  28. @anon
    Martin of Porres was an exception because he was able to overcome his skin color and not be “a savage.” And you see nothing wrong with this warped and immoral view?

    @anon10:17
    Forgiveness does not mean making someone your “buddy.” It means:

    1. You don’t will their damnation
    2. You pray for their conversion
    3 This does not preclude seeking justice


    God treats us the same. He wills our salvation even if we are unrepentant and gives us Graces to try and get us back in His Sanctifying Grace.

    Perpetrators are slime. I make excuses for no one. I believe in capital punishment. However, we must hold ourselves to the high standards of Christ.

    If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” St. Matthew 5:46-48

    St Maria Goretti performed an act of heroic charity by forgiving her murderer and attempted rapist PRIOR to his repentance. Hence, her sainthood.

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  29. @anon10:56
    Forgiveness does not mean not bringing someone to justice. I’ll repeat what I write above:

    Forgiveness does not mean making someone your “buddy.” It means:

    1. You don’t will their damnation
    2. You pray for their conversion
    3 This does not preclude seeking justice


    God treats us the same. He wills our salvation even if we are unrepentant and gives us Graces to try and get us back in His Sanctifying Grace.

    Perpetrators are slime. I make excuses for no one. I believe in capital punishment. However, we must hold ourselves to the high standards of Christ.

    If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” St. Matthew 5:46-48

    St Maria Goretti performed an act of heroic charity by forgiving her murderer and attempted rapist PRIOR to his repentance. Hence, her sainthood.

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  30. Martin of Porres was an exception because he was able to overcome his skin color and not be “a savage.” And you see nothing wrong with this warped and immoral view?"
    It is not a "warped and immoral view" - unfortunately, it is reality - unless you want to live with your head in the clouds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just because the above was YOUR experience does not mean everyone has had the same experiences as YOU. I don't think one's experiences are considered Church doctrine.

      Delete
    2. Seems you are being somewhat racist against the ethnic neighborhood you lived in!! Lol

      Delete
    3. @anon12:22
      LOL! I’m just pointing out there’s good and bad in all people. No race has a monopoly on being good!

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    4. If I recall correctly. the National Socialists of Germany and the Red Communists of Soviet Russia were rather pale in complexion.

      Likewise for Napoleon.

      No particular skin color has a monopoly on evil behavior; nor is any particular skin color immune from the same. The distribution of evil behavior, however, has varied throughout history.

      Sincerely,

      A Simple Man

      Delete
    5. I don't recall saying any one race has a monopoly on being good. However, I do know what the statistics show - but you don't seem to want to acknowledge the reality of it, except to make excuses.

      Delete
    6. @anon1:02
      I supplied statistics in these comments from a reputable source that low socio-economic white neighborhoods are equal in crime rate to non-white neighborhoods.

      @anon12:10
      I’m relying on the statistics not just my personal experience. It IS condemned by the Church that one race is superior to another; see my post above.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  31. "If your brother or sister, sins go and point out their fault, just between the two of you. If they listen to you, you have won them over. But if they will not listen, take one or two others along, so that ‘every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.’If they still refuse to listen, tell it to the church; and if they refuse to listen even to the church, treat them as you would a pagan or a tax collector."
    How do you explain the above Bible verse from Matthew?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon11:41
      You do not have a DUTY to forgive an unrepentant sinner, but it is an act of heroic charity if you do. You are only required to;
      1. Not wish his eternal damnation
      2. Pray for his conversion
      3. You may seek justice

      Forgiveness does not mean “having warm fuzzy feelings” like the Modernists teach.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. Introibo,
      Years ago before I found Tradition, I was speaking with a Protestant Pastor about something horrific that happened to me. The Pastor emphatically told me that I had to forgive the person or I was damned to hell. I told him, I wished the person no harm, prayed for them, but could not forgive them. I was still told I was damned to hell for not forgiving them. The reason I was speaking with a Protestant is because I couldn't stand the Novus Ordo and it's "Priests". The Protestant turned out to be just as bad as the Novus Orodites!
      JoAnn

      Delete
    3. Joann,
      The Vatican II sect is just as bad as the Protestants with the warped notion of “forgiveness.” You did indeed forgive that person. You are a good person for doing so.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    4. Introibo,
      Where do all the differences and "warped" ideas concerning forgiveness in the NO and in Protestantism stem from? There is such confusion concerning forgiveness. I just read an article by "Pope" Francis in which he states that we must forgive or God will not forgive us. If God will not forgive us, then we are damned, just as the Protestant Pastor told me years ago.
      JoAnn

      Delete
    5. Joann,
      It comes from the Protestant idea of forgiveness which is heretical. God forgives you no matter what if you believe. Your sins are “covered up” by Christ Whom the Father now sees because of Faith alone. No need to do real Penance, etc. You are then forgiven if you sin, and can never lose your salvation. You are guaranteed Heaven. Since we must forgive as God forgives, you see where the false idea originated. The Vatican II sect rejects Catholic teaching.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    6. To be fair, as is stated by Jesus Himself in the Pater Noster:

      Forgive us our sins, *as we forgive those who trespass against us*


      Here we clearly see that the standard of forgiveness that we hold against others, God will hold towards us. If we express the virtue of liberality in our forgiveness and love our enemies as Christ commands in the virtue of charity (i.e. for Gods sake, not our own), then God will outdo us no doubt in our own particular judgements. Likewise, if we are stingy with our forgiveness, then I shudder to think about how our particular judgements will go. It's so clearly stated in such a commonly recited prayer, yet I fear that anonymous commenter from above might not be aware of this fact.

      Of course, as Introibo pointed out, true Catholic forgiveness is not fuzzy modernist sympathies, but rests in praying for our perpetrators, and wishing no damnation on them, but for their own repentance and salvation for the glory of God. Their souls are loved by God just as our souls are.

      Delete
    7. Introibo,
      Have you done a post on the True Church and it's teaching on forgiveness? If not, would you consider doing one? There is much confusion out there floating around regarding forgiveness. Thanks.
      JoAnn

      Delete
    8. Also, by "anonymous commenter from above", I was referring to another commenter, not you JoAnn. Didn't realize your account was technically anonymous, so just wanted to clarify!

      Delete
    9. @neyoriquans
      Well stated!

      @Joann,
      Yes, forgiveness would make a good post. I would definitely consider doing such a post this year!

