Monday, March 28, 2022

An Enemy Hath Done This


To My Readers: I'm traveling for work, and I'm glad that I have this guest post from Lee! Once more, he gives us great food for thought and insight. My schedule would have made a post this week impossible for me, so my thanks to Lee again! Please comment as always. For people who want a response from me, I will be checking comments and responding, although it may take me a little longer to answer than usual. 

God Bless you all, my dear readers---Introibo

An Enemy Hath Done This
By Lee

In our world today we are told that factual information is actually misinformation, that "drag time story hour" promotes healthy gender fluidity, that white man is born with privilege and is inherently racist, that elections are perfectly fair with Joe Biden really receiving 81 million votes, that the unvaccinated are a threat to others getting infected, even though many have died from adverse reactions by receiving the vaccines, and so on and so on and so on. While the dumbing down of culture continues and advances us into the next phase of insanity, many are starting to wake up because of the effects.

Despite many being "red pilled" into seeing human civilization collapsing, there are very few who unfortunately recognize what has accelerated the overall decay. It's called The Great Apostasy. When did it officially start? There are many opinions as to when it started but there is no doubt that the gradual process began in the late 1950's, 60's and 70's. By the mid 70's the Catholic Church was unrecognizable compared to thirty years earlier. From new church architecture, to a new mass, to nuns wearing modified habits, priests not wearing their clerical garbs, to numerous annulments being granted, to the reading of Teilhard de Chardin and possibly Mahatma Ghandi, to women no longer wearing head coverings in Church, etc. What could possibly go wrong? It seemed as if sin no longer existed or if it did exist, only existed if you were trying to practice your Catholic Faith. Some courageous priests who didn't go along with everything knew this, but very few had the courage to challenge "Pope" "St." Paul VI, because it would ultimately mean excommunication. There is one priest who did and I shall bring his name to light.

A Courageous and Forgotten Cleric

Fr. Joaquín Sáenz y Arriaga who was born on October 12, 1899 in Mexico and was brought up in the spirit of the Cristero movement led by Fr. Miguel Pro and other Catholics who fought against the atheistic secular government of Mexico in the 1920s.

He became a Doctor of Philosophy, Theology and Canon Law, international author and lecturer who was ordained a Jesuit priest of the Roman Catholic Church on April 30, 1930 and celebrated his First Mass in the city of Guadalajara, Jalisco on May 2nd. He traveled the world in his battle to preserve Catholic tradition and the Mass as codified by Pope St. Pius V. One of three spiritual leaders at both Marches-On-Rome in the early 70's, Fr. Saenz was among the world's top Catholic Traditionalists. Withdrawing from the Jesuit Order when it became corrupted, he settled in Mexico City, running a Catholic residence for students. To many of his countrymen, he symbolized their fight against spreading Communism in Mexico. He is the learned writer of more than 60 books, devoted to exposure of the moral and theological corruption that quietly infiltrated the post-conciliar "Church" resulting from Vatican II, including: For Christ and Against Christ, Apostolate, The New Mass Is Not the One Catholic Mass and Vacant See.

What he was most known for was leading the fight against the changes implemented at the Second Vatican Council and his rejection of the new Conciliar Church (i.e., Vatican II sect), making him one of the first to propound the theological conclusion of sedevacantism.

Taken from his book The New Montinian Church (1971), pgs. 385-400 he writes (Emphasis added):


In these troubled times, the conscience of sincere Catholics is heavily burdened ... perhaps more so than at any other time in the Church's history. WITHIN OUR CONFLICT, WE HAVE A BURNING DESIRE TO REMAIN TRUE CATHOLICS TO THE FULL EXTENT OF THE WORD, just as our parents did. We realize that our day of judgment and of Divine Justice will come; we must justify our protection of the Faith. At the same time, we recognize that the direction of the Pastoral Council is to gradually change our acceptance of the traditional, apostolic doctrine of the Church ... and we rebel at this change of mentality. Those who firmly support the orthodox faith scandalize those who accept the changing doctrine of the Church. The orthodox Catholics are told: "IT IS THE POPE WHO COMMANDS IT. ABOVE ALL, WE MUST OBEY THE POPE."

To those who profess strong obedience to the Papacy, I say: St. Pius V, his predecessors Paul III, Julius III, Pius IV, were also Popes ... it was within their Papacies that the Ecumenical Council of Trent was celebrated; also Leo XIII, St. Pius X, Benedict XV, Pius XI, and Pius XII were Popes who solemnly and infallibly ratified the results of Vatican I. But there is obvious contradiction between teachings of the Pre-conciliar Church and what is today called the Post-conciliar Church and what they call a change in mentality, I, in good conscience, call a CHANGE IN FAITH.

In order to understand the reasons behind THIS CHANGE IN FAITH and the disconcerting silence of the Catholic Hierarchy, it is necessary to focus our attention on Pope MONTINI, THE MAN ... for it is only through knowledge of his background that anyone can understand his seemingly unexplainable activity; address themselves to his dialectics and realize why the MONTINIAN Church is totally distinct from the Church that emerged from the Council of Trent and Vatican I. For these Councils faithfully guarded apostolic tradition and we must never forget it!

Because we believe in God ... in Jesus Christ, true God and true Man; because we believe in the Holy Catholic Church (in Divine Revelation, traditional catechetics, dogmatic theology and the Church Councils as the basis of our divine Faith), we also believe in the powers of the Papacy and the ecclesiastical authority of our bishops. It is precisely because I (and many staunch Catholics) have the faith, that doubt swelled up within my soul, as discrepancies from traditional teaching became apparent. Suddenly I am faced with a monumental decision ... what to follow? Is Paul VI a legitimate Pope or not?

Some say that Paul VI is a captive; that he is forced to act against his conscience in order to save his life; that he has fallen into personal heresy; that drugs are intermittently administered to him (by his conspirator-captors). This hypothesis appears indefensible and unsatisfactory to us, as Paul VI continues in the Papacy with all his super-authority. In all of these instances, the "rock," THE SOLID FOUNDATION OF THE CHURCH, does not possess the immovable stability that guarantees the permanence of the Church.

In a second hypothesis, some believe that John B. Montini was validly elected Pope, but after the election he fell into personal heresy. For this reason, Paul automatically ceased being Pope and lost all of his powers and prerogatives. But his heresies are still manifest. Paul VI did sign the mistaken documents of Vatican II: he approved and imposed the Novus Ordo Missal ... and, for whatever reasons, he has not used his authority to correct substantial error, to save the essential parts of the Mass.

Still others maintain that the election of John B. Montini was invalid because false credentials and information was used to establish his qualifications. Some claim he was outside the Church and for a variety of reasons was unworthy of consideration for the Papacy. Thus, he was incapable of being validly elected.

Is Paul VI a legitimate Pope, or not? Failure to exercise sound judgement, based on solid information, would be reckless, scandalous and with dire consequences. BUT TO DENY THE EXISTENCE OF THE QUESTION IS APRIORISTIC, considering the relationship of the world and the Church today. We can not ignore the need to investigate and seek the truth. We have sufficient evidence of Paul VI's dialectic actions to demand an exhaustive investigation into his doctrines, both before and after his election. We should learn more about his personal life, his personal relationships with other people and organizations ... before, during and after the Council. Someday, when death will have ended his influence and power and our REVERENT FEAR fades into history, I have no doubt that an impartial and objective judgement will be made ... as has always been done concerning pontiffs of past centuries.

Though we desire to grow by the judgement of history, we find ourselves in a crisis today ... a circumstance whose implications urgently demand explanation and resolution in order to save our Catholic faith. We must end the terrible enigma of Pope Montini.

