Monday, September 23, 2019

Reclaiming Halloween



 October is around the corner, and that means Halloween will be upon us soon. At this time of year evangelical and fundamentalist Protestants send out stern warnings that no one should participate in this "Satanic holiday." Members of the Vatican II sect (and even some Traditionalists) will say that there's nothing wrong with Halloween celebrations at all. So who is right? In this case, I happen to believe both to be wrong. As Traditionalists, we know that Halloween is a contraction of the words "All Hallow's Eve" or the day/evening before the great feast of All Saints Day on November 1, a Holy Day of Obligation in many countries, including the United States.

Here is the terse, yet excellent background to the celebration of All Saints Day taken from the Catholic Encyclopedia of 1913:

In the early days the Christians were accustomed to solemnize the anniversary of a martyr's death for Christ at the place of martyrdom. In the fourth century, neighboring dioceses began to interchange feasts, to transfer relics, to divide them, and to join in a common feast; as is shown by the invitation of St. Basil of Caesarea (379) to the bishops of the province of Pontus. Frequently groups of martyrs suffered on the same day, which naturally led to a joint commemoration. In the persecution of Diocletian the number of martyrs became so great that a separate day could not be assigned to each. But the Church, feeling that every martyr should be venerated, appointed a common day for all. The first trace of this we find in Antioch on the Sunday after Pentecost. We also find mention of a common day in a sermon of St. Ephrem the Syrian (373), and in the 74th homily of St. John Chrysostom (407). At first only martyrs and St. John the Baptist were honored by a special day. Other saints were added gradually, and increased in number when a regular process of canonization was established; still, as early as 411 there is in the Chaldean Calendar a "Commemoratio Confessorum" for the Friday after Easter. In the West Boniface IV, 13 May, 609, or 610, consecrated the Pantheon in Rome to the Blessed Virgin and all the martyrs, ordering an anniversary. Gregory III (731-741) consecrated a chapel in the Basilica of St. Peter to all the saints and fixed the anniversary for 1 November. A basilica of the Apostles already existed in Rome, and its dedication was annually remembered on 1 May. Gregory IV (827-844) extended the celebration on 1 November to the entire Church. The vigil seems to have been held as early as the feast itself. The octave was added by Sixtus IV (1471-84).

What about the day before; our current Halloween? Is it Satanic? Harmless and good fun? This post will examine the controversy surrounding the celebration of Halloween and my thoughts on what we, as Traditionalists, should do.


Satanic Origin Or Guilt By Association?
It is generally agreed that, in Church history, Halloween took the place of a special day celebrated by the ancient Druids, who were the learned or "priestly class" of the Celtic religion. The Celts were the first Aryan people who came from Asia to settle in Europe. In fact, we can see certain similarities between Druidism and the religion of India: "Celtic religion, presided over by the Druids (the priestly order) presents beliefs in various nature deities and certain ceremonies and practices that are similar to those in Indian religion. The insular Celts and the people of India also shared certain similarities of language and culture, thus indicating a common heritage." (See Celtic Religion, Encyclopedia Britannica, Macropedia, vol. 3). 

According to Ronald Hutton in The Stations of the Sun: A History of the Ritual Year in Britain, Samhain referred to Celtic Halloween and its customs all the way up until the 19th century ([1996], p. 369). The powerful Druid priests were deemed kings of the occult practitioners, and were known for worshiping evil spirits and sacrificing humans to their demon gods. The Celts celebrated the day of death (i.e., Samhain) in anticipation of the dark, cold winter months. The eve of Samhain marked the special time of the year when the Druids taught that demons, souls and gods were unleashed on the world to bring blessing or wreak havoc and destruction on unsuspecting souls. Samhain therefore begins on the evening of October 31 and ends in the evening of November 1st. Interestingly, many credible sources cite the phenomenon of "crop circles" as overwhelmingly happening (some say over 90%) within the geographical proximity of the ancient and possibly druidic ruins of Stonehenge. Some of these phenomena are considered to be of supernatural origin. (See, e.g., Jeremy Northcote of Edith Cowan University,Australia; file:///C:/Users/Guest1/Downloads/Northcote06.pdf)

Druid priests began their New Year on November 1, which marked the beginning of Winter. They apparently believed that on October 31, the night before their New Year, and the last day of the old year, the Lord of Death gathered the souls of the evil dead who had been condemned to enter the bodies of animals. He then decided what animal form they would take for the next year. (Like the Hindu pagans, the Celtic pagans believed in reincarnation. The souls of the so-called good dead were said to be reincarnated as humans.) The Druids also believed that the punishment of the evil dead could be lightened by sacrifices, prayers and gifts to the Lord of Death.

On this night, evil or frustrated ghosts were also supposed to play tricks on humans and to cause supernatural manifestations. As part of the celebration, people donned grotesque masks and danced around the great bonfires often pretending they were being pursued by evil spirits. And while these bonfires were lit to scare away evil spirits, food was put out to make the ghosts or souls of the good dead that Samhain had released feel welcome and at home.