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    10. neoriquans - If I am the anonymous you referred to in your comment, I was confused over forgiveness for years and I am a recent Traditionalist. I never wished harm to my Perpetrator and I prayed for them. However, I was told by both NO Priests and Protestants that was not forgiveness. I then felt that I was unable to forgive as I felt it was beyond whatever the No "Priests" and the Pastor's were requiring of me. I don't know if this is clear, but it is the best I can do to try to explain the quandary I was in.
      JoAnn

      Delete
    11. Introibo,
      Not to belabor the subject of forgiveness, but wanted to say I was very surprised to learn the amount of people who are confused over forgiveness thanks to the NO and the Protestants bad teaching. I have met many good people who are beating themselves up because they feel they can't forgive due to the bad teaching they have received. It is sad.
      JoAnn

      Delete
    12. Joann,
      I agree. In this time of Great Apostasy, we have mass confusion on many matters--forgiveness being one of them!

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  32. Please cite the Church doctrine that states one must forgive unrepentant sinners?

    ReplyDelete
  33. @anon12:14
    We don’t need to forgive unrepentant sinners. However, it is heroic virtue if we do. In St. Luke 17:3–4, Christ says, “If your brother sins, rebuke him, and if he repents, forgive him; and if he sins against you seven times in the day, and turns to you seven times, and says, ‘I repent,’ you must forgive him.”

    Notice that Jesus says to forgive him if he repents, not regardless of whether he does so. Jesus also envisions the person coming back to you and admitting his wrong. However, you forgive in this case by:
    1. Not wishing their damnation
    2. Praying for their conversion
    3. You can seek due justice

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  34. Here is a good video called "The 14 Flowers of Pardon" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5rVSDBreUM documentary about St. Maria Goretti in case any of your readers are interested.

    Lee

    ReplyDelete
  35. Lee,
    Thank you for the excellent information!

    God Bless,

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  36. I live in a place which is 99.9% made up of people of European descent. When I go into the city it is crowded with people of a hundred different ethnicities. Is it wrong for me to prefer living where I am and being thankful that I don't live in a densely populated multicultural area? Crime is low and life is quiet. I can understand everyone I speak to, and they all look like me. Is it wrong for me to enjoy this aspect of my life and to hope it stays that way? My only wish for improvement is that I wish that they would all convert and be Catholics. I don't think I'm better than anyone else. We are all sinners deserving damnation. But there is something that I think is good about where I live. Any thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I for one don't think that what you describe is genuine racism in the least, although I must admit that I am of a very similar mind in this regard. It is a Catholic duty and virtue to love one's nation and people, and likewise I would find it very hard to believe that to be against open borders, mass immigration, and the socially engineered destruction of certain cultures by an arguably very evil political and globalist elite is in any way anti-Catholic.

      However, if one delves deeper into the ideology of "Race-Realism" and alt-right sentiments on these matters, which I sadly used to ascribe to in varying degrees, it becomes clear to see the reason for the article written by Introibo. All it takes is a couple of looks at some of the genuinely racist posts in this comment thread to see that there's a line between what I presume you and I espouse, the protection and promotion of a groups' shared identity and borders, and the evolutionary ideology of racial supremacy and inferiority between people of different races, claiming an intrinsic and absolute difference in the value of certain groups of people.

      One produces saints such as St. Joan of Arc, who fought and ultimately gave her life for the liberation of her people, the French Nation, from the control of a foreign British Government; while the other produces the likes of women like Margaret Sanger, a vile eugenicist and evolutionist who labored immensely for the institution of Planned Parenthood and abortion in order to target "undesirables" such as the African American community to purify America's genepool. (I could list countless other eugenicists who have done unimaginable harm to innocent populations due to their vile eugenicist ideas founded on what I will always argue are ultimately unsound evolutionary principles).

      The tragedy of our position, that being the protection of a particular culture or way of life merely on the grounds that it's worthy of protection, is that it is very often found in the company of "race realists" and other eugenicist groups that are quite clearly not Catholic. However, if it is not Catholic to be against open borders, mass immigration, and this planned globalist heterogenization of particularly western nations, then someone forgot to tell the likes of Novus Ordo Watch as well as Bishop Donald Sanborn, who have in countless articles and podcasts called out Francis for his open borders nonsense that is very likely a stepping stone for the rule of Antichrist.

      Delete
    2. Mike,
      I don't think there is anything wrong with where you live or what you're doing. You certainly have expressed a Traditionalist Catholic outlook. Those who think others "inferior" or who discriminate against others (hating them) are doing something wrong. You are not doing anything wrong.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    3. @neyoriquans,
      You have express Traditionalist Catholic values and sentiments. I agree with you. Your comment does a good job making necessary and proper distinctions.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    4. If I were a blogger then I would give myself a pat on the back for this post- not necessarily because of the quality of the content but due to providing a clear perspective on a controversial issue. Having said that there are come clear problems with your post:

      1) The main problem is that you use this communist term "racism" which was only ever intended to be a form of disparagement for those "reactionaries" who opposed or sought to impede Communist goals
      2) The second problem is the error of false equivalence and the use of relative terms like extreme "there are people on both the far left and the far right...". Let's define left and right the way most traditionalists understand it. The Right is a term which referred to monarchists in France who opposed the revolutionary republicans. The Right stood for order, tradition, family, God and "logos". The Left stood for revolution, rebellion, "liberty, equality and fraternity", social engineering etc. To be far right or even extreme right is in no way equivalent to being far left- especially when the political centre seems to be accepting sodomites getting married. The leftists of the French Revolution would never have dreamed of that! Needless to say that- according to the political spectrum in which we find ourselves, we are all extreme right
      3) The use of the strawman- the idea that there are people who hate people based on the colour of their skin is just ridiculous. As (black) conservative commentator Jessie Lee Peterson points out "racism (in this sense) doesn't exist". People don't resent black people because of their degree of melanin but based on generally-observable black behaviour. This is not merely a matter of prejudice (although if it were it wouldn't even matter) but have a look at the observable data- the crime statistics, the family dysfunction statistics and not wanting your country full of such people makes sense. Most Asian countries understand this and adopt sensible immigration policies
      4) The conflation of humanity being one in the mystical body of Christ with the idea of their being only "one race" the human race implies that differences between races are merely superficial- just the colour of one's skin whereas they are often quite substantial. When DNA is passed on, it is not merely physical attributes that are passed on but also culture, attitudes, ways of living. You will notice that even after hundreds of years, there are still very similar traits between the African and the American negro (the father running away after siring a child for instance which is classic African behaviour)
      5) You have ignored the instances in the Bible where God clearly delineates, favours and blesses certain races. Some examples being
      a) In Genesis 16:11 where Hagar bore a son Ishmael (the descendent of the Arabs) who would be a "wild ass of a man...his hand will be against every man and every man's hand against him". How hateful right?
      b) Genesis 11:1-9 where God Himself ordained that tribes be separated (multiculturalism is therefore by definition Satanic)
      c) God both blessed the Jews (Old Testament) and cursed the Jews (actually the Jews cursed themselves)
      d) The curse of Ham was the curse of the black race

      I think one can simultaneously deal with the truth about different tribes and also treat others with respect and charity. I would rather millennials and Gen Z turn to the "extreme" right were we as Western nations might turn back the third-world hordes and have some chance of living in peace that to have civil war with every tribe fighting for the scraps from an oligarch's table!