Let us examine pictures which have appeared in communications media of Paul VI with the Pectoral of Judaism and the Ephod of the great Levite priest of Judaism ... therein, may be a decisive key. Notice the unorthodox ritual sign above the chest of the Pope and keep in mind the current subversion of the Church, the confessed infiltration of the Jews, Masons, and Communists into the clergy. Though we do not know the total extent of Pope Montini's secret and public relations with the worst enemies of the Church, we can study the steps he has taken to reform the Church, destroy its structure and, little by little, eliminate the Marks of Catholicism, blending the Church into other religions. I exhort you to remember Montini's visits and discussions at the United Nations and the Geneva World Council of Churches; his ecumenical surrender, his humanistic dialog lacking spiritual quality. I believe we have the right ... even the obligation ... to ask this question: Is John B. Montini a true Catholic ... or, is he an infiltrator, a Jewish director for the Mafia? I have been suspicious for some time. Now, I have near-certain evidence that Paul VI is not a legitimate Pope, but an anti-Pope ... a trained Jew, employed by the Mafia to use diabolical but undiscerned methods, employing time, money and the unquestionable ability of those who have always dreamed of dominating the World.

For centuries, the Church has preached and fought against secularization, militant atheism, anticlericalisms. Recall such bloody, religious persecution as followed Calvary ... remember Spain and Mexico. Who would have thought the SILENT CHURCH today, would be the center of convergence for national and international statesmen, especially those from the Communist world; those dominated by Masonry or international directors of Judaism? Who would have believed that the hard line against Communism (taken by previous Popes) would change itself into friendly "dialog" with the comings and goings of Cardinals Bea, Willebrands, Suenens and Koening? The persecution of the Church in Yugoslavia, Hungary and Cuba has terminated ... has been replaced with cordial diplomatic relations, in what appears to be a compromise between the Vatican and these atheistic states.

Though their dictatorial governments and attending laws persist, the Vatican collaborates in a true and progressive integration (according to the words of the Papal Nuncio of Cuba), implanting Communism as the indispensable preparation of a climate ready for world domination by Judaism. The glorious martyrdom of Cardinals Mindszenty and Stepinac was the price with which Paul VI purchased coexistence and collaboration between these two rivals.

In their Messianic materialism, the directors of Judaism dream of an implementation of world government wherein they are the masters and we are their slaves. They recognize that the insurmountable wall that lies in the path of this program of conquest is the religious wall ... in particular, the wall of the Catholic Church. By experience, they know that slander, prisons, even death, does not crush the faith ... it only enlivens it. They know very well that in order to destroy the Church of Christ they have only one road left ... INFILTRATION. Thus, THE CASE OF ANACLETUS II IS REPEATING ITSELF, the infiltrators, denounced by Pius X, have invaded the hierarchy and have even captured the Chair of Peter.

To have a world government, it is imperative to establish a one world religion; the religion of universal brotherhood, of "ecumenism," of "dialog" ... a kind of syncretized religion, which eliminates and silences the dogmas, turns the rites towards worldly things, compromises customs and suppresses discipline. Thus, all religions melt into only one religion, supported and complimented by a world government.

And what would be the perfect coverup for this intelligent program? Why, the Council of the Catholic Church, wherein prelates are skillfully guided by Pope Montini, decreeing (himself) the "ECUMENISM, " the "AGGIORNAMENTO," the "RELIGIOUS LIBERTY," the "REFORM" of liturgy, morals, discipline, rites and dogmas. All to be accomplished with skill, dialectics and cunningness using two fronts ... the epistles and the promised spring of the Church, the new Pentecost. With the movement of the masses, the false laws, the watered-down celebration, the multiplication of national and international organizations (like Cursillos of Christianity; the Christian Family Movement, etc.), constant conferences of clergy and laity to indoctrinate the neophytes into the new religion; the "acts of living together;" the "experiments;" the post-conciliar terminology (authenticity, compromise, conscientiousness, relativism, desacralization, etc.) ... the most apt means were employed to engender the necessary confusion. They were designed to eliminate ancient prejudices and beliefs of those with scruples of conscience, that they might be logically led to the new religion ... the religion of universal brotherhood.

All this would be possible by placing the absolute power of the Church in the hands of the "Mafia." JUDAISM, PLAYING ITS CARDS DECISIVELY TO GAIN ITS AMBITION, PUSHED (as I indicated before) ALL THEIR RESOURCES INTO THE GAME. IT WAS NECESSARY TO INFILTRATE THE VATICAN!

Many who observed the weaknesses of Pope Montini (his vacillations; his ambiguities ... wherein his words were contradicted by his deeds; his double standards, evidenced by his friendly relations with sworn enemies of the Church), still recognize him as the legitimate Pope in spite of his heresy and unfulfilled obligations of his office. These people readily acknowledge that a future pope could be a false pope (an anti-pope), but they persist in maintaining the legitimacy of the present Pontiff. Frightened by the possibility that they are living through the reign of a false pope, they ignore all that history and theology has soundly taught us.

But I cannot ignore the evidence, the habitual adornment of the "EPHOD" in photograph after photograph of Paul VI, and the subsequent denouncement made by the Abbe de Nantes in his paper "Contra Reforma." My suspicions appear confirmed ... John Battista Montini was invalidly elected to the Papacy and, thus, is not a true Pope. Because of this ritualistic symbol of Judaism and Masonry, I suspect that Paul VI was not only the most efficient instrument of the "Jewish Mafia," but an integral part of the "Mafia." Thus, he wears on his breast these contradictory symbols ... the pectoral cross of Catholicism and the "Ephod, Breastplate of Judgement;" he wears the ring of the fisherman and displays the insignia of descendants of Caiphas, the great Levite priest.

Interesting information about the Breastplate of Judgement, the Pectoral of Jewry (its background, description and use in Masonic lodges) is given in the Encyclopedia of FREE MASONRY, published in San Antonio, Texas, by Albert Gallatin Mackey, M.D. 33 degree Mason (author of Dictionary of Free Masonry and a textbook about Masonic laws).

        "Called in Hebrew, SYMBOL OF THE ELECT, THE CHOSEN, THE PREFERRED, the breastplate of judgement, because through it the High Priest received divine responses, and uttered his decisions on all matters relating to the good of the commonwealth. It was a piece of embroidered cloth of gold, purple, scarlet, and fine white, twined linen. It was a span, of about nine inches square, when doubled, and thus made strong to hold the precious stones that were set in it. It had a gold ring at each corner, to the uppermost of which were attached golden chains, by which it was fastened to the shoulder-pieces of the ephod - the vestment worn by the High Priest over his tunic; while from the lowermost went two ribbons of blue. by which it was attached to the girdle of the ephod, and thus held secure in its place.

       "In the breastplate were set twelve precious jewels, on each of which was engraved the name of one of the twelve tribes. The stones were arranged in four rows, three stones in each row. As to the order of arrangement and the names of the stones, there has been difference among the authorities ... but perhaps the Vulgate translation is to be preferred as an authority, because it was made in the fifth century, at a time when the old Hebrew names of the precious stones were better understood than now. The order given in that version is as follows: emerald, topaz, sardius-jasper, sapphire, carbuncle-amethyst, agate, ligure-beryl, onyx, chrysolite ... The order in which they were placed, according to the Jewish Targums- is as follows, referring itself to the respective ages of the twelve sons of Jacob: Levi, Simeon, Reuben-Zebulun, Issachar, Judah-Gad, Naphtali, Dan- Benjamin, Joseph, Asher. These twelve original names (of the stones) are detailed in Exodus XXVIII ...

       "The Breastplate which was used in the first Temple does not appear to have been returned after the Captivity, for it is not mentioned in the list of articles sent back by Cyrus. The stones, on account of their great beauty and value, were most probably removed from their original arrangement and reset in various ornaments by their captors. A new one was made for the services of the second Temple, which according to Josephus, when worn by the High Priest, shot forth brilliant rays of fire that manifest the immediate presence of Jehovah. But Josephus adds that two hundred years before his time this miraculous power had become extinct in consequence of the impiety of the nation. It was subsequently carried to Rome together with the other spoils of the Temple.

