Monday, December 26, 2022

The Gratitude Of The Woman

 

To My Readers: The last post of the year 2022 will be from my guest poster, Joanna From Poland. Thanks to Joanna and Lee helping me, this blog is able to continue with one well-written post each Monday. I hope all of you had a Holy Christmas, and may you all have the blessings of God upon you in 2023. Please feel free to comment as usual. If you have a specific question or comment for me, I will respond as always, but it may take a bit longer than usual for my reply this week.

God bless you all, my dear readers---Introibo

The Gratitude Of The Woman
By Joanna From Poland

As I am writing these words, we are on the eve of the last full week of Advent. Our minds and bodies have started to grow weary with penance while the post-Christian or rather anti-Christian world around us has been indulging in a full-blown celebration of the “holiday season” for weeks now. Stacks of Christmas decorations lay disorderly in our stores, having been thoroughly searched through by countless customers already, though the most frantic shopping days are probably yet to come. Ember Friday has been substituted by the so-called Black Friday where you go on an online hunt in pursuit of the best bargain. It certainly takes a lot of perseverance for Catholics today not to get swayed by the worldly idea that the “magic” of Christmastime lies in going on shopping sprees and humming “Christmas” tunes along the way.

As the bulk of Christmas preparations rest with the wife and mother, or the woman in general, it seems to me that it is also the ladies who must decide whether Christmas is celebrated in our homes according to the wishes of Our Lord and of His One True Church – and act accordingly. We simply owe it to Our Lord and with this post I would like to share with you some of the reasons that could inspire that gratitude towards God in us this coming Christmas.

There has been much talk of the so-called female liberation in the past decades. The Vatican II sect has been in the process of feminizing their false religion for years now and Bergoglio has certainly pushed things ahead when he officially allowed women to act as lectors and acolytes with his Motu (Ina)Proprio Spiritus Domini issued January 11, 2021. Obviously, the practice of having “altar girls” goofing around the table and female “Eucharistic ministers” has already been well-established in the Novus Ordo. All of this is naturally abominable to anyone who still retains even the remnants of Catholic sense, and does not mistake equality for equity.

One of the most prominent figures of the Novus Ordo who failed to grasp that distinction in terms was John Paul II. In his Letter to Women, issued in relation to the Fourth World Conference on Women, sponsored by the United Nations, and held in Beijing in 1995, having first expressed his deep appreciation to the UN for the organization of this “very significant event,” he states that “as far as personal rights [of women] are concerned, there is an urgent need to achieve real equality [emphasis in the original text] in every area," adding that this is “a matter of justice." 

(See: https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/letters/1995/documents/hf_jp-ii_let_29061995_women.html)

Just to give you a short overview of what that very significant event heartily endorsed by the then chief apostate in the Vatican aimed to accomplish, here’s an excerpt taken from one of the UN-run websites:

The 1995 Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing marked a significant turning point for the global agenda for gender equality. The Beijing Declaration and the Platform for Action, adopted unanimously by 189 countries, is an agenda for women’s empowerment and considered the key global policy document on gender equality.

A section of that declaration says the following with regards to the “Human Rights of Women”:

223. (…) the Fourth World Conference on Women reaffirms that reproductive rights rest on the recognition of the basic right of all couples and individuals to decide freely and responsibly the number, spacing and timing of their children and to have the information and means to do so, and the right to attain the highest standard of sexual and reproductive health. It also includes their right to make decisions concerning reproduction free of discrimination, coercion, and violence, as expressed in human rights documents.

Try squaring that with the true Magisterium of the Church expressed in the encyclical on marriage, divorce, and birth control “Casti Connubii” by Pope Pius XI (which, at the time of its release in 1931, was re-printed in full by… the New York Times! Times certainly have changed…).

As we are (hopefully) preparing ourselves spiritually for the joyous and thankful celebration of the Nativity of Our Lord, let us first consider the state of the world before the first coming of Christ, and – in particular – the position of the woman in the pre-Christian society.