      Delete
    5. Unknown,

      1. The term “racism” was used by Pope Pius XI and the Sacred Congregation of Seminaries and Universities. I guess they were Communists?

      2. Never having taken a poll, I don’t know how most Traditionalists understand “extreme left” and “extreme right.” I’m sure you have reliable statistics and polling data. Extreme left are politically those (legitimate) Communists who incite race hatred based on painting certain races as “victims” while the alt-right portrays them as “inferiors.”

      3. No. I grew up where people were hated simply for being different. The observable crime stats show indigent white neighborhoods having the same crime rate as indigent black neighborhoods.

      4. A Cardinal is different from a blue jay, but both are still birds.

      God never cursed Ham. There is no "curse of Ham" in Genesis 9. Instead, Noah places a curse on Canaan (who in the narrative is Ham's son). And this "Canaan" is obviously the eponymous ancestor of the Canaanites of the land of Canaan, who are the ones the Israelites are subsequently depicted (in the book of Joshua) as depriving of the land, in punishment for their idolatry and wickedness, so the story goes.
      The first appearance of a "curse of Ham" is in the Middle Ages, and it's a puzzle where it comes from, as there is no basis in the Genesis text.

      Second, the figure Ham in Genesis 9 is the ancestor of the peoples of Canaan, and also Egypt, and perhaps Libya, and Ethiopia. So, by no means simply "black people."

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    6. Introibo,
      God did choose the Jewish race. Jesus was Jewish. How is that explained?
      Also, why did Jesus curse the fig tree?
      Thanks.
      JoAnn

      Delete
    7. @anon8:27
      No, that is called stupidity. Christ was not black. I will say that pre-V2 some Asian Catholics had statues of Christ looking Asian. This was simply to show “Christ is the Savior of all people,” and not trying to make an historical case that Christ was Asian or had yellow skin.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    8. Joann,
      Jews are not a “race,” properly so-called. Their skin is white; they are a people who share a common lineage. If the mother is Jewish, the child is Jewish regardless of the father. If a Jewish woman marries a black man, the child is Jewish. Then this daughter marries a black man. The child is Jewish, even though she is now with dark black skin.

      Christ cursed the fig tree which bore no fruit in due season as a way to castigate people who bear no spiritual fruit. Each of us can find some reason why it’s not our season to flourish, why we should wait until later. In cursing a tree that also seemed to have an “excuse” for not flourishing, Jesus is showing us what he thinks of this excuse-making.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    9. Introibo,
      You didn't answer my question above:Why did God choose the Jews?
      Thanks.
      JoAnn

      Delete
    10. Joann,
      The “Chosen People” refers to Jews as “chosen,” to remind the world of Abraham’s monotheistic message and to remind the world of a moral code, and a system of ethics that has already shaped the world around us, thereby elevating humanity.

      The first reference to God’s Chosen people is in Exodus.

      Exodus 19:5-6

      “And now, if you obey Me and keep My covenant, you shall be to Me a treasure out of all peoples, for Mine is the entire earth. 6. And you shall be to Me a kingdom of princes and a holy nation.' These are the words that you shall speak to the children of Israel."

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    11. I remember reading somewhere that the Jews were the chosen people because Mary the Mother of God came from that race.
      If that is so, would it be because God knew from all eternity that She would be the person most conformed to His will and therefore the perfect creature who would ever live? I'd like your thoughts on that, Intro.
      - Jannie

      Delete
    12. Jannie,
      In a sense that is true. God knows all the free choices of human beings from eternity. He doesn’t cause them, but He knows them, as God is omniscient.

      Therefore, God knew Abraham would profess Him, and through this people would come the Blessed Virgin Mary, who would be most conforming to His Will. Hence, Mary was chosen as God’s Mother. This seems very plausible.

      The problem I see with this theological opinion as you stated, is it would seem that God would need to COERCE Abraham to accept Him in order for the Jews to be chosen. That can’t be, and I personally don’t see a way around it. If you meant it as I first stated, then I see no problem.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    13. Yes, I kind of thought of it as not a choosing by God that must be carried out by the chosen, but by God's foreknowledge of their free will acts, He chose to reward them and call them His people as sign of His favor and of a future life in His Kingdom if they remained faithful.

      Delete
    14. Jannie,
      I agree that is a viable theological opinion!

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    15. Introibo,
      I read that the Jews were God’s last choice to establish a covenant. That God first went to the children of Esau to establish a covenant and was rejected. Is this true?

      Delete
    16. @anon3:41
      In a sense it is true because Esau was firstborn of Rebecca and Issac. His fraternal twin Jacob came out second. In Genesis chapters 25-27 we see Esau did not value his birthright over a bowl of lentil stew, selling it to Jacob. Thus, by his actions, Esau demonstrates that he does not deserve to be the one who continues Abraham's responsibilities and rewards under God's covenant, since he does not have the steady, thoughtful qualities which are required.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  37. Introibo,

    What do you think of the following link:

    https://www.npr.org/2020/02/12/805237120/ghost-dna-in-west-africans-complicates-story-of-human-origins

    ReplyDelete
  38. @anon2:24
    I think human origins is a science that is to in flux to be of value. There are too many with agendas. The only part about that story, as reported in another source was unquestionably true, “ The findings are far from definitive”

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  39. Introibo,
    You reference above that the crime rate is due to blacks being disadvantaged, not race. I do not believe it is their skin color, but something is seriously amiss. For instance in the last 2 days there have been 4 police officers shot in my City and one officer killed. Please tell me how the blacks who shot these officers being "disadvantaged" would lead to such crime? They didn't rob the officers. It is a wanton and reckless disregard for human life, not being "disadvantaged" that is the cause for their crimes.

    ReplyDelete
  40. @anon5:30
    For many poverty is an excuse for lawlessness. Many drink and take drugs, this leading to stealing to support their habits. It goes downhill from there. Poverty is no excuse for crime as I grew up indigent and worked 39 hours per week and a partial scholarship to put myself through college and graduate school. I then used my wages saved from teaching to put myself through law school.

    Most of the white people with whom I grew up died from drugs, alcohol, or in prison. They did not have the grace of God. That’s what’s missing in indigent neighborhoods be they black or white. The True Church is the answer.

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  41. The whites dying of drugs and alcohol are killing themselves, they are not predominantly murdering and killing others as are the blacks. Some of the big cities are virtual war zones due to the blacks committing murders on a daily basis.
    You seem to have more empathy for the murderers than for the addicts.