Because Samhain marked the beginning of a new year, an interest in divination and fortune-telling became an important part of this holiday. For example, the Druids believed that the particular shape of various fruits and vegetables could divine the future. Victims of human sacrifice were used for the same purpose. When the Romans conquered Britain, some of their customs were added to those of the Druids while others, such as human sacrifice, were banned. (See Robert J. Myers, Celebrations: The Complete Book of American Holidays , [1972], p. 259; See also, Becky Stevens Cordello, Celebrations, [1977], p. 112).

Today, Halloween is a truly occult holiday for many Celtic Neo-Pagans, Wiccans (witches) and Satan worshipers. Many who are involved in the occult view Halloween as a religious holiday and are acutely aware that it is rooted in pagan worship. (See Ronald Hutton, The Pagan Religions of the Ancient British Isles: Their Nature and Legacy, [1991], pp. 327–341). According to Anton LaVey, who founded the Church of Satan in 1966 and authored The Satanic Bible in 1969, Halloween is the third highest day on the demonic calendar for Satanists. LaVey wrote in The Satanic Bible:
"After one’s own birthday, the two major Satanic holidays are Walpurgisnacht (May 1st) and Halloween." (See The Satanic Bible,  p. 96).

However, the question remains,does this make Halloween evil, pagan,and Satanic? The One True Church has often replaced days that were used for evil with feasts to celebrate the holy. The most recent example, of which I can remember, is May 1st. It is the second highest day for Satanists, and was "May Day" for the atheistic Communists to show their military might for use against all those who opposed its tyranny. Pope Pius XII  replaced the feast of Sts. Philip and James on May 1st with the Feast of St. Joseph the Workman. (May is also dedicated to the Most Blessed Virgin Mary). The holy Pontiff wanted the true Christian meaning of labor, as exemplified by St. Joseph, to be celebrated against and in place of  the false and evil system of Communism. 

Let us also not forget the aforementioned Roman Pantheon mentioned in the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia cited above. The Roman Pantheon is the most preserved and influential building of ancient Rome. It was a Roman temple dedicated to all the false "gods" of pagan Rome. As the brick stamps on the side of the building reveal, it was built and dedicated between A.D 118 and 125. Pope Boniface IV converted it into a Catholic Church and consecrated it to St. Mary and the Martyrs on May 13, 609. (Some sources say the year was 610 A.D.). This idea of Halloween being evil because the day has been associated with evil is no different from Jehovah's Witnesses who claim celebrating your birthday is wrong because when the Pharaoh and King Herod celebrated their birthdays, they murdered someone. I do not believe Halloween is evil per se. 


How Halloween Has Become Evil and How Traditionalists Can Reclaim It 

In my opinion, one of the worst things that happened to Christmas was Santa Claus. This is a ploy by the enemies of Christ to take away from the Christian meaning of Christmas. It requires parents to  lie to their children about the existence of a mythical creature with God-like characteristics (he knows who's good and bad, can be everywhere in the world in one night, etc), and when the kids realize their mother and father lied about it, it lessens their belief in other things their parents tell them; like the existence of God. Such was my own personal experience as a child. Telling the children about St. Nicholas, and being truthful with presents, is a very Traditional Catholic way to celebrate the birth of Our Lord.  In like manner, the true meaning of Easter has been obfuscated by eggs, rabbits, and candy; the Resurrection of Jesus Christ has, for many children, no real connection to Easter.

Now, consider modern day Halloween.  Since the emergence of the Vatican II sect, how many children understand what it means in relation to All Saints Day? As a matter of fact, the sect has eliminated the precept of attending their Novus Bogus "mass" on November 1st. It is abolished whenever the day falls on Saturday or Monday. In Hawaii, their "bishop," with approval of the Modernist Vatican, eliminated all Holy Days of Obligation except the Immaculate Conception (December 8th) and Christmas. Far worse is the revival of pagan customs. These will be described below and Traditionalist substitutions recommended.

1. Dressed to Kill?
There is nothing wrong with getting dressed up in costumes, but it does matter if evil is celebrated thereby. I've heard V2 sect apologists for immoral and evil costumes say "it's a way to mock evil." Dressing up as something evil thereby "mocks" it? To children, it will be less of a "mockery" and instead be seen as  a glorification of things they should not be contemplating in their young and impressionable minds. Below are some of the most popular costumes from last year. Can any parent worthy of the title "Traditionalist Catholic" read the list and think there's nothing wrong with these costumes? 

