Monday, February 17, 2025

God The Almighty And The Commandments Of God

 


To My Readers: This week's post, by John Gregory, explains what it means to follow an Almighty God, as well as the importance and duty of following the Ten Commandments. 

Feel free to comment as usual. If you have  a specific comment or question for me, I will respond as always, but it may take me a bit longer to do so this week.

God bless you all, my dear readers---Introibo

God The Almighty and The Commandments of God
By John Gregory
But the men wondered, saying What manner of man is this, for the winds and the sea obey him. 
(St. Matthew 8: 27)  

These men were not the disciples, but the sailors and others who were in the ship of Jesus, and in the other ships which accompanied it.  For, as Origen says, “The disciples are never named but with the mark of distinction, Apostles, or disciples.”  Saint Jerome adds, “If anyone maintains that the disciples are meant here, the reply should be that they are called men, because they have not yet known the Savior’s power.  What manner of man? “Who and what sort of man is this, and whose messenger?  He does not seem to be like other men, but a Being of a different race.  He does not seem to be born of earth, but to have come down from heaven, for not only the denizens of the earth and their sicknesses obey him, but also the heavens and their winds, as though he were their master and lord. (For the Greek text has, “For the winds and the sea heed him, submit to him.”)  Who, therefore, is this new Aeolus [“god”] in Palestine, what sort of wind-god is he, and how great his power command?”  Thus they thought, not yet knowing Christ to be the one true God. 

Topologically, Saint Augustine says, “Imitate the winds and the sea: obey the creator at Christ’s command.  The sea listens, and you are deaf?  The sea heeds, and the wind stops, and you blast? — What?  I speak, I act, I devise. — What is that, if not being puffed up, and at Christ’s word you are unwilling to cease?  Let not the waves overcome you in the commotion of your hearts.” (See Lapide Commentary on Saint Matthew Volume one, pages 419 and 420) 

God created us and maintains us in existence.  Therefore, we should know Him, and this knowledge of Him should lead to a filial fear and love of Him.  We should fear Him, because it is He Who can make us healthy or sick, rich or poor, happy or sad.  But more importantly, it is He who can damn us to Hell or give us eternal happiness.  This love of God should lead to the latria – the worship and adoration reserved for God alone – as the Introit of the Mass (the form of worship God prescribed for us and highest form of worship possible in this life) for the fourth Sunday after Epiphany suggests: 

Adore God, All you His angels: Sion heard, and was glad; and the daughters of Juda rejoiced.  The Lord hath reigned; let the earth rejoice: let many islands be glad (Psalm 96: 7, 8)  

The Mass is the greatest prayer this side of heaven.  This public worship in common is the best way to strengthen the sanctifying grace in our souls.  The Mass is God Himself (Jesus) offering Himself to God (the Father) in the unity of the Holy Ghost.  It is the one sacrifice of the cross made present to us in an unbloody manner which is used to apply the fruits of that sacrifice to the benefit of our souls.  Prescribed prayer in public is strong and effective as there is strength in numbers.  We collectively pierce the heavens to rain down graces upon us, such as detachment from worldly goods, if we pray in unison with sincerity, devotion and confidence.  The prayer in the above mentioned Fourth Sunday after the Epiphany Mass gives such an example: 

O God, Who knowest that we are beset by perils so great as to be unendurable because of our human frailty, grant us health of mind and body, so that by Thine assistance we may conquer the things with which we are afflicted because of our sins. 

This is why praying to Rosary together in large groups and in the family is so very important for individual souls as well as for the world as a whole.  Our Lady of Lourdes and Fatima, who saw the increasing moral depravity that would fall upon the world along with the lack of valid Masses, bishops and priests, which provide the ordinary means of obtaining, fortifying and increasing sanctifying grace in this world, left us with her Rosary and brown scapular to cling to in this barren wasteland of what appears to be the end times. 

Some Protestants our fond of claiming that “they are saved."  As if they need not fear Hell so long as they believe.  They claim to get this belief, (faith alone) from the bible, their sole rule of faith (bible alone).  Yet the bible did not give itself to us.  It did not write itself.  It did not decide which books belong in it and which do not.  The Catholic Church gave it to us, wrote the New Testament, preserved the Old and decided which books belong and which do not.  The bible also does not interpret itself.  Guess who does that.  God through His Catholic Church which was founded upon the rock of Peter does that.  She (the Catholic Church) guards and preserves the deposit of faith and infallibly explicates it for the ears and the hearts of the faithful.  That is why the Chosen People, those within the Catholic Church, do not put their souls in peril through heretical beliefs such as “faith alone”, “the bible alone”, “faith without works”.   

Ah.  That is why in the Mass we are looking at has in the Epistle for the day the following: 

Brethren, owe no man anything, but to love one another; for he that loveth his neighbor hath fulfilled the law.  For thou shalt not commit adultery, thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not bear false witness, thou shalt not covet, and if there be any other commandment, it is comprised in this word, thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.  The love of our neighbor worketh no evil.  Love, therefore, is the fulfilling of the law.  (Romans 13: 8 – 10) 

The above passage is in the bibles Protestants use.  I do not use the term “Protestant bible” as that is a contradiction of terms.  For the Protestants ripped out seven books and parts of two others from the bible and mistranslate much of what they left in on their own authority.  Their bible, which is their sole rule of faith, and which they claim to understand and interpret correctly, tells them they must keep the Commandments for salvation to be possible.  For as Saint Paul explains above if we truly love our neighbor, we will not cheat on them, or kill them, or lie to them, or covet what they have, or do, or will any evil to them.  If we authentically love our neighbor as God wills and commands, we will keep the Commandments as a result of that love.  Yes, God indeed is almighty and we must obey His Commandments if we wish to have eternal life.  And obeying His Commandments will give us great joy even in this life as the Gradual for this Mass states: 

The Gentiles shall fear Thy name, O Lord, and all the kings of the earth Thy glory.  For the Lord hath built up Sion, and He shall be seen in His majesty.  The Lord hath reigned, let the earth rejoice: let many islands be glad.  (Psalm 101: 16, 17) 

No one on earth is glad or rejoices if they do not keep the Commandments.  The worm that will gnaw at the conscience of those outside the Catholic Church and or lacking sanctifying grace for all eternity gnaws as it does now even with all the distractions of this life, and when they are alone with their thoughts, they wonder why they are not really happy.  For their pleasures are momentary and not fulfilling. 

Atheists and Agnostics often claim not to believe in God because if He existed, He would not allow all the terrible things we see going on around us and to us in the world today.  But what did God the Father allow to happen to God His Son?  To be born in poverty, to be hated and misunderstood during His whole public life, to be spat upon, beaten, scourged, crowned with thorns and nailed to a cross to die a most ignominious death between two thieves.  But we refuse to believe in God because something bad happened to us or to someone we love, or to countless innocent victims?  I believe the real reason they chose not to believe stems from fear.  They know the lifestyle they live would be at odds with God if He exists and that they will be damned to Hell if He exists.  So, they just convince themselves He doesn’t exist.  Much easier huh.  In time perhaps.  But not in eternity, which lasts a bit longer than our life on earth.  They should be afraid not to follow the Lord.  For though doing so can lead to temporary tribulations it ultimately will lead to eternal bliss.  What follows is the Gospel of this Mass: 

At That time, when Jesus entered into the ship, His disciples followed Him.  And behold a great tempest arose in the sea, so that the ship was covered with waves, but He was asleep.  And they came to Him and awaked Him, saying, Lord, save us, we perish.  And Jesus saith to them, Why are ye fearful, O ye of little faith?  Then rising up, He commanded the winds and the sea, and there came a great calm.  But the men wondered, saying, What manner of man is this, for the winds and the see obey Him. 

This shows that our best option is not only to believe in Jesus, but to follow Him.  If we follow Him we may have trials and tribulations, but they can be meritorious and exchanged for eternal crowns.  Let us look at the offertory of the Mass:  

The right hand of the Lord hath wrought strength, the right hand of the Lord hath exalted me: I shall not die, but live, and shall declare the works of the Lord. (Psalm 117: 16, 17) 

Do you notice how the Propers of this Mass continually extol God’s mightiness?  

Secret: Grant, we beseech Thee, almighty God, that this sacrifice offered to Thee, may purge us of all evil and fortify our weak nature. 

Here we see how almighty God may cleanse of [venial] sin and fortify with us with additional graces if we worship at Mass with devotion. 

Communion: They all wondered at these things, which proceeded from the mouth of God. (Luke 4: 22) 

Every day at holy Mass, we get catholicized as the foundations of the Faith, such as the reiteration of the power of God which can help us in our temporal and eternal needs. 

