Covering Up The Obvious

 

WARNING! The contents of this post may be found disturbing. Reader discretion is advised. The account I give at the beginning of this post is true and accurate. Only the names of all involved (except the Vatican II sect "bishops") have been changed. ---Introibo

It was the summer of 2019, and I received an unexpected message. I have a Facebook profile on which I rarely post and update infrequently. I use it for the primary purpose of staying in touch with friends who live far away.  On this particular day, I received a friend request from Peter, someone who grew-up down the block from me here in New York City. We knew each other since the age of five, and we were never friends. Peter was a bully and wasn't liked by many. He got involved in drinking and drugs at 13, but managed to get his act cleaned up and immersed himself in bodybuilding. 

Like many bodybuilders, Peter became narcissistic and even more disliked. He was the youngest of eight children of a devout Irish Catholic father, and Italian Catholic mother. His parents were tired of supporting him, so he took every civil service exam possible. At age 24, he was accepted to the NYC police academy, and became a cop. That was in 1989, and I had not heard any more about him until his friend request arrived thirty years later. 

As a teenager, I had made my dislike of him no secret, and told him to his face to stay away from me. Therefore, his friend request intrigued me, and I accepted. The next day I received a message from him via FB Messenger. He told me that he was sorry for the way he had treated me those many years ago. He had "found Jesus" and was contacting everyone he had ever wronged to personally apologize to them. He said he would like to meet me for lunch and apologize in person. As his request seemed very sincere, I accepted. We met in a diner in midtown Manhattan on a Saturday afternoon two weeks later. 

The man I met was a shell of his former self. Completely bald and sickly-looking, he shook my hand. "Thank you for coming. I'm really sorry for being such a [expletives deleted] towards you." I responded the only way a true Catholic could--I sincerely forgave him. We took our table at the diner, and after I told him what I had been up to the last three decades, he told me his story, one that was quite sad.  

Peter was a dedicated cop who made many arrests, over 90% of which ended in convictions. He moved up the ranks and in 1999 he was made a detective. He was at the Twin Towers when 9/11 took place, and lost three of his friends on the police force. The horrors of what Peter saw resulted in severe nightmares and hallucinations, to the point that he needed to be confined in an asylum where he spent several months on large doses of psychotropic medications. When Peter was released, he was diagnosed with a serious lung disease as a result of breathing in the toxins in the air at Ground Zero, and his physical health deteriorated as well. 

The NYC Police Department allowed Peter to retire with 75% of his salary tax-free for life plus medical benefits for his being incapacitated in the line of duty. He received a tidy sum up front as a "permanently injured first responder" from the State and Federal government. With that money, he bought a one-bedroom condo in a very nice section of Long Island. Both his parents were deceased, and none of his seven siblings wanted anything to do with him (they were like him in the past and none of them got along). He had no children and had never been married. Peter spent his days praying in his condo alone, only going out to buy food and other necessary items. His only three close friends were killed in 9/11. 

"I always admired how seriously you took religion, even as a teenager," he said to me. "I remember you left the Church to go to that Latin Mass priest on Long Island." [A reference to my spiritual father, Fr. Gommar DePauw---Introibo]. I told Peter I did not leave the Church, but the Vatican II sect, and it wasn't because I wanted to hear Mass in Latin. I explained the Great Apostasy and sedevacantism to him, as he listened intently. "Wow! That's heavy theological stuff," he replied. "But I'm finished with priests of any kind. Period." He reached into his coat on the seat next to him, and handed me some legal papers. "A big shot lawyer like you should understand this stuff." 

It was the beginning of a class-action lawsuit against the Diocese of Brooklyn, consisting of all of Queens County and Brooklyn in NYC. Peter was one of the plaintiffs. When he started smoking marijuana and taking amphetamines, he picked them up from a dealer who sold them in a schoolyard in Brooklyn next to a Vatican II sect church. Peter was very high one day, when he was approached by "Fr." Bill (invalidly ordained in 1969 by the false "Bishop" Mugavero, one of the first priests to be invalidly consecrated in 1968). Fr. Bill was 36, handsome and well-built. He told Peter that he could make him into a bodybuilder if he would give up drugs. Peter agreed.