  • Ghostbusters. This is a girl's costume from the 2016 reboot of the 1984 mega-hit starring John Belushi and Dan Akroyd. The protagonists travel through time and space to combat a host of demonic and supernatural threats using silly "science methods" to dispatch of these threats. All mention of exorcism or fighting evil in the name and by the power of Jesus Christ was excluded from the movie by Dan Akroyd.  Akroyd (b. 1952) was baptized in the True Church and wanted to be a priest until Vatican II came along, and he renounced Christianity in 1969 at the age of 17.  "It's well-documented that original Ghostbuster and screenwriter Dan Aykroyd doesn't just enjoy the paranormal, but is a full-fledged believer in parapsychology and comes from a long line of followers of spiritualism. His father, Peter H. Aykroyd, wrote a book all about it. Modern American Spiritualism is the formal way to describe followers of the Spiritualist Church, and it goes back to the mid-19th century, when a small group of people began the spiritualist movement and, with it, paranormal investigation." (See https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/real-life-science-based-religion-inspired-ghostbusters; Emphasis mine)
  • Star Wars. Costumes of characters for both boys and girls. The entire Star Wars franchise is about a war in a galaxy "far, far, away." The Jedi Knights in this galaxy have practices that the first movie (now with the prequels it's renumbered the fourth movie; "A New Hope") that are directly referred to as "religion" no less than three times. A character named Tarkin states to Darth Vader, "The Jedi are extinct...you, my friend, are all that's left of their religion." The Force is an impersonal and universal energy field that permeates all things in the universe. It is neither good nor evil in itself, but it can be used for either purpose. While not omnipotent, it is the source of great power to perform feats that defy natural laws, such as gravity. All religions have an Ultimate of some kind. The Force is an omnipresent, supernatural power that surrounds all things and to which all things return. The Force is, therefore, the equivalent of God or a Supreme Being. Eastern pantheism and pagan practices permeate every movie
  • Wonder Woman. A very immodest and immoral costume for girls. Extremely revealing and tight fitting, no young girl (especially young teens) of any decency should wear this costume.
  • Deadpool. As one source accurately describes this anti-hero; "...[Deadpool] is neither good nor bad. He works on both sides, but is not loyal to either. He is a mercenary and assassin who would alter the world to bring down his target, for a price. Deadpool is a psychopath, a hero, a villain, and the most mysterious madman you could ever chance to encounter."(See https://www.quora.com/Is-Deadpool-a-good-guy-or-a-bad-guy)

Add to this list the horror movie characters of Jason and Freddie Krueger (both fictitious serial killers), and the evil supernatural characters of witches, vampires, and demons. What can be done? Have children dress up as a saint, and have your child learn all he can about this saint. These are the role models children should aspire to be. Does your son like things medieval? Dress up as King St. Louis IX! Want to be a lawyer? St. Thomas More will fit the role. For girls, there is the martyr of purity, St. Maria Goretti, and the equally brave St. Joan of Arc. Parents should take their kids trick-or-treating so they can explain the costume with their children to others who inquire.

Consider "All Saints Day" parties at home instead of trick-or-treating; have a parade of saints and fun in the house!

2. Give sanctity instead of sugar. When children come to the house for candy, give some money with a Holy Card. On the back, inscribe the Traditionalist Church or Chapel that is closest. You never know when curiosity upon finding this card will get some parent to go there. Instead of a "jack-o-lantern," carve some holy scene in the pumpkin or put a holy candle in the window.

3. Have a reading from the life of a saint to end the night and pray for the Holy Souls in Purgatory before going to bed and attending Mass on November 1st. A child should be "wowed" by the fascinating life of one of the saints. Let them know they can and should become saints too, and then others will be celebrating them on November 1st. In anticipation of All Souls Day, say a decade of the Rosary together for the Poor Souls waiting entrance into Heaven. Remind them that going to Mass is the real highlight ending Halloween. 

Conclusion
Halloween has become the antithesis of what is was meant to be. Instead of detracting from paganism, the world, lead by the Vatican II sect, has made Halloween just as pagan as it once was by taking all emphasis off of the true meaning. Let a Traditionalist reclaiming of the day begin! Celebrate saints and things holy, not killers and the occult. Instead of sugar, give out a chance to read about a saint and attend a real Mass for those who come to your house. Do these things and make the day a Christian revival culminating in the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. Do this, and one day, with God's grace, we may all celebrate November 1st as saints together in Heaven.  

72 comments:

  1. Why does Anton Lavey call ones own birthday the most evil day of the year? Is it because in Satanism the idea of self indulgence, self love, and do what thou wilt is the whole of the law and they therefore believe that your birthday is a way to glorify yourself in the wrong way?

    I don't really understand why Walpurgisnacht (May 1st) is the second most evil day of the year either according to him. From what I've read Saint Walpurga is the patron saint against witchcraft. People would light bonfires in her honor to ward off demons and she is said to have converted a lot of people to the Faith.

    Just a thought, but notice how in the year 1969 Anton Lavey composed the Satanic Bible is also the same year the New Mass was officially said throughout the whole Vatican II Church. Coincidence?

    I like your idea of evangelization to trick or treaters although I do have some concerns about it. Money and holy cards are a nice idea although I think kids or parents would likely throw the holy card away or possibly use the card and profane it? It could be me, but because our world is so far gone, (lost) I don't think it's a good idea to invite just anybody to Church. I've learned that if people really are serious they will call or take the initiative to find what they are looking for. If they are ignorant or in doubt, that is the best time to instruct them (when they are actually listening). Your very aware of extremist like Feenyites. How would you like it if somebody from the general public took an interest in traditional Catholicism out of curiosity and once they came to Church became disruptive or were trouble makers afterwards and was as bad or worse than a Feenyite ? What if they dissuaded some other good people who regularly attend but who were nevertheless weak from coming back? I've seen it happen. It's rare to see people come in good faith and even more importantly stick with it. Forgive my pessimism in that regard.