Postcommunion: May Thy gifts, O God, free us from the allurements of earthly things, and ever restore us with heavenly nourishment. 

Again, detachment from worldly things get reemphasized in our minds and the reminder that we are in continual need of renewal for we are quite often guilty of venial sins and imperfections.  We never can rest on our laurels or we will drift away, we must continually strive for holiness.  Never getting too down when we fall, nor prideful when we are doing well.  See Pope Saint Gregory the Great: 

"We refresh the body lest it should grow too weak and fail us; we chasten it by abstinence, lest it should wax gross, and become lord over us; we strengthen it with exercise, lest it perish by the not using; and straightway we give it rest, lest it faint through weariness; we succor it with raiment, lest the cold should blight it; and we strip it of the raiment wherewith we have clothed it, lest the heat should afflict it.  In all these so many offices what do we but serve the corruptible?  Upon what is all this care spent but upon that whereover hangeth the doom of weakness and change? "

Therefor saint Paul tells: For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of Hm Who hath subjected the same in hope because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. (Romans 8: 20).  The creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly for when man had of his own free will abdicated his state of unchangeable blessedness, the just sentence of death was passed upon him, and whether he willed or not, he became subject to the state of change and corruption.  But the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption when it shall rise again incorruptible and be made partaker of the glory of the children of God. 

Where, then, the elect are still subject to sorrow, being yet bound by the sentence of corruption; but when we shall have put off this corruptible we shall be loosed from that sentence, and shall sorrow no more.  For though we earnestly desire to appear before God, we are still hindered by the burden of this dying body.  Rightly then are we called prisoners, since we are not free to go whither we will, that is to say, to God; and rightly did the prisoner Paul, yearning after the things which are eternal, and still weighed down with the burden of this corruptible, rightly did he cry out I have a desire to depart and to be with Christ. (Philippians 1: 23) He would not have felt this keenness if he had not felt himself bound down. 

Saint Jerome as well, may have a word of interest to us: 

The fifth sign that He did was when He took ship at Capernaum, and commanded the winds and the sea the sixth, when, in the country of the Gergesenes, He suffered the devils to enter into the swine the seventh, when, as He came into His own city, He cured the man sick of the palsy lying on a bed.  The first man sick of the palsy that He cured was the centurion’s servant. 

But He was asleep; and His disciples came to Him, and awoke Him, saying Lord, save us.  There is a type of this in the history of Jonah, who, when the storm arose, was lying fast asleep, and whom the sailors woke to help them; who also saved the sailors by commanding them to throw him into the sea, the said casting of him into the sea, being, as we know, a figure of Christ’s Passion.  Then He arose and rebuked the winds and the sea.  From these words we understand that all things, which have been made, are sentient to their Maker.  All things which He rebuketh or commandeth, hear His voice.  This is not the error of the heretics who will have it that everything is quick, but part of the majesty of the Creator, Who maketh to feel Him things which we cannot make to feel us. 

But the men marveled, saying what manner of man is this, that even the winds and the sea obey Him?  It was not His disciples that marveled, but the sailors, and the others that were in the ship.  If however, any one willeth to withstand this our interpretation and to maintain that it was the disciples who marveled, we are ready to answer them that they who knew not before the power of the Saviour deserve to be stripped of the title of disciples, and to be called simply the men. 

A disciple is one who follows Christ by keeping His Commandments.  When trying to obey the Commandments the understanding that God is Almighty can be very helpful. 

And fear ye not them that kill the body, and are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him that can destroy both soul and body in hell. (Matthew 10: 28) 

The Arabic has “into the fire of hell.”  The sense is: Do not, from fear of death with which the persecutors will threaten you, deny My Faith, or cease from the preaching which I have commanded you, or commit any act unworthy of it, for if ye do this, ye will incur both the death of the body and the far worse and longer-lasting death of the soul, even its eternal death in hell, where the damned die an undying death, because they are constantly living in mortal torments and endure as though in living death and moribund life, according to Isaias 66: 24, Their worm shall not die, and their fire shall not be quenched.  Truly does Saint Chrysostom say, “He who is always afraid of hell will never fall into its flams, for he is continually purified by this fear. (See Lapide Commentary on Saint Matthew Volume one, pages 502 and 503) 

For a better understanding of the term “Almighty” and how that should resonate with those truly devoted to God, let us take a look at the beloved Catechism of Trent (COT): 

“Almighty” 

The Sacred Scriptures, in order to mark the piety and devotion with which the most holy name of God is to be adored, usually express His supreme power and infinite majesty in a variety of ways; but the pastor should, first of all, teach that almighty power is most frequently attributed to Him. Thus He says of Himself: I am the almighty Lord; (Genesis 17: 1) and again, Jacob when sending his sons to Joseph thus prayed for them: May my almighty God make him favourable to you. (Genesis 43: 14) In the Apocalypse also it is written: The Lord God, who is, and who was, and who is to come, the almighty; (Apocalypse 1: 8) and in another place the last day is called the great day of the almighty God.  Sometimes the same attribute is expressed in many words; thus: No word shall be impossible with God; (Luke 1: 37) Is the hand of the Lord unable? (Numbers 11: 23) Thy power is at hand when thou wilt, (Wisdom 12: 18) and so on.  

MEANING OF THE TERM “ALMIGHTY” 

From these various modes of expression it is clearly perceived what is comprehended under this single word almighty.  By it we understand that there neither exists nor can be conceived in thought or imagination anything which God cannot do.  For not only can He annihilate all created things, and in a moment summon from nothing into existence many other worlds, an exercise of power which, however great, comes in some degree within our comprehension; but He can do many things still greater, of which the human mind can form no conception. 

But though God can do all things, yet He cannot lie, or deceive, or be deceived; He cannot sin, or cease to exist, or be ignorant of anything.  These defects are compatible with those beings only whose actions are imperfect; but God, whose acts are always most perfect, is said to be incapable of such things, simply because that capability of doing them implies weakness, not the supreme and infinite power over all things which God possesses.  Thus we so believe God to be omnipotent that we exclude from Him entirely all that is not intimately connected and consistent with the perfection of His nature.  (COT – p. 23, 24) 

“MIGHTY” 

But both the carnal and the spiritual should be spurred on, especially by two considerations which are contained in this concluding clause, and are highly calculated to enforce obedience to the divine law. 

The one is that God is called the strong.  That appellation needs to be fully expounded; because the flesh, unappalled by the terrors of the divine menaces, frequently indulges in the foolish expectation of escaping, in one way or another, God’s wrath and threatened punishment.  But when one is deeply impressed with the conviction that God is the strong, he will exclaim with the great David: Whither shall I go from thy spirit? or whither shall I flee from thy face? (Psalm 138: 7) 

The flesh, also, distrusting the promises of God, sometimes magnifies the power of the enemy to such an extent, as to believe itself unable to withstand his assaults; while, on the contrary, a firm and unshaken faith, which wavers not, but relies confidently on the strength and power of God, animates and confirms man.  For it says: The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? (Psalm 26: 1) (COT – p. 378) 

Our Lord Himself says “Be perfect as your heavenly Father is perfect”.  This leads us to the following consideration of the commandments: 

The Ten Commandments of God come to us by Revelation through Tradition.  They were given to the Jewish people through Moses, and were confirmed by Christ in the New Dispensation, which is the Law of Reality, whereas the Old Law was the law of the shadow of things to come (Colossians 2: 17).  The ceremonial precepts of the Old Law are displaced once for all; for the Jewish Sabbath, the Christian Church has substituted Sunday as the Lord’s day, in memory of Christ’s Resurrection. 

The Commandments summarize in explicit terms man’s duties according to Natural law.  The first three precepts refer to the external worship of God, the last seven refer to authority in the family, the sacredness of life and good report, the sanctity of marriage and the rights of property respectively.  

