Monday, July 27, 2020

Calumniating The King

I admit that controlling my anger has always been a problem for me. It's a sin for which I've gone to confession, done penance, prayed much, and have greatly improved diminishing since I was a total hot-headed teenager. Even my friends from law school compliment me on how much I've mellowed out. However, I must acknowledge that my blood was boiling this past June 27th when "Black Lives Matter"("BLM") Communists attempted to illegally destroy the statue of my Patron Saint, the great King St. Louis IX of France (1214-1270). St. Louis, Missouri is named in his honor. The city has a statue of the king in Forest Park, known as the "Apotheosis of St. Louis," the formal name of the iconic statue. About two hundred (200) people gathered, with the Black Communist thugs screaming, "Take it down," while a small band of "conservative" Vatican II sect members (lead by a couple of their clergy) prayed the Rosary in front of the statue to protect it. At least one BLM man was arrested and charged with assaulting one member of the peaceful prayer group. (See https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/man-charged-with-assault-at-protest-over-king-louis-ix-statue-in-forest-park/article_0370d4b4-868f-5bf3-b263-dd78aa0de417.html).

There were other skirmishes, including other peaceful protesters being hit and even some reports of them being spat upon by BLM. (See, e.g., https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2020/june/attack-catholics-praying-elderly-man-who-were-protecting-king-louis-ix-statue). Why the anger over the French King? Two charges: (1) antisemitism and (2) racism/"Islamophobia." In this post I will present the life and virtues of King St. Louis, expose the damnable lies leveled against him, and demonstrate the evil of his detractors. My sources on King St. Louis are:
  • Louis IX: Most Christian King of France, [1968] by Margaret Wade Lebarge
  • Saint Louis: Crusader King of France, [English edition; 1992] by Jean Richard
  • Saint Louis, [2009] by Jacques LeGoff

King St. Louis IX: Quintessential Catholic Monarch
St. Louis IX, King of France, was born at Poissy on April 25, 1214. He often referred to himself as "Louis de Poissy" because he considered his true birth to have been in the place where he was baptized as a member of Christ's One True Church. He was one of ten children born to King Louis VIII (reigned 1223–1226) and Queen Blanche of Castile (lived from 1188–1252). He was their second son, but when his older brother Philip died in 1218 at the age of nine, Louis became Crown Prince (i.e., male heir with the right to inherit the throne) at the age of four. 

King Louis VIII died at the age of thirty-eight, when St Louis was only twelve years old. The young child received coronation as King Louis IX, but the boy-King was unable to rule under the French law, promulgated by past kings, decreeing that no one may exercise kingly authority until age 21. His extremely devout  and pious mother, Queen Blanche, became Regent of France which meant that she could rule France by making binding decisions in the name of her son until he was old enough to rule on his own. She was the de facto ruler of France from 1226-1235, making her the most powerful woman in Europe, if not the entire world at that time. She was a brilliant woman, and made many shrewd alliances and deals with other nobility, ensuring that her son would rule over an even more powerful France. 

The greatest thing Queen Blanche did, and indeed, the greatest thing any mother could do, was to impart to her royal son the knowledge and love of the Catholic Faith. St. Louis himself gave credit to his mother for instilling his love of the Church. The Queen told him, "I love you, my dear son, as much as a mother can love her child, but I would rather see you dead at my feet than that you should ever commit a mortal sin." The saint said at the end of his life he always remembered those words and lived by them.

In 1234, at the age of twenty, the saint married Margaret de Provence, a woman described as "fair of face, but fairer of faith." It was important to the King that his Queen should be as devout as he was in the practice of the Faith. He was not disappointed in his Queen. He often would say that his life was guided by the motto, "All for Christ, All for France, All for Margaret." He ascended to the Royal Throne on April 25, 1235 assuming all powers of an absolute monarch. His mother went from being Queen-Regent to Queen-Mother, a figurehead with no authority, but who continued to exert great influence over her son. 

King St. Louis IX: Seeking First the Kingdom of God
While "power corrupts" is a truism in most cases, it did not apply to St. Louis. Upon receiving full power as monarch, Louis set about achieving his personal goal of making France the foremost Catholic kingdom. It began with his prayer life and holy example. He recited the Divine Office daily, and attended the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass twice each day. Once when reproached by one the nobles that he "spent too much time with praying" and didn't give enough attention to matters of government, the justly angry King told him, "If I spent my time idly, by hunting and other pleasures of royalty, no one would object. You dare to upbraid me for seeking first the Kingdom of God?" The noble was speechless. 

The virtuous King often abandoned royal garb for a hair-shirt to do penance, and would sleep on the floor many nights. His devotion to the Most Holy Sacrifice was legendary. Saint Louis would genuflect during the Nicene Creed at Mass to show reverence to the incarnation of Christ, "the greatest event in human history" at the words,"ET INCARNATUS EST DE SPIRITU SANCTO EX MARIA VIRGINE: ET HOMO FACTUS EST." ("AND BECAME INCARNATE BY THE HOLY GHOST OF THE VIRGIN MARY: AND WAS MADE MAN."). This pious practice was quickly emulated by his subjects, and even began to be practiced outside France. Rome responded by making the practice, an incentive to piety, part of the actual rubrics. Think of King St. Louis the next time you genuflect at the Credo during Mass!