    Lastly, don't forget October 31st is also Luther's day. It wouldn't surprise me if Francis I (Jorge) dressed up like Martin Luther with a 95 thesis in his hands, celebrating the 502nd Anniversary.

    Lee

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lee,
      Birthdays are “self-indulgent” hence the connection to Satanists.

      May 1st is the “witches revenge” on the saint—you cannot get rid of us!

      I don’t think 1969 is a coincidence either for the Satanic Bible and the Novus Bogus “mass”!

      I understand your concerns about inviting people to a Traditionalist Church or Chapel, but people of ill will can be weeded out. Fr DePauw invited all; and asked some to leave, but many converts were made (including me!).

      Lastly, Bergoglio goes way beyond Luther to the point where the Protestant Deformation seems almost orthodox in comparison !

      Thank you for the thoughtful comment as always!

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. All points are well taken. Thanks as always.

      Lee

      Delete
    3. I'm not sure why "Lee" has an issue with EENS. It was Catholic dogma for millenia. I believe it's still Catholic dogma, regardless what the N.O. church states.

      As for some other of the comments below, conspiracy "theory", is a term weaponized by the Central Intelligence Agency (that is well known/declassified) after the Kennedy assassination and used in order to belittle, demean and ostracize anyone who questioned the government's single bullet explanation after looking into circumstances and evidence surrounding that watershed event as well as so many others, before and since. The term has worked wonders for them ever since.

      Delete
    4. @CumExApostolatusOfficio,
      Lee has no problem with EENS, only with Feeneyites. You must be a member of the Church to be saved, but Baptism of Desire and Baptism of Blood can substitute for the sacrament of Baptism in rare circumstances. Such has always been Church teaching.
      See my post:
      http://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2019/07/feeneyite-follies.html

      While I agree there are conspiracies, I carefully distinguish the "Grand Conspiracy" scenario, whereby EVERYTHING is controlled by wild-eyed conspirators (usually Jewish Freemasons) and nothing is as it appears to be. The moon landing, 9/11, Newtown shooting, etc are all "fake." The world is flat, and only a few "enlightened ones" can see through it all and realize "the truth is out there." (apologies to the X-Files). THAT is without merit and wacky in the extreme.

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    5. CumExApostolatusOfficio,

      Where did I state that I have a problem with EENS? I don't believe there is salvation outside the Catholic Church. I also don't believe there is salvation inside the Novus Ordo Church because it's not the Catholic Church.

      I suggest you read these articles: https://novusordowatch.org/2019/04/father-leonard-feeney-justification-salvation/
      and https://stevensperay.wordpress.com/2018/01/28/st-alphonsus-liguori-the-council-of-trent-and-baptism-of-desire/

      The first one is about Fr. Leonard Feeney taught coming from his own writings. The second one is about what St. Alphonsus Liguori taught from his writings. After you get done reading the two articles, you tell me which of the two you agree with. If you're a sound thinking person I think you'll know the answer right away.

      Lee

      Delete
    6. I've been "in this" for quite some time. I take offense at anyone who thinks that anything is the way it appears to be. If you truly think that the Hegelian dialectic isn't in full operation, and that we've not been lied to, to one degree or another, about most everything, then you're not paying attention. September 11, 2001 did indeed happen, but HOW it happened and who orchestrated it has been obfuscated by mainstream media AS WELL as those in alternative media, and dare I say it, the church, whether N.O. or self-proclaimed Traditionalists. Unless and UNTIL the perennial enemies of the Church are called out and called to account for what they've done in finance, in banking, in media, in government, in education, in 'popular' culture, AND most especially, INSIDE the Church, we're all just whistling past the graveyard. (1 Thessalonians 2:14-15 Douay-Rheims) So, go ahead and write blogs about how a Catholic should celebrate All Hallows Eve, but you're not in the fight. I assisted at Mass at Ave Maria Chapel years ago, in my "formative" years. Fr. Depauw was a good priest, but, in my opinion, he didn't go far enough. He was waiting for Rome to return to Catholicism. He should've known that wasn't going to happen. What could he have done about it as one priest/man? I'm not sure. But he had an important position within the Church and he should've openly called out the culprits while he had the chance. Would he have paid the ultimate price for doing so? That’s very likely; but the Church has had, and will continue to have, MANY more martyrs who don’t have the name recognition he had.

      Delete
    7. CumExApostolatusOfficio,

      I am a very young novice compared to you.

      Why should Fr Depauw have known Rome wasn't going to return to Catholicism? Many Sedes are waiting for a True Pope and a return to Catholicism and that is 50 yrs after Vatican II. I, however, am not one of them. I personally think it is preposterous.

      Delete
    8. @CumExApostalatusOfficio,
      I've been in the fight 38 years, and I do agree that all is not well with the world. I simply reject the Gnostic "Grand Conspiracy" fiasco. Fr. DePauw was a great priest who was used by God as the first to preserve His One True Church. Many wouldn't have come out (such as Abp. Lefebvre) if it hadn't been for the courage of Fr. DePauw and Bp. Kurz.