Arguing that the restoration of the world through Christianity proves its divine origin, Fr. Stanislaw Bartynowski S.J. in his textbook on Catholic apologetics (1939 Imprimatur) gives an apt description of the world and society before Christ:

Errors with regards to the most basic philosophical and moral issues were dominant everywhere, except for the people of Israel. Only the Israelites worshipped the true God – all of the other nations venerated nature and prostrated before stones and trees, made by their own hands. The entire earth was a vast temple of idols, in which, according to Bossuet’s words: all was God, except for God Himself. Even the most civilized and mentally-developed nations were no less backward in terms of religion than the savage ones. People lost their sense of morality to such an extent that they would adore iniquity in public: each passion and every kind of cruelty had its guardian deity that was venerated by the practice of the corresponding iniquity; thus, pagan temples became places of utmost scandal. Whereas, real virtue, such as charity was regarded as a vice by Seneca or Plautus; honest labor was the object of scorn – according to Aristotle and Plato, an occupation unbecoming of a man since “everyone who has respect for himself” should lead an idle life, as Terence wrote.

As a result of such a revolution in concepts and degeneration of morals, the holiest of man’s affections disappeared – justice and honesty were unheard of and the dignity of man trampled upon. Thus, contempt for human nature was formed. For instance, the father as the master of life and death in his family, could either acknowledge a child as his own or reject it, nay, even kill it with impunity. Seneca regarded this as a just thing to do and, according to Quintilian, the killing of one’s own child was supposed to be a beautiful deed!... [Quintilian was a Roman educator or pedagogue, living in 35-100 A.D. – so much for the rights of children in pagan Rome] Woman was deprived of her honor and regarded as something lower than man. Thus, the wife was the first among her husband’s female slaves, whom he could dispose of at any moment. The family was abused amidst such relations, and the hearth and home shattered by polygamy.

The society became such as were its members: criminal and unhappy. The lust for living it up and the egoism of the mighty caused abject poverty of the poorer classes, which was conducive to all kinds of crime. Major part of the population found themselves in the most pitiful conditions of all, being deprived of their civil rights, nay, even, their human rights… Those were the unfortunate slaves, used for the hardest labor, treated like animals by their masters to be sold or killed on a whim. They could at any time be thrust into the amphitheater to be devoured by lions and tigers…  such spectacles would take a heavy toll of about thirty thousand victims each year!

Liberty in the state was known only by its name, the citizen had no freedom – he was regarded as nothing in the face of the god-state, that could at any moment demand the sacrifice of the citizen’s property, liberty, and life. State orders, though inhumane, were thought to be good and just. The tyranny of the mighty was a substitute for all law – as a consequence, all respect for authority vanished, and those in power could never be sure whether they would live or not… In a word, the law of the fist was the only norm of conduct.

Generally speaking: overabundance and the violation of all that is law at the top, with debasement and slavery of the lowest classes – such is the image of the pagan society before the coming of Christ.

In particular, people were so much accustomed to the corruption and bloody lawlessness which would outrage any honest man today, that neither the lawgivers, nor the philosophers and poets cared at all to raise the world from this moral abyss.

How different is this description of the world immersed in sin and blinded by paganism from the alleged glorious image of ancient civilizations peddled by the media today.

Such was the miserable state of humanity more than 2,000 years ago. Without becoming overly apocalyptic, we can safely assume that the modern world bears a striking resemblance to the one in which the Incarnate Word was to be made flesh and born of the Blessed Virgin Mary in the cold stable of Bethlehem. The general falling away from the Catholic Faith in the aftermath of Vatican II has led many to adopt the pagan ideas of old – if not in theory, then certainly in deed. Nature abhors a vacuum, and human nature is no exception to that rule. Most people who consider themselves educated and intelligent sincerely believe that it is imperative that we stop burning fossil fuels so as to “save the planet” but shrug their shoulders at the thought of innocent babies being murdered in their mothers’ wombs at an unprecedented rate.