He began working out at a gym with Fr. Bill, who drove to visit Peter's parents. The cleric made up a story on how they met, and told them he would make their son's body strong while keeping him out of trouble. His parents were delighted he was friends with a priest. They continued working out, and after a few months, Fr. Bill said he would need to "see how his body was developing" to make him even stronger. He took Peter to the rectory, and into his bedroom. He then told him to strip down to his underwear and do ten push-ups. While doing the push-ups, Fr. Bill jumped on top of him, removed the boy's underwear and forcibly sodomized him. 

When it was over, Fr. Bill told Peter that if he said anything to his parents, or stopped working out with him, he would tell his parents he saw him high on drugs and having sex with another boy (the first was true, the second a lie). Since he was a priest, they would believe him and disown Peter. Knowing how devout his parents were, he continued to be molested for the next year, until Fr. Bill was reassigned to a new parish--his tenth assignment in eleven years. Even more disturbing, the complaint alleges that Fr. Bill (who was finally reassigned to an all woman college before his retirement) had sexually assaulted over 200 (yes, two hundred) young boys. It further alleges (with evidence) that "Bp." Mugavero, his successor, "Bp." Daily, and his successor, "Bp." DiMarzio, all knew about Fr. Bill's crimes and covered it up. (The current "Bp"--Brennan did not take over until 2021 and is therefore not mentioned). At the time, the suit had joined over 90 plaintiffs. 

The New York State Legislature passed the Child Victims Act, allowing people like Peter to sue for sexual abuse no matter how long ago the abuse took place. It allowed all such lawsuits until August 13, 2021. Over 10,000 lawsuits were filed, and four of the eight Vatican II sect Dioceses in New York State immediately filed for bankruptcy protection. Peter told me, "You have no idea how pervasive it is--much worse than even the media portrays it." Two of his best friends that were killed in 9/11 were also abused. One victim's predator left the clergy and fled the country, the other victim's predator had died. 

In the year 2000, only Fr. Bill was alive and well in this country. Peter used his contacts as a detective to find his exact whereabouts. He and his two abused friends on the police force then began an elaborate plan to kill Fr. Bill and make it look like a gang killing. They spent a long time making sure they had alibis, the exact location where they would lure him, etc. Peter would make sure that after Fr. Bill got shot, he would be the one to go up to him, remind him of what he had done, and put the final bullet in his head, consigning his perverted soul to the flames of Hell. 

The execution was finally set for October 2001, but 9/11 intervened. When he first got his apartment, Peter thought of killing Fr. Bill alone and then shooting himself. He began to read the Bible one day, "believed in Jesus" and abandoned his plan. "I forgave him," he told me. "If we don't forgive others God will not forgive us. Before I am at total peace, I have to apologize to all I hurt in life by my words or actions. That's why I'm here with you today." As we got up to leave, we shook hands, and I hugged him. We exchanged phone numbers. I called him later that year and invited him to spend Thanksgiving and Christmas with my family and me. I couldn't stand the thought of him spending those days alone. He politely declined, saying he would be eating a turkey sandwich alone, and he liked it that way. We email about once a month, and I send him articles on the True Faith--he always thanks me for doing so. He awaits justice from the legal system.

What angers me isn't just the cover-up of the individuals responsible, but the cover-up by both the media and the Vatican II sect of the underlying problem that's the cause of it all---homosexuality. The truth must be suppressed in order for the myth of "homosexuality is normal" to continue. This post will expose the root cause of the abuse problem in the Vatican II sect. 

Covering Up The "H-Word"

In 1961, Bella Dodd, a famous Communist lawyer who embraced the Catholic Faith, admitted she was part of a plot to place Communists in the seminaries years before in the 1930s. She had personally helped over 1,000 such men into seminaries whose purpose would be to "change the Church beyond recognition." She had claimed such before, but never so forcefully. It was the eve of Vatican II. I know a man who spoke with Dodd personally. She said the Communists planted "soft men," a reference to sodomites. Why was it needed for them to be practitioners of unnatural vice? A non-pervert Communist might be converted to the Faith, but those burning with unnatural lust, surrounded by other men are not thinking of the things of God and are least likely to convert.