      He really didn't come to the sede solution until 1999, at which time he was 81 and not in the best of health. Many people are great "Monday Morning Quarterbacks," saying what others should have done without being in that particular situation. Hindsight is always 20/20. Fr DePauw did the very best he could at the time and under his circumstances.

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    9. Fr. Depauw was a witness to what happened at Vatican II and he knew many of the players. He may not have wanted to believe or think what was happening before his eyes was true, but it was happening, and very few were willing to stand up and take the heat when it was happening. A group of prelates (I don't know if their names were ever made public) wrote a book titled, "The Plot Against the Church" by Maurice Pinay (which was their nome de plume). The book was published shortly before V2 convened. But, the priesthood by the 1950s had been "softened" with priests around the world, but assuredly in Rome and the United States, who were either actual infiltrators (a great many of them were, as Bella Dodd had testified before Congress in the 1950s) or who were more worried about their retirements and creature comforts than the Faith, and therefore, the Truth. The enemies of the Church had fought for 1900 years to take down the Church and they realized it could never be done from the outside, only from the inside.
      Like I said, Fr. DePauw knew his dogma and his canon law, and I don't pretend to place the blame for what has happened on the shoulders of one priest/man, but we needed Catholic heroes in the 1960s and there were none to be found. Of course, the media was utterly controlled by the Church’s enemies by then, so any real reporting on the Church was long over. And the idea of "obedience" to superiors in the hierarchy, including the Pope, had been weaponized by then as well. Obedience to men superseded obedience to Jesus Christ in the minds of many. Even Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani of the Holy Office, after having given his “Intervention” to Pope Paul VI (Montini), after a time relented, and pursued it no further.
      Yes, I too think waiting for a miracle is preposterous. God helps those who help themselves. God will not help the faint of heart. Perhaps you are one of the heroes the Church awaits?

      Delete
    10. @Introibo: My dad had 2 priests who were first cousins. One remained after the changes and served for some time in the U.S. but mainly in Italy. He was an Augustinian. The other wouldn't abide by the changes and was shuttled off to Perth, SW Australia with no parish, where he offered the Latin Mass until he died. I didn't learn about the Latin Mass until the late '80s. My contention, at this point in life, is the buildings should never have been abandoned and left in the hands of the enemy. But like the frog slowly boiling in the pot of water, most people didn't feel anything major was happening; at first all they'd taken away were the smells and bells.., then the Communion rails, the veils, etc., etc.

      Delete
    11. @CumExApostolusOfficio,
      On your last statement I’m in basic agreement. As to Fr DePauw and Bp Kurz, they were indeed heroes. Father and His Excellency tried desperately to get support to stop V2. Of more than 200 bishops who pledged to fight with them NOT ONE STOOD UP.
      That includes Abp Lefebvre, Thuc, and Mendez. When they did come out of hiding, they were not united as Fr tried to do. I’m grateful they did finally wake up, but unfortunately, too late.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    12. CumExApostolatusOfficio,

      Just because I asked a question and voiced an opinion, it is no reason to be sarcastic.

      JoAnn

      Delete
    13. I apologize if I came across as sarcastic. It was not at all my intention. If you are a young(er) person I truly think the situation will get worse, not better, and the Church will need people who understand what has happened and what continues to happen via incrementalism. The Church needs a new group of heroes to take up the fight and perhaps you could fill those shoes. As for Fr. DePauw and Bp Kurz, I had forgotten that no one else had stood with them, and I don't mean to disparage them as individuals. The entire situation is beyond infuriating and if more men had had the required fortitude, we wouldn't find ourselves in this very precarious position. I apologize if I hijacked this conversation. My frustration level is at an all-time high.

      Delete
    14. CumExApostaltusExOfficio, I am not young as I am 65 yrs, just young to Tradition/Sedevacantism. Just wanted to clarify.
      JoAnn

      Delete
    15. Can anyone explain "The Bishop in the Woods" idea as it pertains to Sedevacantism?

      Delete
    16. @anon2:14
      As I have heard it (my readers please correct me if they’ve heard something different), there is a belief that there “must be a bishop somewhere with Ordinary jurisdiction “ even if he’s “hiding in the woods someplace.”

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    17. Sounds like a Santa Claus type figure!

      Delete
    18. @anon4:35
      Indeed! That’s why I treat it like Bigfoot. I don’t believe in it, although it’s not logically impossible. I don’t bother to think about it. If it proves itself real, then I’ll readjust my beliefs accordingly.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  2. Your suggestions for celebrating the Eve of All Saints are the best I've seen anywhere. Thank you.