The King and Queen had eleven children from their holy marriage; six sons and five daughters. He recognized that his most solemn duty as a father was to instill in his children the same love of Christ and His One True Church that he had. He would teach them their catechism and go to Mass with them. He made praying with them a priority. It is believed he never told a lie and never broke a promise.

 The Latin emperor of Constantinople gave St. Louis the Crown of Thorns in 1238, and the saint built the magnificent Sainte Chapelle to house this relic of Christ's crucifixion. King St. Louis is often depicted holding the Crown of Thorns. He built many churches, encouraged vocations, and protected all religious orders. 

King St. Louis IX: Giving Alms to the Poor and Enforcer of Catholic Morals
The King had a great love for the poor, and would invite numerous serfs into his castle to eat with him. He would often disguise himself as a beggar and circulate among the common folks to ask what they thought of the King. He would take to heart any complaints and seek to rectify them. He abolished prostitution and made sure those women who were caught up in such sinful living were given the ability to turn from sin and make living wages doing something useful. He made blasphemy punishable by being branded on the lips. When the pope told him he thought the penalty to be too severe, the saint replied that he subjected himself to the laws he promulgated and would gladly have his own lips branded if he spoke a blasphemy, so as to rid France of that sin. Out of respect for the pope, he mitigated the penalty to several months in a dungeon.

King St. Louis abolished usury, and in 1240 had all copies of the blasphemous Talmud publicly burned in Paris. The Jews were hated for charging interest on money, and the King had them wear an identifying badge to warn the people and hope for their conversion. He gave strict orders that no Jew was to be harmed under any pretext. More than once he served as a godfather for the baptism of a converted Jew. All false religions were banned from public worship, and only the Catholic Faith, the religion of the State, could be practiced in public and proselytize. The King made two incredible legal reforms; he abolished the so-called "trial by ordeal," a judicial practice by which the guilt or innocence of the accused was determined by subjecting them to a dangerous experience and predicated on the belief God would save the innocent by a miracle. The saint rightly concluded this was a form of tempting God to "show me a miracle and prove Thou art Just." He also introduced the presumption of innocence. This was done in response to the wealthy accusing the poor of crimes and demanding they prove themselves innocent when they were uneducated and couldn't afford help. Now all were presumed innocent and the burden of proof was on the accuser to prove guilt. 

King St. Louis IX: Crusader for Christ
When he fell violently ill, the King made a vow to go on a Crusade in the Holy Land to save the Catholics from the savage Mohammedans. St. Louis’s first Crusade (The Seventh Crusade;1248–1250) was a response to the conquest of Christian-controlled Jerusalem by a Turkish and Egyptian force in 1244. After the Holy City was taken, the victors massacred the Christian inhabitants and desecrated the churches. The King's Crusade was set to punish Egypt for that attack and ultimately restore Jerusalem to its Christian king. It failed. Louis’s army was defeated, and he was thrown into prison. 

St. Louis negotiated a deal for his release in exchange for the payment of a heavy ransom. When Turan Shah received half payment from Queen Margaret, he released the King. His advisors begged him to leave Egypt and not pay the remaining half of the ransom, but the virtuous king refused because he had given his solemn promise, and remained until the full debt was paid. 

King St. Louis IX: Rooting out Corruption in the Church
It was precisely because the King loved the Church so much, that he would rebuke and stand against any cleric who stepped beyond their spiritual power and acted like they were starved for glory and temporal power. A group of bishops met with King St Louis to demand that he take their side against some nobles in a dispute because they were clerics. The saint (literally) laughed in their faces and said that he would side with those whom he believed to be morally right, which in this case was the nobles, and they should not use their position as bishops to attempt to further a cause in which they were clearly wrong.

When certain bishops were excommunicating their subjects for the slightest reason to keep them in line, St. Louis did not hesitate to publicly admonish them for devaluing the punishment to the point that it wouldn't have the medicinal effect of meaning much and causing people to amend their ways. 

King St. Louis IX: Banishing the Disease of Heresy
The King kept company with St. Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas, whose mind never stopped thinking, was dining with St. Louis, when the Angelic Doctor stood up, pounded the table and said, "That's the argument to defeat the Albigensian heretics!" The King's guards came to admonish St. Thomas, but the good King told them to immediately bring St. Thomas something to write with so he would not forget his argument. 

The King would often compare heresy to disease and would do all in his power to extirpate it. This analogy of heresy to disease was even contained in the bull of his canonization:

He [Louis] abhorred those who were infected with the macula of perversion [i.e., heresy]. So that they would not infect the adepts of the Christian faith with the rot of this contagious disease, he hunted it out with efficient efforts beyond the boarders of his kingdom, and by exercising his attentive, preventative concerns for the condition of his kingdom, he cast these ferments out of it and allowed the True Faith to shine there in its authentic state.  