If human dignity as such was utterly destroyed in the pre-Christian era, the position of the woman was particularly pitiful. Fr. Jozef Stanislaw Adamski thus outlines the lot of the weaker sex in the pagan world in his book The Dignity and Mission of the Christian Woman (1922):

The originally beautiful and noble creature of God – the woman – was basically devastated. God has, since the dawn of time, clearly defined the position and the mission of women. He provided the first couple in Paradise with mutual unity and love. The woman was no stranger to the man, much less was she lower than him or insignificant. (…) Therefore, the very means of creating her should inspire in her husband the love for her, should make him sacrifice himself for her, and respect her. God set His goal for the woman clearly: she was to be the man’s helper, being similar to him, having the same nature and value as he has – the alike helper (adjutorium simile). God demanded of him limitless sacrifice for her: “wherefore a man shall leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife” (Gen. 2: 24). Such was the original work of God: kind, gentle, harmonious, fertile, and powerful.

However, man destroyed this wondrous work, and put his own monstrosity in its place. In the place of union and love, he introduced tyranny – the woman was supposed to cater to his base lust like a slave. Having humiliated the woman, man started to despise her; deprived her of the due honor, denied the position assigned to her by God, devised laws against her – wicked and cruel ones – which deprived the woman of the dignity of a human being which left her to fall prey to all kinds of injustice. The man, instead of putting his own strength and the energy of his sacrifice at the service of her weakness, took advantage of her feebleness in order to subjugate her completely and destroy her. God called her the mother of the living, gave her the right to bear and educate her children, but the man took away even this most crucial right from her! In the most enlightened Rome in the full bloom of civilization under the emperor Augustus only the free women were defended from violence by the law – [a man] was free to do with his female slaves whatever he pleased. The woman was denied her civic laws; she was held in custody her entire life. As a daughter, she was her father’s possession who could kill her or sell her and offer her hand in marriage without her consent. The woman was underage her entire life – from her father’s slavery she was passed under the hand (sub manum) of her husband as his daughter (filiae loco), for her husband to regard her as an object. According to the Lex Voconia [the Roman law of inheritance passed in 169 B.C.], she was denied her father’s inheritance even if she was a single child. In relation to her husband, the woman was a servant, a slave, allocated to the lowest works. The role of the slave was so eagerly accepted by the disgraced woman that, after having served her entire life, she would commit suicide on her husband’s grave as it was the case in India or among the Gaul tribes, not because she wanted to be happy in the life to come (paganism did not regard women as being worthy of happiness), not because she wished to accompany her husband – but in order to serve him still in the afterlife!

Not very different was the fate of the woman among the Slavonic peoples, in Poland. In order to understand the sad lot of the woman, suffice to say that polygamy was a common practice. Once introduced into the house and handed over under the authority of her husband, the woman awaited a most painful fate. Only yesterday [that is, before she was married] was she so respected that if any man should come into contact with her, it was regarded as her being defiled. She was believed to be a creature so pure and exalted that she would be called a diva, a kind of a goddess who could at any moment take the honorific place of a priestess and a seer in the pagan temple of ancient Slavs – now she is called names such as the one who does not know, cast into the cabin of the savage master of her life and death. The husband, dissatisfied with a daughter being born, would (many times before the mother’s eyes) grab an ax and kill the baby – woe to the mother if she dared weep or complain! (…) Such is the fate [of the woman] today in places where the rays of the Gospel have not reached yet or the warmth of which cannot be felt any longer.

Indeed, the paragraphs quoted above express to some degree the present condition of the woman in today’s world which had known Christ and His One True Church yet rejected Him, and fell once again into the pits of sin. Isn’t the so-called “liberated” woman a slave to her own wicked passions when she is willing to walk the streets with lewd banners in support of her “right” to kill her own unborn baby? Isn’t she complacent with her own enslavement when, working all week as a clerk in the supermarket, grumbles at the prospect of having a free Sunday due to the state legislation on restricting public commerce on that day?

Let us now consider, Fr. Adamski continues, how Our Savior raises the woman up from her debasement and ennobles her. (…) Christ Our Lord elevates the woman in Holy maternity. Oh, how wondrous, how lovely is the scene that begins the work of our redemption! The angel – sent to the woman - descends from heaven; he comes to arrange with her the greatest work of God destined to regenerate and save the human race. He solemnly declares that she is full of grace; at her feet homage is paid; heaven and earth awaits her consent for the work in which she is to play the most crucial part. What an amazing and most marvelous turn of events this is! What glory; what a wonderful restoration of the woman! At once, the woman who groaned under the weight of most shameful slavery, stands at the unparalleled heights, at the highest throne of heaven right next to God-Man. “The queen stood on thy right hand, in gilded clothing; surrounded with variety” (Ps. 44:10).