    You are so right in pointing out that Santa is also a deception. Maybe that jolly happy guy bringing children their hearts desires (materially speaking) was the camel under the tent for bringing in the dark characters we see in almost all "holiday" celebrations now.
    "Miracle on 42nd Street", featuring that cute, precocious, cynical little girl who doesn't "believe" in "SANTA" and finally opens her shrunken little heart and converts to true faith in HIM, brought the twisted hollywood version of the Christmas spirit to millions. The adults around her who effect her "conversion" are well meaning, but dupes and liars - the audience cheering them on in their witless schemes. Her mother, the one who told her the truth, was written as a jaded, cold,career-driven divorcee so she could be construed as a villainess until she sees the light and converts, too. She softens and finds the true "spirit" of Christmas, which allows her to commit to a new relationship through an adulterous "marriage". It actually comes off as an atheistic story at it's base. It is blasphemous.
    MO34St is just one of countless examples of pop culture pieces that have used pure emotion (a very effective tool of the worldlings), to distort reality and lead the public away from the Faith.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jannie,
      That was an excellent analysis of a seemingly innocuous movie! I can’t thank you enough for sharing! I’ve learned much from my readers and many people (including me) have just learned something important from you!

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. Thank you for your kind words, Intro.
      BTW I think I botched the Movie's title in my comment (LOL), but I am glad I made my point!

      It is hard to adjust to letting go of the more "innocent" falsehoods in the culture that shape our worldviews from the time we are kids, when they are placed permanently in our minds in the form of heart tugging and lovely visuals. Friends and family, who often dont know it, can tempt us back to the worldly "club", too and thats the hardest part. It seems this is an age of constant emotional leave-taking for Catholics, for the sake of our God.
      As a 'mostly-melancholic', and an introvert, I need to keep from becoming too gloomy about the state of the world today, while working to remain content and serene in The Lord. Then there's trying to help other people out of the quagmire called the V2 church. I have started to make a little mission out of that. I hope to succeed.

      Thanks for listening.

      Delete
    3. Jannie,
      We all must do our part to proselytize!
      God Bless you in this endeavor!

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  3. I no longer celebrate any Holiday. No birthdays, no Christmas trees, no fireworks for July 4th, no candy for Halloween. No gorging myself at Thanksgiving and no getting drunk at New Year’s Eve. They have all been corrupted by the world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tom,
      I basically agree, but couldn’t you celebrate with family and friends in a TRULY CHRISTIAN WAY??

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. Tom,
      You sound like a Jehovah's Witness. They won't celebrate birthdays, Christmas, etc. I personally try to avoid going to extremes. The truth lies in the middle. The older I get the more that axiom reads true. Try it, you may like it!

      Delete
    3. Tom,

      While it's true the world has corrupted everything, it doesn't mean we should avoid celebrating anything. I think Anonymous 2:16 and Introibo pretty much say there should be a balance.

      I get a lot of flack for not celebrating Halloween but I do celebrate All Saints day and am all for kids dressing up as saints and the like. So if relatives make fun of me or call it strange I just tell them, I could just not celebrate anything if it makes you feel better? The 4th of July is meant to celebrate the U.S. independence from Britain. While the founding fathers started this country on the principles of freemasonry (life, liberty, and fraternity) and while I'm totally against Americanism, secret societies etc. I do recognize that I'm thankful that I at least live in the US instead of somewhere like Iran or China. Blow a firework off for Our lady who is the Patroness of the America and be proud of it. The list can on. When it's my birthday I'm thankful to God that He has given me another year, but I also think of how I'm getting closer to eternity. It's a good meditation and frightening especially if you have a lot of sins to make up for (like myself). Christmas trees are used in Churches during the Christmas season. So why would having a Christmas tree be problematic? Sure people put them up during advent, but so what. Put purple and a slash of pink lights on it if it bothers you. In fact, I did that one year and changed the them when it was Christmas eve. I just changed the lights and put up the star and white lights, ornaments etc. It might seem corny, but my point is don't live a boring life. It's like salt that goes flat and you know what Jesus says about salt going flat. It's good for nothing but to be trodden under foot. Let you light shine before men.

      Be happy and proud that you are Catholic and not in the Novus Ordo anymore.

      Lee

      Delete
    4. I wish I could celebrate in a Christian way, but everyone wants the secular way.

      Delete
    5. @Tom,
      Who cares what everyone wants? YOU celebrate in YOUR WAY in YOUR HOUSE!!

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    6. Tom,
      Just because secularism has tried to hijack the holidays is no reason not to celebrate them in the Christian way. To not celebrate the holidays in a Christian way is letting the secularists win!

      Delete
    7. I observe what were once designated Holy Days of Obligation in the traditional manner of assisting at Mass if able. After that, the modes of celebration are culturally directed. I am the only trad in my family so they all think Dad is a little off to begin with. They do the xmas tree and easter egg baskets, I sit by myself with a glass of scotch.

      Delete
    8. Tom,

      Why have a scotch? A lot of people get drunk off of it and by enjoying it you're being indulgent like most of the secular world and the Christian way is to mortify the senses.

      You see my point? Just like there is nothing wrong with having a scotch once in awhile regardless of how others abuse drinking it, so to should you not worry about the world's secular attitude regarding how it treats holiday celebrations.

      Very funny Introibo about St. Clare of Assisi and the television in the other comments below.