King St. Louis IX: A Man of Strong Faith
It is related that in the King's private chapel, a miracle took place when he was not there. When the priest consecrated the Host, it had turned into a visible Christ Child! One of his good and faithful servants ran to the King to tell him what happened, and come and see for himself before the miracle ended. The saintly King just hung his head, deep in thought. His servant couldn't understand his reaction. "Does not your Majesty wish to come and see the Infant Jesus?" He lifted his head and replied, "No, my good man. With the eyes of Faith, I see the Infant Jesus in the Host every day at Mass. Go, and call those who do not believe to witness it. As for me, I believe He is there every day, as the Church teaches." King St. Louis IX truly lived the words of Our Lord, "Jesus saith to him: 'Because thou hast seen me, Thomas, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and have believed.'" (St. John 20:29). 

King St. Louis IX: Living in Sedevacantism
Upon the death of Pope Clement IV on November 29, 1268, until the election of Pope Gregory X on September 1, 1271 was a long interregnum. The King lived approximately the last year and nine months of his life with no pope on the throne of St. Peter. This never prevented him from living and dying as a true Catholic; in a certain sense, he is a saint for our unique time of near universal apostasy. He never lost the faith, and our prayers to him will ensure his most powerful intercession that we keep the Integral Catholic faith as Traditionalists.  


King St. Louis IX: Dying as he Lived--A Devout Catholic who Loved Our Lord and Our Lady
The rise of the Mamluk general Baybars and his merciless campaign of terror against the Christians in the Holy Land prompted Louis to take the cross a second time. St. Louis was in his fifties, and it had been twenty years since he first left on his first Crusade. The Crusade was a disaster from the start and ended with St. Louis contracting a fatal disease.  He composed a letter to his son, Crown Prince Philip who would become King Philip III, aka Philip the Bold. Here is just part of what St.Louis wrote to him:

Fair son, the first thing I would teach thee is to set thine heart to love God; for unless he love God none can be saved. Keep thyself from doing aught that is displeasing to God, that is to say, from mortal sin. Contrariwise thou shouldst suffer every manner of torment rather than commit a mortal sin.

If God send thee adversity, receive it in patience and give thanks to our Saviour and bethink thee that thou hast deserved it, and that He will make it turn to thine advantage. If He send thee prosperity, then thank Him humbly, so that thou becomest not worse from pride or any other cause, when thou oughtest to be better. For we should not fight against God with his own gifts.

Confess thyself often and choose for thy confessor a right worthy man who knows how to teach thee what to do, and what not to do; and bear thyself in such sort that thy confessor and thy friends shall dare to reprove thee for thy misdoings. Listen to the services of Holy Church devoutly, and without chattering; and pray to God with thy heart and with thy lips, and especially at Mass when the consecration takes place. Let thy heart be tender and full of pity toward those who are poor, miserable, and afflicted, and comfort and help them to the utmost of thy power.

Worn out from toil and sickness, King Louis IX received the Last Rites, and while praising Jesus and Mary, gave forth his soul to God at the age of 56 on August 25, 1270. He was infallibly canonized and enrolled among the saints of the Church by Pope Boniface VIII on August 11, 1297--almost exactly 27 years after his holy death. His feast day is kept on the day he entered Heaven, August 25th. 

Exposing the Calumnies of the King's Evil Enemies

The Jews and the Mohammedans hate King St. Louis IX. That these enemies of Christ should hate one of His saints and cast aspersions upon him should come as no surprise. The Times of Israel happily reports:
Umar Lee, who started a petition for the city [St. Louis] to remove the statue and change the city’s name, organized the anti-statue rally. The petition, which had 849 signatures as of Sunday evening, says Louis IX was “a rabid anti-semite who spearheaded many persecutions against the Jewish people,” as well as “vehemently Islamophobic.” (See https://www.timesofisrael.com/st-louis-archdiocese-defends-statue-of-king-louis-ix-who-persecuted-jews/amp/). 

Southern Jewish Life reports that Lee is also planning to ask Pope (sic) Francis to decanonize (!) Louis IX. (See sjlmag.com/2020/06/missouri-activists-shine-light-on.html?m=1. And leave it to Bergoglio to do something so invalid and evil). The Vatican II sect happily joins forces with Jews and Mohammedans because the Modernists are just as wicked. The Vatican II sect's Archdiocese of St. Louis gave a lackluster defense of the saint, and there was no official effort on the part of any cleric from Bergoglio on down to denounce BLM and counter the petition. The Jesuit rag America denounces the great saint in an article written by one Eve Tushnet, entitled "Don't Hide From the Sins of St. Louis." Tushnet is a Jewish convert to the Vatican II sect and sodomite. She is the author of Gay and Catholic: Accepting My Sexuality. (I'd love to write a book, Vegetarian and Eating Meat: Accepting My Diet and Self-Contradictions). 

