Monday, January 13, 2025

The Four Temperaments---Choleric (Part I)

 

To My Readers: I have received several requests for posts on the subject of The Four Temperaments. This week's post is the sixth installment to this most important and interesting topic. I will follow-up with other posts so that by sometime in 2025, I will have concluded the series, and hopefully do some justice to presenting the Four Temperaments. 

I want to acknowledge that I take no credit for the posts on this topic. My primary sources will be from theologian Schagemann and his work entitled Manual of Self-Knowledge and Christian Perfection (1913).  Also, the work of theologian Hock The Four Temperaments (1934) will be used throughout this series of posts, with various other sources. I take absolutely no credit whatsoever for the content of this post (or the ones on this topic to follow). All I did was condense the material of these theologians into a terse post that hopefully will be advantageous for  those looking for information, but without time to read an entire book or two from the pre-Vatican II era on the subject.

God bless you all, my dear readers---Introibo

The Characteristics of the Choleric Temperament
The choleric person is quickly and vehemently excited by any and every influence. Immediately the reaction sets in and the impression remains a long time. The choleric man is a man of enthusiasm; he is not satisfied with the ordinary, but aspires after great and lofty things. He craves for great success in temporal affairs; he seeks large fortunes, a vast business, an elegant home, a distinguished reputation or a predominant position. He aspires to the highest also in matters spiritual; he is swayed with a consuming fire for holiness; he is filled with a yearning desire to make great sacrifices for God and his neighbor, to lead many souls to heaven.

The natural virtue of the choleric is ambition; his desire to excel and succeed despises the little and vulgar, and aspires to the noble and heroic. In his aspiration for great things the choleric is supported by:

1. A keen intellect. The choleric person is not always, but usually endowed with considerable intelligence. He is a man of reason while his imagination and his emotions are poor and stunted. It is said that Julius Caesar was able to dictate different letters to several secretaries at the same time without losing the line of thought for each dictation.

2. A strong will. He is not frightened by difficulties, but in case of obstacles shows his energy so much the more and perseveres also under great difficulties until he has reached his goal. Pusillanimity or despondency the choleric does not know. Hamilcar of Carthage in North Africa took his son Hannibal to the altar of their god and made him swear eternal hatred for Rome, their implacable enemy. Later, Hannibal assembled a complete army and elephants and led them through Spain, over the Pyrenees, through Southern France and over the Alps into Italy, a feat never equaled before or after, and came very close to conquering and destroying Rome.

3. Strong passions. The choleric is very passionate. Whenever the choleric is bent upon carrying out his plans or finds opposition, he is filled with passionate excitement. All dictators, old and new, are proof of this statement.

4. An often times subconscious impulse to dominate others and make them subservient. The choleric is made to rule. He feels happy when he is in a position to command, to draw others to him, and to organize large groups. A very great impediment for the choleric in his yearning for great things is his imprudent haste. The choleric is immediately and totally absorbed by the aim he has in mind and rushes for his goal with great haste and impetuosity; he considers but too little whether he can really reach his goal.

A high Nazi official told a former chum, (later a priest): "We cannot back out; we have gone too
far."

He sees only one road, the one he in his impetuosity has taken without sufficient consideration, and he does not notice that by another road he could reach his goal more easily. If great obstacles meet him he, because of his pride, can hardly make up his mind to turn back, but instead he continues with great obstinacy on the original course. He dashes his head against the wall rather than take notice of the door which is right near and wide open. By this imprudence the choleric wastes a great deal of his energy which could be used to better advantage, and he disgusts his friends, so that finally he stands almost alone and is disliked by most people. He deprives himself of his best successes, even though he will not admit that he himself is the main cause of his failures. He shows the same imprudence in selecting the means for the pursuit of perfection, so that in spite of great efforts he does not acquire it. The choleric can safeguard himself from this danger only by willing and humble submission to a spiritual director.
The Dark Side of the Choleric Temperament
Pride which shows itself in the following instances:

a) The choleric is full of himself. He has a great opinion of his good qualities and his successful work and considers himself as something extraordinary and as one called upon to perform great feats. He considers even his very defects as being justified, nay, as something great and worthy of praise; for instance, his pride, his obstinacy, his anger. The Italian dictator Mussolini had himself called 'II Duce,' the Leader. Adolf Hitler followed his example by assuming the title: 'Der Fuehrer,' The Leader.

