Monday, July 13, 2026

Recognizing The Occult---Part 4

 

This is the fourth of some posts I will publish on occult symbolism. I've written much on occult practices and how it influences things like music and movies, but not so much on occult symbols. Sometimes my friends will ask, "I want to buy [certain item they show me] but a writing or a picture on it looks strange. Is it occult?" Good question. Sometimes someone will know something is occult, but they don't know exactly why it's bad, other than the general condemnation of the occult by the Church and found in the Bible. 

This post will continue to expose occult symbolism. While many things today are occult, not every symbol or writing we don't understand is automatically "occult." We must learn to discern. You may be better equipped to help a family member or friend who has some occult symbol in his/her possession and may not realize it, thinking it harmless. My first post in this series was published on 4/27/26.  It is well worth reading first if you have not already done so--it gives some background on symbolism which I will not repeat here. 

I claim no credit for any of the material in this post. All I did was compile the research on the occult into a terse and reader-friendly installment on this blog. The material comes from many online and print resources.  I hope you find it useful. Please comment and let me know if you got something out of it.

God bless you all, my dear readers---Introibo

Ambiguous Occult Symbols
These symbols require careful discernment, as their meaning shifts with context—sometimes serving legitimate conventional purposes, other times signaling the occult.

Butterflies
Meaning: Sometimes it simply is used to show something pretty and decorative in the home. The occult meaning is the soul’s metamorphosis. The butterfly symbolizes transformation and immortality—in Greek, psyche means both “soul” and “butterfly.” Its life cycle (caterpillar-chrysalis-winged insect) provides a visual metaphor for the soul’s liberation from earthly limitations. 

Origin: Treasured across cultures for millennia, Aztecs used butterflies to represent souls of slain warriors, Greeks portrayed Psyche with butterfly wings as a mortal freed from death, and early Christians adopted the butterfly to symbolize the soul leaving the body at death and eternal life. 

Uses Today: Appears frequently in décor, fashion, memorial art, and tattoos signaling transformation and new life. Used by Carl Jung to reflect psychic vigor and stages of self-discovery. Popular as a wholesome symbol of renewal and resurrection. 

How it should be used: Early Catholics rightly embraced this imagery for resurrection (caterpillar-chrysalis-butterfly mirroring life-death-resurrection), but believers must distinguish Christ’s once-for-all triumph from pagan narratives of souls endlessly transmigrating through lifetimes via false/heretical reincarnation. 

Bees
Meaning: Lost in the swarm. In Freemasonry, the beehive represents “industry,” cooperation, and a well‑ordered community of workers laboring together under the “Great Architect.” In various occult and neo‑pagan traditions, the bee and queen bee are linked with the “Divine Feminine” and the generative power of nature. They are sometimes used to express ideas of group consciousness or a “hive mind,” where the individual is subordinated to the collective. 

Origin: In ancient Mediterranean religion, bees were regarded as sacred and as messengers between worlds, associated with the souls of the dead and the underworld. Priestesses of Demeter and Artemis were called Melissae (bees), serving the goddess of the hive with absolute obedience. Many ancients also believed that bees were born spontaneously from the carcasses of cattle (a practice known as bugonia), making them symbols of life emerging from death and of agricultural rebirth. 

Uses Today: In the occult, it is central to “honey jar” spells (popular in Voodoo and witchcraft), which are used to “sweeten” a target’s disposition or bind them in sticky emotional attachment. The hive also endures as a visible badge of “state-building” theology, appearing on Masonic aprons and as the official emblem of Utah (Mormonism’s “State of Deseret”) to mark a commitment to the collective work. Culturally, the “hive” label has been secularized by super-fandoms (like Beyoncé’s “BeyHive”) to signal a fierce, shared identity centered on a matriarchal figure. 

How it should be used: If a symbol of diligence ("busy as a bee") and spring in someone's home, there' no problem. Otherwise, no one should have anything to do with a symbol employed by the Synagogue of Satan.

Caduceus
Meaning: The wand of the deal-maker. Featuring two serpents entwined in a figure eight around a winged staff, it represents commerce, negotiation, and the alchemical “union of opposites.” In the occult, it is a symbol of Hermetic power and balance. In culture, it represents the trickster god Hermes—patron of merchants, thieves, and liars —making its frequent use in healthcare a bitter irony. 

Origin: Ancient Mesopotamia (c. 2600 BC) and Greece. It was the herald’s staff of Hermes, granting him safe passage between worlds. Its association with medicine is a modern error; historically, it has nothing to do with healing. 