      Lee

      Delete
  4. When people see traditionalists going on extreme diatrides over such as holidays, conspiracy theories such as 911, the moon landing being faked, watching TV, people showing emotions, etc., they assume we are a bunch of wacky nut jobs. I am a Traditionalist and I am turned off by such wacky stuff and the more I am exposed to it, the more it repulses me! I was raised pre-Vatican II and I don't remember the Catholics carrying things to extremes as the Traditionalists do today. I realize it is a reaction to the extremes of Vatican II, however, the answer is not going to extremes in the opposite direction!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon3:43
      You’ll get no disagreement from me!! Holidays and Holy Days should be celebrated; but in a truly Catholic manner. As far as conspiracy theories go, while I recognize that conspiracies are real, the idea that everything is part of a Grand Conspiracy, whereby 9/11 is fake, and the world is flat and only a few enlightened ones can see through it, is Gnostic. I’ve (unfortunately) dealt with many here on this blog, and they are beyond hearing any evidence. They do make us look whacky and discourage conversions.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. @3:43 p.m. Those are good points. Some -- not all ---but some of these weird attitudes like the TV being intrinsically evils originate from Lefebvre's francophone, Jansenistic group called the Society of St. Pius X.

      Delete
    3. @anon8:16
      Someone should remind the SSPX that Pope Pius XII made St Clare of Assisi Patron Saint Of Television and those who work in television industry. You can’t make a patron saint of something intrinsically evil !

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    4. Anon@8:16,
      Interesting about the evils of TV originating from the SSPX!

      Delete
    5. Anon 8:16,
      Why do you state that the SSPX are Jansenistic?

      Delete
    6. You may not like the discussion of conspiracy theories, but you brought it on yourself by denying, based on nothing but your word, conspiracy theories and ridiculing people who believe in them. Since you brought up the topic, don’t be surprised that people join the discussion to correct your errors. It is not gnostic to believe in conspiracies, even a “grand conspiracy,” if sufficient evidence exists to support such beliefs. If you want to avoid the discussion of conspiracy theories, I would suggest you simply say that this blog focuses on religious matters and secular conspiracy theories are beyond the scope of discussion, without taking a stand on such theories or ridiculing conspiracy researchers.

      Delete
    7. @anon4:44
      It’s hard to prove a negative. That’s why the accused in a criminal trial need not “prove you did NOT commit murder.” It’s an old axiom that “he who asserts must prove.” You must prove a Grand Conspiracy, I need not to disprove it.

      You can never reason with Grand Conspiracy Theorists because whatever evidence you may offer to counter their evidence will be dismissed as “a falsehood of the Grand Conspiracy.”

      Finally, the Grand Conspiracy Theory has religious implications. I personally knew someone who for a time became an atheist because he thought Jesus Christ was part of a Jewish Conspiracy to weaken the Roman Empire by teaching them to “turn the other cheek,” etc.

      Hence, my position which I take and willnot retract.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  5. All of Catholic prophecy points to a restoration of Holy Mother Church way before end times. Like Job, Holy Mother Church will be restored! This is not preposterous.
    Birthdays do not have to be self-Indulgent, in many formerly Catholic countries, the person celebrating the birthday invites his family and friends, not the other way around. And what a wonderful day to give thanks to the Adorable Blessed Trinity for our creation, redemption and ongoing (hopefully) sanctification.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In past times the average peasant did not know his or her actual birthday, but since they were named after a Saint, they would celebrate their Name Day. Others would celebrate their Baptismal Day. But now all is focused on self so naturally birthdays are now in vogue.

      Delete
    2. Anon @12:22 - What Catholic prophecies? Please explain. I didn't realize that prophecies were included in doctrine/dogma.
      JoAnn

      Delete
    3. Tom A,

      We celebrate Our Lord's Nativity (Dec. 25th), the Blessed Virgin's Nativity (Sept. 8th) and St. John the Baptist's Nativity (June 24th). Birthday's are important because God brings us into this world to do His Will. If it is wrong to celebrate birthdays than I'm sure the Church would have said something by now if it wanted to condemn it. Satanists pervert everything, so just because they self indulge on their birthdays and make that the most evil day of the year doesn't mean that celebrating birthdays is bad. I'm not saying you're saying it's bad, but because you don't celebrate it or anything else, you write in such a way as to discourage it because of something that you think makes it bad or distasteful.

      Anybody can do that with anything. For example: I see all kinds of blasphemous crucifixes either at the Novus Ordo Catholic bookstore, Churches themselves, or among other places. It doesn't mean I should not hang a crucifix up in my house just because there are so many theologically incorrect or blasphemous ones lurking out there or because of the Novus Ordo ruining it for everybody else.

      Lee

      Delete
    4. Its childish to draw attention to yourself just because you lived another year.

      Delete
    5. @12:22a.m. Catholic prophecies one is not obliged to believe in (i.e. Fatima, Lourdes, etc. etc.), but SACRED SCRIPTURE you ARE OBLIGED TO BELIEVE IN. That having been stated, point to one place...just ONE, where in discussing a Great Apostasy, there is talk of a "restoration" after the Great Apostasy. Use your Bible---that dusty, untouched book on your shelf and good luck answering this question.