Since these precepts are imposed by God, their observance is prima facie a matter of serious obligation.  If they are violated in trivial matters—where from the nature of the case that is possible, as in the precept against theft—such violation is not a grave sin.  It is the task of Moral Theology to try to distinguish between what is objectively serious and what is not, for there is an objective order to be maintained; subjectivism in morality leads to nothing but agnosticism or moral anarchy. [This is nowhere so clearly patent as in the reaction from all objective morality that followed upon Luther’s teaching.  He himself deplored it and despaired of success in countering it (cf. Grisar, Life, vol. V): “It is clear enough how much more greedy, cruel, immodest, shameless, wicked, the people now is than it was under Popery.”  cf. Maritain, Three Reformers, p. 186.)  (Moral and Pastoral Theology by H. Davis S.J., 1958) 

The following is from the (COT) on the observance of the commandments: 

But since by this we know that we have known him, if we keep his commandments (1 John 2: 2 – 3), the next consideration, and one intimately connected with the preceding, is to press also upon the attention of the faithful that their lives are not to be wasted in ease and indolence, but that we are to walk even as he walked (1 John 2: 6), and pursue with all earnestness, justice, godliness, faith, charity, patience, mildness (1 Timothy 6: 2); for He gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and might cleanse to himself a people acceptable, a pursuer of good works (Titus 2: 14) These things the Apostle commands pastors to speak and exhort.  

But as our Lord and Saviour has not only declared, but has also proved by His own example, that the Law and the Prophets depend on love, (Matthew 22: 40; 1 Timothy 1: 5; Romans 13: 10) and as, according to the Apostle, charity is the end of the commandant, and the fulfilment of the law, (1 Timothy 1: 5; Romans 13: 10) it is unquestionably a chief duty of the pastor to use the utmost diligence to excite the faithful to a love of the infinite goodness of God towards us, that, burning with a sort of divine ardor, they may be powerfully attracted to the supreme and all-perfect good, to adhere to which is true and solid happiness, as is fully experienced by him who can say with the Prophet: What have I in heaven? and besides thee what do I desire upon earth? (Psalm 72: 25) 

This, assuredly, is that more excellent way (1 Corinthians 12: 31) pointed out by the Apostle when he sums up all his doctrines and instructions in charity, which never falleth away. (1 Corinthians 13: 8) For whatever is proposed by the pastor, whether it be the exercise of faith, of hope, or of some moral virtue, the love of our Lord should at the same time be so strongly insisted upon as to show clearly that all the works of perfect Christian virtue can have no other origin, no other end than divine love. (1 Corinthians 16: 14) (COT – p. 6 – 7) 

THE DECALOGUE 

IMPORTANCE OF INSTRUCTION ON THE COMMANDMENTS 

Saint Augustine in his writings remarks that the Decalogue is the summary and epitome of all laws: Although the Lord had spoken many things, He gave to Moses only two stone tablets, called “tables of testimony,” to be placed in the Ark.  For if carefully examined and well understood, whatever else is commanded by God will be found to depend on the Ten Commandments which were engraved on those two tables, just as these Ten Commandments, in turn, are reducible to two, the love of God and of our neighbour, on which “depend the whole law and the prophets.” (Matthew 22: 40) 

Since, then, the Decalogue is a summary of the whole Law, the pastor should give his days and nights to its consideration, that he may be able not only to regulate his own life by its precepts, but also to instruct in the law of God the people committed to his care.  The lips of the priest shall keep knowledge, of the Lord of hosts. (Malachias 2: 7) To the priests of the New Law this injunction applies in a special manner; they are nearer to God and should be transformed from glory to glory, as by the Spirit of the Lord. (2 Corinthians 3: 18) Since Christ our Lord has called them light, (Matthew 5: 14) it is their special duty to be a light to them that are in darkness, the instructors of the foolish, the teachers of infants; (Romans 2: 19, 20) and if a man be overtaken in any fault, they who are spiritual should instruct such a one. (Galatians 6: 1) 

In the tribunal of penance the priest holds the place of a judge, and pronounces sentence according to the nature and gravity of the offence.  Unless, therefore, he is desirous that his ignorance should prove an injury to himself and to others he must bring with him to the discharge of this duty the greatest vigilance and the most practiced acquaintance with the interpretation of the law, in order to be able to pronounce, according to this divine rule, on every act and omission; and, as the Apostle says, to teach sound doctrine, (2 Timothy 4: 3) free from error, and heal the diseases of the soul, which are sins, in order that the people may be acceptable to God, pursuers of good works. (Galatians 3: 19) (COT – p. 357, 8) 

GOD IS CALLED FATHER BCAUSE HE CREATED US 

Thus having created man to His own image—a favor He accorded to no other living creature—it is with good reason that, in view of this unique privilege with which He has honored man, Sacred Scripture calls God the Father of all men; not only of the faithful, but also of the unbelieving. (COT – p. 502) 

MAN’S PRONENESS TO ACT AGAINST GOD’S WILL 

From the beginning God implanted in all creatures an inborn desire of pursuing their own happiness that, by a sort of natural impulse, they may seek and desire their own end, from which they never deviate, unless impeded by some external obstacle.  This impulse of seeking God, the author and father of his happiness, was in the beginning all the more noble and exalted in man because of the fact that he was endowed with reason and judgment.  But, while irrational creatures, which, at their creation were by nature good, continued, and still continue in that original state and condition, unhappy man went astray, and lost not only original justice, with which he had been supernaturally gifted and adorned by God, but also obscured that singular inclination toward virtue which had been implanted in his soul.  All, He says, have gone aside, they are become unprofitable together; there is none that doth good, no, not one. (Psalm 52: 4) For the imagination and thought of man’s heart are prone to evil from his youth. (Genesis 8: 21) Hence it is not difficult to perceive that of himself no man is wise unto salvation; that all are prone to evil; and that man has innumerable corrupt propensities, since he tends downwards and is carried with ardent precipitancy to anger, hatred, pride, ambition, and to almost every species of evil. (COT – p. 529 - 30) 

“And lead us not into temptation” 

IMPORTANCE OF INSTRUCTION ON THIS PETITION 

When the children of God, having obtained the pardon of their sins, are inflamed with the desire of giving to God worship and veneration; when they long for the kingdom of heaven; when they engage in the performance of all the duties of piety towards the Deity, relying entirely on His paternal will and providence, — then it is that the enemy of mankind employs the more actively all his artifices, and prepares all his resources to attack them so violently as to justify the fear that, wavering and altered in their sentiments, they may relapse into sin, and thus become far worse than they had been before.  To such as these may justly be applied the saying of the Prince of the Apostles: It had been better for them not to have known the way of justice, than, after they have known it, to turn back from that holy commandment which was delivered to them. (2 Peter 2: 21)  

Hence Christ the Lord has commanded us to offer this petition so that we may commend ourselves daily to God, and implore His paternal care and assistance, being assured that, if we be deserted by the divine protection, we shall soon fall into the snares of our most crafty enemy. 

Nor is it in the Lord’s Prayer alone that He has commanded us to beg of God not to suffer us to be led into temptation.  In His address to the holy Apostles also, on the very eve of His death, after He had declared them clean, He admonished them of this duty in these words: Pray that ye enter not into temptation. (John 13: 10; Matthew 26: 41) 

This admonition, reiterated by Christ the Lord, imposes on the pastor the weighty obligation of exciting the faithful to a frequent use of this prayer, so that, beset as men constantly are by the great dangers which the devil prepares, they may ever address to God, who alone can repel those dangers, the prayer, Lead us not into temptation. (COT – p. 565-6) 

Conclusion
Our Lord is recorded twice in Holy Writ to have said “He that shall persevere unto the end, he shall be saved.”  [Mt. 10: 22 & 24: 13] Let us pray to our dear sweet Mother Mary to implore the Almighty God to please help us keep the commandments and thus to persevere in the state of sanctifying grace unto the end as His faithful and loving disciples! 

80 comments:

  1. Great article John.It's always a pleasure to read your writing.

    May I ask all readers to pray for Father Reid Hennick.An American priest who has just left the SSPX.He has come to the logical position of sedevacantism.He said it took him some time but he knew in his conscience he could no longer stay in the Society.He is young and was ordained back in 2016.I am sure he will align himself with one of the sedevacantist bishops.

    I pray more like him will also see the errors and straight out dangerous,foolish and nonsensical lies of the SSPX.

    I think the SSPX attitude towards the recent death of Bishop Williamson was shocking.Not a word in any of their parish bulletins to pray for his soul.The only thing was a brief notice from Father Schmidberger which was rude and totally classless.Shame on him.

    I think Bishop Williamson was the only decent bishop in the society.How Bishop Fellay could try and mislead souls is beyond words.

    God bless you

    TradSedeCath,NZ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is this the notice in question:
      https://fsspx.news/en/news/communique-general-house-50222

      It's brief, yes, but I can't see anything rude about it.

      The SSPX led by Bp. Fellay and the SSPX-Resistance of Bp. Williamson are both part of the problem although they see themselves as THE solution to the crisis brought about by Vatican II. They both remain tied to the Novus Ordo religion.

      God Bless!

      Delete
    2. Thank you for your views.