    ReplyDelete
  42. What about interracial relationships? Is it wrong to oppose them? Or should a Catholic just have no opinion on them? Also, what about the fact that white/European people are being systematically replaced in their own countries? Is it wrong to care for your own race based on these facts? [It is a fact that in European and North American nations whites have lower birth rates and immigration problems.]

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon2:25
      There is nothing in Natural Law, Divine Positive Law, or Ecclesiastical Law which prohibits interracial marriage. Fr DePauw presided over the marriage of a white military officer and an African American woman who were both devout Traditionalists. They met at the Ave Maria Chapel.

      I care about the human race. Skin color, to use scholastic terminology, is an accident that inheres in the substance of a person.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. I guess you are against building walls and like the idea of open borders?

      Delete
    3. @anon5:50
      I’m opposed to illegal immigration and support all reasonable measures to stop it. I’m also in support of deporting them.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    4. Anyone who thinks that the African American population isn't totally out of control in this Country, either is blind, in denial, or led a very sheltered life. Some, perhaps are just trying to be politically correct, or building castles in the sky. I, for one have been on the receiving end of discrimination by African Americans such as being referred to as a "Honkey" and a "cracker.
      I never returned their insults, however. I have experienced more than one physical assault. I have witnessed a City being carnaged and made uninhabitable. It is not a pretty sight, but I refuse to live a lie or be in denial or have my head in the clouds, but rather face the cold stark reality instead. May I remind Introibo that the ethnic group he has disparaged above is the same ethnicity as the majority of Popes and, I believe, the majority of Saints as well. How many African Popes or Saints are there, Introibo? I do not wish harm to any African American, not even the ones who have assaulted me. I refuse, however, to not acknowledge the harm, devastation and destruction to Cities and persons this race has inflicted and is inflicting.

      Delete
    5. @anon5:22
      I’m the ultimate realist. I’ve used statistics to back my assertions up, and they are confirmed by my personal experience as well.

      I have disparaged no one. There is good and bad in all people. How many Chinese popes have there been? How many Indian popes? How many Polish popes? Wojtyla certainly doesn’t count.

      The Italian people were among the first to be proselytized. They are right where the Eternal City is located.

      I’m glad that you acted in a very Christian manner to those who treated you shamefully. There are many colors. Including white, inflicting harm. It’s due to a lack of God, not an excess of melatonin.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    6. I didn't say it was "an excess of melatonin". It is their BEHAVIOR that I object to. I witness it everyday, unfortunately.

      Delete
    7. I don't see other groups of people creating the amount of carnage that the Africans do to cities. By the way how many African Saints and Popes are there? They tend to follow Luther, perhaps that is their problem.

      Delete
    8. There are many peoples who came to this country "disadvantaged" and didn't act like the Africans. They overcame. The Africans want to be stuck in "poor me" mode and get handouts and not take responsibility for themselves. Also, they are mad at the world because they weren't born white.

      Delete
    9. They are the ones with the "race" problem as far as I can see. They are the ones who move into white areas and don't seem to be happy until they pilfer and make the neighborhood virtually uninhabitable. They are angry they are not white - as if the white man caused the color of their skin. As I was told by an African American woman co-worker at an office where I worked "You and your LILY WHITE SKIN"!! I wouldn't even begin to think of saying anything about a person's skin color to them. Now you tell me who has the "race" problem?

      Delete
    10. @anon8:31
      “You don’t see” other groups of people causing problems? I have. The reliable statistics bear this out.

      There is good and bad in all people. How many Chinese popes have there been? How many Indian popes? How many Polish popes? Wojtyla certainly doesn’t count.

      What about indigenous black people from South America and the Caribbean? They are black but non-African. Are they part of “the problem” also?

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    11. There is some truths to sterotypes whether one wants to accept it or not. I learned this the very hard way, through experience as I used to be an idealist, not a realist. "Be as wise as a serpent and as gentle as a dove"!!

      Delete
    12. @anon8:55
      Black people are “mad at the world because they weren’t born white.” And you know this...how?

      If they’re all getting hand outs, isn’t it better to stay black and get everything for nothing rather than be white and work?

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    13. @anon9:21
      That woman should be reported to HR for unlawful discrimination. No one should tolerate it. If your company doesn’t stop it, you can file with the EEOC and get a “right to sue letter.” You can take it to court in a section 1983 lawsuit.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    14. Introibo,
      I am a retired legal Secretary and the incident above regarding "You and your LILY WHITE SKIN" happened quite a few years ago. I was working for a solo practitioner and it was just me and the other woman in the office. If I would have made an issue out of her statement to me, it would have been a very uncomfortable working situation. Plus, there were no witnesses and it would have been my word against her word. However, as I look back I wish I would have said something to the attorney we worked for as it might have given him a clue as to the type of person she was. A few months after the incident about my LILY WHITE SKIN, she took off and disappeared taking 2 checks from the escrow account!!

      Delete
    15. We see what’s the problem here. As Introibo says, it’s not the colour of the skin. The problem of black people and white people in America is Protestantism. Without the true faith, people fall into naturalism and take on a naturalistic world view. Racism is naturalistic. It’s a result of the denial of the superior importance of the supernatural order.

      —JCA

      Delete
  43. Do you believe the whole Novus Ordo is infected with heresy or only certain individuals?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon11:12
      The entire V2 sect is a man-made, non-Catholic (indeed, anti-Catholic) religion. It’s all Modernism.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  44. How do you explain the following Bible verse: John 21:7 "That disciple therefore whom Jesus loved, said to Peter: It is the Lord."
    Jesus evidentially had a favorite disciple.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon2:45
      Yes, He did. The more in conformity one is with the Will of God, the more that person loves God, and the more God returns the love. That is why the Blessed Mother is loved by God above all of creation. St. John was pure--an unmarried virgin, while the others were married. Virginity for the love of God is a higher state in life. Only St. John stood at the foot of the Cross when the other Apostles turned their backs to Christ out of fear. To St. John did Christ commit His Mother, and by extension, to the human race through St. John. He was, indeed, the disciple whom Jesus loved (especially).

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. So according to you, God can have favorite disciples, but not favorite races?

      Delete
  45. Salutations.
    What would you recommend wish school trads to do with their life?
    The modern world holds a preposterous “go to college or die”, but what is the point of going to woke, liberal, dangerous to one´s soul universities? I remember the “Perversity University” post. In Mexico universities are not as bad as on the US, but they are liberal anyway. I know that you taught in high school and went to law school, however, that was on the 1980´s, not today. Some would want to work and avoid university, but the system tries to make this things difficult.
    In Christ and Mary

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Poni,
      A person must do what he or she feels called by God to do. If you are strong in the Faith, Universities should not be a problem. After all, we need to have as much influence in law, medicine, education, etc as possible to try and turn the tide. We can’t surrender. YOU can be the doctor who convinces women not to have an abortion. YOU can be the lawyer who sues to protect the rights of Christians. YOU can be the teacher who molds students to traditional moral values.