       "Of the subsequent fate of the these treasures, and among them the breastplate, there are two accounts: one, that they were conveyed to Carthage by Genseric after his sack of Rome, and that the ship containing them was lost on the voyage; the other, and, as King thinks, in "Antique Gems" (page 137), the more probable one, that they had been transferred long before that time to Byzantium, and deposited by Justinian in the treasury of Saint Sophia.

        "The breastplate is worn in American Chapters of the Royal Arch by the High Priest as an essential part of his official vestments. The symbolic reference of it, as given by Webb, is that it is to teach him always to bear in mind his responsibility to the laws and ordinances of the Institution, and that the honor and interests of his Chapter should be always near his heart. This does not materially differ from the ancient symbolism, for one of the names given to the Jewish breastplate was the memorial, because it was designed to remind the High Priest how dear the tribes whose names it bore should be to his heart."

Knowing what the Freemasonry Encyclopedia tells us, and seeing this strange "amulet" actually worn on the breast of a Pope, I believe (without fear) that we may suspect the Jewish influence, the Masonic influence, or the combination of the two, on Pope Montini. Since this insignia has only been used by the most High Levite Priest or the Most High Masonic Priest ... and because no previous Pope has ever before carried this jewel over his breast ... our suspicions are with foundation and believable.

Paul VI knows very well what this "Breastplate of Judgement," the Ephod, signifies; he knows its origin is in the ritualistic dress of the Ancient Covenant; he is not ignorant of the fact that Masons, today, use it as a distinctive mark of their High Priest. Are we to naively believe that he ingeniously wears this "amulet" to humor those who gave it to him, not knowing the responsibility it implies?

Since the Vatican II Council proclaimed the end of "the most triumphant and unalterable Church" and the beginning of "the Church of the Poor," Paul VI removed the Pontiff's Tiara and sold it to the highest bidder at the New York World's Fair. Today, this same person has no scruples in wearing so valuable an "amulet" before those receiving first orders, NOT presenting himself like a Pope of the Catholic Church, the successor of Peter, The Vicar of Christ ... but like the Levite High Priest, the successor and representative of Caiphas.

It is incompatible that the pectoral Cross of the Pope be worn with this strange "amulet" of the Old Covenant ... an "amulet" used in the religion of promise and preparation, a symbolic ritual of the High Priest signifying divine preference. Wearing this "amulet" in the New Covenant, on the breast of the Vicar of Christ, could signify a denial of Christ, of His religion that is no longer promised but is the splendid Truth. It would seem that Paul VI uses this ritualistic symbol of the Most High Levite Priest to tell us that he does not accept the Truth, supporting the symbolic figure of the promise made by God. When the pectoral of Jewry, the Ephod, is united with the Cross of Christ, Pope Montini gives us the impression of someone desiring to join the Christ to the anti-Christ. "This is the characteristic of a bad Angel," says St. Ignatius, "that he transforms himself into a `good' Angel (appearing as the Angel of Light) in order to enter a devoted soul and steal it away."

Going back to my earlier quotation from the Encyclopedia of Free Masonry, we find the agreement which ties the Jewish Mafia to the Masonic Lodges. It is clearly demonstrated that Judaism begot the Masonic movement as a major instrument in its satanic effort to destroy Christ and His Church. Pope Montini, displaying the Pectoral of Jewry (the Ephod), proclaims himself as the obedient servant, the sympathizer and friend of Judaism and Masonry. This is more than coincidence ... it strongly suggests that John Battisti Montini, Jewish by family ancestry, is the agent of the "Mafia" trained to infiltrate and dominate the Church. Cure de Ars has written: "It is impossible to be aware of Hebrew conduct, without becoming full of fear." It is incredible that these people, historically chosen and predestined by God, have (through their iniquities) transformed themselves into lasting enemies of God and persecutors of Christ.

In order to examine the motives of Paul VI, we must investigate the actions, statements and personal background of John Battisti Montini:

Who are the ancestors of the Montini family? The "Gold Book" of Italian nobility, published as the 1965-1968 edition, does not mention the MONTINI name. However, the "Gold Book" of 1962-1964, on page 946, mentions MONTI OF CORTE; on page 947, MONTI GUARNIERE, MONTICELLI GHIZZI is named as MONZA; on page 994, we find for the first time MONTINI ... a namesake designation related to the familiar Brescia family of nobility, native of Val Sabbia, from which Montini derives his nobility and original lineage of Hebrew origin (this Brescia family is an outgrowth of the original Bartoleme (Bartolino) of Benedictis of Hebrew background). Montini's ancestral line traces itself through Lumezzano, Sarezzo, Nave and Concesio of Brescia. 

The name repeatedly appears as noted in the register of "Country Noblemen" between 1946 and 1948. In the gallery of the House of MONTINI from Sarezzo, a great genealogical tree compiled by Angelo Basio (born 1795 and councilman of the community) is preserved. This document records noteworthy activities of members of the Montini family in such professions as notary publics, doctors, lawyers, religious and ecclesiasticals ... some achieved fame in their chosen occupations. According to the Apostolic Constitution "Urbem Romanum," published January 4, 1746, the family was accepted into the Roman Nobility ... its coat of arms consisted of 3 mountains with 3 fleur-de-lis superimposed; and, at times, surrounded by 3 heads of birds. Components of this same heraldic symbol decorate, in different arrangement, the front of silver plates displaying a profile of Paul VI facing a mountain of 6 peaks, his head encircled by 3 fleur-de-lis.

The parents of Paul VI were George Montini and Judith Alghisi. George (the father) was born in 1861 and died in 1943. Ludovocio, brother of Paul and Senator of the Republic, was born on May 8, 1896. John Battisti, the man known as Paul VI, was born in Concesio (Brescia) on September 26, 1897.

On December 14, 1969, Martin Descalzo (a Spanish journalist and progressive parish priest) published an article in the "ABC" of Madrid, headlined in bold letters, attributed to the Vatican Secretary for Unity ... but later it was acknowledged by the North American Secretary of Relations between Catholics and Jews ... a position filled by a Cardinal. Here is what it said:

1. That Judaism is the deposit of liberty, dignity and other human values which the Church must consider in its attitudes and aspirations for mankind.

2. That, after 2000 years, the Church has recognized its errors, asks forgiveness of the Jews and desires to establish a dialog with them.

3. That Jews are the only elected and preferred people with whom God has established and maintained a permanent, indestructible bond.

4. That this religious bond (here's the purpose of the article) confers the right to possess the Promised Land and CALLS FOR ALL CHRISTIANS TO RECOGNIZE the establishment of the State of Israel.


6. That the Old Testament is automatically and independently valid in its own right ... it does not require the New Testament for understanding or explanation of its meaning.

7. That the Church should avoid Bible readings that are unfavorable to the Jewish people, especially the one concerning the death of Jesus.

8. That Jesus, Himself, is a descendant of the Jewish people: He identified Himself with His people in nearly everything. When He opposed His people, He did it internally, as the prophets before Him ... within the law of his people.

This article, denying the Divinity of Jesus Christ and the divine institution of the Church, previously attributed to the Vatican Secretary for Unity, was published in a Spanish daily newspaper ("ABC") having monarchical tendencies, with the consent of a Cardinal representing the American Secretary of Judeo-Christian Relations. For a person who objectively studies the present situation of the Church, this article is very symptomatic. In earlier times, this monstrous article would never have been published in Spain ... official and ecclesiastical censorship would have prevented it. Now, no one objected; no one said anything. The article appeared without protest. Yet it was Spain whose Catholic Kings published the Decree of Jewish Expulsion, banishing them from their land. This new, updated Spain magnifies the change in law, denying its history and traditions.