Tushmet denounces King St. Louis IX for his "antisemitism;" most notably burning the Talmud. She writes, If there is one thing a church (sic) facing a catastrophic sexual abuse crisis needs, it is willingness to admit the sins of our heroes. If our first instinct is to defend "the church," not to defend the truth or the victims, have we really learned the lessons of the abuse crisis? (See https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2020/07/06/dont-hide-sins-st-louis). This is sheer blasphemy and lies. That King St. Louis was imperfect, conceded; that he was antisemitic denied. Likewise, he was neither racist nor "Islamophobic" (a made up word that labels anyone who spurns that diabolic sect as "mentally ill" by having an "irrational fear" ). The lesson of the abuse crisis is that the Modernists allowed sexual perverts (like Tushmet) into the seminaries after Vatican II and Communists sent thousands of sodomites into the seminaries to infiltrate the Church. To claim that correctly declaring the truth about the heroic virtues of King St. Louis and refusing to impute to him made-up sins is somehow analogous to the Vatican II sect covering up for pederasts is just plain madness. 

Here's an examination of the charges against the saint, and proof of their falsehood. 

King St. Louis and the Jews
  • It was the interest-charging Jews who were evil for imposing usury. To warn the people against borrowing money from them, they wore a badge, and this also served to protect them against violence by royal decree.
  • The King wanted their conversion and was godfather to several converted Jews
  • The Talmud deserved to be burned because it is a blasphemous, evil book.
Proof of the Talmud's evil:
THE TALMUD gets its name from the word LAMUD — taught, and means The Teaching. By metonymy it is taken to mean the book which contains the Teaching, which teaching is called Talmud, that is, the doctrinal book which alone fully expounds and explains all the knowledge and teaching of the Jewish people. For nearly five hundred years after the Babylonian Talmud was completed, the study of literature was greatly hampered partly due to public calamities and partly owing to dissensions among the scholars. But in the eleventh century others wrote further additions to the Talmud. Chief among these were the Tosephoth of Rabbi Ascher.

Besides these there appeared the Perusch of Rabbi Moische ben Maimon, called by the Jews Rambam for short, by the Christians Maimonides, and by Rabbi Schelomo, Iarchi or Raschi.

Thus, the Mischna, Gemarah, Tosephoth, the marginal notes of Rabbi Ascher, the Piske Tosephoth and the Perusch Hamischnaioth of Maimonides, all collected into one, constitute a vast work which is called the Talmud.

The Talmud teaches that Jesus Christ was illegitimate and was conceived during menstruation; that he had the soul of Esau; that he was a fool, a conjurer, a seducer; that he was crucified, buried in hell and set up as an idol ever since by his followers.

In the Tract Sanhedrin (103a) the words of Psalm XCI, 10: 'No plague shall come near thy dwelling,' are explained as follows:

"That thou mayest never have a son or a disciple who will salt his food so much that he destroys his taste in public, like Jesus the Nazarene."

To salt one's food too much or to destroy one's taste, is proverbially said of one who corrupts his morals or dishonors himself, or who falls into heresy and idolatry and openly preaches it to others.

In the same book Sanhedrin (107b) we read:

"Mar said: Jesus seduced, corrupted and destroyed Israel."

 it is explained why animals must not be allowed in the barns of Gentiles, and why Jews are not permitted to have sexual intercourse with them:

"Animals must not be allowed to go near the Goim, because they are suspected of having intercourse with them. Nor must women cohabit with them because they are over-sexed."

In fol. 22b of the same book the reason is given why animals especially of the feminine sex must be kept away from their women:

"...because when Gentile men come to their neighbors' houses to commit adultery with their wives and do not find them at home, they fornicate with the sheep in the barns instead. And sometimes even when their neighbors' wives are at home, they prefer to fornicate with the animals; for they love the sheep of the Israelites more than their own women." (See The Talmud Unmasked:The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians, by theologian Pranaitis [1892], available in full online at http://www.talmudunmasked.com/index.htm). 

King St. Louis and the Mohammedans
The Crusades of St. Louis were not done out of hatred for a person's race, but for the protection of Christians and the conversion of those "still in the darkness of idolatry or Islamism" (Prayer for the Consecration of the Human Race to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus). St. Louis' biographer LeGoff, relates that when in Egypt, the saint met the Sultan of Babylon. Through an interpreter they spoke. The King said he was sad. The Sultan asked why and St Louis responded, "It is because I have not won the thing I wanted to win the most, for which I left my sweet country of France..." "What is that?" the Sultan asked. "It is your soul," said King St. Louis. He explained how the Sultan and the Mohammedans could only be saved by Jesus Christ and His Church. The Sultan responded, "In following the law of the most blessed Mohammed we hope to one day come to enjoy the greatest pleasures in the afterlife." The King (no ecumenist!) immediately replied, "That is why I can only be thoroughly astonished that you men who are discreet and circumspect give your faith to that sorcerer Mohammed who commands  and allows so many dishonest things. I have actually looked at and examined the Koran, and I have only seen filth and impurities in it..." The sultan was so moved, he began to sob at the concern St. Louis had, as he pleaded for the conversion of the Moslems. (See LeGoff, pgs. 647-648). 

Proof that the Koran teaches wickedness:
 The Koran is an evil book written under demonic inspiration. Strong words? I own a copy. Here's what it teaches:

"O ye who believe!  Fight the unbelievers who gird you about, and let them find firmness in you; and know that Allah is with those who fear Him."  (Sura IX 123) Islam spread by means of violence. Catholicism spread by being persecuted and loving Her enemies along the way.