      The notice from the general house of the SSPX was misleading and dishonest.

      I agree that Bp Fellay and the SSPX - Resistance of Bp Williamson are both of the same problem.When I say he was decent,he did much good exposing the evil of today along with the satanic rock music,etc.When did you ever hear Bp Fellay talking on subjects like that.

      God bless

      TradSedeCath

      Delete
    3. TradSedeCath,
      Prayers for Father Reid Hennick!! A brave and humble man to be able to see the truth by God's grace, and then follow it no matter the cost!

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    4. Yes and I am sure he will be blessed with his future work of saving souls.

      God bless you Introibo

      TradSedeCath

      Delete
  2. Solution to Fermi paradox

    God did not make extraterrestrial life. All aliens are demons

    Nuff said

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon10:24
      That may be the case. (I believe you are correct). However, **IF** intelligent extraterrestrial life was found, it would not "disprove" Catholicism or religion in general as some atheists think. See my post:

      https://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2022/10/a-waste-of-space-are-humans-alone-in.html

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. finding extraterrestrial life doesnt rule out that extraterrestrial life being demons anyway

      Delete
    3. @anon9:49
      My hypothetical assumes they are not demonic but real. It has no impact on the faith, even if that were true!

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  3. Thoughts in the possibility that the sixth age of the church (the period of consolation) already happened, it lasted from the Lateran treaty to the death of H.H. Pius XII on October 9. 1958

    Franco was the great catholic monarch (the last name especially hints at it considering the great catholic monarch is prophesied to be from France, maybe it meant something else, like the lst name being Franco???.)

    Pius XII was the angelic pontiff (this is further given credit to by the st malachy prophecy)

    Of course none of this actually matters, but it is still interesting and how else can one explain the church at philedelphia? 🤔

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Franco was a true hero, but I doubt he has anything to do with that prophecy. Secondly things took a turn for the worst when his best advisor and general was assassinated. Opus Dei began to infiltrate his government and soon after he died, the king of Spain (who was a mason) held the country up for elections. Franco did what he could, but he was fighting a losing battle. I know many priests who speak highly of him, mostly priests of Hispanic and Latino descent. But I think saw Fr. Jenkins speak good of him in a What Catholics Believe video awhile back.

      Jeremy Van Auker

      Delete
    2. Jeremy,
      I agree with you. As my regular readers (like you) know, I don't pay heed to private revelations! We have to understand what must be believed especially in this Great Apostasy.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    3. as i said

      "Of course none of this actually matters"

      Delete
    4. @anon2:04
      I realize that, my friend! Just emphasizing a point.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  4. Thank you very much TradSede. That is really great news for that priest!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Introibo:

    1. Why do you think some traditional Catholics are STILL Hitler fanboys?

    2. What do you think of Bishop Williamson's remarks about the Holocaust?

    3. What are things that you disagree with Bishop Williamson on?

    4. Do you think that the Nazis murdered Father Maximilian Kolbe? Some people have been saying online that they think that Kolbe died in a hospital.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My opinion:

      1: They are either too angry with the Jews to understand the gods of Hitler are weak, or cope themselves into thinking he was a Christian (he wasn't)

      2: I don't care. I still believe in (most) of what is said about the Holocaust, but if anyone wants to deny it happened, that's just too bad. Right now, the Shoah is used almost exclusively for cheap propaganda, and the state of Israel uses it to defend their unspeakable evil against the Palestinian people and others. Plus, the European states give you money if you claim to be a survivor, something which has quickly evolved out of proportion.

      3:
      A) His lefebvrism. The heretical leader of an apostate religion is no pope. Recognize and resist goes against the doctrine of church unity and papal dogmas.

      B) His approval of Maria Valtorta. Her alleged revelations are very suspicious and borderline deviant.

      4: I won't believe Fr. Kolbe died in a hospital until I see the evidence, but it is not something I care about.

      Delete
    2. Ad 4:
      Is the manner of Fr. Kolbe's death something that Holocaust skeptics doubt? Sheesh!

      Fr. Kolbe was murdered by German Nazis by having administered a lethal injection into his arm after he had been starved for two weeks alongside nine other prisoners. The guards wanted that bunker empty at last and so Fr. Kolbe was put to death with an injection of carbolic acid.

      https://web.archive.org/web/20121007002629/http://www.ewtn.com/library/MARY/kolbe2.htm

      "Bruno Borgowiec [a fellow prisoner at Auschwitz] was an eye-witness of those last terrible days, for he was an assistant to the janitor and an interpreter in the underground Bunkers. He tells us what happened: 'In the cell of the poor wretches there were daily loud prayers, the rosary and singing, in which prisoners from neighbouring cells also joined. When no S. S. men were in the Block I went to the Bunker to talk to the men and comfort them. Fervent prayers and songs to the Holy Mother resounded in all the corridors of the Bunker. I had the impression I was in a church. Fr Kolbe was leading and the prisoners responded in unison. They were often so deep in prayer that they did not even hear that inspecting S. S. men had descended to the Bunker; and the voices fell silent only at the loud yelling of their visitors. When the cells were opened the poor wretches cried loudly and begged for a piece of bread and for water, which they did not receive, however. If any of the stronger ones approached the door he was immediately kicked in the stomach by the S. S. men, so that falling backwards on the cement floor he was instantly killed; or he was shot to death ... Fr Kolbe bore up bravely, he did not beg and did not complain but raised the spirits of the others.... Since they had grown very weak, prayers were now only whispered. At every inspection, when almost all the others were now lying on the floor, Fr Kolbe was seen kneeling or standing in the centre as he looked cheerfully in the face of the S. S. men. Two weeks passed in this way. Meanwhile one after another they died, until only Fr Kolbe was left. This the authorities felt was too long; the cell was needed for new victims. So one day they brought in the head of the sick-quarters, a German, a common criminal named Bock, who gave Fr Kolbe an injection of carbolic acid in the vein of his left arm. Fr Kolbe, with a prayer on his lips, himself gave his arm to the executioner. Unable to watch this I left under the pretext of work to be done. Immediately after the S. S. men with the executioner had left I returned to the cell, where I found Fr Kolbe leaning in a sitting position against the back wall with his eyes open and his head drooping sideways. His face was calm and radiant.'"

      Delete
    3. 1. They ignore the mountain of evidence which shows he wasn’t just another Franco or Salazar such as how his cabinet were all pagans or how the communists admitted he was a stooge or how he contributed to the creation of the antichrist state, or mit brennender Sorge and how his Darwinianism was not the “il vero il proprio il sano razzismo” spoken of by Pius XI. How he was a Zionist. How the Jews regard him as “messiah Ben Joseph” (they said they would set up another haman figure) (messiah Ben Joseph is the predecessor to the “messiah” of the Jews (Antichrist), he paves the way by creating Israel, he persecutes Jews. This is found in the Talmud, the Jews regard him as such) They ignore all these facts because they have been blinded to the truth

      2. Let me make it very clear that one can deny the holocaust and be anti Hitler

      3. Introibos a and b also his support of garabandal and his support of fourth political theory and his theory of mentevacantism (the antipopes are too stupid to be heretics, as if that would disqualify them from being popes)

      4. If it is proven he died in a hospital then he died in a hospital, if it is proven that he was killed by the Nazis then he was killed by the Nazis.

      But he certainly wasn’t killed in a “gas” (deslousing) chamber!

      Delete
    4. My opinion on Hitler Fanboys:
      1. I agree with Poni above.

      2. I believe Hitler tried to exterminate the Jews but the number may be less than six million.

      3. His R&R nonsense, support of Garabandal and Valtorta. He also looked down on women. I met Williamson in the mid-1980s when he was still a priest. He was strange and rude, but I acknowledge the good he did and pray for the repose of his soul.

      4. I agree with Joanna completely.

      Hitler Fanboys who dare call themselves Traditionalists do a disservice to the Church, making us look like reactionary weirdos, when we are already receiving enough negative publicity for "denying Francis is the pope."

      I also refuse to make this blog about personal agendas. Whether or not exactly six million Jews were killed, how they were killed, etc. has NOTHING to do with the Catholic Faith. It's like belief in Bigfoot. I don't think it exists, but if you do that's fine. You will not be damned to Hell for believing or disbelieving Bigfoot.

      There are those Hitler Fanboys who actually espouse heresy when some claim "it is impossible for a Jew to sincerely convert to Catholicism." God wills the salvation of all, although all are not saved. There is NO CHURCH TEACHING that "Jews cannot convert and be saved." That statement is heretical as it is a denial of the salvific Will of God.