Uses Today: Often mistakenly used as a medical symbol by some health organizations (the Rod of Asclepius, not Caduceus, is the historically accurate medical emblem). In occult contexts, it functions as a marker in alchemical art and mystical diagrams, signifying supernatural power and hidden wisdom. 

How it should be used: In medical settings, the Caduceus typically means healthcare, not magick, and can be accepted as a conventional professional sign. However, in Hermetic or alchemical settings, it signals a rival spirituality to avoid. Traditionalists must discern context and reject uses that promote occult worldviews. 



Rod of Asclepius
Meaning: The true sign of the healer. A single serpent wrapped around a rough staff, it represents the physician’s art: the intuition and skill needed to use potentially harmful substances (like snake venom) for restoration. It symbolizes the reality that healing often requires facing death and poison to extract life. 

Origin: The badge of the Cult of Asclepius, who was revered as the first physician and Greek god of medicine. Sick pilgrims would sleep in his temples among non venomous snakes, seeking a cure. It is the historically accurate emblem of medicine, distinct from the magical associations of the Caduceus. The symbol may have originated from a medical procedure for removing parasites by winding them around a stick. 

Uses Today: The historically accurate medical emblem for hospitals, medical associations, and healthcare organizations worldwide. Often confused with the Caduceus but represents legitimate medical practice and care. WARNING: Some think the symbol imparts healing. That is occult.

How it should be used: This symbol is appropriate as a conventional sign representing healthcare and the physician’s profession. However, Traditionalists must reject any notion that the image itself conveys spiritual power. God heals through ordinary means and sometimes miracles.

 Crescent Moon
Meaning: The distinctive curved shape of the waxing or waning moon, representing the changing lunar cycle. Symbolically connected to the feminine principle, water, fertility, renewal, and growth. When resting on its back, it resembles a chalice or vessel. 

Origin: Deeply rooted in antiquity, predating modern religious use by thousands of years. Historically associated with powerful goddesses like Artemis/Diana and the Moon Goddess Tanit. The Ottoman Empire adopted it as an imperial emblem after founder Osman witnessed it stretch across the sky in a dream. 

Uses Today: Appears as a national or religious emblem on flags of several nations and mosque architecture, particularly in Islamic contexts. Also found in jewelry, charms, and Neopagan lunar-magic iconography for ritual timing and practice. 

How it should be used: Sometimes a crescent moon will appear on children's pajama's to be a sign of nighttime/bedtime. No problems there. However, those who look to the moon in the occult are often seeking a “divine feminine” tenderness and a rhythm to life that feels more intuitive than rigid; they want to be held by a cycle greater than themselves. The "greater than themselves" they seek can only be found in Christ and His One True Church. 

Conclusion
As I wrote in my first three posts on this topic:

Symbols have deep meaning and are important. They link things tangible to realities that are intangible. We can't see love, but when a man brings red roses to his wife, love is symbolized. The ultimate symbol of love is the crucifix, God died so we may live forever. Those are wonderful symbols. However, when the symbol is linked to intangible evils by symbolizing heresies, immoralities and calling upon (evil) spirits for "protection" they become an invitation (wittingly or not) for evil to enter your life. Invite evil in and it will take you up on your request.  

53 comments:

  1. Probably it's been asked before, but how much does *intent* have to do with all these symbols ? Surely if it is a decoration there is no "lock" or rather "hook" for the demons to use ?

    The thing is anything may be defined as occult in one part of the world and have no meaning elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. cairsahr_stjoseph
      Intent does have much to do with calling in demonic forces. However, just as blessed sacramentals can call down God's grace, I believe some symbols can call up Hell. Regardless of culture, if something is used to call upon the demonic, that's what it does. We must be careful regarding what we place on our person and in our home.

      Yes, with some symbols intent is everything--or at least almost everything. If someone puts a painting of bees in the home to make it decorative, it's not occult.

      Excellent comment as always!

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  2. The butterfly is also associated with the mind control experiments MK-Ultra, known alternatively as Project Monarch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Poni,
      I did not know that! Thank you for commenting!

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. I thought everybody knew that, otherwise I might have made a similar comment.

      Delete
  3. Introibo:
    A few questions:
    1. Who is your favorite SSPV/CSPV priest? I mean as far as preaching goes?
    2. If a person is falsely accused of doing something wrong, is it okay if they don't apologize? I am going through this very thing. My conscience is completely clear.
    3. Any more news on "Father" M.E. Morrison?
    4. Other than Father DePauw, favorite priest from "his era"?
    5. How much should a priest be able to know about a convert's/chapel member's physical health? Assuming the person's mental health and communication skills are pretty normal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon1:14
      1. Best overall preacher (IMO) Bishop Santay. Best priest preacher, Fr. Leo Vitkus.