God, in His infinite mercy, continuously offers us the inexhaustible help of His divine grace that we may attain eternal salvation. He gives us sufficient spiritual strength and knowledge that we will not be deceived by our enemies nor mislead from the path of salvation by the cunningness of Satan. Inspired by the Holy Ghost, a long line of past Popes has warned us of the painful prelude to the indescribable tragedy we are witnessing today ... a course of events whose background stretches across centuries. Pius VI , in his speech on the martyrdom of Louis XVI: Gregory XVI, in his frequent and grave warnings; Pius IX, in his Encyclical "Quanta Cura" and his Syllabus; Leo XIII, in his learned encyclicals, especially "Humanum Genus;" St. Pius X, in his "Pascendi," in his new Syllabus and in his condemnation of The Sillon (founded by Mark Sannier); Pius XII, in his Encyclical "Humani Generis" and his lucid instructions of May 31 and Nov. 2, 1954 to the Bishops around the world, alerting them and clearly explaining the means by which they were to defend themselves against OCCULT POWERS.

According to the pontifical teaching of such eminent prelates as Msgr. Delassus and Msgr. Jouin as well as the brave writers Leo Poincins, Peter Virion and Maurice Pinay, a dreadful truth was foretold of A SATANICAL PLOT FOR WORLD DOMINATION by the Counter-church; a plan wherein the agents of Satan already considering themselves victorious - do not hesitate to publish these declarations. Not only do we recall Stanistas Guaita, the economist Roca of St. Yves d'Alveydre, etc. and Sinarquia, but this plot is amply confirmed by the "Judicial Records of Learned Scholars from Sion," discovered at the end of the last century, due to an error (the OCCULT POWER would never have permitted these documents to be published voluntarily, since their very nature was one of ultra-secrecy).

It is a shame that these warnings, condemnations and revealing records were not heeded by our ecclesiastics or faithful Catholics. Most everyone showed little interest in their reliability, though they did not deny the incredible possibility. And today, while suffering through the collapse of the organized Church, we still doubt the existence of THIS INFERNAL JUDEO-MASONIC CONSPIRACY, while it clearly celebrates its early stages of victory. Why do people ignore the pontifical teachings ... the theologians and historians who have been telling us of this deceitful danger, this grave crisis that exists in the Church's history? To discover the cause of this crisis, we must acknowledge the existence of the Luciferian Occult Power and accept the sincerity of the secret plot ... a plot that the Holy See possessed and was published by Cretineau Joly in his writings: "The Roman Church before the Revolution" and "The Judeo-Masonic Plot Against the Church."

In the 18th Century, the Jew, Adam Weishaupt (leader of the Order of Illuminati), wrote: "The Free Masons should control all men of every class, nation, and religion; dominating them without obvious compulsion; uniting them through a strong bond; inspiring them with enthusiasm to spread common ideas; and with utmost secrecy and energy, direct them toward this singular objective throughout the world. IT IS THROUGH THE INTIMACY OF SECRET SOCIETIES THAT THESE OPINIONS WILL BE FORMED." (From the original writings of the Order of the Illuminati - 1765, Munich, as cited by Barruel in his "Memoirs Explaining the History of Jacobinism").

The important idea is to control "public opinion." In his leaflet, "How To Form Public Opinion," Maurice Talmeyer describes this strategy and its dreadful effect: "After men have declared themselves and become dedicated to a single school of thought, they are capable of convincing others. Thus, `public opinion' unfolds and solidifies without people being aware of the controls. A `consensus' is formed among people who do not consciously identify with each other, but learn to think and judge the same way, performing as planned. Though this `consensus' was artificially contrived, it publicly appears and quickly influences our society."

And Weishaupt issued the order: "Train Christians to believe that Jesus Christ was the great inventor of the Masonic trinomial, `liberty, equality, and fraternity'; that this is the doctrine taught by Him, but should be understood according to the interpretation of the Order." "Our doctrine is the same divine doctrine that Jesus Christ taught to His disciples, the evolution of His intimate and true feelings having been confided to the secret discourses of the Orders. And here's the plot: This doctrine (taught and explained) offers all humanity the way to achieve complete liberty ... no one has so adequately explained the road to liberty as our Eminent Jesus of Nazareth."

From Florence, on August 5, 1806, Simonini exposed the plan of the Occult Power to Abbe Barruel; a plan that one of the most-high dignitaries had told him in confidence. Immediately, the Abbe communicated this to Pope Pius VII, who assured us of the authenticity and cited these essential passages:

4. In Italy, they already count among their members more than 800 clergymen, including as many secular priests as those from an order, among which are many parish priests, professors, and prelates as well as some bishops and cardinals who, for this reason, have not lost hope of having a pope of their party.

5. That they also have many men of their party among the clergy in Spain.

6. They are considering the destruction of the Borbons family (their greatest enemy) within the next few years.

A short while later, high ranking leaders resumed their drive towards identical ends, instructing Christians that "Christianity is essentially a democratic doctrine that teaches equality and brotherhood." One secret instruction, dated 1819, said precisely: "An idea has eternally inspired the minds of men to aspire towards universal renewal: the audacious day when Italy shall be liberated; then THE LIBERATION OF THE ENTIRE WORLD, establishing a Federal Republic, the peace of brotherhood. But there is one tremendous obstacle, THE CHURCH. Our goal is the same as Voltaire's in the French Revolution; TOTAL ANNIHILATION OF CATHOLICISM AND THE SPIRIT OF CHRISTIANITY ... the Pope, whomever he shall be, has not yet seen fit to join the Secret Societies; therefore, the Secret Societies must take the first step toward conquering the Church. With the establishment of acceptable standards, we must show them the dangers of fanaticism; they must consider the happiness they will have by extending the great principles of social equality and religious liberty, turning against intolerance and persecution. And they will conclude: `The law of social progress is here and only here; do not bother attaining it any other way.'"

"This above all we should earnestly seek (and acquire) with the same desire with which the Jews hope for their Messiah ... A POPE THAT MEETS OUR REQUIREMENTS ... ; and for this reason, TO DESTROY THE ROCK UPON WHICH GOD HAS BUILT HIS CHURCH. When we have the small finger of Peter's successor compromised into the plot, it will serve to organize this Crusade against all the Urbanos II and all those San Bernardos of Christianity ..."

"It is necessary that our forces achieve this goal. But, how? The unknown is not yet known. Nevertheless, nothing shall dissuade us from this course; on the contrary, everything pushes us toward it ... we ardently seek the best counsel of the Supreme Court ... " These counsels are truly Luciferian.

"Smash the enemy, whoever he shall be; smash his power or strength with slander and malicious accusation; but, above all, smash it while it is still new. It is the Youth we must reach; without their realization, we must entice the youngsters and prepare them under the banner of Secret Societies. To accomplish this, we must be as pure as doves, but as cunning as a serpent," ... it is a normal practice to rearrange these directions and expose them as standard under the veil of "keeping absolutely secret" all that relates to the HIGH PLACE, "because (it is understood that) anyone who reveals the secrets, voluntarily or involuntarily, automatically signs his own death sentence."

"Therefore, in order to secure a Pope that meets our requirements, we must prepare a generation worthy of his kingdom. Forget the older, more mature peoples; go to the youth and, if possible, even the infants ... ; immediately, earn a sound reputation for yourself in schools, colleges and universities ... also, in seminaries. Then, after gaining the confidence of the professors and students, influence those preparing to become priests and who seek your favor. Thus, our doctrines will be planted in the hearts of younger clergy and be accepted throughout the convents. Within a few years, these young clergy, through the success of these events, will have invaded all operations; these young clergymen will eventually become those that govern, administer, advise and make up the counsel for the Supreme Court; they will be the ones called upon to elect the next Pontiff ... a Pontiff, who, like his contemporaries, has been imbued with those Italian and humanitarian principles which we have begun to place in circulation."