b) The choleric is very stubborn and opinionated. He thinks he is always right, wants to have the last word, tolerates no contradiction, and is never willing to give in. The Russian dictator Stalin brooked no opposition. A friend of his, during a drinking bout, voiced his disagreement with Stalin's opinion. Fearing for his safety some of his friends approached Stalin the next day to excuse their friend on the ground of having been drunk. Stalin coolly told them that their intervention came too late.

c) The choleric has a great deal of self-confidence. He relies too much upon his own knowledge and ability. He refuses the help of others and prefers to work alone, partly because he does not like to ask for help, partly because he believes that he is himself more capable than others and is sure to succeed without the help of others. Hitler relied on his 'hunches' in his war against Russia despite the advice of his generals, convinced that he knew better. He lost the war and everything. It is not easy to convince the choleric that he is in need of God's help even in little things. Therefore he dislikes to ask God's help and prefers to combat even strong temptations by his own strength. Because of this self-confidence in spiritual life the choleric often falls into many and grievous sins. This trait is one of the main reasons why so many cholerics do not acquire sanctityin spite of great efforts. They are infected to a great extent with the pride of Lucifer. They act as if perfection and Heaven were not in the first place due to grace but to their own efforts.

d) The choleric despises his fellow man. To his mind others are ignorant, weak, unskilled, slow, at least when compared with himself. He shows his contempt of his neighbor by despising, mocking, making belittling remarks about others and by his proud behavior toward those around him, especially toward his subjects. A Russian general, asked what he would do if his soldiers came to a mine field, responded that he would order a company of soldiers across it. The fact that he would sacrifice the lives of these soldiers meant nothing to him. (General Eisenhower).

e) The choleric is domineering and inordinately ambitious. He wants to hold the first place, to be admired by others, to subject others to himself. He belittles, combats, even persecutes by unfair means those who dare to oppose his ambition. Julius Caesar said that he would rather be the first in the smallest Alpine village than the second in Rome. Alexander the Great, considered one of the greatest generals of all time, was found by a friend of his one clear night looking at the stars and weeping. Asked why he wept he said: "See those thousands of stars in the sky to be conquered, and I cannot even conquer this world of ours."

f) The choleric feels deeply hurt when he is humiliated or put to shame. Even the recollection of his sins fills him with great displeasure because these sins give him a lower opinion of himself. In his disgust over his sins he may even defy God Himself.

2. Anger. The choleric is vehemently excited by contradiction, resistance, and personal offenses. This excitement manifests itself in harsh words which may seem very decent and polite as far as phrasing is concerned, but hurt to the core by the tone in which they are spoken. Nobody can hurt his fellow man with a few words more bitterly than a choleric person. Things are made even worse by the fact that the choleric in his angry impetuosity makes false and exaggerated reproaches, and may go so far in his passion, as to misconstrue the intentions and to pervert the words of those who irritated him, thus, blaming with the sharpest of expressions, faults which in reality were not committed at all. By such injustice, which the choleric inflicts in his anger upon his neighbor he can offend and alienate even his best friends.

The choleric may even indulge in furious outbursts of anger. His anger easily degenerates into hatred. Grievous offenses he cannot forget. In his anger and pride he permits himself to be drawn to actions which he knows will be very detrimental to himself and to others; for instance, ruin of his health, his work, his fortune, loss of his position, and complete rupture with intimate friends. By reason of his pride and anger he may totally ignore and cast aside the very plans for the realization of which he has worked for years. P. Schram says: "The choleric prefers to die rather than to humble himself."

3. Deceit, disguise and hypocrisy. As noble and magnanimous as the choleric is by nature, the tendency to pride and self-will may lead him to the lowest of vices, deceit and hypocrisy. He practices deceit, because he is in no way willing to concede that he succumbed to a weakness and suffered a defeat. He uses hypocrisy, deception, and even outright lies, if he realizes that he cannot carry out his plans by force. For the true Communist everything that will help his cause is right and just: he makes and breaks treaties and promises; robbery and lies and murder are considered justified if done for the Party and the Cause, without consideration of the cost in human suffering.