The transition from traditional teaching against homosexuality, to acceptance (if not promotion) happened at Vatican II and grew exponentially in the sect. Compare below:

Traditional Teaching:

The Third Lateran Ecumenical Council 1179 A.D. 

Canon 11: "...Let all who are found guilty of that unnatural vice for which the wrath of God came down upon the sons of disobedience and destroyed the five cities with fire, if they are clerics be expelled from the clergy or confined in monasteries to do penance; if they are laymen they are to incur excommunication and be completely separated from the society of the faithful..." (See http://www.papalencyclicals.net/councils/ecum11.htm; Emphasis mine).

Pope St Pius V:

Cum Primum  April 1, 1566:

"Having determined to do away with everything that may in some way offend the Divine Majesty, we resolve to punish, above all and without indulgence, those things which, by the authority of the Sacred Scriptures or by most grievous examples, are more repugnant to God than any others and raise His wrath: that is, negligence in divine worship, ruinous simony, the crime of blasphemy, and the execrable libidinous vice against nature. For such faults peoples and nations are scourged by God Who, according to His just condemnation, sends catastrophes, wars, famine, and pestilence ... and if he is a cleric, he will be subject to the same punishment after having been stripped of all his degrees [of ecclesiastical dignity]." (Emphasis mine).

1917 Code of Canon Law

Canon 2357: section 1:  Lay persons who have been legally found guilty of a crime of sexual immorality committed with a minor under 16 years of age or rape, sodomy, incest, pandering, are ipso facto infamous, besides being subject to other penalties which the Ordinary may deem proper to inflict.

Canon 2359: section 2: Deprives clerics (guilty of the same crimes enumerated above) of "any office, benefice, dignity, or position which they may have and in more serious cases be deposed."

(See Canonist Bouscaren, Canon Law: A Text and Commentary (1951), pgs. 931-932).

Vatican II Sect Teaching:

When the Vatican II sect was created by the Modernists, they sought to conform Christ to the world. Modernism is the polar opposite of Catholicism. By introducing false principles by which theology should be guided, they lead the way to acceptance of unnatural behavior. The "Constitution on the Church in the Modern World" (Gaudium et Spes) begins the moral decay:

Para. #54:  "The circumstances of the life of modern man have been so profoundly changed in their social and cultural aspects, that we can speak of a new age of human history. New ways are open, therefore, for the perfection and the further extension of culture. These ways have been prepared by the enormous growth of natural, human and social sciences, by technical progress, and advances in developing and organizing means whereby men can communicate with one another. Hence the culture of today possesses particular characteristics: sciences which are called exact greatly develop critical judgment; the more recent psychological studies more profoundly explain human activity; ..." (Emphasis mine). 

Para. #62: "In pastoral care, sufficient use must be made not only of theological principles, but also of the findings of the secular sciences, especially of psychology and sociology, so that the faithful may be brought to a more adequate and mature life of faith." (Emphasis mine). 

The pagan aspects of psychology and sociology were thereby introduced. Vatican II joins modern psychology in the heretical teaching of humanity's "intrinsic self-worth." In Gaudium et Spes, para. 24 states, "...if man is the only creature on earth God has wanted for its own sake, man can fully discover his true self only in a sincere giving of himself," as if people possesses such value in themselves that it would cause God to create them.  In the Catholic meaning, the self-worth or "dignity of man" cannot be considered as a characteristic in people's very nature that imposes respect for all choices, because this dignity depends on right will turned toward the Good and is therefore a relative and not an absolute value. 

The stage was set for a series of "declarations" that would weaken and collapse traditional morality in sexual matters. In 1975, the Modernist Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (sic) promulgated a Declaration on Certain Questions Concerning Sexual Ethics.  The declaration, approved by Montini (Paul VI), reverses the presumption of guilt on the part of those who commit sexual sins. Paragraph # 10 states: "It is true that in sins of the sexual order, in view of their kind and their causes, it more easily happens that free consent is not fully given; this is a fact which calls for caution in all judgment as to the subject's responsibility." (Emphasis mine). 