Our Savior raises the woman up illuminating her with innocence and grace. The Virgin Mother, the Mother of God inaugurated the liberation and elevation of the woman with unsurpassed charm and light. Still, in order to lift the woman up something more was needed since the long ages of pain and ruin had deprived her of the freshness of her original innocence and the strength of her native virtue. Lo! At Christ’s feet there kneels a woman, representing the degradation of the female, shedding profuse tears of contrition at the feet of God-Man, Who, before the spectators’ eyes, restores her good name, and, to some degree, illuminates her with the original innocence. Jesus not only says to her: “thy sins are forgiven thee” but also praises her fervent faith, extols her magnanimous charity, and the service of her boundless sacrifice. The purified and sanctified woman is led by the Holy Savior to the heights of heroism. During the horrifying passion of Christ, when His flock was scattered, when men – the Apostles, except for St. John – desert Jesus, the woman takes their place at Calvary, fearlessly facing the rage of the murderers of God and gathers in a way the last drops of His Blood!

(…)

Our Savior dignifies the woman with the honors of the hearth and home. Those rays of God in which Christ clothed the woman who became His spouse in the religious life, are shining also beyond the cloister, and are spread throughout the entire world. From that time on the mother of the family has occupied a prominent and wide place in the home, guaranteed her by the Christian right of sacramental marriage. The woman is a spouse inseparably joined with her husband. Here does she reign – and if the Apostle reminds her of her duty to be obedient to her husband (Col 3:18), then it is the obedience full of glory which does not violate any of her rights. Now, she is the one who educates her children who acknowledge in her the most tender and sacred authority and prestige.

Our Savior consecrates and dedicates the woman to great works in the society. (…) From the early centuries of Christianity, where events of great importance have been taking place, there have been found a Christian woman. Constantine is aided by [his mother] Helena; Theodosius  had [his daughter] Eudoxia and [sister] Pulcheria; Clotilde [a Catholic princess who remained Catholic despite the Arianism of her court] converts Clovis [the first king of the Franks whose baptism in 496 unified the Frankish tribes; he is regarded by the French as the founder of France]; Blanche transforms her son into St. Louis; Doubravka [a Bohemian princess] brings the light of the Faith into Poland [with her husband, Mieszko I, being baptized in 966 thus consolidating the once-pagan tribes and giving rise to the first independent and Christian Polish state, the Duchy of Poland], and Hedwig [or Jadwiga of Poland, the first woman to be crowned as monarch of the Kingdom of Poland in 1384] brings the Faith into Lithuania. On the throne as well as on the lowest steps of the social ladder, the woman, lifted up by Christ, becomes a heroic creature, eager for the highest sacrifice, a fearless aide, whether she is called “the good duchess” Elizabeth of Hungary or Genevieve, the humble Parisian shepherdess, or the Maid of Orleans, Joan, sent by God to free France (…). Fr. Ventura rightly states that “popes, apostolic men, founders of religious congregations, saintly priests and lay people, even kings who were not saints, would have accomplished nothing sacred, great, beautiful, useful in the interest of the faith or morals, nay, even the material prosperity of peoples without the cooperation in this or that way of a Catholic woman: if that woman – for her part - was thoroughly Catholic and – apart from her lofty virtues - she would have a profound and extensive knowledge of religion; if she would shine with impeccability”. (…)

May the women craving for unhealthy emancipation remember just what they owe to Christianity, without which the slavery and shame of old awaits them!...