"They do blaspheme who say: 'Allah is Christ the son of Mary.'  But said Christ: 'O Children of Israel!  Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.'  Whoever joins other gods with Allah, Allah will forbid him the Garden, and the Fire will be his abode.  There will for the wrong-doers be no one to help."  (Sura V 75) Islam says Christians go to Hell, and Christ is not Divine; He allegedly told others to worship the false moon "god" Allah.

"O ye who believe!  Take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors:  They are but friends and protectors to each other.  And he amongst you that turns to them (For friendship) is of them.  Verily Allah guided not a people unjust."  (Sura V 54) Mohammedans are told not to have Christians or Jews as friends.

Also taught:
Women are inferior to men (Sura IV 34)
Men can, and even should, beat their wives in some circumstances (Sura IV 34)
Allah does not love the unbelievers (Sura III 32)

The Modernists' and liberals' conundrum: If you support Islam, which supports the inferiority of women and approves of them being beaten, doesn't that make you a misogynist? But if you condemn Islam for being misogynistic and not a "religion of peace," doesn't that make you "Islamophobic"? 

Conclusion
Now it can be seen why BLM, the Jews, Mohammedans, and Modernists despise and spread lies about King St. Louis IX. He is the embodiment of everything they hate. Here is a layman with a large family who puts God first. He believed there is only One True Church to which all must belong if they are to be saved. He didn't believe in ecumenism, that Moslems worship the same God as Catholics, and he did believe the Jews were the Deicide race who also need conversion because proselytism is not "solemn nonsense." He did not believe in separation of Church and State, or religious liberty, but that every State must be a Catholic State. He lived a life of heroic virtue, realizing that power and money are to be used in the service of God, and any other use is folly. He was solidly Catholic and proud of it; the model Christian ruler and knight, who with supreme valor, upheld all that was good, true, and beautiful. Where is any of this in our politicians of today? The enemies of King St. Louis IX hate the King of kings Whom he served so well. This is all the more reason to honor and emulate him!

The Collect from the Mass in honor of King St. Louis IX, Confessor: "O God, Who didst translate Blessed Louis, Thy Confessor, from an earthly throne to the glory of Thy Heavenly Kingdom, grant, we beseech Thee, through his merits and intercession, that we may have companionship with the King of kings, Jesus Christ, Thy Son, Who with Thee liveth and reigneth in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world without end. Amen."


67 comments:

  1. May God be blessed to have given France such a great king ! Our countries would need leaders like him ! Shame on the little filthy people who throw mud at him !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Simon,
      The wicked always seek to defame the good and noble! King St Louis IX, ora pro nobis!

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  2. Excellent! I love it! King St. Louis IX pray for us.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Saddlery Tack,
      We need his prayers more than ever, my friend!

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  3. "The King had a great love for the poor, and would invite numerous surfs into his castle to eat with him."

    Surfs should be serfs.

    "When the pope told him he thought the penalty to be too severe, the saint replied that he subjected himself *the* the laws he promulgated and would gladly have his own lips branded if he spoke a blasphemy, so as to rid France of that sin."

    The should be 'to', I think.

    A moving picture and defense of a saintly king, Introibo.

    I'm sure some Americans of the conservative bent look at those defending his name and statue with a strange glances, given our country's historical antipathy for human monarchy in general. Yet Louis IX is a sterling example of why St. Robert Bellarmine spent the first part of De Romano Pontificate arguing that of the three fundamental forms of human government - monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy - monarchy was ideally and logically the best of them all.

    For it is easier to find one good man than many; a monarch who has no earthly superior in his realm is not compelled to envy as easily as aristocratic equals; a monarch who knows that he is the linchpin of government is compelled to neglect nothing; and so on.

    History is replete with stories of tyrannical monarchs, it is true; however, monarchy is not intrinsically tyrannical, as there have been many just and moral monarchs beyond Louis IX. Furthermore, once they perish, their tyranny ends with them (and must be taken up by another if it is to continue).

    But if an aristocracy is tyrannical, there are more heads to the proverbial beast. If a democracy is tyrannical - if a society has a whole has abandoned itself to vice and chaos - then what would say those who decry tyranny on the one hand yet magnify on the other "the Will of the People" as though it were an idol?

    The harshest and cruelest kings and emperors in history could not hold a candle to the terrors and bloodletting of the 20th century societies found in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia.

    Nor has any king - including the much vilified King George III - ever had as much blood on their hands as American democracy with legalized abortion.

    And as early look at the chaos gripping many Democrat-run cities these past months, one can't help but wonder: what would King Louis do?

    His answer, apparently, would be another question: what would Jesus do?

    Long live the King!

    Sincerely,

    A Simple Man

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know that the Church teaches that uncondemned forms of governments are equally holy.

      But one can't help but notice that abolishing monarchies has not only gave bloodbaths, but a diminishing of the Church's power, or of a nation turning insane and anti-Catholic.

      Abolishment of the French monarchy in the French Revolution led to bloodbath, removal of a lot of the power of the Church, and the rise of Robespear's "Cult of the Supreme Being". And France is one of the nations that separated Church and State, (which is one of the stupidest things a nation could do), even before Vatican II. For example, Spain only removed Catholicism as its state religion by the direction of the Vatican after the Second Vatican Council.