      Delete
    6. Tom A.

      It's not childish to celebrate birthdays (most people don't make a big deal of it, especially the older they get), nor is it wrong to celebrate holidays in a Catholic fashion despite how the world does it. If you want to sit by yourself and have a scotch because the world has ruined things the way you wished it could be, then you go right ahead.

      Lee

      Delete
  6. St. Catherine of SiennaSeptember 27, 2019 at 9:35 PM

    Matthew chapter 8:1-5 says "[1] At that hour the disciples came to Jesus, saying: Who thinkest thou is the greater in the kingdom of heaven? [2] And Jesus calling unto him a little child, set him in the midst of them, [3] And said: Amen I say to you, unless you be converted, and become as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. [4] Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, he is the greater in the kingdom of heaven. [5] And he that shall receive one such little child in my name, receiveth me.

    How many little children do you know that would NOT want to celebrate their birthday?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @StCatherine,
      An excellent observation!

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  7. Tom,
    Don't go down the road of self-annihilation. The reality of today's culture is all about self, self, self, I realize that. However,taking the opposite extreme is dangerous and leads to self-annihilation. As always, the truth lies in the middle. The Bible tells us to "Love our neighbor as OURSELF". A healthy self-love is what to aim for as going to extremes in either direction is determintal and not what God intended.
    JoAnn

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joann,
      I echo your sentiments to Tom!

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. I always buy presents for those in my small family on both birthdays and Christmas. I don't resent buying presents, I really like to shop and give to others. However, people in my family have been complaining and resentful about having to buy presents and spending their money on holiday presents for others. As a result of their selfish attitude they have ruined the holidays for me. Anybody with any thoughts as to what I should do? My first reaction is to quit buying and celebrating if they won't reciprocate and quit their selfishness.

      Delete
  8. The Church is to be visible, with a hierarchy. It is to be one, holy, Catholic and apostolic.
    Where do I tell a new person to Tradition to find the Church? Is it the CMRI, the SSPX, the SSPV? Please don't tell me it is about finding the Faith, not the Church, as that is Protestantism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon6:31
      As theologians Dorsch and Berry point out, the Church Of Christ exists in an extended interregnum in a perfect YET INCOMPLETE WAY. The Church hierarchy consists of those bishops with valid orders who keep the faith and reject Vatican II. The SSPX is not preferred (or any R&R) as they do not have the proper teaching on the Vacancy. Since it is not dogma, they may, in my opinion, be approached for the Mass and Sacraments if no Sedevacantist chapel or Church is available.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. Is there unity among any of those groups? I was under the impression they each disagreed on various matters like Protestantism. Can you definitively point to one group and say it is the Church?

      Delete
    3. Yes. They are unified in the basics of the Faith. They may disagree on disputed points that only came about as a result of the Great Apostasy (e.g. are Thuc consecrations valid, etc.) These are not essentials of the Faith. I could point to SSPV and CMRI and say there is the remnant Church.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    4. One thing is certain, the NO V2 sect is not one, nor is it holy, and probably no longer apostolic.

      Delete
    5. Tom,
      It has NONE of the Four Marks!

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    6. The Novus Ordo Marks are One divided, unholy, non-catholic, and apostate Church.

      Lee

      Delete
  9. Introibo,

    Is there a way I can contact you via email exchange in private if I have a question I don't want to make public or is this blog only meant for public use? I don't have any questions at the moment but I might in the future.

    Lee

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lee,
      You can send me your personal email via the comments. I will not publish it. I will then contact you via a private email that protects my identity. It will have “Hello from Introibo” in the subject line.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. Joann,
      If you can go to another place for therapy, that would be best. You may continue there there if you have no place else to go causing grave inconvenience.

      It's so sad that perversion is so rampant.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    4. Perversion is so rampant due to homo friendly imposter “Popes” and Vatican II which turned the culture Nihilistic. The rate at which the LGBT community is increasing and being accepted, especially by the young, the heterosexuals are going to be the minority in a few years!
      JoAnn

      Delete
    5. Joann,
      You speak the truth. I get comments from young men complaining of how hard it is to find a woman under the age of 30 who is not lesbian, bisexual, or sees nothing wrong with "experimenting." I'm sure young ladies have it hard with men under 30 being perverts as well.

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    6. My 25 yr old niece just told everyone she has a "girlfriend."
      Utterly depressing.

      Delete
    7. @anon5:27
      My prayers and sympathy.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  10. Off the top of my head, I name Anna Maria Taigi and Mother Mariana de Torres in Quito, because many of their prophecies have been fulfilled. Anna Maria Taigi had a miraculous orb where she could see future events. She had the support of the Church. There is a tremendous book about her, called Anna Maria Taigi: Wife, Mother and Mystic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon @12:32
      Please read 2 Thessolonians Chapter 2 and Revelation. These are the only prophecies I believe in as they are biblical.
      JoAnn

      Delete
  11. Do we follow fast and abstinence for All Hallows Eve?

    ReplyDelete