      2. You have no need to apologize if you know you did nothing wrong. As a matter of fact, you SHOULD NOT apologize, as it makes you look as if you did something wrong.

      3. No. A very intelligent and affable man, but he will never divulge who ordained him. Hence, I must regard his ordination as dubious and invalid in practice.

      4. Fr. Paul Wickens (1930-2004; ordained 1955). Very humble, down to earth, and when he saw the truth, he followed it regardless of the cost. Please say a prayer for the repose of his soul.

      5. Nothing. I can't think of any reason that they would need health information.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. I just learned one CSPV Priest has and uses the very Chalice Father Francis Fenton owned since 1944!
      -Andrew

      Delete
  4. Fr. Curatola and Fr. Harber give good sermons.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon5:47
      I'm not putting down any priest of the SSPV, that was just my personal opinion and nothing more. It is also my opinion that all SSPV priests should preach on sedevacantism. It would do much to educate people.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. I have it on good authority that Bp Carroll has been thinking about that as well. Not sure where it will go...

      Delete
  5. Introibo, I remember reading an article on the Tradition In Action site that gave much info about bees as a symbol in the Church. They do have many interesting articles. Not Sede, of course. Hello from exotic Philippines !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon5:55
      Hello! Always good to have readers from the Philippines! Thank you for the info re: bees.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  6. That last one is most mysterious. Please don't take my take on it seriously:

    For it looks like a banana 🤤

    We are allowed a little levity once in a while.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. cairsahr_stjoseph
      Lol! Yes, it does!

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  7. The difference between good and evil lies in discernment, knowing when to use methods, and when not to. The occult seeks to maximize power, often leading to misusage. The divine aligns with purpose, growth, and spirituality. True strength is not in force, but in alignment. When we choose awareness over excess, we rise; when we align with purpose, fear dissolves and positive growth starts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. G. Schiere MSc.
      Mr. Schiere, I'm not sure what your comment means, but I visited one of your blogs, and you view things from a Buddhist perspective. That is pagan.

      You write: "The occult seeks to maximize power, often leading to misusage."

      Reply: No, it is inherently wicked. "Let no one be found among you who sacrifices their son or daughter in the fire, who practices divination or sorcery, interprets omens, engages in witchcraft, or casts spells, or who is a medium or spiritist or who consults the dead. Anyone who does these things is detestable to the Lord; because of these same detestable practices the Lord your God will drive out those nations before you." (Deuteronomy 18:10-12).

      You write: "The difference between good and evil lies in discernment, knowing when to use methods, and when not to."

      Reply: The difference between good and evil is being on the side of Christ and His One True Church (good) or being against Him and His Church (evil).

      I hope you continue to read here and learn about the faith. I pray for your conversion, so one day you may get to Heaven.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  8. Going back and analysing comments appended to various articles in recent times, it appears that crusty old Leo has been missed by some. Goodness knows why! He may have been down, for good reason, but he is by no means out. Remember that a bad weed is hard to kill. When opportunity permits, I may impose more boorish opinions on the long-suffering readership.

    May God bless Introibo and all who comment on this blog - and those who read it too.

    Leo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Welcome back Leo

      Boorish comments? I think not. I have been most impressed with your views and comments. Thank you very much and God bless

      Delete
    2. Leo,
      Welcome back to the comments!

      God Bless

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    3. Dear Introibo, July 16, 2026 at 5:18 PM,

      Thank you! It's nice to be able to read your posts again.

      I have a question about Steven Speray: it seems he has stirred up a hornet's nest with an apparently controversial article about Fatima. Since I have a more than passing interest in this topic, I tried to access his website (I had seen it occasionally in the past) to read about his stance, but found, to my disappointment, that his site is no longer in the public domain, so how can I read what Steve has to say? For the record, there are mysterious aspects to the Fatima story that I cannot reconcile and/or make sense of, but the Church has approved it and I have to bow to her judgment over my own feeble one.

      In Our Lady of Fatima,
      Leo

      Delete
  9. Introibo,

    Your above comments

    1, Father Paul Wickens- Yes, indeed let us pray for the repose of his Soul. A very kind and humble priest. He did much good

    2, Father Leo Vitkus- Yes, indeed a great preacher. We have never met him but his sermons are amazing. We pray for him daily.

    On a different subject, we have learned that all the so called Orthodox Churches like the Russians, etc permit the use of condoms in marriage. What a disgrace. Are you aware of this?