(N. B. In sins of serious matter, it is presumed that free consent of the will is present, unless the Confessor finds out otherwise. One would--logically and naturally--presume that those engaging in sodomical acts are not coerced or unaware of what they are doing. Here, the declaration adopts erroneous principles of modern psychology that people are "born" homosexuals with desires they "can't help" and act upon them with less than full consent of the will---Introibo). 

On October 1, 1986, the same Modernist Congregation, headed by Ratzinger at this time, released the Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic (sic) Church On the Pastoral Care of Homosexual Persons. This 'letter" (or "declaration") states in para. #7: "Homosexual activity is not a complementary union, able to transmit life; and so it thwarts the call to a life of that form of self-giving which the Gospel says is the essence of Christian living. This does not mean that homosexual persons are not often generous and giving of  themselves; but when they engage in homosexual activity they confirm within themselves a disordered sexual inclination which is essentially self-indulgent." Here, those who engage in unnatural vice are often "generous and giving" of themselves. Couldn't you say the same of all serious sinners, such as thieves and wife beaters? 

In paragraph #10, we are treated to this gem: "It is deplorable that homosexual persons have been and are the object of violent malice in speech or in action. Such treatment deserves condemnation from the Church's pastors wherever it occurs. It reveals a kind of disregard for others which endangers the most fundamental principles of a healthy society. The intrinsic dignity of each person must always be respected in word, in action and in law." While I don't advocate violence against anyone, the State has the right to imprison such persons; and what, exactly, constitutes "violent malice in speech"? 

I guess Pope St. Gregory the Great was guilty of "violent malice in speech" when he said, "Brimstone calls to mind the foul odors of the flesh, as Sacred Scripture itself confirms when it speaks of the rain of fire and brimstone poured by the Lord upon Sodom.  He had decided to punish in it the crimes of the flesh, and the very type of punishment emphasized the shame of that crime, since brimstone exhales stench and fire burns. It was, therefore, just that the sodomites, burning with perverse desires that originated from the foul odor of flesh, should perish at the same time by fire and brimstone so that through this just chastisement they might realize the evil perpetrated under the impulse of a perverse desire." (St. Gregory the Great, Commento morale a Giobbe, XIV, 23, vol. II, p. 371; Emphasis mine). 

Vatican II Sect: Exonerating Sodomites

The Nature and Scope of the Problem of Sexual Abuse of Minors by Catholic Priests and Deacons in the United States, commonly known as the John Jay Report, is a 2004 report by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, commissioned by the U.S. Conference of Catholic (sic) Bishops (sic). It can be read in full here: https://votf.org/johnjay/John_Jay_Causes_and_Context_Report.pdf

The group The Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests aka SNAP, had a stinging critique of the Report. Although I disagree with much of what SNAP publishes, they were on the mark with these four criticisms of the John Jay Report:

Here are four of the most crucial fallacies in the document:

--The crisis is and was unforeseeable, the report claims, because child molesters don’t have forked tongues or devil tails and can’t be easily detected. Fair enough. But the report essentially dodges the crucial question: Why don’t bishops quickly out and oust child molesting clerics the first time they sexually assault a child? (And why then, if predators can’t be spotted in advance, do bishops tout their alleged seminary “screening” processes as panaceas?)

--The crisis was long ago, the report claims, because the bishops say so. Never mind the fact that only a handful of five and ten year olds march down to the police station and promptly report their own victimization, so it’s dreadfully misleading and dangerous to assume clergy sex crimes have gone down in recent years.

--The crisis isn’t all that bad, the report suggests, because many of the kids who are or were violated had experienced puberty. Never mind the fact that child sex crimes, no matter at what age, are always illegal, immoral and hurtful. So the hair-splitting between pedophiles and ephebophiles (a distinction that seems to matter to few besides bishops) is, for the most part, at best irrelevant and at worst distracting.

--Most important, the crisis isn’t the bishops’ fault, the document implies. It was what the New York Times calls the “Blame Woodstock” defense. At best, this is naïve. At worst, it’s deceptive. There are at least three reasons why it may appear to some that abuse ‘peaked’ in the 60s and 70s. The first is that victims during those years are old, strong, smart, healthy and desperate enough to finally be able to report their horrific pain. The second is that bishops are much more willing to disclose clergy sex crimes that are beyond the reach of the criminal and civil justice system than more recent clergy sex crimes that could result in prosecution and litigation and embarrassment. And bishops are more willing to acknowledge child felonies committed under their predecessors than themselves. (See  snapnetwork.org/snap_statements/2011_statements/051811_4_fallacies_in_new_bishops_abuse_report_snap.htm). 