      If anyone wants to push these ideas it won't be here. I am concerned with the preservation and propagation of the One True Faith whole and entire. Period.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    5. Did Father Kolbe offer to exchange his life for a Jew with a large family?

      Delete
    6. John Gregory,
      that fellow prisoner was Polish and Catholic, indeed a husband and father.

      "In the last days of July that year [1941], following a prisoner's escape, the camp supervisor sentenced 10 inmates from the same unit to death by starvation in retaliation. Franciszek Gajowniczek, one of the accused, implored for mercy on behalf of his spouse and offspring. Hearing these words, Father Kolbe stepped out of line [as the prisoners had been summoned at the roll-call square] and approached the SS men with a proposal to take the place of the distraught prisoner. Karl Fritzsch, who carried out the selection, agreed, and Father Kolbe joined the other prisoners who were escorted to the cellar of Block 11."

      Source: https://www.auschwitz.org/en/museum/news/82nd-anniversary-of-the-death-of-father-maximilian-kolbe,1636.html

      God Bless,
      Joanna

      Delete
    7. Joanna S.,

      Thank you for sharing that. I have always wondered if I was in a situation like Fr. Kolbe, could I have been that heroic? Somehow I do not think so. It would take a lot of grace to have been able to persevere like he did. He was truly a heroic man! Living in a situation like Fr. Kolbe and those prisoners did was truly hell on Earth. It always makes me grateful and thankful to reflect on the fact that while we all have our crosses and hardships, there is always someone who has it worse than us.

      Thank you for sharing.

      -TradWarrior

      Delete
    8. Thanks so much Joanna,

      John Gregory

      Delete
    9. TradWarrior,
      you're so right!
      It's hard to imagine that only eighty years ago there were hellish places in civilized Europe like Auschwitz, Ravensbruck, Gross-Rosen, or Dachau where you could get deported to if you were deemed dangerous or expendable by Nazi Germany.
      Pius XI had warned the German nation against the godless ideology of national socialism but his fatherly rebuke was unheeded.

      John Gregory,
      you're very welcome!

      God Bless You both,
      Joanna

      Delete
    10. there is a word for distasteful neo nazis - "wignats"

      Delete
  6. Hello John and Introibo
    The above comment about the SSPX.When our family was attending their Masses,we would never get any straight answers when asking their priests.They would give out a book reading list and only those were to be read.The last straw was the 2012 disaster with bp Fellay.Also the sham rosary crusades .
    God bless you,Paul and Jane

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Paul and Jane,
      How sad. The SSPX sound more whacky all the time. That's the result of the mental gymnastics you must perform to preserve the false papacy of Bergoglio at all costs.

      God Bless you both,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. The Society don't pray the Mysteries of Light Chaplet do they? Surely not.

      Delete
    3. Everything I hear second hand about the SSPX is negative. But what I would like to say is if they are the only option for Penance, Eucharist and Extreme Unction for one in an old person home that they could be very beneficial. It would be good to make sure the Priest is valid though.

      Delete
  7. And hospitals were killing fields, then and now. Nothing new under the sun.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous Feb 18th 11.22AM

    Regarding the writing of Father Schmidberger about the recent death of Bp Williamson.It is on the Cathinfo website.Click on SSPX Resistance news and scroll down.Father Chazal made a response which is also listed there.

    Have you watched the excellent youtube interview with Bp Pierre Roy also once of the SSPX?He has many missions in Canada

    God bless you

    TradSedeCath

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bishop Roy is a very good man, much of his work in Canada is quite impressive. May God guide and watch over his Apostolate.

      Jeremy Van Auker

      Delete
  9. Compare the First Commandment to the First Amendment. The First Commandment states “I am the Lord your God, you shall not have other gods beside me.” The First Amendment’s Establishment Clause prevents the government from making laws that favor one religion over another. The First Commandment establishes that we worship the one, true God, The Blessed Trinity, God – Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. The First Amendment, created by freemasons, calls for a strict separation of Church and State, not allowing one religion to be favored over another.

    The teaching of the Catholic Church has always been that the State is subject to the Church and the State must be Catholic. It must reflect the ideals and values of the one, true religion. Religious pluralism has always been condemned. This has been demonstrated, but is not limited to, the following papal writings: Pope Gregory XVI “Mirari Vos”, Pope Pius IX “Quanta Cura” and “The Syllabus of Errors”, Pope Leo XIII “Immortale Dei” and “Libertas Praestantissimum”, Pope St. Pius X “Vehementer Nos”, and Pope Pius XI “Quas Primas”.

    The freemasonic principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity were championed at Vatican II under the religious principles of religious liberty, collegiality, and ecumenism. They were enunciated very clearly in “Dignitatis Humanae” and “Gaudium et Spes” (as well as throughout the other documents). The V2 “popes” championed these principles in their numerous subsequent writings as well.

    We have a choice – we either follow the one, true God under the First Commandment or we follow the freemasonic separation of Church and State. One leads to heaven; the other leads to hell.

    Many Novus Ordo’s have been upset in recent years (and rightfully so) when there have been religious buildings built in certain areas around where they live. But these other houses of worship have a RIGHT to exist according to their own V2 sect, something that they do not realize. If we reject the pre-conciliar teachings before Vatican II and fully believe these V2 “popes” were pope and this council was a true ecumenical council, then their teachings are binding both via the Universal Extraordinary Magisterium and the Universal Ordinary Magisterium. Do not complain therefore when a synagogue or mosque goes up near where you live. Your own “Catholic” religion has christened these freemasonic principles in their own official teachings. Eastern Orthodoxy, Protestantism, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Shintoism, Taoism, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormonism, etc. – are all fair game here. There should be no more protest over the synagogue any more than over the mosque. Even the Satanic Temples which have been going up very rapidly everywhere should not be protested against by Novus Ordo’s because, strictly speaking, even they have a RIGHT to be there under the First Amendment PLUS the teachings of Vatican II and the V2 “popes” in their official teachings that say ALL religious have a right to exist in the State. Reject the perennial teachings of the Catholic Church and its true popes throughout the ages and this is the end result. Every religion must be supported equally. Pope Gregory XVI called religious liberty “insanity” and rightfully so. But a world that has rejected the one, true God and His teachings for insane principles deserves to live in the insane repercussions that have followed, since sanity was thrown out a long time ago.

    -TradWarrior

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Has anyone read the Redemption Manual? Many seem to see that the Church and Her buildings were hijacked but no one seems to see that our country was hijacked even before V2 and even founded by freemasons. So much is a huge scam, criminal. Most countries including ours is lockstep with the Vatican marching towards One World Order/Govt/Religion. There are many other sources which will confirm this too, so feel free to look into it.
      https://archive.org/details/redemption-manual-4-5-edition/page/114/mode/1up

      I like page 114 entitled Forbidden History. This manual of course gets much wrong about religion but so does the majority of the whole world.

      Delete
  10. Thanks for the awesome post!

    John Gregory

    ReplyDelete
  11. John Gregory,

    Thank you for interesting post. I found it beneficial.

    “I believe the real reason they [atheists] chose not to believe stems from fear. They know the lifestyle they live would be at odds with God if He exists and that they will be damned to Hell if He exists.” This reminds me of the St. Augustine quote: “He who denies the existence of God, has some reason for wishing that God did not exist.”

    “We never can rest on our laurels or we will drift away, we must continually strive for holiness. Never getting too down when we fall, nor prideful when we are doing well.”

    And from the COT, “…attention of the faithful that their lives are not to be wasted in ease and indolence, but that we are to walk even as he walked…”

    Great reminders!

    You’ve tied all this in with “Be perfect as your heavenly Father is perfect” and with the COT’s urgings that we need to rely on God’s help. I don’t know when it was, but whenever I started really thinking about this quote, I’m sure my initial reaction was one of incredulity – me, be perfect? But, I’ve come to learn what Jesus means, (well, at least I think I have). Love God, and thus serve Him, by striving to be perfect while petitioning His help and cooperating with His numberless graces.

    I also found benefit in the reminders at the end about our nature being prone to evil and asking God to “lead us not into temptation”, which led me to think about how in the Mass it is said that God established the nature of man in wondrous dignity, and still more admirably restored it.

    Thanks again, and God Bless,
    -S.T.

    P.S. I had trouble locating the COT references, e.g. COT – p. 357, 8. Please advise, thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thank you very much Seeking Truth!

    Regarding the quote, I probably messed it up. I will double check. Sorry about that.