    God bless

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The so called Churches of the Orthodox also permit divorce and remarriage up to three times. Why are so many "converting" to them here in the US? It's beyond belief. Behind the smokescreen of ritual, etc is rot. What are your thoughts Introibo? Blessings

      Delete
    2. @anon1:17 and 8:04
      EO is a false religion, of course. I think the reason for the conversions are two-fold:
      (a) It dispenses of figuring a way out of sedevacantism

      (b) it offers a more reverent liturgy than the Vatican II sect and still has loose moral values--not as loose as the V2 sect--but not Traditional Catholic Morality.

      As to artificial birth control, it varies from country to country, but most EO clergy permit it--at least since after WW2.

      God Bless you both

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    3. Mostly younger men are converting to the schismatic eastern “orthodox” sect because they are looking for answers and a sense of masculine values and belonging in a feminized and gynocentric world. Eastern “Orthodoxy” is false and is also schismatic and it’s a dead end, but many younger men are fooled by the beards and externals. This schismatic sect rejects the Papacy and The Filioque. Many young men see the demonic antics of the Novus Ordo sect and they realize that it’s the religion of weak effeminate men, religious Liberty, and sodomites so they run the other way. Rightfully so, but hopefully they come to the true position of Sedevacantism.

      Delete
    4. The Eastern Heterodox Churches (erroneously called "Orthodox" - they are anything but) are more than schismatical: they are HERETICAL. Note that they explicitly denied Our Blessed Lady's Immaculate Conception because the dogma was defined by Pope Pius IX. The EHC accept the sainthood of Pope Gregory the Great, knowing he declared that Constantinople was SUBJECT TO (and not just in communion with) the Apostolic See. Of course the apostate body calling itself the Catholic Church claims that the EH are "sister Churches" and in "partial communion" with Rome. That is typical whack job theology: one is either in communion or one is not. Is a woman "partially pregnant"? The irony is that the EH have kept valid orders, while some of the "Eastern Rites" in communion with enemy-occupied Rome might have lost theirs.

      Leo

      Delete
  10. ntroibo:

    What do you think about this SSPX pilgrimage?:

    https://sspx.org/en/events/santa-fe-pilgrimage-2026-lyons-ks-57727

    Is it extreme? 33 miles of walking overnight with no sleep!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon12:56
      Definitely sounds extreme. Not something I would recommend.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  11. Introibo .

    Regarding the Eastern Orthodox, there has been cases of sex abuse in those sects and sodomites. Correct

    There are many break away orthodox groups all claiming to be the true Orthodox church. One group is called the Old Believers, have you heard of them. There is a Church in Erie, PA that is called Old Rite - Russian Orthodox Church

    What about the so called Oriental Orthodox like the Coptics and Armenians?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's one huge mess just like with the various Protestant sects. Once you cut off from the unity of the Catholic Church, there's no stopping when it comes to multiplying errors, heresies, and immorality.

      Delete
    2. @anon7:52 and 9:18
      Coptics, and all Orthodox, suffer from the same problem as the Protestants---I agree with you @9:18

      God Bless you both,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  12. Speaking of the EO, Introibo what do you think of some of their recent ' Saints' who performed "miracles"
    Would you recommend folk not to read their writings or only if they have a deep understanding of Traditional Catholic Theology to see their errors.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon10:51
      The latter: don't read the writings without a deep understanding of Catholic theology to see their errors!
      True miracles can only take place within the One True Church.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. Was Padre Pio's miracles false after 1965 since he was in the false novus ordo religion?



      Delete
  13. Many thanks Introibo for more info on the occult. Wow, learning many new things. Scary times we live in and few really care. Keep the Faith at all costs and don't despair

    -- God bless

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon2:24
      You said it well: " Keep the Faith at all costs and don't despair"

      Thank you for commenting, my friend!

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
  14. Introibo – nice article (as always)!

    Leo – welcome back!

    God bless,

    -TradWarrior

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Introibo Ad Altare DeiJuly 17, 2026 at 10:07 PM

      TradWarrior,
      Thank you my friend!

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  15. Introibo, so you would not recommend a Traditional Catholic who has a good knowledge of the True Faith to look at those "Orthodox" writings of the Russians, Coptic , etc.

    By the way, have you heard of the Ethopian Orthodox bible which it's folk claim contains some lost books of the bible. I believe there is something wrong there. Your thoughts
    '

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Introibo Ad Altare DeiJuly 17, 2026 at 10:06 PM

      @anon9:24
      I said the opposite. One firmly entrenched in Catholic theology could look at EO writings. I havent heard about “lost books” of the Bible, but that’s nonsense on stilts!