"Having earned the loyalty of the Pope, whose position we have given him ... ; the clergy will march under your banner because they will believe the Pope marches under the banner of the Apostolic keys ... thus, your trap is extended into the innermost corners of sacristy, seminaries and convents ... conquering friends to the right of the Apostolic Chair. WHEN THIS IS ACCOMPLISHED, YOU WILL HAVE ESTABLISHED A REVOLUTION LEAD BY THE TIARA (emblematic of papal authority) and the pluvial cape ... A REVOLUTION BROUGHT ABOUT WITH LITTLE FORCE, BUT WILL STRIKE A FLAME IN THE FOUR CORNERS OF THE WORLD."

And in other instructions, they said: "Flatter all the passions, even the most wicked, making them appear virtuous ... it is necessary that the teaching of the Church appear to violate public morality ... in order that a Papal revolution can triumph ... giving the torch to all who aspire to carry it ... subtly slipping the seed of our dogmas into their spiritual lifestyle ... so that clergymen and laymen convince themselves that Christianity is essentially a democratic doctrine." (Published writings of 1765 in Munich, cited by Barruel in his "Memoirs Explaining the History of Jacobinism.")

On August 9, 1839, Vindice wrote to tell Nubius that he condemns those individual assassinations blamed, with hateful cynicism, on the Carbonarios: "We will not individualize crime simply to propagate it in proportions to love of country and hatred of the Church. Catholicism does not fear the sharp dagger as much as the Monarchy; but these (two) foundations of social order will destroy themselves through moral corruption. We will never relinquish our efforts to corrupt ... We will not make martyrs unless we can make it a popular vice among many peoples. That everyone accepts the vice as part of life; that they completely absorb it ... making vicious hearts that cast Catholicism into oblivion. It is this corruption that we must spread far and wide; corrupting the people and the clergy; in the end, this corruption will carry the Church to its grave."

And what were the results obtained by the Occult Powers? On April 3, 1824, two months after issuing the high command of the Supreme Court, Nubius wrote: "there are certain members of the clergy, especially in Rome, who have swallowed the bait, hook, line and sinker." And on April 3, 1843, still on the same subject, he wrote: "We must carry on, by whatever means possible, even though poorly planned, to win our REVOLUTION FOR A POPE."

In 1845, another chief of the Supreme Court made a proposal concerning the clergyman Gioberti: "The priest Gioberti talks to the clergymen in their own language and I am pleased to tell you that we are introducing the doctrines of liberty and Italian independence everywhere, with the Pope taking the lead. And we have won over many members of the clergy, both secular and of orders; they have literally convinced themselves that Catholicism is essentially a doctrine of democracy. Each day the party enlists more and more experts within the clergy. Gioberti's new book, written especially for priests, is awaited with impatience."

On one hand, Chiefs of the anti-Christian conspiracy congratulate themselves on the success of their detestable activities; on the other hand, the Secretary of State at the Vatican discloses his agonizing fears in a letter dated August 8, 1845: "Our young clergy are already imbued with liberal doctrines ... they have abandoned their serious studies. Most of the clergy who will follow us into positions of responsibility are a thousand times more infected with the liberal vice ... ; the majority do not recognize the character or the nature of things that are happening, yet they allow themselves to be convinced by mere suggestions, wherein the great crisis of the Church was born. Among ecclesiasticals everywhere there appears an identical spirit of discord ... they break away from traditions, converting themselves to the philosophy of Modernism, substituting love of neighbor, the spirit of the heresy ... the prideful individual dwelling in darkness."

The result of Lucifer's plan, (under the names of "aggiornamente," ecumenism, religious liberty, the conciliar spirit, the reform of the Church) is occurring everywhere. Stanislas de Guaita endeavors "to use Christian theology with its esoteric splendour to transform and enrich church policy without anyone suspecting it." (Essaid de Sciences Mandites, 1, Page 159). Roca, an ex-canonist, responded: "My beloved brother in Jesus Christ, I do not argue with any of your judgements. We are in agreement on all points of the secret doctrine" (i.e., according to the writings of Papus), "introducing our concepts into the teachings that Christ gave to the twelve and later to the seventy two." "We have no problems with the Protestant churches; our existing relationship is the same as that existing between Free Masonry and the Synagogue; the only problem we have is the opposition of the Roman Catholic Church" (F. Marsoudon: "Le Temple," Sept. Oct. 1946, pg. 34).

As we have seen before, Roca foretold liturgical anarchy under the pretext of restoring the original concepts: "I believe the divine rites and regulations of the liturgy, the ceremonies, the rituals and the precepts of the Roman Church can undergo immediate change, through an Ecumenical Council ... a transformation, restoring the simplicity of the golden Apostolic Age, wherein we will adapt it to our state of conscience and modern worldliness." "Make preparations for the sacrifice, a properly executed termination ... THE SURRENDER OF THE PAPACY: to be lost under the sacred rules of the last Council. The Papal Caesar will be crowned a victim for the sacrifice." "THE THEOLOGY OF SCIENCE, which the adult population is eagerly demanding, HAS REPLACED THE MYSTICAL THEOLOGY." 

"They are hastening the destruction of the `Summa Theologica' and substituting the `Scientific Summa'." "A SUBLIMELY NEW CHRISTIANITY, PROFOUNDLY TOLERANT, TRULY UNIVERSAL, DOGMATICALLY DEFINED IN ENCYCLOPEDIAL FASHION ... A UNIVERSAL ORDER WHEREIN ALL RELIGIONS CAN IDENTIFY GOD WITH HUMANITY, which, before my very eyes transforms Christ into the entire universe." And Pignatelli, in his "Batailles Maconniques," Pg. 29, wrote: "Only in a theocratic society, having the universal character of FREEMASONRY, will it be possible someday to unite Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, Europe and Asia under the same ideals and within a common faith." And the Grand Orient confirms: "FREE MASONRY WILL BECOME THE SUPERCHURCH; THE CHURCH THAT WILL REUNITE ALL RELIGIONS." (Bulletin of the Grand Orient no. 37, `Politique et Maconnerie'). THE RELIGION THAT WILL BE SUBSTITUTED FOR CHRISTIANITY SHOULD BE AN ORDER WITHIN WHICH ALL RELIGIONS ARE UNITED." 

We aspire to have no intermediary between God and ourselves. Therefore, it is probable that the future religion will have priests of every faith ... thus, introduction would be through widespread schools of religion and the symbolism will help thinking people to discover those truths hidden deeply within the human soul." "After assimilating Christianity and other current forms of spirituality, the world of the future will be established and, if allowed, principles analogous to the phenomenon of total collectivism will be systematically taught and a form of pantheism will be born, wherein all the modes of present day thinking will be blended; united into a new, inconceivable dynamism to achieve their objectives."

But Roca combined the formative elements of this new Christianity: "You must have new dogmas; a new religion; a new ministry, and new rituals that very closely resemble those of the surrendered Church in the same way that the Catholic Church adapted from the Mosaic Church, its dead Mother." "Using logic and knowledge, everyone will become enlightened and the faith will disappear ... science will rule the world; because it will be accepted as the same God as humanity." "In this hour, each of us has a duty to encourage the evolution that will transform the Papacy, enabling us to put on the armor of new worldly spirit and scientific rational."

"From the one Universal church, various religions derive their dogmatic beliefs; they unite their convictions relative to the existence of a Supreme Being ... a life after death, the immortality of the soul in the same way that love of neighbor is proclaimed by all religions as being first among all the commandments." (World Spiritual Congress, Brussels, 1946).

"THE UNIVERSAL, GOD-LIKE REIGN OF LIBERTY, JUSTICE AND EQUALITY AS IDEALS OF THE SOCIO-ECONOMICS OF BROTHERHOOD; THIS IS THE SACRED TRINOMIAL ZEALOUSLY PREACHED UNDER THE BANNER OF SINARCHISM" (a 1937 Fascist movement formed in Mexico to establish a totalitarian, clerical state). We would say, this is the rule of Lucifer. Roca proclaimed the "conversion" of the Pope to the new spirit of the world ... after which he (the Pope) directed the Ecumenical Council to restore the simplicity of the Golden Apostolic Age of the Church:" The old Pope (John), having broken the silence, and started the transition of this great religious controversy, goes to his grave. He did his duty as the oracle of Christ ... having confirmed those of similar religious philosophy: that is to say, those new voices who will tell the entire Christian community that their Redeemer has fully accepted it. Science - the sacred one who enlightens - reigns supreme in the world as modern civilization ... the proclaimed daughter of the church, heir to the promises of God, our Lord, and the true meaning of the parables. 