    God bless you,
    John Gregory

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. John Gregory,

      The quotes may very well be fine, but I am having trouble finding the sections and page numbers. Were they from a specific book containing the COT, like "The canons and decrees of the sacred and ecumenical Council of Trent", 1848? Thank you.
      -S.T.

      Delete
    2. I doubled checked the information is from pages 357- 358 in the Catechism of Trent.

      Delete
    3. Thank you John - could you share the info of the book you are using? As I suspected, it seems to be a pagination issue with the book I am using. Thank you.
      -S.T.

      Delete
    4. Sorry for the delay S.T. It is Tan books with Imprimatur given in 1923. Copyright 1976 and 1982. Not sure if that helps. I would love to have a hard copy of the book. The pages are all falling out.

      Delete
    5. Thanks, John! I think that will help get me started and in the right ballpark for the references. I was searching in the index and couldn't find them.
      -S.T.

      Delete
  13. do you think that Bergoglio's successor may be THE false prophet?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Could be. But that is one of those things we won't know until we know. You know?
    😀

    John Gregory

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He may not have one:

      https://nonvenipacem.org/2025/02/17/how-did-some-rando-anon-know-with-certainty-on-17-feb-2013-that-the-next-pope-would-be-argentinian/

      Delete
  15. Fyi...the Kolbe NO center promotes dinosaurs...

    Kolbe Center for the Study of Creation
    https://www.kolbecenter.org
    PDF
    Historical Evidence for Dinosaur and Human Co-existence
    by B now Behemoth — proponents and skeptics of the dinosaur interpretation alike; Vance Nelson has extensively debunked ... dinosaurs-in-greco-roman-art. (18) http://www.ncbi ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon6:28
      Yes, they are whacky to say the least, and despite contentions to the contrary, Fr. Kolbe held no such views.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. Please excuse my ignorance, but what precisely is the authentic Church position on dinosaurs and, further, carnivorous animal life before the Fall?

      Delete
    3. Great question. I have been trying to figure that out and see so much conflicting info.. I saw what I thought might be a good answer here but am always weary bc they are R&R and I was shocked by one of the articles. If anyone knows, advise please. Most claim dinosaurs lived millions of years ago, before humans and that does not correspond with Genesis or Roman Martyrology. The earth is not millions of years old. I am tired of all the lies.
      https://www.traditioninaction.org/Questions/B314_Evolution.html

      Delete
    4. @anon4:56 and @anon8:20
      Here is a post I wrote regarding the topic of origins; if you have any questions after reading it, please ask.

      https://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2024/01/human-origin.html

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    5. Thank you Introibo, that is instructive.

      This link shows a Peter Robinson interview with 3 mathematicians (one of whom was a victim of the Una Bomber) who categorically disprove the notion of Evolution. It's mathematically impossible, to the point of being ludicrous:

      https://youtu.be/noj4phMT9OE?si=Vl-ixRDO4LV8ESE6

      Delete
  16. @anon4:56pm and @anon8:20pm,

    Allow me to offer some insight. This is from notes I compiled a few years ago. I have MUCH more information than just this too.

    Evidence for a Young Earth/Universe:

    Dating methods don’t work. Carbon dating is used. C14 is within all living things. C14 is released when living things die. C14 has a half-life of 5,730 years. DNA has a half-life of 521 years. Keeps getting cut in half. Developed in 1949. The founder even admitted carbon dating can’t be used for anything over 50,000 years. A fresh seal skin was shown to be 1,300 years old, though it was still living. 750 year difference in the outside and inside of a mastodon living 7,820 years ago. Dating bones – geologic chart is most common way used. Different periods of time are used. Geological column doesn’t exist in the Earth in real life like it does in books. Use the chart to date the bones, not date it themselves. Willard Libby (the founder of carbon dating) admitted carbon dating doesn’t work >50,000 years ago. Mudslides from Noah’s Ark would have had multiple layers of rock, which is what we find. Send press release saying this bone was “X” amount of time old. All they use is a chart. No dating of bones. Determine the age of the rock by the fossils found in them. It’s all circular reasoning. Rocks are based on the fossils in them and the age of the fossils are determined in the age of the rocks they are found in. A few rocks can be radiometric dated. Carbon dating is only for living things. Igneous rock (lava) can be radiometrically dated. Potassium decays into Argon in the rock. They measure the rate of decay from Potassium into Argon. Cannot assume a constant rate of decay. Mt. St. Helens erupted in 1980. In the 1990’s, creation scientists took 5 samples to be tested. Potassium Argo dated it-1) 340,000 2) 350,000 3) 900,000 4) 1.7 million 5) 2.8 million. These rocks were less than 30 years old (<30 years old). Another study used 11 samples. Same huge span. 1801 volcano erupted in Hawaii. Rock was 200 years old. 12 samples were taken. Dated millions to billions of years old. 1.41 billion years old was one result. No known rock has been correctly dated using radiometric dating. Why trust the age of an unknown rock when 100% of the time, the age of a known rock has never matched the radiometric age? Coal and oil do not take millions of years to form. They are the result of Noah’s flood. Volcanic ash fell on log marsh- coal and oil were formed quickly in a short amount of time. Coal can be formed in 36 weeks in controlled laboratories. > Temperature, coal forms faster. Oil continues to develop every day. Wall Street Journal in 1999 reported oil continued to grow, even as it was trapped.

    Polonium halos in granite. Studies have showed the Earth was created quickly. 0.000164 seconds is the half-life of this granite. This contradicts the evolutionists theory granite needed millions/billions of years to form. These halos would disappear very quickly.

    ReplyDelete
  17. CONTINUED…The Mountains. After the Flood, the mountains were raised up. If true, invertebrates at the bottom of the sea should be at the tops of mountains. At the tops and sides of mountains are clams, jellyfish, oysters, and other invertebrates. Mountains erode over time. After 14 million years, all mountains would erode. Yet, they are still here – points to a young Earth.

    The Water. Mississippi River dumps mud into The Gulf of Mexico. 4,500 years of mud has been dumped into the Mississippi River – just like the Flood. No river has dumped mud > 4,500 years. Mud in oceans would be choked with mud if billions of years old, dozens of miles thick. We don’t see that. Mud in oceans corresponds to mud deposit <5,000 years. Volcanic water is another factor. 20% of erupted volcanos can be this water. 340 billion years ago, the Earth would have been dry, but we know that’s not true. Oldest tree is about 4,300 years old – Bristle Cone Pine Tree. Why nothing older? 4,500 hundred years of erosion in Niagara Falls. Coincidence?

    Human history doesn’t support long ages. 1) Not enough Stone Age skeletons. 4 billion Stone Age skeletons should be around. We only find a few thousand. 2) Agriculture reason. Stone Age men show they were just as intelligent as we are. 3) History is too short. Why wait several years before recording history? Dr. Henry Morris did a population study. Exponential curve. He factored in death and disease. He went back 4,500 years ago and started with 8 people in Noah’s Ark. Population today equated to over 6 billion people. Supports the biblical evidence. He went back 41,000 years as evolutionists say and it hit an exponential curve. 2 X 1089 was the known growth rate according to the evolutionist’s numbers. Where are all the other bodies on Earth? 1:1 ratio of birth and death rate is illogical over billions of years. A decrease in humans would die off over a long period of time. An increase and we would hit an exponential curve. Clearly, we haven’t been around millions and billions of years, but just a few thousand years.

    -TradWarrior

    ReplyDelete
  18. @anon4:56pm and @anon8:20pm,

    Here is evidence that dinosaurs lived with man. Again, I have many more notes in addition to what I am sharing here. This is just a sampling.

    Dinosaurs on Noah’s Ark? Most dinosaurs were not that big. Most were 3-5 feet in length. They could have been sent on the ark as babies. Reptiles never stop growing. Lifespans shortened after The Flood. Dinosaurs could have lived a few hundred years.

    Dinosaurs were not discovered until 1841. They have been depicted by man. Richard Owen coined the term. “Terrible Lizard” is what dinosaur means. Before 1841, they were called dragons. Humans describing dinosaurs shows evolution is faulty due to eyewitness accounts.

    Dragon legends throughout history. British, Scottish, Chinese, etc. have dragon legends. How could all these cultures invent the same creature? It’s like everyone having the same dream. Chinese Zodiac has 12 animals. 11 are real. Why not #12?

    Historical accounts of actual dragon sightings. 450BC Herodicus spoke of “winged serpents”. He saw them in Arabia he said. Daniel chapter 14 – Daniel killed the dragon – Catholic Bible. Gilgamesh, a Sumerian, slew a dragon. Scandinavian story – dragon slayed. Alexander the Great in 300BC said his soldiers saw dragons. 1271 Marco Polo saw dragons. Vikings had dragon heads on their ships.