Conclusion

Although people like Karol Wojtyla may have envisaged that the great process of women’s liberation (…) is still unfinished, true Catholics surely know better than that. Ladies, we’ve already been liberated! Let us give thanks this Christmas to the One who truly liberated us, male and female alike, having broken the chains of our pagan captivity, snatching us with His own Precious Blood from the shadow of death, and having illumined the entire world with the light of the True Catholic Faith which we must preserve and spread according to our abilities in these trying times of near universal apostasy. May our gratitude to Jesus Christ, our greatest Heavenly Benefactor be ever renewed in our hearts, especially as we kneel in our churches, our chapels, and our homes before the crib of Our Redeemer in the midst of the world which “knew him not.”  Merry Christmas!

28 comments:

  1. Thanks Joanna for another great writing.All the best for 2023.God bless and our Lady watch over you.Steven

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you, Steven!
    May God bless You ad Yours abundantly in 2023,
    Joanna S.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hello Introibo or Joanna or Lee:

    1. Do you know if the SSPV in upstate New York is okay? I think that a lot of the storm is in Buffalo, but the SSPV I believe does have locations and people outside of Long Island.

    2. I understand that some traditionalists(Bishop Sanborn, Bishop Dolan(deceased), and Father Cekada(deceased)) thought that it was fine for Terri Schiavo to be taken off of her feeding tube(this was in the mid-2000s). Others, SSPV, possibly CMRI, were of the opinion that her feeding tube should have been kept in.
    Do you know if these groups still have the same opinions today, and does it affect who they will give sacraments to?

    Thank you. Anonymous

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon3:30
      1. The SSPV is fine anywhere you go.

      2. The SSPV and CMRI hold the correct opinion and still do. I don't know about Bp. Sanborn. I don't remember him taking a position, but I could be wrong. It is not an "issue" with the SSPV or CMRI, unless you declare openly that ORDINARY means to preserve life should not be maintained. That is pro-euthanasia and a priest would be right to withhold Communion from a public sinner causing scandal.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  4. Hello Introibo:

    1. I meant to ask about the big storm in Buffalo. Are the SSPV members in upstate New York okay in the storm?

    2. I know about the positions of SSPV on the Terri Schiavo case. If somebody AGREES with the SSPV position on the case, what should that person do about approaching a different group for the sacraments? Not ask about the Schiavo case? If the group has the wrong position on the Schiavo case, should that group be avoided for the sacraments? Thank you. Anonymous

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon8:09
      1. I have not heard of anything bad (Deo gratias!). However, I'm not privy to everything that goes on. I'm in NYC.

      2. You will never be asked about Terri Schiavo, so it's a moot point. The problem lies, not really in the Catholic principles, but how they were applied. Hence, you need not avoid anyone. Only if (God forbid) a priest or bishop said that ordinary means need not be given to someone serious ill or dying would they be condoning murder. I would then avoid them just as if they said abortion is acceptable.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  5. Hello Introibo and Joanna from Brisbane,Australia.

    All the best for 2023.Keep up the fine writings.

    Bishop Sanborn is sending down another priest to help with our growing missions here and over in New Zealand.We hope to in the near future to have some of the sisters of Saint Thomas Aquinas start a school here.God bless you

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon4:14
      Wonderful news! Praying that 2023 will be a great year for you all!

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  6. Hello I have a question for introibo or anyone else. If a baptized Catholic marries a non baptized person with approval from the novus ordo bishop, would that be considered valid even though he is not a Catholic bishop? What is your opinion? Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Patrick,
      In my opinion, a "Catholic" (I'm assuming V2 sect) marries a non-V2 sect member, it would be valid as they are not bound to the canonical form and the approval of the "bishop" makes no difference. That's my opinion, nothing more.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  7. Good post Joanna ! The modern world is polluted by feminism and its errors like the "right to abortion", contraception, gender equality. And the V2 sect, like the Great Prostitute of the Apocalypse, fornicates with the powers of this world and approves of its false doctrines. We have to thank God for opening our eyes to this false church that came out from hell !

    Happy New Year 2023, Introibo and all readers !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Simon,
      Yes, Joanna has written another fantastic post!

      Happy New Year, my friend!

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. Thank you, Simon and Introibo!

      The Vatican II sect is on its path for even more feminism and heresy in 2023. Deo Gratias indeed we're no longer part of it!