      That having been said, there’s nothing wrong with blue collar jobs if that’s the work to which you feel God has called you. St. Joseph was a carpenter.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  46. Thank you, Introibo, for the useful article and your efforts in helping us deal with this insanity of the end times we find ourselves in.
    Why is it that Traditionalists blame the V2 apostacy on modernism only? More than that, was it not a communist coup of the Vatican? Did not the same thing happen to the U.S. governement? Or is that just another conspiracy theory to you? If it's not just a theory then why not tell it like it is to better help deluded people face reality?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anthony,
      Modernism is at the core of the problem, but there are definitely contributing factors. Communists did send in large numbers of closet sodomites to decimate the priesthood. However, many Modernists were sympathetic to “same sex attraction” and were not vigilant in getting them out when many were suspected.

      Masonry was also a big part in the Great Apostasy. Their effect on society with the idea of e.g. “separation of Church and State” was absorbed by the Modernists. They also infiltrated the Church. Not all Modernists are Masons, but all Masons are Modernists.

      Hence, there were other factors at work, but Modernism embraces and facilitated them. It was for this very reason Pope St Pius X called Modernism “the SYNTHESIS of ALL heresies.”
      He also stated Modernists were so evil they should be “beaten with fists.”

      I hope this helped answer your question!

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  47. Well, yes. You've answered with your opinion.
    You seem to be stuck in the early 20th century.
    If Pius X were here today, he wouldn't be warning about Modernism anymore.
    Freemasonry is Judaism, Bolshevism, Zionism, etc... is COMMUNISM.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anthony,
      You've responded with your opinion as well. That's all any of us can do, and mine is based on the teachings of the Church, as well as first hand accounts of what went on at the Robber Council.

      However, you KNOW (with apodictic certainty) what Pope St. Pius X would be doing in 2020, and Communism is the bugbear. Sounds like a JBS pamphlet gone overboard.

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. The Vatican II sect has been infiltrated by every type of "ism", ecumenism, protestantism, communism, paganism, masonism, etc. Every "ism" seems to be practiced in the Vatican II sect, except Traditional Catholicism!

      Delete
    3. Who cares whether modernism and communism and judaism are the cause of Vatican II? The important thing is that we must exterminate that repugnant sect. Useless discussions between sedes only help the great apostasy.

      Delete
  48. Those in denial are part of the problem.

    JBS is Freemasonic.

    There were unpublished council schemas condemning communism at Vatican II, a plan to launch a global offensive against communism, which was connivingly squashed by liberals and cowards.

    58. See to it, Venerable Brethren, that the Faithful do not allow themselves to be deceived! Communism is intrinsically wrong, and no one who would save Christian civilization may collaborate with it in any undertaking whatsoever. Those who permit themselves to be deceived into lending their aid towards the triumph of Communism in their own country, will be the first to fall victims of their error. And the greater the antiquity and grandeur of the Christian civilization in the regions where Communism successfully penetrates, so much more devastating will be the hatred displayed by the godless.
    Divini Redemptoris
    On Atheistic Communism
    POPE PIUS XI - 1937
    https://www.papalencyclicals.net/pius11/p11divin.htm

    So you have no fear of another Communist bloodbath?

    Please share with us how you can rationalize such courage.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anthony,
      There's a difference between recognizing an enemy of the Church, and the principle enemy of the Church--indeed, all humanity. That would be Satan, and Communism rests on the principles of Modernism, not vice versa. Those documents were scuttled at the Council not by Communists but by Modernists who enable Communism.

      Pope St. Pius X," Still it must be confessed that the number of the enemies of the cross of Christ has in these last days increased exceedingly, who are striving, by arts, entirely new and full of subtlety, to destroy the vital energy of the Church, and, if they can, to overthrow utterly Christ's kingdom itself...And now, can anybody who takes a survey of the whole system be surprised that We should define it as the synthesis of all heresies? Were one to attempt the task of collecting together all the errors that have been broached against the faith and to concentrate the sap and substance of them all into one, he could not better succeed than the Modernists have done. Nay, they have done more than this, for, as we have already intimated, their system means the destruction not of the Catholic religion alone but of all religion." (See "Pascendi Dominici Gregis, para #1 and 39).

      It was AFTER Modernism that Communism arose; a result of those pernicious doctrines.

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. Anthony,
      JBS rests on Naturalism, like Masonry. Yet they blame everything on Communism.

      See my post, http://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2015/05/attempting-naturalistic-solution-to.html

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  49. @ poni albinegro 6:06
    And how are you going to do that if you don't know the cause and your enemy?
    What is useless is sedes endlessly engaged in criticizing the effects.
    Is that what you want to continue to discuss?
    Over 50 years of criticizing..
    How's that working out for you?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Poni is aware of the problem and Traditionalists are trying to do the best we can to make our Catholic way through the Great Apostasy. Extermination is the solution. We need to try and unify and achieve an imperfect general council to restore the papacy.

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. You are committing a false dilemma. Just because we believe that communism is not the only problem, that does not mean we think it is less problematic because of that.

      Delete
    3. Don't understand how the Vatican wasn't stormed by the people at or shortly after Vatican II? Why did the people allow this council to occur and the Novus Ordo to be instituted? It seems 50+ years later is a little to late to over throw it by a "general imperfect council" as the Sedes are split and can't seem to agree on much of anything and unity seems unlikely as a result. The Vatican II sect is "going to the bank" and laughing the whole way at the lack of unity among the Traditionalists. Whether it be pride, ego or political, Satan is at the bottom of the lack of unity and the Sedes especially have given into him by allowing and perpetrating division.

      Delete
    4. @anon9:17
      An imperfect general council is the answer, but you are correct about the unfortunate division among Traditionalists preventing same from occurring.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  50. Anthony,
    1. We know how to save our souls with the Integral Catholic Faith and True Mass and Sacraments.

    2. If God gave us a true pope again, we could have a united front against the V2 sect. Yes, they stole the word “Catholic” so I use “Traditionalist” to distinguish and get people interested to ask questions and proselytize.

    3. The devil would indeed be running scared with a renewed Church. With God all things are possible.

    4. Again, the historical record clearly shows Modernism paving the way for Communism, not vice-versa.

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  51. Researchers have proven a genetic basis for the distinction between the races on Earth. That people still persist in simplifying those differences to mere shades of skin color is disingenuous nonsense. Tay-Sachs and sickle cell anemia are great examples for the medical and genetic basis for races. Bone structure, bone density (the reason blacks are not as adept at swimming), eyes, noses, and other physical characteristics make clear the distinctions at a glance. That is, we have empirical evidence "under the hood" of racial differences as well as easily observable distinctions. And this is not touching IQ variation--which is a truth but one that is rejected by so many because it is not PC enough.