      Abolishment of Russian monarchy led to the establishment of the Soviet Union, rise of communism, and bloodbath.

      And as Churchill said, the abolishment of the German monarchy is responsible for fascist Hitler's rise to power, and bloodbath that followed.

      These last two ideologies, communism and fascism, condemned by the Church.

      Delete
    2. Simple Man,
      I echo your sentiments. How far we have fallen from days of a pope on the Throne of St Peter and Catholic Monarchs on the Throne of truly Catholic nations.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    3. I know this is unrelated to the post, but actually, I believe that when people think of monarchy, the reason they are against it immediately is because they think all monarchies are absolute monarchies.

      Of the current 44 sovereign states (about 1/4 of all countries) whose governments are monarchies, absolute monarchies are only a minority.

      Delete
    4. @anon9:20
      Yes, I think a Catholic monarchy overall works best. The examples you give are excellent!

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    5. There was a photo of "Pope" Francis and King Filipe VI of Spain meeting, and the description states that they are the last two Catholic monarchs in Europe.

      It would have been a relief that there are at least two Catholic monarchs today, but, one can't help but sigh. There really are no Catholic monarchs today.

      There's even no officialy Catholic countries today. There are some countries that have the current Novus Ordo Church as official state religion, but it looks like they forgot that their very own state religion is against a country having a state religion!

      Delete
    6. @anon9:26
      You are correct. There are a few States where the Vatican II sect is the official religion, but that is not Catholicism. Those countries, including the now Modernist Vatican City, only pay lip service to the sect. A statue of Martin Luther is there which was unthinkable under a true pope. What it really means to be a Catholic country isn’t even enforced there. As you rightly point out, if they did, they would (ironically) be violating official “Catholic” teaching. More Victims of Vatican II.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  4. Wow!!! What a saint and no wonder BLM, the Jews, Mohammedans, and Modernists hate him so much. Makes me love him that much more. Thank you for the great article. I learned a lot.

    Lee

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lee,
      My hope is to spread devotion to my Patron Saint, so often neglected and much maligned. We can all learn from his example!

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. I know you probably have a bunch of topics to write about in the future, but if you ever want to write about another saint feel free to do so. Writing about St. Louis made my day and helped my mind shift from thinking about the current problems with the world. Blessed be God in His angels and in His saints.

      Lee

      Delete
    3. Lee,
      Thank you! I will consider future posts on Saints!

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  5. Introibo, I have a small question about France's monarchy. Does their use of *male-only* primogeniture have anything to do with religion?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon9:26
      No. It was based on the premise that those who fought the wars to defend the country were men (knights). The monarch must be the leader of those who fight and chivalrous. Therefore, only men were chosen by primogeniture. At certain times, women could (and did) rule, as in the case of Queen Blanche when she was Queen-Regent, and Queen Margaret, when King St Louis IX was fighting in the Crusades.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  6. "Conservatives" from the Vatican II sect. Imagine that, rosary reciting Novus Ordo losers came to defend St. Louis. Where were all the Sedevacantists?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brian,
      Perhaps they were there, not just formally with a group. The most important question is “Where was ‘Pope’ Francis?” He is your “Vicar of Christ on Earth” and Rule of Faith, is he not? St. Louis is a saint of the Catholic Church, right? Where was his condemnation of the BLM Communists? I must have missed it. Where was his condemnation of those asking for a repeal of an infallible canonization? That one slipped by me too.

      Maybe he was busy reading Nostra Aetate, “ The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth,”

      And I’m glad to see two Vatican II sect “priests” were there. Living proof there are still some not in prison!

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. I remember when John Paul II came there in 1999. He must have cursed the place for the new millennium.

      Lee

      Delete
    3. Lee,
      He paved the way for the ultimate curse: Jorge Bergoglio!!

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  7. The Jesuit America mag complain against St Louis is pure hypocrisy. The King would have castrated those pedo monsters, while they miss their brains in their modernist travel of accompaniment, tenderness, and receiving the monster with a contemplative gaze.
    - Poni

    ReplyDelete
  8. Francis the fake will surely appease BLM and issue a fake de-canonization of St. Louis. Hardly anything anymore is about the truth but about subverting the truth to appease and bow down and apologize to BLM and it's Marxist Agenda. Francis is always eating, drinking and praising every fake religion under the sun and constantly disparaging Tradition and the Latin Mass. Perhaps a statute of the Apostate "St. John Paul II" kissing the Koran will be erected in place of the statute of the real Saint Louis?? Unfortunate, but par for the course for the Vatican II sect and it's lies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joann,
      Wojtyla kissing the Koran is the perfect statue for the diabolical V2 sect!

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  9. Introibo,

    Maybe I'm thinking too much, but is St. Thomas Aquinas really that type pf person to pound a table while dining with a king?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon9:20
      The account is attested to by more than one historical source, but could it be apocryphal or exaggerated? Sure. However, it does to me seem to be in line with a great intellect. Someone super-intelligent like the Angelic Doctor, can think on multiple topics; their mind seemingly all over the place. If he finally thought of an argument to overcome the Albigensian heresy, in his exuberance, he might pound the table with an “ah hah!” Moment.