      God Bless You,
      Joanna S.

      Delete
    3. Joanna, there will probably be women priests and bishops in the V2 sect, as there is in Anglicans. This is the logical consequence of the false doctrine of gender equality, as we see in civil society.

      Delete
    4. I agee with you, Simon. Novus Ordo women ordination is probably just a matter of time. People are so accustomed to seeing females taking the lead in Novus Ordo parishes that the only logical step for that false religion is to have women preside at the novus bogus table, and have it legalized in their false magisterium. I hope at least some fence-sitting people will flee the V2 sect then!

      God Bless,
      Joanna S.

      Delete
  8. Joanna,

    Wonderful, enlightening post! Thank you. God bless you.

    -Seeking Truth

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seeking Truth,

      thank you so much, my friend!

      God Bless You,
      Joanna S.

      Delete
  9. Introibo

    I have a question for you please.

    Which pre-vatican two books on moral,pastoral,dogmatic,mystical and ascetical theology do you recommend?

    A recent convert to the Traditional Faith(was Anglican) who is looking at building up a good library.I have thrown in the garbage all my Novus Ordo books.

    Thank you and God bless

    Anthony

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anthony,
      Books I recommend for someone starting out:

      Moral Theology: Theologian Jone "Moral Theology"

      Dogmatic Theology: Theologian Ott "Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma"

      Pastoral Theology: Theologian Schulze "Manual of Pastoral Theology"

      Mystical Theology: Theologian Tanquerey "The Spiritual Life"

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. Thank you Introibo

      I have those books.Can you suggest anymore.

      What carmelite writings do you suggest?

      God bless
      Anthony

      Delete
    3. Anthony,
      For more advanced study

      Dogmatic theology: Theologian Van Noort (3 vol), theologian Pohle (12 vol)

      Moral Theology: Theologian Prummer (1 vol), theologian Slater (2 vol)

      Pastoral Theology: Theologian Davis (4 vol)

      Mystical Theology: theologian Garrigou Lagrange "Three Ages of the Interior Life" (2 vol).

      Carmelite writings: Anything by St. John of the Cross

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  10. A blessed and grace-filled new year to you introibo my friend and to all readers.I made the comment last week about how I was misled by a woman at work.Thank you for praying for me.Thanks be to God she has resigned(we think she has been told to go for being a toxic manager)More info about her has been told to me.A child from her previous marriage she has just sent back to India with her brother so it can be brought up by the grandparents.She now has the time to play around with her new boyfriend.What mom would do that to their own child.I have not had much experence with dating so you can imagine how hurt I am.This is so typical of Novus Ordo women.As I said she had a rosary hanging in her automobile and a small crucifix next to her computer.Even at Traditional chapels I find many young women outside so worldly.To try and find a decent woman to date and marry is like finding a needle in a hay barn.It has been a wake up call.

    God bless
    Dave

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dave,
      Be glad you're out. The pain will ease with time, don't rush into anything. Everything happens in God's time, not ours. It is hard to find decent marriage partners these days (it's not just the ladies who are worldly). Nevertheless, I refused to settle and married in my 40s. My wife was well worth the wait!!

      Continuing to pray for you.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  11. Don't you think that is sick introibo a woman getting her parents to bring up her only child so she can play around with another man in ease.What evil times we are in.Don't despair Dave.God will bring someone decent in his time.Also praying for you.

    Thomas
    Europe

    ReplyDelete
  12. Joanna S.,
    This is a very important blog post. Unfortunately I have met many nice and kind women in my life who have turned out to be leftist materialists, hedonists and practical atheists. Of course, young men in Poland are no better, although statistically at least declaratively they are more conservative and right-wing - which does not mean Catholic....

    In this battle for "women's rights" in 2020, it has become clear who is who. I, unfortunately, also found out who my friends from school are.... Discussions with them were pointless. There were no reasoned arguments, purely emotional shouting and name-calling. All these brawls are the dialogue that the left demands? Where is their tolerance? Where is their pluralism? Where is their subjectivism and relativism? It has suddenly disappeared. There is the "one true" dogma of the left: "Abortion is good if the woman so wishes". All those who disagree deserve anathema and thunders of condemnation. As Bishop Sanborn once put it: 'No one is more dogmatic, more condemning, more intolerant than a leftist. The leftists make the Inquisition look like an ecumenical service'.