    Also, the Tower of Babel is a refutation of the current multiracial societies we all exist in today. They are unhealthy, unnatural, and ungodly. They exist to divide us from one another. Chinese and African and European are not meant to live on the same continent let alone the same town.

    The fact that these multiracial societies are all in European countries is not by accident, either. The fact that we have multiracial and mixed race societies already--and they are all terrible places--in places like "Latin America" should teach us some lessons. But no, we must be fine with mass immigration and our displacement in our homes.

    Sorry, but wanting a space for my people to thrive and not to be forced to live alongside alien races is not racist. It is natural. It is how the Christian world has existed for thousands of years. It is only now in the age of the airplane and the godless world that multiracialism is a thing. It is simply yet another Satanic phenomenon born out of the minds of his synagogue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ian (or do you prefer “Adolph”),

      1. There are differences in races just as there are differences in different types of birds, yet they are birds nevertheless.

      2. The Tower of Babel was God’s way of helping humans at the time. By changing one language into many, He separated nations more effectively than any Wall of Mexico. God stepped in to prevent the human race from falling under the sway of a single, absolute tyrant over all the earth. It refutes nothing.

      3. While some black populations do have a higher average bone density and mass than whites—about 300gm—buoyancy varies for every swimmer, and differences within races are far greater than those between them. As Matt Bridge, senior lecturer in coaching and sports science at Birmingham University, points out: “Thousands of black Americans have taken the US Marines’ compulsory swimming test and none have failed.” (See https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/black-men-can-swim)

      4. “Alien races.” Yes, I wouldn’t want to be near Martians either. Now, please hurry up and get your sheets washed before the next Klan rally. Praying for your conversion

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. Introibo, or do you prefer "Mordechai" whoever you are...,

      Your comparison to birds is absurd. If you want to start talking about animals then you cannot deny each species remain exclusively segregated.

      You know what Ian meant by "alien".
      Your sarcasm fails.

      KKK were Freemasonic.

      Delete
    3. Introibo,
      You evidently have led a very sheltered life, or are politically correct to the max. I am originally from a very small town where there were no different races. I was a clean slate so to speak regarding various races. I was open minded and didn't have a prejudice or discriminatory thought toward any race. Upon moving to a City, I became the victim of one crime after another upon my person by a certain race. I then became very untrustful of that race and am still today. I don't care to be around them, or have anything to do with them. They MADE me have the attitude I have toward them. I wish them no harm and pray for their conversion, however, I don't want to become victimized by this so called race ever again.

      Delete
    4. @Anthony,
      Anti-Semitic as well as racist. Nice. My comparison is therefore on target. Different races can have children the same as different breeds of the same species.

      My sarcasm fails but your ignorance and hatred never do.

      KKK were Freemasonic, not Communist? In either event they are hateful racists.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    5. @anon12:19
      As a lifelong New Yorker in his mid-50s, I am
      Not sheltered. As a Traditionalist for 39 years in November, I’m not PC. I’m sorry for what you went through but what if you were the victim of crime by poor whites in the city?

      You do not have to live where it makes you feel uncomfortable and you do have the Catholic attitude of forgiveness.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    6. See how quickly people have been programmed to respond to any level-headed discussion of race and its reality as literal Nazis? The flippant nature of the author's use of such a slur betrays the author as an unserious person on par with the modern SJW, for it is their wont to scream Nazi at everyone who disagrees with them.

      The fact that you are a long term/lifelong New Yorker speaks volumes. That city has been a disgusting den of depravity for generations. Living in such an environment no doubt has affected you. I am so glad that I have not had to live in such an unnatural and offensive environment.

      Your rush to label things as racist and anti-semitic is really all anyone needs to see to know how silly you are deep down. The fact that you have avoided the state of the Church for thousands of years existing as a strong entity among racially and ethnically segregated people and never once demanding that they live together or intermix is something you fail to address because you can't. It is the post-Vatican II sect that demands Europe accept millions of Africans and Arabs. Show me the medieval Pope who made similar demands.

      Delete
    7. @Ian,
      The remarks you made fly in the face of Church teaching regarding racism. Go back and read my post above, esp the Instruction of 1938. Your comment was one of racial segregation and superiority. No, the Church does NOT DEMAND that races mix, NOR DOES SHE CONDEMN IT.

      The Vatican II sect is wrong in forcing countries to take on people they either can’t handle or could be Islamic terrorists.

      NYC is decadent, but it has taught me the truth that there is good and bad in all people.
      —-Introibo

      Delete
    8. The statistics you have quoted are not for the City in which I reside. My City is through the roof with minority crime - one of the worst in the Country. However, the minority are not going to be the minority much longer as the whites have to move further from the City so they don't caught in the cross fire. People are now being shot in broad daylight as well as night. Thus, the minority is becoming the majority at a very fast pace. Everyone seems to be so afraid of the politically correct crowd that it was announced in the news here last week that the minority in this City doesn't want their crime statistics published as people won't want to visit or go into the City!! I guess now we need to cover up or not speak of the crime perpetrated by minorities.

      Delete
    9. @anon6:12
      Statistical data collected by the FBI in 2016 reported that 90.1 percent of black homicide victims were killed by black perpetrators. Similarly, 83.5 percent of white homicide victims were killed by other whites, a figure comparable to that for black victims.

      See https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-43

      Data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics maintains that less than one percent of all black Americans commit a violent crime in any given year, which, stated differently, means that 99 percent of black Americans do not commit crimes

      See https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=datool&surl=/arrests/index.cfm#

      So we have competing statistics, yet overall crime goes down for ALL ethnicities when poverty goes down.

      Your “genetic component” has most serious theological implications. Are you suggesting that African-Americans MUST act on a “shooting” gene? Free will and sin must go. If you’re claiming it’s an inclination, it can be overcome by the practice of the Faith. Likewise, an “alcoholic gene” has been proposed yet it has no more confirmation than the “shooting gene.”

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  52. 1. If such is the case, why are a billion in the V2 sect outside of the Faith?

    2. It only helps to petition the Lord for a true pope. I do everyday. Yes, I think that would be a proper new name, "Traditional Catholicism".

    3. That statement seems to imply that there is strength in numbers. I can't disagree with that. And this unity would finally be attractive to those sitting on the fence.
    But remember, even before the wicked council, the Church was strong in unity, yet there was still Christian persecution. The devil wasn't running. He was devouring souls.

    4. Again, it should not matter if one came before the other. If I were born before you, does that make me superior to you today?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1. Because the vast majority grew up post-V2 and don’t realize what was taken; hence the reason for this blog.