"Pronouncing his own deposition, the Roman Pope, in a papal bull, voluntarily disengaged himself from traditional forms of papal control, declaring fulfillment of his mission as the originator ... giving broader scope to the predominate business of the new Pontiff, the new Church and the new ministry he installed prior to his death ..." "It should be readily seen by everyone that the new order grew logically out of the old order ... traditional roles will be consequently transformed into the new worldly organization by the light of the Gospel." "This new Church, even though it does not preserve the scholastic discipline and rudimentary form of the old Church, will (nevertheless) receive canonical ordination and jurisdiction from Rome." "It is essential that the liberation advance itself by the law of Evolution, openingly following the holy Gospel's divine direction towards development of the new humanity." Roca pointed out that the Pope, as head of the Ecumenical Council, would reform the entire Church. "He's a Pope of Faith and Piety; also a Pope of Gnosis (philosophic insight) and confidential knowledge." "He must precede someone who earns the world's admiration and should be a person to whom the world will pay homage in place of their Redeemer. This is a matter of demonstrating PERFECT ACCORD BETWEEN THE IDEOLOGY OF MODERN CIVILIZATION AND THE IDEOLOGY OF CHRIST AND HIS GOSPEL. IT WILL BE THE CONSECRATION OF THE NEW SOCIAL ORDER AND THE SOLEMN BAPTISM OF MODERN CIVILIZATION."

In light of these revelations, we are obligated to study the outcome of Vatican II Council and the Post-conciliar Church; we are obligated to see and recognize the existence of a prefabricated plan, emanating from the Mafia den, partially realized and expanding to complete fulfillment. Pope Montini's position appears clear to us ... total accommodation for this program of the anti-Church. We have ample reason to suspect that Paul VI could be the Pope of the REVOLUTION."


When Mexican Cardinal Miguel Dario Miranda y Gomez officially declared that Sáenz had incurred excommunication, Father (later consecrated bishop by Abp. Peter Thuc in 1981) Moises Carmona stated, "They excommunicated you for your fidelity to Christ, His teachings and His Church. Blessed excommunication! As long as it is for this reason, may all [such] excommunications come upon me!"

In his last testament, written on 25 April 1976, Fr. Sáenz wrote "My life and all that is most precious to me I have sacrificed for Christ, for the Church, and for the Papacy and he added: May the last cry of my soul be that of our Mexican martyrs: Long live Christ the King, Long live the Virgin of Guadalupe!"
He died of prostate cancer on 28 April 1976.

Jesus said "All you shall be scandalized in me this night. For it is written: I will strike the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be dispersed." St. Matthew 26:31

So as we see the world falling apart after the Satanic attack on Christ's Mystical Bride (The Catholic Church) it is as Pope Pius XII put it:

"Anyone, therefore, who knowingly ignores Christianity — the Catholic Church — or tries to hinder, demean, or undo her, either weakens thereby the very bases of society, or tries to replace them with props not strong enough to support the edifice of human worth, freedom, and well-being.
There must, then, be a return to Christian principles if we are to establish a society that is strong, just, and equitable. It is a harmful and reckless policy to do battle with Christianity, for God guarantees, and history testifies, that she shall exist forever. Everyone should realize that a nation cannot be well organized or well ordered without religion." Encyclical Meminisse Iuvat Prayers for the Persecuted Church [1958]. 

Monday, March 21, 2022

Are Aborted Babies Martyrs?


Abortion is the cold-blooded murder of an innocent unborn human being. As such, it is one of the Four Sins That Scream To Heaven For Vengeance. I have always been pro-life. I was very involved in the pro-life movement politically from 1990-2000, in trying to secure a Human Life Amendment to the United States Constitution. I have never even once voted for any candidate who was not 100% pro-life, and when confronted with candidates in any race that were not such, I would cast a write-in vote for myself. As of February 2021, there have been over 62 million legal surgical and medical abortions in the United States. That's an average of 1.29 million babies slaughtered each year in this country alone. (See There are no words strong enough to condemn such pure evil. 

Nevertheless, there are some "conservatives" in the Vatican II sect (and perhaps even some misguided Traditionalists) who call, or seek to have recognized, aborted babies as martyrs, the same as the Holy Innocents. This is especially true in the Vatican II sect where a private revelation called The Community [or Family] of Divine Innocence is promoted. The "seer," one Patricia de Menezes (b. 1940), has been claiming messages from "Jesus and Mary" since 1979, and that they want the "Church" [Vatican II sect] to proclaim aborted children as "companion martyrs of the first Holy Innocents." 

In this post, I will (1) set forth Church teaching on martyrdom, (2) show how the Holy Innocents fit that definition, (3) why aborted babies are not martyrs, (4) the dire practical and theological consequences of such a false teaching of martyrdom, (5) how the Vatican II sect, while rejecting the false revelations of "Divine Innocence" give credence to its teaching. 

Church Teaching on Martyrdom
The following points I condensed from Fr. Ronald Knox's wonderful treatise The Theology of Martyrdom , (1929)---all emphasis is mine: 

1. The word "martyr" means "witness." It means you give witness to the True Faith by your death. Martyrdom implies, not simply losing your life, but giving up your life. Your life is prematurely cut short in the interests of something greater than yourself. Neither suffering by itself, nor suffering followed by death is martyrdom properly so called.

2. The Church does not bestow the title of martyr upon those heroic priests, nuns, and layman who have persistently attended to the suffering in times of pestilence. St. Aloysius, whose death was brought on by such a labor was not canonized a martyr. These deaths were not the result of the assertion of religious truth against the enemies of religious truth. They laid down their lives for Christ's sake, but not for Christ's quarrel.

3. The faith one dies for can only be the unadulterated, Integral Catholic Faith; the One True Religion. To those who object that non-Catholics can receive Baptism of Desire, and it is therefore hypocritical to deny Protestants who, in good faith, die for a false belief the title of martyrs, it can be demonstrated their argument is without merit.  Baptism of Desire does not deny the objectivity of Truth, as this argument presupposes. The world tells us "Be good and you will go to Heaven, if such a place exists." A martyr is not someone who dies for what they believe, it is someone who dies for the Truth. Thomas Crammer died because he disbelieved in the papacy. St. Thomas More died because he believed in the papacy. Both cannot be true, so to make martyrs of both means either objective truth doesn't matter or doesn't exist.

4. As an adult, you must have the intention to die as a witness for the Truth. If a Traditionalist is killed in his sleep (unaware he was in any danger) by someone who is an enemy of the Faith, he does not qualify as a martyr. The Church means, by martyrdom, death undergone at the hands of those who hate the True Catholic Faith, for the sake of the True Catholic Faith; and undergone, in the case of adults, deliberately. Infants, killed for the sake of the True Faith, by those who hate the True Faith, die as martyrs without any intention necessary. They receive Baptism of Blood (if unbaptized) and their salvation is assured. (e.g. The Holy Innocents).

5. On the part of the enemies of Christ, a certain odium fidei ("hatred of the Faith") is necessary. A wholesale abandonment of the Faith, or hatred of all beliefs, is not necessary. To hate any article of True Faith/Morals because it is taught by the Church will suffice. Therefore, Henry VIII did not have to abandon every belief of the Church. Denying divorce and remarriage is adultery and hating that belief because the Church teaches it as true, was sufficient without more, to establish an odium fidei.