    Dragons in the Bible. There are over 20 times references to dragons. Deuteronomy 32:33, Job 30:29, Psalms 44:19, 74:13, 148:7, 91:13, Isaiah 13:22, 34:13, 35:7, 43:20, 27:1, 51:9, Jeremiah 9:11, 10:22, 14:6, 49:33, 51:34, 51:37, Micah 1:8, Malachi 1:3, Nehemiah 2:13.

    ReplyDelete
  19. CONTINUED…Historical artifacts. There are exact replicas of dinosaurs. Ica, Peru – carving of dinosaurs. Triceratops and T-Rex depicted. Cambodia- carvings in temples of dinosaurs (Stegosaurus)-1,000 years ago. Bernifal Cave in France depiction. San Rafael-flying dinosaur depiction. 600BC Babylonian picture of dinosaurs. Lions and bulls depicted with them. Sumatrans-long-necked dinosaurs. Budapest, Boston, Greece. Greek race of Heracles and a “monster”. 550BC urn in Korea depiction. 530BC shows a dinosaur, seal, octopus, and a dolphin. Mesopotamia-Apatosaurus. King Tut’s tomb-“winged snakes.” 200AD Roman mosaic-2 dragons with long necks. Africans in Ethiopia hunting a dinosaur. Mayan “reptile/bird” 1,000-4,000 years ago. Arizona rock carving in the shape of a dinosaur. South Africa-sauropod dinosaur. Egyptian seal-dinosaur hunting a gazelle. 1300-11:50BC French image. 1793-Scottish saw dragons and wrote a book about it. 1691-dragon in Rome. Zimbabwe cave paintings of Brontosaurus. They only painted real creatures. 1924 artifacts in Tucson, Arizona showed a dinosaur on a sword. 1945 clay figurines in Mexico showed dinosaurs in BC times in 800BC-200AD. Mexican government examined this and it was proven to be legitimate. Saxon shield with a Pterosaur on it in 400-700AD. Carlisle Cathedral in the UK shows dinosaurs battling each other. Lots of evidence they lived with man.

    Actual cave drawings on the dinosaurs. Aborigines drew dinosaurs on cave walls. Indian cave drawings in Grand Canyon-duck billed dinosaurs. Pterosaur in the U.S. southwest. North American Native Americans drew them. South Africa pseudopods/pterosaurs. Zimbabwe-Brachiosaurus.

    Dinosaur bones that are fresh and unfossilized. Log with ax, bowlers hat, 12 sausage links, a ham, a dog, derby hat, foot in a cowboy boot, etc. all fossilized in just a few hundred years, not millions of years. Unfossilized bones couldn’t exist 65 million years ago. Northwestern Alaska-unfossilized bones of dinosaurs found. Montana too. T-Rex bone found with soft tissue and blood vessels. Mary Schweitzer said the contents could be freshly squeezed out-they were so fresh. There could still be a handful of dinosaurs around today. We don’t know. 2003 AP story in Vermont. A woman reported seeing a “monster”. She saw it in a lake. Another person saw the creature too. 1847-a sea serpent was seen in a lake. Who knows what else is out there???

    As I mentioned, I have other notes on these topics and many other interesting topics that fall in this same sphere, but I will leave it here for now.

    -TradWarrior

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I liked your comment but I have an objection to the art argument. Many of the dragons pictured have little to none resemblance to the remains that have been found. Plus, different cultures can invent similar creatures without them being necesarily real.

      Delete
    2. Thank you so much Trad Warrior! So interesting. Someone told me long ago that it was fully proven that Earth was young, approx 6 to 7 thousand years, but info was suppressed. I saw a meme that made me laugh showing an alligator seemingly swimming on top of water with a picture below it was walking so it fit the modern day image of dinosaur, just smaller of course as you mentioned. Did you find all this information in books? All so fascinating. I will try to research some of the names of people and topics you included. Thank you!
      Ps...a fresh seal coat was 1300 yrs old but still alive? And oil and coal formed from the Ark?? Just yesterday someone who owns an antique shop offered me a seal fur coat from Canada. He cannot sell online and wanted it to go to someone he knows instead of donating.

      Delete
    3. I lived in Orlando in the 90s. Downtown is Lake Eola. I used to walk around it at lunch. 2 or 3 times in one year I saw a massive creature in there. Part of it would surface very briefly and it seemed huge. The lake was rather small too. Very odd. No one believed me.

      Delete
  20. Thank you Introibo! I read your post re Origin. Some of it is over my head but much is very good teaching for me. I definitely don't understand this quote from Ott near end because it sounds like God may have breathed a soul into an animal?
    "Theologian Ott says similarly:
    The soul of the first man was created immediately by God out of nothing. As regards the body, its immediate formation from inorganic stuff by God cannot be maintained with certainty. Fundamentally, the possibility exists that God breathed the spiritual soul into an organic stuff, that is, into an originally animal body…"

    I also watched the video with the mathematicians, which much was over my head too. They also believe many lies but I got the jist that they all reject Darwin.

    Thank you both! I find so much about the Faith difficult to understand so it worries me I will believe something I shouldn't believe. Why didn't the Church enumerate all the dogmas in one place?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon8:58
      1. As to theologian Ott, he means that God could give a soul to something organic and not purely animal that could receive a human soul and become the First Human.

      2. There is Denzinger which lists all dogmas (more or less) but to read it apart from the theologians is to invite danger. You are never a heretic if you honestly believe something is taught by the Church when such is not the case.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. A human is a rational animal.

      Delete
    3. Thank you both very much! God bless us! St Peter Damian, pray for us!

      Delete
  21. I should mention that the notes that I posted on the Young Earth and dinosaur topics had a few slight typos/errors in them. For example, mathematical exponents did not type the way they should. The one part with the exponent typed out would read – 10 (to the 89th power). It didn’t translate correctly when I posted it on Introibo’s blog.

    I took these notes a few years ago from a series of recordings that I listened to. I was trying to write as quickly as I could. I had to stop the recordings a few times and check online for certain facts such as names and references before continuing the recording. I transcribed everything as accurately as I could from the recordings that I was listening to. They were a series of apologetic talks given by a Protestant. He did a very good job on various apologetic topics and I even offered to debate this man in a Catholic/Protestant debate (or series of debates) but I was declined. It is unfortunate because he has had debates with many different people spanning different religions (and no religion) but he wanted no part of a debate with a Catholic. I found that interesting! Almost all of his apologetic material I agreed with, minus a few things here and there. We could have had a blockbuster of a debate but he was unwilling. Perhaps he was afraid that he would have lost. We’ll never know because we never got the chance to square off and fight!

    One problem that I have run into with many traditionalists is their lack of willingness to read or listen to someone other than another traditional Catholic. I have not had this problem because I have always been a very well-balanced person. When it comes to topics on the origins of the Earth and universe, there is some very good material put out there by Protestants, some of which, you would be hard pressed to find in both traditional Catholic and Novus Ordo circles. That is unfortunate. While Protestants do not have the true faith due to sola scriptura, sola fide, and a host of other theological problems they hold to, there is nevertheless good materials on some science issues that they have put out there. I have met some traditional Catholics (not all of course) who wouldn’t dare to read anything by a non-traditional Catholic. This is unfortunate because it really confines one to a box in ones thinking. Likewise, I have known people who have said, “I only eat Italian food.” I’m like, “Really? You don’t know what you are missing. Try some Polish cuisine - Pierogi, Nalesniki. How about some Greek cuisine – Souvlaki, Moussaka, Dolmades. Japanese – Sushi. Arabic – Shawarma. You don’t know what you are missing!” Many people cannot expand their horizons, which only inhibits them from expanding their knowledge because of an unnecessary fear that holds them back.

    There are many interesting topics as it relates to faith and science. I think that 3 of the biggest errors among modern scientists today are the beliefs in 1) Old Age Earth/Universe, 2) Evolution, and 3) Heliocentrism. They have caused massive damage on many levels. There are some people who disagree and they are entitled to their opinions on these matters.

    ReplyDelete
  22. CONTINUED…The key point is that there will never be any disagreement between faith and science because both came from God. Unfortunately, Pope Pius XII is bashed by trads a lot for a host of different reasons. I think that Introibo’s post on Pius XII in defense of him was absolutely fantastic and right on the money!