      4. It would make you older. However, if you were older AND my father, you would be the cause of me. Modernism was the impetus for dialectical materialism which is the basis of Marxism.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  53. Here's my 2 cents. It's crazy to me how a Traditional Catholic blog post condemning racism is getting so many comments. Its first grade stuff here. We are called to love all people and pray for all people. People tend to mix race with things like culture, moral upbringing and religion. They dont seem to make distinctions. I would say the media contributed greatly to racism in this country, and as far as wanting to be with ones own race that's all well and good. It's one thing to say that Zionism and freemasonic Jews are a problem, and another say Jews are a problem. People tend to generalize a little to much which can lead to scandal. While there might be differences in race, we are all created in the image and likeness of God, and anyone who genuinely dislikes or hates another race is immoral. I mean most black guys are probably faster than short white me, but I dont have any ill feelings toward them or myself. And to the comment about the historical segregation of the Church, it's a moot point. When did St. Catherine have a chance to board a plane? When did St. Thomas ride a train? People tend to stay where they were for economic, cultural and social reasons. Could people up and get a new job in China on a whim? It would have been extremely risky and dangerous to just relocate unlike today, where I can interview for a job overseas online and have a stable base to move there. It took years to travel places sometimes, why risk your whole livelihood relocating when you can stay in Europe? Again it's one thing to say a racial joke or something similar in jest without the risk of scandal,(think Jews and noses) and another to harbor I'll feelings toward another race in your heart.

    David.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. David,
      Thank you. I never thought this post would bring out so many comments over things to which no Traditionalist Catholic should object. What you said is truth!

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. David,

      It is not the condemning of "racism" that is the issue. No one is arguing that one group is "better" or "superior". The issue is that race is real. We are all humans, but we are not one race. That is medically, genetically, scientifically, observably, historically, culturally demonstrable. And it is a tactic of the Satanic left to boot. Surely you know of the Kalergi Plan? Surely you have seen the Jews in marketing and Hollywood thrust black man-white woman interracial couples at the public in every ad and *program* possible. There is an agenda at work, a top-down agenda, and to ignore it and to echo Satanic "Jewish" propaganda is NOT a good Catholic look.

      As for travel: you are wrong. Despite the ease of flying and whatnot today, the overwhelming majority of people still tend to stay near where they were born--outside of holidays. The issue here is that now we have NGOs and other Jewish apparatus that ensure foreign populations are transplanted into European societies to disrupt them and displace them. See Somalis in Minnesota and Maine. See Burmese in Indiana. See Chinese in Vancouver and BC. This is all done on purpose.

      You are completely unable to see the forest of this issue for its trees. And it is because you, like the blog's author, have been programmed by Satanists to balk at any open discussion of race. It is very sad. Multiracialism and multiculturalism are evil. Flat out.

      Delete
    3. Ian, perhaps you misunderstand what I mean. Like I said in the comment, people tend to stay where they are for social, cultural and economic reason, and this still holds true until today. The difference is that immigration is totally different in that in todays world, it is not as big a risk to immigrate to another country like it was in years past. Like you said people like to stay within their own comfort zone, so Filipinos tend to immigrate to warm states like California where there is a large Filipino community in which they connect. I live in Minnesota and know all about the Somali population. Most of them are Muslim, which is the basis for their behavior. Criminal behavior has more to do with religious, cultural and moral upbringing than anything else. I've worked with many "ghetto" people, I'm married to a Filipina, my sister-in-law is black, I'm white, and I dont see any of them differently than myself. Also as my comment above said, it's ok to talk about race, or problems with certain races such as Jews, but the context is needed in order to avoid scandal. I think I know what you mean when you say "the jews" but others might not. And the problem with the over-simplification of races tends to be an interior effect on the heart. Your last statement means my family is "evil" because we are not all white. That is my point, you have gone from one premise to a radical conclusion. To say that multiracialism is evil is ridiculous. My brother and his black wife and kids are practicing Traditional Catholics, so are me and my wife and son. I have a different culture than my wife, we have different traditions and customs, but we have the same Faith. If you want to talk about "black","hip-hop", or other negative cultures within a certain race that's fine, because there lies the root of why we see certain problems within certain races. Unfortunately your last statement speaks volumes and I think proves the point were making. You have gone of to say that you dont dislike another race based solely on race, but then say multiracialism is evil? So then how do you have a leg to stand on? Just because the Chinese in Vancouver have different customs and traditions than you, doesnt mean they are inherently bad. If you want to complain about policy that displaces, or forces immigrants to certain places that fine, but to have a grudge against the said race that is being moved "on purpose" is entirely different. Again it's more about the morality of a culture and religion, within a certain race. But thanks for letting me know my multiracial family is evil...

      David.

      Delete
    4. David,
      You’re a blessed man to have a Traditionalist Catholic family! Don’t let the racial hatred of Ian and his ilk disturb you. We will pray for him and those like him.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    5. Destruction of races and racial distinctions via miscegenation is every bit as much a part of their plan as destruction of families.

      Your mixed race children have a schizophrenic identity at best and no identity at worst. The data and experience bear this out. It is a sad state when human beings have no tribe.

      You and your brother performed exactly as Kalergi wanted.

      Delete
    6. @anon5:84
      I posted your comment so my readers can see what hateful whackos are out there. Notice “destruction of races” as part of “their Plan”—who’s that? Let me guess: Jews? Communists? Freemasons?

      David and his brother have practicing Traditionalist Catholic families. If there were more of people like David and his family and less like you—the world would be a better place. The Church has ALWAYS allowed marriages of mixed races.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    7. Anon @5:48 I never heard or read of the Kalergi plan. However, I remember my Mother saying back in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s that the majority of people in the future would not be white, but “mulatto” from the black and white race intermarrying. I am on the fence regarding “race” as we have all descended from Adam and Eve. However, I also realize that something is terribly wrong with the amount of crime being perpetrated in the City in which I reside by minorities. There seems to be no end in sight for the escalating crime and killings, destruction to the City itself, and no one can seem to devise a plan to stop it. I am sure the minority perpetrators have all heard the Ten Commandments - thou shall not kill - thou shall not steal, etc. Something is terribly amiss.

      Delete
    8. To the anonymous person who replied, just save your babbling for the next cross burning Adolph.

      My son's identity will be that of a Catholic, an adopted son of God through Our Lord Jesus Christ. There is no plan to destroy whites, there is however a war raging against the Church, of which you and your racists ideas do not belong sadly. Have a nice day.

      David.

      Delete
  54. What do you exactly mean by "hate"? Do you mean wanting to do harm? I dislike a certain race as a whole, does that make me a hater? I wish them no harm and hope for their conversion. However, I dislike them.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Hate is an emotion. It becomes sin when acted upon.

    ReplyDelete
  56. @anon2:07
    Wrong. We can sin against God’s Commandments in THOUGHT, word, or deed.

    According to Theologians McHugh and Callan, “Hatred , whether of dislike or of enmity, if from its nature a mortal sin, since it is directly opposed to the virtue of charity which is the life of the soul.” (See “Moral Theology” 1: 519).