6. A soldier who takes up arms to fight a just war is not to be considered a martyr if he dies. Hence, the one who dies must not be guilty of provocation---that he died because he didn't kill the other man first. The exception is with captured soldiers who, now unarmed, are given the option of death or apostasy.

The Holy Innocents: True Martyrs

December 28 is the Feast of the Holy Innocents, the Catholic remembrance of the massacre of young children in Bethlehem by the wicked King Herod in his attempt to murder the Infant Jesus (St. Matthew 2:16–18). The Holy Innocents are true martyrs by reason #4 above:

 Infants, killed for the sake of the True Faith, by those who hate the True Faith, die as martyrs without any intention necessary. They receive Baptism of Blood (if unbaptized) and their salvation is assured. (e.g. The Holy Innocents). 

Fr. Gueranger in his monumental work, The Liturgical Year, Christmas Volume 1, Book 2, pgs. 278-284 discusses the Feast of the Holy Innocents. St. Bernard is quoted as saying:

Will anyone doubt whether a crown [i.e., martyrdom] was given to these Innocents? … If you ask me what merit could they have that God should crown them? Let me ask you what was the fault for which Herod slew them? What! Is the mercy of Jesus less than the cruelty of Herod? And whilst Herod could put these Babes to death, who had done him no injury, Jesus may not crown them for dying for Him?

We know infants and those deprived of reason can receive Baptism of Blood (BOB). (See theologian Ott, Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma,[1955], pg. 357). The great theologian, Cardinal Cajetan held that a pregnant woman who dies by BOB would have her unborn child share in her glory. The cardinal discussed this at the Council of Trent during deliberations on Baptism, and no Council Father objected to what he said (See theologian Dyer, Limbo: An Unsettled Question, [1963], pgs. 141-142). This seems to be the only case of the Church considering the killing of an unborn child as martyrdom; i.e., when his mother died a martyr. 

Answering "Divine Innocence:" Aborted Children are NOT Martyrs

Anyone interested in reading about the particulars of DeMenezes' "revelations" may read the website at The substance of the alleged messages is told as follows from the site:

This message is not just for Catholics it is for the whole of humanity.  Our Lord said it was “to bring home the lost tribes of Israel, the lost peoples of every nation so that we may all be one.” (Message dated 26th May 2001)  ‘No more Jew or Gentile, no more slave or free man’ (Gal 3:28) but all one people and family through, with and in Christ, the Saviour of all mankind. Through this inspiration Our Lord requests that the Magisterium of the Holy Catholic Church proclaim the martyrdom of all children killed before birth (through abortion and exploitation of embryos). Once these children are claimed by the Universal Church, their martyr witness to the nations will be heard and given voice in the Church calling the people to be one Holy Family and people of God. We can draw upon the magnificent grace of their martyrdom because we will all know that they are saints in heaven. This message shows the important link between the Novitiate of the Holy Family and the claiming of these children from every nation by the Catholic Church as ‘Companion Martyrs of the first Holy Innocents’.

Interestingly, there are Vatican II sect clergy, recognized as theologians by the sect, that support these revelations, and actually petitioned the Modernist Vatican to recognize them and proclaim aborted babies as martyrs. As a result, the "Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith" lead by Ratzinger under John Paul the Great Apostate, studied the issue. Surprisingly, the Congregation rejected recognition of the revelations and the designation of aborted babies as martyrs, giving four reasons--three of which are fairly accurate (proving that even a broken clock can be right twice every twenty-four hours).  In December of 2007, the answer of Ratzinger rejecting Divine Innocence stated they could not be accepted because of:

1. The exaggerated claims made for the Community of Divine Innocence.

2. The inappropriate words and phrases attributed to Jesus.

3. The questionable demand made concerning the status of aborted children.

4. The intemperate language used in the “Inspirations” when attacking Church authority.

I will give (a) the Modernist Congregation's assessment on each relevant point, (b) the response authored by DeMenezes and her Modernist theologians to the Congregation, and then (c) my commentary. 

The exaggerated claims made for the Community of Divine Innocence.
(a) De Menezes makes extravagant claims for the Community of Divine Innocence: “regarding all the different spiritualities and charisms within the Church, Our Lord showed me that they were like facets of a diamond, but the Way of Divine Innocence is the whole diamond”...At points an almost hysterical note enters the dialogue which is not compatible with a communication from the Word Incarnate: “Jesus: You are the beginnings of the New People of God’ (11.1.94)...
(b) Patricia states:
The whole diamond is all humanity, in the Holy Family and within the Church, as one Holy Family and people of God. Each community and order down the ages is one facet of the diamond. The community of Divine Innocence is also one facet of the diamond. When I studied jewellery (sic)I learnt that a stone cutter slowly releases the full brilliance of a diamond as it cuts each facet. Our Lord wants us all to understand the full vision of the whole diamond, so that we can co-operate with grace to bring about
that fullness which is the Church in all her glory. 

The statement “You are the beginnings of the New People of God” (11.1.94) is to be understood first as referring to the Church (cf. LG 9, 13). In every age there is a new People of God that responds to the newness of Christ’s definitive revelation...Those who respond to this message are indeed a "New People of God" in so far as they are members of the Catholic Church who truly live the spirituality of the Holy Family, which is the spirituality of the Church Herself, because it is centred (sic) on Christ.

(c) Divine Innocence is full of Modernist theology and cites exclusively to Vatican II and after; I did not see any pre-Vatican II Magisterial authorities cited. ("LG" refers to the damnable heretical document Lumen Gentium). The first statement about the whole "diamond" clearly implies that the Church is not a full, complete, and Perfect Society. The "People of God" is Vatican II-speak. Of course members of the Church die and go to their eternal destiny, while replaced by new members with their own set of challenges and victories. This in no way means the Church is somehow "new." 

The inappropriate words and phrases attributed to Jesus.
(a) The words and phrases attributed by De Menezes to Jesus in her ‘showings’ are at times strange and bizarre. They are not consonant with the sane and wise Gospel tradition. The ‘voice of Jesus’ which we hear in these revelations indulges again and again in a kind of colloquial chit-chat: “Jesus: So you don’t believe me? De Menezes: Sorry Lord it was just curiosity. Jesus: Curiosity killed the cat: let’s get back to St John. (4.12.93) Jesus: Tell them this university offers a Master’s Degree, your Lord and Master’s Degree, and I expect every student to attain First Class Honours with a P grade. P for perfection. (29.11.95). Menezes: Lord, the Way of Divine Innocence does not seem to be what the young want. . Jesus: What do the young want? Menezes: Excitement. Jesus: I can give them enough excitement to give them a heart attack!” (11.1.01)

(b) Patricia states:
What we ask to be considered with regard to the words and phrases attributed to Jesus is not only the style but the substance of the communication and whether this is consistent with Catholic teaching...The Gospel itself shows how Jesus sought to be intelligible in His teaching, using the language, phrases, sayings and examples familiar to the people of his time, for example “when you see a cloud rising in the west you say at once a shower is coming.” (Lk 12:54; Mt 11:17).

(c) That Christ would not express Himself in an unbecoming manner should be obvious. The lame attempt to claim He was using "language familiar to the people of His time," is laughable. Christ did use expressions about, e.g., how to try and discern the weather and make an analogy. He never spoke like some street punk. How about "ebonics" (i.e., African-American slang), would Jesus speak in ebonics? "Yo, man, don't be hatin' on my peeps. Chill, and keep the faith, yo." Please. 

The questionable demand made concerning the status of aborted children.
(a) The central message that De Menezes claims to have received since 1984, namely that the Church proclaim the martyrdom of all the innocent children deliberately killed before birth and acknowledge these unborn children as companion martyrs of the first Holy Innocents, is doctrinally problematic. A martyr is someone who bears witness to Christ. If the victims of abortion were to qualify for martyrdom it would then seem that all victims of any moral evil should be likewise deemed martyrs. De Menezes’ notion of a ‘Baptism of Love’ is not, as claimed, a development of doctrine. Rather it is an innovation which is difficult to harmonize with the teaching of the Church.