4. Lack of sympathy. The choleric, as said above, is a man of reason. He has two heads but no heart.

Wars, torture, concentration camps, the death of millions of people meant nothing to modern dictators like Lenin, Hitler, Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, and their like. This lack of human sentiment and sympathy is, in a way, of great advantage to him. He does not find it hard to be deprived of sensible consolations in prayer and to remain a long time in spiritual aridity. Effeminate, sentimental dispositions are repugnant to him; he hates the caresses and sentimentality which arise between intimate friends. False sympathy cannot influence him to neglect his duties or abandon his principles. On the other hand, this lack of sympathy has its great disadvantages. The choleric can be extremely hard, heartless, even cruel in regard to the sufferings of others. He can cold-bloodedly trample upon the welfare of others, if he cannot otherwise reach his goal. Choleric superiors should examine their conscience daily, to discover
whether they have not shown a lack of sympathy toward their subjects, especially if these are sickly, less talented, fatigued, or elderly.

Conclusion
This concludes the first part of understanding the choleric temperament according to the theologians.
 
The next installment will discuss the "bright side" of the choleric, and how those with such temperament should self-train for spiritual advancement. 

32 comments:

  1. Your blog on this temperament reminds me of politicians.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon7:15
      I laughed when I read your comment because it immediately struck me that you are correct! LOL!

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  2. Introibo: Happy New Year. Likely, the choleric termperament describes me, in some measure. Two things: Have you ever looked up the term and are you familiar with "Sigma male"? I take it as a rather recent term, but on a personal level, everything about that temperament--professionally, interpersonally, socially, describes me perfectly. It was rather unsettling when I first learned of it some weeks ago; it was an "aha" moment.
    Secondly, how is your friend that you wrote of sometime ago? Do you stay in touch with him? He was the man who had the unfortunate experience with the cleric. I think you mentioned he lives by the beach. Stay in touch with him; he needs your friendship.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dave,
      Happy New Year, my friend! I am not at all familiar with the term "Sigma male." I'll be sure to look it up--you have me interested!

      As to my friend "Peter" (not his real name) from my post
      https://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2022/04/covering-up-obvious.html:

      He is still a broken man, and I don't know if he will ever be 100% or even close to it. I pray for him and we keep in touch. I went to visit him a few months ago. It was heartbreaking. He has gotten major depressive episodes. Even with meds, he doesn't get much relief. He spends his days alone. He sleeps an average of 18 hours a day and has food delivered. The other six hours he prays.

      I brought him some Holy Water and a blessed medal of St. Dymphna (patron saint of those who suffer from mental disorders). I wasn't sure how he would take it, and to my happy surprise, he blessed himself with the holy water, kissed the medal and said he would pray to her every day! He even did research about her on his laptop which he told me about in a subsequent email.

      I there for him if he needs me--and he thanked me for it. I was the only visitor he had in over a year. His siblings and nephews/nieces have all written him off. His only close friends died in 9/11.

      I pray for him and hope that St. Dymphna can help to restore the life a perverted cleric took from him. The V2 sect is keeping the class action suit tied up in court. Nice to know where the sect member's money goes.

      Please pray for him.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. When I read your site, for some reason, I always think of Pete. I feel very deeply for that man. I can only imagine the horror that he lives through daily; a living "Hell" if there ever were one.

      Delete
    3. Dave,
      Thank you for thinking of him. By thinking of him and praying for him, you're helping him. He needs it.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  3. The 4 temperaments are very interesting to study. They help a person understand oneself better, as well as help one to understand others better. There are other determining factors on why Person A gets along better with Person B and not with Person C or D; or why this male is attracted more to this female and not that female in terms of a relationship. Some personalities just blend perfectly with each other and others are very toxic, like oil and water. In addition to the temperaments, certain birth orders gel a lot better in a relationship than other ones – e.g. the first born and last born pairing vs. two people from the same birth order. There are exceptions to this, but for the most part, they are usually pretty spot on. There are other reasons why certain people get along better with “these people” but not “those people” too. There are physical attractions that differ too (e.g. this man is attracted more to blondes over brunettes; whereas this other man prefers brunettes.)