However, both the John Jay Report and SNAP fail to mention the "elephant in the room," namely, homosexuality in the clergy. A review of the report will show the large disproportionate number of male victims. Study after nationwide study has yielded estimates of male homosexuality that range between 1% and 3% (See Muir [1993] Homosexuals and the 10% fallacy. Wall Street J March 31). The proportion of lesbians in these studies is almost always lower, usually about half that of male sodomites. So, overall, perhaps 2% of adults regularly indulge in homosexuality. Yet they account for between 20% to 40% of all molestations of children.(Ibid). 

If 2% of the population is responsible for 20% to 40% of something as socially and personally horrific as child molestation, something must be desperately wrong with that 2%. Not every sodomite is a child molester. However, so many do molest children that the risk of a homosexual molesting a child is 10 to 20 times greater than that of a heterosexual. Also absent from the Report is the removal of the prohibition on men with same-sex attraction (SSA) from entering the seminaries after Vatican II, causing many of the seminaries to become little more than "pink palaces" for perverts. 

Now, Bergoglio goes so far as to state: "If they [gay priests] accept the Lord and have goodwill, who am I to judge them? They shouldn't be marginalized. The tendency [same-sex attraction] is not the problem... they're our brothers." (Emphasis mine). The enemies of the Church were successful in setting up the Vatican II sect and helping to "make gay OK." That is why it will never be mentioned in a bad light by the sect, or by the godless media.

The Ultimate Goal: Pedophilia as a "Civil Right"

The sodomite acceptance (and even promotion) in society was unthinkable even 25 years ago. We now have "transgender" perverts convincing parents to mutilate their children's bodies. The final step will be legalizing pedophilia. There can be no negative news of homosexuals harming children; pedophilia is not to be seen as a sodomite crime against children. The campaign is to slowly but surely have it seen as a positive expansion of so-called "gay rights."

In the U.S. and Canada, the North American Man-Boy Love Association marches proudly in many "gay pride parades" with the stated goal of removing the barriers to man-boy sex. Note the phrases they use are removal of “oppression towards pedophilia” and gaining the “liberation of pedophilia.” It is clear that those who advocate the legalization of sex between adults and children intend to argue that such conduct is a “civil right,” deserving of the same legal protections afforded to racial and ethnic minorities. The Vatican II sect is complicit in this goal, and covers up the obvious connection between homosexuality and molestation.

Here are the facts:

• Over 90% of child molesters are male
• 25-40% of molestations are same-sex, far in excess of the percentage of homosexuals
• 43% of sex between teachers and pupils is homosexual
• 50% of sex between foster parents and foster children is homosexual
• In a study of 21 "group home" sex scandals — 71% were homosexual
• Of those who commit incest: Homosexual parents — 18%; Heterosexual parents — 0.6%

(See Freund K, Watson RJ (1992) "The proportions of heterosexual and homosexual pedophiles among sex offenders against children: an exploratory study." Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 18:34-43). 

Even as I write this post, transgenders are breaking down the last rationale society holds for rejecting pedophilia, i.e., the child cannot consent. However, children who think they are members of the opposite sex are now being allowed by parents to dress, act, and even mutilate themselves with drugs and surgery to become "who they really are" because it's allegedly "in their best interests." So who needs consent? We make children eat healthy food and get vaccinated without consent, so if my child feels attracted to a man at 7 or 8 years old, it might be in his "best interest" to have a sexual relationship with that man. God help us. 

Conclusion

Please pray for my friend Peter, that God may heal him and lead him into the One True Church. You don't know him, but God does, and hears our prayers on his behalf. Pray for all the Victims of Vatican II who have been physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually harmed. It was difficult for me to write tis post. I keep thinking of Our Lord's words, "It would be better for them to be thrown into the sea with a millstone tied around their neck than to cause one of these little ones to stumble." (St. Luke 17:2).