      Nevertheless, it is true they dined together and were friends. It certainly is not some “dogma” or fact of history that cannot be called into question. I choose to believe it, but you can certainly disagree.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  10. So much for Judeo-Christian values

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ryan,
      Only God Himself can save us from this mess we are in. Values, Faith... all but gone.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. Introibo,
      I agree "only God can save us from the mess we are in". However, man has created it. In particular the conservatives and Christians. They have allowed the left to impose sodomy, transgenderism, the denial of black on white crime, etc. for years and years with hardly a whimper or backlash. It is though through denial of the degrading of the culture and society that all will be ok and God will rectify everything. Is not this kind of attitude the cowards attitude? The conservatives by their silence and lack of push back and fight have been complicit in the chain of events that has gotten us to where we are today where the criminals and Black Lives Matter are running and ruining the Country. The conservatives who have had their head in the sand and have been in denial with their lackadaisical attitude will no doubt be the first ones to bow and kneel to BLM and apologize for being born white with white privilege. Just my 2 cents.
      JoAnn

      Delete
    3. Joann,
      Without question, you prove the truism that “Evil will only triumph when good men do nothing.”

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    4. Telling the truth is the new Hate Speech in this Country and it has been brewing for a very long time. People call "evil good and good evil". St. Louis was a good man who is being demonized by lying and evil men bent on destruction. It is an absolute outrage!

      Delete
    5. Joann,
      And Bergoglio does NOTHING!!!

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    6. Society calling good evil and evil good is thanks to total freedom of speech.

      Total freedom of speech is really stupid. As Bp. Sanborn said, it's like allowing coronavirus patients to cough on others. Because don't they have all rights? Which includes the right to harm others?

      In the same way, all men have the right to spread error, and also because we also have a right to be placed in error, like how uninfected people don't need to be protected from the virus because they have a right to be infected. We all have rights, and we have all rights.

      So much rights for man. We now acknowledge error to have rights. Error has no rights. Where's God's rights, which are actually due to Him?

      Delete
    7. God's rights have been usurped by the Mason's, Vatican II and all the liberal psychologists and psychiatrists. Also by the Christians silence in allowing it. Most children these days are sent off to psychologists and psychiatrists who brainwash them and turn them into snowflakes. They are taught that if they take offense to something they don't like that they should be made to feel "comfortable". As a result society has a bunch of whining kids who grown up into whining adults taking offense to anything and everything that makes them "uncomfortable". What is now going on in cities such as Portland is a product of this generation. Selfishness and self will is at the bottom of this attitude that has permeated society as a result of not having been taught Traditional morals and values. Everything is subjective. Anything goes as long as one is "comfortable" which is the height of selfishness. Therefore, no regard for another as "self" is the be all and end all. Satan and the Commies must be proud!

      JoAnn

      Delete
    8. @anon6:13
      Bp. Sanborn speaks the truth!

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    9. Introbio, you may have missed my point which is that your article demolishes the idea that the concept of “Judeo-Christian values” as a philosophical entity exists. Nonetheless I am in perfect agreement with your response.

      Delete
  11. Hello,

    Unrelated, but is there someone willing, and can gain permission to upload the CMRI's current coat of arms/logo to wikimedia and place it on wikipedia's page?

    The current, complicated one shown in wikipedia's page of CMRI is the previous design. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon11:43
      I can’t but if any of my readers can, they can respond and I’ll publish what they write.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. This is a random thought, but alliances of sedevacantist communities are badly needed today more than it seems. The 'benefits' of disunity are really low.

      I love the SSPV, but their attitude is what makes them somewhat confined to North America. Because they feel an urge to first establish parallel chapels/churches in areas with pre-existing sedevacantist chapels/churches instead of prioritizing to spread across the world.

      On the other hand, for example, because of the strong alliance between the CMRI and SST, the CMRI has no business on placing chapels in Mexico and instead focuses its funds and priests to other parts of the world, even Russia, which our Lady of Fatima pleads to be consecrated. This makes the CMRI very huge.

      I don't think the capitalist argument that having a monopoly in an area won't work. If a sedevacantist priest only prays the Mass properly and makes his chapel orderly just so that other sedevacantists won't go to other chapels, I honestly find it utterly disgusting.

      Delete
    3. The infighting and disunity among the Sedes is disgusting. I am afraid if the Sedes don't find away to unite that they are all going to fall by the way side. There is strength in unity. Disunity breeds destruction.
      JoAnn

      Delete
    4. @anon9:42 and Joann,
      I agree with you both. However, the problem is with the very situation in which we find ourselves. The principle of unity is the papacy. Take away the pope and this infighting is to be expected. I think it may take a miracle of God to restore the Church to Her usual non-extraordinary state as it was pre-Vatican II.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    5. @anon9:42 here

      I will like to correct my statement. The CMRI does have one chapel in Mexico, but I believe my point still stands.

      Delete
  12. "That King St. Louis was imperfect, conceded..." He wasn't perfect, BUT he was PERFECTED; that's why he's a Saint and a model for us here and now...in the Year of Our Lord, 2020!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon4:07
      Very true!