(b) Patricia states:
Although only one part of the inspiration, the request to the Magisterium to claim the children killed before birth for Christ and His Church involves many messages and requires detailed theological work in order to clarify how it may be possible, and why it is important. Through the help and guidance of a number of priests, some of them theologians of repute - and all of them loyal to the Church’s teaching - and through our own theological studies, we are fully aware of the doctrinal issues involved. Many
of the doctrinal issues surrounding the claiming have been addressed over the years.

(c) The Modernist Vatican should be informed that aborted infants as martyrs is far more than "problematic." I agree with them that "If the victims of abortion were to qualify for martyrdom it would then seem that all victims of any moral evil should be likewise deemed martyrs." The crazy idea of "Baptism of Love"(whereby the act of abortion allegedly renders the baby a martyr) is not found anywhere in the teaching of the Church, and is openly heretical. However, I do believe that Patricia De Menezes is correct in that it could be seen as a "development of [Modernist] doctrine" from Vatican II and its false popes. 

As to De Menezes' response: If Christ revealed this as truth, wouldn't He be able to explain it, so all could understand how it is possible and why it's important? She is still receiving "revelations" but gets no answers. The obvious reason is that the messages are false. 

The intemperate language used in the “Inspirations” when attacking Church authority.
As the "church" spoken of here is the Vatican II sect, there is no need to go into this reason as it is not relevant. 

Dire Practical and Theological Consequences
So-called Divine Innocence and the "Baptism of Love" whereby Christ crowns as martyrs all aborted infants, stems from the universalism of Vatican II and its "popes." 

From Vatican II:
This Church constituted and organized in the world as a society, subsists in the Catholic Church, which is governed by the successor of Peter and by the Bishops in communion with him, although many elements of sanctification and of truth are found outside of its visible structure. These elements, as gifts belonging to the Church of Christ, are forces impelling toward catholic unity. (Lumen Gentium, para. #8). This was the beginning of the Vatican II sect. The Church of Christ is not identical to the Roman Catholic Church, it merely subsists there in its "fullness" because it has all the "elements" of the Church of Christ. However, it subsists elsewhere too, according to how many "elements" each religion possesses. To have all the elements is best, but to have just some is good and also leads to salvation. Hence, paragraph #3 of Vatican II's Unitatis Redintegratio tells us Christ uses false sects as "a means of salvation." 

From Karol Wojtyla ("Pope" John Paul II):
Redemptor Hominis (1979), para. #13: Christ the Lord indicated this way especially, when, as the Council teaches, "by his Incarnation, he, the Son of God, in a certain way united himself with each man"(Emphasis in original). Continuing in the same encyclical, Wojtyla writes, Accordingly, what is in question here is man in all his truth, in his full magnitude. We are not dealing with the "abstract" man, but the real, "concrete", "historical" man. We are dealing with "each" man, for each one is included in the mystery of the Redemption and with each one Christ has united himself forever through this mystery. (Emphasis mine). This is universalism, plain and simple.

Evangelium Vitae (1995), para. #99: I would now like to say a special word to women who have had an abortion. The Church is aware of the many factors which may have influenced your decision, and she does not doubt that in many cases it was a painful and even shattering decision. The wound in your heart may not yet have healed. Certainly what happened was and remains terribly wrong. But do not give in to discouragement and do not lose hope. Try rather to understand what happened and face it honestly. If you have not already done so, give yourselves over with humility and trust to repentance. The Father of mercies is ready to give you his forgiveness and his peace in the Sacrament of Reconciliation. To the same Father and his mercy you can with sure hope entrust your child.(Emphasis mine). This implies unbaptized children in the womb are saved.

From Joseph Ratzinger ("Pope" Benedict XVI): 
In April of 2007, The International Theological Commission, a committee of 30 Modernist theologians who advise the "Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith" (the Modernist version of the Holy Office), issued a document entitled The Hope of Salvation for Infants Who Die Without Being Baptized. The document is a de facto elimination of Limbo, a state where babies who die without baptism are preserved from the pain of sense, but suffer the loss of the Beatific Vision of God, yet enjoying some natural happiness. It is true that Limbo, the state of those who die in Original Sin only, is not a dogma of the Faith. You can deny Limbo and you would not thereby be a heretic. However, the problems with the "elimination" of Limbo are both many and serious.

  • The implication of universal salvation is present no less than twelve times, in paragraphs #4, 6, 7, 8, 33, 43, 46, 52, 54, 57, 67, and 69. Montini ("Pope" Paul VI) has a funeral "mass" for unbaptized babies for the first time in 1970. (Para. #5). 
  • It borrows from the heretical universal salvation teachings of Fr. Hans Urs von Balthasar.
  • Specifically cited in the document are the teachings of arch-heretics Fr. Karl Rahner, and Fr. Jacques Dupuis 
  • Bottom line: Infants who have not been baptized go to Heaven because they have not committed any personal sins. They are not deprived of the Beatific Vision of God because everyone is entitled (!) to salvation.
From Jorge Bergoglio ("Pope" Francis):
Bergoglio believes in an "ecumenism of blood;" that members of false sects can be "martyrs." He stated on Vatican Radio, February 16, 2015:

"The blood of our Christian brothers and sisters is a testimony which cries out to be heard,” said the Pope.  "It makes no difference whether they be Catholics, Orthodox, Copts or Protestants. They are Christians! Their blood is one and the same. Their blood confesses Christ."

The Result: "Baptism of Love" is a Development of Vatican II
All the teachings from above lead inexorably to the following conclusions:
  • Original Sin is denied
  • It eliminates the necessity of Baptism. According to theologian Prummer, "Children of Catholic parents should be baptized at the earliest possible moment. Leo XIII fiercely condemned the postponing of Baptism of children" (See theologian Prummer, Handbook of Moral Theology,[1957] pg. 257)
  • All people are saved. Hell, Purgatory, and Limbo are "outdated, negative theology"
  • The Catholic Church is not the One True Church, outside of which no one is saved. All beliefs are more or less equally good and lead to Heaven
Building on this heretical edifice, martyrdom is no longer about dying for the True Faith, and killed by those who have an odium fidei. The "ecumenism of blood" means any faith (or even no faith--"atheists can go to Heaven")suffices, and no hatred for truth on the part of the killer is needed. Hence, why can't an unborn baby with no faith, who dies from a moral evil (abortion) be a martyr--Baptism of Love?

Divine Innocence had the audacity to claim St. Maria Goretti (infallibly canonized as a saint by Pope Pius XII in 1950), is a martyr who didn't die for the Faith--sheer blasphemy. St. Maria refused the sexual advances of her murderer, Alessandro Serenelli, because sex outside marriage is a mortal sin as taught by the Church. As he attempted to seduce her, the virtuous Maria told the scoundrel, "No! It is a sin! God does not want it!" Hating the doctrine of purity as the Church taught and as Maria lived by, he stabbed the saint to death. St. Maria Goretti died for the One True Faith by a man who hated its teaching about purity; she is a true martyr. 

Conclusion: "Abortion is good"
Pope Sixtus V taught in a 1588 Constitution that victims of abortion, being deprived of Baptism, are "excluded from Beatific Vision," hence abortion is a most grievous offense. If women are taught that unborn babies are not only destined for Heaven, but will receive a crown of exceptional glory for being martyrs, why not have an abortion? When fighting abortion it is of the utmost importance we declare that both their earthly life and eternal salvation with God in the Beatific Vision will be lost. Yes, they go to Hell (in the broad sense of the term), as they are separated from God. They are in a place or state not subject to the pain of sense or torture from demons, and probably a small degree of consolation/natural happiness. However, they have not reached the eternal destination for which all humans were created. Abortion is not some "ticket to Heaven as a martyr." God save us all, born and unborn, from the evils wrought by Vatican II.