    The 4 temperaments are actually mentioned by Ven. Mary of Agreda in “The Mystical City of God” as it relates to The Blessed Virgin Mary. Since she was perfectly created by the 3 Divine Persons of The Blessed Trinity, the 4 temperaments were exact in proportion and measure in her and never did one ever predominate over the others. As Ven. Mary of Agreda states:

    “In the formation of the body of the most holy Mary the wisdom and power of the Almighty proceeded so cautiously that the quantities of the four natural elements of the human body, the sanguine, melancholic, phlegmatic and choleric, were compounded in exact proportion and measure; in order that by this most perfect proportion in its mixture and composition it might assist the operations of that holy Soul with which it was to be endowed and animated. This wonderfully composed temperament was afterwards the source and the cause, which in its own way made possible the serenity and peace that reigned in the powers and faculties of the Queen of heaven during her life. Never did any of these elements oppose or contradict nor seek to predominate over the others, but each one of them supplemented and served the others, continuing in this well ordered fabric without corruption or decay.”

    -TradWarrior

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TradWarrior,
      Great insights as always, my friend! Than you for commenting.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. Maybe someone knows better but I saw this Fatima Conference and the first 15 minutes there is focus on condemnation of Mary of Agreda.
      https://youtu.be/gU2cx3uS8pE?si=_-liSFzL7is6ibOD

      I know semi trads who are obsessed with her and I think stick in their R&R position because of it...

      I think some things she writes go against Scripture like the part that Jesus was not fully naked on Cross. I'd like to think that too but...

      Traditional in Action site wrote in part this below, that many popes said free of error. I would really like to know the truth on this matter. Thank you!

      In his paper on Private Judgment, Timothy Duff responds to the skeptical priest by saying:

      “You will there find that Very Rev. Peter Mary Rookey, OSM, Consultor General of the Servites, personally researched in 1957 the decisions of five Popes regarding the books utilizing the original manuscript The Cause for the Beatification of the Ven. Mary of Jesus of Ágreda, a Latin manuscript which is to this day in the archives of the Congregation of Rites. This portfolio of original, signed Magisterial documents proves the Mystical City of God is approved by the Holy See as containing nothing contrary to Faith and Morals, and hence may be kept and read by all the faithful."

      You will also find there that Benedict XIV, contrary to what you state above, on May 7, 1757, promulgated the following decree:

      “It follows the Venerable Servant of God, Sister Mary of Jesus of Ágreda, wrote in the Spanish language the work which is treated in eight volumes and distributed under the title The Mystical City of God.” I could send you a pdf file of the original Latin document if you wish.”

      Delete
  4. Introibo,

    Sorry, this is off-topic though I need to call upon your encyclopedic knowledge.

    The St. Michael Prayer: not the short, not the very long (i.e. exorcism with + incantations, clerics only), not the abridged 1902 Rituale Romanum version; rather the original 1888, is it suppressed?

    Fr. Cekada wrote a very good tract on the Leonine Prayers (in his research showing that they fruited their intentions, both for Vatican City State and also for the Russian Church, they were never Fatima orientated), however he argues that the truncated 1902 prayer represents a suppression of the expurgated content; and yet I have a 1910 Raccolta with full approbation which includes the entire original (long) prayer.

    Further, the 1957 ed. re-instates much though not all of the 1902 removed section and does not re-add the St. Anthony Brief & V. R.s, nor the closing collecta.

    I heard Fr. Chad Ripperger (and without going into him and his situation) who, in less than his typical lucidity, stated that, categorically, the original prayer can be recited by NO ONE neither cleric nor laity.

    I hope this makes sense and that you may be able to assist.

    Very best regards.

    H

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Layman Chad Ripperger (fixed it for you)

      Delete
    2. H,
      Although I am familiar with the prayer, I'm not sure of all the details surrounding the alleged "suppression." The original is from 1886, not 1888, as it is recorded in the "Irish Ecclesiastical Review" 7 [1886], 1050.