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. Blacks in this Country have conditioned Whites that the Whites are the Racists. I hope the Whites that haven't yet swallowed the Black Kool aid are awake enough to realize that the Blacks and BLM are the real Racists!

      Delete
    3. @anon1:26
      To be certain, all those involved in BLM are Communists or at the very least “useful idiots.” However, we must remember that not all black people belong to or agree with BLM. Also, there are people of good Will in all religions who are there because of various reasons, but when shown the truth, they will follow it. If such were not the case there would be no converts to the Church.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    4. Introibo,
      The "good and bad in all Religions" saying sounds to me like it is directly from the Mason's.
      JoAnn

      Delete
    5. Joann,
      If taken to mean “good and bad elements” that is Modernist gobbledygook. The Masons would also agree. What can also mean people of good will and bad will. That is not Modernist or Masonic but true. If there were no good willed people, where would we get converts? I was raised in the Vatican II sect, but was of good will. Therefore, when shown the truth by Fr DePauw I converted. There are those not of good will in the V2 sect and will follow Bergoglio as “Pope” no matter how strong the evidence.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    6. Let's also not forget that there are many people of other religions today (and historically) who manifest natural virtues in an excellent manner.

      However, if lacking in any of the supernatural virtues as revealed by the One True Religion, then those natural virtues will not avail anyone at all in the order of salvation.

      Sincerely,

      A Simple Man

      Delete
    7. Introibo,
      What exactly does "good will" mean? Does it mean "good intentioned"?

      Delete
    8. Joann,
      It means that someone honestly seeks to do the Will of God, and upon sufficient evidence will follow the Will of God. People who are not of good will blindly follow their beliefs and will not consider evidence.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  13. Sorry for this another unrelated question, but Introibo, do you view the monks consecrated by the Dominican Bp. McKenna as Dominicans as true Dominicans?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon6:04
      No. There is no General Superior and those with authority to perpetuate the Dominican (or any other) order. They are valid priests and bishops. They may undertake to perpetuate the Dominican order by choice. However, they are not actual Dominicans as were those properly enrolled prior to Vatican II.

      God Bless,

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    2. Thanks, Introibo.

      Delete
    3. What implications does that have for the Dominican religious order, and religious orders in general (franciscans, jesuits, etc.)?

      If/when a true Pope is restored to the Papal throne, would these religious orders be able to be restored? Would the restored orders have a broken continuity with the original ones?

      This is a topic I've been wondering about for a while now.

      Delete
    4. Neyoriquans,
      A true pope would be able to restore all the traditional religious orders and they would be in continuity with the order pre-Vatican II.Pope Clement XIV suppressed the Jesuits in 1773 and they were restored by Pope Pius VII in 1814.

      —-Introibo

      Delete
    5. Thank you for your reply, much obliged!

      God bless!

      Delete
  14. Beautiful amazing insightful post.
    This is 1 of your best blog entries in my opinion.
    God bless -Andrew-

    ReplyDelete
  15. I walk around appalled much of the time, even in novus ordo when i wrote ( i now know as pathetic) letters making suggestions to wolf bishops.

    I dare not suggest it, but here goes...
    You are a very honorable man in worst moral time on earth...ask Blessed Virgin Mary and leave it in Her hands.
    Sorry for arrogance in giving you advice.
    My anger is beyond words at all the situations but i try...

    ReplyDelete
  16. Excellent Post. Are there any other saints you admire as much as Louis IX?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon12:42
      Admire as much as King St Louis IX? No. Admire greatly and have a special devotion to them? Yes. The list includes:

      St Joseph
      St Francis of Assisi
      St Dymphna
      St Peregrine
      St Thomas Aquinas
      St Thomas More
      St Philomena
      Pope St. Pius V
      Pope St Pius X
      And St Michael (really an angel, but on my list!)

      —-Introibo

      Delete
  17. I disagree that Louis IX was an absolute monarch. I believe that's part of the modernist plot in discrediting Catholic monarchism. Absolutism (like the one on Roman Empire and under Louis XIV, who introduced it in France, meaning it wasn't in France first) is not in line with Catholic morality, according to "Framework of a Christian State" by Fr. Cahill, S.J.
    Louis IX headed a feudal monarchy. A feudal monarchy has fundamental laws and is not absolute.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anon6:22
      Theologian Cahill describes the three types of monarchy on pg. 477 of his excellent work. The monarchy of King St. Louis IX would be correctly labeled "Constitutional Monarchy." I wasn't trying to set out the precise kinds and definitions of monarchy. In common parlance, King St. Louis was "absolute" insofar as he had no earthly superior other than the pope. I never claimed France had "absolute monarchy first."

      The Constitutional Monarchy had fundamental laws because it was a Catholic State which recognized such. Excommunication by the pope would strip the King of his throne and release his vassals of their loyalty and obedience due to him.

      If you wish to make the proper theological distinction, please do so, but (a) I'm not here to "promote Modernism" or discredit Catholic monarchism and (b) I wasn't writing on the types of monarchy but writing in the colloquial sense.

      God Bless,

      ---Introibo

      Delete
    2. Understood and much obliged

      Delete