    On a theological level, trads bash him for changing Holy Week, shortening the fast to 3 hours, and many other things. The world was changing and he made many great moves (in my opinion) that needed to be made. Shortening the fast to 3 hours was a common sense move; otherwise, a person could be fasting for 20 hours if all they could do was attend a Sunday evening Mass. While I am not a liturgist (or a theologian or canonist), I think that many of his liturgical changes were not only wise, but I wondered why they actually weren’t implemented much earlier. They were very wise moves. Many of course disagree and believe that they led to the Novus Ordo because the Boogeyman Bugnini was involved, but this just doesn’t hold up. The pope is protected by The Holy Ghost from giving error or evil to the church in matters of discipline and to deny this is to deny the indefectibility of the church.

    On a scientific level, trads bash Pius XII because he didn’t censor men like Fr. Georges Lemaitre who proposed long ages. While I do not adhere to everything that Fr. Lemaitre held to, such as long ages, the fact that Pius XII allowed Fr. Lemaitre to propose his theories should not make one feel threatened by the science that he was proposing. Again, faith and science will never contradict each other and Pope Pius XII takes a lot of unnecessary flack for many things unfairly. He may not have been as strong as Pius IX, Leo XIII, or St. Pius X (and that is a fair critique) but by the time he reigned, the enemies of the church had already infiltrated to the highest levels in the church and world and it’s unfair to feel like this man should have policed the church and the world (as if he could). He had the fewest cardinal electors in 100 years because he knew the infiltration had taken full effect in the church and the deluge would follow him. It also has been said that few popes were saints, diplomats, and scholars. Pius XII was all 3. The topic of faith and science has always been an interesting one and it’s one where people should not be threatened to go “where the evidence leads”. After all, isn’t that why we came to the conclusion that there has been no known pope since Pius XII died in 1958.

    -TradWarrior

    ReplyDelete
  23. Such great info Trad Warrior! Thank you! I agree we can learn much from non Trads etc. Are you a professional debater? It is so great you will debate people...some accept your challenge I presume? Even though I have discovered the NO is false and sedevacantism is the correct position I am finding it very difficult to share knowledge. Most won't listen but it is often non Catholics who will. An hvac technician was in my home and even though he studied science extensively, knew the vaxxes were bad, he believed we evolved from chimpanzees. He was baptized Catholic and said he knows about all religions and he rejects them. He did pause and said he'd go back and study more when I told him evolution was an unproven communist lie. Why aren't chimpanzees checking out of zoos? Maybe our world is the way it is because we have taught generations of children they came from animals and we can kill them if we don't have time for them. Another person I encountered knew the Vatican was evil because of the Pope endorsing the kill shots as an act of love. They are not Catholic but knew murdered babies in shots and couldn't believe the Vatican endorsement and all the pro life Catholics lining up for shots. She studied, traveled to the Holy land and the Vatican she said and has come to the conclusion the Sabbath is on Saturday and was never changed in the NT. She is learning from a book called Pagan Christianity by Frank Viola. I will try to refute some of her errors but not sure if I will make progress with either of these folks. Off the top of my head it is very difficult in real time for me to refute intelligently/coherently all these errors. It is overwhelming with random meetings and with people we know who claim to be Catholic. The chat with the hvac man became heated and I felt my chest tighten and restrict and was worried for a few minutes about my own well being. These times are very challenging, thanks for so many answers here. God bless all!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is often difficult in the moment to say the perfect argument. If you make sure you know some main points they can't refute, it hopefully will cause them to think more upon the matter. It sounds like the HVAC tech is going to study more. Debating effectively is definitely a skill. Keep praying, and God Bless.
      -S.T.

      Delete
    2. Thanks so much! God bless you!

      Delete
  24. @anon4:35pm

    Thank you for the kind words. I really appreciate them. I would not classify myself as a professional debater although I do enjoy a heated discussion and debate from time to time. I enjoy all different areas of theology and apologetics was my first love, so yes, debates were something that I got involved in very early on when I took an interest in theology many years ago. I used to get involved in very involved debates that would cover a plethora of issues. I do agree with you that the vax is bad and causing many problems. I wholeheartedly agree on that point with you. I do not engage in many debates anymore like I used to. Don’t get me wrong, I still very much enjoy a good debate, but in many cases I find that prayer, fasting, and sacrifices for souls goes much farther than argumentation. People have to be open to God’s grace and if there is an opening, then The Holy Ghost can help open minds and hearts when you speak to people about the faith; otherwise, the effort will most likely be futile. Due to the effects of sin, many people’s intellects and wills are darkened and therefore the positive results that we hope for with these people will always be lacking, sad as that reality is. My advice to you would be to pray and offer sacrifices for as many people as you can. If an opportunity presents itself through words where you can articulate various points about the faith to them, by all means, give it a try. If it doesn’t go the way you hope for, at least you tried your best. That is all any of us can do in life is to try our best. If in the end, some people make it to heaven due to your prayers and sacrifices then they will be forever grateful to you because it was in large part to your prayers that they attained salvation. Never sell your prayers short even if you feel like they are not accomplishing anything. They carry more weight with God than we know in this Earthly realm. Do not give up, nor have any belief whatsoever in how others judge you, for your greatness will silence them all.

    -TradWarrior

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Trad Warrior! Beautiful words of wisdom on this blessed Sunday!

      So grateful for this blog and all his dear readers/commenters.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous,
      couldn't agree more! I've met truly wonderful people and learnt a great deal about the True Faith and life in general ever since I started to read Introibo's blog a few years ago.

      God Bless You!

      Delete
    3. So true Joanna! I have been reading this for many years but did not make the final jump until this past summer. I knew so many things were wrong with R&R but I kept second guessing myself because all my mentors (some priests conditionally ordained) so smart and learned (or so I thought). Oh my. I kept showing them posts from here and they wouldn't even fully read and kept giving the same response (it is a theological opinion...that is wrong). Exhausting. My name is Bridget. I can't figure websites out so I just post as easy as possible. God bless you too! Always enjoy your entries too. Thank you!

      Delete
  25. Trad Warrior

    I love your writings and common sense.Thank you so much

    Are you a good book reader?Do you have a large library at home?I love reading good solid books and have well over three thousand and counting.

    God bless you

    TradSedeCath

    ReplyDelete
  26. @anon3:11pm,

    TradSedeCath,

    I do like to read books but unfortunately my schedule is pretty demanding and I am WAY behind in my reading. I do have a list books that I am still trying to get to. It is hard with my schedule. I am fortunate that I have a pretty good memory and I can retain a lot of material through the years that I have read. I wouldn’t say I have a photographic memory, but I have been able to retain a lot which has helped tremendously. Your count of books in your library is very impressive. I have nowhere near 3,000 books in my collection. It isn’t even close. I just read what I can, when I can and do the best I can. I have a decent amount of books, but it pales in comparison to your library.

    I like that you brought up theology and common sense. Common sense (and a good sense of humor) goes very far in life. I’ll use an example that I have shared with friends through the years.

    When Our Lord met the Samaritan woman in John 4, He could have told her the following: “I am the Son of God, the 2nd Person of the Blessed Trinity. Because of my hypostatic union, I am a Divine Person with 2 natures. I have a divine nature and a human nature via my incarnation. I was sent here by my Father. I can forgive your sins. Unless you eat my flesh and drink my blood, you will not inherit eternal life. And one other thing, at the end of the world, I am going to raise all the dead in their graves when I descend from the clouds and I will judge the entire world.” Had He said this to her, that would have been 100% true of course. But she would have run so fast the other way it would have been hilarious! But instead He said to her, “Will you give me a drink?” He met her where she was at, engaged her in conversation, and won her heart over to Him. We must do likewise.

    -TradWarrior

    ReplyDelete
  27. Can you respond to accusations of prelest against Catholic saints by eastern heretics

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon9:06
      That would require a whole post. Perhaps at a future date, I will do that.

      God Bless,

      ----Introibo

      Delete
  28. Thank you for this post. It is good to meditate on the nature of the Divine, which is mostly unfathomable to our limited intellect in this life. But to understand God is less important than to love and obey Him.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Thank you cairsahr_Saint Joseph!

    ReplyDelete
  30. This is great Dominic. I have a similar journey. I communicated with Father's Cekeda and Stepanich on this. I was almost convinced by the biological brothers in 2009 but was not sure why no SV clergy that I was aware of taught this. I knew it wasn't human respect, after all they are SV. Michael Cain, Griff Ruby, Tom Droleskey and Mario Derksen all also helped me. The CMRI website. All the research I did. Especially when I found out the Saints Bellermine and Alphonsus taught BoD AFTER the Council of Trent. I knew they both didn't misunderstand the Council!!!

    ReplyDelete