      The 1888 prayer to St. Michael was composed by Pope Leo XIII and is a separate prayer. From what I've read, I see no reason to believe that it has been "suppressed" by enemies of the Church, who are---depending upon who you talk to--- (a) Masons, (b) Jews, (c) Masonic-Jews, (d) Satan worshippers, or (e) Modernists.

      (You can "mix and match" a through e, or like Hitler Fanboys, claim Jews comprise everyone in all the other categories without exception).

      Why does Mr. Ripperger claim "the original prayer can be recited by NO ONE neither cleric nor laity"?

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    3. If these “Hitler fanboys” really supported Hitler they would be Zionists. Just like Hitler was.

      Any normal person can tell you that the Jewish religion was behind masonry which was behind all those other categories

      DISCLAIMER: I AM NOT A HITLER FANBOY. (Hitler was just like Mao or Stalin but also a Zionist as thoroughly proven by Jim condit jr.)

      Delete
    4. Thank you for your response.

      1886? Does this prayer conclude with numerous + incantations of exorcism?

      The Raccolta cites the date of the prayer appended therein as 1888 and this is what is commonly referred to as the 'long prayer'. In lieu of the + specific exorcisms of the prayer referenced above, it has the Motto of St. Anthony (Behold the Cross of the Lord; be scattered ye hostile powers...) and similar and a collect prayer in conclusion.

      Ripperger, in uncharacteristic vagueness, says the Holy See suppressed the prayer somewhere between 1921-28, indicating some unspecified reason(s) for such. This is a short section commencing around the 12:30 mark in the following talkie:

      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zG_X_fEXxbs&t=12s&pp=2AEMkAIB

      Any further assistance you can give would be very much appreciated. I promote this prayer and, obviously, do not wish to lead others astray.

      Thank you again,

      H.

      Delete
    5. H,
      There are three prayers in total: 1886, 1888, and 1890. I was unable to find ANY suppression by the Holy See or Holy Office at any time. In the absence of positive proof of such a condemnation, the prayer may be recited with a clear conscience.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    6. Thank you very much, your effort is much appreciated. There is also a, I suppose informal, 1902 version from the RR sometimes labelled the 'Mid' version and which Fr. Cedaka examined, and which is just a highly redacted version of the 1888. Fr. suggests this refaction may have had something to do with diplomacy towards the Italian king at the time if memory serves.

      Delete
  5. H

    Do not call laymen “Fr.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cut the man some slack, please. I'm sure he realizes that Chad Ripperger is a Novus Ordo presbyter, not a Catholic priest.

      God's Blessings to all who visit this site!

      Delete
    2. @anon4:53
      God bless you as well, my friend!

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  6. Introibo,

    I have been noticing this YouTube channel lately popping up called MissHappyCatholic, this woman runs a group called Tradrecovery.

    https://www.tradrecovery.com/

    I find this site to be unfortunate and rather sad. I have yet to see a refutation or counter to the claims this woman is making. Not that I am taking her claims seriously. But they recently held a conference I guess for people who left groups like Sspx or sedevacantism. So, I am wondering what are your thoughts?

    Jeremy Van Auker

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jeremy,
      This site is LOADED with errors--and after I just glanced over it. Thank you for calling it to my attention. I will make a post on this for next month!!

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. I look forward to it, I do apologize for the off topic posts. But this one really caught my eye. It’s been for a while now. Thank you once again for all that you do.