    Lust is an emotion. Are not impure thoughts alone mortal sin? “But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh. on a woman to lust after her hath committed. adultery with her already in his heart.“ (See St. Matthew 5:28).

    Just perseveration on the thoughts brought on by lust are sinful, even if not acted upon. So too hateful thoughts. Dislike is warranted when someone has inflicted evil upon you, and is not sinful as long as you do not wish their damnation and pray for their conversion. If they do not ask forgiveness you need not associate with them.

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  57. "Lust is an emotion. Are not impure thoughts alone mortal sin? “But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh. on a woman to lust after her hath committed. adultery with her already in his heart.“ (See St. Matthew 5:28).

    If a lustful thought is a mortal sin, then one might as well act upon it. What you are implying doesn't even make good sense.

    ReplyDelete
  58. @3:36
    Then you have a problem with the Church, not me. I cited approved theologians McHugh and Callan and Our Lord Himself. Why not act upon the emotions? Thoughts That become actions, will become acts that are repeated and form our character; which ultimately will become our destiny.

    According to Theologian Jone, “Unchaste DESIRES are always sins of the same gravity and moral species as the action which is sinfully desired.” (See “Moral Theology “ (1961), pg. 159; Emphasis mine).

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  59. What about the Bible verse:"Be angry and sin not"? Anger is an emotion and it does not become sin until acted upon.

    ReplyDelete
  60. @anon4:36
    Anger can be RIGHTEOUS, unlike most emotions. We should be angered by injustice done to us and others, which will motivate us to moral action to correct the problem. There is no righteous lusting after others, or righteous hatred, EXCEPT hatred for sin.

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  61. How is Lust different than Temptation?

    ReplyDelete
  62. Proverbs 6:16-19 Lists 6 things the Lord HATES. I would call that "righteous hatred".

    ReplyDelete
  63. @anon4:04
    Temptation is when such thoughts and feelings are positively fought against, not consented to, and not dwelt upon. In lust, the feelings and thoughts are willfully entertained and pleasure is taken therein.

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  64. Lust is an appetite like hunger, thirst, etc. It becomes disordered when it becomes an obsession or excessive just as hunger can lead one to gluttony. If we didn't lust at all we wouldn't be human. Taking a puritian stance on lust and trying to deny it will only have it come out in a sideways fashion.

    ReplyDelete
  65. @anon6:46
    Go and read what I write above and what the approved theologians wrote. There is no sin if there is no consent. You must make every effort to curb your passion. Any directly willed sexual pleasure outside of marriage is mortal sin. This is NOT my opinion. It is the teaching of the Church.

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  66. You are assuming that everyone who has lust is taking pleasure in it.

    ReplyDelete
  67. @anon9:34
    I assume nothing. I have outlined the teaching of the Church through Her approved theologians. If someone is not taking pleasure in it they are resisting it which is both moral and praiseworthy.

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  68. What about "hating" the Novus Ordo and Vatican II? Is that "righteous hatred"?

    ReplyDelete
  69. @anon10:44
    Yes it is. Remember that hating SIN—-That Which is opposed to God—-is morally praiseworthy. You described righteous hatred.

    —-Introibo

    ReplyDelete
  70. How would you like your daughter to marry an Arab/Terrorist?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anyone who thinks there is not some truth to stereotypes is not grounded, but has their heads in the clouds and lacks common sense.

      Delete
    2. @anon2:25
      I’m trying right now! The Internet can be a powerful tool for good.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    3. I mean in person,not hiding behind a website.

      Delete
    4. @anon6:12
      I have spoken to several Arab lawyers about Traditionalism here in NYC. One actually requested additional information.

      I’m not “hiding” behind a website; it is a modern means to proselytize.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    5. Try going to the Middle East and proselytizing. That is alot different than talking to NY Arab Lawyers. Also,I thought you were against modernism.

      Delete
    6. I thought you were for Christ and His Charity. You are judging IAAD. Have you gone to proselytize to the arabs? Maybe stop looking at what IAAD is not doing and look at what you are lacking.

      I do not know if you have proselytized to the arabs, but if you have not, then you should stop talking, and creating controversy for the sake of controversy. If you have, then good.

      Tell me where can we see that IAAD is a modernist. If he has acted like a modernist, then correct him, don´t waste time talking about the arabs.

      Delete
    7. @anon7:41
      I am against Modernism; I’m a true Traditionalist Catholic? Where do I suggest anything even remotely Modernist??

      Would I go to the Middle East? No, the religion and behaviors that flow from them are evil.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    8. "I am not “hiding” behind a website; it is a modern means to proselytize."
      The above "modern" is what I was referring to.
      You state you "would not go to the Middle East" as "the religion and behaviors that flow from them are evil". Yes, I agree the religion and behaviors are evil. Who do you think are perpetrating the evil behaviors?? Isn't it a certain group/race of people?

      Delete
    9. Poni, I am not judging anyone. I know Introibo is a Traditional Catholic. I was referring to his use of the term "modern means to proslyetize", that's all. I thought his use of the term "modern" humorous, nothing more. Sorry, I didn't clarify.
      If Introibo, objects to "talking about Arabs", he shouldn't be doing a post on "Racism".

      Delete
    10. @anon12:08
      Sorry for not getting the joke about “Modernism”! Yes, the evil false prophet Mohammed unfortunately brought most Arabs under his dominion. There are however, Coptic Christians. Also, you might want to read a fascinating book by an Arab and former Mohammedan named Nabeel Qureshi. He was asked by his Imam to write a book “debunking” the Bible and Christianity and “proving” the truth of Islam. The result? His studies convinced him that the Koran was false and the Bible was true! See his book “Seeking Allah, Finding Jesus.” A great read!

      If it were not for V2, he might have become a Catholic!!

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    11. Poni,
      Thank you for always looking to stand up for what is right! This time I think the person was just misunderstood by us. He seems of good will.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    12. Introibo,
      Thanks for referring the book. I will read it. I have spent time in the Middle East and believe me when I tell you the majority of the Arab/Muslim behaviors are evil. After witnessing their behavior first hand and, also becoming a victim, I kept questioning if they had a conscience! It was that bad, unfortunately.

      Delete
    13. @anon2:17
      Unfortunately, I can believe what a group of thugs and barbarians Mohammedans are; it is with good reason we pray for those “still involved in the darkness of idolatry or of Islamism.” See also my post http://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2018/10/islamophobia-or-misogyny.html?m=1

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    14. Sorry anon, if you felt offended. I can see that indeed, you have experienced the mohammedans.

      Misunderstandings are easy in this "complex and diverse" word.

      Delete
  71. Introibo, what's evil with having the whole world united under one government and nation?

    ReplyDelete