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. There are no "lost books" of the Bible. The Church drew up the complete canon of inspired scripture under the guidance of the Holy Ghost. A lot of those obscure works, quite often attributed to the Apostles and Disciples, were written by the Gnostics and other enemies of the Faith. A few of the older ones, going back to before the time of Our Lord, some of ancient authorship, are even mentioned and quoted in both the Old and New Testaments. Nevertheless, they are not part of Holy Scripture.

      Leo

      Delete
    3. Thanks Leo. You have hit the nail on the head regarding the so called lost books of the bible. Correct the True Church did indeed have a complete canon of inspired scripture under the guidance of the Holy Ghost.
      It is a complete utter joke that many Novus bogus folk have protestant scripture in there homes and new age temples. God bless you our friend
      P.S. I am a former Methodist who attends the CSPV. I converted some years back and this site of Introibo is my best for solid info. You also bring in sound advice like TradWarrior.Keep the great comments coming please and remember you are all in my daily prayers

      Delete
    4. Introibo and Leo are right. The canon of the Bible has been infallibly fixed by the Church. Searching in vain for some "lost" book of Holy Scripture is a sure way to get entangled in heresy. The Church is infallible in decreeing what belongs to Holy Writ and what does not.

      anon 9:24
      The intention is key. Even if you're well-versed in the Faith, reading schismatic theology and spirituality out of curiosity is very imprudent.
      In my opinion, one should only reach for the writings of heretics if the purpose is to refute their false claims. But in order to refute false claims, one must already possess a thorough konwledge of what is true. This is, unfortunately, sorely lacking in many Traditionalists (I dare say most). How many have studied Ott's 'Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma'? This is a basic pre-Vatican 2 course in dogmatic theology. It's impossible to detect error if one doesn't know what the Church actually teaches.

      God Bless,
      Joanna

      P.S. Leo, it's great to have you back!

      Delete
    5. Dear Joanna,

      Nie ma za co!

      I left a message for you on the recent article about Our Lady of Fatima - and acknowledged a kind Anonymous contributor (there are many of them around!) too. Your fluency po angielsku is amazing!!

      Serdeczne pozdrowienia,

      Leo

      Delete
    6. Dear Anonymous, July 19, 2026 at 2:24 AM,

      Your message is much appreciated, as are your prayers; only too happy to be of some assistance. It is edifying to hear you are a convert. Your background must have helped you to recognise the Novus Bogus garbage for the apostasy it is. In fact, it is much deadlier than all of the Protestant sects put together. Who needs spurious "lost books" to lead one astray when the false translations of Holy Scripture used by the outfit headed by Sideshow Bob Prevost are more than adequate to serve that purpose.

      Remain fortes in fide,

      Leo

      Delete
    7. @anon2:24am,

      Thank you. I appreciate the kind remarks.

      God bless you,

      -TradWarrior

      Delete
  16. Thanks Introibo. My misunderstanding of your answer to the other question pertaining to a devout Traditional catholic with good knowledge looking at those EO writings. Sorry.

    It does sound nonsense. The bible is listed on Amazon books.

    Perhaps in the future you could do a writing on the errors of the EO.

    God bless

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hello Leo
    Welcome back. You like TradWarrior always have good comments. You have been missed.
    God bless
    P. Australia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear P of Oz,

      Thank you for your nice words. I am in awe of TradWarrior: his articles and comments are a mine of information and thought-provoking opinions, which are well worth reading and contemplating.

      God bless you and TW,

      Leo

      Delete
    2. P. Australia,

      Thank you very much.

      God bless you,

      -TradWarrior

      Delete
    3. Leo,

      Thank you very kindly. Your comment means a lot!

      God bless,

      -TradWarrior

      Delete
    4. Leo
      Have you ever been Down Under to visit? Have you been anywhere else overseas?
      Your statement the Bogus Sect headed by Prevost is more dangerous then all the Protestant Sects is spot on.
      At my the workplace of my wife where it is almost all women. It has a large number of immigrants from the Philippines which makes the claim of being a "Catholic" country. All of these women boast being shacked up with a "partner" , use the pill and condoms and talk about they have no problem with "open" sexual relationships. This is how far gone our sick world has become.

      P, Australia

      Delete
    5. Dear P of Down Under,

      When I was a young man, many years ago, I did a lot of overseas travel, including visiting your country. Those days, alas, are now well and truly over and I have no choice but to content myself with staying at home.
      The Philippines is by no means unique, as there is not one Catholic country left in the world. It is shocking to hear and observe what many self-styled Catholics of any nationality say and do. They are more scandalous than pagans and atheists. All part and parcel of The Great Apostasy. When the salt loses its savour..

      Greetings from another part of the world,

      Leo


      Delete