      Jeremy Van Auker

      Delete
  7. @6:59am

    Jeremy,

    Thank you for posting this. This site was pretty eye opening. I agree with Introibo that there are a lot of errors on this site. I am almost tempted to write a refutation myself to them. I could definitely say a lot! I do understand though why a site like this exists. On a theological level, there is no (legitimate) answer from the Novus Ordo or R & R camps to Sedevacantism, because it is the true position. Still, people have bad experiences in life and unfortunately this happens more than people realize. As sad as it is for me to say this, I have met some Sedevacantists in my life who were the most uncharitable people that I have ever come across. I know much kinder Novus Ordo’s, Eastern Orthodox, Protestants, people of no faith, etc. You get my point. I have also met some wonderful Sedevacantists who are living saints. Like anything in life, it is a mixed bag. Please see my last post that I wrote to C.T. on Dominic’s last article “Creation-Terminology Metaphors.” That post was my experience at just one Sedevacantist church, and sadly there are MANY other people that are in the same boat. Some places are better than others. Some Sede camps are MUCH better than others! If you read through my post on that article, you will see that those people all had nightmare experiences at that church and left and that is truly unfortunate! But we have to follow what is true. All of the evidence points to Sedevacantism as the only viable option as what constitutes True Catholicism in this massive chaotic state in which we are living. Is it easy? NO WAY! It is VERY difficult! But we have to do our best to follow Our Lord and His teachings here and to be true to the faith and to ourselves. I noticed on that site’s blog, that many were former SSPX. It appeared more so than former Sedevacantist; but no matter. The point is people have bad experiences. I could write a LOT here to help you and others, but I have serious time restraints. I will simply say this and keep this simple. God made us to know Him, love Him, and serve Him, so that we may spend all eternity with Him. We cannot serve someone unless we first love him, and we cannot love him unless we know him. The two highest choirs of angels are the Seraphim and Cherubim. The Cherubim have knowledge of God that is so high, that human words cannot describe it. It is important to know God and have knowledge of the faith. But knowledge can be dangerous. The Seraphim are described as burning with charity for God. They supersede the Cherubim. They love God to such a high extent that, again, human words will not do it justice. It is important to have knowledge of God (see Hosea: 4:6), but it is WAY more important to have charity, which covers a multitude of sins. It is better to be a charitable person than a knowledgeable person. If people experienced high levels of charity when they went to Sedevacantist churches/chapels (as well as knowledgeable people who helped them along their faith journey), sites like the one you shared would not be needed as much.

    -TradWarrior

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is my experience with internet meaness:

      Woke people are often mentally ill and can't express themselves properly without asking you to commit suicide. This case has some exceptions, tho.

      Nazis will try to write an adequate refutation of you claims, failing miserably the moment they insult your grandma, call you a hidden jew or use crude language. There are exceptions here as well.

      I would count arrogant edgy atheists throwing straw men and blasphemy all around.

      Zionists who spend their time glorifying the killing of Palestinians definitely take the cake for a very specific reason. While none of the groups above is currently commiting a genocide, Zionists are doing one and they know it, and it is far more uncharitable to mock people when you are killing them than when you are just fighting online.

      While it is true that sedes should improve with their social habilities, I have noticed people who complain about how Hollywood makes their movies "woke" are much more likely to use profanity, crude language, and personally insult people. It being a mostly secular topic, I believe their criticisms should be more reserved.

      I find it ironic that they accuse sedes of being mean when they have Sam Shamoun, a talented but foul-mouthed and vulgar islamic polemicist. While the Dimondites call you a liar and a heretic, Shamoun is calling your mother a whore "who does muta with the shi'a". He himself nows this is bad but keeps doing it. On the other hand, some of this "meaness" criticisms could very well be undeserved exaggerations of expressing sternly what is true.

      -Poni

      Delete
    2. TradWarrior

      I do enjoy reading your writing. If people will listen to you.I too had a bad experience with a sede priest.He was turning a blind eye to sin in exchange for funds and roof over his head. It really shook my faith .I was called a troublemaker for exposing him.It was a sad state of affairs.

      Pray for me and my family please

      Delete
    3. Poni,
      What you write is very sad. It is depressing to see how low humans can go.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    4. @anon4:47
      Prayers for you, my friend.

      TradWarrior,
      You express it well--the truth comes first, and must be our biggest concern.

      God Bless you both,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  8. @anon4:47pm

    I will keep you and your family in my daily prayers.

    -TradWarrior

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hello Sir, I am looking for part 2 of the choleric. I looked but didn’t find it. Have you published it yet? Thank you :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Still no sacraments. I have begged for traditional sacraments but I can't even get an answer from the priest.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Apologies in advance if this is a very stupid question, however is it known which Apostolic lines still exist? Validly, in both Latin & Eastern rites?

    ReplyDelete