    I have a question for you: according to you, every time a Catholic truth is attacked in company, am I obliged to stand up for it even if I have the moral certainty that it will amount to nothing? How do you do?
    What do you think of the book 'One Hundred Years of Modernism. Sources of the Second Vatican Council" by Fr. Dominique Bourmaud SSPX? Recently Fr. Szymon Bańka SSPX on his famous youtube channel recommended it.


    May the Saints Three Kings pray for you!
    God Bless,
    Paweł

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Paweł,

      I'm very sorry for the long delay in replying to your question.

      I've recently come across a short article in one of the mainstream newspapers in Poland which said that nearly 70% of Polish women did not want to have children AT ALL, I believe it was some sort of a public opinion poll. Words fail me.

      Regarding your first question, here's what theologian Connell writes ("Outlines of moral theology", 1953) on the subject of the profession of Faith:

      "As an affirmative precept the obligation to profess the true faith binds a person (by God's law) as often as silence or ambiguity or his manner of acting would suggest an implicit denial of the faith, contempt of religion, an insult to God or scandal to one's neighbor. Thus, if a Catholic is present at a gathering in which the Catholic religion is being derided, he should ordinarily profess his faith and make some manner of protest. However, a person is not ALWAYS [emphasis in the original] bound to profess his faith, since there are times when silence, or even an ambiguous manner of acting would not involve any of the consequences just enumerated. In fact, at times a Catholic could perform an action which IN ITSELF [emphasis in the original] is lawful, even though forbidden by Church law, with the realization that others will thus conclude that he is not a Catholic. For example, in time of persecution a Catholic could eat meat on Friday if otherwise he might be the object of suspicion. Again, a young person who enters the Church without the knowledge of his parents could stay away from Mass on Sundays when it would lead them to judge that he had become a Catholic and to punish him severely in consequence. It should be noted, however, that to abstain from professing the faith is not the same as denying the faith or professing a false religion, for such things are intrinsically evil. Thus, the young person in question would never be allowed to take active part in a false religion, however grave the inconveniences might be that the parents would inflict. Ordinarily ambiguities are to be avoided, and a Catholic must be willing to declare himself such. This is particularly true of a public personage. It is well to remember, however, that our American law does not require a statement of one's religious affiliation as a qualification for office - e.g., schoolteacher. hence, if a person applying for such a job were asked his religion, he could refuse to answer."

      Now, our situation today is different with regards to declaring oneself a Catholic inasmuch as the "Catholic" label has been hijacked by the false Novus Ordo religion, so I believe it is wise to declare oneself a traditional Catholic, a Traditionalist (as Introibo does), or make it clear in some way that one does not belong to the post-Vatican II religion.

      Delete
    2. cont.
      I've been working for two weeks now in a place where I'm surrounded by many "modern" women, who take the Lord's name in vain, dress like hobos, are emotionally unstable, leftists, feminists, vegans, and the like. Not all of them, for sure. To make matters worse, I've been so engrossed in my new duties that I didn't realize I had been cheated by the all-women HR department.
      Personally, I'm willing to talk to anyone who's of good will and asks for advice or opinion but when I see a hardcore leftist, I don't waste my energy on trying to reason with him (or her). If we go by the teaching of pre-Vatican II approved theologians, such as Fr. Connell's, we'll be fine.

      Regarding your second question:
      I'd stay away from anything published by the SSPX clergy. There's so many great, pre-Vatican II books with all the necessary Church approbations, and so much stuff is being published by good sedevacantist clergy. I don't trust the SSPX clergy at all, especially after my brief exchange of e-mails with one of their priests in Poland, where he declared that they have their own theologians (sic!). The SSPX today are a bunch of hypocrites, dressed in old vestments, and many of them mere laymen (invalidly ordained Novus Ordo presbyters, which is true esp. in our own country).

      God Bless You,
      Joanna S.

      Delete