Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Today, March 13, 2013, the Vatican II sect elected their sixth antipope, Jorge Bergoglio of Argentina, who will take the name "Pope" Francis. Unfortunately, he is a surreptitious Modernist like Ratzinger, who will continue to advance "Frankenchurch" under the guise of being "conservative."
He is perceived as conservative because he will probably not introduce women priestesses, or allow abortion. The record of Mr. Bergoglio, the first layman "pope" neither validly ordained (1969) or consecrated (1992), speaks differently and has some pseudo-traditionalists scared. From one such blog, they write:
"Of all the unthinkable candidates, Jorge Mario Bergoglio is perhaps the worst. Not because he openly professes doctrines against the faith and morals, but because, judging from his work as Archbishop of Buenos Aires, faith and moral seem to have been irrelevant to him.
A sworn enemy of the Traditional Mass, he has only allowed imitations of it in the hands of declared enemies of the ancient liturgy. He has persecuted every single priest who made an effort to wear a cassock, preach with firmness, or that was simply interested in Summorum Pontificum.
Famous for his inconsistency (at times, for the unintelligibility of his addresses and homilies), accustomed to the use of coarse, demagogical, and ambiguous expressions, it cannot be said that his magisterium is heterodox, but rather non-existent for how confusing it is.
His entourage in the Buenos Aires Curia, with the exception of a few clerics, has not been characterized by the virtue of their actions. Several are under grave suspicion of moral misbehavior.
He has not missed any occasion for holding acts in which he lent his Cathedral to Protestants, Muslims, Jews, and even to partisan groups in the name of an impossible and unnecessary interreligious dialogue. He is famous for his meetings with protestants in the Luna Park arena where, together with preacher of the Pontifical House, Raniero Cantalamessa, he was "blessed" by Protestant ministers, in a common act of worship in which he, in practice, accepted the validity of the "powers" of the TV-pastors.
This election is incomprehensible: he is not a polyglot, he has no Curial experience, he does not shine for his sanctity, he is loose in doctrine and liturgy, he has not fought against abortion or homosexual "marriage"[approved with practically no opposition from the episcopate], he has no manners to honor the Pontifical Throne. He has never fought for anything else than to remain in positions of power.
It really cannot be what Benedict wanted for the Church. And he does not seem to have any of the conditions required to continue his work."
Alas, it is EXACTLY what Ratzinger wanted, namely, another unrepentant Modernist. They may differ in style but their substance is the same--Satanic. More about Bergoglio in the days ahead.